For those migrating from oslosphinx to openstackdocstheme, I strongly
advise to follow the docs for openstackdocstheme 1.11 on how to set it up:
https://docs.openstack.org/openstackdocstheme/latest/
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxf
On 2017-06-27 22:54, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Full background, context and details can be read here:
> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/pike/os-manuals-migration.html
>
> TL;DR: there is a massive cross-project effort which aims to migrate
> documentations out of a central repo
Hi Storyboard team,
the openstackdocstheme has a "Report a bug" feature, where you can click
on the Bug icon and get a link to project's bug area in launchpad
together with information about the documentation (bug tag, git URL of
build, date, SHA, extra text).
How can this be done with storyboard
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 02:47:30PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-06-27 16:51:37 +1000:
> > Hi all,
> > Up 'til now we haven't set a last release date for a stable branch
> > approaching end of life. It seems like formalizing that would be a good
> >
Hi,
Just a small addition. “mistral action-update” applies only to so-called ad-hoc
actions which are essentially wrappers written in YAML. You can’t update a
regular action written in Python and plugged in Mistral with stevedore using
this command.
Renat Akhmerov
@Nokia
On 28 Jun 2017, 08:03
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2017-06-17 01:20:28 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm happy to help do this if you'd like. Otherwise the script I've
> > used for the last few retirements is here:
> > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/rele
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 08:59:27PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> Fingers crossed that we'll be able to switch to Gerrit 2.13 soon and
> resume that much needed development effort.
This looks to have landed in 2.14[1] :( I don't know how hard it'd be
to backport to 2.13 or even if that's a thin
+1
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Michał Jastrzębski [mailto:inc...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 10:46 PM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-ansible] Proposing Surya (spsurya) for
>> core
>>
Hello, Silvia,
Thank you for your interest in Tricircle and Trio2o.
See inline comments.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
From: Silvia Fichera [fichera@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 June 2017 5:16
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions);
o
+1
李灿伟 licanwei__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstac
+1
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Michał Jastrzębski [mailto:inc...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 10:46 PM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-ansible] Proposing Surya (spsurya) for
>> core
>>
HI, Steve -
> I think perhaps the confusion is because this was implemented in
> tripleoclient, and porting it to tripleo-common is not yet completed?
> (Alex can confirm the status of this but it was planned I think).
>
> Related ML discussion which includes links to the patches:
>
> http://list
Hi all,
Keystone has deprecated the domain configuration upload capability
provided through `keystone-manage`. We discussed it's removal in today's
meeting [0] and wanted to send a quick note to the operator list. The
ability to upload a domain config into keystone was done as a stop-gap
until the
Hi Graham,
As ever, many thanks for clarifying that. And I shall put in a feature
request as you suggest.
In the meantime, presumably the missing pieces that I need are those
described in:
https://docs.openstack.org/ocata/networking-guide/config-dns-int.html
under
'Configuring OpenStac
On 22:18 Jun 27, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2017-06-27 14:34:46 -0700 (-0700), Mike Perez wrote:
> [...]
> > ## PTG
> >
> > New contributors should be participating in the sessions for a
> > project and get to know who are the people leading those efforts.
> > People leading efforts want help. Whe
On 00:07 Jun 28, Ildiko Vancsa wrote:
> > On 2017. Jun 27., at 23:34, Mike Perez wrote:
> >
> > On 13:52 Jun 23, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
> >> Great idea!
> >>
> >> I would also throw another issue new people often have (I had it too).
> >> Namely what to contribute. Lot's of people wants t
I would like to help with some part.
Dong
2017-06-28 4:54 GMT+08:00 Emilien Macchi :
> Full background, context and details can be read here:
> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/
> pike/os-manuals-migration.html
>
> TL;DR: there is a massive cross-project effort which aims to
On 2017-06-27 14:34:46 -0700 (-0700), Mike Perez wrote:
[...]
> ## PTG
>
> New contributors should be participating in the sessions for a
> project and get to know who are the people leading those efforts.
> People leading efforts want help. Whether it be documentation for
> the thing, implementat
Storyboard can definitely help with this! Each task in a story has an owner
and a project while the larger story's description could list who is in
charge of the larger implementation overall.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 4:34 PM Mike Perez wrote:
> On 13:52 Jun 23, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
> > Grea
On 13:52 Jun 23, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
> Great idea!
>
> I would also throw another issue new people often have (I had it too).
> Namely what to contribute. Lot's of people wants to do something but
> not quite know where to start.
> So few ideas for start:
> * List of triaged bugs
> * List of
On 09:45 Jun 26, Alexandra Settle wrote:
> I think this is a good idea :) thanks Mike. We get a lot of people coming to
> the docs chan or ML asking for help/where to start and sometimes it’s
> difficult to point them in the right direction.
>
> Just from experience working with contributor docume
Hi all,
I would like to build up a multi-region openstack and I read that both
tricircle and trio2o are the most suitable solutions.
I have few questions:
- from the wikis I couldn't deeply understand the differences between the
two: ad far as I understood tricircle deploys a shared neutron module,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> One of the areas identified as a priority by the Board + TC + UC
> workshop in March was the need to better close the feedback loop and
> make unanswered requirements emerge. Part of the solution is to ensure
> that groups
On 2017-06-17 01:20:28 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote:
[...]
> I'm happy to help do this if you'd like. Otherwise the script I've
> used for the last few retirements is here:
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/release-tools/tree/eol_branch.sh
That would be really appreciated if y
On 2017-06-27 15:42:05 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Sean Dague wrote:
[...]
> > I wonder if we're going down this path, if some kind of tooling like
> > standard tags for issues/patches should be added to the mix to help gain
> > the effectiveness that the k8s team seems to have here.
>
Full background, context and details can be read here:
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/pike/os-manuals-migration.html
TL;DR: there is a massive cross-project effort which aims to migrate
documentations out of a central repository and into project trees,
managed by project tea
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Central Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0600
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02000
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Dan Trainor wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I'm looking for the glue that populates the overcloud role list.
>
> I can get a list of roles via 'openstack overcloud role list', however I'm
> looking to create new roles to incorporate in to this list.
>
> I got as far as
Hi -
I'm looking for the glue that populates the overcloud role list.
I can get a list of roles via 'openstack overcloud role list', however I'm
looking to create new roles to incorporate in to this list.
I got as far as using 'mistral action-update' against what I beleive to be
the proper actio
On 06/27/2017 03:19 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> Hi Castulo, sorry for the delayed response on this. Has your team moved
>> forward on any of this?
>
> IIRC this work was impacted by the OSIC shutdown, I believe it is not
> currently on anyone's ra
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Hi Castulo, sorry for the delayed response on this. Has your team moved
> forward on any of this?
IIRC this work was impacted by the OSIC shutdown, I believe it is not
currently on anyone's radar.
> What about the Grenade testing framework that
Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-06-27 16:51:37 +1000:
> Hi all,
> Up 'til now we haven't set a last release date for a stable branch
> approaching end of life. It seems like formalizing that would be a good
> thing.
>
> This comes up as we need time to verify that said release int
On 04/05/2017 04:22 PM, Martinez, Castulo wrote:
Hi,
As you might know, the TC introduced new tags [1] for upgrade processes
quite some time ago, which reflect the level of maturity of an upgrade.
Therefore there is the growing need of test tools which help to exercise
and validate the upgrade a
Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Overall it would take 1-2 days for people not familiar with OpenStack.
What about if one make "Sing-Up" page:
1) Few steps: provide Username, Contact info, Agreement, SSH key (and it
will do all work for you set Gerrit, OpenStack,...)
2) After one finished form it gets in
+1. Keep it up Yumeng!!
- Pru
From: "Чадин Александр (Alexander Chadin)"
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 6:43 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [watcher] Nominate Yumeng Bao to the core t
On 2017-06-26 15:27:21 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Flavio Percoco wrote:
> > [...]
> > Not being able to easily ping someone during a meeting is kind
> > of a bummer but I'd argue that assuming someone is in the
> > meeting channel and available at all times is a mistake to begin
> > wit
Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2017-06-27 17:55:57 +:
> On 2017-06-22 16:27:34 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
> [...]
> > The new job is configured to update the docs for all repos every
> > time a patch is merged, not just when we tag releases. The server
> > projects have been
On 2017-06-26 10:51:08 -0700 (-0700), Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
[...]
> > - When you try to contribute your first commit (if you already
> > created it, you won't be able unit you do git commit --ament, so
> > git review will add change-id)
>
>
On 2017-06-22 16:27:34 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
[...]
> The new job is configured to update the docs for all repos every
> time a patch is merged, not just when we tag releases. The server
> projects have been working that way, but this is different for some
> of the libraries, especiall
On 06/27/2017 09:36 AM, Henning Schild wrote:
Am Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:28:34 -0600
schrieb Chris Friesen :
Once you use "isolcpus" on the host, the host scheduler won't "float"
threads between the CPUs based on load. To get the float behaviour
you'd have to not isolate the pCPUs that will be us
On 27/06/17 16:36, Lawrence J. Albinson wrote:
> Hi Graham,
>
> Many thanks for the pointer. I hadn't added dns to the plugin list.
>
> I did, however, set the following:
>
> neutron_designate_enabled: True
Ah - unfortunately there is two ways of integrating Neutron + Designate
The extern
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
>> So, should we let teams to host IRC meetings in their own channels?
>
>
> Yes.
++
>> Thoughts?
>
>
> I think the silo-ing concern is, at least recently, not relevant on
> two fronts: IRC was neve
Thanks everyone for your feedback regarding the proposal below.
Going forwards we are going to implement Option 3.
If anyone is able to help out with this migration, please let me know :)
Looking forward to getting started!
From: Alexandra Settle
Date: Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 4:06 PM
To: Ope
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
> On 26/06/17 17:35 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
>
>> 2. We would like to become an official OpenStack project, and in general
>> we
>> follow all the necessary rules and recommendations, starting from weekly
>> IRC meetings and our own cha
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> From what I can tell, Keycloak is an Identity provider, not a secret store?
>
> Yes! I should explain more detailed.
CloudBand is a big enterprise system for SDN and OpenStack is a part of it.
The default Identity provider of the system is Keyc
Am Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:25:14 -0600
schrieb Chris Friesen :
> On 06/27/2017 01:44 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:19:12AM +0200, Henning Schild wrote:
> >> Am Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:09:10 +0200
> >> schrieb Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui :
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Jun 23, 20
Hi Graham,
Many thanks for the pointer. I hadn't added dns to the plugin list.
I did, however, set the following:
neutron_designate_enabled: True
I'm wondering if the two together will fix things. I shall know by the morning.
Again, many thanks.
Kind regards, Lawrence
___
Am Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:28:34 -0600
schrieb Chris Friesen :
> On 06/27/2017 01:45 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:12:49PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> >> On 06/25/2017 02:09 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:34:26AM -0600, C
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Vladimir Kuklin wrote:
> Folks, I sent a reply a couple of days ago, but somehow it got lost. The
> original message goes below
>
> Folks
>
> It is essentially true that Fuel is no longer being developed as almost 99%
> of people have left the project and are worki
On 06/27/2017 01:45 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:12:49PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 06/25/2017 02:09 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:34:26AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 06/23/2017 09:35 AM, Henning Schild wrote:
Am Fri, 2
On 06/27/2017 01:44 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:19:12AM +0200, Henning Schild wrote:
Am Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:09:10 +0200
schrieb Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui :
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:34:26AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 06/23/2017 09:35 AM, Henning Schild w
On 27/06/17 15:01, Lawrence J. Albinson wrote:
> Hello Colleagues,
>
> I am trying to enable dynamic updating of DNSaaS when a port or VM is
> created/deleted.
>
> I have DNSaaS working with Bind9 as the back-end and I am able to
> manually create/update/delete entries with the openstack client a
Hello Colleagues,
I am trying to enable dynamic updating of DNSaaS when a port or VM is
created/deleted.
I have DNSaaS working with Bind9 as the back-end and I am able to manually
create/update/delete entries with the openstack client and/or the designate
client and see Bind9 reflect those cha
Am Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:44:22 +0200
schrieb Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui :
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:19:12AM +0200, Henning Schild wrote:
> > Am Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:09:10 +0200
> > schrieb Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui :
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:34:26AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > >
I am proposing that the following people be removed as core reviewers from
the hacking project: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/153,members
Joe Gordon
James Carey
Joe Gordon:
Has not done a review in OpenStack since 16-Feb-2017
http://stackalytics.com/?release=all&user_id=jogo
Has n
On 06/27/2017 09:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Sean Dague wrote:
>> I also think it's fine to rebrand WG to SIG, but we should also be
>> honest that it's mostly a rebrand to consolidate on terminology that k8s
>> and cncf have used that people find easier to understand so it's a way
>> in which o
Blair Bethwaite wrote:
> There is a not insignificant degree of irony in the fact that this
> conversation has splintered so that anyone only reading
> openstack-operators and/or user-committee is missing 90% of the
> picture Maybe I just need a new ML management strategy.
That irony is not lo
Hi watcher folks,
I’d like to nominate Yumeng Bao to the core team. She has made a lot of
contributions including specifications,
features and bug fixes. Yumeng has attended PTG and Summit with her
presentation related to the Watcher.
Yumeng is active on IRC channels and take a part on weekly me
Sean Dague wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 01:10 PM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
>> One of key components which, imho, made SIGs successful in k8s is
>> infrastructure behind it.
>>
>> When someone proposes an issue, they can tag SIG to it. Everyone in
>> this SIG will be notified that there is an issue they
Resend for openstack-dev with proper list perms...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Blair Bethwaite
Date: 27 June 2017 at 23:24
Subject: [scientific] IRC Meeting (Tues 2100 UTC): Science app catalogues,
network security of research computing on OpenStack
To: user-committee , "opensta
hi,
i'm proposing to deprecate/remove pollster-list config option. if you're
like me and wondering what this is, we apparently support ability to
filter pollsters loaded by polling agent[1].
the reason i'd like to deprecate is because we already have this
functionality in the polling|pipeline.
On 27/06/17 05:56 AM, zhi wrote:
> Everything goes well when the "api_workers " equals 0 or 1. But two main
> processes were started when the " api_workers " equals 2. The log shows
> below:
>
> 2017-06-27 17:42:18.864 1958058 INFO abc.common.wsgi [-] (1958058) wsgi
> starting up on http://0.0.0.
There is a not insignificant degree of irony in the fact that this
conversation has splintered so that anyone only reading openstack-operators
and/or user-committee is missing 90% of the picture Maybe I just need a
new ML management strategy.
I'd like to add a +1 to Sean's suggestion about WG/
From what I can tell, Keycloak is an Identity provider, not a secret store?
-jay
On 06/27/2017 05:35 AM, Adam Heczko wrote:
Barbican already supports multiple secret storage backends [1] and most
likely adding Keycloak's one [2] should be possible.
[1]
https://docs.openstack.org/project-inst
++ openstack-dev
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Chandan kumar wrote:
>> Hello Ghanshyam,
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Ghanshyam Mann
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Chandan kumar wrote:
Hello,
I
On 06/21/2017 01:10 PM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
> One of key components which, imho, made SIGs successful in k8s is
> infrastructure behind it.
>
> When someone proposes an issue, they can tag SIG to it. Everyone in
> this SIG will be notified that there is an issue they might be
> interested it
On 06/27/2017 04:50 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> gordon chung wrote:
>> do we know why they're not being completed? indifference? lack of resources?
>
> I would say it's a mix of reasons. Sometimes it's a resource issue, but
> most of the time it's a prioritization issue (everyone waiting for
> som
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Eric Harney wrote:
> On 06/19/2017 09:22 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> On 6/16/2017 8:58 AM, Eric Harney wrote:
>>> I'm not convinced yet that this failure is purely Ceph-specific, at a
>>> quick look.
>>>
>>> I think what happens here is, unshelve performs an asyn
Hi, all.
Here, I want to start a main process and multi subprocess by using
oslo_service. So I launch a service like this:
from oslo_service import service as common_service
def serve_wsgi(cls):
try:
service = cls.create()
except Exception:
wit
Barbican already supports multiple secret storage backends [1] and most
likely adding Keycloak's one [2] should be possible.
[1]
https://docs.openstack.org/project-install-guide/key-manager/draft/barbican-backend.html
[2] https://github.com/jpkrohling/secret-store
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:42 AM
Hello, team,
Agenda of Jun.28 weekly meeting:
1. feature implementation review
2. Community wide goals, PTG and Sydney summit topics
3. Open Discussion
How to join:
# IRC meeting: https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=openstack-meeting on
every Wednesday starting from UTC 1:00.
B
gordon chung wrote:
> do we know why they're not being completed? indifference? lack of resources?
I would say it's a mix of reasons. Sometimes it's a resource issue, but
most of the time it's a prioritization issue (everyone waiting for
someone else to pick it up), and in remaining cases it's pur
Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
> Does the above mean you are implementing a share secret storage
> solution or that you are going to use an existing solution like
> Barbican that does that?
>
> Sectets is a plugin for Glare we developed for Nokia CloudBand
>
Hi Training Team,
It is a friendly reminder that we’re having our Europe and Asia TZ friendly
meeting slot at 0900 UTC today, on #openstack-meeting-3.
You can find the meeting agenda here:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-upstream-institute-meetings
Thanks,
Ildikó
(IRC: ildikov)
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:12:49PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> On 06/25/2017 02:09 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:34:26AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > > On 06/23/2017 09:35 AM, Henning Schild wrote:
> > > > Am Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:11:10 +0200
> > > > schrieb
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:19:12AM +0200, Henning Schild wrote:
> Am Sun, 25 Jun 2017 10:09:10 +0200
> schrieb Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui :
>
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:34:26AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
> > > On 06/23/2017 09:35 AM, Henning Schild wrote:
> > > > Am Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:11:10
On 26/06/17 17:35 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
2. We would like to become an official OpenStack project, and in general we
follow all the necessary rules and recommendations, starting from weekly
IRC meetings and our own channel, to Apache license and Keystone support.
For this reason, I want to
77 matches
Mail list logo