> Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >
> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library
> >
> >> Team,
> >>
> >> fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2
te: March 18, 2016 at 13:06:02
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library
>
>>
>> > On 18 Mar 2016, at 17:05, Doug Wiegley wrote:
>> >> On Mar 18, 2016, at 8
-Original Message-
From: Cory Benfield
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: March 18, 2016 at 13:06:02
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library
> On 18 Mar 2016, at 17:05, Doug Wiegley wrote:
>> On Mar 18, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Cory Benfield wrote:
>>
>> Getting requests to talk over a Unix domain socket is not particularly
>> tricky, and there are third-party libraries that hook into requests
>> appropriately to make that happen. For ex
On 03/18/2016 02:34 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 03/14/2016 03:28 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Ian,
+1 to get rid of that dependency if possible.
+1 for any action aiming toward removing *any* dependency.
We don't have enough of such actions, and we have a way too many
> On 18 Mar 2016, at 13:57, Brian Haley wrote:
>
> On 03/17/2016 06:04 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote:
Here is the non comprehensive list of usages based on what trees I
happen to have checked out (which is quite a few, but not all of
OpenStack for sure).
I think before decidin
On Thu, Mar 17 2016, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> We don't have enough of such actions, and we have a way too many
> dependencies, with many duplicate functionalities too. Just to name a few:
> - oslo.concurrency vs lockfile
You made me check, but this is not true anymore. Lockfile is not used
anywher
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Cory Benfield wrote:
>
>>
>> On 18 Mar 2016, at 13:57, Brian Haley wrote:
>>
>> On 03/17/2016 06:04 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote:
> Here is the non comprehensive list of usages based on what trees I
> happen to have checked out (which is quite a few, but not a
t; > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50
> > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack
Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 03/14/2016 03:28 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Ian,
+1 to get rid of that dependency if possible.
+1 for any action aiming toward removing *any* dependency.
We don't have enough of such actions, and we have a way too many
dependencies, with many duplicate functionaliti
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Chris Dent wrote:
wsgi-intercept (I maintain that) can use httplib2, http.lib or
requests (and if you go back a few versions even more) so those tests
could be updated to use requests and still use wsgi-intercept if that
was desired.
I've just released a version of wsgi-in
On 03/14/2016 03:28 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Ian,
>
> +1 to get rid of that dependency if possible.
+1 for any action aiming toward removing *any* dependency.
We don't have enough of such actions, and we have a way too many
dependencies, with many duplicate functionalities too. Just to name
On 03/18/2016 09:31 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17 2016, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> We don't have enough of such actions, and we have a way too many
>> dependencies, with many duplicate functionalities too. Just to name a few:
>> - oslo.concurrency vs lockfile
>
> You made me check, bu
ons)
>>> Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50
>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library
>>>
>>>> Team,
>>>>
>>>> fyi, http://bit
On 03/17/2016 06:04 PM, Doug Wiegley wrote:
Here is the non comprehensive list of usages based on what trees I
happen to have checked out (which is quite a few, but not all of
OpenStack for sure).
I think before deciding to take over ownership of an upstream lib (which
is a large commitment over
tack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > >
> > > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50
> > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > >
> > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python librar
> Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >
> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library
> >
> >> Team,
> >>
> >> fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2
(not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library
>
> > Team,
> >
> > fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2
> >
> > We have httplib2 in our global requirements and lots of projects a
On 03/14/2016 09:51 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:41:02
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python
-Original Message-
From: Chris Dent
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: March 14, 2016 at 10:23:04
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library
> On
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Ian Cordasco wrote:
To be transparent, I've also reached out to Joe to help. My main
motivation, though, is to bring it to the point where the
recommendation is to use something that is not httplib2 eventually.
Not every library needs to live on forever.
Makes sense. My pr
On 14/03/16 10:16 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Team,
fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2
We have httplib2 in our global requirements and lots of projects are
using it[1]. Is there anyone willing to step up?
Thanks,
Dims
[1]
http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=(fro
-Original Message-
From: Chris Dent
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:49:27
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library
> On
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:41:02
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library
> On 03/14/2016 10:24 AM, Ian Corda
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/14/2016 10:24 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
And then we can (and should) also ask "Why have we been using this?
How much work do cores think it would be to remove this from our
global requirements?"
+1.
Despite volunteering to take care of it, I agree t
questions)
>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library
>
>> Team,
>>
>> fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2
>>
>> We have httplib2 in our global requirements and lots of projects are
>> using i
On 14/03/2016 10:28 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Ian,
>
> +1 to get rid of that dependency if possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Dims
>
this. i'm opening a bug to remove this from Ceilometer since it's only
for a test. i wasn't even aware we had httplib2.
cheers,
--
gord
_
Thanks Chris.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
>> fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2
>>
>> We have httplib2 in our global requirements and lots of projects are
>> using it[1]. Is there anyone willing to
2016 at 09:18:50
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library
>
>> Team,
>>
>> fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2
>>
>> We have httplib2 in
-Original Message-
From: Davanum Srinivas
Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2
We have httplib2 in our global requirements and lots of projects are
using it[1]. Is there anyone willing to step up?
I've been thinking about asking Joe about it for a while, so will
co
Team,
fyi, http://bitworking.org/news/2016/03/an_update_on_httplib2
We have httplib2 in our global requirements and lots of projects are
using it[1]. Is there anyone willing to step up?
Thanks,
Dims
[1]
http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=(from%7Cimport).*httplib2&i=nope&files=&repos=
--
Dav
32 matches
Mail list logo
