- Original Message -
> From: "Monty Taylor"
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 4:16:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud
> Provider for Kubernetes
>
> On 04/02/2017 02:53 PM, Chr
> >>> To: "Chris Hoge"
> >>> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> >>> ,
> >>> "kubernetes-sig-openstack"
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:28:29 PM
> >>>
ist (not for usage questions)"
>>> ,
>>> "kubernetes-sig-openstack"
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:28:29 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud
>>> Provider for Kubernetes
>>>
>>
> On Apr 2, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2017 02:53 PM, Chris Hoge wrote:
>> Now that the provider has a repository in the OpenStack project
>> namespace, we need to move over the existing set of issues and pull
>> requests and create an initial work list for migrating patc
stack"
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:28:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kubernetes][go] External OpenStack Cloud
>> Provider for Kubernetes
>>
>> Team,
>>
>> Repo is ready:
>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/k8s-cloud-pr
On 04/02/2017 02:53 PM, Chris Hoge wrote:
> Now that the provider has a repository in the OpenStack project
> namespace, we need to move over the existing set of issues and pull
> requests and create an initial work list for migrating patches and
> fixing existing issues.
>
> I've started up an et
Now that the provider has a repository in the OpenStack project
namespace, we need to move over the existing set of issues and pull
requests and create an initial work list for migrating patches and
fixing existing issues.
I've started up an etherpad where we can track that work[1]. In the longer
- Original Message -
> From: "Davanum Srinivas"
> To: "Chris Hoge"
> Cc: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> ,
> "kubernetes-sig-openstack"
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 2:28:29 PM
> Subject:
Team,
Repo is ready:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/k8s-cloud-provider
I've taken the liberty of updating it with the latest changes in the
kubernetes/kubernetes repo:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/k8s-cloud-provider is ready
So logical next step would be to add CI
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 8:46:42 AM UTC-7, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote:
>>
>> On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> >Folks,
>> >
>> >As discussed in the etherpad:
>> >https://etherpad.openstack.org/p
On 03/24/2017 11:22 AM, Graham Hayes wrote:
> On 24/03/17 08:46 -0700, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote:
>>
>>On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>>Folks,
>>>
>>>As discussed in the etherpad:
>>
On 24/03/17 08:46 -0700, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote:
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote:
On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>Folks,
>
>As discussed in the etherpad:
>https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers
>
>Here's
On Friday, March 24, 2017 at 3:59:18 PM UTC+1, Graham Hayes wrote:
>
> On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >Folks,
> >
> >As discussed in the etherpad:
> >https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers
> >
> >Here's a request for a repo in OpenStack:
> >https://review.op
On 24/03/17 10:27 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
As discussed in the etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers
Here's a request for a repo in OpenStack:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449641/
This request pulls in the existing code from kubernetes/kubernetes
repo an
Folks,
As discussed in the etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/go-and-containers
Here's a request for a repo in OpenStack:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449641/
This request pulls in the existing code from kubernetes/kubernetes
repo and preserves the git history too
https://github.com/
15 matches
Mail list logo
