Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Aug 9, 2017 16:48, "Kendall Nelson" wrote: Hello Everyone! The PTL Nomination period is now over. The official candidate list is available on the election website[0]. There are 2 projects without candidates, so according to this resolution[1], the TC will have to

[openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Hello Everyone! The PTL Nomination period is now over. The official candidate list is available on the election website[0]. There are 2 projects without candidates, so according to this resolution[1], the TC will have to appoint a new PTL for Storlets, and Packaging-Deb. There are 2 projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Yes, I replied on the other thread. Thanks :) L On 30/01/17 16:48, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Yes of course :) Did you want to schedule a meeting or just discuss here > more? > > I've seen some discussion about making UX to a working group? > > -Kendall (diablo_rojo) > > On Sun, Jan 29,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Yes of course :) Did you want to schedule a meeting or just discuss here more? I've seen some discussion about making UX to a working group? -Kendall (diablo_rojo) On Sun, Jan 29, 2017, 7:46 PM Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi Kendall, > > I'd like to discuss the future

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 30/01/17 14:15, Steve Martinelli wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Kendall Nelson > wrote: > > PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on > the election website[0]. > > > It's great to see only

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 8:05 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on > the election website[0]. > It's great to see only 1 project was without a PTL! > There is only 1 project without candidates, so according

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Hi Kendall, I'd like to discuss the future of the UX project with you, if that's OK? Lana On 30/01/17 11:05, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Hello All! > > PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on the > election website[0]. > > There is only 1project without

[openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Hello All! PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on the election website[0]. There is only 1 project without candidates, so according to this resolution[1], the TC we'll have to appoint a new PTL for OpenStack UX. There are 5 projects that will have an election:

[openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on the election website[0]. There are 4 projects without candidates, so according to this resolution[1], the TC we'll have to appoint a new PTL for Astara, OpenStackSalt, OpenStack UX, Security There are 6 projects that will

[openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on the wiki[0]. There are 3 projects without candidates, so according to this resolution[1], the TC we'll have to appoint a new PTL for Ec2-Api, Stable_Branch_Maintenance and Winstackers There are 10 projects that will have an

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Tristan Cacqueray wrote: > [...] > There are 5 projects without candidates, so according to this > resolution[1], the TC we'll have to appoint a new PTL for Barbican, > MagnetoDB, Magnum, Murano and Security > [...] Following our policy[1], the Technical Committee decided[2] the following for

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 18/09/15 13:41 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: I agree with Ed here. If we have a stipulated time period set for proposals then grace period sounds like a real-life deal. However, I would also encourage the idea of opening this up early and keep the folder ready and officials review the merge

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:09:04PM -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: [. . .] > > I think this is all superfluous however and we should simply encourage > > people to not wait until the last minute. Waiting to see who is > > running/what the field looks like isn't as important as standing up > > and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 18/09/15 09:17 +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:56:06AM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 17/09/15 16:00 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2015-09-17 12:51:33 -0700: > >>I think this is all superfluous however and we should simply

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 17/09/15 16:00 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2015-09-17 12:51:33 -0700: I think this is all superfluous however and we should simply encourage people to not wait until the last minute. Waiting to see who is running/what the field looks like isn't as

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Le 17/09/2015 23:09, Nikhil Komawar a écrit : On 9/17/15 3:51 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Kevin Benton > wrote: It guarantees that if you hit the date deadline local time, that you won't miss the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 17/09/15 15:47 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-09-17 18:10:26 +0200: Monty Taylor wrote: > I agree- and this is a great example of places where human judgement is > better than rules. > > For instance - one of the projects had a nominee but it

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 09/17/2015 09:15 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > > I like to solve problems and seems like this is a common problem in many > conferences, seminars, etc. The usual way of solving this issue is to > have a grace period with last minute extension to deadline for > proposals, possibly for a unknown

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 18/09/15 12:22 +, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: On 09/17/2015 09:15 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: I like to solve problems and seems like this is a common problem in many conferences, seminars, etc. The usual way of solving this issue is to have a grace period with last minute extension to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 09/18/2015 09:41 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: >> In my previous email I mentioned that folks can simply send the >> > candidacy in advance or have someone else to propose it. Seriously, >> > it's not about having a single day for sending the candidacy, it's >> > about having a clear deadline where

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 09/18/2015 06:58 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 17/09/15 15:47 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-09-17 18:10:26 +0200: >>> Monty Taylor wrote: >>> > I agree- and this is a great example of places where human >>> judgement is >>> > better than rules.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:56:06AM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 17/09/15 16:00 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2015-09-17 12:51:33 -0700: > > > >>I think this is all superfluous however and we should simply encourage > >>people to not wait until the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:55:30AM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 18/09/15 09:17 +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 08:56:06AM +0200, Flavio Percoco wrote: > >>On 17/09/15 16:00 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >>>Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2015-09-17 12:51:33

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Sep 18, 2015, at 7:27 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> I'm strongly against this extra rules. OpenStack Officials Elections are >> ran by volunteers and any rules that adds complexity should be avoided. > > +1 > > Also, the schedule is announced 6 months in advance. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

I agree with Ed here. If we have a stipulated time period set for proposals then grace period sounds like a real-life deal. However, I would also encourage the idea of opening this up early and keep the folder ready and officials review the merge prop 2 months prior to the final date. It's better

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 09/17/2015 04:50 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > >> On 09/17/2015 08:22 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 9/17/2015 8:25 AM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: >>> PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Monty Taylor wrote: > I agree- and this is a great example of places where human judgement is > better than rules. > > For instance - one of the projects had a nominee but it missed the > deadline, so that's probably an easy on. > > For one of the projects it had been looking dead for a while,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 9/17/2015 8:25 AM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on the wiki[0]. There are 5 projects without candidates, so according to this resolution[1], the TC we'll have to appoint a new PTL for Barbican, MagnetoDB, Magnum, Murano and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Time.is is showing utc in "PM" not a 24 hour clock. It is past 1500 UTC at the moment. Sent via mobile > On Sep 17, 2015, at 08:05, Douglas Mendizábal > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > I think someone jumped the gun on this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 09/17/2015 04:50 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 09/17/2015 08:22 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/17/2015 8:25 AM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on the wiki[0]. There are 5 projects without candidates, so according to this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

in their communities (like me). I'd like to better understand what happens next. -Rob > -Original Message- > From: Douglas Mendizábal [mailto:douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com] > Sent: 17 September 2015 14:56 > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 09/17/2015 04:50 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: > >> On 09/17/2015 08:22 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 9/17/2015 8:25 AM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: >>> PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 09/17/2015 03:05 PM, Douglas Mendizábal wrote: > I think someone jumped the gun on this thread. According to the wiki > [1] the cutoff time is not until 5:59 UTC, which > doesn't happen for another few hours. [2] > > Am I missing something? > > [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:05:20AM -0500, Douglas Mendizábal wrote: > I think someone jumped the gun on this thread. According to the wiki > [1] the cutoff time is not until 5:59 UTC, which > doesn't happen for another few hours. [2] > > Am I missing something? From the wiki[0]: --- Timeline

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

tions)" Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 8:48 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com<mailto:mo

[openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on the wiki[0]. There are 5 projects without candidates, so according to this resolution[1], the TC we'll have to appoint a new PTL for Barbican, MagnetoDB, Magnum, Murano and Security There are 7 projects that will have an

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 17/09/15 13:25 +, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on the wiki[0]. There are 5 projects without candidates, so according to this resolution[1], the TC we'll have to appoint a new PTL for Barbican, MagnetoDB, Magnum, Murano and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I think someone jumped the gun on this thread. According to the wiki [1] the cutoff time is not until 5:59 UTC, which doesn't happen for another few hours. [2] Am I missing something? [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 2015-09-17 10:05:20 -0500 (-0500), Douglas Mendizábal wrote: > I think someone jumped the gun on this thread. According to the wiki > [1] the cutoff time is not until 5:59 UTC, which > doesn't happen for another few hours. [2] Per that page the deadline for nominations is September 17, 05:59

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 17/09/15 13:44 +, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: On 09/17/2015 01:32 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 17/09/15 13:25 +, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on the wiki[0]. There are 5 projects without candidates, so according to this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 This is quite unfortunate, as I was intending to submit my candidacy for the Barbican project today, but I did not realize the cutoff time would be in the morning in CDT. I'd like to apologize to the OpenStack community and the Barbican team in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 09/17/2015 08:22 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 9/17/2015 8:25 AM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: >> PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on >> the wiki[0]. >> >> There are 5 projects without candidates, so according to this >> resolution[1], the TC we'll have to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 09/17/2015 01:32 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 17/09/15 13:25 +, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: >> PTL Nomination is now over. The official candidate list is available on >> the wiki[0]. >> >> There are 5 projects without candidates, so according to this >> resolution[1], the TC we'll have to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

From: Kyle Mestery > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 8:48 AM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

y > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > questions)" > Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 8:48 AM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Because it's still day_n AOE in early hours of day_n+1 local-time in a lot of places. I think I have until 6 AM the day after an AOE deadline where it's still considered the deadline date anywhere on earth, as there are still places on earth where the date hasn't flipped. Your EOD is not the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

ply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage > > questions)" > > Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 8:48 AM > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL no

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

How is it not what I described? Time zones become irrelevant if you get it in by the end of the day in your local time zone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anywhere_on_Earth On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Brian Curtin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Kevin Benton

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > Maybe it would be a good idea to switch to 23:59 AOE deadlines like many > paper submissions use for academic conferences. That way there is never a > need to convert TZs, you just get it in by the end of the day in your

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

te: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 8:48 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inau

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

It guarantees that if you hit the date deadline local time, that you won't miss the deadline. It doesn't matter if there are extra hours afterwards. The idea is that it gets rid of the need to do time zone conversions. If we are trying to do some weird optimization where everyone wants to submit

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 8:48 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Anne Gentle < > annegen...@justwriteclick.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:15 PM, John Griffith >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2015-09-17 12:51:33 -0700: > I think this is all superfluous however and we should simply encourage > people to not wait until the last minute. Waiting to see who is > running/what the field looks like isn't as important as standing up and > saying

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2015-09-17 12:51:33 -0700: > > > I think this is all superfluous however and we should simply encourage > > people to not wait until the last minute. Waiting to see who is >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-09-17 18:10:26 +0200: > Monty Taylor wrote: > > I agree- and this is a great example of places where human judgement is > > better than rules. > > > > For instance - one of the projects had a nominee but it missed the > > deadline, so that's probably

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > It guarantees that if you hit the date deadline local time, that you won't > miss the deadline. It doesn't matter if there are extra hours afterwards. > The idea is that it gets rid of the need to do time zone

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:15 PM, John Griffith > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Doug Hellmann >> wrote: >> >>> Excerpts from Morgan

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

I’d like to extend my apologies to the election officials and the TC for not submitting my Magnum PTL candidacy before the deadline. There was a miscommunication between me and Anne Gentle about the deadline, so I made inappropriate plans for submission. It is here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:15 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Doug Hellmann > wrote: > >> Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2015-09-17 12:51:33 -0700: >> >> > I think this is all superfluous however and we

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:15 PM, John Griffith wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Doug Hellmann > wrote: > >> Excerpts from Morgan Fainberg's message of 2015-09-17 12:51:33 -0700: >> >> > I think this is all superfluous however and we

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

On 9/17/15 3:51 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Kevin Benton > wrote: > > It guarantees that if you hit the date deadline local time, that > you won't miss the deadline. It doesn't matter if there are extra

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Anne Gentle <annegen...@justwriteclick.com<mailto:annegen...@justwriteclick.com>> wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:15 PM, John Griffith <john.griffi...@gmail.com<mailto:john.griffi...

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

My 2 cents: I like to solve problems and seems like this is a common problem in many conferences, seminars, etc. The usual way of solving this issue is to have a grace period with last minute extension to deadline for proposals, possibly for a unknown period of time and unannounced. However, in

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PTL nomination period is now over

stery >> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 8:48 AM >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][elections] PT