https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401414
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schneider ---
Co-maintaining is much appreciated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401414
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schneider ---
Spec URL: https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/python-neovim/python-neovim.spec
SRPM URL:
https://xor.cryptomilk.org/rpm/python-neovim/python-neovim-0.1.12-2.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395244
Aurelien Bompard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(aurelien@bompard. |
|org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343977
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(vondruch@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394262
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.03-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382655
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
pology-0.12-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393129
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-aexpect-1.2.0-3.20161110gitaca459d.fc24, python-avocado-43.0-6.fc24 has
been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394952
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
python-aexpect-1.2.0-3.20161110gitaca459d.fc24, python-avocado-43.0-6.fc24 has
been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395354
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-colorlog-2.9.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394252
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.09-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397140
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
mrrescue-1.02e-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
Yunying Sun changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(fedora@besser82.i |
|o)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #56 from Dan Horák ---
(In reply to Yunying Sun from comment #55)
> (In reply to Josh Boyer from comment #54)
> > (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #53)
> > > Isn't this request a duplicate of
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967782
--- Comment #10 from Joe Cooper ---
I've made a stab at packaging this, starting from the package found in the Lux
repo (which was itself based on an old Dag Wieers package), since the packages
referenced in this ticket are no longer accessible
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401450
Guido Aulisi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guido.aul...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401450
Fabio Alessandro Locati changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||f...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401961
Bug ID: 1401961
Summary: Review Request: madplay - MPEG audio decoder and
player
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374510
--- Comment #7 from Guido Aulisi ---
Upstream has merged the incorrect FSF address patch
(https://github.com/tomszilagyi/ir.lv2/pull/1), so the next release will
correctly report the FSF address.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401967
Bug ID: 1401967
Summary: Review Request: qcad - Powerful 2D CAD system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1401967
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401967
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal), 505154
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401967
John Florian changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||john.flor...@dart.biz
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401414
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Hrozek ---
I think the package looks good, so I'm giving review+
For posterity, here is fedora-review output:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401414
Jakub Hrozek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359914
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394789
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Hrozek ---
Fedora-review says:
Issues:
===
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: These BR are not neede
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401013
--- Comment #6 from Andrea Baita ---
Spec updated with doc generation:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/danoliv/git-octopus-spec/master/git-octopus.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158
--- Comment #3 from Ingvar Hagelund ---
Thanks Petr
Updated spec: https://ingvar.fedorapeople.org/ebtree/ebtree.spec
Updated srpm:
https://ingvar.fedorapeople.org/ebtree/ebtree-6.0.8-2.fc25.src.rpm
> TODO: Execute tests from %check section.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394789
--- Comment #19 from Filip Szymański ---
"If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires
against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. Those packages will include everything that is
required to build a standards conforming C or C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401013
--- Comment #7 from Andrea Baita ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/danoliv/git-octopus-spec/master/git-octopus.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/baitaand/git-octopus/fedora-25-i386/00485440-git-octopu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359914
--- Comment #19 from MartinKG ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #18)
> I'll take a look into this night or tomorrow.
You are welcome.
This information reached me on 2 December from the developer Cédric Bellegarde
Hello dear Lollyp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401961
Wolfgang Ulbrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chat-to...@raveit.de
Assig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401961
Wolfgang Ulbrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394789
Jakub Hrozek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #20 from Ja
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365794
--- Comment #3 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
Pull request has been merged and version 1.2 was released which includes the
MIT license file, so the review can proceed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401596
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||admil...@redhat.com
Docs Contact|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401596
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Adam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394789
--- Comment #21 from Filip Szymański ---
I was thinking of changing Recommends python{2,3}-neovim to Suggests.
This way we get fewer dependencies (Python packages or only suggested not
installed). They are not necessary to run neovim.
What do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359914
--- Comment #20 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to MartinKG from comment #19)
> (In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #18)
> > I'll take a look into this night or tomorrow.
>
> You are welcome.
>
> This information reached me on 2 Decembe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393947
--- Comment #1 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
New SRPM:
https://fedorapeople.org/~greghellings/cinch/cinch-0.2.1-1.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393947
Fl@sh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alex.mail.1...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302744
--- Comment #4 from Haïkel Guémar ---
Tests fails in mock as it tries to bind a socket already in use, if you silence
them, build's ok.
Failing test is test_norange
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302744
--- Comment #5 from Haïkel Guémar ---
Used port is PORT + 1, so 8001 according code.
8001 is used on my local machine by weechat but it'd better to randomize port
(and check if it's unused before running tests)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400236
Dhanesh B. Sabane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhanes...@disroot.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400236
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400236
--- Comment #3 from Dhanesh B. Sabane ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #2)
> Why?
So that consistency is maintained. As far as I know, one of the requirements
of a good package is that it consistently uses macros.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152
Jared Wallace changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382152
Jared Wallace changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #4 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393947
--- Comment #2 from Fl@sh ---
success build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16774595
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400236
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Dhanesh B. Sabane from comment #3)
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #2)
> > Why?
> So that consistency is maintained. As far as I know, one of the
> requi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394789
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/neovim
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401414
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-neovim
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400261
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/qrmumps
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400236
--- Comment #5 from Dhanesh B. Sabane ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4)
> Not really. The guidelines say that macros should be used for directory
> names [1] (and it's "should", not "must", there are various excepti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401961
Wolfgang Ulbrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401961
Wolfgang Ulbrich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Wolfg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379765
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
--- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System ---
elemental-0.87.5-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-563959753e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971
--- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System ---
elemental-0.87.5-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6ca5b05dc6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401414
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-neovim-0.1.12-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-125fc45785
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401414
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394789
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
neovim-0.1.7-4.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b8f61d4abb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394789
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400261
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400261
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
qrmumps-2.0-4.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2036a8c913
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400261
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
qrmumps-2.0-4.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6ec29baa85
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400261
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
qrmumps-2.0-4.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b67f3530e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401961
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/madplay
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402164
Bug ID: 1402164
Summary: Review Request: pydf - Fully colorized df clone
written in python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402164
--- Comment #1 from Devin Henderson ---
I forgot to link to the original bug report where the current maintainer stated
that he doesn't have time to upgrade the package -->
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338050
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289717
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
viennacl-1.7.1-3.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b231f2b6d4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289717
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
viennacl-1.7.1-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8fe5ca8d90
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401961
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
madplay-0.15.2b-11.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-56346b6f1e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401961
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
madplay-0.15.2b-11.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-35125c4963
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401961
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399365
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Indeed, the package home moved and there is a new version. New URLs:
Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-xmod/gap-pkg-xmod.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-xmod/gap-pkg-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #57 from Jerry Snitselaar ---
Looking to the future and RHEL, I noticed when taking a look autoconf-archive
and libcmocka are only available in EPEL. The autoconf-archive was just using
the pthread macro, so should be easy enough t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
--- Comment #28 from Tim Fenn ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #27)
> Created attachment 1221971 [details]
> review log
>
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not eva
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #58 from Gang Wei ---
(In reply to Yunying Sun from comment #55)
> (In reply to Josh Boyer from comment #54)
> > (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #53)
> > > Isn't this request a duplicate of
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
fedpkg-copr-0.10-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
fedpkg-copr-0.10-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378341
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
fedpkg-copr-0.10-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395244
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Ran
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||greg.helli...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401967
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ---
> I don't know if Hershey license can be accepted on Fedora.
Yes, it is accepted, as per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses_4
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382367
Tomas Mraz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374899
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
quassel-irssi-0-2.20161120gitcbd9bd7.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail
91 matches
Mail list logo