[DebianGIS-dev] r2158 - packages/grass/trunk/debian

2009-04-16 Thread hamish-guest
Author: hamish-guest Date: 2009-04-16 07:57:38 + (Thu, 16 Apr 2009) New Revision: 2158 Modified: packages/grass/trunk/debian/changelog packages/grass/trunk/debian/control packages/grass/trunk/debian/control.in Log: suggest gpsbabel for v.in.gpsbabel and v.out.gpsbabel Modified: packa

[DebianGIS-dev] r2159 - packages/gdal/trunk/debian

2009-04-16 Thread frankie
Author: frankie Date: 2009-04-16 08:06:37 + (Thu, 16 Apr 2009) New Revision: 2159 Modified: packages/gdal/trunk/debian/changelog Log: Ready for upload. Modified: packages/gdal/trunk/debian/changelog === --- packages/gdal/trun

[DebianGIS-dev] r2160 - packages/spatialite

2009-04-16 Thread frankie
Author: frankie Date: 2009-04-16 08:31:42 + (Thu, 16 Apr 2009) New Revision: 2160 Added: packages/spatialite/branches/ Log: Creating branches ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.or

[DebianGIS-dev] r2161 - packages/spatialite/branches

2009-04-16 Thread frankie
Author: frankie Date: 2009-04-16 08:32:21 + (Thu, 16 Apr 2009) New Revision: 2161 Added: packages/spatialite/branches/amalgamation/ Log: This is the amalgamation-based branch ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.

[DebianGIS-dev] Processing of gdal_1.6.0-3_i386.changes

2009-04-16 Thread Archive Administrator
gdal_1.6.0-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gdal_1.6.0-3.dsc gdal_1.6.0-3.diff.gz libgdal1-1.6.0_1.6.0-3_i386.deb libgdal1-dev_1.6.0-3_i386.deb gdal-bin_1.6.0-3_i386.deb python-gdal_1.6.0-3_i386.deb libgdal-perl_1.6.0-3_i386.deb libgdal-ruby1.8

[DebianGIS-dev] r2162 - packages/gdal/tags

2009-04-16 Thread frankie
Author: frankie Date: 2009-04-16 10:16:09 + (Thu, 16 Apr 2009) New Revision: 2162 Added: packages/gdal/tags/1.6.0-3/ Log: [svn-buildpackage] Tagging gdal (1.6.0-3) ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://l

[DebianGIS-dev] gdal_1.6.0-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-04-16 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: gdal-bin_1.6.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gdal/gdal-bin_1.6.0-3_i386.deb gdal_1.6.0-3.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gdal/gdal_1.6.0-3.diff.gz gdal_1.6.0-3.dsc to pool/main/g/gdal/gdal_1.6.0-3.dsc libgdal-doc_1.6.0-3_all.deb to pool/main/g/gdal/libgdal-doc_1.6.0-3_all.deb libgdal-perl_1.6

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#518495: marked as done (A 2.2 regression.)

2009-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:17:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#518495: fixed in gdal 1.6.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #518495, regarding A 2.2 regression. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#495353: marked as done (gdal-bin: gdalinfo segfaults on a 6.2Mib netCDF file)

2009-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:17:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#495353: fixed in gdal 1.6.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #495353, regarding gdal-bin: gdalinfo segfaults on a 6.2Mib netCDF file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#495354: marked as done (gdalinfo segfaults on a 6.2Mib netCDF file)

2009-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:17:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#495353: fixed in gdal 1.6.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #495353, regarding gdalinfo segfaults on a 6.2Mib netCDF file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#521747: marked as done (wrong configure option for libtiff in libgdal1-1.6.0)

2009-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:17:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#521747: fixed in gdal 1.6.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #521747, regarding wrong configure option for libtiff in libgdal1-1.6.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

[DebianGIS-dev] 回复:您好!

2009-04-16 Thread make
Title: 回复:您好! ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

[DebianGIS-dev] [josm] old Version

2009-04-16 Thread Markus Hackspacher
Package: josm Architecture: all Version: 0.0.0.20080713-1 --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hello, josm is old version, the gpx-data-files can not import in OpenStreetMap, because t

[DebianGIS-dev] r2163 - packages/josm/trunk/debian

2009-04-16 Thread nd-guest
Author: nd-guest Date: 2009-04-16 19:54:50 + (Thu, 16 Apr 2009) New Revision: 2163 Modified: packages/josm/trunk/debian/rules Log: remove binary content right before creating the tar.gz. the i18n stuff has another lib dir. Modified: packages/josm/trunk/debian/rules ===

[DebianGIS-dev] r2164 - packages/josm/trunk/debian

2009-04-16 Thread nd-guest
Author: nd-guest Date: 2009-04-16 20:08:14 + (Thu, 16 Apr 2009) New Revision: 2164 Modified: packages/josm/trunk/debian/changelog packages/josm/trunk/debian/copyright Log: add copyright of po files Modified: packages/josm/trunk/debian/changelog =

[DebianGIS-dev] r2165 - packages/josm/tarballs

2009-04-16 Thread nd-guest
Author: nd-guest Date: 2009-04-16 20:14:02 + (Thu, 16 Apr 2009) New Revision: 2165 Modified: packages/josm/tarballs/josm_0.0.svn1515.orig.tar.gz Log: update orig.tgz without jar file Modified: packages/josm/tarballs/josm_0.0.svn1515.orig.tar.gz

[DebianGIS-dev] Processed: Re: Bug#521125: /usr/bin/josm wrapper doesn't respect 'java' alternative

2009-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 521125 wishlist Bug#521125: /usr/bin/josm wrapper doesn't respect 'java' alternative Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > tag 521125 wontfix Bug#521125: /usr/bin/josm wrapper doesn't respect 'java' alternative There were no tags se

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#521125: /usr/bin/josm wrapper doesn't respect 'java' alternative

2009-04-16 Thread Andreas Putzo
severity 521125 wishlist tag 521125 wontfix thanks Hi, On Mar 25 01:01, Matthew W. S. Bell wrote: > I note that there seems to be some issues resulting in josm having a > hard dependency on OpenJDK. Regardless of this, the /usr/bin/josm > wrapper script seems to go to extra pains to prevent the

[DebianGIS-dev] r2166 - packages/josm/trunk/debian

2009-04-16 Thread nd-guest
Author: nd-guest Date: 2009-04-16 21:04:12 + (Thu, 16 Apr 2009) New Revision: 2166 Modified: packages/josm/trunk/debian/copyright Log: argh, encodings. convert this file to utf-8 Modified: packages/josm/trunk/debian/copyright ===

[DebianGIS-dev] r2167 - packages/josm/tags

2009-04-16 Thread nd-guest
Author: nd-guest Date: 2009-04-16 21:12:35 + (Thu, 16 Apr 2009) New Revision: 2167 Added: packages/josm/tags/0.0.svn1515-1/ Log: [svn-buildpackage] Tagging josm (0.0.svn1515-1) ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian

[DebianGIS-dev] Processing of josm_0.0.svn1515-1_i386.changes

2009-04-16 Thread Archive Administrator
josm_0.0.svn1515-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: josm_0.0.svn1515-1.dsc josm_0.0.svn1515.orig.tar.gz josm_0.0.svn1515-1.diff.gz josm_0.0.svn1515-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___ P

[DebianGIS-dev] josm_0.0.svn1515-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-04-16 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: josm_0.0.svn1515-1.diff.gz to pool/main/j/josm/josm_0.0.svn1515-1.diff.gz josm_0.0.svn1515-1.dsc to pool/main/j/josm/josm_0.0.svn1515-1.dsc josm_0.0.svn1515-1_all.deb to pool/main/j/josm/josm_0.0.svn1515-1_all.deb josm_0.0.svn1515.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/j/josm/josm_0.0.svn1515.

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#496861: marked as done (josm should depend on openjdk-6-jre | jamvm | java2-runtime)

2009-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:17:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#496861: fixed in josm 0.0.svn1515-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #496861, regarding josm should depend on openjdk-6-jre | jamvm | java2-runtime to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#498431: marked as done (josm: Package does not contain a .desktop file)

2009-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:17:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#498431: fixed in josm 0.0.svn1515-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #498431, regarding josm: Package does not contain a .desktop file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#509239: marked as done (josm: [needs-packaging] Update to r1137)

2009-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:17:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#509239: fixed in josm 0.0.svn1515-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #509239, regarding josm: [needs-packaging] Update to r1137 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#497559: marked as done (josm: honor $http_proxy)

2009-04-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:17:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#497559: fixed in josm 0.0.svn1515-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #497559, regarding josm: honor $http_proxy to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

[DebianGIS-dev] Voce acabou de receber um TERRA CARTOES

2009-04-16 Thread claudia . ferreira
Title: eng Ou acesse :http://www.terra.cartoes.com/br.post/portal/e-cartao?Id=2866350 © Copyright 2009, Terra Networks Brasil S.A. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://li