Re: [pmacct-discussion] Questions about IPFIX and pmacct

2014-07-18 Thread Fabien DEDENON
Le 18 juil. 2014 à 20:36, Fabien DEDENON a écrit : >> > > I don¹t know which Hardware is using Thomas. Do you know if Juniper > MX(12.3) using Inline Jflow are able to advertise samplingPacketInterval > and samplingPacketSpace fields ? > We have inline flow instance configured on our equipment

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Questions about IPFIX and pmacct

2014-07-18 Thread Fabien DEDENON
Hi all, Le 03/06/2014 16:48, « Thomas King » a écrit : > >> * Sampling information is not sent over by the router. This, >> in turn, can be because of a knob to enable on the router or >> due to a bug. Sniffing the raw IPFIX data and analizing with >> a tool like Wireshark can tell if it's th

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Questions about IPFIX and pmacct

2014-06-03 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Thomas, Comments in-line: On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 02:48:33PM +, Thomas King wrote: > We double checked the IPFIX data coming from our router. The sampling rate is > contained in the data. It comes via a data record (template id=256) and the > relevant fields are named samplingPacketInte

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Questions about IPFIX and pmacct

2014-06-03 Thread Thomas King
Hi Pierre-Yves, thanks for your suggestions. On 28 May 2014, at 18:24, Pierre-Yves Maunier wrote: > 2014-05-28 9:47 GMT+02:00 Thomas King : > - From the documentation I reasoned that pmacct/nfacct is able to handle > IPFIX sampling. I use IPFIX sampling with a sampling rate of 1. From the

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Questions about IPFIX and pmacct

2014-06-03 Thread Thomas King
Hi Paolo, thank you very much for your prompt reply. My comments are also inline. On 28 May 2014, at 17:39, Paolo Lucente wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:47:45AM +, Thomas King wrote: > >> - From the documentation I reasoned that pmacct/nfacct is able to handle >> IPFIX sampling. I us

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Questions about IPFIX and pmacct

2014-05-28 Thread Pierre-Yves Maunier
Hi Thomas, 2014-05-28 9:47 GMT+02:00 Thomas King : > - From the documentation I reasoned that pmacct/nfacct is able to handle > IPFIX sampling. I use IPFIX sampling with a sampling rate of 1. From > the results I see (pmacct or prng) the sampling rate is not recognised by > pmacct/nfacct. I

Re: [pmacct-discussion] Questions about IPFIX and pmacct

2014-05-28 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi Thomas, Inline: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:47:45AM +, Thomas King wrote: > - From the documentation I reasoned that pmacct/nfacct is able to handle > IPFIX sampling. I use IPFIX sampling with a sampling rate of 1. From the > results I see (pmacct or prng) the sampling rate is not re

[pmacct-discussion] Questions about IPFIX and pmacct

2014-05-28 Thread Thomas King
Dear all, I am currently investigating how pmacct can be used together with IPFIX data coming from Alcatel Lucent 7750 routers. During the past couple of days I hit a few questions I could not answer by myself: - From the documentation I reasoned that pmacct/nfacct is able to handle IPFIX sampl