On Monday 15 February 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> On 2010-02-14 David Koski wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 January 2010, Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
> >> On 2010-01-18 David Koski wrote:
> >>> My mail server has been getting a fair amount of spam hits that have
> >>> been rejected but the sender address is
dar...@chaosreigns.com put forth on 2/19/2010 11:26 PM:
> I want to collect all spam delivered to my server to an invalid user /
> domain. luser_relay seems to be doing part of the job, but how do I get it
> around or through spamassassin which is set up as a pre-queue content
> filter? It looks
I want to collect all spam delivered to my server to an invalid user /
domain. luser_relay seems to be doing part of the job, but how do I get it
around or through spamassassin which is set up as a pre-queue content
filter? It looks like skipping the smtpd_proxy_filter isn't an option, so
can I s
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:20:27PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 19-Feb-2010, at 12:51, brian moore wrote:
>> so they [Barracuda] have a name and reputation to protect.
>
> Heh. Sorry, but this make me laugh.
Ha, yes, indeed they have a sordid past, but I think they're doing
better now. I have not u
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, fakessh wrote:
> 1 messages rejected with banned file names.
>
> Banned File Names:
> .exe,.exe-unix,scellius_600_PLUGIN_linux-2.6.9/bin/request: 1 Times(s)
> From:
>209.85.220.217 1 Time(s)
This is not a Postfix question, please ask on another list.
--
Sahi
On 19-Feb-2010, at 12:51, brian moore wrote:
so they [Barracuda] have a name and reputation to protect.
Heh. Sorry, but this make me laugh.
--
What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you,
and to hear the lamentation of the women
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:32:27PM +0100, mouss wrote:
> Wietse Venema a écrit :
> > Emre Yazici:
> >> I want to is to dynamically set corresponding user so that
> >> Postfix can invoke maildrop with that user's permissions and
> >> mail delivery be made with the correct user rights.
> >
> > Use
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:51:22AM -0800, brian moore wrote:
> "Jon L Miller" wrote:
> > Is there a preferred list of rbl sites one can use in postfix.
> > I keep getting the following on the following:
>
> Since others answered your error message, I'll answer the first
> question:
snip
> See h
1 messages rejected with banned file names.
Banned File Names:
.exe,.exe-unix,scellius_600_PLUGIN_linux-2.6.9/bin/request: 1 Times(s)
From:
209.85.220.217 1 Time(s)
ALERTE ALERTE Virii
Patrick Chemla put forth on 2/19/2010 1:38 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Postfix 2.6 relaying tons of emails to millions email addresses
> and domains.
>
> I have listed tens of thousands of email addresses and domains to which
> I don't want to relay any more.
The plot thickens...
First you said you
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:19:31 +0100
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Why this extra complexity?
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = <..>
> reject_rbl_client b.barracudacentral.org
Because in my case it's actually a bit different: users can optin/out
of filter sets.
(using code derived from your an
Victor Duchovni:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:16:37PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > * Victor Duchovni :
> >
> > > Well, Postfix just executes "procmail" via your shell (when
> > > mailbox_command
> > > contains shell metacharacters). Don't blame the messenger. The error
> > > message
> >
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:16:37PM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Victor Duchovni :
>
> > Well, Postfix just executes "procmail" via your shell (when mailbox_command
> > contains shell metacharacters). Don't blame the messenger. The error message
> > is from your shell, which clearly reports
* brian moore :
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:56:49 +0800
> "Jon L Miller" wrote:
>
> > Is there a preferred list of rbl sites one can use in postfix. I keep
> > getting the following on the following:
>
> Since others answered your error message, I'll answer the first question:
>
> smtpd_restricti
* Victor Duchovni :
> Well, Postfix just executes "procmail" via your shell (when mailbox_command
> contains shell metacharacters). Don't blame the messenger. The error message
> is from your shell, which clearly reports not being able to run the
> /usr/bin/procmail executable.
Maybe smrsh?
--
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:56:59PM +0100, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
> > > > postconf -n | grep procmail
> > > This gives no aanswer at all. I'm installing from the source
> >
> > > With postconf |grep procmail I do get the right binary.
> >
> > So someone too clever made "procmail" a
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 02:28:43PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:21:50PM +0100, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
>
> > > postconf -n | grep procmail
> > This gives no aanswer at all. I'm installing from the source
>
> > With postconf |grep procmail I do get the right bi
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:56:49 +0800
"Jon L Miller" wrote:
> Is there a preferred list of rbl sites one can use in postfix. I keep
> getting the following on the following:
Since others answered your error message, I'll answer the first question:
smtpd_restriction_classes = class_barracuda
clas
Victor Duchovni:
> So someone too clever made "procmail" a default value for
> "mailbox_command" when building the binary package.
>
> Complain to the guilty party. This is not a default setting in the
> postfix.org source release.
Yes, please explain to the maintainer that it is
complicating su
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:21:50PM +0100, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
> > postconf -n | grep procmail
> This gives no aanswer at all. I'm installing from the source
> With postconf |grep procmail I do get the right binary.
So someone too clever made "procmail" a default value for
"mailbox_c
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:46:09PM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:40:25PM +0100, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
>
> > * El Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:59:28PM -0500, escribiste:
> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:56:38PM +0100, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> >
Ralf Hildebrandt put forth on 2/19/2010 12:35 PM:
> * mouss :
>
>>> Your DNS lookups are broken:
> ...
>> or spamhaus blocks his DNS server.
>
> Yes, but that's within my interpretation of "Your DNS lookups are
> broken" :)))
Recall my recent thread about this. I had switched my resolvers to Go
Patrick Chemla a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have a Postfix 2.6 relaying tons of emails to millions email addresses
> and domains.
>
> I have listed tens of thousands of email addresses and domains to which
> I don't want to relay any more.
>
> Is there a way to manage a local blacklist without spamassa
Jon L Miller a écrit :
> I’m getting a variety of spam mail form certain places that seems to be
> repeating itself and would like to know what is the best way to
> blacklist these or block them.
>
>
> mmtlnx:~ # postconf -n
>
> [snip]
>
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_pipelining
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:40:25PM +0100, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
> * El Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:59:28PM -0500, escribiste:
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:56:38PM +0100, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I just installed postfix 2.7.0.
> > > WIthout changes to the existing confi
* El Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:59:28PM -0500, escribiste:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:56:38PM +0100, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I just installed postfix 2.7.0.
> > WIthout changes to the existing configuration of 2.6.5 I get this error
> > using procmail as my mailbox_command:
> > Fe
* mouss :
> > Your DNS lookups are broken:
...
> or spamhaus blocks his DNS server.
Yes, but that's within my interpretation of "Your DNS lookups are
broken" :)))
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Franklin
H
Ralf Hildebrandt a écrit :
> * Jon L Miller :
>> Is there a preferred list of rbl sites one can use in postfix.
>
> No.
>
>> warning: 21.27.134.89.zen.spamhaus.org: RBL lookup error: Host or domain
>> name not found. Name service error for name=21.27.134.89.zen.spamhaus.org
>> type=A: Host not fo
Wietse Venema a écrit :
> Emre Yazici:
>> I want to is to dynamically set
>> corresponding user so that Postfix can invoke maildrop with that user's
>> permissions and mail delivery be made with the correct user rights.
>
> Use the Postfix local(8) delivery agent, and execute the maildrop
> comm
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 06:56:38PM +0100, Adrian P. van Bloois wrote:
> Hi,
> I just installed postfix 2.7.0.
> WIthout changes to the existing configuration of 2.6.5 I get this error
> using procmail as my mailbox_command:
> Feb 19 18:34:29 adrianvb postfix/local[14290]: BD85F7006D:
> to=, orig_
Hi,
I just installed postfix 2.7.0.
WIthout changes to the existing configuration of 2.6.5 I get this error
using procmail as my mailbox_command:
Feb 19 18:34:29 adrianvb postfix/local[14290]: BD85F7006D:
to=, orig_to=, relay=local, delay=0.03,
delays=0.02/0/0/0.01, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (Com
Emre Yazici:
> I want to is to dynamically set
> corresponding user so that Postfix can invoke maildrop with that user's
> permissions and mail delivery be made with the correct user rights.
Use the Postfix local(8) delivery agent, and execute the maildrop
command via the mailbox_command (or mai
On 2/19/2010 8:49 AM, Barney Desmond wrote:
On 20 February 2010 01:40, Geert Lorang wrote:
glorang:~# cat /etc/postfix/generic
@mydomain.be accep...@relayhost.other.domain
Now try to lookup someth...@mydomain.be:
glorang:~# postmap -q someth...@mydomain.be /etc/postfix/generic
glorang:~# ech
Hello,
I am trying to build a flexible mail system using different combinations
of mailing softwares (eg. Postfix & maildrop & Dovecot, Exim & Dovecot,
qmail & maildrop & Courier IMAP ...), at any time system administrator
may decide to interchange between combinations without making a design
On 20 February 2010 01:40, Geert Lorang wrote:
> glorang:~# cat /etc/postfix/generic
> @mydomain.be accep...@relayhost.other.domain
>
> Now try to lookup someth...@mydomain.be:
>
> glorang:~# postmap -q someth...@mydomain.be /etc/postfix/generic
> glorang:~# echo $?
> 1
>
> So no output (no match
Hi,
I have to use a relayhost (not managed by me) that only accepts 1 address
from me.
So I configured smtp_generic_maps:
glorang:~# postconf -n |grep -e relayhost -e generic
relayhost = relayhost.be
smtp_generic_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/generic
glorang:~# cat /etc/postfix/generic
@mydomain.be
Zitat von Patrick Chemla :
Hi,
I have a Postfix 2.6 relaying tons of emails to millions email
addresses and domains.
I have listed tens of thousands of email addresses and domains to
which I don't want to relay any more.
Is there a way to manage a local blacklist without spamassassin?
* Patric Falinder :
> Try using reject_rbl_client instead of reject_maps_rbl as it says in
> the logs.
>
> reject_rbl_client = zen.spamhaus.org
No, that's wrong syntax
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Campus Benjamin Frankli
* Jon L Miller :
> Is there a preferred list of rbl sites one can use in postfix.
No.
> warning: 21.27.134.89.zen.spamhaus.org: RBL lookup error: Host or domain
> name not found. Name service error for name=21.27.134.89.zen.spamhaus.org
> type=A: Host not found, try again
Your DNS lookups are br
39 matches
Mail list logo
