Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
**[Test build #69219 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69219/consoleFull)**
for PR 16013 at commit
[`29d65cc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69219/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69229/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69228/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16029
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15983
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15976
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15976
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69224/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16029
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69227/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69222/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69225/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15983
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69223/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69221/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16029
This is too trivial to bother with.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
[SPARK-18108][SQL] Fix a bug to fail partition schema inference
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to fix a bug to fail partition schema inference;
```
scala>
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
This query passed in the released spark-2.0.2, so it seems this regression
is involved with SPARK-18510.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
**[Test build #69231 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69231/consoleFull)**
for PR 15994 at commit
[`662acfb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
**[Test build #69230 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69230/consoleFull)**
for PR 16030 at commit
[`6bd8b4c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user ChorPangChan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16000
if there is no other comment,
i believe this PR is ready to go.
@ajbozarth
please forgive me if its not appropriate to ask
but will you please take a look on the code?
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994#discussion_r89736733
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -153,19 +168,20 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql](d
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15976
Retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
**[Test build #69233 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69233/consoleFull)**
for PR 14136 at commit
[`3c699ad`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #69232 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69232/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
[`2a1287a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994#discussion_r89736915
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -437,4 +444,38 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql](df
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994#discussion_r89736984
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -437,4 +444,38 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql](df
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994#discussion_r89737081
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -437,4 +444,38 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql](df
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15976
**[Test build #69234 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69234/consoleFull)**
for PR 15976 at commit
[`6db5af9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r89737732
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -643,8 +645,9 @@ case class ExternalMapToCatalys
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994#discussion_r89737784
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -130,6 +130,13 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql](
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r89737836
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ReferenceToExpressions.scala
---
@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ case class ReferenceToExpr
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r89739080
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/JavaTypeInference.scala
---
@@ -396,12 +396,15 @@ object JavaTypeInference {
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r89739106
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -643,8 +645,9 @@ case class ExternalMapToCatalyst
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
Currently `ImplicitTypeCasts` doesn't support cast between
`ArrayType(elementType)`s, so we have to support `ArrayType(NumericType)` for
now. When we have add that support, we could make the co
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r89739433
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ReferenceToExpressions.scala
---
@@ -74,7 +74,8 @@ case class ReferenceToExpre
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #69235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69235/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
[`b7bf966`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013#discussion_r89739977
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/random/SamplingUtils.scala ---
@@ -67,17 +67,19 @@ private[spark] object SamplingUtils {
}
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16020#discussion_r89740085
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -334,10 +334,8 @@ class KMeans @Since("1.5.0") (
val summary = new
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16020#discussion_r89740051
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/BisectingKMeans.scala ---
@@ -255,10 +256,19 @@ class BisectingKMeans @Since("2.0.0") (
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16020#discussion_r89740159
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/BisectingKMeans.scala ---
@@ -273,6 +283,7 @@ class BisectingKMeans @Since("2.0.0") (
v
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994#discussion_r89740299
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -437,4 +444,38 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql](df
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994#discussion_r89740897
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -130,6 +130,13 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql](df
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
**[Test build #69236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69236/consoleFull)**
for PR 15994 at commit
[`d1ba27f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994#discussion_r89741302
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -130,6 +130,13 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql](
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013#discussion_r89741513
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/tree/configuration/BoostingStrategy.scala
---
@@ -36,14 +36,14 @@ import org.apache.spark.mllib.tree.lo
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013#discussion_r89741431
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/SlidingRDD.scala
---
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ class SlidingRDDPartition[T](val idx: Int, val prev:
Partiti
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
**[Test build #69237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69237/consoleFull)**
for PR 15994 at commit
[`d7dc343`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013#discussion_r89740182
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -2063,6 +2063,7 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
{
*
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994#discussion_r89742186
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -130,6 +130,13 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql](df
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994#discussion_r89742322
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -437,4 +444,38 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql](df
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
**[Test build #69238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69238/consoleFull)**
for PR 15994 at commit
[`36bff41`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user kxepal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15961
@holdenk
Agree with you here. The message is fixed, PR rebased.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
GitHub user WangTaoTheTonic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16031
[SPARK-18606][HISTORYSERVER]remove useless elements while searching
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When we search applications in HistoryServer, it will include
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16031
**[Test build #69239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69239/consoleFull)**
for PR 16031 at commit
[`37aa3a2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780#discussion_r89744772
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/FileStreamSinkSuite.scala
---
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ class FileStreamSinkSuite extends StreamTest
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16032
[SPARK-18118][SQL] fix a compilation error due to nested JavaBeans
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR avoids a compilation error due to more than 64KB Java byte code
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013#discussion_r89744913
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/SlidingRDD.scala
---
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ class SlidingRDDPartition[T](val idx: Int, val prev:
Pa
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16032
**[Test build #69240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69240/consoleFull)**
for PR 16032 at commit
[`5debc84`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013#discussion_r89745428
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/rdd/SlidingRDD.scala
---
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ class SlidingRDDPartition[T](val idx: Int, val prev:
Partiti
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15992
I am not familiar enough with this code to review it. I do think @JoshRosen
is the right person given https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13990 and
believe he's said he will start reviewing a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
**[Test build #69241 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69241/consoleFull)**
for PR 16013 at commit
[`7d44dc5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994#discussion_r89747135
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameNaFunctions.scala ---
@@ -130,6 +130,13 @@ final class DataFrameNaFunctions private[sql](df:
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949#discussion_r89424696
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/WatermarkSuite.scala ---
@@ -96,28 +96,58 @@ class WatermarkSuite extends StreamTest with
Befo
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949#discussion_r89746924
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamExecutionMetadataSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949#discussion_r89747718
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamExecutionMetadataSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949#discussion_r89748128
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamExecutionMetadataSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949#discussion_r89747045
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamExecutionMetadataSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949#discussion_r89745095
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingAggregationSuite.scala
---
@@ -235,4 +239,85 @@ class StreamingAggregationSuite exten
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949#discussion_r89744923
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/WatermarkSuite.scala ---
@@ -96,27 +96,42 @@ class WatermarkSuite extends StreamTest with
Befo
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949#discussion_r89739836
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingAggregationSuite.scala
---
@@ -235,4 +239,85 @@ class StreamingAggregationSuite exten
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949#discussion_r89739983
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/WatermarkSuite.scala ---
@@ -96,27 +96,42 @@ class WatermarkSuite extends StreamTest with
Befo
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949#discussion_r89746706
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamExecutionMetadataSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949#discussion_r89739781
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamingAggregationSuite.scala
---
@@ -235,4 +239,85 @@ class StreamingAggregationSuite exten
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15949#discussion_r89745152
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamExecutionMetadataSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
**[Test build #69230 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69230/consoleFull)**
for PR 16030 at commit
[`6bd8b4c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69230/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
@brkyvz @tdas Could you check this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
**[Test build #69231 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69231/consoleFull)**
for PR 15994 at commit
[`662acfb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69231/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15994
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16027
Merging to master/2.1. Thanks for the review!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16027
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16031#discussion_r89758734
--- Diff: core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/historypage.js
---
@@ -78,6 +78,12 @@ jQuery.extend( jQuery.fn.dataTableExt.oSort, {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15976
**[Test build #69234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69234/consoleFull)**
for PR 15976 at commit
[`6db5af9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15976
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15976
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69234/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
**[Test build #69232 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69232/consoleFull)**
for PR 15780 at commit
[`2a1287a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15780
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69232/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
**[Test build #69233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69233/consoleFull)**
for PR 14136 at commit
[`3c699ad`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69233/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14136
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user Ru-Xiang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16033
SPARK-18607 get a result on a percent of the tasks succeed
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In this patch, we modify the codes corresponding to runApproximateJob so
tha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16033
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
1 - 100 of 676 matches
Mail list logo
