Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17587
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17587
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75646/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17585
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75644/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17586
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75645/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17585
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17586
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
**[Test build #75647 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75647/testReport)**
for PR 17330 at commit
[`7346dca`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/73
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r110586955
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2230,6 +2230,8 @@ class Analyzer(
val
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r110587073
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2230,6 +2230,8 @@ class Analyzer(
val
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r110587292
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -59,6 +59,14 @@ abstract class SubqueryExpression(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r110587691
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -401,8 +401,9 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Q
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568#discussion_r110588297
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2230,6 +2230,8 @@ class Analyzer(
val resu
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r11056
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -236,6 +244,12 @@ case class ScalarSubquery(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17586
**[Test build #75648 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75648/testReport)**
for PR 17586 at commit
[`d44bec1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d4
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17585
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17587
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17585
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17587
**[Test build #75649 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75649/testReport)**
for PR 17587 at commit
[`001921f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/00
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17585
**[Test build #75650 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75650/testReport)**
for PR 17585 at commit
[`be3fb64`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/be
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r110590426
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/subquery.scala
---
@@ -236,6 +244,12 @@ case class ScalarSubquery(
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330#discussion_r110590906
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/QueryPlan.scala
---
@@ -401,8 +401,9 @@ abstract class QueryPlan[PlanType <:
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17587
Would it be possible to post plans before and after in the description?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17584#discussion_r110594847
--- Diff: docs/submitting-applications.md ---
@@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ The master URL passed to Spark can be in one of the
following formats:
spark://HOST:P
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17588
[SPARK-20275][UI] Do not display "Completed" column for in-progress
applications
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Current HistoryServer will display completed date of
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17588
**[Test build #75651 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75651/testReport)**
for PR 17588 at commit
[`6828315`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/68
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17375
@holdenk Could this be merged maybe?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17589
[SPARK-16544][SQL] Support for conversion from numeric compatible schema
for Parquet readers
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes schema compatibility f
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17589
@wgtmac and @sameeragarwal, I am sorry it took me a while to reopen this. I
was doing this for vectorized reader together but I realised that the PR is
getting too big.
I kind of had to
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17589
**[Test build #75652 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75652/testReport)**
for PR 17589 at commit
[`1d4d40c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1d
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17580
I think I'd go with @jerryshao and not add it if it's an old, auxiliary
example anyway
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17586
**[Test build #75648 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75648/testReport)**
for PR 17586 at commit
[`d44bec1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17586
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75648/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17586
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17589
**[Test build #75653 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75653/testReport)**
for PR 17589 at commit
[`c6865bf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c6
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17563
Ping @guoxiaolongzte to fix or close but i'm not yet clear this does only
what you intend.
CC @ajbozarth
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17575#discussion_r110600408
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/PrefixSpanSuite.scala ---
@@ -360,6 +360,55 @@ class PrefixSpanSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
ML
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17575#discussion_r110600152
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/PrefixSpan.scala
---
@@ -232,6 +200,68 @@ class PrefixSpan private (
object PrefixSpan extends
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17575#discussion_r110600704
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/PrefixSpan.scala
---
@@ -232,6 +200,68 @@ class PrefixSpan private (
object PrefixSpan extends
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17589
Probably it is too late for 2.2. If anyone feels so, I will close this for
now again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17575#discussion_r110600533
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/PrefixSpanSuite.scala ---
@@ -360,6 +360,55 @@ class PrefixSpanSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
ML
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17575#discussion_r110599784
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/fpm/PrefixSpan.scala
---
@@ -232,6 +200,68 @@ class PrefixSpan private (
object PrefixSpan extends
Github user MirrorZ commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17584#discussion_r110602828
--- Diff: docs/submitting-applications.md ---
@@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ The master URL passed to Spark can be in one of the
following formats:
spark://HOST:
Github user MirrorZ commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17584#discussion_r110603062
--- Diff: docs/submitting-applications.md ---
@@ -143,6 +143,9 @@ The master URL passed to Spark can be in one of the
following formats:
spark://HOST:
Github user guoxiaolongzte closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17481
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17556
Just a flaky test. Can't be related
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17563
@ajbozarth
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user guoxiaolongzte closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17563
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user guoxiaolongzte closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17580
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
GitHub user guoxiaolongzte reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17563
[SPARK-20005][WEB UI]fix 'There is no "Newline" in UI in describtion'.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before I fix this issue, if the describtion is too long,
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17574
BTW making it `compile` scope means it is still also in `test` scope, which
is fine.
I actually don't see `xbean` as a transitive dependency otherwise? at least
from Maven and SBT as best I know
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
**[Test build #75647 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75647/testReport)**
for PR 17330 at commit
[`7346dca`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75647/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110606671
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/ValidatorParams.scala ---
@@ -67,6 +71,39 @@ private[ml] trait ValidatorParams extends HasSeed with
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110605376
--- Diff: docs/ml-tuning.md ---
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ for multiclass problems. The default metric used to
choose the best `ParamMap` c
method in each of the
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110610974
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -121,6 +121,33 @@ class CrossValidatorSuite
}
}
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110608787
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/ValidatorParams.scala ---
@@ -67,6 +71,39 @@ private[ml] trait ValidatorParams extends HasSeed with
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110609384
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -100,31 +108,60 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0") (@Since("1.4.0"
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110610030
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -100,31 +108,60 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0") (@Since("1.4.0"
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110609088
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -100,31 +108,60 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0") (@Since("1.4.0"
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110605597
--- Diff: docs/ml-tuning.md ---
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ for multiclass problems. The default metric used to
choose the best `ParamMap` c
method in each of the
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110609932
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -100,31 +108,60 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0") (@Since("1.4.0"
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110610484
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -100,31 +108,60 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0") (@Since("1.4.0"
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110605449
--- Diff: docs/ml-tuning.md ---
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ for multiclass problems. The default metric used to
choose the best `ParamMap` c
method in each of the
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110609856
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -100,31 +108,60 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0") (@Since("1.4.0"
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110606615
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/ValidatorParams.scala ---
@@ -67,6 +71,39 @@ private[ml] trait ValidatorParams extends HasSeed with
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110609667
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -121,6 +121,33 @@ class CrossValidatorSuite
}
}
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17590
[SPARK-20278][R] Disable 'multiple_dots_linter' lint rule that is against
project's code style
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, multi-dot separated variab
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17590
cc @felixcheung, could you take a look and see if it makes sense to you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110614175
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/TrainValidationSplit.scala ---
@@ -87,37 +90,64 @@ class TrainValidationSplit @Since("1.5.0")
(@Si
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110614311
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -100,31 +108,60 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0") (@Since("1.4.0"
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16774#discussion_r110614413
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tuning/CrossValidator.scala ---
@@ -100,31 +108,60 @@ class CrossValidator @Since("1.2.0") (@Since("1.4.0"
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17585
**[Test build #75650 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75650/testReport)**
for PR 17585 at commit
[`be3fb64`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17585
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17585
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75650/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17587
**[Test build #75649 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75649/testReport)**
for PR 17587 at commit
[`001921f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17587
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17587
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75649/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17586
@hhbyyh @jkbradley Please help review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user arinconstrio commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788
We are going to continue working on our solution which implies much more
than a feature for Mesos, so I close this PR, and create a new one in the short
future.
---
If your project is set up
Github user arinconstrio closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16788
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r110621829
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -2038,6 +2038,61 @@ def test_BinaryType_serialization(self):
df = self.spark.createDataFrame(data,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17589
**[Test build #75652 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75652/testReport)**
for PR 17589 at commit
[`1d4d40c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17589
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75652/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17589
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17589
**[Test build #75653 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75653/testReport)**
for PR 17589 at commit
[`c6865bf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17589
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17589
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75653/
Test PASSed.
---
GitHub user guoxiaolongzte reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17580
[20269][Structured Streaming] add class 'JavaWordCountProducer' to 'provide
java word count producer'.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
1.run example of streami
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r110624985
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -2038,6 +2038,61 @@ def test_BinaryType_serialization(self):
df = self.spark.createDataFrame(da
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17580
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308#discussion_r110625538
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaProducer.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed t
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17077#discussion_r110626138
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -2038,6 +2038,61 @@ def test_BinaryType_serialization(self):
df = self.spark.createDataFrame(da
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17588
**[Test build #75651 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75651/testReport)**
for PR 17588 at commit
[`6828315`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17588
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17588
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75651/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17527
**[Test build #75657 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75657/testReport)**
for PR 17527 at commit
[`2ac5843`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17330
**[Test build #75654 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75654/testReport)**
for PR 17330 at commit
[`22db44a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/22
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17586
**[Test build #75655 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75655/testReport)**
for PR 17586 at commit
[`0daa041`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17590
**[Test build #75656 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75656/testReport)**
for PR 17590 at commit
[`ed0dd86`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ed
1 - 100 of 422 matches
Mail list logo
