Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75928/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75930/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17669
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17669
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75929/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17669
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17669
**[Test build #75931 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75931/testReport)**
for PR 17669 at commit
[`0c9dd50`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0c
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
[SPARK-20364][SQL] Support Parquet predicate pushdown on columns with dots
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, if there are dots in the column name, predicate
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
cc @ash211, @robert3005 and @liancheng.
@liancheng, do you mind if I ask to review this please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
**[Test build #75932 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75932/testReport)**
for PR 17680 at commit
[`297c70b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/29
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #75933 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75933/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
[`58f7b80`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/58
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
will we return invalid `outputPartitioning`? Think about a
`InMemoryTableScanExec` that only read column `a`, and the `outputPartitioning`
may be `a`, `b`, is that expected?
---
If your project
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
@cloud-fan I've raised similar question before in a PR. I remember I got an
answer that an invalid `outputPartitioning` like this won't cause problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
GitHub user ouyangxiaochen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
[SPARK-20383][SQL] Supporting Create [temporary] Function with the keyword
'IF NOT EXISTS'
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
support to create [temporary] fucntio
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112135554
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2349,7 +2350,31 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
A similar example is `ProjectExec` which takes `child.outputPartitioning`
as its `outputPartitioning`. But a projection can also change child's output
like [a, b] -> [a].
---
If your project is set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
@gatorsmile CC is it reasonable?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17660
thanks, merging to master/2.2/2.1!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17660
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17660
> As we don't know the details of UDF, shall we skip UDF for
canFilterOutNull and directly return false?
Then we may miss some opportunities for optimization.
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
thanks, merging to master/2.2!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
Thanks! @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17679
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
I think it is necessary to support this key word in 'create [temporary]
fucntion ...' clause,
For example:
I hava an application which has three steps as follow :
1. insert into ta
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17568
Thank you very much!!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112141941
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2349,7 +2350,31 @@ class Analyzer(
}
GitHub user guoxiaolongzte opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17682
[SPARK-20385][WEB-UI]'Submitted Time' field, the date format needs to be
formatted, in running Drivers table or Completed Drivers table in master web ui.
## What changes were proposed in thi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17682
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17582
**[Test build #75934 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75934/testReport)**
for PR 17582 at commit
[`a8fb1e0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #75935 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75935/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
[`135c668`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/13
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665#discussion_r112142810
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -564,12 +566,22 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17416
**[Test build #75936 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75936/testReport)**
for PR 17416 at commit
[`4126702`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/41
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17682
@guoxiaolongzte, I think Web UI changes require snapstops.
(Also, it is not a big deal though, probably, it would be nicer if the
branch is rebased and sync'ed to the Spark's master bran
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17416
Thanks @BryanCutler ! yes that's working better. I can run, for example,
`./bin/spark-shell --packages
edu.stanford.nlp:stanford-corenlp:jar:models:3.4.1` and I can see that it's now
on the classpat
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17665#discussion_r112144166
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/security/ConfigurableCredentialManager.scala
---
@@ -41,15 +41,17 @@ import org.apache.spark.util.U
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17682
Agree with those comments, though the JIRA does show the change once you
format the code.
Are there other dates in the UI that aren't passed through this method?
let's look for all `\${.*[dD
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16781#discussion_r112144554
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/DateTimeUtils.scala
---
@@ -498,6 +498,11 @@ object DateTimeUtils {
false
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17682
Ok, i'm dealing right away.@srowen
This function is very important to our large spark distributed
system.Because this UI, the user concerned more, rather than our
developers.@Hy
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655
This change looks good. You're saying that you think the Avro issue is
another instance of the same issue, just in Avro? if so then, yeah, not sure we
can fix that unfortunately, not directly.
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17655#discussion_r112146073
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/SQLTestUtils.scala ---
@@ -229,6 +229,32 @@ private[sql] trait SQLTestUtils
}
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17682
Ah, I didn't mean I am against this PR. I just wanted to make this PR
better.
Just FYI in case, just simply dragging and dropping the image into PR
description in edit mode uploads the
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17682
Ok, I have not been how to upload pictures in PR, I will learn about
it.Thank you.@HyukjinKwon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112152324
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ class Analyzer(
HandleNullInp
Github user emlyn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16609
I'm happy for this to be closed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17682
@srowen
I found 9 places.
Are the following Scala files:
MesosClusterPage.scala
DriverPage.scala
ApplicationPage.scala
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658#discussion_r112154490
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -243,18 +243,19 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
**[Test build #75932 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75932/testReport)**
for PR 17680 at commit
[`297c70b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75932/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17658#discussion_r112157871
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SparkListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ private[spark] trait SparkListenerBus
l
Github user zuotingbing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17638
cc @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #75933 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75933/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
[`58f7b80`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75933/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17620
I'm still not sure what issue you met during recovery and what will be
happened if the issue is occurred?
Looks from the fix you provided, what you mainly did is to shutdown rpcEnv,
what
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17669
**[Test build #75931 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75931/testReport)**
for PR 17669 at commit
[`0c9dd50`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17669
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75931/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17669
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user eatoncys opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683
[SPARK-20386][Spark Core]modify the log info if the block exists on the
slave already
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Modify the added memory size to memSize-originalMemSi
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683#discussion_r112167792
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerMasterEndpoint.scala
---
@@ -497,11 +497,12 @@ private[spark] class BlockManagerInfo(
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683#discussion_r112167850
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerMasterEndpoint.scala
---
@@ -520,9 +521,16 @@ private[spark] class BlockManagerInfo(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683#discussion_r112167751
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerMasterEndpoint.scala
---
@@ -520,9 +521,16 @@ private[spark] class BlockManagerInfo(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191
**[Test build #75937 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75937/testReport)**
for PR 17191 at commit
[`21a5c85`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/21
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #75938 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75938/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
[`31cfee0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/31
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112168719
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2349,7 +2350,31 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112168787
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2349,7 +2350,26 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674#discussion_r112168948
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,56 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
"posex
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674#discussion_r112169318
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,56 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
"posex
Github user eatoncys commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683#discussion_r112169515
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerMasterEndpoint.scala
---
@@ -520,9 +521,16 @@ private[spark] class BlockManagerInfo(
Github user eatoncys commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17683#discussion_r112169689
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManagerMasterEndpoint.scala
---
@@ -520,9 +521,16 @@ private[spark] class BlockManagerInfo(
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674#discussion_r112171802
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,56 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
"posex
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674#discussion_r112172948
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -942,6 +942,14 @@ setGeneric("countDistinct", function(x, ...) {
standardGeneric("countDistinct")
#' @export
s
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17191#discussion_r112173197
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ class Analyzer(
HandleNullInp
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672#discussion_r112173606
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,43 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
"posex
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672#discussion_r112173641
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/functions.R ---
@@ -3652,3 +3652,43 @@ setMethod("posexplode",
jc <- callJStatic("org.apache.spark.sql.functions",
"posex
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672
**[Test build #75940 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75940/testReport)**
for PR 17672 at commit
[`fdc0395`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fd
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672#discussion_r112173770
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -918,6 +918,14 @@ setGeneric("cbrt", function(x) {
standardGeneric("cbrt") })
#' @export
setGeneric("ceil", fu
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674
**[Test build #75939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75939/testReport)**
for PR 17674 at commit
[`d2b9723`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d2
Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672#discussion_r112173828
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_sparkSQL.R ---
@@ -1714,6 +1714,28 @@ test_that("group by, agg functions", {
expect_true(abs(sd(1:2) - 0.7071
Github user zero323 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17557
Thanks @felixcheung!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
**[Test build #75935 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75935/testReport)**
for PR 16989 at commit
[`135c668`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17582
**[Test build #75934 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75934/testReport)**
for PR 17582 at commit
[`a8fb1e0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75935/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17582
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17582
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75934/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17669
Merged to master, let's see if it works
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17416
**[Test build #75936 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75936/testReport)**
for PR 17416 at commit
[`4126702`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17669
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17416
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17416
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75936/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674
**[Test build #75939 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75939/testReport)**
for PR 17674 at commit
[`d2b9723`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17674
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75939/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672
**[Test build #75940 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75940/testReport)**
for PR 17672 at commit
[`fdc0395`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17672
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/75940/
Test PASSed.
---
1 - 100 of 434 matches
Mail list logo
