--- Paul Gienger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit
:
> If this is your case, not what you posted earlier
> about connection
> refused, I'd suggest you check your password hash.
> You have to jump
> through some hoops to get CRYPT in there over the
> standard SMD5, which
> apparently most distro ver
Ilia Chipitsine wrote:
Hello.
I've setup a FreeBSD 4.x machine with Samba 2.x and and OpenLDAP backend.
I recently upgraded to Samba 3.0.10 and put "passdb
backend=ldapsam_compat" in smb.conf.
Now, everythings seems to work all right, but I see a lot of this
entries in the logs:
Feb 17 19:42:27
Hi,
in my network I had two samba server, one playing with authentication and one
as guest-like disk share. In the pdc, I defined a few alias thus the machine
was responding with different names. For an error, I didn't notice that a few
alias matches a few group names used by the clients. Now, t
I am using Samba 3.0.10-1 on Fedora Core 3. Most everything seems to be
working as I expect it to except when I try to use the srvtools package to
administrate the users and groups in the domain.
I want to check and see whether maybe I am just misunderstanding usage as
opposed to their being a co
We are unable to deliver the message from
to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
The email address used to send your message is not subscribed to this
group. If you are a member of this group, please be aware that you may
only send messages to this group using the email address(es) you have
registered with
Bruce Hohl wrote:
On a server "linuxbox" using ADS security in a Windows
2003 Active directory, part of smb.conf is ...
[srvbackup]
force user = sambaa
writeable = yes
valid users = ADS-Name+Administrator,ADS-Name+dave
path = /var/spool/samba/sambashares/srvbackup
[home
You'll can find the solution there :
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/324491/en-us
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
The recipient has requested to have their mails scanned for Spam.
Our UCE (Spam) detectors have been triggered by a message you sent:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nwm, Ġėţ ready for Romáňćė in 15 míns
- Ġėţ Ċĩàĺĩŝ softatábs at upto
80℅Ðĩŝćõùʼnţ
Date: Fri Feb 25 05:54:20 2005
Thi
I'm running samba 3.0.11 on SuSE Linux Pro 9.2.
RPM's:
samba-doc-3.0.11-0.1
samba-client-3.0.11-0.1
samba-3.0.11-0.1
samba-winbind-3.0.11-0.1
libsmbclient-3.0.11-0.1
Kernel :
Linux printserver 2.6.8-24-smp #1 SMP Wed Oct 6 09:16:23 UTC 2004 i686 i686
i386 GNU/Linux
The server is currently serv
David Rigler wrote:
Bruce Hohl wrote:
On a server "linuxbox" using ADS security in a Windows
2003 Active directory, part of smb.conf is ...
[srvbackup]
force user = sambaa
writeable = yes
valid users = ADS-Name+Administrator,ADS-Name+dave
path = /var/spool/samba/sambash
Hi
I've setup Samba successfuly. I can access my select Linux directories
from my Windows PC. I can copy file from those directories to my
Windows PC.
However, I want to be able to copy files back to the Linux directories
as well. I've created a directory named Shared and I want to be able
to cop
Hi
Some of the samba users are spreading spam or automated replies. Is
there any possible way to stop them?
I've got the following two messages after my first post which are
either spam or automated nonsense replies:
Message 1:
From: Jim Crippen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Behrang Saeedzadeh <[EMAI
Steve Cohen wrote:
Craig White wrote:
Steve Cohen wrote:
OK, let me ask this question another way, short and simple:
In a security=SHARE samba network, is there any way for a computer
outside the workgroup to connect to and use (not talking about "see")
a printer shared by samba on that network?
Hello,
I've spent the last couple of days following the HOW-TO's on how to make a
Linux server running Samba part of a Windows 2003 Active Directory, and a
lot of supplemental research from these groups and elsewhere, but now I'm
totally stuck and I can't seem to find the answer anywhere.
Basical
Could someone advise me what to do with a such problem:
I have a domain on samba-3.0.9-1 on linux redhat 7.3. And it worked
properly,
but recently several users (pc with Win XP) became not able to log in to
domain (error message
looks like : Controller of domain is down or Account of your compute
Steve Cohen wrote:
Now, Craig, to your point about security=USER being as good a choice for
me: I'm ready to try this. Can you explain how it would work for my
family users who don't at present log on with passwords? (they are using
XP). Do they fall under the guest user as they do with securi
Thanks For Contacting The World Council
Priests Of God
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/wtw
Atlanta . Los Angeles . The Hague
Original Message:
X-YahooFilteredBulk: 211.191.58.230
Authentication-Results: mta104.mail.scd.yahoo.com
from=hotmail.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Walter Argüello Cortés wrote:
| I am running samba-3.0.9-2.3.
|
| With Windows XP Pro, I use:
|
| Start -> execute-> \\main\compartido%walter
|
| And that is not working.
I had another report of this. On xp, just run
'net use \\server\share /user:usern
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
|> Although this is SMB related this is the
|> wrong list for this problem. This is a
|> SAMBA list not an SMBMOUNT list.
|
| Oh? Being one of the former maintainers of
| smbmount/smbumount and smbfs in the kernel, las
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Behrang Saeedzadeh wrote:
| Hi
|
| Some of the samba users are spreading
| spam or automated replies. Is
| there any possible way to stop them?
|
| I've got the following two messages after
| my first post which are either spam or
| automated nonsense r
Hi,
I have a few 6 Pagemaker users that are experiencing pauses with Samba 3.
Based on Googling the net setting Dos Filetimes = yes should help but I can't
reproduce the problem easily. Has anyone else experienced this type problem
and do you have any suggestions of how to trouble shoot if se
Hi, mailing list,
I'm running Samba 3.0.7 on a SuSE 9.2 with W2K and WXP clients.
Establishing a connection to a network printer works fine when I use the
windows explorer (right click on the printer share -> connect). The
connected printer can be used with all windows applications.
But now I wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi Jerry et al,
|
| I upgraded a while ago and everything looks
| fine at the first glance ;-)
|
| Though I discovered a huge problem with
| drivers that have some extended features/cards
| like the Xerox-Phaser7700. The drive
Tks Guys,
I shall do some digging. I already have the chaps at SCO scratching
themselves bald. So hopefully I shall get things going some day
Meanwhile
I shall try out all your suggestions and see what happens.
Rgds
Joe Carri
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
Le Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:37:03 -0800, Tom Skeren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
> Used the how to, but keep getting trust cannot be verified from W2K
> server. Anyone got a good walk through on setting up the trust
> between a W2k and ldap-samba domain?
Don't have tried with W2000, but with W2003
Hello Everybody,
I've just finished to install a SAMBA domain with LDAP authentication.
All works fine :). The clients runs Windows 2000 Pro or Windows XP. The
problem is that a simple user can't install or modify some system
parameters and in my office it's needed by some users. So I would like
Hallo
can someone help me with the following problem?
I have set a default ACL to the /home directory:
# file: home
# owner: root
# group: root
user::rwx
group::rwx
other::r-x
default:user::rwx
default:user:root:rwx
default:group::rwx
default:group:root:rwx
default:group:users:rwx
default:mask::
Yes, I get more than 30MB/s performance. The benchmark I use (NetBench)
is essentially CPU bound, such that a faster processor = faster
performance. With a very fast hardware config (dual 3.2GHz processors),
I've been able to hit around 100MB/s. Changing the RAM or other
attributes does not buy me
== Please reply above this line ==
Samba,
Ihre Anfrage zum Thema Global ist eingelangt, ein Mitglied des Support-Teams
wird sich Ihre Anfrage durchsehen und sobald als möglich beantworten. Dies ist
eine automatisierte Antwortmail die keine Bestätigung für eine Bearbeitung oder
Kündigun
I want to be able to use Samba to manage a Windows cluster account for
failing over two Windows clusters.
This is a small system, 8 web servers with two DB clusters along with a
couple of other servers handling backup and management functions. I run DNS
services on the firewall for the internal m
I am experiencing the following problems with the [homes] shares.
Using Samba 3.0.9 and winbind on SLES9 with NT PDC.
Running wbinfo -a authenticates users ok but I cannot connect using
smbclient.
If I comment out 'valid users = %S' from [homes] in smb.conf then it is
possible to connect using va
Dear All:
I made a change to my Samba configuration to enable Solaris ACLs in my
Installation of Samba 3.0.11. After then, I lost the ability to permit
domain users to browse the shares.
The server is running Solaris 8 2/04, and Samba is bound against MIT
Kerberos 1.4 and OpenLDAP 2.2.23. It au
Hello,
I am striving to give out globally to our developers a way to debug
their C++ applications, but I do not want to give them Admin rights on
the individual workstations.
I thought I found the light when reading on MSDN that to debug users
need to be members of the "Debugger Users" group (a
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Thierry wrote:
> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:25:14 +0100
> From: Thierry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: [Samba] Debugging Privilege and Samba 3.0.11
>
> Hello,
>
> I am striving to give out globally to our developers a way to debug
> their C++ applica
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JLB wrote:
| On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Thierry wrote:
|
|>Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:25:14 +0100
|>From: Thierry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|>To: samba@lists.samba.org
|>Subject: [Samba] Debugging Privilege and Samba 3.0.11
|>
|>Hello,
|>
|>I am striving to give out
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 13:48 -0500, JLB wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Thierry wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:25:14 +0100
> > From: Thierry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: samba@lists.samba.org
> > Subject: [Samba] Debugging Privilege and Samba 3.0.11
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am striving to give
JLB wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Thierry wrote:
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:25:14 +0100
From: Thierry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Debugging Privilege and Samba 3.0.11
Hello,
I am striving to give out globally to our developers a way to debug
their C++ applications
I apologize for being so flippant and unhelpful (although in my defense,
I posted the links to the various password tools in order to -be- helpful.
They got me some major brownie points the other day when a client's
"network administrator" (a Windows-only user) was unaware of the existence
of eithe
JLB wrote:
>I apologize for being so flippant and unhelpful (although in my defense,
>I posted the links to the various password tools in order to -be- helpful.
>They got me some major brownie points the other day when a client's
>"network administrator" (a Windows-only user) was unaware of the exi
Hi
We are in the process of designing new OpenAFS cell and need your suggestions.
I got stuck with providing Windows 95 , ME and OS/2 users access to OpenAFS
cell. We decided to use Samba as gateway. Compiled samba with "--with-afs"
option and installed. Testing failed with errors.
Then we
I'm having the same exact problem on Debian. I found the patches on your site,
but unfortunately being barely an intermediate linux user i'm not sure what to
do with the patch. So, what should i do?
Thanks in advance,
--Lucas Machado
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
Hi Folks,
I have searched the archives and the web for this issue, but I haven't found
an answer.
I need to be able to log or audit the network access of our network users.
This information needs to be used in conjuction with a time and attendance
punch clock.
I have seen much discussion of usin
Unpack Samba:
$ tar -xvzf samba-3.0.11.tar.gz
Change into the directory:
$ cd samba-3.0.11/source
Run this to add the patch:
$ patch -p1 ../../clitar.patch
(assuming you put the patch file in the same directory as the tarball.)
In general, to apply patches cd into the source tree, then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JLB wrote:
| I apologize for being so flippant and unhelpful
| (although in my defense, I posted the links to
| the various password tools in order to -be- helpful.
True. It was the most informative flippant response
I've seen in a while :-)
cheers,
Hello:
I also have the same problem on files that, according to smbstatus, have:
DenyMode: DENY_NONE
Oplocks:NONE
Strangely enough this is only happening for one Mac user. And even then this
only happens for two of the 20+ files he's got open, and the only apparent
difference b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Miles, Noal wrote:
| I am running 3.0.10-1.4E on RHEL4. The machine is
| a ADS member server. I would like to statically
| map the ADS group "Domain Admins" to the built in
| "wheel" group so all members of "Domain Admins"
| are in the "wheel" group.
L
Marc,
Thanks for the feedback. I've got a dual 64-bit opteron system (246),
going to run FC3, and I'll try to get 75+MB/sec from samba 3 <-> windows
xp client. I'll let you know the results.
Alex
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Kaplan, Marc wrote:
Yes, I get more than 30MB/s performance. The benchmark I us
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
access.
The answer is that you create a domain group on
the Samba server; add the users to that group,
the assign that SID the SeDebugPrivilege right
on the individual machines (not of the Samba DC).
user rights are local to the machine on which they
are assigned.
Is
Asky,
This has to do with the interpretation of the double quote. I advice to type
Domain\ Admins
is stead of
"Domain Admins"
Arne
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
The mail message (file: document_full.pif) you sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
contains a virus. (on the network)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
OK I set "winbind nested group = yes" option in smb.conf. Still can't quite
get it to work.
The only doc I can find says
net rpc group add wheel -L (why would I add this group, it is built in *nix
group?)
net rpc group addmem wheel "DOM\Domain Admins"
I don't even have smbd running, only winbin
OK so I've got samba-3.0.11 compiled with ACL support. I've running
2.4.25 with the ACL/ATTR patch applied. I can read and set ACLS's using
the getfacl/setfacl programs. ldd /usr/sbin/smbd shows it's linked to
libattr.so.1 and libacl.so.1. I can read ACL with the smbcacls program,
but when
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 07:41 -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Walter ArgÃello CortÃs wrote:
>
> | I am running samba-3.0.9-2.3.
> |
> | With Windows XP Pro, I use:
> |
> | Start -> execute-> \\main\compartido%walter
> |
> | And that is not w
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:57:03 +0100 Thierry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
T> Isn't that pretty much :
T> -open MMC
T> -Add the "Group Policy" snap-in
T> -Browse to Local Computer Policy\Computer Configuration\Windows
T> Settings\Security Settings\Local Policies\User Rights Assignment
T> -Open "Debug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 07:41 -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
|>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|>Hash: SHA1
|>
|>Walter ArgÃello CortÃs wrote:
|>
|>| I am running samba-3.0.9-2.3.
|>|
|>| With Windows XP Pro, I use:
|>|
|>
Hi
this is really a last resort as I'm literally pulling my hair
out over AIX and Samba and cannot find any threads on this particular
issue.
Basically we have 3 systems running AIX 5.1 and Samba 2.2.7
We upgraded one system to Aix 5.2 and everything works no problem.
Upgraded the next two a
Hello,
I installed samba3.0 on my debian machine to act as a PDC. Everything
seems to be working. The only problem is that I get errors reading
and writing back to the profile. When I log in or log out, it gives
me an error saying some file cannot be written. When I check the
profiles folder on
If I use smbclient to create a tar file at /dev/null, it skips most of
the steps. This behavior
If I type something like this:
smbclient '\\puffin\c$' -U 'amanda%password' -E -d1 -Tca /dev/null
'/Kathy/DATA/2120 WNmod/*'
I receive the following message:
Output is /dev/null, assuming dry_run
I have a little home network that uses an Epson C82 served out via Samba
from an RH9 Linux box. When I set this up a year ago, the only way I
could get printing to work was through a raw Cups queue. (Well,
actually, I never tried anything but CUPS). It all worked well enough,
except for an a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is a preview release of the Samba 3.0.12 code base and
is provided for testing only. This release is *not* intended
for production servers. However, there have been several bug
fixes and new features added since 3.0.11 that we feel are
important
Hi Gerry,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
this is really a last resort as I'm literally pulling my hair
out over AIX and Samba and cannot find any threads on this particular
issue.
Basically we have 3 systems running AIX 5.1 and Samba 2.2.7
We upgraded one system to Aix 5.2 and everything works no p
For Win2K, I've been using RunDLL32 printui.dll,printuientry to do a bunch
of different printer related stuff (most notably, mapping printers and
setting the default).
Looks like NT4 doesn't have the same stuff. Is there anything classier I
can use than NET USE under NT4 (without downloading so
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:-
thanx for ur mail
i will immediately reply, when i will be on line.
bye till then.
with best wishes.
Rakesh Mohanty( Off Line)
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/sa
|
| You're foolish if you think anyone with local
| access to a workstation can't get into the
| Admin account on their local machine.
WoW! That was a really helpful response!
And while correct, doesn't do anything to help
the original poster.
If I have an employee and I'll them I'm not
going to
64 matches
Mail list logo
