seemonkey wrote:
But it would close the vulnerability in nss. If one would release a seamonkey
let's say 2.40.1 only with the change of nss 3.21.1 the result would be the
same as i described. I didn't mention any bug in the base product. The whole
topic was started with nss and not bugs/sec vu
On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 10:10:15 PM UTC+2, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
> I wouldn't start hacking together a version with different binaries. Might
> work
> might not. And this won't close any bugs in the base product which could be
> exploited if you are so concerned about security.
>
>
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote on 18/10/2016 22:03:
I wouldn't start hacking together a version with different binaries. Might work
might not. And this won't close any bugs in the base product which could be
exploited if you are so concerned about security.
Ok, I will stay with my official SM 2.40 wi
I wouldn't start hacking together a version with different binaries. Might work
might not. And this won't close any bugs in the base product which could be
exploited if you are so concerned about security.
Better check if the latest en-US candidate 2.46 test builds works for you or
use
Adrians
On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 9:59:26 PM UTC+2, Ray_Net wrote:
> Lee wrote on 16/10/2016 17:45:
> > On 10/16/16, Ray_Net wrote:
> >> seemonkey wrote on 13/10/2016 08:06:
> >>> There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS
> >>> version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/
On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:59:19 +0200, Ray_Net
wrote:
>Lee wrote on 16/10/2016 17:45:
>> On 10/16/16, Ray_Net wrote:
>>> seemonkey12...@gmail.com wrote on 13/10/2016 08:06:
There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS
version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/
Lee wrote on 16/10/2016 17:45:
On 10/16/16, Ray_Net wrote:
seemonkey12...@gmail.com wrote on 13/10/2016 08:06:
There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS
version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950
There was a bugfix in NSS
https://b
On 10/16/16, Ray_Net wrote:
> seemonkey12...@gmail.com wrote on 13/10/2016 08:06:
>> There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS
>> version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950
>>
>> There was a bugfix in NSS
>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org
seemonkey12...@gmail.com wrote on 13/10/2016 08:06:
There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS
version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950
There was a bugfix in NSS https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1245528
to solve this is
WaltS48 wrote:
On 10/14/2016 08:49 PM, Edward wrote:
TCW wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:06:52 -0700 (PDT), seemonkey12...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from
this NSS version:
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950
There w
On 10/14/2016 08:49 PM, Edward wrote:
TCW wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:06:52 -0700 (PDT), seemonkey12...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this
NSS version:
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950
There was a bugfix in
On Saturday, October 15, 2016 at 2:49:48 AM UTC+2, Edward wrote:
> TCW wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:06:52 -0700 (PDT), seemonkey
> > wrote:
> >
> >> There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS
> >> version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-20
On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 3:10:42 PM UTC+2, TCW wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:06:52 -0700 (PDT), seemonkey
>
> >There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS
> >version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950
> >
> >There was a bugfix
TCW wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:06:52 -0700 (PDT), seemonkey12...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS
version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950
There was a bugfix in NSS https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_b
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:06:52 -0700 (PDT), seemonkey12...@gmail.com
wrote:
>There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS
>version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950
>
>There was a bugfix in NSS https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
There's at least one security vulnerability that is missing from this NSS
version: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-1950
There was a bugfix in NSS https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1245528
to solve this issue but unfortunately it seems that this bugfix is not
16 matches
Mail list logo