Hello Maxim,
Saturday, March 8, 2008, 5:04:46 PM, you wrote:
MM> What's new in 4.0.16.2 since 4.0.16.1:
MM> [-] The MSI didn't set the registry settings correctly to make The Bat!
default mail client
Confirmed as fixed! :))
--
Best regards,
Charles mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Hello Marck,
Friday, March 7, 2008, 11:26:04 AM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear Dwight,
MDP> @7-Mar-2008, 11:23 -0600 (07-Mar 17:23 here) Dwight Corrin [DC] in
MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
>>> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6749
MDP> NB: *Removes*!!! I manually edit the registry se
Hello Marck,
Friday, March 7, 2008, 8:45:52 AM, you wrote:
MDP> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6749
MDP> Confirmed STILL broken!
MDP> This issue is far from fixed. There is no change. The installer
MDP> removes TB from the default clients list as before.
Confirmed here as well. The fo
Hello Volker,
Monday, February 25, 2008, 12:46:03 PM, you wrote:
VA> [Reply to: »Rick Grunwald« · 2008-02-25 · 17:31 h (CET)]
VA> Moin, Rick!
To duplicate, try and reposition your tool bar, and then try to put
it back where it was originally.
VA> Take a look again at the attached scr
Hello Miroslav,
Monday, February 25, 2008, 1:53:58 AM, you wrote:
MF> this behavior seem similar to the following bug entry, perhaps the same
MF> problem?
MF> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6761
It could possibly be related. I don't know if it's the same though.
--
Best regards,
Hello Tbbeta,
I just noticed something in the version that doesn't seem right. If
you abort the downloading of messages and answer yes to wait for the
currently incoming message to be completed, and then try to close TB.
TB closes without waiting for the message to finish. Prior versions
would p
Hello Peter,
Monday, February 25, 2008, 1:30:04 AM, you wrote:
>> user reported me, sometimes it has TB duplicated in Taskbar, anybody can
>> confirm? User has Windows Vista build 6000 and 4.0.14.3.
PF> I can confirm.
PF> (I do not have minimise to tray)
I can confirm as well, although it doe
Hello Charles,
CH> be because we have used the registry patch. Until the nest MSI comes
Now, if only TB had a grammar checker! :)) ^^^
--
Best regards,
Charles mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The Bat! E-Ma
Hello Marck,
Sunday, February 24, 2008, 5:38:40 PM, you wrote:
MM>> I have reopened https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6749, I can not
MDP> It's a tough one to check completely until the next MSI build is out,
MDP> since that is responsible for the primary associations and client
MDP> regist
Hello Serge,
Thursday, February 21, 2008, 7:32:55 PM, you wrote:
SB> SSCE spellchecker still doesn't work for me on my Vista 64 machine.
SB> Brakes as soon as even one file is copied to the Speller directory
SB> (for example userdic.tlx). See
SB> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6745 .
Vis
Hello Maggie,
Wednesday, February 20, 2008, 9:09:37 AM, you wrote:
MM> Hello Tbbeta,
MM> I'm told that the red checkmark in this icon is an old MS
MM> style from the early days.
MM> The logic of it is nice: the ABC meaning Spell, and the checkmark
MM> meaning Check.
MM> But what is n
Hello Dwight,
Tuesday, February 19, 2008, 9:59:41 PM, you wrote:
DAC> On Tuesday, February 19, 2008, 9:31:26 PM, Dwight Corrin wrote:
>>> Looks like you don't have 'Automatic checking' selected.
>> then you didn't look at the pull down where the check mark is. that
>> is the whole point of the
Hello Dwight,
Tuesday, February 19, 2008, 9:31:26 PM, you wrote:
DC> On Tuesday, February 19, 2008, 7:06:34 PM, MAU wrote:
>> Looks like you don't have 'Automatic checking' selected.
DC> then you didn't look at the pull down where the check mark is. that
DC> is the whole point of the graphic.
Hello Marek,
Tuesday, February 19, 2008, 9:16:16 AM, you wrote:
MM> Hello,
MM> as You can see in attached screenshot, when message with less tabs is
MM> displayed after message with more tabs, previous tabs are not correctly
MM> cleared.
Confirmed here.
--
Best regards,
Charles mailto:[EM
Hello MAU,
Saturday, February 16, 2008, 12:57:09 PM, you wrote:
M> Hello Charles,
M>>> Fully agree! Because they may be automatically imported to your
M>>> Registry without you even noticing.
>>
>> You should open the file for editing...
M> Not me. Aside of the fact that I don't use Vista, I
Hello MAU,
Saturday, February 16, 2008, 9:10:40 AM, you wrote:
M> Hello Thomas,
DAC>>> My security system comes completely unglued when I try to open
DAC>>> that file.
>>
>> You should not just click on .reg files.
M> Fully agree! Because they may be automatically imported to your
M> Registry
Hello Gunivortus,
Friday, February 15, 2008, 11:43:13 PM, you wrote:
GG> Hi Charles,
GG>>> When will TB be able to get back in the list of default programs in
GG>>> Vista?
GG>>> As long as it isn't in the list, mailto: links in other apllications
GG>>> can't call TB.
>> I posted a temporary fi
Hello Charles,
GG>> When will TB be able to get back in the list of default programs in
GG>> Vista?
GG>> As long as it isn't in the list, mailto: links in other apllications
GG>> can't call TB.
CH> I posted a temporary fix (mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]).
CH> Although you might have to edit the reg file
Hello Gunivortus,
Friday, February 15, 2008, 4:16:57 AM, you wrote:
GG> Hi Max,
>> The Bat! 4.0.14.1 is available at
GG> When will TB be able to get back in the list of default programs in
GG> Vista?
GG> As long as it isn't in the list, mailto: links in other apllications
GG> can't call TB.
I
Hello Marck,
Monday, February 11, 2008, 1:11:53 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear Charles,
CH>> Here is a registry fix that I used to fix the problem.
MDP> That won't load on mine - and I've not got TB installed to the
MDP> default locations.
The registry file is for a default installation. You will
y, February 7, 2008, 3:52:48 PM, you wrote:
CH>>>> Hello Marck,
CH>>>> Wednesday, February 6, 2008, 5:08:33 PM, you wrote:
MDP>>>>> Dear Charles,
MDP>>>>> @6-Feb-2008, 15:58 -0600 (06-Feb 21:58 here) Charles Hinchliffe [CH]
MDP>>>>>
y, February 6, 2008, 5:08:33 PM, you wrote:
MDP>>>> Dear Charles,
MDP>>>> @6-Feb-2008, 15:58 -0600 (06-Feb 21:58 here) Charles Hinchliffe [CH]
MDP>>>> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
CH>>>>> Both 4.00.20 and 4.00.21 will NOT install itself as the defau
2008, 15:58 -0600 (06-Feb 21:58 here) Charles Hinchliffe [CH]
MDP>>> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
CH>>>> Both 4.00.20 and 4.00.21 will NOT install itself as the default email
CH>>>> program in Vista. TB does not check that it is the default client,
CH>>>&
Hello Charles,
Thursday, February 7, 2008, 3:52:48 PM, you wrote:
CH> Hello Marck,
CH> Wednesday, February 6, 2008, 5:08:33 PM, you wrote:
MDP>> Dear Charles,
MDP>> @6-Feb-2008, 15:58 -0600 (06-Feb 21:58 here) Charles Hinchliffe [CH]
MDP>> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] s
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, February 6, 2008, 5:08:33 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear Charles,
MDP> @6-Feb-2008, 15:58 -0600 (06-Feb 21:58 here) Charles Hinchliffe [CH]
MDP> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
CH>> Both 4.00.20 and 4.00.21 will NOT install itself as the default email
CH>
Hello Marck,
Wednesday, February 6, 2008, 5:08:33 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear Charles,
MDP> @6-Feb-2008, 15:58 -0600 (06-Feb 21:58 here) Charles Hinchliffe [CH]
MDP> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
CH>> Both 4.00.20 and 4.00.21 will NOT install itself as the default email
CH>
Hello Tbbeta,
Both 4.00.20 and 4.00.21 will NOT install itself as the default email
program in Vista. TB does not check that it is the default client,
even though the option is checked in Preferences. Also, the file
.eml, .msg, .vcf and mailto: associations do not work. I would
consider this a
Hello Marck,
Tuesday, February 5, 2008, 6:34:33 PM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear Maxim,
MDP> @6-Feb-2008, 01:27 +0200 (05-Feb 23:27 here) Maxim Masiutin [MM] in
MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MM>>
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/thebat_pro_4-0-0-20-beta.msi
MDP> Another snag.
M
Hello Jim,
Sunday, February 3, 2008, 11:45:23 AM, you wrote:
>>> Hello All,
>>> I'm wondering whether those people who's experiencing problems with
>>> the spell checker are starting TB! from another directory (the
>>> %EMAIL% one, for example). Maybe it worth to try to set the "Start
>>> in"
Hello Rick,
Sunday, February 3, 2008, 6:33:53 AM, you wrote:
>> Hello Rick,
>> Saturday, February 2, 2008, 2:33:33 PM, you wrote:
Warsaw/PL, Saturday, February 2, 2008
Hello Rick,
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, at 14:45:04 (which was 20:45 where I live)
>>
Hello Rick,
Saturday, February 2, 2008, 2:33:33 PM, you wrote:
>> Warsaw/PL, Saturday, February 2, 2008
>> Hello Rick,
>> On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, at 14:45:04 (which was 20:45 where I live)
>> in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
RG>>> I am still getting the same err
Hello Peter,
Sunday, January 27, 2008, 6:24:25 AM, you wrote:
PH> Answering a current message (Sunday, January 27, 2008, 11:52)
PH> Hello Jens,
JF>> why isn't it possible to hide search with another CTRL-F again ???
PH> I stumbled over the same thing. Just the force of habit.
PH> Although we
Hello Henk,
Friday, January 11, 2008, 1:44:27 PM, you wrote:
HMdB> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, at 13:33:29 [GMT -0600] (which was 20:33 where I
HMdB> live) Charles Hinchliffe wrote:
>> Hello Tbbeta,
HMdB> Who's calling?
Sorry, I must have sent that by accident and didn'
Hello Tbbeta,
--
Best regards,
Charles mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
The Bat! E-Mail System version 4.0.0.9 (ALPHA) on Windows Vista
AntispamSniper for the Bat! 2.7.1.5
__
Hello Marek,
Monday, December 31, 2007, 7:03:09 PM, you wrote:
> Hello all,
> Tuesday, January 1, 2008, Charles Hinchliffe wrote:
>> Folder compression is not working (it worked in 4.0.0.4). Also, the size
>> column in the
>> folder pane is not updating (in 4.
Hello Maxim,
Sunday, December 30, 2007, 9:41:28 PM, you wrote:
Folder compression is not working (it worked in 4.0.0.4). Also, the size
column in the
folder pane is not updating (in 4.0.0.4 you had to run the
maintainance center twice in order to get it to update the column.)
This has been rep
36 matches
Mail list logo