On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> No need for every thread to have its own name, right?
pthread_set_name_np()? Would be nice to have that reflect into "ps H"
output if it's used in real programs. Linux calls that function
pthread_setname_np(), so maybe it's actually in use.
No need for every thread to have its own name, right?
(And can I say, wow, is every arch except i386 generous with the
debug output?)
Index: arch/alpha/alpha/interrupt.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/alpha/alpha/interrupt.c,v
retri
On 02/03/2014 10:12 PM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> I'd run with acpi debug enabled, try to see if we are dropping an event.
On a 5.4 test system I compiled a new generic MP kernel with "option ACPI_DEBUG"
and booted it. I set up a serial console.
During boot there is a lot a ACPI debug output. I can ma
Which license is this patch under?
On 3 February 2014 13:26:41 GMT+00:00, Sebastian Trahm
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>the following diff addresses CVE-2012-3509
>(libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow).
>
>
>Index: include/objalloc.h
>
this is a (somewhat late) follow-up on the ACPI buttonpress event problem...
This was on misc@, but tech@ seems more appropriate.
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:38:00 Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:08 PM, IMAP List Administration
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > some of you may remember a p
Hello,
the following diff addresses CVE-2012-3509
(libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow).
Index: include/objalloc.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/gnu/lib/libiberty/include/objalloc.h,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.3
di
Hi Eric,
On 02/03/2014 10:48 AM, Eric Faurot wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:36PM +0100, IMAP List Administration wrote:
>> [I forgot to send this to the list]
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 02/01/2014 11:43 AM, Eric Faurot wrote:
>>> The following diff fixes the problems with the example IPs you
> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 12:02:16 +0100
> From: IMAP List Administration
>
> Hello Folks,
>
> I've patched, recompiled and relinked libc. Are there any risks in
> installing it on a running production system? Do I need to reboot
> immediately after installation?
Depends on the patch... But ass
Hello Folks,
I've patched, recompiled and relinked libc. Are there any risks in installing it
on a running production system? Do I need to reboot immediately after
installation?
cheers,
Rob Urban
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:36PM +0100, IMAP List Administration wrote:
> [I forgot to send this to the list]
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 02/01/2014 11:43 AM, Eric Faurot wrote:
> > The following diff fixes the problems with the example IPs you gave us.
> > - subsequent PTR records are now set as alias
10 matches
Mail list logo