Hi Mark:
Thank you for your response. That definitely answered my question.
Do you know what's the status on this issue? Is Tomcat not going to support the
relevant code before 4.1? It will be a huge effort (if possible) to work around
the problem using either of the ways described in the bug
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 8:53 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk performance
>
> KEREM ERKAN wrote:
> > Tomcat is harder to configure and -sadly- it has a far worse
> > documentation than Apache
hi list!
this is my first post to this list :)
i have searched this list's archives but could not find a lot about that topic
so i am posting it. i am not sure if this is really a tomcat issue; if it is
not i hope someone may point me the right direction.
i develop JSP applications (tomcat4, j
Well since I don't understand German, I don't konw how he tested.
However in my stress testing which lots of static and JSPs, I found
Apache + mod_jk performance is a littlle higher than TOMCAT only. I
configured Apache with mod_cache.
So I think only handling JSPs, TC only could be better than Ap
梁炳場 wrote:
After implementation of JDBCRealm,
how to retrieve the username in Servlet after login?
getRemoteUser()
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After implementation of JDBCRealm,
how to retrieve the username in Servlet after login?
Thanks
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Both client and server certificates are self certified by:
keytool -selfcert -alias server -keystore serverstore.jks
keytool -selfcert -alias client -keystore serverstore.jks
The problem still exists. When install the self certified client certificate in
IE6, put certificate in Personal Store, th
netstat -an results (snippet)
Proto Local Address Foreign AddressState
TCP166.70.163.138:80 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
TCP166.70.163.138:139 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
TCP166.70.163.138:2109166.70.163.131:2433ESTABLISHED
TCP166.70
If you do a netstat -ln (cygwin) do you see two network sockets
listening on port 80?
166.70.163.138:80
166.70.163.140:80
If not, the problem is at a lower level than tomcat.
Steve
Barnett, Brian W. wrote:
I have two elements defined like this in my server.xml file, each
one listening
KEREM ERKAN wrote:
Tomcat is harder to configure and -sadly- it has a far worse documentation
than Apache (for now).
I look forward to seeing your documentation patches in Bugzilla ;)
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Xia, Hong wrote:
Hi, Mark,
I have the both server and client .cer imported to cacerts but the problem
persists
commands to generate the server and client key:
Keytool -genkey -alias server -keyalg RSA -keystore serverstore.jks
Keytool -genkey -alias client -keyalg RSA -keystore clientstore.jks
Sastry Malladi wrote:
I filed a bug for this
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35835) and it seems
this is fixed in 5.5.10. But I don't see a 5.5.10 download and wanted
clarification on whether 5.5.11-alpha
contains the fix as well. I'm going to check it out anyways when I get
> From: David Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Can't change servlet path
>
> I'm not understanding something here I think. On (1) you say
> (I think) that I must put in server.xml for the path
> attribute. But in (2) you tell me (I think) to not put
> in server.xml?
>
> What a
Hi;
We have some ASP stuff too so we have to have IIS.
I think I'll just put my servlet in root and stop trying to change what root
is (yuck).
Thanks - dave
-Original Message-
From: Parsons Technical Services [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 10:45 PM
To: Tom
I have two elements defined like this in my server.xml file, each
one listening to a different IP address and serving requests for different
web sites. (Using 5.0.28)
Hi;
I'm not understanding something here I think. On (1) you say (I think) that
I must put in server.xml for the path attribute. But in (2) you
tell me (I think) to not put in server.xml?
What am I not getting here?
Thanks - dave
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:
I have two issues relating to sessions:
1) Sessions seem to be expired too soon. This happens very
infrequently for me (perhaps 1 in 1000 requests). I'm adding some
HttpSessionListeners and HttpSessionAttributeListeners to attempt to
locate this problem, but have little to go on at the moment.
Hassan,
Well, maybe I misunderstood the original question :-)
No, it's just me unfamiliar with the idea of contexts.
So far I've figured out that there is a file context.xml that can define
extra parameters for an application, but I'm not sure about:
1) Whether it's possible to direct two c
Just my 2 cents:
Have you tried putting it under shared/lib?
Also, are you sure it's a .jar and not a .zip extension for you file?
Am using here an oracle connector in various webapp. The driver is
under common/lib of tomcat 5.5.7 and i have no problems, so i bet this
is the right location Perha
Hi fellas,
I'm working on Tomcat 5.5.7 on a webapp compiled by Ant using shared and common
libraries in their respective tomcat folders.
My mysql driver (mysql-connector-java-3.1.10-bin.jar) is in the
$CATALINA_HOME/common/lib/ folder and I still get the following message :
Cannot load JDBC dr
> -Original Message-
> From: Lionel Farbos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 5:49 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Cc: KEREM ERKAN
> Subject: Re: mod_jk performance
>
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:27:29 +0300
> KEREM ERKAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > > >
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:27:29 +0300
KEREM ERKAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Well, mod_jk > 1.2.10 seems slower than 1.2.10 when stress
> > tested. The
> > > tests completed in more time. I do not have the actual test
> > results,
> > > because we have been using 1.2.10 for several month
> > Well, mod_jk > 1.2.10 seems slower than 1.2.10 when stress
> tested. The
> > tests completed in more time. I do not have the actual test
> results,
> > because we have been using 1.2.10 for several months, maybe
> I can send
> > them when I test 1.2.14.
> >
> I'm interested in such test
So, I think your solution with F5 BigIPs->Tomcat is equivalent to the solution
with Apache/mod_jk->Tomcat
But the last is free
and I don't know the difference in performances between the 2 solutions.
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:14:01 +0200
Andrew Miehs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We run F5 BigIPs as
Hi, Mark,
I forgot to mention that if set 'clientAuth=false' in the Connector, https
works with server certificate. The problem happens only with 'clientAuth=true'.
What key type is IE6 requires for installing certificate as Personal?
Thanks again.
Hong
-Original Message-
From: Mark Th
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:16:59 +0300
KEREM ERKAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, mod_jk > 1.2.10 seems slower than 1.2.10 when stress tested. The tests
> completed in more time. I do not have the actual test results, because we
> have been using 1.2.10 for several months, maybe I can send them wh
Hi Mark,
> Take a look at how form authenticator does it. See
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/authenticator/FormAuthenticator.java?rev=1.24&view=markup
>
> and the SavedRequest class in the same package.
>
> Note that the way thi
Hi, Mark,
I have the both server and client .cer imported to cacerts but the problem
persists
commands to generate the server and client key:
Keytool -genkey -alias server -keyalg RSA -keystore serverstore.jks
Keytool -genkey -alias client -keyalg RSA -keystore clientstore.jks
commands to creat
Well, mod_jk > 1.2.10 seems slower than 1.2.10 when stress tested. The tests
completed in more time. I do not have the actual test results, because we
have been using 1.2.10 for several months, maybe I can send them when I test
1.2.14.
By the way mod_jk site mentions 1.2.13 as its testing version.
We run F5 BigIPs as our loadbalancers, and have seperated images, etc
onto another server
IE: i.domain.com for images, and www.domain.com for dynamic content.
F5 provides a feature call iRules to do the splitting between hosts
for you, but I would
NOT use this on a high traffic site.
Andre
KEREM ERKAN wrote:
OK, start with downloading and installing a binary version of Tomcat for
your OS and also download the 1.2.10 version of mod_jk. I think we should
handle the rest off list not to bother the list anymore.
Just to give you another option if you like. I don't even use mod_jd.
But, in a web site, there is never only JSPs : there is a lot of static files
(images, css, js, ...)
So, if you don't have a apache in the frontend to deliver theses static files,
there is an overload for the TC server...
So, your tests stressed only light JSPs or a real site ?
and what is your
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:55:08 +0300
KEREM ERKAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mod_jk > 1.2.10 had some performance problems
> but I did not thoroughly test why.
Is is proved ? Where do you find this ?
I tested mod_jk 1.2.14 (but not stressed it) and it seems to be a good
version...
What sort of p
We did some comparisons between running Tomcat 5.0 standalone, or TC
5.0 and Apache 2.0
If you are ONLY delivering JSPs, we found that we could only deal
with 50% of the requests when running combined Apache TC and mod_jk
Andrew
On Sep 14, 2005, at 2:45 PM, Lionel Farbos wrote:
I use Apa
I use Apache/mod_jk/Tomcat for a long time on production servers with load
balancing/failover (and with high traffic sites) and I'm sure it's not 30%
slower than a pure Tomcat.
I use Apache to deliver static files, manage SSL and other apache specifics
modules.
Then, Tomcat only manage dynamics
> -Original Message-
> From: Hassan Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:30 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk performance
>
> KEREM ERKAN wrote:
> > Apache has better directory/file restricting and handling
> than Tomcat
>
> bette
KEREM ERKAN wrote:
Apache has better directory/file restricting and handling than Tomcat
better in what way? What actual *security* issue are we talking
about -- in other words, what exploit is Tomcat susceptible to
that Apache is not?
--
Hassan Schroeder - [EMAIL P
Apache is easier to configure, but at a 50% performance hit for pure
JSP pages
Andrew
On Sep 14, 2005, at 2:18 PM, KEREM ERKAN wrote:
Apache has better directory/file restricting and handling than
Tomcat, it is
more customizable and it is much user/admin friendly to
configure :-) (a
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Flynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:40 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: How to serve just JSP (was: Re: JSP on RHEL4
> with Apache http d RPM?
>
> On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 12:19, KEREM ERKAN wrote:
> > >
> >
Eickvonder Bjoern wrote:
Hello,
my webapplication consists of a rather small set of classes, jsps and so
on but has got a rather large content directory (some GB). My problem is
now if I want to update only the application itself but not the content
by uploading a new war-file I nevertheless hav
Apache has better directory/file restricting and handling than Tomcat, it is
more customizable and it is much user/admin friendly to configure :-) (at
least for me)
I configure all security related stuff on Apache and have my Tomcat listen
only on AJP connector with 127.0.0.1:8009.
Tomcat is hard
Kerem,
You are probably right, I personnaly never faced any issues with any of
them.
However, Tom can you be more specific about the type of traffic your app
has to serve and what are performance/response time requirements.
Hardware and network, server and JVM configuration can also be either a
b
KEREM ERKAN wrote:
... I am looking to the security side of the problem and
Apache+mod_jk does its job better than only Tomcat concerning security.
How so?
--
Hassan Schroeder - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 === http://webtuitive.com
marc ratun wrote:
Hi,
I just read an article about webapp benchmarks [1] and they mentioned that
apache+mod_jk+tomcat is about 30% slower than pure tomcat.
This is sad. Until now I believed that the performance decrease with
apache/mod_jk would be marginal.
Why would that be sad?
30% perform
AFAIK mod_proxy performs worse than mod_jk.
Just my 2 cents.
Kerem
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruno Georges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:58 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Cc: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Re: mod_jk performance
>
> Marc
Marc
If the performance of your app is not acceptable using mod_jk , you could
try other alternatives and still keep apache in front to serve static
content and use other modules.
You can use apache mod_proxy to forward request on 8080 [or whatever your
run tomcat on] to tomcat without going throu
Well I tried both, and as my websites do not have a very high traffic (I
have approximately a total of 50 GB per month) the speed is not primarily a
concern to me, I am looking to the security side of the problem and
Apache+mod_jk does its job better than only Tomcat concerning security.
I have st
Hi,
I just read an article about webapp benchmarks [1] and they mentioned that
apache+mod_jk+tomcat is about 30% slower than pure tomcat.
This is sad. Until now I believed that the performance decrease with
apache/mod_jk would be marginal.
Putting apache/mod_jk before tomcat is very nice. I don
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 12:19, KEREM ERKAN wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately I have to keep the main port 80 httpd, as it's
> > serving 20Gb of other material (the entire campus web site).
> >
> > All I need is the trick to make Apache httpd hand off any
> > .jsp files to Tomcat.
> >
> As I am newly
Did you make sure that the manager Context is defined somewhere?
Take a look into server.xml, perhaps you find a outcommented declaration
there.
Am Mittwoch, den 14.09.2005, 03:50 -0700 schrieb V.K.M.RAJA:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your prompt reply. Yes i did restarted the server.
Alain Gaeremynck wrote:
I have 2 webapps living on the same server and they are linked to the
same user experiance.. Now both apps require login but i don't want
my users to have to login on both apps. Also while they are browsing
in one context i don't want the session to expire for the oth
>
> Unfortunately I have to keep the main port 80 httpd, as it's
> serving 20Gb of other material (the entire campus web site).
>
> All I need is the trick to make Apache httpd hand off any
> .jsp files to Tomcat.
>
As I am newly subscribed to this list, I don't know if you have got a
satisfac
Hi Alain,
First of all the session is ALWAYS on application scope, this is not an
Tomcat specific behaviour but a requirement of the Specification:
"SRV.7.3 Session Scope
HttpSession objects must be scoped at the application (or servlet context)
level.
The underlying mechanism, such as the cookie
Hi people,
I use Tomcat 5.5.9 with Apache 2.0.54 and jk 1.2.10 to serve my websites. I
want to set custom error pages to be served when an error like 404, 500 etc.
occurs. The website uses the iso-8859-9 character set on every page, and the
error pages are encoded with iso-8859-9 too.
Only *.js
> From: rahul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> We are three people working on three different application which
> are deployed on a single remote machine
> We all want to remotely debug our application.
>
> Is it possible with one instance of tomcat? (I think no)
At the same time? Not to my knowled
hi all,
We are three people working on three different application which
are deployed on a single remote machine
We all want to remotely debug our application.
Is it possible with one instance of tomcat? (I think no)
If not, then there is only one solution
which is running multiple instance of
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 10:17, Michael Lai wrote:
> Peter Flynn wrote:
> >If Tomcat doesn't have any such webapp, where do I get one?
> >I certainly can't write one, as I'm not a Java programmer.
> >
>
> I am limited in my knowledge of tomcat but from my understanding, tomcat
> can be ran either as
Hello,
Thanks for your prompt reply. Yes i did restarted the server.
Actually i am using tomcat which is comming bundled with Netbean4.1.
Even after resarting i am not able to access these links.
-
Yahoo! for Good
Click here to
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 06:19, V.K.M.RAJA wrote:
did you restart tc?
> Hello ,
>
>I am new to Tomcat and i am finding some difficulty handling
> Tomcat. I am not able to login into the manager or the administrator link.
> I have username= "cdac" and password ="cdac" and with mana
Hello ,
I am new to Tomcat and i am finding some difficulty handling Tomcat.
I am not able to login into the manager or the administrator link. I have
username= "cdac" and password ="cdac" and with manager roles in the
tomcat-users.xml file . Kindly help
__
Hi Peter,
Peter Crowther wrote:
> There was a similar thread a couple of months back. The conclusion of
> that thread was that you cannot clone the original or create a new
> request, and that there are sound architectural reasons for this.
> Instead, you'll have to do it the "proper" way - sto
Peter Flynn wrote:
If you have a tomcat webapp that serves jsp's such as
http://localhost:8080/mywebapp, then you can map jsp requests to that
webapp using JkMount /mywebapp/*.jsp
Ah...this exposes the gap in my understanding.
Where do I get a "tomcat webapp that serves jsp's"?
This is
Hi!
For TC 5.5.x, put the name-value-pairs of all elements
inside the Resource start tag as attributes.
Good luck!
Am Mittwoch, den 14.09.2005, 16:30 +0800 schrieb Michael Lai:
> I have a MySQL database in which I created a database named, javatest,
> and I am using Tomcat 5.5.9. I have una
[Sorry for the repost but I still don't have an answer to this one]
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 15:50, Steve Dodge wrote:
> 1.is an apache http server directive.
Right, but it was put there by Tomcat's auto-config. What I was trying
to find out was, by "localhost" did Tomcat mean "my (Tomcat's)
Hello,
my webapplication consists of a rather small set of classes, jsps and so
on but has got a rather large content directory (some GB). My problem is
now if I want to update only the application itself but not the content
by uploading a new war-file I nevertheless have to upload the content
aga
I have a MySQL database in which I created a database named, javatest,
and I am using Tomcat 5.5.9. I have unable to connect my database using
Java's DataSource method. Here is my ROOT.xml setup for my application
context:
username
javauser
Hi I suspect I am running into this bug in tomcat 5.5.9 which has been
solved in tomcat 5.5.11 and I was wondering if there is a workaround:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22617
Let me first explain my situation. I have a webapplication which we use
in production on multiple
67 matches
Mail list logo