JK Binary:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.2
/bin/linux/i386/
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: module "mod_jk.c&qu
Server built: Feb 13 2003 16:40:32
Tomcat is: jakarta-tomcat-3.3.1a.tar.gz
mod_jk.so is: mod_jk-3.3-ap20.so
The error is:
[root@localhost libexec]# /usr/local/apache2/bin/apachectl start
httpd: module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with this version of Apache (found
2001
86/mod_jk-2.0.42.so
> )in /etc/http/modules and renamed the file to mod_jk.so. I have also set it to the
>proper permissions (755).
> >
> > I also put the following lines in httpd.conf
> >
> > LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
> >
> > #AddModule
d_jk.so. I have also set it to the proper permissions (755).
I also put the following lines in httpd.conf
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
#AddModule mod_jk.c
JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd2/conf/workers.properties
JkLogFile /var/log/httpd/mod_jk.log
JkLogLevel info
I then tried to restart Apache. H
86/mod_jk-2.0.42.so
> )in /etc/http/modules and renamed the file to mod_jk.so. I have also set it to the
>proper permissions (755).
> >
> > I also put the following lines in httpd.conf
> >
> > LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
> >
> > #AddModule
AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Trying to setup Tomcat with Apache in Linux: module "mod_jk.c"
is not compatible with this version of Apache
Andres -
What version of Apache are you using? Generally, you have to match the
mod_jk version to Apache. Apache 2.0.40 is not compatible w
/release/v1.2.1/bin/linux/i386/mod_jk-2.0.42.so )in /etc/http/modules and renamed the file to mod_jk.so. I have also set it to the proper permissions (755).
I also put the following lines in httpd.conf
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
#AddModule mod_jk.c
JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd2/conf
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
#AddModule mod_jk.c
JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd2/conf/workers.properties
JkLogFile /var/log/httpd/mod_jk.log
JkLogLevel info
I then tried to restart Apache. However, it did not start and gave me
the error message:
Starting httpd: httpd: module "mod_jk.
See, I knew there was something I didn't understand. Thanks. I'll take a
look. :)
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 12:42 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with ve
l [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 3:32 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
> Yeah ... I saw that you sent me the link for mod_jk
> compatible with Apache
> 2.0.43. But, I already have
omcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
There are binaries for Apache 2.0.43, all over the place.
http://httpd.apache.org
I gave you a link to the binary Red Hat-compatible RPM for 2.0.43 so that
you could upgrade your RH 2.0.40 installation.
I gave you
just don't see what else you need.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:54 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
> Actually, I was jus
s of mod_jk for 2.0.40? It seems like an out-of-sync
doulbe whammy!
:(
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:40 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
Sorry, you
m
Most RH mirrors will have it.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:20 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
> Yes, but when I go to the Lin
ild is not available. Is there something I
am missing? :(
Thanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 4:44 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
http://jakarta.apach
t Users List
> Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
>
>
> Thanks. I've never had to compile anything like this on
> Linux and am a
> little hesitant to do so (more of a windows guy to be
> honost). Do you know
> of any place that I could locate
hanks.
Neal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:23 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
You need Apache 2.0.43. .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't.
Or, yo
You need Apache 2.0.43. .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't.
Or, you can build your own.
John
-Original Message-
From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache
Does anyone know why I would get this error when installing mod_JK 2.0.43 on
Linux 8, with Tomcat 4.1 and Apache 2.0:
"mod_jk.c not compatible with this version of Apache".
I presume that when it refers to the "mod_jk.c" it is referring to the
cmopuled code it derives from th
oj Kithany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 2:14 PM
Subject: mod_jk.c Compilation Errors
> Hi Experts,
>
> Greetings!
>
> I am using Apache(1.3) and Tomcat (4.0.4) on IBM AIX (5.1) System.
> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:14:27PM +, Manoj Kithany wrote:
> /usr/bin/gcc -DPACKAGE=\"mod_jk\" -DVERSION=\"1.2.0\" -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -I.
> -I. -I../common -g -O2 -c mod_jk.c -DPIC -o .libs/mod_jk.lo
> mod_jk.c:71:
eally appreciate your
precious time. The Error is:
--
# make
Making all in common
Target "all" is up to date.
Making all in apache-1.3
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile /usr/bin/gcc -DPACKAGE=\"mod_jk\"
-DVERSION=\"1.2.0\" -DHAVE_DLFC
I can't get Tomcat to work hooked up to Apache for SuSE Linux:
In the /var/log/httpd/error_log file this shows up:
Cannot remove module mod_jk.c: not found in module list
Does anyone know what this means? Is this my problem? Is my
mod_jk.so not built correctly or something?
Pete
Turner
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: STEVE R BURRUS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 6:24 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk.c not compatible with Apache 2.0.39
>
>
> Greetings Eric, this is ste
me)$(ps)logs$(ps)inprocess.std
> >err
> >
> > At the end of httpd.conf I put:
> >
> > Include /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf
> >
> > JkWorkersFile
> > "/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.4/conf/jk/workers.properties" J
asking them. This doesn't help anyone.
The link to the file you want is HERE: http://www.acg-gmbh.de/mod_jk/
John Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: STEVE R BURRUS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 6:24 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk.
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: mod_jk.c not compatible with Apache 2.0.39
> Greetings Eric, this is steve burrus, you don't seem to know me at all,
but I was
> just wondering if u coul
kMount /examples ajp13
> JkMount /examples/* ajp13
>
> JkMount /jk ajp13
> JkMount /jk/* ajp13
>
> JkMount /cocoon ajp13
> JkMount /cocoon/* ajp13
>
> When I run apachectl configtest I get
>
> httpd: module "mod_jk.c" is not compatible with this versio
Perhaps this is a better question for tomcat-dev, but in mod_jk.c
there's a comment that says:
/*
* If you are not using SSL, comment out the following
* line. It will make apache run faster.
*/
#define ADD_SSL_INFO
I can find no reference to ADD_SSL_INFO to any other Tomcat or Apache
(
At 05:46 PM 4/16/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>No, you can't just rename DLL files. Windows stores a "library" name
>inside the DLL, and it gets bothered if the current DLL name doesn't match
>the name stored inside the DLL. mod_jk.so works as a DLL because it was
>built as mod_jk.so. So a more e
Title: RE: AddModule mod_jk.c
No, you can't just rename DLL files. Windows stores a "library" name inside the DLL, and it gets bothered if the current DLL name doesn't match the name stored inside the DLL. mod_jk.so works as a DLL because it was built as mod_jk.so. So
--
From: "Ellis Teer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: AddModule mod_jk.c
> Thanks Jeff and guyr,
>
> Can I rename the current mod_jk.dll to mod_jk.so? Are they identical and
it's
> just a name ex
on, 16 Apr 2001 10:12:31 -0700, Jeff Kilbride wrote:
> RE: AddModule mod_jk.c I believe they changed the extensions
>from .dll to ..so in Apache 1.3.15 and up.
>
> --jeff
>
> - Original Message -
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Title: RE: AddModule mod_jk.c
I believe they changed the extensions from .dll to
.so in Apache 1.3.15 and up.
--jeff
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 9:16
AM
Subject: RE: AddModule mod_jk.c
Title: RE: AddModule mod_jk.c
Windows doesn't require DLLs to have a .dll extension.
-Original Message-
From: e_teer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 4:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AddModule mod_jk.c
Hey Eric,
LoadModule loads the module
;>
>> --jeff
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "brian luk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 2:16 PM
>> Subject: AddModule mod_jk.c
>>
>>
>> > Hi,
>>
t; --jeff
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "brian luk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 2:16 PM
> Subject: AddModule mod_jk.c
>
>
> > Hi,
> > can any one tell me what's difference between
PM
Subject: AddModule mod_jk.c
> Hi,
> can any one tell me what's difference between the 2:
>
> LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so
> AddModule mod_jk.c
>
> i must load the jk module before i can connect to
> tomcat. I think tomcat works without AddModule
&g
Hi,
can any one tell me what's difference between the 2:
LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so
AddModule mod_jk.c
i must load the jk module before i can connect to
tomcat. I think tomcat works without AddModule
mod_jk.c, what's AddModule mod_jk.c use for? No use?
than
I am also new to mod_jk, but I think if you are running NT, you don't load
mod_jk.c. What you need is mod_jk.dll.
I could be wrong though. Like I said, I am new too. So take my advise in
your own risk...:)
Good luck.
Lifeng
-Original Message-
From: Chris Andreou [mailto:[
I am using NT, Apache 3.2.1 and Tomcat. Does anybody know why I get an
error by loading the mod_jk.c ?
Thanks
Chris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm getting the
following error when I try to compile mod_jk.c in HP UX 10. Did not find the
mentioned file anywhere in the source distribution, and nither on the
system.
gcc -DHPUX10 -DUSE_HSREGEX
-DUSE_EXPAT -I../lib/expat-lite -fpic
-DSHARED_MODULE -I/usr2/tranweb/apac
42 matches
Mail list logo
