pick on the
1 or 2 'killer' features.
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Petr Mladek
>To: hc.stoellin...@aon.at
>Cc: "users@global.libreoffice.org"
>Sent: Friday, 2 August 2013, 11:37
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] d
Heinrich Stoellinger píše v So 20. 07. 2013 v 17:26 +0200:
> Hello,
> I downloaded LO 4.1.0-RC3 yesterday. Looking at the files after tar -xvf ...
> I find that there still is no desktop-integration directory in the main
> installation tree of files. Is it meant to be like that?
The "desktop-integ
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:13:45 +0200, Kracked_P_P---webmaster
wrote:
On 07/27/2013 11:32 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
On 07/27/2013 08:16 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 27/07/13 15:36, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hi,
As a "first installment"...
- What goes wrong? Clicking on any of the icons for the vario
On 07/27/2013 11:32 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
On 07/27/2013 08:16 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 27/07/13 15:36, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hi,
As a "first installment"...
- What goes wrong? Clicking on any of the icons for the various
parts of LO
doesn't cause anything to come up. Also, there is no
On 07/27/2013 08:16 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 27/07/13 15:36, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hi,
As a "first installment"...
- What goes wrong? Clicking on any of the icons for the various parts
of LO
doesn't cause anything to come up. Also, there is no "LibreOffice"
icon for
the complete pack
On 27/07/13 15:36, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hi,
As a "first installment"...
- What goes wrong? Clicking on any of the icons for the various parts
of LO
doesn't cause anything to come up. Also, there is no "LibreOffice"
icon for
the complete package, only icons for the various parts...
-
That is why we need to include a dependency "script" to help install
everything that might be missing before you install LO. Not everyone
might have all the dependencies installed. I have one Linux Distro that
would tell me a list of the dependencies needed to install the package
but would n
Hi,
As a "first installment"...
- What goes wrong? Clicking on any of the icons for the various parts of LO
doesn't cause anything to come up. Also, there is no "LibreOffice" icon for
the complete package, only icons for the various parts...
- Yes, I DID delete LO befor trying to install 4.1 (
On 07/27/2013 08:11 AM, sun shine wrote:
On 27/07/13 10:53, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Mint 14?MATE or Cinnamon desktop environment? I run Ubuntu
12.04LTS with MATE.
So the desktop-integration now works properly without the extra step.
Yes, the Language Pack before the Help Pack wa
I've just installed 4.1 on Squeeze and no problems, although this was
using Gnome 2.* DE again.
Just a thought: if you have the space, time and patience, you could
install the Gnome DE (unless it's already installed by default?) and see
if you could install it through that DE. Or even Xfce4 ..
On 07/27/2013 03:49 AM, sun shine wrote:
The language pack must be installed before the help pack - I can't
recall having to do this in a given order before, but maybe I did for
previous versions.
Sorry about replying to own post, but have just seen the instruction on
the download site: do
On 27/07/13 11:10, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hello,
Not the rpm- but the deb-Version (32bit) on Debian-Wheezy-KDE 4.10.
IT STILL DOES NOT WORK!!!
Regards
Heinrich
Hello Heinrich
Seems like you have been experiencing difficulty with this version for
quite some time, IIRC?
However, despit
On 27/07/13 10:53, Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
Mint 14?MATE or Cinnamon desktop environment? I run Ubuntu
12.04LTS with MATE.
So the desktop-integration now works properly without the extra step.
Yes, the Language Pack before the Help Pack was something that I
remember hearing about
Hello,
Not the rpm- but the deb-Version (32bit) on Debian-Wheezy-KDE 4.10.
IT STILL DOES NOT WORK!!!
Regards
Heinrich
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:53:23 +0200, Kracked_P_P---webmaster
wrote:
Mint 14?MATE or Cinnamon desktop environment? I run Ubuntu 12.04LTS
with MATE.
So the desktop-integra
Mint 14?MATE or Cinnamon desktop environment? I run Ubuntu 12.04LTS
with MATE.
So the desktop-integration now works properly without the extra step.
Yes, the Language Pack before the Help Pack was something that I
remember hearing about back in 3.4.x days.
Has anyone installed the RPM
Hi Tom
Thanks for the heads up. Aside from some minor issues regarding
documentation and installation, it seems to work fine. Here's my
experience on Mint 14, FWIW:
The Read-Me still states:
"The following commands will install LibreOffice and the desktop
integration packages (you may just
Hi :)
Now that the 4.1.0 has been properly released you might find the proper release
has all the desktop integration sorted out now. it might be worth checking if
you are keen and have the time
Good luck and regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Italo Vignoli
On 07/20/2013 12:21 PM, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
On 20/07/2013 at 17:26, "Heinrich Stoellinger" wrote:
I downloaded LO 4.1.0-RC3 yesterday. Looking at the files after tar -xvf
... I find that there still is no desktop-integration directory in the
main installation tree of files. Is it meant to
Hi Girvin,
Sorry for jumping in but I read this text from you:
Girvin R. Herr wrote (22-07-13 20:50)
[...]
I cannot shed any light on this specific subject, since I am not using
any 4.x LO version. I am keeping with the stable 3.6+ series until
4.1.4+ is released.
[...]
The 4.0 series is no
Tom :)
>
> From: sun shine
>To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Monday, 22 July 2013, 15:09
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] desktop-integration
>
>
>Girvin
>
>This is a topic I have some interest in and have been following.
>
>While I am aware of the ca
Heinrich,
I am sorry. I misunderstood your intent. Yes, it does seem like a bug
and should be addressed.
I cannot shed any light on this specific subject, since I am not using
any 4.x LO version. I am keeping with the stable 3.6+ series until
4.1.4+ is released. Then I may try it, dependi
Girvin
This is a topic I have some interest in and have been following.
While I am aware of the capacity to run the soffice script from the
terminal and even creating a custom launcher for the Gnome, XFCE4 and in
Mint, Mate panels, what I am curious about is exactly why doing so is
even neces
Heinrich,
Have you tried bringing LibreOffice up with "soffice" in a terminal
shell, or unambiguously, "/opt/libreoffice4.1/program/soffice" (less
quotes, of course)?
If that works, then you could manually add a link in your menu or at
least an icon on your desktop.
soffice is the main libreoff
On 21/07/13 12:18, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hi,
Well, I suppose you have a MySQL database running? If so, you have to
define
an LO-Base-database (file->new database). Then you have to choose the
Native MySQL connection, server parameters (such as server name, MySQL-
database name, password,
Hi,
Well, I suppose you have a MySQL database running? If so, you have to define
an LO-Base-database (file->new database). Then you have to choose the
Native MySQL connection, server parameters (such as server name, MySQL-
database name, password, port (3306)). Let me know if you have any trouble
On 21/07/13 10:14, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hello,
Do you know whether the native MySQL connector works under LO 4.0.4?
If it does I will try THAT release, otherwise I will revert to 3.6.2 -
which works just fine.
Regards
H
Hi Heinrich
No I don't know specifically - if you tell me how t
Hello,
Do you know whether the native MySQL connector works under LO 4.0.4?
If it does I will try THAT release, otherwise I will revert to 3.6.2 -
which works just fine.
Regards
H
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 11:06:35 +0200, sun shine wrote:
On 21/07/13 09:34, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hello,
Th
On 21/07/13 09:34, Heinrich Stoellinger wrote:
Hello,
The system on which I am trying to get LO 4.1-RC3 to run is:
Linux Debian Wheezy with KDE 4.10, latest software levels.
I first removed LO 3.6.2 using "apt-get remove libreoffice*" and then
installed 4.1-RC3 using "dpkg- i *deb" from within
Hello,
The system on which I am trying to get LO 4.1-RC3 to run is:
Linux Debian Wheezy with KDE 4.10, latest software levels.
I first removed LO 3.6.2 using "apt-get remove libreoffice*" and then
installed 4.1-RC3 using "dpkg- i *deb" from within all three directories in
the correct sequence.
T
On 20/07/13 19:06, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
On 20/07/2013 at 19:51, "Kracked_P_P---webmaster"
wrote:
So we no longer have to do a separate install command for installing the
desktop menus? So one "sudo dpkg -i *.deb" is all we need?
Yes, this is how it is supposed to work.
(There are some bu
On 07/20/2013 02:06 PM, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
On 20/07/2013 at 19:51, "Kracked_P_P---webmaster"
wrote:
So we no longer have to do a separate install command for installing the
desktop menus? So one "sudo dpkg -i *.deb" is all we need?
Yes, this is how it is supposed to work.
(There are so
On 20/07/2013 at 19:51, "Kracked_P_P---webmaster"
wrote:
> So we no longer have to do a separate install command for installing the
> desktop menus? So one "sudo dpkg -i *.deb" is all we need?
Yes, this is how it is supposed to work.
(There are some bugs in rc3 that causes package conflicts w
On 20/07/2013 at 17:26, "Heinrich Stoellinger" wrote:
> I downloaded LO 4.1.0-RC3 yesterday. Looking at the files after tar -xvf
> ... I find that there still is no desktop-integration directory in the
> main installation tree of files. Is it meant to be like that?
You are obviously talking abou
Hello,
I downloaded LO 4.1.0-RC3 yesterday. Looking at the files after tar -xvf ...
I find that there still is no desktop-integration directory in the main
installation tree of files. Is it meant to be like that?
Regards
H. stoellinger
--
Erstellt mit Operas revolutionärem E-Mail-Modul: http://ww
34 matches
Mail list logo