On 18.04.2014, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> When I said "mail is sent to" above I should have said "which goes to"
> as I was simply quoting your explanation above.
> But I'm still puzzled by mydestination.
The direction in which the mail goes does not matter, actually. When a
mail "hits" your postfi
On 19 April 2014 04:31, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 10:40 PM, Digimer wrote:
>>
>> Please don't do that. Fedora is awesome, but it's a desktop OS, not a
>> server OS. The life cycle is way to short and it's not hardened like a
>> server-focused distro. RHEL/CentOS would make a much bette
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 10:07:11AM +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 19 April 2014 04:31, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> > On 04/15/2014 10:40 PM, Digimer wrote:
> >>
> >> Please don't do that. Fedora is awesome, but it's a desktop OS, not a
> >> server OS. The life cycle is way to short and it's not hardene
Thanks guys. I got it up and running. Had to start ypbind, but it
started up same as autofs.
I need to study up a bit more on systemd I can see.
Thanks
Chris Kottaridis
On 04/18/2014 04:48 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 16:30 -0500, Chris Kottaridis wrote:
>> On 04/18/2014 03:57 PM
On 19.04.2014 04:37, Someone wrote:
> Hi poma,
>
> I don't mean to be rude, but is English not your first language? It
> would help me a lot if you could annotate your commands and codes more
> with some explanatory prose. For example, I couldn't really figure out
> what you meant by...
It has to
My kernel got upgraded along with everything else in a run of "sudo yum
update", and my sound started working again.. yay!! :)
Thanks for your tips.
On 04/19/2014 06:37 PM, poma wrote:
> On 19.04.2014 04:37, Someone wrote:
>> Hi poma,
>>
>> I don't mean to be rude, but is English not your first l
Rick Stevens wrote:
>> Fedora is, by definition, bleeding edge.
Ralf Corsepius:
> No, Fedora is not supposed to the bleeding edge. It's supposed to be the
> cutting edge, with some occasional warts sometimes.
I would say, by way of what it actually is, it is bleeding edge. But
you're arguing ov
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:40:40AM -0400, David wrote:
> My question is/was "And yet you are still 'here'?" Bitching about Fedora?
>
> If you do not 'like Fedora' I would suggest that you find some other
> distro of Linux that you do. And leave this list. And? Join the list(s)
> of your latest Lin
On 04/09/2014 01:43 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
> Quoting Tim :
>
>> Allegedly, on or about 08 April 2014, Jonathan Ryshpan sent:
>>> It's an interesting question why Net infrastructure code continues to
>>> be written in C, a language that provides no automatic checks for
>>> buffer overflow, which (
On Apr 19, 2014, at 6:21 AM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
>
> I'm not currently running Fedora, either--it's just not in the mix for
> the five frankenstations and the server that I use for home and business
> right now. But I've been in the field since I got my degree in '76--that's
> almost 40 years now
On 04/10/2014 04:02 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
>
> .
> This bug was pretty bad, but the kind of mistakes that lead to
> overflows and over-reads tend to be from not keeping track of the data
> properly and will cause othe
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:40:40AM -0400, David wrote:
>> My question is/was "And yet you are still 'here'?" Bitching about Fedora?
>>
>> If you do not 'like Fedora' I would suggest that you find some other
>> distro of Linux that you do. And le
On 2014-04-19 06:25, Tim wrote:
Rick Stevens wrote:
Fedora is, by definition, bleeding edge.
Ralf Corsepius:
No, Fedora is not supposed to the bleeding edge. It's supposed to be the
cutting edge, with some occasional warts sometimes.
I would say, by way of what it actually is, it is bleedin
On Apr 19, 2014, at 11:52 AM, Robin Laing wrote:
>
> Fedora will work for servers but the upgrade cycle does cause problems. I
> have seen enough of them in my job.
>
Well, yes. Any linux distribution will work for servers as long as it will run
the binaries required. Even *shudder* Gentoo
Hi All
Ever since I have been on Fedora 20 bonicmgr fails to add any
projects !!
I normally run boincmgr ar root !!
Therefore I am unable to run Seti or any other projects with
bonic-client !!
Does anyone else have this problem!
--
Andrew Gray
Linnet Solutions Ltd
--
users mailing list
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:16:15 -0400
Brahmanand Jogai wrote:
> I am attempting to compile an application (MPB from MIT) with support
> for MPI. It needs fast fourier transform with MPI support. Fedora 20
> provides several versions of fftw, but none has support for either
> openmpi or mpich2.
>
Heinz Diehl wrote:
>> Am I rignt in thinking that fetchmail actually passes the email
>> on to postfix's sendmail-emulator?
>
> Judging from the header fragments you posted, I'm shure that your
> fetchmail connects to your postfix via localhost on port 25. You could
> avoid that step by telling f
I am having a really terrible experience with Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad
420i.
I installed Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad 420i, upgraded it to the latest and
system freezes at the login screen. System temperature goes over limit
either burning the system or shutting it down. Load average goes as high as
On 04/20/14 10:51, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> I am having a really terrible experience with Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad 420i.
>
> I installed Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad 420i, upgraded it to the latest and
> system freezes at the login screen. System temperature goes over limit either
> burning the syst
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 8:46 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/20/14 10:51, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> > I am having a really terrible experience with Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad
> 420i.
> >
> > I installed Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad 420i, upgraded it to the latest
> and system freezes at the login screen.
On 04/20/14 11:26, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> Although I appreciate Dhaval commenting but response sounded like off-topic.
Not so sure that his suggestions where that off topic. But anyway...
>
> If I were to see any process eating CPU would have solved the problem but as
> far as I can see there
On Apr 19, 2014, at 7:51 PM, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> I am having a really terrible experience with Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad 420i.
>
> I installed Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad 420i, upgraded it to the latest and
> system freezes at the login screen. System temperature goes over limit either
> bu
Greetings,
a while ago, I noticed that on my Fedora box digiKam would not load
and display picture galleries anymore, and when launched from the
prompt would produce this message:
digikam(14981)/digikam (core): Reached inotify limit
which IIUC means this is a general problem on that computer, no
As are many things...
Time is the only truly non-renewable resource.
--Russell
Which we seem never to have enough of. :)
Cheers.
Happy chocolate day.
Robin
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On 04/20/14 13:49, M. Fioretti wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> a while ago, I noticed that on my Fedora box digiKam would not load
> and display picture galleries anymore, and when launched from the
> prompt would produce this message:
>
> digikam(14981)/digikam (core): Reached inotify limit
>
> which IIUC
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 14:11:24 PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> I don't know how the system sets this value. 8192 seems rather small to me.
good point, thanks. This, in fact, is a side question that I forgot to
ask in my original email: what are the criteria or rule of thumb to
calculate which val
On 04/20/14 14:09, M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 14:11:24 PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> I don't know how the system sets this value. 8192 seems rather small to me.
> good point, thanks. This, in fact, is a side question that I forgot to
> ask in my original email: what are the criteri
One "silly" question.
What version of Fedora are you running. I found a message on the mailing
lists back in 2010 which, from a reliable source, indicated
> > > kde packagers received a request to consider shipping systems with a
> > > higher (default) value of
> > > /proc/sys/fs
28 matches
Mail list logo
