Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
On Aug 11, 2024, at 11:00 AM, wangzongyi via users
wrote:
CAUTION: The Sender of this email is not from within Dalhousie.
Dear all
I am trying to calculate the band structure of Bi2Se3 in the
1. You are using FD smearing of 0.01Ry. Are you expecting a metallic silicon?
2. Forces on the atoms are large. Are you sure your supercell is generated
correctly?
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
On May 31, 2024, at 4:13 AM, Daniel
, 2024, at 4:07 AM, Kazume NISHIDATE wrote:
CAUTION: The Sender of this email is not from within Dalhousie.
Here is my result (fatband one).
M to K points with 100 divisions.
No spikes.
> 2024/05/25 9:15、Vahid Askarpour のメール:
>
> I do not get spikes in the band structure either (
works. But usually Isn't it for
insulators (fixed occupation)?
Best
Hasan
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 5:21 PM Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>> wrote:
Why not use occupations=‘fixed’?
Cheers,
Vahid
On May 24, 2024, at 5:53 PM, Md. Jahid Hasan Sagor
mailto:md.sa...@maine.edu>>
, Kazume NISHIDATE wrote:
CAUTION: The Sender of this email is not from within Dalhousie.
Dear Vahid Askarpour,
I tried to plot the band using your input files.
I attached the band figure I just calculated along the
path of M to K with 100 k points.
My plot is just a band plot and not the 'fat
along K-G and
M-K. Does anyone know how to eliminate them without manually editing the data?
2. The sum of all the weights are around 1 for most k-points but for some
k-points, it is even up to 1.45. Does anyone know why the weights for some
k-points are so high?
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid
Why not use occupations=‘fixed’?
Cheers,
Vahid
On May 24, 2024, at 5:53 PM, Md. Jahid Hasan Sagor wrote:
CAUTION: The Sender of this email is not from within Dalhousie.
Hi Lorenzo,
Thank you for your response. But Here I am using GaAs, it's a semiconductor,
but still I am getting the message.
Any reason why ATOMIC POSITIONS are specified with crystal_b instead of crystal?
Cheers,
Vahid
On Apr 10, 2024, at 5:47 PM, Gal Cohen wrote:
CAUTION: The Sender of this email is not from within Dalhousie.
Dear QE users i try to run the scf calculation I provide below the program
starts and the
Shouldn’t tprnfor be set to .true. for scf calculations to get the forces?
Cheers,
Vahid
> On Mar 2, 2024, at 4:31 PM, Paolo Giannozzi wrote:
>
> CAUTION: The Sender of this email is not from within Dalhousie.
>
> I guess you should inquire with the developers of PhonoPy, not here.
> Before do
calculation for a 4 4 4 1 1 1 K-grid and specify nosym=.true. in that
file. At the beginning of the output, you will get a list of the 64 k-points in
both crystal and cartesian. The weights are also included. See if this output
agrees with what you know so far.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department
point in the wedge has another equivalent point in the BZ and
that is
64 -0.875 0.875 0.875 0.00 1
The 1 in the last column means that point 64 is equivalent to point 1. Here the
5th column is zero suggesting that this point is not in the wedge.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
gone to 1.0d-22 to
avoid some negative frequencies.
6. Last but not least, the PSP may be the issue.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
On Aug 4, 2023, at 8:00 AM, Vahid Askarpour wrote:
If the coordinates of the atoms are correct for
If the coordinates of the atoms are correct for the bilayer, you just need to
add vacuum by adding 15 to 20 Ang to the c value.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
On Aug 4, 2023, at 7:08 AM, Giuseppe Scala wrote:
CAUTION: The Sender of
Dear QE Community,
Does anyone know the procedure for relaxing an antiferromagnetic structure such
as Mn3Ir? There are some online materials but are mostly scf calculations and
not relaxation. Any suggestions is appreciated.
Thanks,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics,
Dalhousie
Usually, if there is x-ray data on single crystals, the wyckoff positions are
given there. Alternatively, one can use evolutionary algorithms such as USPEX
to generate stable structures but this could be time consuming.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric
ct value is confirmed through the
Abinit code and the D3 code from Grimme’s website.
The change is a factor of 100 which makes C8 off by 10,000. In our case, the D3
dispersion energy changed by a factor of 3 because of this error.
Regards,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atm
Thanks Paolo. I should have made my search case sensitive.
Best,
Vahid
On Jun 20, 2022, at 9:26 AM, Paolo Giannozzi
mailto:paolo.gianno...@uniud.it>> wrote:
grep -i set_criteria *f90
___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people a
8.4)')tau_max(1),tau_max(2),tau_max(3)
end subroutine SET_CRITERIA
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
___
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21759) by Grimme et al. except that the
s6 and s8 (s18 in the code) are missing. Actually s6 is set to 1.0 for version
4 but what about s8? Shouldn’t c8 change to s8*c8 in the above second equation?
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric
Congratulations for passing Paolo’s test of the functionality of the mailing
list.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
On Apr 28, 2022, at 6:50 AM, remya ud
mailto:remyau...@gmail.com>> wrote:
CAUTION: The
the current method to determine U.
HTH
Iurii
--
Dr. Iurii TIMROV
Senior Research Scientist
Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
+41 21 69 34 881
http://people.epfl.ch/265334
____
Hi Iurii and Iman,
I tried your second test (the first test failed) using find_atpert=1 and
docc_thr=1.D-15 in my input and the hp.x code perturbed all atoms and the
reconstruction error was avoided. I am getting large U parameters (~60 and
20eV) for the two species and am trying to figure out
and the second
by 25.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
On Jan 24, 2022, at 1:25 PM, Aleksandra Oranskaia
mailto:aleksandra.oransk...@kaust.edu.sa>>
wrote:
CAUTION: The Sender of this email is not from
into the code to see if I can find the source of this crash.
Cheers,
Vahid
On Jan 12, 2022, at 8:31 AM, Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>> wrote:
Dear Iurii,
Thank you for taking the time to look at my files. Yes, I did recompile hp.x
first and then pw.x for QE-6.5. I did not reali
--
Dr. Iurii TIMROV
Senior Research Scientist
Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
+41 21 69 34 881
http://people.epfl.ch/265334
From: Vahid Askarpour mailto:vh261...@dal.ca&
ry and Simulation of Materials (THEOS)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
+41 21 69 34 881
http://people.epfl.ch/265334
From: users
mailto:users-boun...@lists.quantum-espresso.org>>
on behalf of Vahid Askarpour
this error is deeply appreciated.
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum
ion of Materials (THEOS)
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
+41 21 69 34 881
http://people.epfl.ch/265334
From: users
mailto:users-boun...@lists.quantum-espresso.org>>
on behalf of Vahid Askarpour mailto:vh261...
In case anyone might be trying this, I ended up creating two self-consistent
folders and ran step1.in in one and step2.in in the other.
Cheers,
Vahid
> On Nov 20, 2021, at 7:07 PM, Vahid Askarpour wrote:
>
> Dear QE community,
>
> In the HP/examples/example07, the scf.in, ste
ep1.in and step2.in at the same time in the outdir or in
separate folders, only one HP subfolder is create in the outdir where step1 and
step2 jobs both write to this HP subfolder. How do I create different HP
subfolders for step1.in and step2.in?
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of p
I see. Thanks Paolo for this clarification.
Cheers,
Vahid
On Sep 16, 2021, at 4:55 AM, Paolo Giannozzi
mailto:p.gianno...@gmail.com>> wrote:
CAUTION: The Sender of this email is not from within Dalhousie.
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 12:13 AM Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca&g
Dear QE Community,
In line 127 of rigid.f90 in the Phonon package of QE-6.8, we see
IF (loto_2d) THEN
But in the online manual for ph.x 6.8, loto_2d is not described. Is this
omission intentional? Is 2D splitting of LO-TO officially supported in the ph.x
6.8?
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid
The EPW forum kindly clarified that the issue is not with EPW but likely the
PHonon code.
Cheers,
Vahid
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/m
If you refer to the sharp change in slope around K, you need to make a jump
from K to U. These two points are equivalent. Attached please see one that I
did a while back.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
On
Dear QE Community,
On the QE Github page, it states that for QE-6.8
* electron-phonon calculation in the non-colinear/spinorbit case is broken
Does this refer to electron-phonon calculation with the PHonon code or with the
EPW code?
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics
Hi Konda,
I have had the same issue with the latest QE. I found that by running QE (under
slurm) with the following command always avoids the cholesky issue:
srun pw.x -npools $SLURM_NTASKS < relax.in > relax.out
Don’t ask why because I do not know.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Depa
BZ segments.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
> On Jul 14, 2021, at 12:00 PM, Thomas Brumme wrote:
>
> CAUTION: The Sender of this email is not from within Dalhousie.
>
> Did anyone try recentl
17:28, "Vahid Askarpour" mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>>:
The coordinates of the high-symmetry points in matdyn.in should be in cartesian
not crystal because you are specifying q_in_band_form=.true.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie Univers
The coordinates of the high-symmetry points in matdyn.in should be in cartesian
not crystal because you are specifying q_in_band_form=.true.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
On Mar 30, 2021, at 11:19 AM, Evgenii
In the matdyn.in file, the coordinates of the high-symmetry points should be in
cartesian not crystal coordinates since you are using q_in_band_form=.true.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
On Jan 22, 2021, at 12
The atomic positions are specified in alat units for vc-relax. They appear to
be in crystal coordinates.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
On Nov 17, 2020, at 5:19 AM, Varrick Suezaki
mailto:vsuez...@ucr.edu>>
calculation, I suggest the
tetrahedron method. These are explained in the QE manual.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
On Oct 13, 2020, at 4:49 PM, Poonam Kaushik
mailto:poonamkaushi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
CAUTION: The Sen
It should be filband not filbands.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
On Sep 28, 2020, at 1:29 PM, Menna Hasan
mailto:menna.ha...@aucegypt.edu>> wrote:
CAUTION: The Sender of this email is not from within Dal
cutoff of 240Ry.
Cheers,
Vahid
> On Sep 14, 2020, at 8:56 AM, Vahid Askarpour wrote:
>
> Dear QE Community,
>
> I am attempting to generate a hard PSP for copper (to calculate the
> electrical conductivity of pure copper) by including the semi-core states as
> done in the at
aking the 3P and 3D energies agree beyond what I have
already tried?
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espre
-0.00 -5.4895490000 -5.489549
This seems to be a primitive cell.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
Canada
On Jul 17, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Lorenzo Paulatto
mailto:paul...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I use the code FINDSYM (https://stokes.byu.edu/iso/findsym.php) which takes a
cif file (of conventional or primitive cells) and output the primitive cell
parameters. Can be used online or downloaded.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie
The pressure is too large, which is why it is printed as stars.
You are only relaxing the atoms not the lattice constants. Is there a reason
why you are not using vc-relax?
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
Canada
>
1 10.604083 10.00 0 0 0
W 9.305080 10.604083 10.00 0 0 0
C 7.223291 2.628097 19.75
H 6.590292 1.997000 20.383000
H 7.856291 1.997000 19.117000
H 6.590292 3.263000 19.117000
H 7.856291 3.263000 20.383000
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 19:51
Specify nbnd for bands.
For broadening, check the input parameters occupations, smearing, degauss.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
Canada
On Jun 17, 2020, at 8:44 PM, Coralie Khabbaz
mailto:khabbaz.cora...@gmail.com
Dear QE Users,
Is it possible to output the core electron energy with QE? I am hoping to use
the core energy as a reference for electronic band shifts as a result of atomic
displacement.
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
band you could try to compute them with wannier90 for
example.
regards Pietro
On 15/04/20 15:05, Vahid Askarpour wrote:
Hi Pietro,
If I understand your argument correctly, then the same can be said of the 2
electrons of s-Pb localized just above 0eV. These 2 electrons are mainly
centered
, but the orbital will now lean towards the closer Pb and away from
those that are now a little bit farther, this enhances the dynamical charge
with respect to the oxidation number.
Pietro
On 14/04/20 00:54, Vahid Askarpour wrote:
The attached projected DOS for PbS suggests that the Pb s-
, Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>> wrote:
Dear Stefano,
Thank you for this quick response. I was following Xavier Gonze’s argument in
PRB58, 6224 (1998) Eq. 20 where
Z*(u)=dp/du, where p is the dipole moment and u is the displacement. Since
p=u.Z(u), we get
Z*(u)=Z(u)+udZ(u)/du,
follow it, even if they can still belong its Bader volume.
>
> it looks a bit extreme but this appears to be the result. You could
> compute the atomic projected density of states and see if this seems the
> case.
>
> stefano
>
> On 13/04/20 17:11, Vahid Askarpour wrote:
>&g
quite different
from the those of the PHONON code (-9.878 and -10.168). I am assuming that the
code is correct and my logic is flawed. I would appreciate any thoughts you may
have on this discrepancy.
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie
. When we set
geninterp=.true.
geninterp_alsofirstder=.true.
The postw90 output includes k-point coordinates (with units), energies (with
units) and velocities (no units). Am I correct in assuming that these
velocities are in eV*angstrom/(2pi)?
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of
May be you are using an older version of QE in which cell_dofree=‘ibrav’ was
not implemented?
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of physics and atmospheric science
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
Canada
On Mar 15, 2020, at 6:06 AM, Fariba Islam
mailto:ezq...@gmail.com>> wrote:
C
k-grid?
Best regards,
Dominik
Gesendet: Samstag, 26. Oktober 2019 um 23:33 Uhr
Von: "Vahid Askarpour" mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>>
An: "Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum"
mailto:users@lists.quantum-espresso.org>>
Betreff: Re: [QE-users] Band structure with hybrid function
Oct 26, 2019, at 6:34 PM, Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>> wrote:
I have calculated HSE band structure using the method you described. The only
difference is that for the band-structure k-points, I used a weight of 0.01
instead of zero.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Departm
I have calculated HSE band structure using the method you described. The only
difference is that for the band-structure k-points, I used a weight of 0.01
instead of zero.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
Why not google it? I did and here is a link:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/zaac.19683610110
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
On Apr 13, 2019, at 4:11 PM, Mahsa Soltani
mailto:mahsasolta
first structure converges in say 25 steps but the other structures
go through 0 bfgs steps. They remain unconverged even though for each of them
nstep should be 50.
Vahid
> On Dec 13, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Vahid Askarpour wrote:
>
> This is likely a bug in the thermo_pw code. When I u
This is likely a bug in the thermo_pw code. When I use “lmurn=.TRUE.”, the
error disappears.
However, I need to use “lmurn=.FALSE.” in order to change all the orthorhombic
lattice constants and not just celldm(1).
Vahid
> On Dec 13, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Vahid Askarpour wrote:
>
>
0.75000 0.023572533
K_POINTS AUTOMATIC
2 2 2 0 0 0
And for phonon calculation:
SnSe-Pnma
&inputph
tr2_ph=1.0d-9,
prefix='tinsel',
fildyn='SnSe.dyn.xml',
ldisp=.TRUE.
epsil=.TRUE.
nq1=2, nq2=2, nq3=2,
/
If you have encountered this error (or possible bug
00 Ry, 0.00 Ha, 0.00 eV
Ecxc =-145.329988 Ry, -72.664994 Ha, -1977.315048 eV
(Ecc =-145.329988 Ry, -72.664994 Ha, -1977.315048 eV)
Does anyone have any suggestions for what I might be missing from the above
procedure?
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid A
Looking at the plotband.f90 code, jumps are allowed:
IF (dxmod > 5*dxmod_save) THEN
!
! A big jump in dxmod is a sign that the point k(:,n) and k(:,n-1)
! are quite distant and belong to two different lines. We put them on
! the same point in the graph
!
kx(n)=kx(n-1)
Cheers,
structure?
Thanks,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
1. You could use the ibrav=0 results. In the matdyn.in, do not use
gG 50
X 50
M 50
gG 8
Instead, explicitly give the coordinates of each high-symmetry point in
cartesian.
2. Four days sounds like a long time unless you are running on few nodes. If a
run takes several days, you can break it
ote:
>
>
> Thank you Vahid Askarpour.
>
> I have two questions:
>
> a) Is there a problem if I don't specify amass?
>
> b) I have already done this procedure using the following files:
>
> ph.x:
>
> &inputph
> prefix = 'Si',
>
is in the
.gp output file.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
> On Feb 19, 2018, at 4:54 AM, elch...@auth.gr wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am using ph.x to get the phonon frequencies and dynamic
problem.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
> On Jan 28, 2018, at 2:50 PM, Anik Mondol wrote:
>
>
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://
You can download rel-pz.0.3.1.tgz from the following website:
http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Pseudopotentials
The file includes norm-conserving LDA full-relativistic pseudopotentials. Also
available are the PBE counterparts.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric
Hi,
Shouldn’t this be uniqueb instead of unique_b?
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
On Jan 25, 2018, at 3:17 PM, José C. Conesa
mailto:jccon...@icp.csic.es>> wrote:
Hi,
This did not work. By inc
The FINDSYM code (http://stokes.byu.edu/iso/findsym.php) takes as input a
primitive or conventional cell and returns the primitive cell along with the
Wyckoff positions, space group and primitive lattice vectors/constants.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric
.025 0.000 0
0.067 -0.033 0.000 0
…..
…..
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
On Dec 25, 2017, at 3:40 AM, pachineela rambabu
mailto:rams@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear Forum,
fully relativistic PS for many elements. But unfortunately It
doesn't have any thing for W.
Best
Eliya
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>> wrote:
The website http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Pseudopotentials has untested NC
fully relativistic PSP fo
The website http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Pseudopotentials has untested NC
fully relativistic PSP for both PBE and PZ (LDA). They are in the files
rel-pbe.0.3.1.tgz and rel-pz.0.3.1.tgz.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax
definition of Emin, Emax and DeltaE, see the online dos.x manual.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
On Nov 6, 2017, at 4:19 PM, B S Bhushan
mailto:ecebhus...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear Experts,
I am tryi
d the atoms seem
to be not folded back. Can someone confirm me that?
Best Regards,
Nam Tran
From: pw_forum-boun...@pwscf.org<mailto:pw_forum-boun...@pwscf.org>
mailto:pw_forum-boun...@pwscf.org>> on behalf of
Vahid Askarpour mailto:vh261...@dal.c
There is a collection of fortran codes (for VASP mainly but can easily be
adapted) for processing simulation output including MSD calculation and the
treatment of periodic images. They can be found at https://github.com/boates
under the Physics repository (see msd.f90).
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid
ed the initial cell and atomic parameters from bulk.
GAUTAM GADDEMANE
DEPARTMENT OF MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>> wrote:
Hi Gautam,
The following relaxation input worked for me:
BP
_psl.0.1.UPF
K_POINTS {automatic}
14 12 1 0 0 0
CELL_PARAMETERS (angstrom)
4.429539231 0.0 0.0
0.0 3.279402120 0.0
0.0 0.0 31.941846246
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
P0.001152971 0.0 0.015264978
P0.335395
mkl/11.3.4.258.
Is this not the correct way to build QE with Wannier90 in the library mode?
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pws
code that needs to change in order to get it to
work on the above machine?
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
wrote:
because somewhere in phq_readin
trans = trans .OR. ldisp
lrpa is only valid for the calculation of the macroscopic dielectric
constant, not for the vibrational parts.
stefano
On 30/06/2017 01:06, Vahid Askarpour wrote:
Dear QE Users,
After a self consistent calculation, I used the fol
ror was reported to the Forum.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
modulus of e1=0.333 in alat units. That’s why
the x-axis runs from 0 to ~0.33. However, the origin of the plot is (0,0,0) and
not x0.
Thank you,
Vahid
On Jun 20, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>> wrote:
Just a correction to my pp.x input file:
I actually used car
s. Two possibilities:
1. The distance is in Bohr. So is the pp.x code plotting from 0 to 0.33 Bohr
even though the bond length is 5.16Bohr as defined by the vectors x0 and e1?
2. The distance is in alat. Then 0.33*alat=7.04Bohr. This is longer than the
bond length.
So what is the unit of the x-axi
length.
So what is the unit of the x-axis?
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
SnSe_potential.pdf
Description: SnSe_potential.pdf
___
Pw_forum mailing list
this limitation. I will give it a try.
Best wishes,
Vahid
> On Mar 16, 2017, at 5:14 AM, Lorenzo Paulatto
> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 11:11:54 PM CET Vahid Askarpour wrote:
>> I would like to calculate the overlap integral u*_k’(r)u_k(r)d^3r.
>
> Dear Va
ost (http://qe-forge.org/pipermail/pw_forum/2015-April/106663.html)
suggests a similar concept for but not for .
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
___
Pw_forum mail
?
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
yboard... Contact info:
http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Contact
On 13 Jan 2017, at 15:35, Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>> wrote:
Dear QE Community,
I have compiled qe-6.0 with intel-14 and openmpi-1.6.5. In attempting to speed
up the phonon calculation (as suggested in other posts), I ha
cf = 'dvscf'
/
===
I would appreciate any input as to why alpha_mix alters the results for polar
materials such as GaAs and SnSe.
Thank you,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, Canada
___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
as nks nks_tot provided by QE environment?
Could you print the nbase for each processor and see if they are the numbers
expected?
Ye
===
Ye Luo, Ph.D.
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
2016-10-30 18:59 GMT-05:00 Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>>
ug of the variable msglen.
Ye
===
Ye Luo, Ph.D.
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
2016-10-30 14:25 GMT-05:00 Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>>:
Hi Ye,
The changes I am making are part of the EPW/QE code and so the parallelization
depends on the
y make sure they are correct.
Ye
===
Ye Luo, Ph.D.
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
2016-10-28 14:33 GMT-05:00 Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>>:
Hi Ye,
Thank you for your suggestion. I tried it and when I ran the code, it
seg-faulted. I
ool_id+k_pool))=input(1:3,1:nbnds,1:k_pool)
Ye
===
Ye Luo, Ph.D.
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
2016-10-28 12:29 GMT-05:00 Vahid Askarpour
mailto:vh261...@dal.ca>>:
Dear QE Users,
I am working on some modifications to the QE-6.0 code using symmetry.
parallel, the output file is different from
the serial run.
Does the QE's mp_sum allow the above operation for a three-D array?
Any hints or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science
Dalhousie University,
Halifax, NS, C
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo