On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 00:40 +0200, GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am using SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
> Postfix, amavis, clamd, *nix
>
>
> My question:
> All emails from localhost are tagged als ***Spam*** in the subject
> line.
>
> How can I avoid this ?
> Please help
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:40:08PM -0700, Jake Maul wrote:
> I get spam like this too. I'd tell you to train your bayes db better,
> but no amount of learning these things seems to have any effect for
> me- the next one in just just right back at BAYES_50. Mine are also
> largely from Yahoo, some f
Munroe Sollog wrote:
> I'm not quite sure I understand what is happening here:
>
> http://www.pastebin.ca/1184943
>
> it looks like the message is triggering rules but in the end it is
> getting '0' points
Can you run the message through 'spamassassin -t -D' to get a full
summary report? (See '
I get spam like this too. I'd tell you to train your bayes db better,
but no amount of learning these things seems to have any effect for
me- the next one in just just right back at BAYES_50. Mine are also
largely from Yahoo, some from Hotmail.
One thing that bothers me is how painfully obvious th
I'm having an increased amount of junk getting through due to it coming
from Hotmail and Yahoo's servers which makes any type of pre-filter
stuff like RBL's, Greylisting, Sender Verification useless which leaves
me to rely on Spamassassin. I cannot block hotmail and Yahoo (although
I would lik
I'm not quite sure I understand what is happening here:
http://www.pastebin.ca/1184943
it looks like the message is triggering rules but in the end it is
getting '0' points
--
Munroe Sollog
Systems Engineer
Digirati Consulting, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/25/08, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Since you're using amavis, you'd have to ask those folks.
> SA will scan anything given to it, so ...
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 01:05:39AM +0200, GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote:
> > >Easy solution: Don't pass mail from localhost to spamassassin.
> >
> > Hello E
Since you're using amavis, you'd have to ask those folks.
SA will scan anything given to it, so ...
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 01:05:39AM +0200, GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote:
> >Easy solution: Don't pass mail from localhost to spamassassin.
>
> Hello Evan,
>
> how can I do that?
>
> (I am newbie)
Hello List,
Spamassassin is working fine.
But ...
Mails from local emailacount to other local email accounts
are tagged as spam
(Header-Merssage:Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]))
I am using SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
Postfix, amavis, clamd, *nix
What I have to configure?
Reaga
My question:
All emails from localhost are tagged als ***Spam*** in the subject
line.
since localhost is unknown, you might want to add it to your /etc/hosts
Hello Dan,thanx, just did that ...Spmafilter is working fine.Just the Mails
from server to server over web are tagged as spamWhat can I do
Easy solution: Don't pass mail from localhost to spamassassin.
Hello Evan,
how can I do that?
(I am newbie)
GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote:
Hello List,
I am using SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
Postfix, amavis, clamd, *nix
My question:
All emails from localhost are tagged als ***Spam*** in the subject line.
How can I avoid this ?
Please help me.
(Header-Merssage:Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 00:40 +0200, GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I am using SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
> Postfix, amavis, clamd, *nix
>
>
> My question:
> All emails from localhost are tagged als ***Spam*** in the subject
> line.
>
> How can I avoid this ?
> Please help
Hello List,
I am using SpamAssassin version 3.2.5
Postfix, amavis, clamd, *nix
My question:
All emails from localhost are tagged als ***Spam*** in the subject line.
How can I avoid this ?
Please help me.
(Header-Merssage:Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]))
Regards,
Oliver
At 12:13 25-08-2008, Hachmann wrote:
Thank you for your reply. This seems to be exactly what I want.
Unfortuneatly I am running 3.0.4 and this only works from 3.1 on.
I am not that familiar with upgrading SA. Is there an easy and safe way?
I yet downloaded 3.2.4 and run perl Makefiel.PL without
Hello all,
I searched high and low but could not find anywhere that says the
following rule patten is invalid or not allowed in SpamAssassin 3.2.5 on
CentOS 5.1 However it works with non-zero numbers... Thoughts? and TIA
header LOCAL_TESTHEADERTESTHEADER =~ /^0$/
score
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 09:13:16PM +0200, Hachmann wrote:
> SM schrieb:
> >Hi Alexander,
> >At 06:35 25-08-2008, Alexander Hachmann wrote:
> >>I am currently having the problem with a lot of mails returning from
> >>daemons in response
> >>to mails I did now write.
> >>Does anyone have a .cf solut
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Jean-Paul Natola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm launching a free spam reduction service to help build up my
> blacklists. It involves adding a fake high numbered MX record to your
> existing MX list that points to one of our servers. We always r
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm launching a free spam reduction service to help build up my
blacklists. It involves adding a fake high numbered MX record to your
existing MX list that points to one of our servers. We always return a
451 error but we have a very good way of detectin
Hi everyone,
I'm launching a free spam reduction service to help build up my
blacklists. It involves adding a fake high numbered MX record to your
existing MX list that points to one of our servers. We always return a
451 error but we have a very good way of detecting virus infected spam
bots
SM schrieb:
Hi Alexander,
At 06:35 25-08-2008, Alexander Hachmann wrote:
I am currently having the problem with a lot of mails returning from
daemons in response
to mails I did now write.
Does anyone have a .cf solution for this issue. I am getting more
than a hundred per week of these f.n
Subject: George Bush caught naked with Paris Hilton! Sinsatsionnye photos!
...eww. Not many of *these* will be opened.
:)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4
Hi Alexander,
At 06:35 25-08-2008, Alexander Hachmann wrote:
I am currently having the problem with a lot of mails returning from
daemons in response
to mails I did now write.
Does anyone have a .cf solution for this issue. I am getting more
than a hundred per week of these f.ng Mails.
Ha
Hi everyone,
I'm launching a free spam reduction service to help build up my
blacklists. It involves adding a fake high numbered MX record to your
existing MX list that points to one of our servers. We always return a
451 error but we have a very good way of detecting virus infected spam
bots
Mark,
Thanks!
My problem was acces denied in /etc/mail to amavis user.
Greetings...
--
[]'s
Thiago Henrique
Network Administration
Digirati Networks
K8 Networks
On Sex, 2008-08-22 at 18:23 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Thiago,
>
> > Running "spamassassin - lint -D" the .pre files are read:
Alexander Hachmann wrote:
Hi,
I am currently having the problem with a lot of mails returning from
daemons in response
to mails I did now write.
Is this "now" or "not"? if it is "now", then stop writing :)
oh, and stop sending "duplicate" mail. one post is enough.
Does anyone have a .cf sol
Hi,
I am currently having the problem with a lot of mails returning from
daemons in response
to mails I did now write.
Does anyone have a .cf solution for this issue. I am getting more than a
hundred per week of these f.ng Mails.
I allready tried to write my own test. But I cannot figure
Hi,
I am currently having the problem with a lot of mails returning from
daemons in response
to mails I did now write.
Does anyone have a .cf solution for this issue. I am getting more than a
hundred per week of these f.ng Mails.
I allready tried to write my own test. But I cannot figure
28 matches
Mail list logo