Re: How to avoid localhost mails tagged as spam

2008-08-25 Thread ram
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 00:40 +0200, GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote: > Hello List, > > I am using SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 > Postfix, amavis, clamd, *nix > > > My question: > All emails from localhost are tagged als ***Spam*** in the subject > line. > > How can I avoid this ? > Please help

Re: Help with Junk from Hotmail and Yahoo's Servers

2008-08-25 Thread Henrik K
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:40:08PM -0700, Jake Maul wrote: > I get spam like this too. I'd tell you to train your bayes db better, > but no amount of learning these things seems to have any effect for > me- the next one in just just right back at BAYES_50. Mine are also > largely from Yahoo, some f

Re: Triggering rules but not scoring

2008-08-25 Thread Bob Proulx
Munroe Sollog wrote: > I'm not quite sure I understand what is happening here: > > http://www.pastebin.ca/1184943 > > it looks like the message is triggering rules but in the end it is > getting '0' points Can you run the message through 'spamassassin -t -D' to get a full summary report? (See '

Re: Help with Junk from Hotmail and Yahoo's Servers

2008-08-25 Thread Jake Maul
I get spam like this too. I'd tell you to train your bayes db better, but no amount of learning these things seems to have any effect for me- the next one in just just right back at BAYES_50. Mine are also largely from Yahoo, some from Hotmail. One thing that bothers me is how painfully obvious th

Help with Junk from Hotmail and Yahoo's Servers

2008-08-25 Thread James Robertson
I'm having an increased amount of junk getting through due to it coming from Hotmail and Yahoo's servers which makes any type of pre-filter stuff like RBL's, Greylisting, Sender Verification useless which leaves me to rely on Spamassassin. I cannot block hotmail and Yahoo (although I would lik

Triggering rules but not scoring

2008-08-25 Thread Munroe Sollog
I'm not quite sure I understand what is happening here: http://www.pastebin.ca/1184943 it looks like the message is triggering rules but in the end it is getting '0' points -- Munroe Sollog Systems Engineer Digirati Consulting, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How to avoid localhost mails tagged as spam

2008-08-25 Thread Gary V
On 8/25/08, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > Since you're using amavis, you'd have to ask those folks. > SA will scan anything given to it, so ... > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 01:05:39AM +0200, GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote: > > >Easy solution: Don't pass mail from localhost to spamassassin. > > > > Hello E

Re: How to avoid localhost mails tagged as spam

2008-08-25 Thread Theo Van Dinter
Since you're using amavis, you'd have to ask those folks. SA will scan anything given to it, so ... On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 01:05:39AM +0200, GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote: > >Easy solution: Don't pass mail from localhost to spamassassin. > > Hello Evan, > > how can I do that? > > (I am newbie)

local emails are tagged as spam

2008-08-25 Thread GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale
Hello List, Spamassassin is working fine. But ... Mails from local emailacount to other local email accounts are tagged as spam (Header-Merssage:Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])) I am using SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 Postfix, amavis, clamd, *nix What I have to configure? Reaga

Re: How to avoid localhost mails tagged as spam

2008-08-25 Thread GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale
My question: All emails from localhost are tagged als ***Spam*** in the subject line. since localhost is unknown, you might want to add it to your /etc/hosts Hello Dan,thanx, just did that ...Spmafilter is working fine.Just the Mails from server to server over web are tagged as spamWhat can I do

Re: How to avoid localhost mails tagged as spam

2008-08-25 Thread GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale
Easy solution: Don't pass mail from localhost to spamassassin. Hello Evan, how can I do that? (I am newbie)

Re: How to avoid localhost mails tagged as spam

2008-08-25 Thread Evan Platt
GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote: Hello List, I am using SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 Postfix, amavis, clamd, *nix My question: All emails from localhost are tagged als ***Spam*** in the subject line. How can I avoid this ? Please help me. (Header-Merssage:Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]

Re: How to avoid localhost mails tagged as spam

2008-08-25 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 00:40 +0200, GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale wrote: > Hello List, > > I am using SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 > Postfix, amavis, clamd, *nix > > > My question: > All emails from localhost are tagged als ***Spam*** in the subject > line. > > How can I avoid this ? > Please help

How to avoid localhost mails tagged as spam

2008-08-25 Thread GoodnGo.de (R) Zentrale
Hello List, I am using SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 Postfix, amavis, clamd, *nix My question: All emails from localhost are tagged als ***Spam*** in the subject line. How can I avoid this ? Please help me. (Header-Merssage:Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])) Regards, Oliver

Re: Mailer DAEMON Returns && Body Check on Multipart

2008-08-25 Thread SM
At 12:13 25-08-2008, Hachmann wrote: Thank you for your reply. This seems to be exactly what I want. Unfortuneatly I am running 3.0.4 and this only works from 3.1 on. I am not that familiar with upgrading SA. Is there an easy and safe way? I yet downloaded 3.2.4 and run perl Makefiel.PL without

custom rule with pattern test of 0 (zero) not processed

2008-08-25 Thread dms dms
Hello all, I searched high and low but could not find anywhere that says the following rule patten is invalid or not allowed in SpamAssassin 3.2.5 on CentOS 5.1 However it works with non-zero numbers... Thoughts? and TIA header LOCAL_TESTHEADERTESTHEADER =~ /^0$/ score

Re: Mailer DAEMON Returns && Body Check on Multipart

2008-08-25 Thread Bob McClure Jr
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 09:13:16PM +0200, Hachmann wrote: > SM schrieb: > >Hi Alexander, > >At 06:35 25-08-2008, Alexander Hachmann wrote: > >>I am currently having the problem with a lot of mails returning from > >>daemons in response > >>to mails I did now write. > >>Does anyone have a .cf solut

Re: Blacklist Mining Project - Project Tarbaby

2008-08-25 Thread Aaron Wolfe
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Jean-Paul Natola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I'm launching a free spam reduction service to help build up my > blacklists. It involves adding a fake high numbered MX record to your > existing MX list that points to one of our servers. We always r

Re: Blacklist Mining Project - Project Tarbaby

2008-08-25 Thread Marc Perkel
Jean-Paul Natola wrote: Hi everyone, I'm launching a free spam reduction service to help build up my blacklists. It involves adding a fake high numbered MX record to your existing MX list that points to one of our servers. We always return a 451 error but we have a very good way of detectin

RE: Blacklist Mining Project - Project Tarbaby

2008-08-25 Thread Jean-Paul Natola
Hi everyone, I'm launching a free spam reduction service to help build up my blacklists. It involves adding a fake high numbered MX record to your existing MX list that points to one of our servers. We always return a 451 error but we have a very good way of detecting virus infected spam bots

Re: Mailer DAEMON Returns && Body Check on Multipart

2008-08-25 Thread Hachmann
SM schrieb: Hi Alexander, At 06:35 25-08-2008, Alexander Hachmann wrote: I am currently having the problem with a lot of mails returning from daemons in response to mails I did now write. Does anyone have a .cf solution for this issue. I am getting more than a hundred per week of these f.n

OT: Latest email worm subject shows poor grasp of "social engineering"

2008-08-25 Thread John Hardin
Subject: George Bush caught naked with Paris Hilton! Sinsatsionnye photos! ...eww. Not many of *these* will be opened. :) -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4

Re: Mailer DAEMON Returns && Body Check on Multipart

2008-08-25 Thread SM
Hi Alexander, At 06:35 25-08-2008, Alexander Hachmann wrote: I am currently having the problem with a lot of mails returning from daemons in response to mails I did now write. Does anyone have a .cf solution for this issue. I am getting more than a hundred per week of these f.ng Mails. Ha

Blacklist Mining Project - Project Tarbaby

2008-08-25 Thread Marc Perkel
Hi everyone, I'm launching a free spam reduction service to help build up my blacklists. It involves adding a fake high numbered MX record to your existing MX list that points to one of our servers. We always return a 451 error but we have a very good way of detecting virus infected spam bots

Re: check: no loaded plugin implements 'check_main': cannot scan!

2008-08-25 Thread Thiago Henrique
Mark, Thanks! My problem was acces denied in /etc/mail to amavis user. Greetings... -- []'s Thiago Henrique Network Administration Digirati Networks K8 Networks On Sex, 2008-08-22 at 18:23 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote: > Thiago, > > > Running "spamassassin - lint -D" the .pre files are read:

Re: Mailer DAEMON Returns && Body Check on Multipart

2008-08-25 Thread mouss
Alexander Hachmann wrote: Hi, I am currently having the problem with a lot of mails returning from daemons in response to mails I did now write. Is this "now" or "not"? if it is "now", then stop writing :) oh, and stop sending "duplicate" mail. one post is enough. Does anyone have a .cf sol

Mailer DAEMON Returns && Body Check on Multipart

2008-08-25 Thread Alexander Hachmann
Hi, I am currently having the problem with a lot of mails returning from daemons in response to mails I did now write. Does anyone have a .cf solution for this issue. I am getting more than a hundred per week of these f.ng Mails. I allready tried to write my own test. But I cannot figure

Mailer DAEMON Returns && Body Check on Multipart

2008-08-25 Thread Alexander Hachmann
Hi, I am currently having the problem with a lot of mails returning from daemons in response to mails I did now write. Does anyone have a .cf solution for this issue. I am getting more than a hundred per week of these f.ng Mails. I allready tried to write my own test. But I cannot figure