Hi Bob
I think you are right about factors out side the nucleus being of great
importance.
I was wondering if the data from these transmutations and isotopic shifts could
tell us something independent of any theory about the nucleus. For example if
the observed data requires particular states
Thanks very much Eric for the pointers to the other papers and for the link to
your interesting paper too.
I have a lot to catch up with it seems.
I was wondering if the transmutations and isotopic evolutions could turn out to
require certain states such as excitation or parity spin states or s
Your largely of course about Norman Cook having his own views about how to
present the Nucleus, but I found the initial part of his book where he
describes the relationship between various states and nucleus stability which
is data based and independent of his ideas quite interesting.
By bottom
Actually what you describe has already happened. Norman Cook himself is
weighing in on a theory of LENR. However, I don't think it is that
simple. Dr. Cook is well versed at what happens inside the nucleus, but
the LENR phenomenon is bigger than that - it needs a condensed matter
physicist also
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Stephen Cooke
wrote:
This [using Norman Cook's theory as a guide] would be a bottom up approach
> from first principles which might the match well with one or more of the
> more usual top down theories ideas.
>
This sounds like a top-down approach, starting from
Eric I agree with what you said here completely.
I think it could be well worth some one with an un biased mind looking through
these transmutations and isotope evolutions to see what information it throws
up.
I guess for most of us find it very difficult to do though as I think we all
have ou
>From what I've seen, there's transmutations all over the map. This is an
area that is in need of systematization in the hands of someone careful who
does not have a pet theory to advance, or who can do a rigorous job despite
having a pet theory. This is the kind of topic for which it would be ea
Thanks Jones Beene. I read Storms book about a year or so ago when I was still
new to LENR.
I should definitely take a look again now I have learnt a bit about the history
and the developments from elsewhere too. Probably I could learn a lot more from
reading it again now.
Thanks for pointing
Yes, no, yes. This would be according to Storms' book, which devotes about
12 pages to transmutation. His coverage may not be completely correct but is
there anything better?
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Cooke
I have a couple of questions that maybe some here can answer.
In the LENR
I have a couple of questions that maybe some here can answer.
In the LENR context:
Are transmutations of elements and isotope evolutions for elements lighter and
including Ni ever observed for heavier isotopes (I.e neutron rich isotopes)? Or
only for those isotopes with fewer neutrons than idea
10 matches
Mail list logo