Hello Mattia,
Ofcourse, you are right. I made a mistake.
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Mattia Rizzi
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Problems with energy calculation Rossi device
Absolutely not. It's a flow.
read the report. It's a simple calculation!
From: P.J van Noorden
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 5:41 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Problems with energy calculation Rossi device
Ofcourse. degr/sec is a typo.
But do you agree that if the temperature rise of a waterflow of
, 2011 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Problems with energy calculation Rossi device
>I agree with you that when 300W is used the temperature rise will be: 300W /
1.8 x 4.2 J/gr degrC = 40 degr/ sec.
It's not 40 degr/sec.
It's 40 degress.
1.8cc = 1.8 g.
Flow is 1.8 g/s
1.8 g/s
April 09, 2011 4:36 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Problems with energy calculation Rossi device
Hello Mattia,
When using a flow of 6.47 l/hour = 1.8 cc/ sec, and a temperature rise of
30degrC in 180 seconds (from the curve in the article = is 0.15 degr C/sec) the
thermal pow
eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Problems with energy calculation Rossi device
>When 4kW is added to such a waterflow the temperature would rise
instantaneously to 100 degr C.
You are confusing between static and dynamic condition.
It's physic
when
dynamic is over.
From: P.J van Noorden
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:19 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Problems with energy calculation Rossi device
Hello
In figure 6 of the article
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kulland
In reply to P.J van Noorden's message of Thu, 7 Apr 2011 11:19:06 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Hello
>
>In figure 6 of the article
>http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29
>
>
>it is stated that the waterflow is 6.47 l/ hour= abo
Hello
In figure 6 of the article
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3144960.ece/BINARY/Download+the+report+by+Kullander+and+Ess%C3%A9n+%28pdf%29
it is stated that the waterflow is 6.47 l/ hour= about 2 ml/sec. This is about
the waterflow of a espressomachine.
When 4kW is added to such a
8 matches
Mail list logo