I think I found them back on the 1.5 branch, but the trunk based links
to the Examples folder given in the tutorial are no longer working.
I installed watir just before you bumped to 1.6 but have been busy
with other things at work and was just now starting on the tutorial.
Is someone slated
Pettichord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is unclear to me what examples you mean.
Examples that had been included in the 1.5 source tree were moved to the
wiki.http://wiki.openqa.org/display/WTR/Examples
Bret
Chuck vdL wrote:
I think I found them back on the 1.5 branch, but the trunk based links
I think JArkelen points out something fairly valuable here.
we're overloading the term 'logger' and that's causing confusion..
perhaps using more distinct nomenclature would be good?
In my view there is both Logging used for debugging of scripts or
how exactly the application is failing when
:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 17:23, Chuck vdL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't they be changed to reflect the new integration with
Firewatir
+1
You sound like you know what you are talking about (a lot of you's in this
short sentence). Would you do it?
Željko
--http://watirpodcast.com/alister
is there anything in the html that is defining something like an
'onclick' for that thing? all I see in the code above is basically
just text..and normal text isn't clickable as far as I know.
maybe there's some other object that's actually overlapping that
button
On Nov 21, 11:30 am,
FYI: got this same builder doc error when I tried to install just
now..
Do we need to update the install instructions in the tutorial and such
to reflect that users might expect to see this error, and what (if
anything) they need to do about it?
Perhaps also update the 'Output should be
I'm having a look at Ruby in Steel as a potential IDE for doing
testing automation with Watir.
http://www.sapphiresteel.com/
Mostly because:
1) all my devs use Visual Studio for their work, so it puts me on the
same platform, gives me good integration with our source control etc.
2)
for their help!
On Nov 25, 4:37 pm, Chuck vdL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK so we can't see what the functions called by them do, but it does
look like there are 4 events getting defined.. have you tried using
code to fire one of the events (onmousedown seems the most obvious
candidate) to see
the parser
Paul
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Chuck vdL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a look at Ruby in Steel as a potential IDE for doing
testing automation with Watir.
http://www.sapphiresteel.com/
Mostly because:
1) all my devs use Visual Studio for their work, so
my_method( 4,5,6) # produces you didnt supply 2 args
Paul
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Chuck vdL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK so I went and looked.. it's not javascript
-=-=- snip-=-=
class Radio RadioCheckCommon
def initialize *args
=-=-=-= snip =-=-=-=
its the * in *args
do as you describe - add brackets round it all.
To submit a patch, open a jira ticket and do a diff of what you have
compared to the current svn
Im sure how to do that is described on the wiki or in this list
Paul
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Chuck vdL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK
On Dec 1, 12:14 pm, Bret Pettichord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please do note that all of the examples you've found so far represent
correct Ruby code. In many cases with Ruby, parentheses are optional.
It might be best if you reported your findings to the Ruby in Steel
people so that they can
and Watir both. I'm rather hoping that it's
something simple I've not done right and not a bug, but we will have
to see how the Sapphire people respond.
On Dec 1, 12:58 pm, Chuck vdL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 12:14 pm, Bret Pettichord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please do note that all
Is 'Blah the actual value defined in the HTML for that listbox
item, or is perhaps the browser UI visually truncating something
longer down to what will fit in available space for the way the
listbox is defined?
On Dec 1, 1:11 pm, Moochie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason when I
There was another thread here in the last week on just this same sort
of thing. try reading this thread, which I think had sample code and
all http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general/browse_thread/
thread/fc0e667e13574a61?hl=en#
You'll need to fire the onclick event for that object, you
Is this on the todo list?
I was just there and noticed that the info still indicates it's
windows only, ie only, there's no release notice for 1.6.2 under
'latest news, and is the development status still actually considered
to be 'beta' ?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
try mouseup instead of mousedown..
some webdevs seem to like to use two events, one to take care of the
visual effect when you 'press' the button down, and another than
actually makes things happen when the mouse button is released. (a
side effect of this btw is that if a user 'slides' off the
gah just noticed typo in the below.. the method is of
course .text not .txt as I've typed it
On Dec 9, 1:20 pm, Chuck vdL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's possible the regular expression isn't matching ..
The first thing I'd do to debug is remove the split and just puts ksh
to see what
The set option is a nice way to be able to run the very same script
against both browsers without having to edit the script itself. e.g.
run in one system set for IE, and it uses IE, run it on another system
set for firefox, and it uses firefox..
but speaking of that, if both are used, which
5.Can be used for Load Testing?
ok I'm gonna get up on a soapbox for a moment.
THIS is a bogus requirement. If you want to say simple or
rudimentary loadtesting then I can accept it, but ANY tool maker
that claims their tool is good for both functional testing at the UI
level, and can ALSO
are not
normally the things that cause load issues.. so it's good for really
basic tests, but again not terribly useful for most serious
loadtests.
On Jan 4, 3:35 am, Alex Collins a.j.collins...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 Jan 2009, at 07:13, Chuck vdL wrote:
5.Can be used for Load Testing
I've been playing with the CLReport example html reporting class, I've
added the concept of a 'blocked' test (e.g. if you were going to check
the URL of a link, but the link doesn't exist)
and also have what I think might be slightly more useful examples of
how to use it (by creating a
22 matches
Mail list logo