Re: [webkit-dev] About 165 Editing Tests Require Rebaselines per Bug 51389

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > I'm specifically asking for the convenient time for Chromium, GTK, Qt, and > Windows ports since they have test bots running on build.webkit.org. For Qt, most people are in CET timezone. It would be nice if you wait for the test bot to be ba

Re: [webkit-dev] About 165 Editing Tests Require Rebaselines per Bug 51389

En 02/03/11 10:53, Benjamin escribiu: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Ryosuke Niwa > wrote: > > I'm specifically asking for the convenient time for Chromium, GTK, > Qt, and Windows ports since they have test bots running on > build.webkit.org

Re: [webkit-dev] About 165 Editing Tests Require Rebaselines per Bug 51389

Since Windows 7 is green now, can I try to land it 2 hours from now? http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2011&month=3&day=2&hour=11&min=0&sec=0&p1=248&p2=195&p3=179&p4=224 - Ryosuke On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Sergio Villar Senin wrote: > En 02/03/11 10:53, Benjam

Re: [webkit-dev] About 165 Editing Tests Require Rebaselines per Bug 51389

I'm in CET, but I'm flexible. I will have time between 08:00-02:00 in CET, 17:00-11:00 in PST and 0:00-18:00 in JST. Please tell me the exact time and I will be online at the time. Ossy Ryosuke Niwa írta: *When is the best time to land a massive patch that requires rebaselines of about 165 test

Re: [webkit-dev] About 165 Editing Tests Require Rebaselines per Bug 51389

Ooops, I miscalculated. :) (All times are in 24h format.) The following interval is good for me everyday. 08:00 - 02:00 in CET 23:00 - 17:00 in PST 16:00 - 10:00 in JST Osztrogonac Csaba írta: I'm in CET, but I'm flexible. I will have time between 08:00-02:00 in CET, 17:00-11:00 in PST and 0:00

Re: [webkit-dev] What is Alias on Bugzilla?

On Mar 2, 2011, at 2:33 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > I just realized that there's a new field labelled Alias on > https://bugs.webkit.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=WebKit > > Why is this field added and what should I put in this field? The Alias field allows a bug to be referred to by something other

Re: [webkit-dev] What is Alias on Bugzilla?

Ah, ok. Thanks for the clarification. - Ryosuke On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Adam Roben wrote: > On Mar 2, 2011, at 2:33 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > I just realized that there's a new field labelled Alias on > https://bugs.webkit.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=WebKit > > Why is this field added

[webkit-dev] All Apple Mac and Windows testers now upload crash logs

Hi all- All of Apple's Mac and Windows test bots should now be uploading crash logs to build.webkit.org [1]. The crash logs are linked to from results.html (e.g., ). If you see a crash on one of Apple'

Re: [webkit-dev] About 165 Editing Tests Require Rebaselines per Bug 51389

The patch has been landed successfully. Thanks all for your help. - Ryosuke On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > Hi, > > *When is the best time to land a massive patch that requires rebaselines > of about 165 tests?* > > I'm going to land my > patch

[webkit-dev] Criteria for becoming a "core" builder

Hi all- I'd like to understand better what the criteria are for a builder to become a "core" builder. We've been putting lot of effort into keeping the Windows testers green lately (especially the Windows 7 Release (Tests) builder), and it seems like it would be good for them to eventually joi

Re: [webkit-dev] Criteria for becoming a "core" builder

I'm somewhat sad at having helped create this concept of "Core", since it's generated much confusion. It was/is intended more as a way to get non-stable buildbots off the main page, and away from distracting developers and bots. IMO the core list should be *descriptive* rather than *prescriptive

Re: [webkit-dev] All Apple Mac and Windows testers now upload crash logs

Does this require special configuration on the bots, or should run-webkit-tests be copying crash logs into layout-test-results for all Snow Leopard machines? I ask, because the EWS and commit-queue snow leopard machines do not seem to be copying crash logs into layout-test-results like I would exp

Re: [webkit-dev] All Apple Mac and Windows testers now upload crash logs

On Mar 2, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Eric Seidel wrote: > Does this require special configuration on the bots, or should > run-webkit-tests be copying crash logs into layout-test-results for > all Snow Leopard machines? run-webkit-tests should be copying crash logs into layout-test-results for all Snow L

Re: [webkit-dev] Criteria for becoming a "core" builder

On Mar 2, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Eric Seidel wrote: > So if you believe the windows bots are regularly green, you should > make them Core. Well, they are regularly green except for the cases I mentioned. The biggest problem is people making changes that cause tests to fail on Windows and not noticin

Re: [webkit-dev] Criteria for becoming a "core" builder

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Eric Seidel wrote: > IMO the core list should be *descriptive* rather than *prescriptive*. > If a bot is regularly green, it should be core. If its not, it should > be non-core.  We should not remove bots we "don't like", or add bots > we "hope to stay green". Whil

[webkit-dev] WebKit Inspector - Working with Breakpoints

I've used fiddler2 in some special cases, and it's really come in handy with experimenting on live sites. Fiddler2 just acts as a simple http proxy, to hijack requests to particular resources and redirect them to another location and/or local file. The breakpoints mechanism in WebKit inspector

Re: [webkit-dev] All Apple Mac and Windows testers now upload crash logs

On Mar 2, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Eric Seidel wrote: > the EWS and commit-queue snow leopard machines do not > seem to be copying crash logs into layout-test-results like I would > expect: > https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51138 > (each of those zips are made from /tmp/layout-test-results after