-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
> About the parser... I'm thinking I can hack the parser that now
> handles the K, M, etc. suffixes so it works as it did before but also
> sees a '%' suffix as valid- that would reduce the amount of code
> necessary to implement
Tony Godshall wrote:
> If it was me, I'd have it default to backing off to 95% by default and
> have options for more aggressive behavior, like the multiple
> connections, etc.
I don't like a default back-off rule. I often encounter downloads with
often changing download speeds. The idea that the
Greetings,
Was the feature being discussed here
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05546.html
and here
http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05577.html
ever get implemented?
In other words, is it possible to do:
wget --bind-address=1.2.3.4:2000-3000 http://...
>From trying i
Micah -
I haven't tested this yet, but I've been pondering on the impact of having
a dependency on Hg for the actual build process of Wget. Seems like an
awful lot of trouble for a product that in the past has only needed
Make|Nmake and a C compiler.
Is it possible with Hg to create a file
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Tony Godshall wrote:
> > About the parser... I'm thinking I can hack the parser that now
> > handles the K, M, etc. suffixes so it works as it did before but also
> > sees a '%' suffix as val
On 10/17/07, Matthias Vill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Godshall wrote:
> > If it was me, I'd have it default to backing off to 95% by default and
> > have options for more aggressive behavior, like the multiple
> > connections, etc.
>
> I don't like a default back-off rule. I often encounter
> ... Perhaps it should be one of those things that one can do
> oneself if one must but is generally frowned upon (like making a
> version of wget that ignores robots.txt).
Damn. I was only joking about ignoring robots.txt, but now I'm
thinking[1] there may be good reasons to do so... maybe it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
(Accidentally sent private reply).
Tony Godshall wrote:
> On 10/17/07, Matthias Vill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tony Godshall wrote:
>>> If it was me, I'd have it default to backing off to 95% by default and
>>> have options for more aggressive b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Guess I was forgetting to hit "Reply-All" today... resent to list.
Christopher G. Lewis wrote:
> Micah -
>
> I haven't tested this yet, but I've been pondering on the impact of having
> a dependency on Hg for the actual build process of Wget. See
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
>> ... Perhaps it should be one of those things that one can do
>> oneself if one must but is generally frowned upon (like making a
>> version of wget that ignores robots.txt).
>
> Damn. I was only joking about ignoring robots.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Oleg Ace wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Was the feature being discussed here
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05546.html
> and here
> http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05577.html
> ever get implemented?
>
> In other words, is
> Tony Godshall wrote:
> >> ... Perhaps it should be one of those things that one can do
> >> oneself if one must but is generally frowned upon (like making a
> >> version of wget that ignores robots.txt).
> >
> > Damn. I was only joking about ignoring robots.txt, but now I'm
> > thinking[1] there
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Oleg Ace wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Was the feature being discussed here
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sunsite.dk/msg05546.html
> > and here
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/wget@sun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Tony Godshall wrote:
>> Well, I'm don't have much to say about about the other points but one
>> certainly does not need to keep an array for something like this- with
>> the classic pseudorandom shuffle algorithm you only need to keep a
>> count of
On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Tony Godshall wrote:
> >> Well, I'm don't have much to say about about the other points but one
> >> certainly does not need to keep an array for something like this- with
> >> the classic ps
On 10/17/07, Tony Godshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Tony Godshall wrote:
> > >> Well, I'm don't have much to say about about the other points but one
> > >> certainly does not nee
On 10/17/07, Tony Godshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/17/07, Tony Godshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/17/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA256
> > >
> > > Tony Godshall wrote:
> > > >> Well, I'm don't have much to sa
Well, I got the mercurial version of wget to build (and look at).
README.checkout talks about subversion, and autogen.sh (which isn't there,
I did an autoreconf).
Also, there's a GNUmakefile in the repository -- I guess its not necessary
to build (so we can configure in other directories).
mart
18 matches
Mail list logo
