AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] yet another "WiMAX vs LTE" article
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Chuck Profito
wrote:
> Actually we have found Ruckus to do very well with multipath! i.e. boat
> docks, moving water, moving boats, moving rolled tin structure
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Chuck Profito wrote:
> Actually we have found Ruckus to do very well with multipath! i.e. boat
> docks, moving water, moving boats, moving rolled tin structure, generating
> killer multipath, kills EVERY OTHER ROUTER/AP EXCEPT RUCKUS. try it ,
> you'll like it.
C
ral List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] yet another "WiMAX vs LTE" article
> Since their beam forming is dynamic, I would expect it to work very well
> in that environment.
As Ruckus beamforming is based on selecting a receiver instead of
combining the signals, it should indeed deal with
> Since their beam forming is dynamic, I would expect it to work very well
> in that environment.
As Ruckus beamforming is based on selecting a receiver instead of
combining the signals, it should indeed deal with ducting but not too
well with multi-path.
> No Beam forming is expected from Ubiqui
Faisal Imtiaz
> At 7/1/2010 10:20 AM, awrote:
>
>> It would be interesting to see this So far the only folks who have
>> been successful with beamforming products (off the shelf easily
>> available) in the 802.11n have been the Ruckus Wireless Folks. They had
>> been sticking to indoor un
Anybody with a screwdriver and a Motorola PMP320 AP will find a DesignArt 2400
chipset under the hood of a $3500 BaseStation that is 802.16e mobile WiMAX
which does 2x2 MIMO. The same chipset also powers a 6x6 MIMO PureWave BTS @
3.65 GHz.
http://www.designartnetworks.com/InfoProducts.asp?Page
10:04 AM
To: ; "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] yet another "WiMAX vs LTE" article
> At 7/1/2010 10:20 AM, awrote:
>>It would be interesting to see this So far the only folks who have
>>been successful with beamforming products (off the shelf easily
At 7/1/2010 12:45 PM, Rogello wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
> > It's not a fair comparison. Some people (is this especially an American
> > disease?) treat everything as a one-on-one death match, and in
> this case act
> > as if there were a WiMAX Corp. duking it
At 7/1/2010 10:20 AM, awrote:
>It would be interesting to see this So far the only folks who have
>been successful with beamforming products (off the shelf easily
>available) in the 802.11n have been the Ruckus Wireless Folks. They had
>been sticking to indoor units because of their business re
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
> It's not a fair comparison. Some people (is this especially an American
> disease?) treat everything as a one-on-one death match, and in this case act
> as if there were a WiMAX Corp. duking it out with LTE Corp. for market
> supremacy. But
It would be interesting to see this So far the only folks who have
been successful with beamforming products (off the shelf easily
available) in the 802.11n have been the Ruckus Wireless Folks. They had
been sticking to indoor units because of their business relationships
with the Outdoor b
t; 813.426.4230 mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Rogelio
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 6:18 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] yet another "WiMAX vs LTE" article
>
At 7/1/2010 09:17 AM, Rogello wrote:
>I'm still getting my feet wet with the whole "4G thing" and found this
>interesting
>
>http://www.maravedis-bwa.com/Issues/5.29/Readmore3.html
>
>(Sorry if it's old news to many...)
>
>Almost everyone I know is betting (and betting big!) on LTE. The only
>ones
timately doomed it as a mobile
concept.
Patrick Leary
Aperto Networks
813.426.4230 mobile
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Rogelio
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 6:18 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] yet anothe
I'm still getting my feet wet with the whole "4G thing" and found this
interesting
http://www.maravedis-bwa.com/Issues/5.29/Readmore3.html
(Sorry if it's old news to many...)
Almost everyone I know is betting (and betting big!) on LTE. The only
ones I know holding out on WiMAX 2 are niche marke
15 matches
Mail list logo
