RE: [WSG]WCAG 2.0 enlarging text to 200% ?

2008-12-12 Thread Heather
14 À : wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Objet : Re: [WSG]WCAG 2.0 enlarging text to 200% ? Heather wrote: > I'm not really understanding this point very well and I'm not sure > how this is measurable and testable across a wide range of platforms? > What if the websites default size is

Re: [WSG]WCAG 2.0 enlarging text to 200% ?

2008-12-12 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Heather wrote: I'm not really understanding this point very well and I'm not sure how this is measurable and testable across a wide range of platforms? What if the websites default size is set in percentage to 75% and then another website has default setting of 110%? Doesn't really matter as

Re: [WSG]WCAG 2.0 enlarging text to 200% ?

2008-12-12 Thread Gareth Senior
aling can be calculated > from the default sizes in a similar fashion. > > Heather > > > -Message d'origine- > De : li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] De la > part de Patrick Lauke > Envoyé : vendredi 12 décembre 2008 11:39 > À : ws

RE: [WSG]WCAG 2.0 enlarging text to 200% ?

2008-12-12 Thread Heather
oup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] De la part de Patrick Lauke Envoyé : vendredi 12 décembre 2008 11:39 À : wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Objet : RE: [WSG]WCAG 2.0 enlarging text to 200% ? > Heather > With WCAG 2.0 finally coming out yesterday - I was wondering how many ctrl + clicks in (fire

RE: [WSG]WCAG 2.0 enlarging text to 200% ?

2008-12-12 Thread Patrick Lauke
> Heather > With WCAG 2.0 finally coming out yesterday - I was wondering how many ctrl + clicks in (firefox for example) 200% is? > I would say it was 3 but some colleagues argue 2 or 4 ? Any suggestions? I'd say conceptually that's quite a nitpicky argument...say a page broke spectacularly afte