On 11 May 2007, at 05:52:58, John Faulds wrote:
You really only need a dimension on the anchors to overcome an IE/
Windows bug when they're set to display: block so you can either
use * html #nav a { height: 1% } or conditional comments. You can
probably ignore my other comment about the
1. In the lefthand nav I would have liked to have some of the 2nd level
Œlink¹s not links. But my code is up the creek and I can¹t make them
line up
or be the same font size unless they¹re all links. Any clues on what I¹m
doing wrong here?
Are these IE problems? If so, it's because the
On 11/5/07 12:30 PM, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. In the lefthand nav I would have liked to have some of the 2nd level
Œlink¹s not links. But my code is up the creek and I can¹t make them
line up
or be the same font size unless they¹re all links. Any clues on what I¹m
doing
Can't help you with your Mac problems, I can only tell you what I see in
Windows (and the suggested fixes will still apply), but for the footer
problem, remove */ from just above /* FOOTER STYLE */ - it's closing a
comment that's not opened.
On Fri, 11 May 2007 13:00:49 +1000, Susie
Thanks John.
I found the errant */ and the footer is working as it should, so thanks
for that. I don't know where my brain is this afternoon - frozen up I think!
Would you mind explaining what the fixes actually are? If I give the anchor
(link) styles a width, I'm not clear how to do that and
You really only need a dimension on the anchors to overcome an IE/Windows
bug when they're set to display: block so you can either use * html #nav a
{ height: 1% } or conditional comments. You can probably ignore my other
comment about the hasLayout issue because I assumed it was an IE
We've worked out that the issue was caused by the comments in the HTML
file. Has anyone had this sort of issue before? If there a solution
other then removing the comments?
Cheers
D
On 11/4/05, Darren Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello fellow standardites,
I'm losing hair over a very
Hi Darren,
I haven't reviewed the bug, however if its anything like the issue we've come
across with comments [1] then you could try an alternative method of commenting
the code. (This goes somewhat to the concept of semantic markup also.)
Rather than:
!-- begin footer --
div id=footer
...
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Kirkwood|Motive
Sent: Friday, 4 November 2005 3:53 p.m.
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Help needed with IE drama...
Hi Darren,
I haven't reviewed the bug, however if its anything like the issue we've
come