[...]
Harry wrote:
>> rm \-c
>> rm: illegal option -- c
>> usage: rm [-fiRr] file ...
>>
>> Ditto for:
>>
>> [\-]c
>> '-c'
>> *c
>> '-'c
>> \075c
>>
>> OK, I'm out of escapes. or other tricks... other than using emacs but
>> I haven't installed emacs as yet.
>>
>> I can just ignore them
Somehow I touched some rather peculiar file names in ~. Experimenting
with something I've now forgotten I guess.
Anyway I now have 3 zero length files with names -O, -c, -k.
I've tried as many styles of escaping as I could come up with but all
are rejected like this:
rm \-c
rm: illegal opt
Gregory Shaw writes:
> I looked into btrfs some time ago for the same reasons. I had a Linux
> system that I wanted to do more intelligent things with storage.
Great details, thanks.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mai
Edward Ned Harvey
writes:
> I recently put my first btrfs system into production. Here are the
> similarities/differences I noticed different between btrfs and zfs:
Great input.. thanks for the details.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@openso
Freddie Cash writes:
> If you only want RAID0 or RAID1, then btrfs is okay. There's no support for
> RAID5+ as yet, and it's been "in development" for a couple of years now.
[...] snipped excellent information
Thanks much, I've very appreciative of the good information. Much
better to hear f
This subject may have been ridden to death... I missed it if so.
Not wanting to start a flame fest or whatever but
As a common slob who isn't very skilled, I like to see some commentary
from some of the pros here as to any comparison of zfs against btrfs.
I realize btrfs is a lot less `finis
I've posted this some time ago but lost track of the subject line and
answers.
My zfs machine has croaked to the point that it just quits after some
10 15 minutes of uptime. No interesting logs or messages what so
ever. At least not that I've found. It just quietly quits.
I'm not interested in
Andrew Gabriel writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I have a sneaking feeling I'm missing something really obvious.
>>
>> If you have zfs fs that see little use and have lost track of whether
>> changes may have occurred since last snapshot, is there some handy w
I have a sneaking feeling I'm missing something really obvious.
If you have zfs fs that see little use and have lost track of whether
changes may have occurred since last snapshot, is there some handy way
to determine if a snapshot matches its filesystem. Or put another
way, some way to determine
f media via CIFS to windows
> clients for a couple of years or more.
Good news there thanks for the input.
Harry wrote:
> On 11/21/10 Nov 21, 8:43 PM, "Harry Putnam" wrote:
>
>> When *.mov file reside on a windows host, and assuming your browser
>> has the right plugin
I find that at least some kinds of video files when accessed on zfs
server from windows machines will not work. In particular that seems
to hold for quicktime files.
When *.mov file reside on a windows host, and assuming your browser
has the right plugins, you can open them with either quicktime
Mike Gerdts writes:
[...]
Thanks for suggestions and I have closed it all up to see if there was
a difference.
> Perhaps this belongs somewhere other than zfs-discuss - it has nothing
> to do with zfs.
Yes... it does, It started out much nearer to belonging here.
Not sure now how to switch to
Peter Jeremy writes:
> See the archives for lots more discussion on suggested systems for ZFS.
Any suggested search stings? Maybe at search.gmane.org
It would be too lucky to expect someone has a list of some good (up to
date) setups a home NAS fellow could be inspired by eh?
I know there is a
Peter Jeremy writes:
>>It seems there ought to be something, some kind of evidence and clues
>>if I only knew how to look for them, in the logs.
>
> Serious hardware problems are unlikely to be in the logs because the
> system will die before it can write the error to disk and sync the
> disks.
Krunal Desai writes:
> With an A64, I think a thermal shutdown would instantly halt CPU
> execution, removing the chance to write any kind of log message.
> memtest will report any errors in RAM; perhaps when the ARC expands to
> the upper-stick of memory it hits the bad bytes and crashes.
>
> Ca
If I were to decide my current setup is too problem beset to continue
using it, is there a guide or some good advice I might employ to scrap
it out and build something newer and better in the old roomy midtower?
I don't mean the hardware part, although I no doubt will need advice
right through tha
Toby Thain writes:
> On 27/10/10 4:21 PM, Krunal Desai wrote:
>> I believe he meant a memory stress test, i.e. booting with a
>> memtest86+ CD and seeing if it passed.
>
> Correct. The POST tests are not adequate.
Got it. Thank you.
Short of doing such a test, I have evidence already that ma
Krunal Desai writes:
> I believe he meant a memory stress test, i.e. booting with a
> memtest86+ CD and seeing if it passed. Even if the memory is OK, the
> stress from that test may expose defects in the power supply or other
> components.
>
> Your CPU temperature is 56C, which is not out-of-lin
Toby Thain writes:
> On 27/10/10 3:14 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> It seems my hardware is getting bad, and I can't keep the os running
>> for more than a few minutes until the machine shuts down.
>>
>> It will run 15 or 20 minutes and then shutdown
>> I
It seems my hardware is getting bad, and I can't keep the os running
for more than a few minutes until the machine shuts down.
It will run 15 or 20 minutes and then shutdown
I haven't found the exact reason for it.
Or really any thing in logs that seems like a reason.
It may be because I don't k
Cindy Swearingen writes:
> Hi Harry,
>
> Generally, you need to use zpool clear to clear the pool errors, but I
> can't reproduce the removed files reappearing in zpool status on my own
> system when I corrupt data so I'm not sure this will help. Some other
> larger problem is going on here...
>
Ian Collins writes:
> On 10/21/10 03:47 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> build 133
>> zpool version 22
>>
>> I'm getting:
>>
>> zpool status:
>> NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
>> z3 DEGRADED 0 0
build 133
zpool version 22
I'm getting:
zpool status:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
z3 DEGRADED 0 0 167
mirror-0 DEGRADED 0 0 334
c5d0DEGRADED 0 0 335 too many errors
c6d0DEGRADED 0
Harry Putnam writes:
[...]
> I can't get X up ... it just went to a black screen, after seeing the
> main login screen, logging in to consol and calling:
WHOOPS, omitted some information here...
Calling:
`startx /usr/bin/dbus-launch --exit-with-session gnome-session' from
c
Ian Collins writes:
[...]
>> I'm kind of having a brain freeze about this:
>> So what are the standard tests or cmds to run to collect enough data
>> to try to make a determination of what the problem is?
>>
>>
> Your motherboard manual would be the best place to look, it sounds
> like the B
Osol b134
I'm experiencing a forced shutdown of a machine.
It is proceeded with a number of beeps in a steady pattern like
beep beep beep beep beep beep
And onward. 2 beeps pause 2 beeps pause... etc.
The beeps are the same tone on each set of beeps but each has
Cassandra Pugh writes:
> I am trying to set this up as an automount.
>
> Currently I am trying to set mounts for each area, but I have a lot to
> mount.
>
> When I run showmount -e nfs_server I do see all of the shared directories.
I ran into this same problem some mnths ago... I can't remember
Cindy Swearingen writes:
> Hi Harry,
>
> Both du and df are pre-ZFS commands and don't really understand ZFS
> space issues, which are described in the ZFS FAQ here:
>
> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+zfs/faq
>
> Why does du(1) report different file sizes for ZFS and UFS? Why
Harry Putnam writes:
> I'm seeing a really big (to big to be excused lightly) difference with
> the 2 zfs native methods zpool and rpool
Typo alert: The above line should have read:
the 2 zfs native methods ZPOOL list and ZFS list
> compared to 2 native un
Will Murnane writes:
> It's important to consider what you want this data for. Considering
> upgrading your storage to get more room? Check out "zpool list".
> Need to know whether accounting or engineering is using more space?
> Look at "zfs list". Looking at a sparse or compressed file, and
Will Murnane writes:
> In short, there are many commands because there are many answers, and
> many questions. No single tool has all the information available to
> it.
Thanks for such a complete answer... and nicely put too.
___
zfs-discuss mailing
Erik Trimble writes:
>> Do you think it would be a problem having a second sata card in a PCI
>> slot? That would be 8 sata ports in all, since the A-open AK86
>> motherboard has 2 built in. Or should I swap out the 2prt for the 4
>> prt. I really only need 2 more prts currently, but would be
Seems like you can get some pretty large discrepancies in sizes of
pools. and directories.
zpool list
zfs list
du
All have different readings for each and every pool.
Then zfs and du will differ on each fs inside the pool.
I don't understand why this late in the game there is not some
canonic
Erik Trimble writes:
> Since we're talking about an old PCI slot here, I'd say there's really
> two good options:
>
> A SiliconImage Sil3114-based card, which is a 32-bit/66Mhz card, with
> 4 SATA-1 ports, usually for $25
>
> A Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 card, which is a 64-bit/100Mhz PCI-X card
> (
Tim Cook writes:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> "Eric D. Mudama" writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Apr 15 at 23:57, Günther wrote:
>> >>hello
>> >>
>> >>if you are looking for pci-e (8x), i would rec
"Eric D. Mudama" writes:
> On Thu, Apr 15 at 23:57, Günther wrote:
>>hello
>>
>>if you are looking for pci-e (8x), i would recommend sas/sata controller
>>with lsi 1068E sas chip. they are nearly perfect with opensolaris.
>
> For just a bit more, you can get the LSI SAS 9211-9i card which is
> 6
Brandon High writes:
[...]
Harry wrote:
>> So having some data on rpool (besides the OS I mean) is not
>> necessarily a bad thing then?
Daniel C answered:
>> Not at all; laptops would be screwed otherwise.
Brandon H. responded:
> The pool will resilver faster if it's got less data on it, wh
Daniel Carosone writes:
[...] snipped welcome info... thanks.
> Oh, another thing, just to make sure before you start, since this is
> evidently older hardware: are you running a 32-bit or 64-bit kernel?
> The 32-bit kernel won't use drives larger than 1TB.
Its an athlon64 so I'm good there.
_
Brandon High writes:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> But as someone suggested it might be better to get two more bigger
>> drives. 1t or 1.5t would handle all my data on one pair.
>>
>> Then I guess after moving all the data to a single zpoo
Daniel Carosone writes:
> For Harry's benefit, the recipe we're talking about here is roughly as
> follows. Your pools z2 and z3, we will merge into z2. and
> are the current members of z3.
[...] snipped very handy outline
Thank you. That kind of walk through is really helpful here.
I have
Daniel Carosone writes:
Thanks for the input.. very helpful.
[...]
> No, as above. You might consider new disks for a new rpool (say, ssd
> with some zil or l2arc) and reusing the current disks for data if
> they're the same as the other data disks.
Would you mind expanding the abbrevs: ssd z
[Note: This discussion started in another thread
Subject: about backup and mirrored pools
but the subject has been significantly changed so started a new
thread]
Bob Friesenhahn writes:
> Luckily, since you are using mirrors, you can easily migrate disks
> from your existing extra pools to
Bob Friesenhahn writes:
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>>>> Am I way wrong on this, and further I'm curious if it would make more
>>>> versatile use of the space if I were to put the mirrored pairs into
>>>> one big pool containing
Richard Jahnel writes:
[...]
> Perhaps mirrored sets with daily snapshots and a knowedge of how to
> mount snapshots as clones so that you can pull a copy of that file
> you deleted 3 days ago. :)
I've been doing that with the default auto snapshot setup, but hadn't
noticed a need to mount a sn
Bob Friesenhahn writes:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>
>> Am I way wrong on this, and further I'm curious if it would make more
>> versatile use of the space if I were to put the mirrored pairs into
>> one big pool containing 3 mirrored pairs (6 d
"David Dyer-Bennet" writes:
[...]
>> Am I way wrong on this, and further I'm curious if it would make more
>> versatile use of the space if I were to put the mirrored pairs into
>> one big pool containing 3 mirrored pairs (6 discs)
>
> Well, my own thinking doesn't consider that adequate for my
When I started using zfs a while back, I got the impression that
setting my home server up with mirror sets rather than some kind of
zraid would offer the most reliable setup for my data.
My data is just what you'd expect on a home lan... no real commercial
value involved.
I've since created 2 zp
mingli writes:
> Thank Erik, and I will try it, but the new question is that the root
> of the NFS server mapped as nobody at the NFS client.
>
> For this issue, I set up a new test NFS server and NFS client, and
> with the same option, at this test environment, the file owner
> mapped correctly,
Hoping to hear from someone who has similar equipment:
athlon64 3400+ - abit motherboard (unknown model)
The mobo has 2 built in sata controllers, probably the older 1.5 gb
kind.
And a pci adaptic 1205a (two sata ports [internal], also 1.5 gb)
I want to install a different pci sata controller w
Just to apologize
This not only sounds lame but IS pretty lame.
Somehow in reading the output of `zpool status POOL', I just blew right
by the URL included there:
http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P
Which has quite a decent discussion of what it means.
_
Harry Putnam writes:
> Ethan writes:
>
>>> Assuming your drives support SMART, I'd install smartmontools and see if
>> there are any SMART errors on the drive. While the absence of SMART errors
>
> [...]
>
>> I've had trouble getting smartmontools
Ethan writes:
>> Assuming your drives support SMART, I'd install smartmontools and see if
> there are any SMART errors on the drive. While the absence of SMART errors
[...]
> I've had trouble getting smartmontools to work with some of my
> controllers/drives in opensolaris, and have had better
Bob Friesenhahn writes:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> What to do with a status report like the one included below?
>>
>> What does it mean to have an unrecoverable error but no data errors?
>
> I think that this summary means that the zfs scrub di
What to do with a status report like the one included below?
What does it mean to have an unrecoverable error but no data errors?
Is it just a matter of `clearing' this device? But what would have
prompted such a report then?
Also note the numeral 7 in the CKSUM column for device c3d1s0. What
Christine Tran writes:
>> OOps, I may have looked at the wrong bart.
>
> I think he meant this BART:
> http://blogs.sun.com/gbrunett/entry/automating_solaris_10_file_integrity
>
> I'm going to make one quick comment about this, despite better
> judgment to probably keep quiet. I don't think anyo
Harry Putnam writes:
> At just a quick read, it really just sounds like rsync, after its been in a
> severe wreck and was badly crippled.
OOps, I may have looked at the wrong bart. One of the first hits
google turned up was:
http://www.zhornsoftware.co.uk/bart/index.html
But I think
Brandon High writes:
> Someone pointed out that you can use bart, but that also scans the
> directories. It might do what you want, but it doesn't work at the zpool /
> zfs level, just at the file level layer.
Apparently I missed any suggestion about bart, but looking it up just
now, I guess may
Matt Cowger writes:
> zfs list | grep '@'
>
> zpool/f...@1154758324G - 461G -
> zpool/f...@1208482 6.94G - 338G -
> zpool/f...@daily.netbackup 1.07G - 344G -
> zpool/f...@1154758
Matt Cowger writes:
> This is totally doable, and a reasonable use of zfs snapshots - we
> do some similar things.
Good, thanks for the input.
> You can easily determine if the snapshot has changed by checking the
> output of zfs list for the snapshot.
Do you mean to just grep it out of the ou
This may be a bit dimwitted since I don't really understand how
snapshots work. I mean the part concerning COW (copy on right) and
how it takes so little room.
But here I'm not asking about that.
It appears to me that the default snapshot setup shares some aspects
of a vcs (version control syste
Erik Trimble writes:
[...]
> The Warning only applies to this circumstance: if you've upgraded
> from an older build, then upgrading the zpool /may/ mean that you will
> NOT be able to reboot to the OLDER build and still read the
> now-upgraded zpool.
Lots of good details snipped... thanks for
Running b133
When you see this line in a `zpool status' report:
status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The
pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable.
Is it safe and effective to heed the advice given in next line:
action: Upgrade the pool using
"Andrew Daugherity" writes:
>> And I update the sharenfs option with "rw,ro...@100.198.100.0/24",
>> it works fine, and the NFS client can do the write without error.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> I've found that when using hostnames in the sharenfs line, I had to use
> the FQDN; the short hostname did not
David Dyer-Bennet writes:
> On 3/9/2010 4:57 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Also - it appears `zpool scrub -s z3' doesn't really do anything.
>> The status report above is taken immediately after a scrub command.
>>
>> The `scub -s' command just returns th
Cindy Swearingen writes:
> Hi Harry,
>
> Reviewing other postings where permanent errors where found on
> redundant ZFS configs, one was resolved by re-running the zpool scrub
> and one
> resolved itself because the files with the permanent errors were most
> likely temporary files.
what search
[First, a brief apology. I inadvertently posted this message to the
`general' group when it should have been to the `zfs' group.
In that last few days I seem to be all thumbs when posting.. and have
created several bumbling posts to opensolaris lists.
]
summary:
A zfs fs set with smb and nfs
I'm a little at a loss here as to what to do about these two errors
that turned up during a scrub.
The discs involved are a matched pair in mirror mode.
zpool status -v z3 (wrapped for mail):
---- ---=--- -
scrub: scrub completed after 1h
[I hope this isn't a repost double whammy. I posted this message
under `Message-ID: <87fx4ai5sp@newsguy.com>' over 15 hrs ago but
it never appeared on my nntp server (gmane) far as I can see]
I'm a little at a loss here as to what to do about these two errors
that turned up during a scrub.
T
Harry Putnam writes:
> [Note: This is a repost of question posted about 1.5 days ago that
> has never appeared on the group.. at least not on my server (gmane).
> Sorry if it ends up being a double whammy]
Apparently I missed two informative answers by:
Henrik J. Bob F.
Thanks for
[Note: This is a repost of question posted about 1.5 days ago that
has never appeared on the group.. at least not on my server (gmane).
Sorry if it ends up being a double whammy]
Working from a remote linux machine on a zfs fs that is an nfs mounted
share (set for nfs availability on zfs server, m
Working from a remote linux machine on a zfs fs that is an nfs mounted
share (set for nfs availability on zfs server, mounted nfs on linux);
I've been noticing a certain kind of sloth when messing with files.
What I see: After writing a file it seems to take the fs too long to
be able to display
I think I asked this before but apparently have lost track of the
answers I got.
I'm wanting a general rule of thumb for how often to `scrub'.
My setup is a home NAS and general zfs server so it does not see heavy
use.
I'm up to build 129 and do update fairly often, just the last few
builds were
I've been running mirrored disks on several pairs of disks. Mostly on
the advice of old timers here.
I wondered if I were to do something like
`rm -rf /$SomeUnexpectedlyEmptyVar' flattening and removing `/',
would I be able to retrieve it from the mirror?
I know about snapshots etc... but sud
As just a home tinkerer with small needs... I've already run into
situations where I've created a zfs fs for some purpose... and mnths
later forgotten what it was for or supposed to do or hold.
I may recognize the files and directories... but have forgotten why
its in this particular fs as opposed
A Darren Dunham writes:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 06:53:15PM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I don't get that... I was thinking of something like
>>
>> set use:"z3 use - mirror rhosts public_html"
>
> Probably something more like:
> zfs set loc
"David Dyer-Bennet" writes:
> On Tue, October 6, 2009 19:02, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Harry Putnam writes:
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>
>>> Trying my best shot...:
>>> zfs set use:"use to mirror rhosts public_html" z3
>&
Harry Putnam writes:
[...]
>
> Trying my best shot...:
> zfs set use:"use to mirror rhosts public_html" z3
Egad the `=' somehow went right past me
Sorry for the line noise.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-disc
Richard Elling writes:
> On Oct 6, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> I'm guessing there is some mechanism for this and I'm just slow on
>> picking up on it... is there a way to make annotations about a zpools
>> structure or intended use .. that
I'm guessing there is some mechanism for this and I'm just slow on
picking up on it... is there a way to make annotations about a zpools
structure or intended use .. that sort of stuff... that shows up in
`zfs list' or some other command?
I guess the next step would be a way to show all annotation
I would like some input about the use of zfs snapshot.
The Auto snapshot is nice on rpool but in some of the other zfs fs
I've created that kind of frequency doesn't seem necessary.
However generating my own cron setup for a dozen or so fs to create
snapshots, maybe only when data is transferred,
Scott Laird writes:
> Checksum all of the files using something like md5sum and see if
> they're actually identical. Then test each step of the copy and see
> which one is corrupting your files.
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
[...]
I didn't
During the course of backup I had occassion to copy a number of
quicktime video (*.mov) files to zfs server disk.
Once there... navigating to them with quicktime player and opening
results in a failure that (From windows Vista laptop) says:
error --43: A file could not be found (Welcome.mov)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Dennis Clarke writes:
>>
>> > This will probably get me bombed with napalm but I often just
>> > use star from Jörg Schilling because its dead easy :
>> >
>&
Dennis Clarke writes:
> This will probably get me bombed with napalm but I often just
> use star from Jörg Schilling because its dead easy :
>
> star -copy -p -acl -sparse -dump -C old_dir . new_dir
>
> and you're done.[1]
>
> So long as you have both the new and the old zfs/ufs/whatever[2]
> f
Ross Walker writes:
> Once the data is copied you can delete the snapshots that will then
> exist on both pools.
That's the part right there that wasn't apparent.
That
zfs send z1/someth...@snap |zfs receive z2/someth...@snap
Would also create z2/something
> If you have mount options set u
Richard Elling writes:
> You can only send/receive snapshots. However, on the receiving end,
> there will also be a dataset of the name you choose. Since you didn't
> share what commands you used, it is pretty impossible for us to
> speculate what you might have tried.
I thought I made it clea
Reading various bits of google output about send/receive I'm starting
to wonder if that process is maybe the wrong way to go at what I want
to do.
I have a filesystem z1/projects I want to remove it from the z1 pool
and put it in a z2 pool ending up with z2/projects. With all the same
data, same
I think this has probably been discussed here.. but I'm getting
confused about how to determine actual disk usage of zfs filesystems.
Here is an example:
$ du -sb callisto
46744 callisto
$ du -sb callisto/.zfs/snapshot
86076 callisto/.zfs/snapshot
Two questions then.
I do need to add
cindy.swearin...@sun.com writes:
> Hi Harry,
>
> Are you attempting this change when logged in as yourself or
> as root?
my user
> The top section of this procedure describes how to add yourself
> to zfssnap role. Otherwise, if you are doing this step as a
> non-root user, it probably won't work
[...]
>
> Well yes actually you aren't looking for the snapshots the correct way.
[...]
>> No difference, and there is no rpool/dump
>> rpool/export
>> rpool/export/home
>> rpool/export/home/reader
>>
>> under either snapshot... not to mention all
Darren J Moffat writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I thought I recalled reading somewhere that in the situation where you
>> have several zfs filesystems under one top level directory like this:
>> rpool
>> rpool/ROOT/osol-112
>> rpool/export
>> rpool/
I thought I recalled reading somewhere that in the situation where you
have several zfs filesystems under one top level directory like this:
rpool
rpool/ROOT/osol-112
rpool/export
rpool/export/home
rpool/export/home/reader
you could do a shapshot encompassing everything below zpool instead of
havi
dick hoogendijk writes:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:38:18 -0500
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> How to turn off the timeslider snapshots on certain file systems?
>
> http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenSolarisInfo/How+to+Manage+the+Automatic+ZFS+Snapshot+Service
The first steps f
[...]
Richard wrote:
>> NB, the user and group quotas are stored as properties, but "get all" does
>> not return them. So it is not a true statement that "get all"
>> returns all of
>> the properties.
Darren M responded:
> There are are other "hidden" properties too.
>
> 'zfs get all' should be
How to turn off the timeslider snapshots on certain file systems?
Using:
System/Administration/timeslider from default desktop menu item
System, I see a dialog to first enable[x] timeslider. Then 3 columns
show a checkbox at lines with `mount point' and `File System' listed.
I had assumed that r
There is a lot more about snapshots and backup schemes that I don't
know than there is that I do know... My needs are pretty simple and
small compared to some of the heavy users here, but I'd like to run
just the rough idea by the group.
One backup I need to make is from to linux online servers t
"James C. McPherson" writes:
>
> your original question was somewhat vague - could you clarify
> what it is you need to find out?
>
I wanted to see a list of all the properties available to zfs on a
filesystem.
Your answer was very helpful... thanks My quick reply may not have
conveyed that
"James C. McPherson" writes:
[...]
> Is "zfs get all datasetname" not helping?
[...]
Gack... quite the reverse
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
How can I list out all the properties available for a filesystem?
Banging away in man zfs seems to be going nowhere pretty fast.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Harry Putnam writes:
> cindy.swearin...@sun.com writes:
>
> [...]
>> # zfs list -rt snapshot z3/www
> [...]
> Yeah... now were talking thanks
>
> I'm still a little curious though as to why
> `zfs list -t snapshot'
>
> By itself without a da
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
