Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-20 Thread Richard Miller
 Already done.  The inferno distribution contains, in /utils, all
 the Plan 9 xa, xc, xl (for x in [012568kv]) compilable by gcc.
 
 Would this be possible to use for a cross compiler with a Plan9
 target?

This *is* a cross compiler with a Plan 9 target.  It generates
Plan 9 binaries, which may be commands (to run under Plan 9 or 9vx)
or bootable files (e.g. kernels for Plan 9 or inferno, or stand-alone
programs for embedded hardware).

 I guess this port [1] might be a good starting point?
 
 [1] http://code.google.com/p/ken-cc/

That isn't a port, it's just the same xa,xc,xl utils referred
to above, removed from the inferno distribution and placed in
their own self-contained package.




Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-19 Thread ron minnich
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Jens Staal staal1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Alternatively - would a newlib approach be a better bet to get
 binutils/gcc going? I have been trying to read up on it and to try to
 locate the syscall information I need from plan9 libc. If anyone got
 any pointers on how to do this, it would be appreciated :)

I was unsure of the cross compiler idea. Was this to run on linux to
create plan 9 binaries?

If you really want to do that, just go ahead and port the plan 9 c
compilers etc. to unix. I did the amd64 linker in about 10 minutes.
It's very straightforward C code, far easier to port than the sort of
stuff you find in the GNU world -- someone once complained on this
list that Plan  9 C code was some sort of old usage or something --
they did not realize that was a *virtue*. The ?c would be a bit longer
to do but probably not much. Then you can compile all Plan 9 code on
Unix-like systems to target Plan 9.

That may not be what you meant.

ron



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-19 Thread Jens Staal
2011/9/19 ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com:
 On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Jens Staal staal1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Alternatively - would a newlib approach be a better bet to get
 binutils/gcc going? I have been trying to read up on it and to try to
 locate the syscall information I need from plan9 libc. If anyone got
 any pointers on how to do this, it would be appreciated :)

 I was unsure of the cross compiler idea. Was this to run on linux to
 create plan 9 binaries?

 If you really want to do that, just go ahead and port the plan 9 c
 compilers etc. to unix. I did the amd64 linker in about 10 minutes.
 It's very straightforward C code, far easier to port than the sort of
 stuff you find in the GNU world -- someone once complained on this
 list that Plan  9 C code was some sort of old usage or something --
 they did not realize that was a *virtue*. The ?c would be a bit longer
 to do but probably not much. Then you can compile all Plan 9 code on
 Unix-like systems to target Plan 9.

 That may not be what you meant.

 ron




Actually it was the complete opposite that I wanted :)
The aim I had was basically to compile legacy lunix applications for
Plan9 on a lunix host. For hobby development such a cross compiler +
9vx could be a really nice environment to cut your teeth on while
figuring out the right way to do things.

I have been playing with trying to compile some legacy lunix
applications under APE with or without the old gcc (anyone else
experience a crashed 9vx when you try to use gcc?). Often stuff fail
due to configure scripts expecting GNU sed, autoconf etc (the gmake
port works nicely!)... I guess the right way would be to try to dig
through what they want to do and make a real mk file to compile it
instead, but I hoped for a lazier approach ;)

So what I was thinking (perhaps naively) was first to just compile
the ported gcc/binutils (/n/sources/extra/gcc) (which should have all
the executeable information for Plan9 in it) + the GCC-ified APE libs
on Linux as a cross compiler for Plan9 (and thus NOT have to worry
about porting all of GNU to APE first...).

After trying to learn about cross compilers I saw this thing about
newlib, where it seems like you can make a cross compiler suspiciously
easily [1, 2]. But as I said previously. I am a complete noob on this
and unfortunately very limited time to actually make it work, but if
someone got something similar done before (I suppose the initial GCC
port was cross compiled from a lunix host of some kind?), it would be
interesting to get it working (and preferrably on an as modern
version of GCC as possible).

[1] http://wiki.osdev.org/Porting_Newlib
[2] http://wiki.osdev.org/Boomstick



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-19 Thread Charles Forsyth
i thought it was great that something called newlib would still have
to implement a function called isatty



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-19 Thread tlaronde
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 06:50:01PM +0100, Charles Forsyth wrote:
 i thought it was great that something called newlib would still have
 to implement a function called isatty

This has always been the problem with new: it doesn't last... Same
goes for something dated today...
-- 
Thierry Laronde tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com
  http://www.kergis.com/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89  250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-19 Thread erik quanstrom
On Mon Sep 19 14:08:02 EDT 2011, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
 On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 06:50:01PM +0100, Charles Forsyth wrote:
  i thought it was great that something called newlib would still have
  to implement a function called isatty
 
 This has always been the problem with new: it doesn't last... Same
 goes for something dated today...

doing is always dated today.

- erik



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-19 Thread Richard Miller
 just go ahead and port the plan 9 c
 compilers etc. to unix

Already done.  The inferno distribution contains, in /utils, all
the Plan 9 xa, xc, xl (for x in [012568kv]) compilable by gcc.




Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-19 Thread Jens Staal
2011/9/19 Richard Miller 9f...@hamnavoe.com:
 just go ahead and port the plan 9 c
 compilers etc. to unix

 Already done.  The inferno distribution contains, in /utils, all
 the Plan 9 xa, xc, xl (for x in [012568kv]) compilable by gcc.

Would this be possible to use for a cross compiler with a Plan9
target? A kencc port (preferably including the APE pcc) as a cross
compiler on a lunix host could potentially also be interesting if it
would work. I guess this port [1] might be a good starting point?

Any pointers on how it would be done?

[1] http://code.google.com/p/ken-cc/



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-16 Thread David du Colombier
 Is running Opera on Plan 9 an option?

Opera already runs fine in linuxemu.
I never tried the latest versions however.

/n/sources/contrib/cinap_lenrek/linuxemu3.tgz

 Also, I don't know how to get abaco running.

Abaco is included in Plan 9 since July 2009.

To run it, type:

% webcookies
% webfs
% abaco

-- 
David du Colombier



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-16 Thread cinap_lenrek
dont forget mothra!

--
cinap



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-16 Thread Richard Miller
 Abaco is included in Plan 9 since July 2009.
 
 To run it, type:
 
 % webcookies
 % webfs
 % abaco

Or even simpler: use readweb(1)




Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-16 Thread yy
2011/9/16 Jens Staal staal1...@gmail.com:
 - One thing I wonder there about 9vx is - can you add a command line
 argument to start a script in the plan9 that boots?

Yes. See 9vxp in 9vx(1). Also, have a look at acmevx in the bin
directory as inspiration.


-- 
- yiyus || JGL .



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-16 Thread Steve Simon
 That's a very interesting point. Implementing lguest on Plan 9 would
 require something like 13 system calls. Far easier than doing the
 near-400 system calls of linux correctly.

At the cost of running an entire linux kernel on plan9...

cinap's linuxem (with my hacks) implements 139 syscalls and
seems to run most things. I haven't tried opera recently but my test
environment is in-sync with the stable Debian release (squeeze).

-Steve



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-15 Thread dexen deVries
On Thursday 15 of September 2011 00:54:11 John Floren wrote:
 (...)
  I think you have seriously misapprehended many things about Plan 9.
 We don't have X. We are not Linux compatible, although there's a
 rather decent Linux emulator. There is no GTK, no Qt, no Firefox, no
 modern C++ compiler.
 
 I think it's time for people to stop telling the Plan 9 community
 what its goals should be, when these people haven't even booted Plan
 9.

I'm one of the `never even booted Plan 9' folks, and I agree with John 100%.

Let Plan 9 do things the Plan 9 way, for better or worse. And let the real 
needs influence what gets implemented first and what later on. If there's 
pressing need for /native/ full-blown browser, some of the likes of Abaco will 
be improved to that point.

If Plan 9 tries hard to emulate Linux first and innovate second, it'll become 
stagnant and irrelevant.

-- 
dexen deVries

[[[↓][→]]]

For example, if the first thing in the file is:
   ?kzy irefvba=1.0 rapbqvat=ebg13?
an XML parser will recognize that the document is stored in the traditional 
ROT13 encoding.

(( Joe English, http://www.flightlab.com/~joe/sgml/faq-not.txt ))



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-15 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:41:29 -0400
L N leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:

 The goal should be a Plan 9 distro that runs natively on AMD-64, and can
 open a web-browser.

That goal is a target moving at approximately the speed of light. 
Specifically, the open a web browser part of it is.

A virtualizer running on Plan 9 would waste far less time than implementing 
enough Linux syscalls to run a Linux distro new enough to run any browser newer 
than Opera 9.



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-15 Thread ron minnich
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis
eeke...@fastmail.fm wrote:
 On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:41:29 -0400
 L N leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:

 The goal should be a Plan 9 distro that runs natively on AMD-64, and can
 open a web-browser.

 That goal is a target moving at approximately the speed of light. 
 Specifically, the open a web browser part of it is.

 A virtualizer running on Plan 9 would waste far less time than implementing 
 enough Linux syscalls to run a Linux distro new enough to run any browser 
 newer than Opera 9.

That's a very interesting point. Implementing lguest on Plan 9 would
require something like 13 system calls. Far easier than doing the
near-400 system calls of linux correctly.

ron



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-15 Thread erik quanstrom
 That's a very interesting point. Implementing lguest on Plan 9 would
 require something like 13 system calls. Far easier than doing the
 near-400 system calls of linux correctly.

i believe there's at least 2 and they're working on 3 abi for each system call.
it's like FAR and HUGE pointers are back from the dead.

- erik



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-15 Thread Jens Staal
2011/9/16 ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com:
 On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis
 eeke...@fastmail.fm wrote:
 On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:41:29 -0400
 L N leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:

 The goal should be a Plan 9 distro that runs natively on AMD-64, and can
 open a web-browser.

 That goal is a target moving at approximately the speed of light. 
 Specifically, the open a web browser part of it is.

 A virtualizer running on Plan 9 would waste far less time than implementing 
 enough Linux syscalls to run a Linux distro new enough to run any browser 
 newer than Opera 9.

 That's a very interesting point. Implementing lguest on Plan 9 would
 require something like 13 system calls. Far easier than doing the
 near-400 system calls of linux correctly.

 ron



Just out of interest, has anyone made a cross compiler either for the
32-bit Plan9 or 64-bit Nix target?

I have been looking a bit into the possibility of packaging the old
GCC 3.0 as a cross compiler on Arch linux. At the moment my builds
fail miserably since the build assumes that you build on a Plan9 host
(hard links in the binutils build to i386-lucent-plan9-ar etc). A
newer version (4.6) would be cooler since it also supports the plan9
dialect of C. On the other hand, the cross compiler would just be a
neat way to build legacy stuff without having to worry about having
all the GNU tools on the target machine.

Alternatively - would a newlib approach be a better bet to get
binutils/gcc going? I have been trying to read up on it and to try to
locate the syscall information I need from plan9 libc. If anyone got
any pointers on how to do this, it would be appreciated :)

I am a total nooob on this though (unfortunately with very little
time, so my efforts are sporadic)

Ps.

I have an experimental PKGBUILD for nix on my machine. The basic idea
I got with that one is:
- static root at /opt/vx32/nix/root
- changes at /opt/vx32/nix/changes
- /usr/glenda moved to /home/glenda, user glenda added to system
(directory /opt/vx32/nix/usr removed)
- union mount /opt/nix/vx32/nix/root and /opt/nix/vx32/nix/changes at /mnt/nix
- mount /home at /mnt/nix/usr

It is not ready for public consumption yet however.
- One thing I wonder there about 9vx is - can you add a command line
argument to start a script in the plan9 that boots?
Right now building/packaging nix requires manual intervention in the
booted plan9 environment during packaging.
Also, it would be nice to have a firstrun part in the startup script
for a user so that the system executes /sys/lib/newuser.

This in combination with a cross compiler would turn playing with
Plan9 far easier and more fun :)



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-15 Thread L N
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis eeke...@fastmail.fmwrote:

 On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:41:29 -0400
 L N leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:

  The goal should be a Plan 9 distro that runs natively on AMD-64, and
 can
  open a web-browser.

 That goal is a target moving at approximately the speed of light.
 Specifically, the open a web browser part of it is.

 A virtualizer running on Plan 9 would waste far less time than implementing
 enough Linux syscalls to run a Linux distro new enough to run any browser
 newer than Opera 9.


Is running Opera on Plan 9 an option?

Also, I don't know how to get abaco running.

Downloaded the tarball ...

http://rain.ifmo.ru/~olegfink/abaco-p9p.tgz

Unpacked it, ran mk.

Ran ./abaco.sh.

Got this far ...

./abaco.sh
./abaco.sh: 7: webfs: not found
./abaco.sh: 10: abaco.bin: not found

Apologies for being helpless.

 - Leonard


[9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread s s
Is there an html version of the nemo book?

http://lsub.org/who/nemo/9.pdf

Want to read it as white text on a black background.

 - Leonard


Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread Francisco J Ballesteros
IIRC there's a 9.txt.gz, not html, but raw text.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:43 PM, s s leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:
 Is there an html version of the nemo book?

 http://lsub.org/who/nemo/9.pdf

 Want to read it as white text on a black background.

  - Leonard





Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread Francisco J Ballesteros
Yes, http://lsub.org/who/nemo/9.txt.gz


On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros n...@lsub.org wrote:
 IIRC there's a 9.txt.gz, not html, but raw text.

 On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:43 PM, s s leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:
 Is there an html version of the nemo book?

 http://lsub.org/who/nemo/9.pdf

 Want to read it as white text on a black background.

  - Leonard






Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread s s
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros n...@lsub.orgwrote:

 Yes, http://lsub.org/who/nemo/9.txt.gz


Cheers.


Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread hiro
Or use xpdf -rv
Although I use it for exactly the opposite purpose.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 23:43, s s leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:
 Is there an html version of the nemo book?

 http://lsub.org/who/nemo/9.pdf

 Want to read it as white text on a black background.

  - Leonard





Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread s s
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros n...@lsub.orgwrote:

 Yes, http://lsub.org/who/nemo/9.txt.gz


Wow is that better.

Too bad there is no css for pdf.  (Or is there?)

Viewing the book now with Firefox/Stylish/Blackify.

http://userstyles.org/styles/2154/blackify

 - Leonard


Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread s s
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Or use xpdf -rv
 Although I use it for exactly the opposite purpose.


How come no one likes high-contrast-inverse themes?


Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread s s
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Or use xpdf -rv
 Although I use it for exactly the opposite purpose.


Somehow, plain text is much more enjoyable to read than pdf.


Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread John Floren
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:55 PM, s s leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Or use xpdf -rv
 Although I use it for exactly the opposite purpose.

 How come no one likes high-contrast-inverse themes?



Because we like our eyeballs. I think you're going to be pretty
disappointed with the Plan 9 UIs, if you get around to booting it.



John



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread L N
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:57 PM, John Floren j...@jfloren.net wrote:

 On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 2:55 PM, s s leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
 
  Or use xpdf -rv
  Although I use it for exactly the opposite purpose.
 
  How come no one likes high-contrast-inverse themes?
 
 

 Because we like our eyeballs. I think you're going to be pretty
 disappointed with the Plan 9 UIs, if you get around to booting it.



 John


Right now running Ubuntu, with openbox.

GTK theme is Wii-black.

Tried using wmii, but for some reason sound stopped working, so still using
openbox.

Downloaded p9p and go9p.

Afraid to commit to booting native Plan-9 until I'm sure I can get openbox,
firefox, and chromium-browser working on it.

 - Leonard


Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread ron minnich
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:13 PM, L N leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:

 Afraid to commit to booting native Plan-9 until I'm sure I can get openbox,
 firefox, and chromium-browser working on it.

ah, now I see :-)
http://www.clipartguide.com/_named_clipart_images/0511-0701-3117-1335_Skeleton_Behind_a_Business_Desk_clipart_image.jpg

ron



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread hiro
I want my monitor's brightness and color temperature to suit my
ambient light. I'm used to black text on white paper and I don't want
to see white squares behind black monitors.
Perhaps the only reason I bother is because I'm sitting in front of
pcs too long.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 23:55, s s leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:

 Or use xpdf -rv
 Although I use it for exactly the opposite purpose.

 How come no one likes high-contrast-inverse themes?





Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread L N
 ah, now I see :-)

 http://www.clipartguide.com/_named_clipart_images/0511-0701-3117-1335_Skeleton_Behind_a_Business_Desk_clipart_image.jpg

 ron


Maybe.

The web-browser really is a deal-breaker, though.

I really enjoyed reading about Plan 9, first at plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/,
and later at cat-v.org.

As much as I like the design of Plan 9, I also like surfing the web.

It would be nice to boot Plan 9 natively on AMD-64, type startx, and open a
browser.

Unfortunately, I'm not at a level where I can really contribute to getting
Plan 9 to that point.

I think the focus of the Plan 9 community should be just that.

The goal should be a Plan 9 distro that runs natively on AMD-64, and can
open a web-browser.

With the announcement of NIX, maybe we are already at that point?

http://doc.cat-v.org/bell_labs/good_bad_ugly/slides/28

 - Leonard


Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread John Floren
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:41 PM, L N leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:

 ah, now I see :-)

 http://www.clipartguide.com/_named_clipart_images/0511-0701-3117-1335_Skeleton_Behind_a_Business_Desk_clipart_image.jpg

 ron

 Maybe.

 The web-browser really is a deal-breaker, though.

 I really enjoyed reading about Plan 9, first at
 plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/, and later at cat-v.org.

 As much as I like the design of Plan 9, I also like surfing the web.

 It would be nice to boot Plan 9 natively on AMD-64, type startx, and open a
 browser.

 Unfortunately, I'm not at a level where I can really contribute to getting
 Plan 9 to that point.

 I think the focus of the Plan 9 community should be just that.

 The goal should be a Plan 9 distro that runs natively on AMD-64, and can
 open a web-browser.

 With the announcement of NIX, maybe we are already at that point?

 http://doc.cat-v.org/bell_labs/good_bad_ugly/slides/28

  - Leonard

 I think you have seriously misapprehended many things about Plan 9.
We don't have X. We are not Linux compatible, although there's a
rather decent Linux emulator. There is no GTK, no Qt, no Firefox, no
modern C++ compiler.

I think it's time for people to stop telling the Plan 9 community
what its goals should be, when these people haven't even booted Plan
9.

John



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread Francisco J Ballesteros
The point is that you can run multiple operating systems,
these days, even on the same machine at the same time.
There's no need to use the same one for everything.

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:54 AM, John Floren j...@jfloren.net wrote:
 On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:41 PM, L N leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:

 ah, now I see :-)

 http://www.clipartguide.com/_named_clipart_images/0511-0701-3117-1335_Skeleton_Behind_a_Business_Desk_clipart_image.jpg

 ron

 Maybe.

 The web-browser really is a deal-breaker, though.

 I really enjoyed reading about Plan 9, first at
 plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/, and later at cat-v.org.

 As much as I like the design of Plan 9, I also like surfing the web.

 It would be nice to boot Plan 9 natively on AMD-64, type startx, and open a
 browser.

 Unfortunately, I'm not at a level where I can really contribute to getting
 Plan 9 to that point.

 I think the focus of the Plan 9 community should be just that.

 The goal should be a Plan 9 distro that runs natively on AMD-64, and can
 open a web-browser.

 With the announcement of NIX, maybe we are already at that point?

 http://doc.cat-v.org/bell_labs/good_bad_ugly/slides/28

  - Leonard

  I think you have seriously misapprehended many things about Plan 9.
 We don't have X. We are not Linux compatible, although there's a
 rather decent Linux emulator. There is no GTK, no Qt, no Firefox, no
 modern C++ compiler.

 I think it's time for people to stop telling the Plan 9 community
 what its goals should be, when these people haven't even booted Plan
 9.

 John





Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread L N
  I think you have seriously misapprehended many things about Plan 9.


What am I misapprehending?


 We don't have X. We are not Linux compatible, although there's a
 rather decent Linux emulator. There is no GTK, no Qt, no Firefox, no
 modern C++ compiler.


I don't need X, Linux compatibility, GTK, Qt, Firefox, or C++.

I need an OS that runs a browser.

I was using startx in the figurative sense.



 I think it's time for people to stop telling the Plan 9 community
 what its goals should be,


Are my-two-cents worth a negative amount?


 when these people haven't even booted Plan
 9.


Why should I boot Plan 9, when I know I can't run a browser, and I already
have p9p?

John


 - Leonard


Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread Jeff Sickel

On Sep 14, 2011, at 5:17 PM, ron minnich wrote:

 On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:13 PM, L N leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Afraid to commit to booting native Plan-9 until I'm sure I can get openbox,
 firefox, and chromium-browser working on it.
 
 ah, now I see :-)
 http://www.clipartguide.com/_named_clipart_images/0511-0701-3117-1335_Skeleton_Behind_a_Business_Desk_clipart_image.jpg
 
 ron

Nice pic.  If I squint I can even see the remains of my soul being
sucked out just above the cobwebs like they were on a prior job.

-jas




Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread hiro
Plan 9 is an OS, p9p is less.
If all you need from Plan 9 is in p9p no need to boot Plan 9.
We have a browser, but not one with all the newest craze (no html5,
js, flash, gl).



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread ron minnich
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, L N leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:

 Why should I boot Plan 9, when I know I can't run a browser, and I already
 have p9p?

um, precisely. You should not. So use p9p. Let's get back to trying to
figure out where the Ted Stevens quote is in the NIX source.

thanks

ron



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread ron minnich
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:30 PM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Plan 9 is an OS, p9p is less.
 If all you need from Plan 9 is in p9p no need to boot Plan 9.
 We have a browser, but not one with all the newest craze (no html5,
 js, flash, gl).



Although for my money abaco is still really neat ...

ron



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread Nick LaForge
Since you're on Ubuntu, why don't you start learning the ropes of the
Plan 9 programming environment by compiling/running 9vx on Ubuntu and
then hitting the papers?  That way you can easily continue to use
Mozilla and invest minimal time before being able to actually get
something out of Plan 9 (you'll need to write some file servers as
well as thoroughly appreciate the concurrency model).

You'll find 9vx is also a great utility for more effectively using Linux.

Inside 9vx, you should also see 'man 1 abaco' and decide if you really
need Mozilla.

Nick

On 9/14/11, L N leonardne...@gmail.com wrote:
  I think you have seriously misapprehended many things about Plan 9.


 What am I misapprehending?


 We don't have X. We are not Linux compatible, although there's a
 rather decent Linux emulator. There is no GTK, no Qt, no Firefox, no
 modern C++ compiler.


 I don't need X, Linux compatibility, GTK, Qt, Firefox, or C++.

 I need an OS that runs a browser.

 I was using startx in the figurative sense.



 I think it's time for people to stop telling the Plan 9 community
 what its goals should be,


 Are my-two-cents worth a negative amount?


 when these people haven't even booted Plan
 9.


 Why should I boot Plan 9, when I know I can't run a browser, and I already
 have p9p?

 John


  - Leonard




Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread Akshat Kumar
abaco is free.

:-)

 Although for my money abaco is still really neat ...

 ron



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread hiro
invest some time then.

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 01:43, Akshat Kumar aku...@mail.nanosouffle.net wrote:
 abaco is free.

 :-)

 Although for my money abaco is still really neat ...

 ron





Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread Rob Pike
this is still my favorite:
http://gi52.photobucket.com/groups/g5/6DUVRHDUAT/typing.gif

-rob



Re: [9fans] Nemo book

2011-09-14 Thread L N
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:33 PM, ron minnich rminn...@gmail.com wrote:



 Although for my money abaco is still really neat ...

 ron


I wonder if I can get abaco to display pages with a high-contrast-inverse
theme.  :]

 - Leonard


[9fans] nemo book

2009-08-17 Thread Benjamin Huntsman
Does anyone here know if it's possible to obtain printed
copies of nemo's book if you live in the United States?

Dykinson's website doesn't seem to offer overseas
shipping...

Thanks in advance!

-Ben



Re: [9fans] nemo book

2009-08-17 Thread John Floren
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Benjamin
Huntsmanbhunts...@mail2.cu-portland.edu wrote:
 Does anyone here know if it's possible to obtain printed
 copies of nemo's book if you live in the United States?

 Dykinson's website doesn't seem to offer overseas
 shipping...

 Thanks in advance!

 -Ben


I've looked at the cost for printing Nemo's book on lulu.com; if you
get it in black and white it should be about $25 for one copy. I'd be
interested in getting one myself... it's a great reference for Plan 9
programming.


John
-- 
Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing -- Rob Pike



Re: [9fans] nemo book

2009-08-17 Thread Steve Simon
 Does anyone here know if it's possible to obtain printed
 copies of nemo's book if you live in the United States?

I'am intrigued, you have a weblink to where I could buy a printed copy
(in europe)?

I thought sites like lulu only allowed the author to offer the document for
publication, not that you can chose an arbitary PDF and ask for it to be
printed and bound - unless nemo has done this and I missed the link?

I would also be interested a printed and bound copy of the 3rd edition
kernel source and commentry...

-Steve



Re: [9fans] nemo book

2009-08-17 Thread Benjamin Huntsman
I'am intrigued, you have a weblink to where I could buy a printed copy
(in europe)?

I'm not sure you can order it online, but here is the link:

http://www.dykinson.com/book--Notes_on_the_plan_9tm_3rd_edition_kernel_source--232471.html
winmail.dat

Re: [9fans] nemo book

2009-08-17 Thread John Floren
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Benjamin
Huntsmanbhunts...@mail2.cu-portland.edu wrote:
I'am intrigued, you have a weblink to where I could buy a printed copy
(in europe)?

 I'm not sure you can order it online, but here is the link:

 http://www.dykinson.com/book--Notes_on_the_plan_9tm_3rd_edition_kernel_source--232471.html


Oh, different book... I was thinking of the 'Introduction to OS
Abstractions Using Plan 9


John
-- 
Object-oriented design is the roman numerals of computing -- Rob Pike