Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC
Yes friends please do join me. As I will be challenging this notification very soon. My one of the remedies claimed will be to provide question paper in accessible format with screenreader if demanded in soft copy and compensatory time for 20 minutes per hour. And of course to provide minimum 3% quota on total advertised vacancies. The notification is clearly in contradiction of last October 8th pronouncement of hon'ble Supreme Court. NFB, can u help us please once again? On 5/31/14, avinash shahi shahi88avin...@gmail.com wrote: There are several paragraphs in the notification which put blind candidates at the disadvantage, Serious legal advocacy coupled with mass protest at DOPT Office recquired. Who will take the lead? of Course aspiring candidates should come in front... Totally blind which is referred in the notification as (B), can be inducted only in Indian administrative service, Railways and in Foreign service. To my astonishment, He/she/third gender can't go in to Indian corporate legal service. Thanks to identification of posts (perogative of Department of Personnel and Training), continues to exclude blind from being appointed in many pristigious services. Let me highlight few serious anomalies in the Notification 1) Out of 1291 expected posts Only 26 will be reserved forPH out of which 1 will be given to B (blind p 1). 2) Providing scribe to a blind candidate or allowing him/ her to bring his/ her own scribe, suitable modification has been made in the online application programme to get the information at the time of the initial online application itself, and not get it later as per the existing practice p 3). 3) Then I visited UPSC's website to ascertain the hidden intention of UPSC, I Loged in and pretended to apply for the post to obtain scribe performa for the blind, and read what it demands? Educational qualification of scribe as brought by the candidate should not be higher than graduation. Can somebody show them Office Memoorandum issued by MSJE in Feb 2013, please? 4) As far as Main exams are concerned, Candidates must write the papers in their own hand. In no circumstances, will they be allowed the help of a scribe to write the answers for them. However, blind candidates will be allowed to write the examination with the help of a scribe.Blind candidates will also be allowed an extra time of thirty minutes at each paper @ ten minutes per hour. (ii) An extra time of twenty minutes per hour shall be permitted for the candidates with locomotor disability and cerebral palsy where dominant (writing) extremity is affected to the extent of slowing the performance of function (minimum of 40% impairment) in the Civil Services (Main) Examination only. However, no scribe shall be permitted to such candidates. p 5. Hope above highlighted anomalies help candidates to fight for their rights before it is too late. All the best On 5/31/14, Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com wrote: I went to CCPD through Subhash sir, the notice from CCPD office was served to Registrar General, but no outcome. This time we got only permission to use our own scribe, barring to educational qualification, and extra time upto 20 minutes each hour. There was no much time left to take recourse of judicial machinery. Fortunately if I am promoted to the next stage of the exam, definitly I will file a petition to resolve this issue for greater end. So far as the extra time in UPSC is concern, they haven't change anything. Please refer to para (iv) of the notification: Each paper will be of two hours duration. Blind candidates will however, be allowed an extra time of twenty minutes for each paper. UPSC is really a unruly hourse! Isn't it? Sorry. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: 1. Good so in the case of Judicial services exam one problem i.e. additional time is now over. Please email me this order. 2. What about your remaining 3 issues on the Judicial services exam? Did you go to CCPD and if so where are the orders? 3. I was actually asking about the additional time for the UPSC exams this year. Is it mentioned in this notification released today. Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled. accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 3:10 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC U r talking about Delhi Judicial services exam? If yes, they have given 50 minutes extra on 2 and half hour exam. It mean 20 minutes each hour. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: what happened about the additional time? Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message
Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC
Avinash, I may need your help in the next few days while I draft thePetition. You have my mobile no. Please sms me yours. I may have found some Petitioners in Maharashtra. Now we have no time to lose. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of avinash shahi Sent: 31 May 2014 19:11 To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled. Subject: Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC There are several paragraphs in the notification which put blind candidates at the disadvantage, Serious legal advocacy coupled with mass protest at DOPT Office recquired. Who will take the lead? of Course aspiring candidates should come in front... Totally blind which is referred in the notification as (B), can be inducted only in Indian administrative service, Railways and in Foreign service. To my astonishment, He/she/third gender can't go in to Indian corporate legal service. Thanks to identification of posts (perogative of Department of Personnel and Training), continues to exclude blind from being appointed in many pristigious services. Let me highlight few serious anomalies in the Notification 1) Out of 1291 expected posts Only 26 will be reserved forPH out of which 1 will be given to B (blind p 1). 2) Providing scribe to a blind candidate or allowing him/ her to bring his/ her own scribe, suitable modification has been made in the online application programme to get the information at the time of the initial online application itself, and not get it later as per the existing practice p 3). 3) Then I visited UPSC's website to ascertain the hidden intention of UPSC, I Loged in and pretended to apply for the post to obtain scribe performa for the blind, and read what it demands? Educational qualification of scribe as brought by the candidate should not be higher than graduation. Can somebody show them Office Memoorandum issued by MSJE in Feb 2013, please? 4) As far as Main exams are concerned, Candidates must write the papers in their own hand. In no circumstances, will they be allowed the help of a scribe to write the answers for them. However, blind candidates will be allowed to write the examination with the help of a scribe.Blind candidates will also be allowed an extra time of thirty minutes at each paper @ ten minutes per hour. (ii) An extra time of twenty minutes per hour shall be permitted for the candidates with locomotor disability and cerebral palsy where dominant (writing) extremity is affected to the extent of slowing the performance of function (minimum of 40% impairment) in the Civil Services (Main) Examination only. However, no scribe shall be permitted to such candidates. p 5. Hope above highlighted anomalies help candidates to fight for their rights before it is too late. All the best On 5/31/14, Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com wrote: I went to CCPD through Subhash sir, the notice from CCPD office was served to Registrar General, but no outcome. This time we got only permission to use our own scribe, barring to educational qualification, and extra time upto 20 minutes each hour. There was no much time left to take recourse of judicial machinery. Fortunately if I am promoted to the next stage of the exam, definitly I will file a petition to resolve this issue for greater end. So far as the extra time in UPSC is concern, they haven't change anything. Please refer to para (iv) of the notification: Each paper will be of two hours duration. Blind candidates will however, be allowed an extra time of twenty minutes for each paper. UPSC is really a unruly hourse! Isn't it? Sorry. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: 1. Good so in the case of Judicial services exam one problem i.e. additional time is now over. Please email me this order. 2. What about your remaining 3 issues on the Judicial services exam? Did you go to CCPD and if so where are the orders? 3. I was actually asking about the additional time for the UPSC exams this year. Is it mentioned in this notification released today. Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled. accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 3:10 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC U r talking about Delhi Judicial services exam? If yes, they have given 50 minutes extra on 2 and half hour exam. It mean 20 minutes each hour. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: what happened about the additional time? Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: accessindia accessindia
Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC
SMS sent. On 6/1/14, KanchanPamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: Avinash, I may need your help in the next few days while I draft thePetition. You have my mobile no. Please sms me yours. I may have found some Petitioners in Maharashtra. Now we have no time to lose. Kanchan -Original Message- From: AccessIndia [mailto:accessindia-boun...@accessindia.org.in] On Behalf Of avinash shahi Sent: 31 May 2014 19:11 To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerning the disabled. Subject: Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC There are several paragraphs in the notification which put blind candidates at the disadvantage, Serious legal advocacy coupled with mass protest at DOPT Office recquired. Who will take the lead? of Course aspiring candidates should come in front... Totally blind which is referred in the notification as (B), can be inducted only in Indian administrative service, Railways and in Foreign service. To my astonishment, He/she/third gender can't go in to Indian corporate legal service. Thanks to identification of posts (perogative of Department of Personnel and Training), continues to exclude blind from being appointed in many pristigious services. Let me highlight few serious anomalies in the Notification 1) Out of 1291 expected posts Only 26 will be reserved forPH out of which 1 will be given to B (blind p 1). 2) Providing scribe to a blind candidate or allowing him/ her to bring his/ her own scribe, suitable modification has been made in the online application programme to get the information at the time of the initial online application itself, and not get it later as per the existing practice p 3). 3) Then I visited UPSC's website to ascertain the hidden intention of UPSC, I Loged in and pretended to apply for the post to obtain scribe performa for the blind, and read what it demands? Educational qualification of scribe as brought by the candidate should not be higher than graduation. Can somebody show them Office Memoorandum issued by MSJE in Feb 2013, please? 4) As far as Main exams are concerned, Candidates must write the papers in their own hand. In no circumstances, will they be allowed the help of a scribe to write the answers for them. However, blind candidates will be allowed to write the examination with the help of a scribe.Blind candidates will also be allowed an extra time of thirty minutes at each paper @ ten minutes per hour. (ii) An extra time of twenty minutes per hour shall be permitted for the candidates with locomotor disability and cerebral palsy where dominant (writing) extremity is affected to the extent of slowing the performance of function (minimum of 40% impairment) in the Civil Services (Main) Examination only. However, no scribe shall be permitted to such candidates. p 5. Hope above highlighted anomalies help candidates to fight for their rights before it is too late. All the best On 5/31/14, Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com wrote: I went to CCPD through Subhash sir, the notice from CCPD office was served to Registrar General, but no outcome. This time we got only permission to use our own scribe, barring to educational qualification, and extra time upto 20 minutes each hour. There was no much time left to take recourse of judicial machinery. Fortunately if I am promoted to the next stage of the exam, definitly I will file a petition to resolve this issue for greater end. So far as the extra time in UPSC is concern, they haven't change anything. Please refer to para (iv) of the notification: Each paper will be of two hours duration. Blind candidates will however, be allowed an extra time of twenty minutes for each paper. UPSC is really a unruly hourse! Isn't it? Sorry. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: 1. Good so in the case of Judicial services exam one problem i.e. additional time is now over. Please email me this order. 2. What about your remaining 3 issues on the Judicial services exam? Did you go to CCPD and if so where are the orders? 3. I was actually asking about the additional time for the UPSC exams this year. Is it mentioned in this notification released today. Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled. accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 3:10 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC U r talking about Delhi Judicial services exam? If yes, they have given 50 minutes extra on 2 and half hour exam. It mean 20 minutes each hour. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: what happened about the additional time? Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400
Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC
what happened about the additional time? Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: accessindia accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 1:15 PM Subject: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC Recently UPSC published advertisement for civil services 2014. In the aftermath of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision of providing not less than 3% reservation on total vacancies, and not 3% of merely identified posts. Still UPSC has kept reserved only 2 seats for Bl-LV out of 1291? Minimum 39 seats would have been kept reserved for PWD, out of which minimum 13 seats should have been for BL-LV. Relevant portion from advertisement published today (31 May 2014). The number of vacancies to be filled on the result of the examination is expected to be approximately 1291 which includes 26 vacancies reserved for P.H. Category, i.e. 12 vacancies for LDCP, 2 Vacancies for B/LV and 12 Vacancies for H.I. The final number of vacancies may undergo change after getting firm number of vacancies from Cadre Controlling Authorities. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel Ph.D Candidate at Jawaharlal Nehru University Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 09211400800 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC
U r talking about Delhi Judicial services exam? If yes, they have given 50 minutes extra on 2 and half hour exam. It mean 20 minutes each hour. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: what happened about the additional time? Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: accessindia accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 1:15 PM Subject: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC Recently UPSC published advertisement for civil services 2014. In the aftermath of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision of providing not less than 3% reservation on total vacancies, and not 3% of merely identified posts. Still UPSC has kept reserved only 2 seats for Bl-LV out of 1291? Minimum 39 seats would have been kept reserved for PWD, out of which minimum 13 seats should have been for BL-LV. Relevant portion from advertisement published today (31 May 2014). The number of vacancies to be filled on the result of the examination is expected to be approximately 1291 which includes 26 vacancies reserved for P.H. Category, i.e. 12 vacancies for LDCP, 2 Vacancies for B/LV and 12 Vacancies for H.I. The final number of vacancies may undergo change after getting firm number of vacancies from Cadre Controlling Authorities. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel Ph.D Candidate at Jawaharlal Nehru University Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 09211400800 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel Ph.D Candidate at Jawaharlal Nehru University Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 09211400800 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC
Can anybody tell me if he is going to challenge this advertisement of UPSC? Though I haven't read full advertisement, it was quick look on distribution of vacancies. I will study it tomorrow then I will decide to challenge this notification. Its so discouraging, isn't it? On 5/31/14, Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com wrote: U r talking about Delhi Judicial services exam? If yes, they have given 50 minutes extra on 2 and half hour exam. It mean 20 minutes each hour. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: what happened about the additional time? Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: accessindia accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 1:15 PM Subject: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC Recently UPSC published advertisement for civil services 2014. In the aftermath of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision of providing not less than 3% reservation on total vacancies, and not 3% of merely identified posts. Still UPSC has kept reserved only 2 seats for Bl-LV out of 1291? Minimum 39 seats would have been kept reserved for PWD, out of which minimum 13 seats should have been for BL-LV. Relevant portion from advertisement published today (31 May 2014). The number of vacancies to be filled on the result of the examination is expected to be approximately 1291 which includes 26 vacancies reserved for P.H. Category, i.e. 12 vacancies for LDCP, 2 Vacancies for B/LV and 12 Vacancies for H.I. The final number of vacancies may undergo change after getting firm number of vacancies from Cadre Controlling Authorities. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel Ph.D Candidate at Jawaharlal Nehru University Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 09211400800 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel Ph.D Candidate at Jawaharlal Nehru University Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 09211400800 -- Mohib Anwar Rafel Ph.D Candidate at Jawaharlal Nehru University Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 09211400800 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list..
Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC
1. Good so in the case of Judicial services exam one problem i.e. additional time is now over. Please email me this order. 2. What about your remaining 3 issues on the Judicial services exam? Did you go to CCPD and if so where are the orders? 3. I was actually asking about the additional time for the UPSC exams this year. Is it mentioned in this notification released today. Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled. accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 3:10 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC U r talking about Delhi Judicial services exam? If yes, they have given 50 minutes extra on 2 and half hour exam. It mean 20 minutes each hour. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: what happened about the additional time? Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: accessindia accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 1:15 PM Subject: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC Recently UPSC published advertisement for civil services 2014. In the aftermath of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision of providing not less than 3% reservation on total vacancies, and not 3% of merely identified posts. Still UPSC has kept reserved only 2 seats for Bl-LV out of 1291? Minimum 39 seats would have been kept reserved for PWD, out of which minimum 13 seats should have been for BL-LV. Relevant portion from advertisement published today (31 May 2014). The number of vacancies to be filled on the result of the examination is expected to be approximately 1291 which includes 26 vacancies reserved for P.H. Category, i.e. 12 vacancies for LDCP, 2 Vacancies for B/LV and 12 Vacancies for H.I. The final number of vacancies may undergo change after getting firm number of vacancies from Cadre Controlling Authorities. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel Ph.D Candidate at Jawaharlal Nehru University Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 09211400800 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel Ph.D Candidate at Jawaharlal Nehru University Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 09211400800 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones
Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC
I went to CCPD through Subhash sir, the notice from CCPD office was served to Registrar General, but no outcome. This time we got only permission to use our own scribe, barring to educational qualification, and extra time upto 20 minutes each hour. There was no much time left to take recourse of judicial machinery. Fortunately if I am promoted to the next stage of the exam, definitly I will file a petition to resolve this issue for greater end. So far as the extra time in UPSC is concern, they haven't change anything. Please refer to para (iv) of the notification: Each paper will be of two hours duration. Blind candidates will however, be allowed an extra time of twenty minutes for each paper. UPSC is really a unruly hourse! Isn't it? Sorry. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: 1. Good so in the case of Judicial services exam one problem i.e. additional time is now over. Please email me this order. 2. What about your remaining 3 issues on the Judicial services exam? Did you go to CCPD and if so where are the orders? 3. I was actually asking about the additional time for the UPSC exams this year. Is it mentioned in this notification released today. Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled. accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 3:10 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC U r talking about Delhi Judicial services exam? If yes, they have given 50 minutes extra on 2 and half hour exam. It mean 20 minutes each hour. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: what happened about the additional time? Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: accessindia accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 1:15 PM Subject: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC Recently UPSC published advertisement for civil services 2014. In the aftermath of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision of providing not less than 3% reservation on total vacancies, and not 3% of merely identified posts. Still UPSC has kept reserved only 2 seats for Bl-LV out of 1291? Minimum 39 seats would have been kept reserved for PWD, out of which minimum 13 seats should have been for BL-LV. Relevant portion from advertisement published today (31 May 2014). The number of vacancies to be filled on the result of the examination is expected to be approximately 1291 which includes 26 vacancies reserved for P.H. Category, i.e. 12 vacancies for LDCP, 2 Vacancies for B/LV and 12 Vacancies for H.I. The final number of vacancies may undergo change after getting firm number of vacancies from Cadre Controlling Authorities. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel Ph.D Candidate at Jawaharlal Nehru University Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 09211400800 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list for discussing accessibility of mobile phones / Tabs on: http://mail.accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/mobile.accessindia_accessindia.org.in Search for old postings at: http://www.mail-archive.com/accessindia@accessindia.org.in/ To unsubscribe send a message to accessindia-requ...@accessindia.org.in with the subject unsubscribe. To change your subscription to digest mode or make any other changes, please visit the list home page at http://accessindia.org.in/mailman/listinfo/accessindia_accessindia.org.in Disclaimer: 1. Contents of the mails, factual, or otherwise, reflect the thinking of the person sending the mail and AI in no way relates itself to its veracity; 2. AI cannot be held liable for any commission/omission based on the mails sent through this mailing list.. -- Mohib Anwar Rafel Ph.D Candidate at Jawaharlal Nehru University Delhi Phone: 09811767506, 09211400800 Register at the dedicated AccessIndia list
Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC
There are several paragraphs in the notification which put blind candidates at the disadvantage, Serious legal advocacy coupled with mass protest at DOPT Office recquired. Who will take the lead? of Course aspiring candidates should come in front... Totally blind which is referred in the notification as (B), can be inducted only in Indian administrative service, Railways and in Foreign service. To my astonishment, He/she/third gender can't go in to Indian corporate legal service. Thanks to identification of posts (perogative of Department of Personnel and Training), continues to exclude blind from being appointed in many pristigious services. Let me highlight few serious anomalies in the Notification 1) Out of 1291 expected posts Only 26 will be reserved forPH out of which 1 will be given to B (blind p 1). 2) Providing scribe to a blind candidate or allowing him/ her to bring his/ her own scribe, suitable modification has been made in the online application programme to get the information at the time of the initial online application itself, and not get it later as per the existing practice p 3). 3) Then I visited UPSC's website to ascertain the hidden intention of UPSC, I Loged in and pretended to apply for the post to obtain scribe performa for the blind, and read what it demands? Educational qualification of scribe as brought by the candidate should not be higher than graduation. Can somebody show them Office Memoorandum issued by MSJE in Feb 2013, please? 4) As far as Main exams are concerned, Candidates must write the papers in their own hand. In no circumstances, will they be allowed the help of a scribe to write the answers for them. However, blind candidates will be allowed to write the examination with the help of a scribe.Blind candidates will also be allowed an extra time of thirty minutes at each paper @ ten minutes per hour. (ii) An extra time of twenty minutes per hour shall be permitted for the candidates with locomotor disability and cerebral palsy where dominant (writing) extremity is affected to the extent of slowing the performance of function (minimum of 40% impairment) in the Civil Services (Main) Examination only. However, no scribe shall be permitted to such candidates. p 5. Hope above highlighted anomalies help candidates to fight for their rights before it is too late. All the best On 5/31/14, Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com wrote: I went to CCPD through Subhash sir, the notice from CCPD office was served to Registrar General, but no outcome. This time we got only permission to use our own scribe, barring to educational qualification, and extra time upto 20 minutes each hour. There was no much time left to take recourse of judicial machinery. Fortunately if I am promoted to the next stage of the exam, definitly I will file a petition to resolve this issue for greater end. So far as the extra time in UPSC is concern, they haven't change anything. Please refer to para (iv) of the notification: Each paper will be of two hours duration. Blind candidates will however, be allowed an extra time of twenty minutes for each paper. UPSC is really a unruly hourse! Isn't it? Sorry. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: 1. Good so in the case of Judicial services exam one problem i.e. additional time is now over. Please email me this order. 2. What about your remaining 3 issues on the Judicial services exam? Did you go to CCPD and if so where are the orders? 3. I was actually asking about the additional time for the UPSC exams this year. Is it mentioned in this notification released today. Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: AccessIndia: a list for discussing accessibility and issues concerningthe disabled. accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 3:10 PM Subject: Re: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC U r talking about Delhi Judicial services exam? If yes, they have given 50 minutes extra on 2 and half hour exam. It mean 20 minutes each hour. On 5/31/14, Kanchan Pamnani kanchanpamn...@gmail.com wrote: what happened about the additional time? Kanchan Pamnani Advocate Solicitor 9, Suleman Chambers, Battery Street, Colaba, Mumbai - 400 039. - Original Message - From: Mohib Anwar Rafel mohibra...@gmail.com To: accessindia accessindia@accessindia.org.in Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 1:15 PM Subject: [AI] Why such discrimination by UPSC Recently UPSC published advertisement for civil services 2014. In the aftermath of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision of providing not less than 3% reservation on total vacancies, and not 3% of merely identified posts. Still UPSC has kept reserved only 2 seats for Bl-LV out of 1291? Minimum 39 seats would have been kept reserved for PWD, out of which minimum 13 seats should have been for BL-LV
