Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Anarchist Anarchy
2009/6/8 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com: On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/7 Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com: In that case, I will gladly do the following: I intend to, with support, initiate an election for the office of Anarchist. -- -Tiger Since this had already been done, I withdraw this intent. Inominate c-walker for Anarchist. -- -Tiger I nominate myself as Anarchist. Tiger, also note that will automatically be a candidate for the election unless you explicitly deny your implicit nomination. I know, and I still consent unless it'll stand between me and one other candidate. -- -Tiger
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Anarchist Anarchy
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Jonatan Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/7 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: The following proposal constitutes the Anarchists weekly duties. Anarchist Anarchy AI=1, II=0 (( Repeal Rule 2216 (The repeal-o-matic) )) This message was sent Fri 6 May These duties were last fulfilled Sun 31 May -- -Tiger Seriously? No, I'm just out of ideas at the moment. Sorry about recently (the weird judgment, the late judgment, this proposal), I feel like a really bad player and have no real excuse for it. I'll stick to anarchist as long as you let me. Even if it's probably just me not coming up with anything good, I like to view the fact that the Anarchy proposals fail as an indication that the ruleset doesn't have any unnecessary rules - I can't really improve it just by repealing parts of it. -- -Tiger If you're tired of the position, I'll gladly take it. I think a lot can be done with it and it doesn't deserve to go. The position is needed precisely because the ruleset is so stable. By removing pieces of it, the Anarchist is really helping it grow. For example, if a Note Anarchy of some sort was voted in, it might jumpstart the long talked about transition to Cards or maybe some other, as yet unknown form of currency. With the adoption of the recent amendment to the rule defining it, the Anarchist is quite possibly the only truly creative office in the game and I would hate to see it go.
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Anarchist Anarchy
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Paul VanKoughnett allisp...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Jonatan Kilhamnjonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/7 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: The following proposal constitutes the Anarchists weekly duties. Anarchist Anarchy AI=1, II=0 (( Repeal Rule 2216 (The repeal-o-matic) )) This message was sent Fri 6 May These duties were last fulfilled Sun 31 May -- -Tiger Seriously? No, I'm just out of ideas at the moment. Sorry about recently (the weird judgment, the late judgment, this proposal), I feel like a really bad player and have no real excuse for it. I'll stick to anarchist as long as you let me. Even if it's probably just me not coming up with anything good, I like to view the fact that the Anarchy proposals fail as an indication that the ruleset doesn't have any unnecessary rules - I can't really improve it just by repealing parts of it. -- -Tiger If you're tired of the position, I'll gladly take it. I think a lot can be done with it and it doesn't deserve to go. The position is needed precisely because the ruleset is so stable. By removing pieces of it, the Anarchist is really helping it grow. For example, if a Note Anarchy of some sort was voted in, it might jumpstart the long talked about transition to Cards or maybe some other, as yet unknown form of currency. With the adoption of the recent amendment to the rule defining it, the Anarchist is quite possibly the only truly creative office in the game and I would hate to see it go. I completely agree, and would also be interested in the office. I'm also inspired to think up some creative offices. -- C-walker, who clearly intends this message to be public.
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Anarchist Anarchy
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Taraltar...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Paul VanKoughnettallisp...@gmail.com wrote: If you're tired of the position, I'll gladly take it. I intend, with support, to initiate an election for Anarchist. -- Taral tar...@gmail.com Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you. -- Unknown I support and do so. Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK
Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Anarchist Anarchy
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Taraltar...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Kyle Marek-Spartzzeckal...@gmail.com wrote: I support and do so. I nominate allispaul for Anarchist. -- Taral tar...@gmail.com Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you. -- Unknown I accept. --allispaul
DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Anarchist Anarchy
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.comwrote: The following proposal constitutes the Anarchists weekly duties. Anarchist Anarchy AI=1, II=0 (( Repeal Rule 2216 (The repeal-o-matic) )) This message was sent Fri 6 May These duties were last fulfilled Sun 31 May -- -Tiger Seriously?
Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Anarchist] Anarchist Anarchy
2009/6/7 Aaron Goldfein aarongoldf...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jonatan Kilhamn jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com wrote: The following proposal constitutes the Anarchists weekly duties. Anarchist Anarchy AI=1, II=0 (( Repeal Rule 2216 (The repeal-o-matic) )) This message was sent Fri 6 May These duties were last fulfilled Sun 31 May -- -Tiger Seriously? No, I'm just out of ideas at the moment. Sorry about recently (the weird judgment, the late judgment, this proposal), I feel like a really bad player and have no real excuse for it. I'll stick to anarchist as long as you let me. Even if it's probably just me not coming up with anything good, I like to view the fact that the Anarchy proposals fail as an indication that the ruleset doesn't have any unnecessary rules - I can't really improve it just by repealing parts of it. -- -Tiger
