Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette - 22 Jul 2022

[Jason Cobb via agora-discussion]

On 7/24/22 18:49, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote:
> Pseudo-coe: I think this is missing the Cfj called by snail with the
> subject line [Proposal?].  If so and it’s not taken I favor that one. -G.
>

Acknowledged and assigned, thank you.

-- 
Jason Cobb

Arbitor, Assessor, Rulekeepor, S​tonemason

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion]

On 2/21/2021 2:45 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>> DEADLINES (details below)
>> ---
>> [CFJ 3899 is being handled by the referee, but will be added to the CotC
>> database once closed.  Falsifian's judgment is due 11 Feb 2021 07:15:03]
> 
> I think it's due 24 Feb. It was assigned Feb 10 and I filed a motion to
> extend.
> 

Oh lol, that's what I get for making manual adjustments, I adjusted the
time for timezone in the wrong direction, and didn't add 2 weeks to the
date.  Correct should be: 24 Feb 2021 15:15:03 UTC.

-G.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Aris Merchant via agora-discussion]

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 6:16 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
 wrote:
>
>
> On 6/19/2020 6:06 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I always seem to get the least CFJs :(
>
> Hmmm... I think I've rotated pretty equally but maybe I'm wrong.  I
> noticed a couple weeks ago I had to skip you when you were on top (just
> for one set of cfjs) because most of the cases were called by you or you
> had a strong self-interest in or something.  But that was the only time
> I've noticed a skip there.  You're on the top of the list now anyway.
>
> I have a bunch of informal heuristics for assigning cases (not just
> popping off the top) that I'm happy to detail for anyone if they care.

I'd love to hear them, when you have time.

-Aris

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Rebecca via agora-discussion]

yeah im probably just mad because the number of CFJs called worked out to
give CFJs throughout the rotation except to myself, just luck on that one
(and i do call plenty of CFJs)

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 11:16 AM Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:

>
> On 6/19/2020 6:06 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I always seem to get the least CFJs :(
>
> Hmmm... I think I've rotated pretty equally but maybe I'm wrong.  I
> noticed a couple weeks ago I had to skip you when you were on top (just
> for one set of cfjs) because most of the cases were called by you or you
> had a strong self-interest in or something.  But that was the only time
> I've noticed a skip there.  You're on the top of the list now anyway.
>
> I have a bunch of informal heuristics for assigning cases (not just
> popping off the top) that I'm happy to detail for anyone if they care.
>


-- 
>From R. Lee

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion]

On 6/19/2020 6:06 PM, Rebecca via agora-discussion wrote:
> I always seem to get the least CFJs :(

Hmmm... I think I've rotated pretty equally but maybe I'm wrong.  I
noticed a couple weeks ago I had to skip you when you were on top (just
for one set of cfjs) because most of the cases were called by you or you
had a strong self-interest in or something.  But that was the only time
I've noticed a skip there.  You're on the top of the list now anyway.

I have a bunch of informal heuristics for assigning cases (not just
popping off the top) that I'm happy to detail for anyone if they care.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion]

Oh, my bad—your reply put the thread on top of my inbox and I assumed both 
messages were recent.

Gaelan

> On Feb 14, 2020, at 12:10 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business 
>  wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:02 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion
>  wrote:
>> 
>> CoE: I judged this one at 
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg35645.html 
>> .
>> 
>> I’m forwarding this to G., because I haven’t received replies to several of 
>> my recent messages and I’m worried they’re ending up in /dev/null.
>> 
>> Gaelan
>> 
>>> On Feb 9, 2020, at 12:58 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 3806 Assigned to Gaelan [Due Sun 16 Feb 2020 08:54:29]
>>>https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/?3806 
>>> 
>>>In the attached message, I submitted a public petition to the
>>>ADoP, as described by Rule 2143.
>> 
> 
> Denied -  the report in question was published  Feb 9, 08:58 UTC and
> your judgement was published a bit later, on Feb 9, 20:55 UTC.  So the
> report was accurate at the time.  I did receive that judgement message
> and it will be reflected in the next Gazette.
> 
> -G.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette (v1)

[Reuben Staley]

I'm sorry, but this week has been the busiest and most tiring I've had in
quite a while. I will deliver judgements for all the cases I'm currently
assigned to in a few hours.

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019, 12:48 Kerim Aydin 
> Trigon,
>
> Are you actually judging stuff?  I know you stepped away from a couple
> cases
> and timed-out on others, and a couple of these still on your docket are
> looking time-sensitive...
>
> -G.
>
> On 2/17/2019 8:24 AM, D. Margaux wrote:
> > Work and life have both been busy this week, and I unfortunately haven't
> had time to update the context/arguements/evidence section below.  Very
> sorry. I hope to have time to update it in a revised version at some point
> this week.
> >
> > I publish this report:
> >
> > COURT GAZETTE (Arbitor's weekly report)
> >
> > Date of last report:07 Feb 2019
> > Date of this report:17 Feb 2019
> > Version of this report: 1
> >
> > Disclaimer:  Informational only. No actions are contained in this
> report. Information in this report is not self-ratifying. The
> context/arguements/evidence section is in need of updating, and will
> hopefully be updated in a forthcoming revised version.
> >
> >
> > Open cases (CFJs)
> > -
> >
> > 3701 called 01 February 2019 by G., assigned 03 February 2019 to Trigon,
> reassigned 17 February 2019 to D. Margaux: "If the definition of quanging a
> player had not been explicitly included in the message in evidence, the
> attempt to transfer currencies on behalf of Tenhigitsune would have failed."
> >
> > 3704 called 05 February 2019 by D. Margaux, assigned 07 February 2019 to
> Murphy, Murphy recused 10 February 2019, reassigned to Trigon 10 February
> 2019: "There were no objections made to D. Margaux’s January 29 intent to
> transfer to players other than emself and eir zombie the spaceships in the
> lost & found department."
> >
> > *3712 called 14 February 2019 by Falsifian, assigned 15 February 2019 to
> Trigon: "Agora is not Satisfied with an intent to perform an action unless
> it is to be performed With Notice or With T Notice. In particular, Gaelan's
> recent attempt to Declare Apathy on February 7, 2019 was ineffective, and
> D. Margaux's dependent actions in their recent message that starts 'I
> thought for sure people would object...' were ineffective."
> >
> > Highest numbered case: 3715
> >
> > Context/arguments/evidence are included at the bottom of this report.
> >
> >
> > Recently-delivered verdicts and implications
> > 
> >
> > 3700 called 01 February 2019 by G., assigned 03 February 2019 to Trigon,
> judged TRUE 06 February 2019 by Trigon, self-filed motion for
> reconsideration and recusal 07 February 2019 by Trigon, reassigned 07
> February 2019 to Murphy, judged TRUE 10 February 2019 by Murphy: "In the
> message quoted in evidence, D. Margaux earned at least 1 coin."
> >
> > 3702 called 01 February 2019 by Cuddle Beam, assigned 03 February 2019
> to ATMunn, reassigned 12 February 2019 to D. Margaux, judged TRUE 12
> February 2019 by D. Margaux: "Gaelan's (only) ship is at Sector 4."
> >
> > 3703 called 6 February 2019 by twg, assigned 6 February 2019 to Murphy,
> judged IRRELEVANT 10 February 2019 by Murphy: "If and when -N (negative N)
> coins are revoked from an entity, where N is a natural number, that
> entity's coin balance increases by N."
> >
> > *3705 called 9 February 2019 by twg, assigned 10 February 2019 to G.,
> judged FALSE 10 February 2019 by G.: "I own an Indigo Ribbon."
> >
> > *3706 called 9 February 2019 by twg, assigned 10 February 2019 to G.,
> judged TRUE 14 February 2019 by G.: "All Players are parties to the Rules
> as a contract."
> >
> > *3707 called 9 February 2019 by twg, assigned 10 February 2019 to G.,
> judged DISMISS 11 February 2019 by G.: "The Ruleset (as a contract) now has
> 1 coin."
> >
> > *3708 called 10 February 2019 by D. Margaux, assigned 10 February 2019
> to G., judged FALSE 13 February 2019 by G.: "The parties to an existing
> contract CAN agree to amend it by adding additional players as parties,
> even if those additional players did not expressly agree to be party to
> that contract apart from agreeing to be bound by the Rules generally."
> >
> > *3709 called 7 February 2019 by Gaelan, assigned 7 February 2019 to
> Aris, judged FALSE 7 February 2019 by Aris, motion for reconsideration
> filed 7 February 2019 by G., judged TRUE 14 February 2019 by Aris: "Gaelan
> won the game by one of the above declarations of apathy."
> >
> > *3710 called 7 February 2019 by Gaelan, assigned 7 February 2019 to
> Aris, judged FALSE 7 February 2019 by Aris, motion for reconsideration
> filed 7 February 2019 by G., judged TRUE 14 February 2019 by Aris: "Gaelan
> won the game twice by the above declarations of apathy."
> >
> > *3711 called 12 February 2019 by Falsifian, assigned 12 February 2019 to
> D. Margaux, judged FALSE 13 February 2019 by D. Margaux: "It is Falsifian's
> Agoran Birthday today (the day 

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Reuben Staley]

And I would have reconsidered if the motion had gone through.

--
Trigon

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 10:47 D. Margaux 
>
> > On Jan 29, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Reuben Staley 
> wrote:
> >
> > Interesting that I judged 3592 more recently than 83 or 84 but it's not
> > recorded anywhere.
>
> Oops. The decision in 3692 was recorded in the Court Gazette of 20
> January, but I forgot to add it to the list of recently judged CFJs. Will
> do that next time.
>
> BTW, G. had intended to seek reconsideration of that CFJ, which I thought
> was a good idea, because IRRELEVANT probably isn’t the right decision. If
> the arguments were lacking enough detail, I think DISMISS is more proper.
>
> It may be too late to do that though.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[D. Margaux]

> On Jan 29, 2019, at 12:28 PM, Reuben Staley  wrote:
> 
> Interesting that I judged 3592 more recently than 83 or 84 but it's not
> recorded anywhere.

Oops. The decision in 3692 was recorded in the Court Gazette of 20 January, but 
I forgot to add it to the list of recently judged CFJs. Will do that next time. 

BTW, G. had intended to seek reconsideration of that CFJ, which I thought was a 
good idea, because IRRELEVANT probably isn’t the right decision. If the 
arguments were lacking enough detail, I think DISMISS is more proper. 

It may be too late to do that though. 

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Edward Murphy]

V.J. Rada wrote:


Also, please take Gaelan off the list


Done, looks like e hasn't posted to a-b at all since late April.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Kerim Aydin]

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:
> G. wrote:
> 
> > CoE:  I think during my brief Reign of Terror, I recused all the late
> > judges and reassigned all these CFJs to myself?  Or do you think that
> > didn't work for some reason...
> 
> I interpreted the recusals as "assigned continuously since Nov 1",
> though if judgements aren't forthcoming then I may reassign them
> to you anyway just to collapse the gamestate.

Oh, gotcha I can see the ambiguity there - I meant assignments that
were made since Nov 1 I only used a cutoff date because sometimes
an ancient case turns up that's still open and didn't want that accidentally
assigned to me.

I meant to clear the full caseload (and resign and re-propose the fix) while 
waiting for the election to end - thought we were waiting for an assessor to 
do that, forgot that anyone could end an uncontested election...

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Edward Murphy]

G. wrote:


CoE:  I think during my brief Reign of Terror, I recused all the late
judges and reassigned all these CFJs to myself?  Or do you think that
didn't work for some reason...


I interpreted the recusals as "assigned continuously since Nov 1",
though if judgements aren't forthcoming then I may reassign them
to you anyway just to collapse the gamestate.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Ørjan Johansen]

NttPF

Greetings,
Ørjan.

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:


CoE:  I think during my brief Reign of Terror, I recused all the late
judges and reassigned all these CFJs to myself?  Or do you think that
didn't work for some reason...

On Sun, 28 Jan 2018, Edward Murphy wrote:



COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 28 Jan 2018]


Open Cases (CFJs)

[* = overdue, ! = <24 hours before deadline]

3614*  Assigned to o (due Fri, 15 Dec 2017 ~23:51:00)
3615*  Assigned to o (due Fri, 15 Dec 2017 ~23:51:00)

https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2017-December/012154.html
3616*  Assigned to Telnaior  (due Fri, 15 Dec 2017 ~23:52:39)

https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2017-December/012156.html
3618*  Assigned to ATMunn(due Fri, 15 Dec 2017 ~23:55:35)

https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2017-December/012157.html
3619   Assigned to G.(due Fri, 26 Jan 2018 ~23:00:27)

https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2018-January/037684.html

https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/2018-January/037707.html

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Kerim Aydin]

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> That's fine by me, yes. Everyone has periods of high activity and
> inactivity (well, I'm very active haha) and night court as a concept just
> encourages giving more cases to yourself.

I mainly invented it because, when I took over as Arbitor, there were several
cases that were caught in limbo because of failed motions or something, 
where no one cared about the answer anymore, and it was easiest for me to
just whip through the backlog (those are still reflected on my count below,
3556 was the last of those).  But once that backlog was cleared, it turned
out that was a rare event and all the day/night assignments have been pretty
much identical.

I *will* admit to silently Favoring ones that come along (not breaking
self-interest ethics I hope) but I'm pretty much even with Day judges
right now.  And R991 actually explicitly allows me some self-interest,
so I'd be breaking the rules if I didn't do that :P.

> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Kerim Aydin  wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > Judge  Court[***]   Recent
> > > -  ---
> > > G. Night3556, 3567, 3563, 3579, 3580, 3582, 3595, 3596
> > > PubliusNight3558, 3561, 3574, 3576, 3591
> > > Corona Night
> > > o  Day  3568, 3565, 3572, 3584, 3590, 3592, 3599-3601
> > > Aris   Day  3557, 3562, 3577, 3578, 3589, 3597
> > > V.J. Rada  Day  3585
> > > Telnaior   Day  3586, 3594, 3602
> > > Alexis Weekend  3573, 3581, 3587, 3588, 3603, 3604
> > > ATMunn Weekend  3593, 3598
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > I'm thinking of doing away with the whole night/day distinction (but
> > keeping weekends).  Even if someone is generally able to do a quick
> > turnaround doesn't guarantee they could do it in a particular given
> > week, and there's not enough cases like that to track.
> >
> > Instead, if a case is particularly urgent, maybe the caller could
> > point it out in big letters, then I might ask for favor-ers who could
> > be quick on a case-by-case basis.
> >
> > Happy to take feedback here.
> >
> > -G.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> From V.J. Rada
>

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Kerim Aydin]

Of course!  Also done.

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Madeline wrote:
> I also wouldn't mind going onto the Day Court if you consider me suitable.
> 
> 
> On 2017-11-13 10:03, VJ Rada wrote:
> > Given that there are now 2 day-court people and 5 weekenders, a
> > seemingly bad ratio, whack me on the day court, please (it's not as if
> > I don't call half of CFJs anyway rip).

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Madeline]

I also wouldn't mind going onto the Day Court if you consider me suitable.


On 2017-11-13 10:03, VJ Rada wrote:

Given that there are now 2 day-court people and 5 weekenders, a
seemingly bad ratio, whack me on the day court, please (it's not as if
I don't call half of CFJs anyway rip).

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Kerim Aydin  wrote:



COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 12 Nov 2017]


Open Cases (CFJs)

[* = overdue, ! = <24 hours before deadline]

3591 Motioned to Publius  (due Sat, 18 Nov 2017 ~03:14:10)
3592 Assigned to o(due Sun, 19 Nov 2017 ~22:02:39)
3593 Assigned to ATMunn   (due Sun, 19 Nov 2017 ~22:04:09)
3594 Assigned to Telnaior (due Sun, 19 Nov 2017 ~22:10:28)
3595 Assigned to G.   (due Sun, 19 Nov 2017 ~22:14:02)
3596 Assigned to G.   (due Sun, 19 Nov 2017 ~22:16:00)
3597 Assigned to Aris (due Sun, 19 Nov 2017 ~22:19:51)


Recently-Delivered Verdicts and Implications

[** = consider for rules annotation, ! = delivered late]

3589 by Aris:  Can't promise a million dollars if your contract is no good.

3590 by o:  Found that some subject line actions fail tests of working
using CFJ 3409 standards.

3591 by Publius:  Initial finding that re-ratifying an alleged voting
report does not re-resolve the decision (Motion to Reconsider filed).


Bench Roster

Judge  Court[***]   Recent
-  ---
G. Night3556, 3567, 3563, 3579, 3580, 3582, 3595, 3596
PubliusNight3558, 3561, 3574, 3576, 3591
o  Day  3568, 3565, 3572, 3584, 3590, 3592
Aris   Day  3557, 3562, 3577, 3578, 3589, 3597
Alexis Weekend  3573, 3581, 3587, 3588
V.J. Rada  Weekend  3585
NichdelWeekend  3571, 3583
Telnaior   Weekend  3586, 3594
ATMunn Weekend  3593

Highest Numbered Case:   3597

[***] Court Descriptions

Day Court   [Default, rotate roster through as needed].

Night Court [Assigned quick turnaround cases (either trivial or
  game-urgent), generally promises to judge in 4 days].

Weekend Court [Backup/partial rotation, generally gets half as many
cases each as Day Court].

Courts are informal relative levels of "interest" in judging as per
R991.  Players can change Court by notifying the Arbitor.


DISCLAIMER
   Informational only - No actions are contained in this report.
   Information in this report is NOT self-ratifying.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Kerim Aydin]

Will do and appreciated.  (Night gets pretty much the same load as Day 
except when there's urgent cases, so it's not as uneven as it looks).

And yeah - I've noted that your tendency to call a lot means there
are fewer that I can assign you to!  About half your light load to
date is because weekend, the other half because of that tendency...

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> Given that there are now 2 day-court people and 5 weekenders, a
> seemingly bad ratio, whack me on the day court, please (it's not as if
> I don't call half of CFJs anyway rip).

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[ATMunn]

Yay, thanks.

On 11/4/2017 10:44 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:



On Sat, 4 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote:

I'd like to maybe get into judging CFJs.

Can I request to be placed in the Weekend court?


Yep!  You're now on the list.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Kerim Aydin]

On Sat, 4 Nov 2017, ATMunn wrote:
> I'd like to maybe get into judging CFJs.
> 
> Can I request to be placed in the Weekend court?

Yep!  You're now on the list.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Kerim Aydin]

No worries!  You should always feel free to send a draft judgement to
Discussion first, to get feedback.

On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Madeline wrote:
> Thanks! The main things I'm worried about are not really knowing much about
> the precedent of the game, and possibly missing a relevant rule. Hopefully
> Ctrl-F on the ruleset and CFJ archive should help there, at least! (Along with
> experience, of course)
> 
> 
> On 2017-10-22 11:40, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > 
> > Absolutely!  You're on the list.  I'll try to look out for ones that aren't
> > "super-complicated" to start.
> > 
> > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Madeline wrote:
> > > Would I be able to give the Weekend Court a try, perhaps? I might need
> > > some
> > > assistance at first with learning the ropes of what to consider when
> > > making a
> > > judgement and how to consider it, but I'm definitely interested in trying.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 2017-10-22 11:18, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 22 Oct 2017]
> > > > 
> > > > (all outstanding cases were cleared this past week - well done judges!)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Open Cases (CFJs)
> > > > 
> > > > [* = overdue, ! = <24 hours before deadline]
> > > > 3576 assigned to Gaelan  (due Sat, 28 Oct 2017 ~23:55:16 UTC)
> > > > 3577 assigned to Aris(due Sat, 28 Oct 2017 ~23:57:40 UTC)
> > > > 3578 assigned to Aris(due Sat, 28 Oct 2017 ~23:57:40 UTC)
> > > > 3579 assigned to G.  (due Sat, 28 Oct 2017 ~23:59:58 UTC)
> > > > 3580 assigned to G.  (due Sun, 29 Oct 2017 ~00:04:34 UTC)
> > > > 3581 assigned to Alexis  (due Sun, 29 Oct 2017 ~00:08:50 UTC)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Recently-Delivered Verdicts and Implications
> > > > 
> > > > [** = consider for rules annotation, ! = delivered late]
> > > > 
> > > > !3570 by nichdel:  "G is Overlord of Dunce" was not an agency so "Ben
> > > > Öyle Öneriyorum" is not an agency.
> > > > 
> > > > !3571 by nichdel:  "G: Overlord of Dunce" is an Agency via ratification.
> > > > 
> > > > 3573 by Alexis:  G. was the Speaker for the period of time indicated,
> > > > but maybe more than that (wording of CFJ doesn't quite get at underlying
> > > > question).
> > > > 
> > > > **!3574 by Publius:  If a person is the head of an Agency and
> > > > deregisters, the Agency ceases being an Agency.  But if the person
> > > > re-registers, it becomes an Agency again.
> > > > 
> > > > 3575 by V.J. Rada:  Oxford commas matter.
> > > > 
> > > > !3563 by G.:  Under the previous pledge rules, a pledge (in general)
> > > > could only be broken once.
> > > > 
> > > > 3568 Moot concluded:  Case is REMANDED to o.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Bench Roster
> > > > 
> > > > Judge  Court[***]Recent
> > > > -  - --
> > > > G. Night 3556, 3567, 3563, 3579, 3580
> > > > PubliusNight 3558, 3561, 3574
> > > > o  Day   3568, 3565, 3572
> > > > Aris   Day   3557, 3562, 3577, 3578
> > > > Gaelan Day   3564, 3576
> > > > Alexis Day   3573, 3581
> > > > V.J. Rada  Weekend
> > > > NichdelWeekend   3571
> > > > 
> > > > Highest Numbered Case:   3581
> > > > 
> > > > [***] Court Descriptions
> > > > 
> > > > Day Court   [Default, rotate roster through as needed].
> > > > 
> > > > Night Court [Assigned quick turnaround cases (either trivial or
> > > >game-urgent), generally promises to judge in 4 days].
> > > > 
> > > > Weekend Court [Backup/partial rotation, generally gets half as many
> > > >  cases each as Day Court].
> > > > 
> > > > Courts are informal relative levels of "interest" in judging as per
> > > > R991.  Players can change Court by notifying the Arbitor.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > DISCLAIMER
> > > > Informational only - No actions are contained in this report.
> > > > Information in this report is NOT self-ratifying.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> 
>

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Madeline]

Thanks! The main things I'm worried about are not really knowing much 
about the precedent of the game, and possibly missing a relevant rule. 
Hopefully Ctrl-F on the ruleset and CFJ archive should help there, at 
least! (Along with experience, of course)



On 2017-10-22 11:40, Kerim Aydin wrote:


Absolutely!  You're on the list.  I'll try to look out for ones that aren't
"super-complicated" to start.

On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Madeline wrote:

Would I be able to give the Weekend Court a try, perhaps? I might need some
assistance at first with learning the ropes of what to consider when making a
judgement and how to consider it, but I'm definitely interested in trying.


On 2017-10-22 11:18, Kerim Aydin wrote:


COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 22 Oct 2017]

(all outstanding cases were cleared this past week - well done judges!)


Open Cases (CFJs)

[* = overdue, ! = <24 hours before deadline]
3576 assigned to Gaelan  (due Sat, 28 Oct 2017 ~23:55:16 UTC)
3577 assigned to Aris(due Sat, 28 Oct 2017 ~23:57:40 UTC)
3578 assigned to Aris(due Sat, 28 Oct 2017 ~23:57:40 UTC)
3579 assigned to G.  (due Sat, 28 Oct 2017 ~23:59:58 UTC)
3580 assigned to G.  (due Sun, 29 Oct 2017 ~00:04:34 UTC)
3581 assigned to Alexis  (due Sun, 29 Oct 2017 ~00:08:50 UTC)


Recently-Delivered Verdicts and Implications

[** = consider for rules annotation, ! = delivered late]

!3570 by nichdel:  "G is Overlord of Dunce" was not an agency so "Ben
Öyle Öneriyorum" is not an agency.

!3571 by nichdel:  "G: Overlord of Dunce" is an Agency via ratification.

3573 by Alexis:  G. was the Speaker for the period of time indicated,
but maybe more than that (wording of CFJ doesn't quite get at underlying
question).

**!3574 by Publius:  If a person is the head of an Agency and
deregisters, the Agency ceases being an Agency.  But if the person
re-registers, it becomes an Agency again.

3575 by V.J. Rada:  Oxford commas matter.

!3563 by G.:  Under the previous pledge rules, a pledge (in general)
could only be broken once.

3568 Moot concluded:  Case is REMANDED to o.


Bench Roster

Judge  Court[***]Recent
-  - --
G. Night 3556, 3567, 3563, 3579, 3580
PubliusNight 3558, 3561, 3574
o  Day   3568, 3565, 3572
Aris   Day   3557, 3562, 3577, 3578
Gaelan Day   3564, 3576
Alexis Day   3573, 3581
V.J. Rada  Weekend
NichdelWeekend   3571

Highest Numbered Case:   3581

[***] Court Descriptions

Day Court   [Default, rotate roster through as needed].

Night Court [Assigned quick turnaround cases (either trivial or
   game-urgent), generally promises to judge in 4 days].

Weekend Court [Backup/partial rotation, generally gets half as many
 cases each as Day Court].

Courts are informal relative levels of "interest" in judging as per
R991.  Players can change Court by notifying the Arbitor.


DISCLAIMER
Informational only - No actions are contained in this report.
Information in this report is NOT self-ratifying.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Kerim Aydin]

Absolutely!  You're on the list.  I'll try to look out for ones that aren't
"super-complicated" to start.

On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Madeline wrote:
> Would I be able to give the Weekend Court a try, perhaps? I might need some
> assistance at first with learning the ropes of what to consider when making a
> judgement and how to consider it, but I'm definitely interested in trying.
> 
> 
> On 2017-10-22 11:18, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > COURT GAZETTE [Arbitor's Weekly Report for 22 Oct 2017]
> > 
> > (all outstanding cases were cleared this past week - well done judges!)
> > 
> > 
> > Open Cases (CFJs)
> > 
> > [* = overdue, ! = <24 hours before deadline]
> >3576 assigned to Gaelan  (due Sat, 28 Oct 2017 ~23:55:16 UTC)
> > 3577 assigned to Aris(due Sat, 28 Oct 2017 ~23:57:40 UTC)
> > 3578 assigned to Aris(due Sat, 28 Oct 2017 ~23:57:40 UTC)
> > 3579 assigned to G.  (due Sat, 28 Oct 2017 ~23:59:58 UTC)
> > 3580 assigned to G.  (due Sun, 29 Oct 2017 ~00:04:34 UTC)
> > 3581 assigned to Alexis  (due Sun, 29 Oct 2017 ~00:08:50 UTC)
> > 
> > 
> > Recently-Delivered Verdicts and Implications
> > 
> > [** = consider for rules annotation, ! = delivered late]
> > 
> > !3570 by nichdel:  "G is Overlord of Dunce" was not an agency so "Ben
> > Öyle Öneriyorum" is not an agency.
> > 
> > !3571 by nichdel:  "G: Overlord of Dunce" is an Agency via ratification.
> > 
> > 3573 by Alexis:  G. was the Speaker for the period of time indicated,
> > but maybe more than that (wording of CFJ doesn't quite get at underlying
> > question).
> > 
> > **!3574 by Publius:  If a person is the head of an Agency and
> > deregisters, the Agency ceases being an Agency.  But if the person
> > re-registers, it becomes an Agency again.
> > 
> > 3575 by V.J. Rada:  Oxford commas matter.
> > 
> > !3563 by G.:  Under the previous pledge rules, a pledge (in general)
> > could only be broken once.
> > 
> > 3568 Moot concluded:  Case is REMANDED to o.
> > 
> > 
> > Bench Roster
> > 
> > Judge  Court[***]Recent
> > -  - --
> > G. Night 3556, 3567, 3563, 3579, 3580
> > PubliusNight 3558, 3561, 3574
> > o  Day   3568, 3565, 3572
> > Aris   Day   3557, 3562, 3577, 3578
> > Gaelan Day   3564, 3576
> > Alexis Day   3573, 3581
> > V.J. Rada  Weekend
> > NichdelWeekend   3571
> > 
> > Highest Numbered Case:   3581
> > 
> > [***] Court Descriptions
> > 
> > Day Court   [Default, rotate roster through as needed].
> > 
> > Night Court [Assigned quick turnaround cases (either trivial or
> >   game-urgent), generally promises to judge in 4 days].
> > 
> > Weekend Court [Backup/partial rotation, generally gets half as many
> > cases each as Day Court].
> > 
> > Courts are informal relative levels of "interest" in judging as per
> > R991.  Players can change Court by notifying the Arbitor.
> > 
> > 
> > DISCLAIMER
> >Informational only - No actions are contained in this report.
> >Information in this report is NOT self-ratifying.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Court Gazette

[Kerim Aydin]

On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> 3575 should be listed as "recent" for me.
> 
> Apart from that, thanks for this report as always.

I should have explained:  when everyone has at least one case under "recent", 
I drop everyone's oldest one (it's for making sure people have relatively 
similar
caseloads). It's like sideways tetris.  That was the only one in your row when
I dropped them. Still, I should leave it on at least in the week it's judged so
will do that in future!   (so yeah, admitted).