[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-14 Thread Ben Jackson
Gary Lockhart wrote:
> Thank you sharing some good operating practices that would make satellite ops 
> in the US more enjoyable and equitable as well.



Also feel free to check out my "Courteous Ham's Guide to AO-51"

http://www.innismir.net/article/26



-- 
Ben Jackson - N1WBV - New Bedford, MA
bbj  innismir.net - http://www.innismir.net/
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-13 Thread n4csitwo
Samudra,
I think that typically on FM repeaters, you should be able to understand the 
letters being spoken as easily as phonetics since there is usually so little 
noise on a local FM repeater as compared to a satellite signal where you are 
dealing with fading and QRM much of the time. BTW, thanks again for all your 
help during the Symposium.

Dave, AA4KN

- Original Message - 
From: "Samudra Haque N3RDX" 
To: "Tony Langdon" 
Cc: ; "Gary Lockhart" ; "Eric 
Knaps,ON4HF" 
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 5:10 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe


I asked as I am still puzzled why in the US on local FM nets hams just
use "n,3,r,d,x" instead of "november three romeo david x-ray".



On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Tony Langdon  wrote:
> At 07:30 AM 10/14/2009, Samudra Haque wrote:
>>
>> on a satellite QSO, is it traditional to say "A, B, C" instead of
>> "Alfa Bravo Charlie" for brevity when referring to call signs and grid
>> locators ?
>
> That can backfire and waste time, due to people not understanding the
> letters. For example, my callsign under adverse conditions could be mis
> heard as (heard most of the following on terrestrial repeaters or
> IRLP/Echolink, let alone on the birds!):
>
> VK3JEB
> VK3JD
> VK3JB
> VK3JEV
> VK3JV
>
> And the list goes on ;) The overhead in asking for clarification or
> getting a correction outweighs the overhead of using phonetics in most
> cases. Once callsigns are confirmed, you can drop the phonetics (though
> usually by then, the QSO is over, so someone else can have a go ;) ).
> Phonetics are also more likely to survive brief bursts of QRM or brief
> fades.
>
> 73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
> http://vkradio.com
>
>

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb 

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-13 Thread Tony Langdon
At 07:53 AM 10/14/2009, David - KG4ZLB wrote:
>Perhaps these could be translated into Spanish!

If anyone wants to translate them into any language, go right 
ahead.  Just make a note where the source for the translation came from.

73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-13 Thread David Wing
I do that on FM repeaters and on the birds when I'm working with people who
recognize my call sign or are likely to.  I'll switch to phonetics if there
is someone new to me or when I'm calling CQ


-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Samudra Haque N3RDX
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 2:11 PM
To: Tony Langdon
Cc: amsat-bb@amsat.org; Gary Lockhart; Eric Knaps,ON4HF
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

I asked as I am still puzzled why in the US on local FM nets hams just
use "n,3,r,d,x" instead of "november three romeo david x-ray".



On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Tony Langdon  wrote:
> At 07:30 AM 10/14/2009, Samudra Haque wrote:
>>
>> on a satellite QSO, is it traditional to say "A, B, C" instead of
>> "Alfa Bravo Charlie" for brevity when referring to call signs and grid
>> locators ?
>
> That can backfire and waste time, due to people not understanding the
> letters.  For example, my callsign under adverse conditions could be mis
> heard as (heard most of the following on terrestrial repeaters or
> IRLP/Echolink, let alone on the birds!):
>
> VK3JEB
> VK3JD
> VK3JB
> VK3JEV
> VK3JV
>
> And the list goes on ;)  The overhead in asking for clarification or
> getting a correction outweighs the overhead of using phonetics in most
> cases.  Once callsigns are confirmed, you can drop the phonetics (though
> usually by then, the QSO is over, so someone else can have a go ;) ).
>  Phonetics are also more likely to survive brief bursts of QRM or brief
> fades.
>
> 73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
> http://vkradio.com
>
>

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-13 Thread Nigel Gunn G8IFF/W8IFF
Probably because David is not a member of the approved NATO alphabet.

Samudra Haque N3RDX wrote:
> I asked as I am still puzzled why in the US on local FM nets hams just
> use "n,3,r,d,x" instead of "november three romeo david x-ray".
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-13 Thread Samudra Haque N3RDX
I asked as I am still puzzled why in the US on local FM nets hams just
use "n,3,r,d,x" instead of "november three romeo david x-ray".



On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Tony Langdon  wrote:
> At 07:30 AM 10/14/2009, Samudra Haque wrote:
>>
>> on a satellite QSO, is it traditional to say "A, B, C" instead of
>> "Alfa Bravo Charlie" for brevity when referring to call signs and grid
>> locators ?
>
> That can backfire and waste time, due to people not understanding the
> letters.  For example, my callsign under adverse conditions could be mis
> heard as (heard most of the following on terrestrial repeaters or
> IRLP/Echolink, let alone on the birds!):
>
> VK3JEB
> VK3JD
> VK3JB
> VK3JEV
> VK3JV
>
> And the list goes on ;)  The overhead in asking for clarification or
> getting a correction outweighs the overhead of using phonetics in most
> cases.  Once callsigns are confirmed, you can drop the phonetics (though
> usually by then, the QSO is over, so someone else can have a go ;) ).
>  Phonetics are also more likely to survive brief bursts of QRM or brief
> fades.
>
> 73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
> http://vkradio.com
>
>

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-13 Thread Tony Langdon
At 07:30 AM 10/14/2009, Samudra Haque wrote:
>on a satellite QSO, is it traditional to say "A, B, C" instead of
>"Alfa Bravo Charlie" for brevity when referring to call signs and grid
>locators ?

That can backfire and waste time, due to people not understanding the 
letters.  For example, my callsign under adverse conditions could be 
mis heard as (heard most of the following on terrestrial repeaters or 
IRLP/Echolink, let alone on the birds!):

VK3JEB
VK3JD
VK3JB
VK3JEV
VK3JV

And the list goes on ;)  The overhead in asking for clarification 
or getting a correction outweighs the overhead of using phonetics in 
most cases.  Once callsigns are confirmed, you can drop the phonetics 
(though usually by then, the QSO is over, so someone else can have a 
go ;) ).  Phonetics are also more likely to survive brief bursts of 
QRM or brief fades.

73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-13 Thread David - KG4ZLB
Perhaps these could be translated into Spanish!

David
KG4ZLB



Eric Knaps, ON4HF wrote:
> Hello all,
> I found these nice rules from VK3JED:
>
>  1. First and foremost is to listen before and while (if possible)
>  transmitting, to ensure your transmissions don't drown out a weaker
>  station who may be on the edge of a pass or running QRP. Satellites
>  should be an alligator free zone. It is strongly recommended that you
>  set your station up so you can monitor the downlink while
>  transmitting, so you can hear how well you are accessing the satellite
>  and whether you accidentally clobbered someone else. Similarly, if you
>  can't hear the transponder, don't transmit. Do something else more
>  productive, such as realign your receiving antenna to improve
>  reception.
>   2. Be brief. Because the traffic levels can be quite high, contest style
>  (callsign/signal report/next station) operation is the most
>  appropriate for most situations. Many stations also exchange QTH and
>  first names, which is OK if time permits. If transponder activity is
>  low, you can have a brief chat, but the opportunities for this are
>  becoming rare now.
>   3. Take turns. If you've just worked a handful of stations, be polite and
>  hand the transponder over to someone else so they can work a few.
>  There may be an opportunity to call back in later during the pass and
>  work some different stations as the satellite passes over different
>  areas, and others will appreciate your courtesy.
>   4. When calling, a simple announcement (e.g. "This is VK3JED listening
>  SUNSAT" or even "VK3JED listening") will suffice, like it does on a
>  terrestrial repeater. Anyone within transponder range will hear your
>  call. A short CQ call ("CQ SUNSAT, this is VK3JED") is OK too. Long CQ
>  calls waste transponder time and frustrate everyone listening. Save
>  the long CQs for HF, where they're appropriate. Only call CQ when
>  there's a distinct lack of activity, such as at the very start of a
>  pass and sometimes late in the pass after everyone else has finished.
>  A well placed CQ call late in a pass might alert someone ahead of the
>  satellite that a pass has just commenced over their QTH.
>   5. Wait your turn. If a QSO is in progress, wait until it finishes before
>  putting in your call. Butting in too soon is rude and wastes precious
>  transponder time as the stations involved in the QSO have to repeat
>  themselves due to your QRM.
>   6. Don't tune up! Believe it or not, there are stations who test their
>  satellite access by dropping a carrier over the top of everyone and
>  perhaps announcing "Hello hello". Simply putting out a call at the
>  appropriate time will provide all the signal checks you need (and get
>  you a worthwhile contact! :) ), without annoying everyone else on the
>  transponder. If you're really that doubtful about your equipment,
>  perhaps connect your dummy load, test in the shack and try again
>  another day, rather than disrupting everyone else. If you just want to
>  hear your voice, well a tape recorder or a pair of walkie talkies will
>  do just as well...
>   7. Reward good operation. If you're answering a call, why not reward the
>  good operators and put the alligators last on your list of priorities.
>  If all satellite users favour good operators, perhaps everyone will
>  learn that good ops have the highest QSO rates and earn the most
>  satellite awards. :-) Peer pressure is a powerful motivating force, as
>  any teenager will know (but probably not admit to! :-) ).
>   8. Use the minimum power necessary. While power levels are not critical
>  on FM satellites (unlike linear transponders where an excessively
>  strong signal can affect other QSOs on the transponder), using the
>  minimum power necessary allows you to easier tell if you're 'doubling'
>  with someone else. For the South African SUNSAT satellite, you
>  shouldn't need more than 5 watts into a basic (1/2 wave handheld or
>  turnstile) antenna, perhaps a bit more if the antenna is setup for
>  terrestrial operation, to overcome radiation pattern limitations. As
>  an example of good operation, recently one station who had multiple
>  beams wound his power back to 20 mW. The signal into the bird was full
>  quieting, but it was still possible to tell if someone else was
>  underneath his signal. If he had run 100W, he couldn't have known if
>  he'd stepped on anyone else, due to the capture effect of FM.
>
> If everyone follows these simple guidelines (which are basically common
> sense and courtesy), then FM satellite operation can be enjoyable for
> everyone, regardless of whether you run a sophisticated satellite station
> or a couple of handhelds from the back yard. FM satellite transponders

[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-13 Thread Samudra Haque
on a satellite QSO, is it traditional to say "A, B, C" instead of
"Alfa Bravo Charlie" for brevity when referring to call signs and grid
locators ?

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Eric Knaps, ON4HF
 wrote:
> Hello all,
> I found these nice rules from VK3JED:
>
>  1. First and foremost is to listen before and while (if possible)
>     transmitting, to ensure your transmissions don't drown out a weaker
>     station who may be on the edge of a pass or running QRP. Satellites
>     should be an alligator free zone. It is strongly recommended that you
>     set your station up so you can monitor the downlink while
>     transmitting, so you can hear how well you are accessing the satellite
>     and whether you accidentally clobbered someone else. Similarly, if you
>     can't hear the transponder, don't transmit. Do something else more
>     productive, such as realign your receiving antenna to improve
>     reception.
>  2. Be brief. Because the traffic levels can be quite high, contest style
>     (callsign/signal report/next station) operation is the most
>     appropriate for most situations. Many stations also exchange QTH and
>     first names, which is OK if time permits. If transponder activity is
>     low, you can have a brief chat, but the opportunities for this are
>     becoming rare now.
>  3. Take turns. If you've just worked a handful of stations, be polite and
>     hand the transponder over to someone else so they can work a few.
>     There may be an opportunity to call back in later during the pass and
>     work some different stations as the satellite passes over different
>     areas, and others will appreciate your courtesy.
>  4. When calling, a simple announcement (e.g. "This is VK3JED listening
>     SUNSAT" or even "VK3JED listening") will suffice, like it does on a
>     terrestrial repeater. Anyone within transponder range will hear your
>     call. A short CQ call ("CQ SUNSAT, this is VK3JED") is OK too. Long CQ
>     calls waste transponder time and frustrate everyone listening. Save
>     the long CQs for HF, where they're appropriate. Only call CQ when
>     there's a distinct lack of activity, such as at the very start of a
>     pass and sometimes late in the pass after everyone else has finished.
>     A well placed CQ call late in a pass might alert someone ahead of the
>     satellite that a pass has just commenced over their QTH.
>  5. Wait your turn. If a QSO is in progress, wait until it finishes before
>     putting in your call. Butting in too soon is rude and wastes precious
>     transponder time as the stations involved in the QSO have to repeat
>     themselves due to your QRM.
>  6. Don't tune up! Believe it or not, there are stations who test their
>     satellite access by dropping a carrier over the top of everyone and
>     perhaps announcing "Hello hello". Simply putting out a call at the
>     appropriate time will provide all the signal checks you need (and get
>     you a worthwhile contact! :) ), without annoying everyone else on the
>     transponder. If you're really that doubtful about your equipment,
>     perhaps connect your dummy load, test in the shack and try again
>     another day, rather than disrupting everyone else. If you just want to
>     hear your voice, well a tape recorder or a pair of walkie talkies will
>     do just as well...
>  7. Reward good operation. If you're answering a call, why not reward the
>     good operators and put the alligators last on your list of priorities.
>     If all satellite users favour good operators, perhaps everyone will
>     learn that good ops have the highest QSO rates and earn the most
>     satellite awards. :-) Peer pressure is a powerful motivating force, as
>     any teenager will know (but probably not admit to! :-) ).
>  8. Use the minimum power necessary. While power levels are not critical
>     on FM satellites (unlike linear transponders where an excessively
>     strong signal can affect other QSOs on the transponder), using the
>     minimum power necessary allows you to easier tell if you're 'doubling'
>     with someone else. For the South African SUNSAT satellite, you
>     shouldn't need more than 5 watts into a basic (1/2 wave handheld or
>     turnstile) antenna, perhaps a bit more if the antenna is setup for
>     terrestrial operation, to overcome radiation pattern limitations. As
>     an example of good operation, recently one station who had multiple
>     beams wound his power back to 20 mW. The signal into the bird was full
>     quieting, but it was still possible to tell if someone else was
>     underneath his signal. If he had run 100W, he couldn't have known if
>     he'd stepped on anyone else, due to the capture effect of FM.
>
> If everyone follows these simple guidelines (which are basically common
> sense and courtesy), then FM satellite operation can be enjoyable for
> everyone, regardless of whether you run a sophisticated satellite station
> or a couple of 

[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-13 Thread Eric Knaps, ON4HF
Hello all,
I found these nice rules from VK3JED:

 1. First and foremost is to listen before and while (if possible)
 transmitting, to ensure your transmissions don't drown out a weaker
 station who may be on the edge of a pass or running QRP. Satellites
 should be an alligator free zone. It is strongly recommended that you
 set your station up so you can monitor the downlink while
 transmitting, so you can hear how well you are accessing the satellite
 and whether you accidentally clobbered someone else. Similarly, if you
 can't hear the transponder, don't transmit. Do something else more
 productive, such as realign your receiving antenna to improve
 reception.
  2. Be brief. Because the traffic levels can be quite high, contest style
 (callsign/signal report/next station) operation is the most
 appropriate for most situations. Many stations also exchange QTH and
 first names, which is OK if time permits. If transponder activity is
 low, you can have a brief chat, but the opportunities for this are
 becoming rare now.
  3. Take turns. If you've just worked a handful of stations, be polite and
 hand the transponder over to someone else so they can work a few.
 There may be an opportunity to call back in later during the pass and
 work some different stations as the satellite passes over different
 areas, and others will appreciate your courtesy.
  4. When calling, a simple announcement (e.g. "This is VK3JED listening
 SUNSAT" or even "VK3JED listening") will suffice, like it does on a
 terrestrial repeater. Anyone within transponder range will hear your
 call. A short CQ call ("CQ SUNSAT, this is VK3JED") is OK too. Long CQ
 calls waste transponder time and frustrate everyone listening. Save
 the long CQs for HF, where they're appropriate. Only call CQ when
 there's a distinct lack of activity, such as at the very start of a
 pass and sometimes late in the pass after everyone else has finished.
 A well placed CQ call late in a pass might alert someone ahead of the
 satellite that a pass has just commenced over their QTH.
  5. Wait your turn. If a QSO is in progress, wait until it finishes before
 putting in your call. Butting in too soon is rude and wastes precious
 transponder time as the stations involved in the QSO have to repeat
 themselves due to your QRM.
  6. Don't tune up! Believe it or not, there are stations who test their
 satellite access by dropping a carrier over the top of everyone and
 perhaps announcing "Hello hello". Simply putting out a call at the
 appropriate time will provide all the signal checks you need (and get
 you a worthwhile contact! :) ), without annoying everyone else on the
 transponder. If you're really that doubtful about your equipment,
 perhaps connect your dummy load, test in the shack and try again
 another day, rather than disrupting everyone else. If you just want to
 hear your voice, well a tape recorder or a pair of walkie talkies will
 do just as well...
  7. Reward good operation. If you're answering a call, why not reward the
 good operators and put the alligators last on your list of priorities.
 If all satellite users favour good operators, perhaps everyone will
 learn that good ops have the highest QSO rates and earn the most
 satellite awards. :-) Peer pressure is a powerful motivating force, as
 any teenager will know (but probably not admit to! :-) ).
  8. Use the minimum power necessary. While power levels are not critical
 on FM satellites (unlike linear transponders where an excessively
 strong signal can affect other QSOs on the transponder), using the
 minimum power necessary allows you to easier tell if you're 'doubling'
 with someone else. For the South African SUNSAT satellite, you
 shouldn't need more than 5 watts into a basic (1/2 wave handheld or
 turnstile) antenna, perhaps a bit more if the antenna is setup for
 terrestrial operation, to overcome radiation pattern limitations. As
 an example of good operation, recently one station who had multiple
 beams wound his power back to 20 mW. The signal into the bird was full
 quieting, but it was still possible to tell if someone else was
 underneath his signal. If he had run 100W, he couldn't have known if
 he'd stepped on anyone else, due to the capture effect of FM.

If everyone follows these simple guidelines (which are basically common
sense and courtesy), then FM satellite operation can be enjoyable for
everyone, regardless of whether you run a sophisticated satellite station
or a couple of handhelds from the back yard. FM satellite transponders are
like FM repeaters, only more extreme. On the positive side, they can enable
minimally equipped stations thousands of kilometres apart to communicate
with ease. On the other hand, the worst aspects of repeaters can be
experience

[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-12 Thread Gary Lockhart
Thank you sharing some good operating practices that would make satellite ops 
in the US more enjoyable and equitable as well.
73, Gary AB3ID   

*
Hi all in Europe,
It is obviously about time to repeate a few 
good points about operating via the FM repeater 
satellites.

1. Do not transmit if you can not hear it

2. When the satellite is busy - limit the number of QSO's to ONE

3. Do not call over an ongoing QSO

4. A valid QSO just needs the call and the report

5. Give way to weak stations like /p and /m 

6. Allow DX-peditions to make as many QSO's as there are callers

That was the short version :-)

I have a long version in English, Italian, Russian, Spanish and French.
I can send it to you if you want it. Could use a few other languages 
like Greek, Polish and others.
It would be nice if you can get it in your national journals.

And please no flames !

73 OZ1MY
Ib
**


--


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-12 Thread Tony Langdon
At 05:26 AM 10/13/2009, Eric Knaps, ON4HF wrote:
>I like rule number 3. I hate it when somebody calls cq while you are in
>the middle of a qso.

In my experience, this is often due to a station that can't hear the 
downlink, but it's annoying in any case.

73 de VK3JED / VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FM satellite operations again again over Europe

2009-10-12 Thread Eric Knaps, ON4HF
I like rule number 3. I hate it when somebody calls cq while you are in 
the middle of a qso.

73,
Eric.

Eric Knaps
Waterstraat 30
B-3980 Tessenderlo
Belgium

Tel. +32472985876 (mobile)

http://www.on4hf.be



OZ1MY schreef:
> Hi all in Europe,
> It is obviously about time to repeate a few 
> good points about operating via the FM repeater 
> satellites.
>
> 1. Do not transmit if you can not hear it
>
> 2. When the satellite is busy - limit the number of QSO's to ONE
>
> 3. Do not call over an ongoing QSO
>
> 4. A valid QSO just needs the call and the report
>
> 5. Give way to weak stations like /p and /m 
>
> 6. Allow DX-peditions to make as many QSO's as there are callers
>
> That was the short version :-)
>
> I have a long version in English, Italian, Russian, Spanish and French.
> I can send it to you if you want it. Could use a few other languages 
> like Greek, Polish and others.
> It would be nice if you can get it in your national journals.
>
> And please no flames !
>
> 73 OZ1MY
> Ib
>
> ___
> Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>
>
>   
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb