[android-developers] Re: Android Activity stack
You don’t need to page your lists. The Android ListView is very efficient at displaying long lists (recycling views, fast scrolling, etc), assuming you are showing data derived from a database (there are other examples if you are dynamically downloading your data) The world of ListView http://code.google.com/events/io/2010/sessions/world-of-listview-android.html Regards Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Need I-phone app converted into an Android app.
According to a demo I watched at the last Berlin droidcon, the latest version of the Unity 3D engine supports outputting to Android. I suggest you take this up with Unity. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: HELP: A Verizon Droid puzzle.
Quick dial on the Last Caller mini widget is now live on the Market, enjoy, Mark On Jul 12, 10:43 pm, whitemice markbr...@zedray.co.uk wrote: Hi Operand Zombie Thanks for ruling out the CMDA API on your EVO. Issue is with the original Droid AFAIK (I'm guessing specific firmware), but I'll accept a LogCat trace from anyone who can reproduce the update issue on their device. Auto-populate/quick dial feature will be coming, as soon as I figure out how to make it work in the new 2:1 layout. Thanks for the feedback. Mark On Jul 11, 8:30 pm, Operand Zombie operandzom...@gmail.com wrote: I'd also highly doubt that the network type is impacting your app. Just to confirm, I downloaded your app on my EVO - a phone on the Sprint (CDMA) network, and it seems to work just fine (it'd be nice if when I tap the small 2x1 widget the persons number would auto-populate like when I tap the phone on the larger widget). So it would seem that the problem stems more from something the Droid is doing (the complaints are from Droid, and not Droid Incredible users, yes?), or perhaps some other app on the users phone.. On Jul 11, 11:18 am, whitemice markbr...@zedray.co.uk wrote: I am based in Germany and publish the Last Call Widget on the Android Market. I have been steady improving it over time, but one group of users still complain about it not working on their devices. My widget listens for the android.intent.action.PHONE_STATE intent, and then sets an alarm to update the last call UI in 20 seconds, then 60 seconds, then 5 minutes, 1 hour, etc. This works reliably on all my test devices, even with aggressive task killers (try it yourself). Unfortunately I have a cluster of users with Motorola Droids on the Verizon network who complain that the UI does not automatically update. I believe Verizon is a CDMA network (we have GSM here in Europe), though the Android API docs don't specify any implementation differences. This could also be a driver issue on the Motorola Droid (we have GSM Motorola Milestones in Europe). I am wondering if anyone reading is in a position to offer any ideas, or test the widget on a Droid and/or CDMA network to see if they can reproduce an issue (with logs)? Regards Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: HELP: A Verizon Droid puzzle.
Hi Operand Zombie Thanks for ruling out the CMDA API on your EVO. Issue is with the original Droid AFAIK (I'm guessing specific firmware), but I'll accept a LogCat trace from anyone who can reproduce the update issue on their device. Auto-populate/quick dial feature will be coming, as soon as I figure out how to make it work in the new 2:1 layout. Thanks for the feedback. Mark On Jul 11, 8:30 pm, Operand Zombie operandzom...@gmail.com wrote: I'd also highly doubt that the network type is impacting your app. Just to confirm, I downloaded your app on my EVO - a phone on the Sprint (CDMA) network, and it seems to work just fine (it'd be nice if when I tap the small 2x1 widget the persons number would auto-populate like when I tap the phone on the larger widget). So it would seem that the problem stems more from something the Droid is doing (the complaints are from Droid, and not Droid Incredible users, yes?), or perhaps some other app on the users phone.. On Jul 11, 11:18 am, whitemice markbr...@zedray.co.uk wrote: I am based in Germany and publish the Last Call Widget on the Android Market. I have been steady improving it over time, but one group of users still complain about it not working on their devices. My widget listens for the android.intent.action.PHONE_STATE intent, and then sets an alarm to update the last call UI in 20 seconds, then 60 seconds, then 5 minutes, 1 hour, etc. This works reliably on all my test devices, even with aggressive task killers (try it yourself). Unfortunately I have a cluster of users with Motorola Droids on the Verizon network who complain that the UI does not automatically update. I believe Verizon is a CDMA network (we have GSM here in Europe), though the Android API docs don't specify any implementation differences. This could also be a driver issue on the Motorola Droid (we have GSM Motorola Milestones in Europe). I am wondering if anyone reading is in a position to offer any ideas, or test the widget on a Droid and/or CDMA network to see if they can reproduce an issue (with logs)? Regards Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] HELP: A Verizon Droid puzzle.
I am based in Germany and publish the Last Call Widget on the Android Market. I have been steady improving it over time, but one group of users still complain about it not working on their devices. My widget listens for the android.intent.action.PHONE_STATE intent, and then sets an alarm to update the last call UI in 20 seconds, then 60 seconds, then 5 minutes, 1 hour, etc. This works reliably on all my test devices, even with aggressive task killers (try it yourself). Unfortunately I have a cluster of users with Motorola Droids on the Verizon network who complain that the UI does not automatically update. I believe Verizon is a CDMA network (we have GSM here in Europe), though the Android API docs don't specify any implementation differences. This could also be a driver issue on the Motorola Droid (we have GSM Motorola Milestones in Europe). I am wondering if anyone reading is in a position to offer any ideas, or test the widget on a Droid and/or CDMA network to see if they can reproduce an issue (with logs)? Regards Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Failing JUnit tests, not breaking my Ant script like I expect?
Hi Xavier Thanks for the feedback. I haven't found a utility for parsing the output (XML or otherwise) and breaking the build. If no one can suggest one, I'll just go an write one myself. Regards Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Failing JUnit tests, not breaking my Ant script like I expect?
My continuous integration server runs an Ant script, which calls
something like:
/tests/ant run-tests
My JUnit tests run, but with errors:
run-tests:
[echo] run-tests-helper.
[echo] Running tests ...
[exec]
[exec] com.zedray.stuff.FooBarTest:
[exec] com.zedray.stuff.FooBarTest:.INSTRUMENTATION_RESULT:
shortMsg=Some error in your code.
[exec] INSTRUMENTATION_RESULT:
longMsg=java.security.InvalidParameterException: Some error in your
code
[exec] INSTRUMENTATION_CODE: 0
The errors are OK, but my build script keeps going (eventually
publishing my broken app to my testers - bad!). What I would expect
is for the instrimentaiton to throw a build error, so my continuous
integration server (TeamCity in this case) realises that something has
gone wrong and reports a broken build. The failonerror is already
set in the relevant macrodef, so I'm not sure what else I can do?
/tests/build.xml
macrodef name=run-tests-helper
attribute name=emma.enabled default=false /
element name=extra-instrument-args optional=yes /
sequential
echoRunning tests .../echo
exec executable=${adb} failonerror=true
arg value=shell /
arg value=am /
arg value=instrument /
arg value=-w /
arg value=-e /
arg value=coverage /
arg value=@{emma.enabled} /
extra-instrument-args /
arg value=${manifest.package}/${test.runner} /
/exec
/sequential
/macrodef
Any ideas/suggestions on how to fix this?
Regards
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] JUnit Puzzle: How do I test a Service and an Application together?
I want to test a Service with my Application class pre-instantiated, a
bit like what happens on a real device.
My problem is I can't figure out a way to do this with the correct
Application context AND having the Application being instantiated
EXACTLY once. Being instantiated multiple times causes issues if
there is code which uses singletons, and/or performs registrations
tasks that should only be performed once.
Full code for this snippet can be downloaded here:
http://www.zedray.co.uk/temp/ServiceSnippet.zip
My test code:
=
public class ServiceDemoTest extends ServiceTestCaseServiceDemo {
protected final void setUp() throws Exception {
/** Setup the MainApplication. **/
mApplication = (ApplicationDemo)
Instrumentation.newApplication(ApplicationDemo.class, getContext());
mApplication.onCreate();
setApplication(mApplication);
super.setUp();
}
@Override
protected final void tearDown() throws Exception {
if (mApplication != null) {
mApplication.onTerminate();
mApplication = null;
}
setApplication(null);
super.tearDown();
}
@MediumTest
public final void testStartable() {
startService(new Intent(getContext(), ServiceDemo.class));
}
=
This produces the following trace, which suggests that several
instances of my Application are being created, or just that onCreate()
is being called several times:
=
05-21 16:20:43.667: INFO/ServiceSnippet(4126):
ApplicationDemo.onCreate() mInstanceId[0]
05-21 16:20:46.398: INFO/ServiceSnippet(4143):
ApplicationDemo.onCreate() mInstanceId[0]
05-21 16:20:46.437: INFO/ServiceSnippet(4143):
ApplicationDemo.onCreate() mInstanceId[1]
05-21 16:20:46.447: INFO/ServiceSnippet(4143): ServiceDemo.onCreate()
05-21 16:20:46.447: INFO/ServiceSnippet(4143): ServiceDemo.onStart()
05-21 16:20:46.466: INFO/ServiceSnippet(4143):
ApplicationDemo.onCreate() mInstanceId[2]
05-21 16:20:46.488: INFO/ServiceSnippet(4143):
ApplicationDemo.onCreate() mInstanceId[3]
=
I have no idea why the onCreate() keeps getting called, and how to
ensure it only happens once. Is this possible? Any ideas?
Regards
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Need help understanding the ContentObserver life-cycle.
I have Call Log Widget on the Android Market:
http://blog.zedray.com/call-log-widget/
The core of this Widget is an AppWidgetProvider which registers a
ContentObserver to the CallLog content URI. This means that my widget
is updated every time a call (incoming, outgoing, missed) is
recorded. This works fine for a while, until *something happens* and
my ContentObserver stops getting called (no error message seen in
trace). I would rather that this ContentObserver persisted until the
user removes the Widget.
I am guessing that my JVM has been destroyed (due to low memory?),
ContentObserver garbage collected and/or ContentObserver unregistered
(or just pointing to nothing), but I don't know how to debug this
without restarting my code (and thereby re-registering).
I can hide this bug by periodically re-registering my Content
provider, but I would rather understand the cause and have a more
optimal solution.
Feedback appreciated.
Mark
### Code snippet ###
public class CallLogWidgetProvider extends AppWidgetProvider {
/** Making this static is an attempt to prevent duplicate
ContentObserver registrations. **/
private static CallObserver sCallObserver;
/** Method called by onEnabled() and onUpdate(). **/
private void registerCallObserver(Context context) {
if (sCallObserver == null) {
sCallObserver = new CallObserver(null,
context.getApplicationContext());
context.getContentResolver().registerContentObserver(CallLog.Calls.CONTENT_URI,
true, sCallObserver);
}
}
private class CallObserver extends ContentObserver {
private Context mContext;
public CallObserver(Handler handler, Context context) {
super(handler);
mContext = context;
}
@Override
public void onChange(boolean b) {
/** Update all widgets due to a change in content. **/
callOnUpdate(mContext);
}
//... widget code ...
}
### Code snippet ###
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Need help understanding the ContentObserver life-cycle.
Ah, BroadcastReceiver - ACTION_PHONE_STATE_CHANGED. That's the sort of life-cycle I was looking for. :-D Thanks Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Problem updating widget in emulator
Genius, I'd never have figured that one out! (just had the same issue testing http://blog.zedray.com/call-log-widget/) Thanks for closing your own question. Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Using Flurry with a Widget
Has anyone had any luck using Flurry with a home screen widget? What I want to do is tap into the onEnabled and onDisabled life- cycle methods, so I know how long at least one of the widgets has been installed on the home screen. The problem here is that the widget does not maintain the same context between these two calls, and (if well designed) shouldn't spend much time being in memory at all. My widget is triggered repeatedly by the AlarmManager and does the UI within the permitted time span of the BroadcastReceiver. This is extremely efficient from a saving battery perspective(AlarmManager can be configured not to wake up the device), but may not be giving Flurry enough scope to report back usage data over the network. I have no idea how Flurry have implemented this functionality? Hence I am seeing incorrect session length values in my Flurry reports, i.e. Flurry is reporting 3-10 seconds (probably the time it takes to initialise my widget) and not the time the widget spends being shown on the home screen (in this example several days). Unfortunately Flurry have locked down their own forums, and are not returning my support emails. :-( As Flurry reports are delayed, this is very difficult to debug. Does anyone know if this kind of tracking is this possible? Would it help if I spun up a service or cached the context (i.e. leak some memory)? Could anyone suggest another usage tracking tool that supports Android Home screen widgets? Regards Mark I'm blogging this: http://blog.zedray.com/2010/04/24/using-flurry-with-a-android-home-screen-widget/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: what's the best 2d engine and what's the tools I need to create a game?
If you want to see how its done, suggest you look here: Replica Island is a free, open-source game for Android. http://replicaisland.net/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
[android-developers] Re: Develop Android app using J2ME Polish
Polish is designed to save you from most of the pain of writing a good looking app in J2Me. However Android is a modern OS with it's own UI framework, so you should only consider it if you have a very great need to support Java phones. If you want to support more users, consider building a web app instead. Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Re: Same servicein multiple APKs, only want best one to launch
I already had this discussion and was able to put together a workable solution. I bloged it here: http://tinyurl.com/9hwdva Regards Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
[android-developers] Device bug: Data SMS not received on Samsung Galaxy
Background:A code contained in a Data SMS is required to authenticate the MSISDN of the device running our product. Bug: When I receive a data SMS on the Samsung Galaxy, the Intent “android.intent.action.DATA_SMS_RECEIVED” is not thrown and the Data SMS arrives in the Inbox as a blank text message. Any data contained in the Data SMS seems to be lost once it arrives in the Inbox. I have filed this bug here: http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=4018 I have made a little app to test this functionality. It detects the MSISDN (not working on many devices) or lets you enter it, and then send either a Data SMS or a Text Message. The app will then display any incoming Data or Text SMSs by the intent they throw and allow you to interrogate the native Inbox to determine what data was saved. http://tinyurl.com/y8jspgv -- Info http://tinyurl.com/yannsxb -- ZIP source + APK Is there any known workaround for this situation? Regards Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Developer review of all Android (Cupcake) devices - HTC vs. Samsung, test cases, etc.
Hi Android Developers I am doing a developer centric review of all the Android devices currently available (retail) and have documented some technical differences on my blog: http://blog.zedray.com/2009/08/22/android-cupcake-hardware-review/ I am now working on individual device reviews, and was wondering if anyone could point out some of the differences they’ve noticed between devices, so I can write some useful test cases. So far I have noticed differences with the flip out keyboard, virtual keyboard height, MSISDN detection, SMS Capture, etc, but I would be interested in anything that would make an application perform differently on another device. I want this to be a useful resource for all the developers, particularly for the kind of people who keep asking me which Android device they should buy. Regards Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android service always alive..
Maybe this is what you're looking for: Its not clear from the documentation the difference between startService() and bindService(). If you just bind to a service, the service will be killed after your activity calls unbind. If you call startService(), then it will (more or less) keep running regardless. It's very easy to leak services that way, which is a bug everybody should be watching out for! Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: SurfaceView to slow for games? OpenGL necessary to do games?
Some phones implement this functionality in hardware, others in software. Here is a tutorial I found recently: http://sites.google.com/site/drpaulthomasandroidstuff/Home/voxel-fun/how-it-works --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: DEVELOPER CHALLENGE 2 - Can suite of applications participate as one entry?
I had this issue in ADC1 and was forced to put all my apps into the same APK, although by configuring the manifest.xml file I was still able to make each application show up with an individual icon. However, due to the commoditized nature of the competition, the judge doe’s not follow the normal user lifecycle (install, open, play, uninstall), so an Android style “federation” of apps is at a huge disadvantage to the traditional single app model. I don’t think there is much Google can do to change this, so I suggest that you rethink your submission idea early on to take this into account. Regards Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: I must pay 25$ to distribute a FREEWARE on Android Market
Distribution of apps (even free ones) over the Android Market isn’t free for Google. Worst case: why don’t you just ask someone else to distribute the app on your behalf? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Confused about handling SSL Errors in WebView
Hi Manuel So far no luck. I'm sure any solution will involved the SslErrorHandler class, but I have so far failed to find any post 1.0 example code. http://developer.android.com/reference/android/webkit/SslErrorHandler.html --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: IMPROPER RENDERING OF A HTML OBJECT
I’ve just encountered the same problem. Below is a code snippet which defines a DIV element, light blue in colour and of limited height. This height/overflow setting caused a scrollbar to appear on all the desktop browsers tested. In the Android Browser, no scrollbar is shown and content after the 10th line is cropped. I am testing on a ADP 1.0 device. I will now see if anyone has previously reported this as a bug. Regards Mark !—SNIPPIT -- html headtitleScroll Test/title/head body h3Scroll Test START/h3 div style=height: 180px; overflow:auto; background-color: #66; 1yyy1br 2yyy2br 3yyy3br 4yyy4br 5yyy5br 6yyy6br 7yyy7br 8yyy8br 9yyy9br 0br 1yyy1br 2yyy2br 3yyy3br 4yyy4br 5yyy5br 6yyy6br 7yyy7br 8yyy8br 9yyy9br 0br 1yyy1br 2yyy2br 3yyy3br 4yyy4br 5yyy5br 6yyy6br 7yyy7br 8yyy8br 9yyy9br 0br /div h3Scroll Test END/h3 /body /html !—SNIPPIT -- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: IMPROPER RENDERING OF A HTML OBJECT
Added as a bug report here: http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=2044can=1q=htmlcolspec=ID%20Type%20Version%20Security%20Status%20Owner%20Summarystart=100 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Confused about handling SSL Errors in WebView
I have a WebView and I want to capture an error, most likely related to a web page having an invalid SSL certificate (company Intranet). Currently the MyWebViewClient.onPageStarted() method is called, and no secure content is shown the the page. Generally I would expect WebViewClient.onReceivedError() to be called to handle this situation, although the documentation is not quite clear on exactly what kind of errors this method covers. Looking at the Android Browser implementation source code, it seems to call WebViewClient.onReceivedSslError() on line 2954, which triggers the relevant site certificate prompt: http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/packages/apps/Browser.git;a=blob;f=src/com/android/browser/BrowserActivity.java ...which of course is a method that was removed in 0.9: http://code.google.com/android/migrating/m5-0.9/changes/android.webkit.WebViewClient.html I am not clued up enough to take on the WebKit source and can't find any documentation on what if anything has replaced the onReceivedSslError() method. Is this a bug/omission in the Android platform? How was the release-1.0 browser complied with missing classes? Am I doing something completely wrong? Thanks in advance for your feedback. Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Sending SMS using Messaging app - with filled in To: field
Thanks to the wonders of open source
* ACTION_VIEW Specification taken from Android source code
com.android.mms.ui.ComposeMessageActivity.initActivityState()
* See line numbers between 2999 to 3004 in v1.0
*
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/packages/apps/Mms.git;a=blob;f=src/com/android/mms/ui/ComposeMessageActivity.java
*
* KNOWN BUG: Android only supports a single recipient, comma
separated lists are invalid
*/
public Intent getSmsIntent() {
Intent intent = new Intent(Intent.ACTION_VIEW);
if (recipient != null) {
intent.putExtra(address, recipient);
} else {
return null;
}
if (body != null) {
intent.putExtra(sms_body, body);
}
intent.setType(vnd.android-dir/mms-sms);
return intent;
}
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android Bug/Architectural Issue: How do I handle multiple versions of my own Content Provider?
Thanks for the additional feedback. The meta data name is a global namespace to all applications, so you must qualify it… That’s how I understood it. “myComponentNamespace” is a shortened camel case to represent a full application namespace. I renamed all my code to anonymize our client and make my point easier to follow. For example, my provider authority of “myComponentNamespace.theirApplicaitonNamespace” is something like “com.myclientscompany.example.projectname.platform.component.com.thirdpartycompany.applicationname”. Thanks for pointing at the actual documentation, as it was sort of buried. Usually they rely on the standard permission mechanism, though you can do more complicated stuff if you want. The standard permission mechanism is great for protecting the user from bad applications, but not helpful for protecting an application from a bad user. I will have to look at this in more detail when I find myself implementing something that needs to be secure. Regards Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android Bug/Architectural Issue: How do I handle multiple versions of my own Content Provider?
Thanks for the additional feedback.
Peli - Probably you should not mis-use getType()…
I originally choose getType() for simplicity (URI in - String out),
but I will now use query() instead. However, as my application is not
compatible with any other software (i.e. my data exchange has no MIME
type), I would be interested if anyone could provide a concrete
example of where an inappropriate getType() response might cause
problems.
Also, for simplicity I am not using intents.
Dianne Hackborn - ...Along those same lines, looking for your own special
text in the authority to identify content providers you are going to work
with is also kind-of screwy. Typically how we do this is attach meta-data to
the component that whoever is interested in identifying specifically tagged
components looks for. Look at the way input method service components are
discovered in Cupcake as an example.
Here is a small component discovery rewrite, now using meta-data to
mark valid Content Providers:
AndroidManifest.xml
provider
android:name=test.TheirContentProvider
android:authorities=myComponentNamespace.theirApplicaitonNamespace
meta-data android:name=type android:value=myComponentNamespace/
/provider
Java Code
ListProviderInfo pis = androidContext.getPackageManager
().queryContentProviders(null, 0, PackageManager.GET_META_DATA);
...
for(ProviderInfo pi:pis) {
Bundle md = pi.metaData;
if (md != null
md.getString(type) != null
md.getString(type).equals(myComponentNamespace)) {
//Congratulations you have now found a valid Content Provider
//Note: keep looking as you might find more
}
}
The upside of this is that the application developer can now deploy my
Content Provider using any URI namespace they choose. However, I will
still recommend the previous naming scheme to prevent damaging naming
conflicts.
Dianne Hackborn - …Also, have you thought about security at all? What kind
of information is stored on the content provider? Who can access it?
As I understand it, any cross application Content Provider on Android
needs to implement its own (i.e. roll-your-own) security solution when
handling incoming requests.
My current application (an advertising server) treats this as an open/
free to use API, with risk scenarios being managed mainly on the
server side.
My next application (component for peer-to-peer data sharing) will
require a custom Android Permission for sending data. This is similar
to the “android.permission.INTERNET” permission whereby the user still
gets a say as to whether the application can send data off the phone.
I am not yet confident enough in the security capabilities of Android
and/or my knowledge of them, to implement an application that handles
confidential data.
Regards
Mark
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android Bug/Architectural Issue: How do I handle multiple versions of my own Content Provider?
Solution
The simplest solution (not using intents) is to instruct each user of
my component to define a new content provider:
content://myComponentNamespace.theirApplicaitonNamespace
Android lets me search through all available content providers, which
can be string matched to my own component namespace.
context.getPackageManager().queryContentProviders(null, 0, 0);
If I find more than one valid Content Provider I can then pass around
Synchronisation information (validity, compatibility, version, status,
etc) using any of the ContentProvider class methods (I used getType
()).
The only problem with this approach is that the application developer
who imports my component (as a JAR) will have to define their own
custom Content Provider. This is done by extending the
MyComponentContentProvider class (from my JAR) and defining a
CONTENT_URI variable.
package test;
import com.whitemice.MyComponentContentProvider;
public class TheirContentProvider extends MyComponentContentProvider {
public static final Uri CONTENT_URI =
Uri.parse( content://
myComponentNamespace.theirApplicaitonNamespace);
}
As well as adding the custom provider to the Android manifest.
provider
android:name=test.TheirContentProvider
android:authorities=test.service.TestContentProvider.TestAndroidContentProvider
/
Without the custom Content Provider configuration, Android will behave
strangely and sometimes call a different .APK file if it has a class
in it with the same name.
As this is a work time project, I will have to check if I can release
the synchronisation code as a working example. If I do it will appear
on my blog here:
http://tinyurl.com/9hwdva
Regards
Mark
P.S. Thanks again everyone for your suggestions.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android Bug/Architectural Issue: How do I handle multiple versions of my own Content Provider?
Thanks everyone for the replies: Just to clarify: I am writing an advertising server component at the moment, but other projects that I have in the pipeline essentially have the same requirement. Dianne Hackborn - As far as naming issues, this is why you should use an authority in a namespace/domain you own, so that there will not be naming collisions. My application sits in its own namespace. I am only having conflicts with different copies of the same Content Provider Component being installed with different applications. Dianne Hackborn - …any client app that is relying on a component that is not part of the base platform needs to deal with the error cases if that component does not exist. If the component is not there, then the application would show an error on start and normally refuse to run. Result: Bad user experience. Peli - Hm, I think you end up with unnecessary code duplication if you include your component / content provider in every application. This isn’t an issue, as my component is delivered as a small Java class included with the main application. When activated, the component inflates in size as it downloads content over the internet. My goal is to manage this process by having only one component activated regardless of how many applications are installed on the device. Peli - I think it would be better if every application that wants to use your component shows a small dialog You need to install the following component... with a button that brings you to the download page of the Market for your component... Catching a missing component is easy enough. It’s just that what you describe adds up to a bad user experience: - No user will download a 3rd party advertising server (or any non- core functionality) just to run a game. - Installation is already a convoluted process and should only take place once. Additional APK installations require more downloading, application permission settings, button pressing, confusion, etc. - No client of mine will accept a solution that asks the user to jump through any additional hoops (e.g. even the Android Developer Challenge only permitted a single executable). Peli - At OpenIntents we try to resolve dependencies as late as possible - i.e. not at installation time, but the first time the user actually wants to use a particular feature (they may never use it in which case there is no need to install it). This doesn’t work for me as ad funded Applications generally require my component to be available on startup. Peli - I think in the long run Market should have better tools for resolving compulsory dependencies automatically, but for the moment I think this is a good compromise for developers and end users. I agree that this needs to be improved, as there is currently no support for components (downloading, versioning, upgrading, etc) in Android or on the Android Market. Hence I am trying to get around this issue by “managing” a Content Provider. Dianne Hackborn - Oh wait if what is being talked about is having the same content provider in multiple applications, that is completely the wrong approach. For a given authority there must be one and only one content provider implementation, living in a single specific .apk. This is how it’s done at the moment, i.e. Android will log a warning (and do nothing) every time an application tries to register a Content Provider URI that’s already in use. This means that subsequent applications will be broken (and need to be reinstalled) if the original Content Provider is ever uninstalled. I don’t seem to be able to reregister a missing Content Provider URI at runtime. Muthu Ramadoss - AFAIK, a Content Provider is tied up to a unique Authority. If you want to support multiple URI's you do so accordingly by providing different URI paths using the same authority. I explored this approach initially, but it still has the following problem: Over time, I release a number of versions of my component that other developers subsequently integrate into their own applications. My component uses the following URI conventions: content://mynamespace.mycomponentnamespace.version1/ content://mynamespace.mycomponentnamespace.version2/ content://mynamespace.mycomponentnamespace.version3/ Android allows me to search and interrogate each URI to check the status of each Content Provider (allowing me to version my component). This is fine until v3 of my component becomes really popular and a user installs five games on their phone, each with the same component trying to register the same URI. The user then gets bored of the first game and uninstalls it, thereby breaking all the other games that rely on the Content Provider that it contains. As URIs are set at install time, none of the other games will work until the user reinstalls an existing game or downloads a new one - This is a terrible user experience. Regards Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received
[android-developers] Re: Android Bug/Architectural Issue: How do I handle multiple versions of my own Content Provider?
Peli - Indeed, for an advertising server, it makes more sense to include that in every application separately, for the reasons you mentioned. I could suggest the following…and all applications can access that one content provider. Would this sound like a suitable solution? I didn’t think of just doing the synchronisation using intents (as they support a one-to-many relationship between components). I’ll do a proof of concept on Monday to see if this works. It’ll be a bit of a hassle for the guy who has to incorporate this into their application, but it will do until Android is improved to support components. ;-) Thank you kindly!! Mark Murphy - Since the content in question is going on /sdcard (right? right?!?), solve the problem by managing the space, not managing the components. Since you already require each application to have your own code anyway, just use a regular Java class to access the /sdcard data store and dump the ContentProvider interface. Peli - Ad images and banners should be placed on the SD card, but private data for accounting (number of times an ad had been shown, click- through-rate, last ad shown, etc.) could be stored in a content provider, and it makes sense to share this content provider among several applications installed (e.g. so that the end user is not presented the same ad in every application they launch). While Mark Murphy’s solution could be made to work, communicating outside of the OS would be quite ugly in terms of the security and the hardware assumptions which would need to be made. I also expect the security regime and file permissions to morph somewhat over the next couple of Android releases, potentially breaking my OS bypass hack. I’ll put this idea down as a plan B, thanks anyway!! I think I have enough ideas to get this to work now, and will post my results to the thread and blog early next week. Thank you Android Developers. :-D Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Android Bug/Architectural Issue: How do I handle multiple versions of my own Content Provider?
I’ve blogged this question with pictures here: http://tinyurl.com/9hwdva I am writing a component that makes certain functionality available to any application running on an Android device (e.g. an advertising service, stock ticker cache, Snowball server, etc). This functionality is useful for application developers, but not interesting to actual users i.e. my component should be included as part of a new application, but not require the end user to explicitly install the additional component themselves. I expect that over time multiple applications installed on the phone will want to communicate with my component. As each new application will have a different certificate, I want to communicate between applications using an Android Content Provider. To save resources on the device (networking, caching, etc) only one instance of my component should be appointed to handle all queries. This works well as Android only registers the first Content Provider for a given URI and then ignores the rest (throwing an “WARN/ PackageManager: Skipping provider name name already used” error each time a new one is installed). However if the registered Content Provider is uninstalled, it will immediately break all the other applications that rely on it, even though other instances of the component still exist. Questions: - Does anyone have any suggestions on how to better handle this situation? - If I could reregister Content Providers I could handle situations like this, and upgrade components when newer versions are installed. Perhaps the Android OS could also handle this situation better, by tracking Content Provider naming collisions? - Should I be looking at other communication methods to solve this issue? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Working example of CrossProcessCursor?
Solved
Use a MatrixCursor instead of a CrossProcessCursor.
This will allow you to send custom data in a Cursor object over a
ContentProvider, and works across the process boundary.
Example code:
public class TestContentProvider extends ContentProvider {
public Cursor query(Uri uri, String[] arg1, String selection, String
[] selectionArgs, String sortOrder) {
String[] columnNames = new String[2];
columnNames[0] = col1;
columnNames[1] = col2;
MatrixCursor cursor = new MatrixCursor(columnNames);
String[] columnValues = new String[2];
columnValues[0] = ServiceName;
columnValues[1] = 2;
cursor.addRow(columnValues);
return cursor;
}
...other required methods..
}
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Working example of CrossProcessCursor?
bump So correct me if I am wrong, but the only Cursors that can be sent across a process boundary are the ones created by SQLite? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Working example of CrossProcessCursor?
Can anyone point me at a working example of CrossProcessCursor? I am trying to create a custom object and pass it to another process over a content provider. My code works fine inside the same process, but I get a CursorIndexOutOfBoundsException(AbstractCursor.java:559) when I try to access the content provider from another Package. Somehow the “mPos” variable is getting reset to -1 when going cross process, but I don’t yet understand the internals enough to solve this. Thanks for the help Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Fw: [android-developers] Re: Android and bluetooth
Hi Nick I can see there is a use case for this. If we were to do this, it would be through a scary sounding bluetooth permission. This application can connect to untrusted Bluetooth devics. We'll have to think about this a little. I would do it this way: (1) Application permission: This application can connect to any untrusted Bluetooth device without asking your permission. (2) To get this to work the user must manually activate Bluetooth, and then select an extra check box for Bluetooth Ad Hoc communication (seeing another scary warning) in the Bluetooth settings. The user is then shown a list of currently installed applications that make use of this feature, having to activate (or disable) this feature for each individual application. It would be the responsibility of application developer to detect when this feature is disabled, and then guide the user towards the Bluetooth settings panel. (3) Make the Android market a website, and make it searchable by permission. This would allow the community to find and strike down applications that misuse this capability. I think this would be enough hoops for the user to jump through while keeping the user in control, and making it more secure than existing Symbian Bluetooth implementations. The first step is to get any Bluetooth API out. Let me work on that first :) I’ve used enough bad Bluetooth stacks to know not to ask you to hurry ;-) …But you can put me down as a vested interest if you require some outside validation in this area. Thanks for listening Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Fw: [android-developers] Re: Android and bluetooth
Hi Nick While we are on the subject, I am looking for Android *Ad-hoc* Bluetooth support. Example: Alice and Bob both have my client running on their phones, and walk within Bluetooth range of each other in a social setting. I want the application to: (a) Be able to detect the other Bluetooth phone in the room (b) Detect that the same application is running on the other phone (c) Create a data connection between the two phones without asking for the user’s permission (permission is granted beforehand). Is this considered a security problem, or will this kind of thing be allowed in the new API? Some more info on what I am doing…. http://blog.zedray.com/snowball/ Regards Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Fw: [android-developers] Re: Android and bluetooth
Hi Nick Thanks for getting back to me. We are likely to prevent Bluetooth data connections (RFCOMM) from apps unless the two phones have been paired. It's really hard to make security work any other way. Right, so none of these Symbian apps are possible on Android… Nokia Sensor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_Sensor) Bedd (http://www.bedd.com) FluidNexus (http://www.inclusiva-net.es/fluidnexus/) Imity (http://imity.com/pocket-radar) etc… How about creating a separate permission for ad-hoc Bluetooth networking? …or making it user configurable? Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: T-mobile G1 for testing purposes
This could be FUD, as the G1 is reported to have “quad-band GSM plus dual-band UMTS, which means it will work abroad [i.e. outside US] as well“. It turns out that 3G standards are a bit complex: http://www.three-g.net/3g_standards.html Although I do use a T-Mobile Germany laptop PCMCIA 3G card (presumably UMTS), and the connection speeds aren’t that bad: http://www.3gnewsroom.com/3g_news/feb_06/news_6661.shtml Could someone who knows comment on this? (I.e. how well a US or even UK optimised unlocked G1 would work in my country) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: T-mobile G1 for testing purposes
I am a T-Mobile customer/Android developer living in Germany, and we have been promised a device sometime in Q1/2009 (after USA, then UK). As it takes 90 days to get an officially locked T-Mobile USA device, I am assuming that all unlocked G1’s currently listed on eBay are fake. I am also unsure of how well a device apparently *optimised* for T- Mobile USA 3G frequencies will perform on my local network. Ironically, for such a developer centric device, they are starving the community of phones: e.g. http://www.biggu.com/2008/10/23/t-mobile-says-no-g1-for-you/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: Android Specialists
No one *really* supports Android yet as there are no actual devices to deploy against. However many developers who entered the Android Developer Challenge have real mobile-software-development day jobs and are looking forward to the first Android projects to walk in the door. What sort of thing did you have in mind? Mark --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: 16M Memory Limit
That’s a relief! Can you comment on whether the community will see another Android SDK before the APIs are finalised in 1.0? I know the UI is supposed to be a *big surprise*, but there are so many other APIs that us regular developers would love to give feedback on. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: 16M Memory Limit
OK, thanks for giving feedback. Perhaps someone else from Google (who is more in the know) could throw in a comment? All this silence from Google regarding the SDK is making us developers nervous. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[android-developers] Re: 16M Memory Limit
...On top of this, by the time Android is fully loaded on a 64MB device only 10-20MB of RAM will probably remain.* So, essentially your application would use all system resources... 640K ought to be enough for anybody - Bill Gates (apparently) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Android Developers group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
