Re: [AOLSERVER] apology
On Monday 21 April 2008, Rusty Brooks wrote: Plus I think there's basically no one else. I'd say 90% of the AOLServer expertise in the world is contained in this list. That might be a conservative estimate. This list plus the OpenACS community plus the naviserver fork's lists likely contain 100% of the AOLserver expertise. This is also the busiest this list has been in a long time. While I no longer run OpenACS in production, I do still have several AOLserver installs going strong. Some of them are AOLserver 2.3. Yes, AOLserver is just that stable; those servers have been running over ten years and are still getting active (internal) use. -- Lamar Owen www.pari.edu -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
Re: [AOLSERVER] nspostgres-4.1 released
On Wednesday 05 September 2007, Jim Lynch wrote: Lamar, Thanks for testing, thanks for the success report and the shout out :) Sure. I'm glad somebody decided to pick it up; I've not run OpenACS is some time now, and really didn't have the need or time to further maintain the PostgreSQL driver. -- Lamar Owen Chief Information Officer Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
[AOLSERVER] AOLserver 2.3 tcl code.
You know, with all the toolkits out there, no one has done as good of a job as AOLserver 2 did for ad hoc database queries and forms. Is there any chance of seeing this code from this ancient but worthy version open-sourced (I think I asked once before five or six years ago, but don't remember the answer)? I have a client where a large part of teh app is using the ad hoc forms, and, frankly, it JUST WORKS. Works well, works reliably, and just works. They don't need anything more fancy. But they do need something more modern that can run on a later OS and use a later database. It shouldn't take much work to make this work with AOLserver 4. This client neither wants nor needs OpenACS for this simple of a task. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
Re: [AOLSERVER] does aolserver run on IBM server
On Friday 01 December 2006 13:12, Iuri Sampaio wrote: I’d like to know if it’s possible to install aolserver on a IBM S390 generation 5 without pain. I have this mainframe and I’m not quite sure if it’s safe to have aolserver on it What OS are you running on your s390? I have a surplus s390 here, but haven't tried to build AOLserver on it. It's running Linux. With the stock s390 OS's, there should be no problem whatsoever; you are not at all likely to crash VM with a userspace app. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
[AOLSERVER] Archiv on old AOLserver version.
Ok, I'm going to ask a stupid question. I have inherited a server at a site that is still running AOLserver 2.3.3 on it, and one that heavily uses the ad hoc query funtions and templates. I needed to reinstall 2.3.3 on a virtual machine on CentOS 2.1 hosted using VMware on CentOS4. So I'm looking for an archive of the old ftp.aolserver.com; does anyone have such a beast? I wish the source for 2.x had been released; it would make a number of things much simpler. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
Re: [AOLSERVER] oacs pg driver for aolserver 4
On Thursday 03 March 2005 13:16, Dan Chak wrote: And on another note... Will this driver ever be merged with the official postgres driver available on aolserver.com? The 'official' postgres driver is nspostgres in sourceforge/aolserver.com CVS. Please read the Makefile for instructions regarding compiling for OpenACS use. There is only one 'official' nspostgres, and it is based off the OpenACS version with tweaks for AOLserver 4 or AOLserver 3 usage and ACS additions. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu -- Lamar Owen CE WGCR AM 720 and WWW.WGCR.NET Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
[AOLSERVER] Filename Problem, AS 4.0.9.
I was demoing a network install of CentOS 4 for a LUG InstallFest Saturday (installing a server over VNC using an HTTP install) and was hosting the installation repository on an AOLserver 4.0.9 instance (that also happens to be an OpenACS instance, but that shouldn't be an issue, should it?). The installation crashed on one particular RPM, libstdc++-3.4.3-9.EL4.i386.rpm. If you wget http://www.lamarowen.net/files/unpacked/CentOS/RPMS/libstdc++-3.4.3-9.EL4.i386.rpm you will see why; it returns the text 'File Not Found' as the actual file instead of the file (that is actually THERE on the server). AOLserver does NOT return a 404, either. Here is the result of a test: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lowen]$ wget -S http://www.lamarowen.net/files/unpacked/CentOS/RPMS/libstdc++-3.4.3-9.EL4.i386.rpm --11:12:26-- http://www.lamarowen.net/files/unpacked/CentOS/RPMS/libstdc++-3.4.3-9.EL4.i386.rpm = `libstdc++-3.4.3-9.EL4.i386.rpm' Resolving www.lamarowen.net... 192.168.1.246 Connecting to www.lamarowen.net[192.168.1.246]:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 1 HTTP/1.0 200 OK 2 Set-Cookie: ad_session_id=397908%2c0%2c0+%7b101+1109003160+E1D8FB0762E4C636607A23E00CFDD63EFC1EB2F8%7d; Path=/; Max-Age=1200 3 Last-Modified: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:39:48 GMT 4 MIME-Version: 1.0 5 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:06:00 GMT 6 Server: AOLserver/4.0.9 7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 8 Content-Length: 15 9 Connection: keep-alive 100%[=] 15 --.--K/s 11:12:26 (146.48 KB/s) - `libstdc++-3.4.3-9.EL4.i386.rpm' saved [15/15] [EMAIL PROTECTED] lowen]$ cat libstdc++-3.4.3-9.EL4.i386.rpm File not [EMAIL PROTECTED] lowen]$ But: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lowen]$ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] ls -l /var/www/aolserver/ramifordistat/www/files/unpacked/CentOS/RPMS/libstdc++-3.4.3-9.EL4.i386.rpm -r--r--r--1 root root 1197715 Feb 15 16:38 /var/www/aolserver/ramifordistat/www/files/unpacked/CentOS/RPMS/libstdc++-3.4.3-9.EL4.i386.rpm [EMAIL PROTECTED] lowen]$ I had tried updating through yum before on a repository hosted on AOLserver/OpenACS when I was running it on a SPARC box, and had attributed it to being on a SPARC box. But the current lamarowen.net box is Intel. Same thing works fine on a Apache install. Works fine for a different RPM, too: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lowen]$ wget -S http://www.lamarowen.net/files/unpacked/CentOS/RPMS/libsoup-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm --11:31:11-- http://www.lamarowen.net/files/unpacked/CentOS/RPMS/libsoup-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm = `libsoup-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm' Resolving www.lamarowen.net... 192.168.1.246 Connecting to www.lamarowen.net[192.168.1.246]:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 1 HTTP/1.0 200 OK 2 Set-Cookie: ad_session_id=377143%2c0%2c0+%7b760+1109004286+A77AFA5C19A6728FEDC72CCEF9DA310A01EB48B2%7d; Path=/; Max-Age=1200 3 Last-Modified: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 20:18:40 GMT 4 MIME-Version: 1.0 5 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:24:46 GMT 6 Server: AOLserver/4.0.9 7 Content-Type: text/plain 8 Content-Length: 229463 9 Connection: keep-alive 100%[=] 229,463 --.--K/s 11:31:11 (8.43 MB/s) - `libsoup-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm' saved [229,463/229,463] [EMAIL PROTECTED] lowen]$ Any ideas? -- Lamar Owen CE WGCR AM 720 and WWW.WGCR.NET Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
Re: [AOLSERVER] Filename Problem, AS 4.0.9.
On Monday 21 February 2005 12:59, Tom Jackson wrote: On Monday 21 February 2005 09:24, Steve Woodcock wrote: That's the OpenACS request processor standard behaviour for file-not-founds these days. Not sure what version it started doing this in. I've been meaning to fix it on my site and submit a patch but haven't got round to it. If that is the standard behavior, I think my modified directory listing proc (for use with OACS) might work. Well, the standard directory lister DOES show the file in question, but when you click on the link it returns file not found. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu -- Lamar Owen CE WGCR AM 720 and WWW.WGCR.NET Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
Re: [AOLSERVER] Filename Problem, AS 4.0.9.
On Monday 21 February 2005 12:53, Bernd Eidenschink wrote: Looks exactly like bug number 972994, http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=972994group_id=31 52atid=103152 Quote: To reproduce, try to download an RPM package such as: libstdc++-3.3.2-1.i386.rpm. :-) Yeah, looks like. Dossy was chasing that bug last September. Dossy? Is this fixed in 4.0.10? In my case, I can't use the workaround since the http request is being sourced by the anaconda installer itself. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu -- Lamar Owen CE WGCR AM 720 and WWW.WGCR.NET Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver facelift.
On Friday 04 February 2005 16:34, Tom Jackson wrote: C. Working examples of database integration, expecially ODBC and if possible MySQL. Other examples are mentioned as foreign: OACS, for instance. Note that ACS, and OACS are responsible for a large percentage of users, and these projects contributed the oracle driver and the postgres driver. AOL itself has done nothing to advance database integration, and the base nsdb module remains incomplete. If these drivers didn't exist, my interest in this project would be zero (0). Being that I'm one of the ones responsible, let me make it very clear that the current nspostgres driver is a derivative work from the ACS/pg (OpenACS) postgres driver, which is IN TURN a derivative of the original Postgres95 example driver written by Jim Davidson for AOLserver 2.x long long ago. I have been involved in that driver since AOLserver 2.2.1 and PostgreSQL 6.2.1 and tested the beta driver for AS2.2.1 for AOL long long ago (still have the e-mails, too). HOWEVER, the AS 2.x docs were and are much better than anything since. Basically everything you mention, Tom, was addressed fully in the AS2.x docs. I still have the AS2.3.3 doc set somewhere in PDF form. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu -- Lamar Owen CE WGCR AM 720 and WWW.WGCR.NET Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
Re: [AOLSERVER] [DEV] Changing required autoconf version
On Wednesday 21 July 2004 14:40, Dossy wrote: On 2004.07.21, John Caruso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.redhat.com/swr/noarch/autoconf-2.57-3.noarch.html That's a RedHat 9 RPM, not an Advanced Server 2.1 RPM. Excuse my RedHat ignorance, but could you explain the difference? Will this RPM not install on RHAS 2.1 at all? Is it because of unmet dependencies, or something else? RHAS 2.1 is based off of RH 7.2, which is substantially older than RHL9. However, the RHL7.3 version SRPMS should rebuild with little to no problems: see ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/7.3/en/os/i386/SRPMS/autoconf253-2.53-3.src.rpm for the source rpm to feed rpmbuild --rebuild. The 7.3 RPM itself might install with no problems on RHAS2.1. The advantages of this RPM is that it can coexist with the 2.13 version; you call it as autoconf-253 instead of just autoconf (I've had to deal with this with PostgreSQL). -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
Re: [AOLSERVER] new DB API? Re: [ aolserver-Bugs-474556 ]
On Tuesday 29 June 2004 06:54, Dossy wrote: The design is in progress and under discussion -- limited to the people who I chat with on a regular basis. I'm working on it, in my spare time. So, this time around, I'm just going to keep quiet, work on it, and when it's done, I'll release it. Then, people can give real and concrete feedback about something that really exists ... Jim and I had a short discussion a few years back about a potential new DB API. However, can you clarify exactly *which* DB API you are talking about? Is this the driver API, or the user-exposed API? What do you think will be needed to be changed in the database drivers themselves? The comments I remember seeing you make were mostly the user-exposed API portions, but I would kindof like to know, since I will need to rewrite/modify nspostgres accordingly. As to the user-exposed API, I really think the low-level OpenACS API (not the .xql stuff, but the level below that) is a pretty good model. But that's one of those 'everyone has a different opinion' items :-) One of the items on my wishlist is a callback into the driver if the connection is dropped on the HTTP side, so that I can abort an in-process transaction or statement. I have an open bug on this topic; however, I have not found a way from within the driver to address this issue. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
[AOLSERVER] Mention of AOLserver in Feb 2004 Linux Journal.
There is a good, if inconspicuous, mention of AOLserver in the Feb LJ. On page 46, in the feature on the Magnatune record label, the statement is made: Apache 2 running PHP and OpenSSL serves all the HTML pages. When Magnatune was Slashdotted, I found that Apache could not keep up with the load for images. All HTTP image requests now are off-loaded to AOLserver, which had the lowest latency to serve images at high speeds. Later: Mathopd [which they use to serve the very large streaming audio files] has more latency than AOLserver, which is why we don't use it to serve small images. Wow, somebody who really uses the right tool for each job. Apache for the HTML and PHP stuff, AOLserver for machine-gunning images out, and Mathopd for serving very large files at high speeds. But it is a NICE mention of AOLserver. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
Re: [AOLSERVER] Postgresql Schema Support
On Friday 03 October 2003 01:47 pm, Jon Griffin wrote: Does the PG driver support the schema additions to PG 7.3? I can't seem to make it work. Hmmm. I'll have to check to see what will be required. Hadn't thought about that one... -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body of SIGNOFF AOLSERVER in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4
On Thursday 05 June 2003 22:28, Don Baccus wrote: The implementation in AOLserver 4 is very, very different. The script is executed then the ENTIRE set of namespaces and procs are saved to the server's tcl.script pointer. Argh! One EVIL side effect of this is that some of the standard ns_* Tcl API is implemented in Tcl, in some cases using global variables. So, for instance, I have a test case in which the following code: The other side effect (that we've been seeing complained about lately) is related to the following in acs-tcl: 00-database-procs-oracle.tcl:global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs-oracle.tcl:global db_state 00-database-procs-oracle.tcl:global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs-oracle.tcl:global env 00-database-procs-oracle.tcl:global env 00-database-procs-postgresql.tcl:global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs-postgresql.tcl:global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs-postgresql.tcl:global db_state 00-database-procs-postgresql.tcl:global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs-postgresql.tcl:global tcl_platform 00-database-procs-postgresql.tcl:global errorCode 00-database-procs.tcl:global db_state 00-database-procs.tcl: global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs.tcl: global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs.tcl:global db_state 00-database-procs.tcl:global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs.tcl: global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs.tcl: global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs.tcl:global db_state 00-database-procs.tcl: global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs.tcl: global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs.tcl: global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs.tcl: global errorInfo errorCode 00-database-procs.tcl:global db_state 00-database-procs.tcl:global db_state 00-database-procs.tcl:# global db_state(handles) is a list of handles that have been allocated. 00-database-procs.tcl:# global db_state(n_handles_used) is the number of handles in this list that are Methinks this could have bad side-effects, particularly if a thread without a pool and without handles executes ns_eval. The next invocation of any of the db_* API could produce the uninitialized pool result 'nsdb0' (I knew I remembered that from somewhere -- I've seen the nsdb0 result before when a pool wasn't properly initialized (way back when the PostgreSQL driver was being beta tested for PostgreSQL 6.2.1, and AOLserver was at 2.2)). Maybe I'm wrong, but I did trace through all of that code, and the only way I could see ns_pg_bind getting passed a table name of nsdb0 was through something external to the thread changing the global state variable 'db_state'. Now maybe I'm not grokking it correctly, but the proc 'db_with_handle' is mixing state between a global and an nsv (through a call to db_nth_pool_name, which uses the nsv 'db_available_pools'). Again, maybe I'm off-base a little, but I went through the code the other day (after Mohan's report of a driver issue, which isn't really a driver issue) and determined that the code paths in AOLserver 3.x and AOLserver 4.x for pool creation, handle availability and creation, and the various data structures between the database driver, the pool API, and the handle API hadn't changed in a significant way. But this behavior of ns_eval could explain that problem, depending upon the timing of its execution, as well as where the ns_eval was used. So, when a patch for OpenACS that doesn't use ns_eval is ready, those of you who have problems with the nsdb0 stuff, if yu could please determine whether the elimination of ns_eval fixes it. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
Re: [AOLSERVER] ns_eval is EVIL in AOLserver 4
On Friday 06 June 2003 11:50, Don Baccus wrote: On Friday 06 June 2003 08:12 am, Lamar Owen wrote: The other side effect (that we've been seeing complained about lately) is related to the following in acs-tcl I didn't bother mentioning these because I thought pointing out the problem with ns_getform would get people's attention :) Excellent point. I just wanted to correlate, since the driver was initially questioned. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
Re: [AOLSERVER] [ aolserver-Feature Requests-746579 ] Server instance controller process
On Saturday 31 May 2003 20:03, Tom Jackson wrote: Andrew Piskorski wrote: Zoran, I disagree. Me too! It sounds like a more native way of controlling the process. I can't count the number of cases of reported failure to properly install and setup daemontools to work. Zoran, if votes count, I vote that your patch be integrated (possibly as a configure option. --with-controller-process or something). I like this simple, easy, native method that doesn't require any other work. Nice. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
Re: [AOLSERVER] postgres_driver: cannot connect to localhost:80:test
On Thursday 29 May 2003 10:06, Tom Brown wrote: The offending line from the server configuration file was originally ns_param datasource HOSTNAME:PORT:database_name. It didn't work either. Was the syntax wrong? Or the variables not defined? How do you know to use port 5432? The PORT in the datasource parameter is the port number postmaster is listening to. In the default case that's 5432. The variables weren't defined, since you could have a large web site pulling data from multiple database servers, on multiple postmasters (ports), and multiple database names. That _used_ to be in the documentation -- but it's been a long time since I've looked (a long time in this instance means five years or more, since I last needed that information in 1997 for AOLserver 2.2.1). I can, however, put that information (along with much needed general updates) in the README file in the nspostgres distribution. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
[AOLSERVER] nsdb0 handle and id (Was: Re: [AOLSERVER] postgres driver problem)
On Thursday 29 May 2003 06:38, Mohan Pakkurti wrote: I am trying to use the postgres driver with aolserver 4.0 and get the following error. Does this make any sense? Is this some know bug? :) The same code works ok with aolserver3. Ok, this error is occuring during initialization of OpenACS. Can you send the nsd.tcl file that belongs to this? Jonathan Ellis reported a similar problem. In his case, opening nscp, and executing ns_db gethandle returned nsdb0. I don't think it's a driver problem. But I'm looking into it. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
Re: [AOLSERVER] nsdb0 handle and id (Was: Re: [AOLSERVER] postgres driver problem)
On Thursday 29 May 2003 18:57, tammy wrote: I think this is an OACS issue... see http://openacs.org/forums/message-view?message_id=94201 and related http://openacs.org/forums/message-view?message%5fid=94977 H. So, Jonathan and Mohan, update to AOLserver 4b8 and Tcl 8.4.3 and see if the error remain. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
Re: [AOLSERVER] nsdb0 handle and id (Was: Re: [AOLSERVER] postgres driver problem)
On Thursday 29 May 2003 19:03, Vinod Kurup wrote: On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 06:29 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: Ok, this error is occuring during initialization of OpenACS. Can you I was getting a similar error, documented in this thread: http://openacs.org/forums/message-view?message_id=94201 Interesting. Your log is from Oracle, not PostgreSQL, thus vindicating the driver... :-) However, it seems that if ns_eval is causing this, then something is awry with ns_eval somewhere. The pool name is gleaned from an nsv, though. Which beta first had the nsv fix? -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
Re: [AOLSERVER] postgres_driver: cannot connect to localhost:80:test
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 22:46, Tom Brown wrote: Getting a postgres driver error. Can't connect. Appears not able to find server and db. Tail of aolserver log below. 2 [-conn0-] Error: Ns_PgOpenDb(postgres_driver): Could not connect to localhost:80:test: could not connect to server: No such file or directory Use localhost:5432:test, not localhost:80:test for your datasource. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
Re: [AOLSERVER] nspostgres driver on Debian won't make
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 13:10, Tom Brown wrote: As a consequence I am having difficulty installing nspostgres. I just finished one round of altering the Makefile ($NSHOME path) which helped overcome several can't find file or directory type errors. Here is the current roadblock. nspostgres.h:45: libpq-fe.h: No such file or directory Make sure 'postgresql-dev' is installed. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
Re: [AOLSERVER] mod_aolserver
On Thursday 03 April 2003 11:50, Nathan Folkman wrote: Speaking of Apache... Anyone know what happened to mod_aolserver? Can someone point me to a place where I can get the source? Thanks! http://eveander.com/arsdigita/free-tools/mod_aolserver Up as of two minutes ago. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
Re: [AOLSERVER] Ns_PgExec looking in wrong place for plpgsql.so
On Thursday 27 March 2003 17:53, Tom Jackson wrote: I've compiled pgdriver version 2.0.1 with the Curious as to why the old version AOLserver complains: ns_PgExec: result status: 7 message: ERROR: Load of file /usr/local/pgsql/lib/plpgsql.so failed... That's the PostgreSQL backend issuing that message. Any ideas on what I am doing wrong? What is the SQL you are executing that produces this error? AOLserver itself (and the postgres driver) doesn't use, need, or try to load plpgsql.so, which is the handler library for PL/Pgsql and is loaded by the PostgreSQL backend. Also postgres was compiled on another machine. For some reason, 7.1.3 doesn't compile on RH8.0 No, 7.1.3 won't compile on RH8 due to 7.1.3 not being gcc3-compliant. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list: http://www.aolserver.com/listserv.html List information and options: http://listserv.aol.com/
Re: [AOLSERVER] Virtual Hosting by Name not IP.
On Friday 21 February 2003 11:59, Jeremy Cowgar wrote: I tried the 4.0 because I am just now setting up a site running AOL Server, but I could not get the nspostgresql to compile with the 4.0 codebase. Is their some trick? Get the 4.0beta1 nspostgres I released last week. You also have to make sure to load nsdb.so separately. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 I. To remove yourself from this list: Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the BODY of your message: signoff aolserver II. For a complete list of listserv options please visit: http://listserv.aol.com/ III. For more AOLserver information please visit: http://www.aolserver.com/
Re: [AOLSERVER] nspostgres
On Monday 10 February 2003 11:05, Scott Goodwin wrote: Pull the CVS copy of nspostgres -- I believe that one works with AOLserver 4.x, but hasn't been packaged for a release yet. That would be correct. I probably should package it up, though. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] Modules for AS4.0
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 18:31, Brett Schwarz wrote: Has the module interface changed in 4.0? I am trying to compile a C module I wrote for AS3.5. It compiles fine, but when I try to start AS, I get undefined symbol error: [14/Jan/2003:15:20:51][14736.1024][-main-] Warning: modload: could not load /usr/local/aolserver40/bin/nsresult.so: /usr/local/aolserver40/bin/nsresult.so: undefined symbol: Ns_DbGetRow [14/Jan/2003:15:20:51][14736.1024][-main-] Fatal: modload: failed to load module '/usr/local/aolserver40/bin/nsresult.so' #include nsdb.h -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] Modules for AS4.0
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 11:43, Brett Schwarz wrote: I have that already in my source code, otherwise, it wouldn't compile ;^) True enough. I suffered a massive server meltdown last night, and that was the first thing I thought of (in my apparently somewhat incoherent state). As the other poster has mentioned, you'll need to explicitly link with the nsdb library. Hmmm. I need to check nspostgres for that linkage, too. After I get more coherent. The short of it: during a load test, my Redhat 8.0 server scribbled tcl code from OpenACS all over my root filesystem. I don't think it was an nsd problem; I think the soundcard driver suffered buffer overruns (while encoding RealAudio with helix producer 9 for Internet streaming) to the extent that it corrupted enough kernel structures to cause filesystem problems. Fortunately I'm a believer in the minimal root filesystem, and all critical data (except /etc) was on other filesystems, which did not suffer corruption. A hexdump (with ascii output) of the raw partition shows random tcl procedure snippets all over the inode tables of the filesystem. I got everything restored about 1:30 this morning, and had to be back here early. Need more coffee. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] nspostgres 3.5 released.
On Monday 23 December 2002 23:51, Marc Spitzer wrote: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Having been no bug reports on 3.5beta1, 3.5 is now released. The only change from 3.5beta1 is to comments, the README, and the ChangeLog. No code has changed. will this work with the aolserver 4 also? Honestly I don't know. I do know that it will compile with the AOLserver 4 headers in the path; I'm not yet up to speed on getting AOLserver 4 running here. It will be tested. When I do test and verify correct operation under AOLserver4, I'll certainly let everyone know. If you were to test and verify before I did, that would be fine, too. :-) I guess my AOLserver HEAD CVS checkout needs to get some exercise after the holidays :-) -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
[AOLSERVER] nspostgres 3.5 released.
Having been no bug reports on 3.5beta1, 3.5 is now released. The only change from 3.5beta1 is to comments, the README, and the ChangeLog. No code has changed. TODO: Have the dropping out of postmaster not crash AOLserver (driver fault). -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
[AOLSERVER] nspostgres 3.5beta1 driver available for testing.
I am pleased to announce a beta testing release of the PostgreSQL driver for AOLserver. This driver is the most up-to-date PostgreSQL driver available, having been derived from the driver in the CURRENT OpenACS CVS. The driver is available from the files section of the AOLserver SourceForge site -- http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/aolserver/nspostgres-3.5beta1.tar.gz?download is a direct link. This driver is working well for me on an OpenACS CVS HEAD installation. If no major problems are found in two weeks, this beta will be promoted to full release 3.5. Many thanks to Scott Goodwin in this release. Enjoy! -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
[AOLSERVER] URL case insensitivity.
This may be an obvious one, but I'm trying to move a site over from an IIS host to an AOLserver one, and the web pages link to mixed-case filenames. However, the filenames are all actually lower case, meaning I get a lot of 404's. With IIS this works fine. Broken, perhaps -- but it works. There are several thousand pages involved, and we want to mirror the two sites. Changing all the links is not an option due to many factors. :-(. I looked through the configuration reference, and didn't see anything addressing this issue. Does anyone know of a solution better than storing the files on a FAT filesystem with Linux doing the case reversion in the filesystem layer? Maybe I'm just blind -- but in my five years of running AOLserver I've never run across having to do this. Something like 'urlcase tolower' (modeled after the existent 'headercase' setting) would be nice, but I didn't see it. If I've just missed it, I apologize for wasting bandwidth. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] URL case insensitivity.
On Friday 08 November 2002 13:05, Patrick Spence wrote: From: Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] This may be an obvious one, but I'm trying to move a site over from an IIS host to an AOLserver one, and the web pages link to mixed-case filenames. However, the filenames are all actually lower case, meaning I get a lot of 404's. There used to be a custom 404/notfound handler module for Aolserver that would give you the option of having it check for case mismatch as part of its operation...it worked great.. but I cannot seem to find it anymore.. Apache has mod_speling (sic) that can do this. I'm somewhat surprised this isn't a more common thing. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] How I'll vote for core team members (long)
On Friday 08 November 2002 13:25, Peter M. Jansson wrote: here. Every core team member does not have to have every criterion, but the three candidates need to be able to join together, Voltron-like, to I don't know which is scarier. The fact he used 'Voltron' in a sentence, or the fact that I grokked it. Lengthier reply to criteria later. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
[AOLSERVER] [OT] Re: [AOLSERVER] How I'll vote for core team members (long)
On Friday 08 November 2002 13:40, Patrick Spence wrote: Heheh, my first thought was but Voltron used 5 lions.. not 3 :) Which of the three Voltrons? :-) There was a Voltron with three parts. Way off-topic. Sorry. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] URL case insensitivity.
On Friday 08 November 2002 13:43, Jim Wilcoxson wrote: Here is a TCL hack to serve files w/o case sensitivity (not tested): I might give that a whirl later. The loopback-mount VFAT works, and works well, as long as you remember VFAT's root directory limits on number of files. Basically: nsadmin has uid=501, gid=501: dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.VFAT bs=1024k count=$number-of-megabytes mkfs.vfat fs.VFAT mount -o loop temp-mnt-point fs.VFAT cp -rv $AOLSERVERHOME/servers/servername/* temp-mnt-point umount temp-mnt-point Move the old servername tree out of the way, then edit /etc/fstab to add the line, assuming $AOLSERVERHOME = /home/nsadmin: /home/nsadmin/servers/servername/home/nsadmin/fs.VFAT vfat loop,uid=501,gid=501,auto 0 0 And mount -a. (or reboot). Performance is snappy. And the pageroot's quota is hard-coded in the size of the loopback mounted file. I didn't put /home/nsadmin/servers/servername/pages as the mount point due to too many files in the root directory on this particular site. I'll just have to watch the growth of the log files in modules. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] [OT] Re: [AOLSERVER] How I'll vote for core team members (long)
On Friday 08 November 2002 16:17, Gabriel Ricard wrote: Am I missing something? I only recall the one with the lions and the one with the cars. What was the other one? google for 'Albegas' -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver Project Update
On Thursday 07 November 2002 13:21, Jim Davidson wrote: As you may have noticed, we've been making some changes with our management of the AOLserver project here at AOL. Basically, we're applying some lessons learned from other successful OpenSource projects such as Apache to provide better support for you in the community. To help you understand these changes, I'd like to provide you some background on AOLserver including my role in the project. [snip] As an AOLserver/AOLpress (RIP) user since May 1997, I applaud the new direction this project is taking. The moves of the last few weeks are refreshing to me, and reinforce my decision to continue forward with AOLserver rather than an Apache/PHP cookie-cutter site for WGCR Radio. We are in the midst of a redesign/revamp using OpenACS 4, and the direction the base server takes or doesn't take is critical in my continued justification of using a fairly arcane and obscure webserver. My insistence on using this particular server has come under fire before because the server isn't as popular as some. While I don't feel like I should be on core, I do want to continue helping as I can with development in the future. As the shape of 4.0 develops, I can focus on how that will impact the PostgreSQL driver, to the point that I may be able to maintain that. Maybe I will have the time I would like to have to do this. In all honesty, I was beginning to wonder about the wisdom of continuing to use AOLserver in this application, but the renewed vigor in this area is nice. So, today will be the first chat I will attend, as ramifordistat, because of this rejuvenation. Jim, many thanks for the explanation, and I look forward to continuing using this fine server. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver and Red Hat 8
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 11:11 am, Simon Millward wrote: As Mandrake is also very fond of claiming they are 100% compatible with RedHat this would lead me to suspect that what applies for one also goes for the other This has tweaked my interest though, so if anyone can provide a definitive answer I'd also like to know The definitive answer will be found in the kernel source RPM (not the kernel-source RPM, but the kernel .src.rpm). Compare the patches for each distribution and see what the differences are. Install the .src.rpm, and check the spec file as well as the individual patchsets (found on Red Hat in /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES and /usr/src/redhat/SPECS). Being 100% compatible != having the same kernel patches. As I don't do Mandrake anymore (my having some bad compatibility problems a few cycles back, as well as having a close relationship with Red Hat, as well as maintaining the PostgreSQL RPMset), I can't check the differences myself. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver and Red Hat 8
On Tuesday 01 October 2002 03:20 pm, Steve Manning wrote: Do you (or anyone) know if these multithreaded benefits are spcific to Redhat or some aspect of the kernel they are using. I've just downloaded Mandrake 9.0 which is using the 2.4.19 kernel and wondered if these changes would be seen here (I'll have a dig around myself but thought I'd ask in case the answers already known). Red Hat's kernel patches may not be the same as Mandrake's. Red Hat's kernels have never been anywhere close to 'vanilla' Linus kernels. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver Postgres Driver (2.3.0)
On Saturday 28 September 2002 09:38 pm, Daniel P. Stasinski wrote: This should also go on the site (AOLserver Postgres Driver v2.3.0). Ours is still old and crashes the server. Scott has, I believe, refactored the AOLserver Postgres Driver somewhat. My recommendation is to sync the two, and fix the bug that had the patch issued earlier. Scott, if you would like I can take a look at that this week. AFAIK I still have commit privileges on AS CVS on SF. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] listserv.aol.com does not work with Netscape 4.77 ?
On Monday 01 July 2002 05:28 pm, Andrew Piskorski wrote: http://listserv.aol.com/archives/aolserver.html The list archives don't seem to be working at all with Netscape 4.77 (on Linux). The login page is returned ok, but Netscape renders it as a completely blank page. Neither IE nor lynx have this problem, but, it sure is annoying. Anybody know what's wrong? And is there a more usefull archive of the list anywhere else? Thanks! In IE view the page source and see if there is a missing /TABLE tag. Or for that matter ANY unclosed tag -- TABLE is the biggest offender with Netscape. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] Problems with nsd 2.3.3 on RH 7.2
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 12:38 pm, Janine Sisk wrote: This is on 7.2, btw, not 6.2 - on 6.2 it works ok. On 7.2 it most definitely does not. This site ran ok on Solaris, too - it had some problems there but this was not one of them. 7.2's glibc is so much newer than 6.2's that the linkage may be broken. Binaries linked/compiled under 6.2 usually do _not_ work properly on 7.2. Even with the compat libraries installed. The reason seems to be kernel 2.4. My recommendation would be to downgrade to 6.2 (making sure to install all the RedHat errata, as a out-of-the-box 6.2 will be rooted within minutes of coming online) on this server. I'm working on getting postgresql-7.2.1 RPM's that will install properly on 6.2. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] linux 2.4 and threading causes panic?
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 02:20 pm, Dossy wrote: That should segfault, but if it's inside a thread, memory protection in the Linux kernel doesn't seem to stop the thread from hosing memory it's not allowed to touch. That's my guess as to why my box keeps panicking, at least. Trying to stave off the obvious here: you have at least twice as much swap as physical RAM, right? The 2.4.x kernel can die a horrible screaming death if swap isn't larger than twice RAM -- under many conditions, segfaulting being one of them. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] Again, Segfault with Aolserver, PHP, SquirrelMail
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 12:22 pm, Dossy wrote: On 2001.11.27, Scott Goodwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frankly, I'm surprised that a bad path would cause a segfault, which leads me to believe that some var or pointer isn't being initialized before use. My WAG would be that this is some keep people from busting out of a chroot jail code that's busted. The path that PHP is trying to canonicalize is of the form ../ and a segfault on that smells fishy of things like this. RH6 to RH7 made the jump from libc5 to glibc2, right? Hmm... No. RH6 = glibc 2.1 RH7= glibc 2.2 -- 7.1 and 7.2 are kernel 2.4. The last Red Hat with libc5 was 4.2. Red Hat 5.0 did the libc5-glibc 2.0 upgrade. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver operational issues
On Thursday 20 September 2001 10:39 am, Jim Wilcoxson wrote: was happening. I seem to recall thread startup being 2-3 seconds, which is an eternity compared to 2.3.3. With 2.3.3, we just bumped maxthreads whenever we were hitting that limit a few times a day. With 3.X, we will have to keep in mind the long thread startup time and realize that most of the time it will be better for a new request to wait until another thread is finished rather than starting a new thread. My question is: how is AOLserver4 going to handle this? Is AS4 going to throwback to 2.3.3's design in this for performance? This makes our decision to stick with 2.3.3 here look more attractive Of course, 2.3.3 had/has its own problems, but this one is not one of them. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver operational issues
On Thursday 20 September 2001 11:01 am, Peter M. Jansson wrote: On Thursday, September 20, 2001, at 10:53 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: to stick with 2.3.3 here look more attractive Of course, 2.3.3 had/has its own problems, but this one is not one of them. If you run one or two web nsds per machine, you'll definitely win with AOLserver 3 or 4 -- it just works better, has fewer bugs, and Kriston won' t yell at you for using obsolete software. In my current circumstance, I'd be running multiple nsd's under 3.x. A single 2.3.3 nsd handles, oh, about 15 IP addresses here, for our hosted sites as well as our internal sites. We're not large enough to dedicate Due to the many changes from 2.3.3-3.0, 2.3.3 cannot fairly be called obsolete, as it is still useful for many. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver operational issues
On Thursday 20 September 2001 12:07 pm, Lamar Owen wrote: In my current circumstance, I'd be running multiple nsd's under 3.x. A single 2.3.3 nsd handles, oh, about 15 IP addresses here, for our hosted sites as well as our internal sites. We're not large enough to dedicate Incomplete thought, there. The thought should have been: We're not large enough to dedicate a whole server machine to each hosted site or pairs/quads of sites. And AS 2.3.3 on a PPro 200 with 64MB can handle 15-20 virtual servers on a T1 with aplomb. We did upgrade the hardware to an AMD K6-2/500 w/ 256MB earlier this year -- and it just sits and runs happily. And the Nimda menace didn't cause any problems -- even though we got hit 800,000 times thus far across our hosts. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] Which postgres driver should I use?
On Tuesday 21 August 2001 09:33, you wrote: But there may be reasons why it's not being hosted there that someone can shed light on. It was mentioned long ago about moving the source over but it is probably that nobody ever got around to actually doing it. When I had CVS access (which, unless Kris dropped me from the list, I still have) I went to make an attempt at doing just this. I quickly realized that it was best to have the driver in one canonical place. In fact, I believe this was discussed at length on this list -- although I may be barking up the wrong tree. Keeping two separate repositories synced isn't really a wise move, IMHO. IIRC I am the one who suggested it be dropped from the AOLserver CVS. The reason was that the OpenACS version was under more active development, and should be considered canonical. The version available for download from aolserver.com should not be. (Yes, that's the end of the thought -- that version should not exist, should not be used, etc. The OpenACS version is The One.) But, if someone else wants to try to do this, be my guest. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] .ida code red worm crashes AOLserver 2.1 on Win 2k
On Friday 20 July 2001 09:41, you wrote: Well, how about that -- 21 failures in my log since Monday morn, all with the following query: /default.ida?NN I got 78. No crashes yet. AS 2.3.3/Linux. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
Re: [AOLSERVER] Netcraft numbers out.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 02 June 2001 00:16, you wrote: On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:45:03PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote: It's still mostly like that, with the difference from 4K to 377K being domains hosted by mydomain.com, which all point to 1 AOLserver. Look at http://www.my-example.com for one example. And I wonder how many Apache or IIS sites are in the same category? I think that the fact that mydomain.com is using AOLserver to serve 100K domains is _significant_ testimony to AOLserver's capability in this area. - -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7GUEF5kGGI8vV9eERAlAbAKDKfEBW4gSHPFyG+5kcneEhBte1MQCeO1Lo ab8kSJRfm5DC/2b4o2dgDmM= =BPIw -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [AOLSERVER] Netcraft numbers out.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 01 June 2001 17:11, you wrote: On 2001.06.01, Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is great news. What I'm curious about are what ARE all these sites that are running AOLserver? Netcraft gives some numbers, but they're very generic. The raw data would be nice. 337K was .com, though. There was a good .uk showing, and a handful of .am and .ru sites. To see where AOLserver _was_, all one must do is look down the list to the NaviServer entry.at a super 3.5K. - -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7GBe95kGGI8vV9eERApbtAJ9LkcA0o1IJOFdTeOf4HHa0jk39tQCfdEUC TqsI3IcTsTM3byVpLe3noXg= =sVZR -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [AOLSERVER] aolserver documentation
Kris Rehberg wrote: Rather than having the entire list membership share their opinion over and over that the documentation sucks, please join us and submit corrections to the Bug Tracker, Category: Other:Documentation, Group: documentation: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=103152group_id=3152func=browse Let me go on the record as saying the AOLserver documentation does not 'suck.' I have seen documentation that sucked -- and I have used AOLserver for some time, and the documentation has never sucked. It may not be in the same tight shape now as it was in 2.1/2.2/2.3 days, but, then again, there's not the same full-time doc person on the payroll either. I have seen much worse documentation than the current 3.x set, believe you me. So, Kris, the 'entire list membership' doesn't feel that way. While everything can stand improvement (and I have seen some improvement in various areas in the last little while), the documentation could be much worse. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
