Re: ITSM logging = timeout problem

2008-12-09 Thread Wheeler, Dylan

Thanks Phil,
I've got a ticket open with our support (3rd party, not BMC) and  
they've never heard of the error either. I have the latest user tool  
patch, least it was the latest last week when I upgraded it :)

I'll ask our support if they know of any hotfixes that might help.

Quoting Phil Murnane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Dylan:

Maybe FD stands for File Descriptor?  Don't know if that's helpful, but ...

Anyway, the last time I worked with SLM, around July of this year,   
there were some hotfixes you had to request directly from BMC   
support.  They might be available as patches now, but it might not   
hurt to open a ticket and see if there are any fixes for known   
problems.


Come to think of it, you might be seeing a User Tool bug, so you may  
 want to see if there's a newer patch available.


HTH,
--Phil



- Original Message 
From: Wheeler, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2008 6:14:47 PM
Subject: Re: ITSM logging = timeout problem

Thanks Rosemary, I'll give it a shot.

Our Data Sources had a different field set then the Submit Date so I
set it to that to try out.

Our Business Entity was already set correctly. We're available 6am-6pm
M-F so they had it setup weekly with those times to start. We'll see
if it helps at all :)

Still worried about the 2.5M errors in 10 minutes though heh

Dylan

Quoting Rosemary [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Hi Dylan,

I had a similar issue where the problem ended up being caused by dodgy SLM
configuration:

A combination of two things - one was I had specified the wrong type of
field in the Start Time for Request-Based SVTs in HPD:Help Desk SLM Data
Sources. I cleared the value and let it choose the default Start Time
(submit date).

The second part of the issue was that I had a dodgy Business Entity
configured for 24x7 support. I had to change it from a Daily recurrence type
to a Weekly recurrence type and select all the days of the week.

Hope this helps,
Rosemary

On 12/9/08, Wheeler, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Rosemary,
Yes we have 5 Service Targets attaching to a new incident.

Quoting Rosemary [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Not sure about the error log, but do you have any Service Targets attaching

to these Incidents?


On 12/9/08, Wheeler, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I'm having a problem with ITSM 7 and submitting incidents while I try and
log.
I submit an incident in the WUT and it goes through fine, bit slow but
it's
my dev system and it's not the best of boxes.
I turn on AL and filter logs in the WUT and try to submit another ticket
and it times out.
I have checked the server after and notice that my plugin and arserver
process are running at about 50% each, taking up 90-100% of the processor
time for a long time after the submission. So I did some logging and in
10
minutes I got about 2.5 million of the following error in the log.

PLGN TID: 000412 RPC ID: 00 Queue: Dispatcher
Client-RPC:
00 BMC.ARDBC.NOTIFY FINE DEBUG TCPSV Got a Bad FD !! 3084

I'm not sure what's causing the error. Anyone run into this before or
have
a clue where to start looking?

Dylan
Pacific Life



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are




___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are




___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are





___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


ITSM logging = timeout problem

2008-12-08 Thread Wheeler, Dylan

I'm having a problem with ITSM 7 and submitting incidents while I try and log.
I submit an incident in the WUT and it goes through fine, bit slow but  
it's my dev system and it's not the best of boxes.
I turn on AL and filter logs in the WUT and try to submit another  
ticket and it times out.
I have checked the server after and notice that my plugin and arserver  
process are running at about 50% each, taking up 90-100% of the  
processor time for a long time after the submission. So I did some  
logging and in 10 minutes I got about 2.5 million of the following  
error in the log.


PLGN TID: 000412 RPC ID: 00 Queue: Dispatcher  
Client-RPC: 00 BMC.ARDBC.NOTIFY FINE DEBUG TCPSV Got a Bad  
FD !! 3084


I'm not sure what's causing the error. Anyone run into this before or  
have a clue where to start looking?


Dylan
Pacific Life

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: ITSM logging = timeout problem

2008-12-08 Thread Rosemary
Not sure about the error log, but do you have any Service Targets attaching
to these Incidents?


On 12/9/08, Wheeler, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm having a problem with ITSM 7 and submitting incidents while I try and
 log.
 I submit an incident in the WUT and it goes through fine, bit slow but it's
 my dev system and it's not the best of boxes.
 I turn on AL and filter logs in the WUT and try to submit another ticket
 and it times out.
 I have checked the server after and notice that my plugin and arserver
 process are running at about 50% each, taking up 90-100% of the processor
 time for a long time after the submission. So I did some logging and in 10
 minutes I got about 2.5 million of the following error in the log.

 PLGN TID: 000412 RPC ID: 00 Queue: Dispatcher Client-RPC:
 00 BMC.ARDBC.NOTIFY FINE DEBUG TCPSV Got a Bad FD !! 3084

 I'm not sure what's causing the error. Anyone run into this before or have
 a clue where to start looking?

 Dylan
 Pacific Life


 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: ITSM logging = timeout problem

2008-12-08 Thread Wheeler, Dylan

Hi Rosemary,
Yes we have 5 Service Targets attaching to a new incident.

Quoting Rosemary [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Not sure about the error log, but do you have any Service Targets attaching
to these Incidents?


On 12/9/08, Wheeler, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I'm having a problem with ITSM 7 and submitting incidents while I try and
log.
I submit an incident in the WUT and it goes through fine, bit slow but it's
my dev system and it's not the best of boxes.
I turn on AL and filter logs in the WUT and try to submit another ticket
and it times out.
I have checked the server after and notice that my plugin and arserver
process are running at about 50% each, taking up 90-100% of the processor
time for a long time after the submission. So I did some logging and in 10
minutes I got about 2.5 million of the following error in the log.

PLGN TID: 000412 RPC ID: 00 Queue: Dispatcher Client-RPC:
00 BMC.ARDBC.NOTIFY FINE DEBUG TCPSV Got a Bad FD !! 3084

I'm not sure what's causing the error. Anyone run into this before or have
a clue where to start looking?

Dylan
Pacific Life


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: ITSM logging = timeout problem

2008-12-08 Thread Rosemary
Hi Dylan,

I had a similar issue where the problem ended up being caused by dodgy SLM
configuration:

A combination of two things - one was I had specified the wrong type of
field in the Start Time for Request-Based SVTs in HPD:Help Desk SLM Data
Sources. I cleared the value and let it choose the default Start Time
(submit date).

The second part of the issue was that I had a dodgy Business Entity
configured for 24x7 support. I had to change it from a Daily recurrence type
to a Weekly recurrence type and select all the days of the week.

Hope this helps,
Rosemary

On 12/9/08, Wheeler, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Rosemary,
 Yes we have 5 Service Targets attaching to a new incident.

 Quoting Rosemary [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Not sure about the error log, but do you have any Service Targets attaching
 to these Incidents?


 On 12/9/08, Wheeler, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I'm having a problem with ITSM 7 and submitting incidents while I try and
 log.
 I submit an incident in the WUT and it goes through fine, bit slow but
 it's
 my dev system and it's not the best of boxes.
 I turn on AL and filter logs in the WUT and try to submit another ticket
 and it times out.
 I have checked the server after and notice that my plugin and arserver
 process are running at about 50% each, taking up 90-100% of the processor
 time for a long time after the submission. So I did some logging and in
 10
 minutes I got about 2.5 million of the following error in the log.

 PLGN TID: 000412 RPC ID: 00 Queue: Dispatcher
 Client-RPC:
 00 BMC.ARDBC.NOTIFY FINE DEBUG TCPSV Got a Bad FD !! 3084

 I'm not sure what's causing the error. Anyone run into this before or
 have
 a clue where to start looking?

 Dylan
 Pacific Life



 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: ITSM logging = timeout problem

2008-12-08 Thread Wheeler, Dylan

Thanks Rosemary, I'll give it a shot.

Our Data Sources had a different field set then the Submit Date so I  
set it to that to try out.


Our Business Entity was already set correctly. We're available 6am-6pm  
M-F so they had it setup weekly with those times to start. We'll see  
if it helps at all :)


Still worried about the 2.5M errors in 10 minutes though heh

Dylan

Quoting Rosemary [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Hi Dylan,

I had a similar issue where the problem ended up being caused by dodgy SLM
configuration:

A combination of two things - one was I had specified the wrong type of
field in the Start Time for Request-Based SVTs in HPD:Help Desk SLM Data
Sources. I cleared the value and let it choose the default Start Time
(submit date).

The second part of the issue was that I had a dodgy Business Entity
configured for 24x7 support. I had to change it from a Daily recurrence type
to a Weekly recurrence type and select all the days of the week.

Hope this helps,
Rosemary

On 12/9/08, Wheeler, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi Rosemary,
Yes we have 5 Service Targets attaching to a new incident.

Quoting Rosemary [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Not sure about the error log, but do you have any Service Targets attaching

to these Incidents?


On 12/9/08, Wheeler, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I'm having a problem with ITSM 7 and submitting incidents while I try and
log.
I submit an incident in the WUT and it goes through fine, bit slow but
it's
my dev system and it's not the best of boxes.
I turn on AL and filter logs in the WUT and try to submit another ticket
and it times out.
I have checked the server after and notice that my plugin and arserver
process are running at about 50% each, taking up 90-100% of the processor
time for a long time after the submission. So I did some logging and in
10
minutes I got about 2.5 million of the following error in the log.

PLGN TID: 000412 RPC ID: 00 Queue: Dispatcher
Client-RPC:
00 BMC.ARDBC.NOTIFY FINE DEBUG TCPSV Got a Bad FD !! 3084

I'm not sure what's causing the error. Anyone run into this before or
have
a clue where to start looking?

Dylan
Pacific Life



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are




___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are




___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


Re: ITSM logging = timeout problem

2008-12-08 Thread Phil Murnane
Dylan:

Maybe FD stands for File Descriptor?  Don't know if that's helpful, but ...

Anyway, the last time I worked with SLM, around July of this year, there were 
some hotfixes you had to request directly from BMC support.  They might be 
available as patches now, but it might not hurt to open a ticket and see if 
there are any fixes for known problems.

Come to think of it, you might be seeing a User Tool bug, so you may want to 
see if there's a newer patch available.

HTH,
--Phil



- Original Message 
From: Wheeler, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2008 6:14:47 PM
Subject: Re: ITSM logging = timeout problem

Thanks Rosemary, I'll give it a shot.

Our Data Sources had a different field set then the Submit Date so I  
set it to that to try out.

Our Business Entity was already set correctly. We're available 6am-6pm  
M-F so they had it setup weekly with those times to start. We'll see  
if it helps at all :)

Still worried about the 2.5M errors in 10 minutes though heh

Dylan

Quoting Rosemary [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi Dylan,

 I had a similar issue where the problem ended up being caused by dodgy SLM
 configuration:

 A combination of two things - one was I had specified the wrong type of
 field in the Start Time for Request-Based SVTs in HPD:Help Desk SLM Data
 Sources. I cleared the value and let it choose the default Start Time
 (submit date).

 The second part of the issue was that I had a dodgy Business Entity
 configured for 24x7 support. I had to change it from a Daily recurrence type
 to a Weekly recurrence type and select all the days of the week.

 Hope this helps,
 Rosemary

 On 12/9/08, Wheeler, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Rosemary,
 Yes we have 5 Service Targets attaching to a new incident.

 Quoting Rosemary [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Not sure about the error log, but do you have any Service Targets attaching
 to these Incidents?


 On 12/9/08, Wheeler, Dylan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I'm having a problem with ITSM 7 and submitting incidents while I try and
 log.
 I submit an incident in the WUT and it goes through fine, bit slow but
 it's
 my dev system and it's not the best of boxes.
 I turn on AL and filter logs in the WUT and try to submit another ticket
 and it times out.
 I have checked the server after and notice that my plugin and arserver
 process are running at about 50% each, taking up 90-100% of the processor
 time for a long time after the submission. So I did some logging and in
 10
 minutes I got about 2.5 million of the following error in the log.

 PLGN TID: 000412 RPC ID: 00 Queue: Dispatcher
 Client-RPC:
 00 BMC.ARDBC.NOTIFY FINE DEBUG TCPSV Got a Bad FD !! 3084

 I'm not sure what's causing the error. Anyone run into this before or
 have
 a clue where to start looking?

 Dylan
 Pacific Life



 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


 ___
 UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
 Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are



  

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are