Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP vs SCCP vs XML

2003-08-26 Thread Jamie Carl
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:45:22 -0400
 Ray Burkholder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of 
CommuniGate(tm) Pro*

No, this is not the case currently with any of the Cisco 
SIP software 
loads that I am aware of.  If you find this to be 
incorrect, please 
let the list know.  Cisco has not deployed much of the 
featureset in 
their SCCP phones (such as paging/intercom) into the SIP 
phones due 
to lack of standards/interest/political capital.

JT


Ok, after further research in the 7960 administrators 
guide for SIP 5.1
(current is 5.3 and probably not changed much), they do 
state that
support is not provided for CiscoIPPhoneExecute in the 
current SIP load,
which is needed to make streaming channel 1 work. 
Bummer.

So, in looking around at HotDispatch.com, I see a number 
of companies
charging outrageous dollars for their own SCCP versions 
of a softphone.

Also, a while back, for $1000, a person could join 
Cisco's developer
program and gain access to SCCP docs.  Perhaps an 
Asterisk group member
has the funds available to attempt joining?  Then we 
could finish up on
some of the aborted attempts at SCCP integration, if the 
license
agreement allows this sort of development.

Perhaps, through a little creativity, it might be 
possible to use a SCCP
796x phone and not worry about SCCP.  With XML, screens 
could be
programmed to send responses back to *.  Then * could 
drive streaming
channel 1 directly and simulate the phone call.  So, on a 
SCCP phone,
you don't use SCCP, nor SIP.  You use XML.  Would that 
work?  Hopefully
soft button presses don't interfere with the streaming 
media.

Oh, and if it does work, then you can use multicasting to 
intercom a
number of phones simultaneously.

The thing I miss on SIP phones that was available on the 
Callmanager
version of 796x, is the ability to go off hook, dial some 
numbers, and
callmanager automatically dials the call.  The SIP 
version requires you
to go off hook, dial the digits, then press dial.  Any 
way around this
for 4, 7, 10 or 11 digit dialling?



Good question..   Does * support overlap dialing with SIP?

I have a feeling it does, I do vaguely remember getting an 
Address Incomplete response when not dialing enough 
digits.  I guess all you have to do is set your cisco 
phone for overlap dialing.  Hopefully there is an option 
for it in is config. 

Regards,

Jamie Carl
Jazz Inc.
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:www.jazz-inc.net
Phone:  +61-414-365-466
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP vs SCCP vs XML

2003-08-26 Thread Eric Wieling
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 18:40, Adam Roach wrote:
 As a side note, I'll point out that the Pingtel phones let
 you provision client-side digitmaps. Based on asterisk-like
 pattern matching, you get to say how long a digit string
 should be matched, and the phone will automatically dial
 when it matches (no need to hit send!). You can even make
 different patterns go different places, like:
 
 972xxx : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 214xxx : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 489xxx : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 1xx : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 (To clarify: Dallas has three local area codes and 10 digit
 local dialing)

The Cisco ATA-186 also has a Dial Plan config option. 
http://1.2.3.4/dev/ to access the ATA's config screen.  HOWEVER, I've
never been able to figure out the damn thing.  Even with reading the
docs.

-- 
BTEL Consulting
850-484-4535 x2111 (Office)
504-595-3916 x2111 (Experimental)
877-552-0838 (Backup Phone)

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP vs SCCP vs XML

2003-08-26 Thread Ray Burkholder

 As to prior comments about SCCP documentation: if you'd like to help 
 contribute to the SCCP channel project, it seems far from 'aborted' 
 at the moment.  Check out http://sourceforge.net/projects/sccp/  and 
 download the channel.  Compile, test, send bugs, submit code.
 

The web site indicates that This Project Has Not Released Any Files.
Am I not seeing something?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP vs SCCP vs XML

2003-08-26 Thread Lee Goodman
Use the dialplan.xml file on the SIP phone. It will let you set how many
digits to accept before beginning the dialing process, (you don't need
to hit the DIAL button)

Lee Goodman

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Roach
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 7:41 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP vs SCCP vs XML


I'll start by mentioning that the newer Cisco SIP dumps
let you hit # instead of Dial when you're done dialing, which I find
to be much more intuitive than the Dial softbutton.

 Good question..   Does * support overlap dialing with SIP?
 
 I have a feeling it does, I do vaguely remember getting an
 Address Incomplete response when not dialing enough 
 digits.  I guess all you have to do is set your Cisco 
 phone for overlap dialing.  Hopefully there is an option 
 for it in is config. 

Even if Asterisk does the overlap stuff defined in RFC 3578,
I seriously doubt you'll see the Cisco phones (or any hardware phones,
for that matter) doing it. The overlap stuff is really designed for
gateways from the PSTN, not end terminals.

That said, there's nothing that would *prevent* implementing
it in end devices. I note that it would cause an awful lot
of signaling traffic if you did so, though.

As a side note, I'll point out that the Pingtel phones let
you provision client-side digitmaps. Based on asterisk-like pattern
matching, you get to say how long a digit string should be matched, and
the phone will automatically dial when it matches (no need to hit
send!). You can even make different patterns go different places, like:

972xxx : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
214xxx : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
489xxx : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1xx : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(To clarify: Dallas has three local area codes and 10 digit local
dialing)

/a
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intercom with Cisco SIP 796x phones?

2003-08-26 Thread Lee Goodman
What about the option of auto-answer that is available on Cisco 7960
version 5.x? Could you not setup a second line instance on the phone and
set that line instance to auto answer?

Lee Goodman

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Laur
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intercom with Cisco SIP 796x phones?


BTXML support for client applications is necessary to achieve this. The
SIP images state that they support BTXML; however, they only use it for
their internal screens and internal navigation. CMXML is the only
language supported for client applications with the SIP loads currently.
A little bird at Cisco told me that a future version of the SIP loads
will support BTXML client applications. (and a less reliable bird told
me that the next version of call mangler will be SIP-based)

This will support all of the good stuff I really want to be able to do
with this phone. For instance, we could forward a URL with the call to a
BTXML app that causes the phone to display extended information about
the caller, or the voicemail Services button could show the users a menu
of their voicemails and choosing one would play the message directly
over the speaker. Also, intercom would be supported. All this is
documented in the BTXML guide and ready to go whenever they open it
up..

I suppose it might also be possible to find an exploit in the current
firmware that causes the phone to execute some BTXML from a remote
location.. we might be able to get in that way, too :)

John

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Todd
 Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 7:38 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Intercom with Cisco SIP 796x phones?
 
 If you find a way to make the phone request that second audio stream 
 without user intervention, I'm all ears.  :-)
 
 JT
 
 
 At 5:15 PM -0400 8/25/03, Ray Burkholder wrote:
 From: Ray Burkholder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Intercom with Cisco SIP 796x phones?
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:15:01 -0400
 
 I read about this intercom stuff on page 62  63 of the book
Developing
 Cisco IP Phone Services isbn 1-58705-060-9.  Primary calls take
place
 on streaming channel 0.  When streaming channel 0 is not in use, 
 streaming channel 1 can be used for asynchronously streaming (in and
 out) stuff like voicemail, email, and, yep the one we want, intercom.

 Page 87-88 of the book talks about CiscoIPPhoneExecute to push the 
 commands to the phone.
 
 On the last two pages of an addendum found at 
 http://services.dogma.net/errata.doc, more details are provided for 
 connecting to streaming port 1.
 
 http://cisco.evolvis.net/ivision/pdfs/Jukka_Nurmi_iVision2003.pdf
 provide some background on Cisco's IP Phone Services.  Title is
foreign
 language, but text is English.
 

http://www.loligo.com/asterisk/Cisco/79xx/2003-06-20.from-ftpeng.cisco.
c
 om/CMXML_App_Guide.pdf provides additional program details.
 
 From what I see, basic functionality should be a piece of cake.  The
fun
 will be in the Asterisk call control integration.
 
 All this hinges on the fact that all the XML functionality built into

 the CallManager phone load is also built into the recent SIP phone 
 loads.  I guess trial and error is the best way to find this out.
 
 Good Luck!
 
 Ray Burkholder
 One Unified
 519 570 0689 x2002
 
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of  Jared

  Smith
   Sent: August 25, 2003 15:11
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Is Asterisk ready for real use?
 
 
   Oh really?!?  Can you give us more information...
 
   On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 12:30, Ray Burkholder wrote:
The Cisco SIP phones have a second voice channel available  for 
  a paging   type of implementation.  Now the problem is simply of
   finding someone
and some time to see if it can be made to work with Asterisk.
   
Ray Burkholder
 
 
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
   --
   Scanned for viruses and dangerous content at  
  http://www.oneunified.net and is believed to be clean.
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intercom with Cisco SIP 796x phones?

2003-08-26 Thread John Todd
At 9:59 PM -0500 8/25/03, John Laur wrote:
BTXML support for client applications is necessary to achieve this. The
SIP images state that they support BTXML; however, they only use it for
their internal screens and internal navigation. CMXML is the only
language supported for client applications with the SIP loads currently.
A little bird at Cisco told me that a future version of the SIP loads
will support BTXML client applications. (and a less reliable bird told
me that the next version of call mangler will be SIP-based)
Yes, the same bird has told me similar stories.  However, Cisco is a 
large organization, and there are lots of birds there, some of them 
singing songs that will never be heard by the rest of the world.

Cisco's phones are great (IMHO) and are already full of nice 
features.  However, a few more features in the SIP load would make 
them much more market-able.  Much of this delay has to do with 
internal Cisco politics (despite what they might admit or realize) 
which is somewhat disheartening.

This will support all of the good stuff I really want to be able to do
with this phone. For instance, we could forward a URL with the call to a
BTXML app that causes the phone to display extended information about
the caller, or the voicemail Services button could show the users a menu
of their voicemails and choosing one would play the message directly
over the speaker. Also, intercom would be supported. All this is
documented in the BTXML guide and ready to go whenever they open it
up..
That would be really useful.

I suppose it might also be possible to find an exploit in the current
firmware that causes the phone to execute some BTXML from a remote
location.. we might be able to get in that way, too :)
My idea is to accept SIP NOTIFY messages, password-protected, that do 
certain things.  It's already part of the SIP spec.  An XML URL, as 
an example, would be perfect payload.  As would an INVITE to an 
auto-answer meta-extension (configurable from the phone) for intercom 
or paging.   I've made these suggestions through a feature request 
system within Cisco, and through what hopefully will be a clueful 
channel.  We'll see.

JT
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] gnophone connection

2003-08-26 Thread ashish
Title: Message



hello everybody

well...while 
trying to make gnophone to gnophone call using IAXtel's PBX server..i am not 
being able to establish a connetion
possibly whats 
happening is, we are not being able to transmit our message packets properly and 
result is its not being able to establish connection n is resending frmaes again 
and gain

here is message we 
are getting 


Tx-Frame 
Retry[000] Type IAX Subclass LAGRQ repeatedly


pls see to it if 
somebody can help me out

also interested in 
knowing something about configuring these GNOPHONE with 
our own ASTERISK 
server..which we have already downloaded and installed...we are still clueless 
about what all configuration files need to be modified and what else...pls help 
us if some body can

thanks

regards


Ashish 
AGrawal

Engineer
HFCL(RD)
Gurgaon 
,India


 


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Chan_h323 and a Cisco Gateway

2003-08-26 Thread Brian West
Well depends.. what kind of problem are you having?

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk701/technologies_tech_note09186a0080093f62.shtml

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk701/technologies_problem_troubleshooting09186a00800c5e33.shtml

Check those... I suspect one of those has nailed ya.

If you have PRI and you try to terminate outbound via chan_h323 you must
have bearer-cap speech on your voice-ports.  Because chan_h323 isn't
sending the appropriate bearer cap in the H.225 SETUP message.

Hours of beating head on desk and searching... Hope this helps.

Thanks,
Brian


On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Steven Thomas wrote:





 Hi,

 Can anyone tell me what should be included in h323.conf to get asterisk to
 talk to a Cisco 2600 gateway?  Any statement examples for extensions.conf
 would also be appreciated.  Thanks.

 Will chan_h323 use the Cisco as a gateway anyway?


 Regards,

 Steven Thomas

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Alias limitation in asterisk-oh323.0.5.5

2003-08-26 Thread Rattana BIV



Hi,

Is there limitation of alias creation in the file 
oh323.conf with asterisk-oh323.0.5.5 ?

In my config file I have 32 alias and when i call 
someone in h323 Asterisk do a segmentation fault.
I try to delete alias and have 9, everything is 
OK.

It is normal ?



Regards
Rattana


[Asterisk-Users] TDM10M Siemens Euroset 2015

2003-08-26 Thread Olaf Menzel
Hi all,

I have installed a TDM400 with one active FXS port (TDM10B) an connected
it to a Siemens Euroset 2015 analogue phone.
I have installed some smom IP phones to the network as well and
configured them as usual (sip.conf). For configuring the TDM10B I have
used FXO signalling in /etc/zaptel.conf and in
/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf. I definded the TDM channel and the Snom
phones to the same context (local) and created a dialplan for the local
dialing in extensions.conf.
 
I can dial from every Snom IP phone the any other Snom IP Phone. I can
dial from any Snom IP phone to the Siemens Euroset but I cannot dial
from the Siemens Euroset to any IP phone. While pressing the first
button of the Euroset's keyboard a busy tone is heared and Asterisk
console shows a hangup signal. Do you have any idea to solve this
problem ?
 
here are my configuration files:

/etc/zaptel.conf
---
#
# Zaptel Configuration File
#
# This file is parsed by the Zaptel Configurator, ztcfg
#
#
#
fxoks=1
loadzone = us
#loadzone=fr
#loadzone=fr
#loadzone=de
#loadzone=uk
defaultzone=us
-


/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf
-
;
; Zapata telephony interface
;
; Configuration file

[channels]
;
; Default language
;
language=en
;
; Default context
;

callerid=PBX Operator 2000
signalling=fxo_ks
relaxdtmf=yes
channel=1
context=local
-


/etc/asterisk/sip.conf
---
;
; SIP Configuration for Asterisk
;
[general]
port = 5060 ; Port to bind to
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0  ; Address to bind to
context =  default  ; Default for incoming calls
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
;tos=lowdelay
;tos=184
;maxexpirey=3600; Max length of incoming registration we
allow
;defaultexpirey=120 ; Default length of incoming/outoing
registration
;notifymimetype=text/plain  ; Allow overriding of mime type in
NOTIFY
;
;register = [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ; Register with a SIP provider
;register = [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1234 ; Register 2345 at sip provider
as 1234 here.
;

[snom1]
type=friend
host=129.26.10.121
dtmfmode=rfc2833
mailbox=2101
reinvite=no
context=local
callerid=Studenten 1 2101

[snom2]
type=friend
host=129.26.10.122
dtmfmode=rfc2833
mailbox=2102
reinvite=no
context=local
callerid=Studenten 2 2102

[snom3]
type=friend
host=129.26.10.108
dtmfmode=rfc2833
mailbox=2103
reinvite=no
context=local
callerid=Olaf 2103

[snom4]
type=friend
host=129.26.10.109
dtmfmode=rfc2833
mailbox=2104
reinvite=no
context=local
callerid=Samba 2104

[zaurus1]
type=friend
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=rfc2833
mailbox=2105
context=local
callerid=Zaurus1 2105
---

/etc/asterisk/extensions.conf
-
;
; Static extension configuration files, used by
; the pbx_config module.
;
; The General category is for certain variables.  
;
[general]
;
; If static is set to no, or omitted, then the pbx_config will rewrite
; this file when extensions are modified.  Remember that all comments
; made in the file will be lost when that happens. 
;
; XXX Not yet implemented XXX
;
static=yes
;
; if static=yes and writeprotect=no, you can save dialplan by
; CLI command 'save dialplan' too
;
writeprotect=no

;
; The Globals category contains global variables that can be
referenced
; in the dialplan with ${VARIABLE} or ${ENV(VARIABLE)} for Environmental
variable
; ${${VARIABLE}} or ${text${VARIABLE}} or any hybrid
;
[globals]
CONSOLE=/dev/dsp

[local]
; Operator/ Console
exten = 2000,1,Dial,Zap/1|30
exten = 2000,2,Voicemail,u2000
exten = 2000,102,Voicemail,b2000

; SIP Phones
exten = 2101,1,Dial,SIP/snom1|30
exten = 2001,2,Voicemail,u2001
exten = 2001,102,Voicemail,b2001

exten = 2102,1,Dial,SIP/snom2|30
exten = 2002,2,Voicemail,u2002
exten = 2002,102,Voicemail,b2002

exten = 2103,1,Dial,SIP/snom3|30
exten = 2003,2,Voicemail,u2003
exten = 2003,102,Voicemail,b2003

exten = 2104,1,Dial,SIP/snom4|30
exten = 2004,2,Voicemail,u2004
exten = 2004,102,Voicemail,b2004
-

Thank you for your help

Olaf
-- 
Dipl. Ing. Olaf Menzel - System Engineer
FOKUS - Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems:
- Competence Center for Advanced Satellite Communication
Schloss Birlinghoven, 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-14-3494  Mobile: +49-175-2616161 Fax: +49-2241-14-43494
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Internet:http://www.fokus.fhg.de/satcom

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Free World Dialup.

2003-08-26 Thread Deon George
G'day Asteriskers,

I've been looking through google to see how to get asterisk and free world 
dialup working together - I'm not having much luck.

When I dial a FWD number (via my SIP FWD definition), I hear the first 1/4 
second (or so) of sound, then nothing (but I still stay connected)... Does 
this make sense to anybody?

I know my FWD connection is working, because when I call myself via 
iaxtel, using the 170099 (FWD) number, I hear my voicemail.

Appreciate any tips...

...deon
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Decent DECT cordless compatible with Asterisk/ATA?

2003-08-26 Thread Dan
Hi,

Can anyone recommend me a decent DECT cordless phone with the following
minimal features:
- Caller ID with graphical display for both Name and Number (compatible with
*/ATA)
- min.14 days autonomy (without calls)
- backlight for display and keys
- good quality keyboard (I have two models of Philips Onis phones now and
the quality of the rubber keyboard is unacceptable)
- no answering machine included (use Asterisk Voicemail System)
- graphical Message Waiting indicator (compatible with */ATA), in order not
to be forced to use the different dialtone type of signaling
- keep a list of the lost calls (min. 10) with the callerid information

Thanks,
Dan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] * server based Phonebook

2003-08-26 Thread Dan
Hi,

There is any phonebook type application/script available, server based?
I want to keep the list of names/phone numbers centralized on the server (in
a database) for all the phones connected to Asterisk.
The caller ID extracted from the list must be passed then to the phones when
a call is received through the X100P card from the PSTN line.

Thanks,
Da

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Secondary gatekeeper support by asterisk h323drivers

2003-08-26 Thread Michael Manousos
Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
Hi,

I'm wondering if there are any plans on adding secondary gatekeeper
support to asterisk h323 channel drivers.
Nice to have something like this.
I 'll add it to the TODO features of asterisk-oh323.
Also I've noticed that chan_h323 is crashing asterisk at startup if 
primary gatekeeper is not available. Wouldn't it be a more correct 
behavior if it doesn't crashing but continue registration attempts in
the background? Didn't test it with chan_oh323.
There is no such problem with chan_oh323.

Thank you.

Michael

Michael.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] bug report: whitespaces in uris

2003-08-26 Thread Jiri Kuthan
FYI: Asterisk puts URIs in messages which violates the SIP spec and 
can't be accepted by URI parsers: username includes a whitespace.
See for example the From header field. Attached is example of an
incorrect message and related parts of RFC3261 specification. 

(Who doesn't want to dig into parser details may want to realize
 that whitespaces are used as uri delimitors in first request
 line and can't thus be a uri part.)

I would recommend that the stack generally validates URIs for
such glitches and uses other word for no callId. anonymous
is in frequent use by other software.

-jiri

OPTIONS sip:195.37.77.101 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 24.172.18.166:5060;branch=z9hG4bK03be4cf3
From: No CallID sip:No [EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as2746f4f3
To: sip:195.37.77.101
Contact: sip:No [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 OPTIONS
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Content-Length: 0

3261:
From-name_addr|addr_spec
addr_spec-SIP_URI
SIP_URI-userinfo
user_info-user
user-1*( unreserved / escaped / user-unreserved 
user-unreserved  =   / = / + / $ / , / ; / ? / /
unreserved  =  alphanum / mark
mark=  - / _ / . / ! / ~ / * / '
 / ( / )


--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
iptel.org -- creaters of the fastest SIP server  

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] * server based Phonebook

2003-08-26 Thread Jiri Kuthan
we run such at iptel.org -- just get an account there and see how it
works. Limitation: it takes phones with REFER support. We tested against
Cisco 7960, Mitel, Pingtel (and maybe some more whose name I no longer
remember). Microsfot Messenger is known not to work, as it is
REFER-ignorant.

-jiri

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Dan wrote:

 Hi,

 There is any phonebook type application/script available, server based?
 I want to keep the list of names/phone numbers centralized on the server (in
 a database) for all the phones connected to Asterisk.
 The caller ID extracted from the list must be passed then to the phones when
 a call is received through the X100P card from the PSTN line.

 Thanks,
 Da

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] * server based Phonebook

2003-08-26 Thread Dan
Hi Jiri,

Why is this phone dependant?
It is jut about to query a database for a specific phone number and then
extract the Name and set the variable CALLERID variable accordingly.
How can I see how it works? I can see just the result...

Thanks,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: Jiri Kuthan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] * server based Phonebook


 we run such at iptel.org -- just get an account there and see how it
 works. Limitation: it takes phones with REFER support. We tested against
 Cisco 7960, Mitel, Pingtel (and maybe some more whose name I no longer
 remember). Microsfot Messenger is known not to work, as it is
 REFER-ignorant.

 -jiri

 On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Dan wrote:

  Hi,
 
  There is any phonebook type application/script available, server based?
  I want to keep the list of names/phone numbers centralized on the server
(in
  a database) for all the phones connected to Asterisk.
  The caller ID extracted from the list must be passed then to the phones
when
  a call is received through the X100P card from the PSTN line.
 
  Thanks,
  Da
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] * server based Phonebook

2003-08-26 Thread Tjardick van der Kraan
I think your are looking for something like this tool:

LookupCIDName

it uses the internal database of asterisk and allows you to hookup the
CallerIDName based on a list in the database.

show application LookupCIDName

in * for more info.

Greetings,

Tj
- Original Message - 
From: Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 1:22 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] * server based Phonebook


 Hi,

 There is any phonebook type application/script available, server based?
 I want to keep the list of names/phone numbers centralized on the server
(in
 a database) for all the phones connected to Asterisk.
 The caller ID extracted from the list must be passed then to the phones
when
 a call is received through the X100P card from the PSTN line.

 Thanks,
 Da

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: T100P/ TSU 600 installation problem

2003-08-26 Thread jerk face
I am using a crossover cable.
My channel definitions are:
fxoks=1-22
fxsks=23-24
in zaptel.conf


--- Alex Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 What cable are you using, The SU600 to Digium cards
 need a crossover
 cable.
 
 1 to 4
 2 to 5
 4 to 1
 5 to 2
 
 That would stop it from not working,
 
 also make sure that you have a span definition on
 the zaptel.con file.
 
 
 
 Message: 7
 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
 From: jerk face [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] T100P/ TSU 600
 installation problem
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Each port is set to the proper signalling type (FXO,
 FXS).  I can't find any other options for the
 individual ports.
 As for the timing and configuration of NI, I have
 tried 
 NI:
 Timing Mode as both DTE and NI (my only choices)
 
 Where else should I be checking?
 (Before this morning, I hadn't even seen a channel
 bank before, so I'm a little lost at the moment).
 
 Thanks for your time.
 
 --- Wade Weppler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Have you configured the TSU600 properly?  You have
  to allocate each FXO/FXS
  channel to a timeslot before it will work.  This
 is
  not automatically done
  (like the Adtran Total Access series).
  
  Mind you, you should still have a sync light on
 the
  T1 card...
  
  -wade
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:asterisk-users-
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jerk face
   Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:01 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] T100P/ TSU 600
  installation problem
   
   My zapata.conf is located in /etc/asterisk and
 my
   zaptel.conf is located in the /etc directory.
   
   --- Adams, Gavin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -Original Message-
 From: jerk face
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
 I seem to be having a problem with the T100P
  card.
 So
 far I have done the following:

 vi zaptel.conf
 fxoks=1-22
 fxsks=23-24
 ...

 vi zapata.conf
 ...
 signalling=fxo_ks
 ...
 channel = 1-22
 ...
 signalling=fxs_ks
 ...
 channel = 23-24

 I then run
 modprobe zaptel
 modprobe wct1xxp
 ztcfg -vv

 There are no errors to report.  In
  /proc/zaptel/1
all
 of the configured channels are listed.
   
Crazy question, is zaptel.conf is /etc or
/etc/asterisk? If the latter,
try:
   
ztcfg -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf -vvv
   
--- Gavin
   
   
 ___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
  
 

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: T100P/ TSU 600 installation problem

2003-08-26 Thread jerk face
Oops ... I found out my problem
span=

--- jerk face [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am using a crossover cable.
 My channel definitions are:
 fxoks=1-22
 fxsks=23-24
 in zaptel.conf
 
 
 --- Alex Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  What cable are you using, The SU600 to Digium
 cards
  need a crossover
  cable.
  
  1 to 4
  2 to 5
  4 to 1
  5 to 2
  
  That would stop it from not working,
  
  also make sure that you have a span definition on
  the zaptel.con file.
  
  
  
  Message: 7
  Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
  From: jerk face [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] T100P/ TSU 600
  installation problem
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Each port is set to the proper signalling type
 (FXO,
  FXS).  I can't find any other options for the
  individual ports.
  As for the timing and configuration of NI, I have
  tried 
  NI:
  Timing Mode as both DTE and NI (my only choices)
  
  Where else should I be checking?
  (Before this morning, I hadn't even seen a channel
  bank before, so I'm a little lost at the moment).
  
  Thanks for your time.
  
  --- Wade Weppler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Have you configured the TSU600 properly?  You
 have
   to allocate each FXO/FXS
   channel to a timeslot before it will work.  This
  is
   not automatically done
   (like the Adtran Total Access series).
   
   Mind you, you should still have a sync light on
  the
   T1 card...
   
   -wade
   
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jerk face
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] T100P/ TSU 600
   installation problem

My zapata.conf is located in /etc/asterisk and
  my
zaptel.conf is located in the /etc directory.

--- Adams, Gavin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  -Original Message-
  From: jerk face
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


  I seem to be having a problem with the
 T100P
   card.
  So
  far I have done the following:
 
  vi zaptel.conf
  fxoks=1-22
  fxsks=23-24
  ...
 
  vi zapata.conf
  ...
  signalling=fxo_ks
  ...
  channel = 1-22
  ...
  signalling=fxs_ks
  ...
  channel = 23-24
 
  I then run
  modprobe zaptel
  modprobe wct1xxp
  ztcfg -vv
 
  There are no errors to report.  In
   /proc/zaptel/1
 all
  of the configured channels are listed.

 Crazy question, is zaptel.conf is /etc or
 /etc/asterisk? If the latter,
 try:

   ztcfg -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf -vvv

 --- Gavin


  ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   
  
 

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
 design software
 http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] * server based Phonebook

2003-08-26 Thread Dan
Thanks,

This is what I looking for.

Best regards,
Dan

- Original Message - 
From: Tjardick van der Kraan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] * server based Phonebook


 I think your are looking for something like this tool:

 LookupCIDName

 it uses the internal database of asterisk and allows you to hookup the
 CallerIDName based on a list in the database.

 show application LookupCIDName

 in * for more info.

 Greetings,

 Tj
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 1:22 PM
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] * server based Phonebook


  Hi,
 
  There is any phonebook type application/script available, server based?
  I want to keep the list of names/phone numbers centralized on the server
 (in
  a database) for all the phones connected to Asterisk.
  The caller ID extracted from the list must be passed then to the phones
 when
  a call is received through the X100P card from the PSTN line.
 
  Thanks,
  Da

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] unsubscribe

2003-08-26 Thread Francisco Perez-Landaeta
unsubscribe
- Original Message - 
From: jerk face [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: T100P/ TSU 600 installation problem


 Oops ... I found out my problem
 span=
 
 --- jerk face [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I am using a crossover cable.
  My channel definitions are:
  fxoks=1-22
  fxsks=23-24
  in zaptel.conf
  
  
  --- Alex Lopez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
   What cable are you using, The SU600 to Digium
  cards
   need a crossover
   cable.
   
   1 to 4
   2 to 5
   4 to 1
   5 to 2
   
   That would stop it from not working,
   
   also make sure that you have a span definition on
   the zaptel.con file.
   
   
   
   Message: 7
   Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
   From: jerk face [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] T100P/ TSU 600
   installation problem
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   Each port is set to the proper signalling type
  (FXO,
   FXS).  I can't find any other options for the
   individual ports.
   As for the timing and configuration of NI, I have
   tried 
   NI:
   Timing Mode as both DTE and NI (my only choices)
   
   Where else should I be checking?
   (Before this morning, I hadn't even seen a channel
   bank before, so I'm a little lost at the moment).
   
   Thanks for your time.
   
   --- Wade Weppler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you configured the TSU600 properly?  You
  have
to allocate each FXO/FXS
channel to a timeslot before it will work.  This
   is
not automatically done
(like the Adtran Total Access series).

Mind you, you should still have a sync light on
   the
T1 card...

-wade

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jerk face
 Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:01 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] T100P/ TSU 600
installation problem
 
 My zapata.conf is located in /etc/asterisk and
   my
 zaptel.conf is located in the /etc directory.
 
 --- Adams, Gavin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
   -Original Message-
   From: jerk face
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
   I seem to be having a problem with the
  T100P
card.
   So
   far I have done the following:
  
   vi zaptel.conf
   fxoks=1-22
   fxsks=23-24
   ...
  
   vi zapata.conf
   ...
   signalling=fxo_ks
   ...
   channel = 1-22
   ...
   signalling=fxs_ks
   ...
   channel = 23-24
  
   I then run
   modprobe zaptel
   modprobe wct1xxp
   ztcfg -vv
  
   There are no errors to report.  In
/proc/zaptel/1
  all
   of the configured channels are listed.
 
  Crazy question, is zaptel.conf is /etc or
  /etc/asterisk? If the latter,
  try:
 
  ztcfg -c /etc/asterisk/zaptel.conf -vvv
 
  --- Gavin
 
 
   ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

   
  
 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  
  __
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
  design software
  http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
 http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Accountcode and cdr-csv

2003-08-26 Thread Eduardo Goncalves
Hello,

Why does not accountcode apeer in cdr-csv? Could anyone help?



,710,01332213334,striped,710,SIP/-0810ee00,Zap/1-1,Dial,Zap/g1/01332213334,2003-08-26
 10:01:59,2003-08-26 10:02:08,2003-08-26 10:02:11,12,3,ANSWERED,DOCUMENTATION

===sip.conf==
[ata]
type=friend
context=striped
host=10.0.11.160
dtmfmode=inband
accountcode=pd

thanks
Eduardo
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] unsubscribe

2003-08-26 Thread Steven Critchfield
Please read either the headers of this message, or the footer.

DO NOT SEND ANOTHER UNSUBSCRIBE TO THE LIST.



On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 08:39, FRANCISCO PEREZ-LANDAETA wrote:
 unsubscribe
 
 
 From: Adam Roach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP vs SCCP vs XML
 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:40:59 -0500
 
 I'll start by mentioning that the newer Cisco SIP dumps
 let you hit # instead of Dial when you're done dialing,
 which I find to be much more intuitive than the Dial
 softbutton.
 
   Good question..   Does * support overlap dialing with SIP?
  
   I have a feeling it does, I do vaguely remember getting an
   Address Incomplete response when not dialing enough
   digits.  I guess all you have to do is set your Cisco
   phone for overlap dialing.  Hopefully there is an option
   for it in is config.
 
 Even if Asterisk does the overlap stuff defined in RFC 3578,
 I seriously doubt you'll see the Cisco phones (or any hardware
 phones, for that matter) doing it. The overlap stuff is really
 designed for gateways from the PSTN, not end terminals.
 
 That said, there's nothing that would *prevent* implementing
 it in end devices. I note that it would cause an awful lot
 of signaling traffic if you did so, though.
 
 As a side note, I'll point out that the Pingtel phones let
 you provision client-side digitmaps. Based on asterisk-like
 pattern matching, you get to say how long a digit string
 should be matched, and the phone will automatically dial
 when it matches (no need to hit send!). You can even make
 different patterns go different places, like:
 
 972xxx : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 214xxx : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 489xxx : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 1xx : sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 (To clarify: Dallas has three local area codes and 10 digit
 local dialing)
 
 /a
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 _
 MSN 8: Get 6 months for $9.95/month. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Problem starting Asterisk after abnormal shutdown

2003-08-26 Thread Lee Goodman



I've seen this happen a few times and I think it's 
when the system that Asterisk is running on crashes due 
to a power failure (or for some other reason that 
causes a non-planned shutdown).

While Linux comes up fine, Asterisk won't start 
because the drivers are loadingin the wrong order. fixed by: 
1) sh /usr/src/fix-asterisk-modules.sh 2) sh /etc/init.d/asterisk 
start

Is this a known problem? Is there an existing bug 
on this or should I open one up?
Anyone else seen this problem?

Thanks

Lee Goodman



[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk internal database access

2003-08-26 Thread Dan
Hi,


There is any simple way to have external access to the Asterisk database?
I want to be able to edit a specific family only, which is a phonebook.

Thanks,
Dan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Grandstream firmware update DMTF Payload Type

2003-08-26 Thread Ian Blenke
marrandy wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2003 03:37 pm, Ian Blenke wrote:
What NTP issue? My 1.0.3.78 phones are NATting out just fine.
Ian, I also had no NTP issues with NAT, but from what I remember when I 
perused the archives back in June/July, there were issues if you changed from 
the default NTP server.

Perhap's that's what they mean.

Elaborations welcomed.

Regards...Martin
The phones came pre-configured with sipphone.com's NTP server.

I've been using our own NTP servers for testing with 1.0.3.78, behind a 
linux iptables NATting firewall, with no apparent issues.

I've just verified with ethereal that the NTP packets do indeed hit our 
NTP servers, and the reply does set the time correctly on the phone's 
display.

Count me as someone who has not experienced this problem. YMMV.

--
- Ian C. Blenke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(This message bound by the following:
http://www.nks.net/email_disclaimer.html)
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP vs SCCP vs XML

2003-08-26 Thread Jared Smith
Checkout the dialplan.xml file...

Jared Smith

On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 16:45, Ray Burkholder wrote:
  
  No, this is not the case currently with any of the Cisco SIP software 
  loads that I am aware of.  If you find this to be incorrect, please 
  let the list know.  Cisco has not deployed much of the featureset in 
  their SCCP phones (such as paging/intercom) into the SIP phones due 
  to lack of standards/interest/political capital.
  
  JT
 
 
 Ok, after further research in the 7960 administrators guide for SIP 5.1
 (current is 5.3 and probably not changed much), they do state that
 support is not provided for CiscoIPPhoneExecute in the current SIP load,
 which is needed to make streaming channel 1 work.  Bummer.
 
 So, in looking around at HotDispatch.com, I see a number of companies
 charging outrageous dollars for their own SCCP versions of a softphone.
 
 Also, a while back, for $1000, a person could join Cisco's developer
 program and gain access to SCCP docs.  Perhaps an Asterisk group member
 has the funds available to attempt joining?  Then we could finish up on
 some of the aborted attempts at SCCP integration, if the license
 agreement allows this sort of development.
 
 Perhaps, through a little creativity, it might be possible to use a SCCP
 796x phone and not worry about SCCP.  With XML, screens could be
 programmed to send responses back to *.  Then * could drive streaming
 channel 1 directly and simulate the phone call.  So, on a SCCP phone,
 you don't use SCCP, nor SIP.  You use XML.  Would that work?  Hopefully
 soft button presses don't interfere with the streaming media.
 
 Oh, and if it does work, then you can use multicasting to intercom a
 number of phones simultaneously.
 
 The thing I miss on SIP phones that was available on the Callmanager
 version of 796x, is the ability to go off hook, dial some numbers, and
 callmanager automatically dials the call.  The SIP version requires you
 to go off hook, dial the digits, then press dial.  Any way around this
 for 4, 7, 10 or 11 digit dialling?
 
 Ray Burkholder
 519 570 0689 x2002
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] More questions. Call Waiting and Threeway

2003-08-26 Thread Steven J. Sobol

I can't do threeway from my Grandstream phone. Looking through the server
config files, I figured out why - zapata.conf has Threeway turned off for
the channels I use. 

I do my work on someone else's Asterisk box and don't want to modify 
zapata.conf for several reasons, the biggest being that the guy who owns
the box has a couple clients using it and I am deathly afraid of breaking
something (plus, I'm still not up to speed on the hardware/telco end of
the setup - all of the work I'm doing is with software).

Is there any way to control whether three-way and caller ID are enabled
per-call or per-SIP-phone? What I'd like to do is, for example, be able to
dial *70 from my SIP phone to turn off call waiting, or be able to enable
three-way on a per-phone basis.

I don't know what's on the other side of the Zap channels (i.e. PRI, CT-1,
whatever), but if it makes a difference, I can find out.

-- 
JustThe.net Internet  Multimedia Services
22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950 
Steve Sobol, Proprietor 
888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Speex Problem

2003-08-26 Thread San Mehat

Hey all,

  I'm current experiencing a problem when attempting to make a speex
call from X-Lite to Asterisk...

When I attempt to call an extension with the demo configuration, I get
no audio (only with speex), and after awhile my
/var/log/asterisk/messages fills up with this:

Aug 26 12:18:53 WARNING[122894]: File codec_speex.c, Line 167
(speextolin_framein): Out of buffer space


Here is a brief cut from the messages log for the entire transaction..
Aug 26 12:22:08 DEBUG[57352]: File chan_sip.c, Line 3783 (check_user):
Setting NAT on RTP to 0
Aug 26 12:22:08 DEBUG[57352]: File chan_sip.c, Line 540 (__sip_ack):
Stopping retransmission on
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' of Response
30335: Found
Aug 26 12:22:09 DEBUG[57352]: File chan_sip.c, Line 3783 (check_user):
Setting NAT on RTP to 0
Aug 26 12:22:09 DEBUG[57352]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4807
(handle_request): Check for res
Aug 26 12:22:09 DEBUG[57352]: File chan_sip.c, Line 952 (find_user):
Call from user 'nettwerk' is 1 out of 0
Aug 26 12:22:09 DEBUG[57352]: File chan_sip.c, Line 3249 (build_route):
build_route: Contact hop: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060
Aug 26 12:22:09 DEBUG[139278]: File rtp.c, Line 1007 (ast_rtp_write):
Ooh, format changed from UNKN to SPEEX
Aug 26 12:22:09 DEBUG[57352]: File chan_sip.c, Line 540 (__sip_ack):
Stopping retransmission on
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' of Response
30336: Found
Aug 26 12:22:23 WARNING[139278]: File codec_speex.c, Line 167
(speextolin_framein): Out of buffer space
Aug 26 12:22:23 WARNING[139278]: File codec_speex.c, Line 167
(speextolin_framein): Out of buffer space
Aug 26 12:22:23 WARNING[139278]: File codec_speex.c, Line 167
(speextolin_framein): Out of buffer space
Aug 26 12:22:23 WARNING[139278]: File codec_speex.c, Line 167
(speextolin_framein): Out of buffer space
Aug 26 12:22:23 WARNING[139278]: File codec_speex.c, Line 167
(speextolin_framein): Out of buffer space
Aug 26 12:22:23 WARNING[139278]: File codec_speex.c, Line 167
(speextolin_framein): Out of buffer space


I *know* speex is supported by asterisk, so I must be doing something
dumb.. lol

Any help would be appreciated

-san


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Secondary gatekeeper support by asterisk h323 drivers

2003-08-26 Thread Michael Ulitskiy
Great! Thanks, Michael.
Jeremy, what do you think?

Michael

On Tuesday 26 August 2003 07:53 am, Michael Manousos wrote:
 Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
  Hi,
  
  I'm wondering if there are any plans on adding secondary gatekeeper
  support to asterisk h323 channel drivers.
 
 Nice to have something like this.
 I 'll add it to the TODO features of asterisk-oh323.
 
  Also I've noticed that chan_h323 is crashing asterisk at startup if 
  primary gatekeeper is not available. Wouldn't it be a more correct 
  behavior if it doesn't crashing but continue registration attempts in
  the background? Didn't test it with chan_oh323.
 
 There is no such problem with chan_oh323.
 
  Thank you.
  
  Michael
  
 
 Michael.
 
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk internal database access

2003-08-26 Thread John Todd
Hi,

There is any simple way to have external access to the Asterisk database?
I want to be able to edit a specific family only, which is a phonebook.
Thanks,
Dan
A search thorough the archives of only 17 days ago found this:

JT

Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] UNIX command-line interaction with astdb
From: Benjamin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 12:54:08 -0500
As far as I understand you do not want to open this DB while Asterisk
has it open.
Even though it is in standard db1 format.
A project _way_ down my list was to write some perl DBI commands that
allowed access to the asterisk db via the manager interface.
However, for now, I am looking at implementing most of my DB needs in an
external postgres database.   This allows for mulitple asterisk boxes to
access it via an asterisk native app or an agi app, as well as external
programs.
If you really need to access the astdb, you might want to pursue doing
it through the manager interface.
Ben
-Original Message-
From: John Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 8:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] UNIX command-line interaction with astdb


I'm wondering if there is any command-line interface available for
working with values stored in astdb.  Of course, I can run asterisk
-rx database show  or other commands like that, but I was hoping
for a local command that would allow manipulation or output in some
other form.  Is astdb in a standard db format?
JT
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] 0 out of voicemail to different secretaries

2003-08-26 Thread Don Pobanz
On Monday, August 25, 2003 4:55 PM, Brad Bergman 
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I certainly contemplated that very thing... but somehow it escaped
 implementation.

 Even as things are now, the PBX administrator can set something like
 this up
 by putting engineering, accounting, etc in different contexts, and
 setting
 different o extensions for them.

This does not appear to be an alternative since a channel is assigned a 
context before the call is made, not after the number is dialed so the 
dialed number does not establish the context. So putting phones (or 
channels) in different contexts would only help if the context can be 
changed during a call.


 I was thinking of a couple of relevant features, one giving the
 individual
 mailbox user the ability to store a different extension (i.e., the
 target
 attendant) in the database that would override the o extension in
 the
 dialplan when a caller presses '0'. The other is to allow another
 number(s)
 to be stored in the DB so that a caller could press, say, 4, 5, or 6,
 and be
 transferred to whatever number the mailbox owner has stored there. Of
 course,
 all of this subject to whatever restrictions are imposed on the use 
of
 these
 features.

 I will look into this.

I hope your schedule and motivation leads you to look into this further 
as it will be important for us. We will be converting fully to * as 
soon as we can satisfy internal users that * can handle our 
requirements.

Please let me know if I can help with testing.

Don Pobanz


 Cheers,
 Brad


 On Mon 25 Aug 2003 14:25, Brian West wrote:
  http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=156
 
  patients grass hopper!
 
  bkw
 
  On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Don Pobanz wrote:
   Is it possible to configure * so that if a caller reaches
   voicemail for
   someone in Engineering, but doesn't want to leave a message they
   can
   press zero (0) and reach the Engineering Secretary or if they are
   calling someone in Accounting and reach voicemail, pressing '0'
   would
   reach the Accounting secretary, not the Engineering secretary?
  
   Don Pobanz

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Pickup groups with SIP

2003-08-26 Thread Jared Smith
I upgraded to the latest and greatest from CVS today, and now SIP pickup
groups appear to be broken.  Can anyone else tell me whether or not
they're seeing the same problem.  If anyone out there can verify the
problem, I'll submit it as a bug.

Jared Smith

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] x100P: Ring/off-hook in strange state 6 on channel1

2003-08-26 Thread Dan Fernandez



All of a sudden I am getting the following warning 
"Ring/off-hook in strange state 6 on channel1" from chan_zap.c and I cannot 
answer calls. I can place calls out without a problem though.

Any ideas what can be the problem. I have checked 
zapata.conf and zaptel.conf and they both seem fine.

Thanks in advance.
Dan




RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dialed Number Identification in analog hunt group

2003-08-26 Thread Don Pobanz
On Tuesday, August 26, 2003 4:55 PM, Stephen R. Besch 
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Does anyone out there know if it is possible to discover the dialed
 number when a line in an analog hunt group rings?  I can't get a
 straight answer from our IT folks. We have a 5ess switch delivering 4
 analog lines which are in a simple hunt group servicing our lab.  I
 would like to have a different call attendant based on which number 
is
 dialed so that I can route the calls to the appropriate group.  I 
know
 that Asterisk can easily do this once I have the information to pass
 into the dial plan.  The problem is getting the information.  While I
 know that this is possible with T1, it is, unfortunately, a bit
 overkill
 for 4 lines. Anyone have any suggestions?

If they are pots lines in a hunt group, you won't be able to.

If they are analog DID trunks then the dialed number would be passed.

My guess is you have pots lines and there is no way to find out the 
dialed number.

Don Pobanz

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Secondary gatekeeper support by asterisk h323 drivers

2003-08-26 Thread Michael Ulitskiy
On Tuesday 26 August 2003 05:26 pm, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
 
 H.323 is no longer part of my own network, so I no longer have a built 
 in method to burn lots of time beating up a dying protocol and 
 unfortunately,  I have to dedicate myself to projects that directly 
 generate revenue. I'll see what I can do, but I can make no promises.

I understand. I hope it doesn't mean that chan_h323 is now unsupported.
 
 Sorry,
 
 Jeremy McNamara
 
 
 P.S. I could not duplicate any crash using my own (proprietary) 
 gatekeeper. Plus, I cannot do a thing without debug information.

This is output of asterisk startup with chan_h323 when gatekeeper is unavailable or
reject registration:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/asterisk# asterisk -cd
DEBUG[1024]: File config.c, Line 744 (__ast_load): No file to parse: 
/usr/local/asterisk/etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf
Asterisk CVS-08/05/03-16:15:37, Copyright (C) 1999-2001 Linux Support Services, Inc.
Written by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
  [chan_h323.so] = (The NuFone Network's Open H.323 Channel Driver)
  == Creating H.323 Endpoint
  == Setting default context to h323
  == Adding alias pbxb to endpoint
  == Adding Prefix 1212555 to endpoint
  == H.323 listener started
  *** Error registering with gatekeeper 192.168.0.7.
ERROR[1024]: File chan_h323.c, Line 1673 (load_module): Gatekeeper registration failed.
WARNING[1024]: File loader.c, Line 299 (ast_load_resource): chan_h323.so: load_module 
failed, returning -1
 == PWLib proces going down.
WARNING[1024]: File loader.c, Line 345 (load_modules): Loading module chan_h323.so 
failed!
Segmentation fault

 
 
 Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
 
 Great! Thanks, Michael.
 Jeremy, what do you think?
 
 Michael
 
 On Tuesday 26 August 2003 07:53 am, Michael Manousos wrote:
   
 
 Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I'm wondering if there are any plans on adding secondary gatekeeper
 support to asterisk h323 channel drivers.
   
 
 Nice to have something like this.
 I 'll add it to the TODO features of asterisk-oh323.
 
 
 
 Also I've noticed that chan_h323 is crashing asterisk at startup if 
 primary gatekeeper is not available. Wouldn't it be a more correct 
 behavior if it doesn't crashing but continue registration attempts in
 the background? Didn't test it with chan_oh323.
   
 
 There is no such problem with chan_oh323.
 
 
 
 Thank you.
 
 Michael
 
   
 
 Michael.
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Secondary gatekeeper support by asterisk h323drivers

2003-08-26 Thread Jeremy McNamara
H.323 is no longer part of my own network, so I no longer have a built 
in method to burn lots of time beating up a dying protocol and 
unfortunately,  I have to dedicate myself to projects that directly 
generate revenue. I'll see what I can do, but I can make no promises.

Sorry,

Jeremy McNamara

P.S. I could not duplicate any crash using my own (proprietary) 
gatekeeper. Plus, I cannot do a thing without debug information.





Michael Ulitskiy wrote:

Great! Thanks, Michael.
Jeremy, what do you think?
Michael

On Tuesday 26 August 2003 07:53 am, Michael Manousos wrote:
 

Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
   

Hi,

I'm wondering if there are any plans on adding secondary gatekeeper
support to asterisk h323 channel drivers.
 

Nice to have something like this.
I 'll add it to the TODO features of asterisk-oh323.
   

Also I've noticed that chan_h323 is crashing asterisk at startup if 
primary gatekeeper is not available. Wouldn't it be a more correct 
behavior if it doesn't crashing but continue registration attempts in
the background? Didn't test it with chan_oh323.
 

There is no such problem with chan_oh323.

   

Thank you.

Michael

 

Michael.

   

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Hardware Requirement for Asterisk PBX

2003-08-26 Thread Tarun Banka
Hello All,

I am newbie to Asterisk IP PBX Community. We are planning to use 
Asterisk IP PBX at our university campus. I would like to know 
what's the ideal hardware requirements for setting up Asterisk.

At present we have 12000 analog telphone lines, so goal is to use 
IP telephony on campus in future.

Thanks,
Tarun
___
Art meets Army ; Swapna Weds Capt. Rajsekhar.
Rediff Matchmaker strikes another interesting match !!
Visit http://matchmaker.rediff.com?2
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users