[Asterisk-Users] strange problem with SIP/voicemail

2004-04-19 Thread Matthew Simpson
I'm having a very strange problem I've been fighting with all day.  It's
2:30am, and I'm stuck.  I think the problem may lie with one of my SIP
providers, but I'm not sure.

I have two ways to call into my test Grandstream.  I can call a PSTN 360
area code number that will forward to my FWD number, which in turn is
registered with my * box on extension 2030.  If I call the 360 number,
everything works, my Grandstream rings, and if I don't answer, it goes to
voicemail and voicemail works.

I also have a PSTN 972 area code number that forwards directly to my * box.
If I call the 972 number, my Grandstream will ring, but if I don't answer,
it will give me silence for a bit, then I hear a click, my CLI interface
says that it is recording a message, but then it says:

Apr 19 02:21:20 WARNING[15373]: app_voicemail.c:1261 play_and_record: No
audio available on SIP/66.147.170.34-0811abe8??

Here is my exten map [actual phone number munged].  I have removed the
Grandstream from the exten for this example.  It makes no difference whether
the Grandstream gets rang or not:

exten = 9725551212,1,Answer
exten = 9725551212,2,Voicemail2(u1000)
exten = 9725551212,3,Hangup

Also, just for testing, I have added this extension:

exten = 2501,1,Voicemail2(u1000)
exten = 2501,2,Hangup

If I dial 2501 from my grandstream, voicemail works that way, too.

My questions:

1) Should I have the Answer in there or not?  It doesn't help to add or
remove it.  On the FWD number, I do not have an Answer.

2) I can get voicemail to work on the incoming 972 number if I change the
dialplan around and then do a restart gracefully.  Example:

exten = 9725551212,1,Answer
exten = 9725551212,2,Playback(transfer)
exten = 9725551212,3,Voicemail2(u1000)
exten = 9725551212,4,Hangup

It will work once, maybe twice, and then it won't work any more after that
until I fiddle with the dialplan again and do another restart.  On Saturday
when I thought I had all of this working, I dialed in at least ten times and
had no problems.

I originally was running a CVS from 03-14-04 now I am running 04-19-04, and
still have the same issue.

Anyone?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Matching variable-length extensions with chan_zap in overlap dialling

2004-04-19 Thread Apollon Koutlides
Jeremy McNamara wrote:

Try  exten = _0X.  --- notice the period

[m807oth]
exten = _80780780.,1,StripMSD(7)
exten = _0.,1,SetVar,clidest=${EXTEN}
exten = _0.,2,Goto(cli,s,1)

...noticed mine? :-) I've tried a combo-wildcard (with an X, as in your 
example) as well, with no results either. The code in chan_zap.c seems 
to confirm that in overlap digit transmission the channel driver doesn't 
check for multiple matches. The patch to check for 
multiple/ambiguous/possibly incomplete matches is trivial, but 
implementing the timeout is definitely not.

Apollon Koutlides
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Does RTP traffic go through Asterisk IP PBX ?

2004-04-19 Thread Fran Boon
PTCHEN wrote:
 Is there anybody knows if RTP traffic goes thru Asterisk IP PBX?
 If it is, it must limit the capacity of Asterisk. Do you know the 
 concurrent SIP call capacity?  
 And Is there any guy modify the source code to prevent this?

Can be done already:
http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+Letting+SIP+clients+connect+directly

F
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] CAPI Eicon Diva Server 4BRI

2004-04-19 Thread Sergio Serrano Revuelto
Hi all, 
I have a PC working with a DIVA Eicon Server 4BRI during a lot
of time. Now I can't make call but I can receive calls.

I load diva with command: divactrl load -c 1 -f ETSI -u -t 0
Country: Spain
Isdnmode: point to point

My capi.conf is the next:
[global]
mode=immediate
isdnmode=ptp
txgain=0.8
rxgain=0.5

[interfaces]
msn=952901652,952901987
incomingmsn=*
controller=1,2
softdtmf=0
context=default
echocancel=1
echotail=64
callgroup=1
devices=4

I obtnain next trace in console:


 -- Attempting call on CAPI/@952901987:B951014947||r for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2
(Retry 1)
-- data = @952901987:B951014947||r
-- capi request omsn = @952901987
  == found capi with omsn = 952901987
  == CAPI Call CAPI[contr1/952901987]/7 with B3  == CAPI Call
CAPI[contr1/952901987]/7 with B3-- creating pipe for PLCI=-1
-- CONNECT_CONF ID=001 #0x0f52 LEN=0014
  Controller/PLCI/NCCI= 0x301
  Info= 0x0

  == received CONNECT_CONF PLCI = 0x301 INFO = 0
  == DISCONNECT_IND PLCI=0x301 REASON=0x3302
-- CAPI Hangingup
-- removed pipe for PLCI = 0x301
Apr 19 12:03:17 NOTICE[25619]: pbx_spool.c:199 attempt_thread: Call
failed to go through, reason 1




Any idea?


Thanks in advance,
srsergio

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Strange CallerId behaviour with SIP

2004-04-19 Thread Joost Kraaijeveld
Hi all,

I want to see the name of the caller (if available) and not the number.

If I call from my IP phone to my software IP phone I see the name of the caller. If I 
call from the software phone to my IP phone I only see the number, not the name. If I 
call from IP phone to IP phone I only see the number. If I set the name explicitely 
using callerid = asrevieved in my sip .conf or if I use SetCallerID(${CALLERIDNAME}) 
I get aseterisk on my display. IAX calls seem to go OK.

Is this known behaviour or is my configuration wrong? If so, any hints for a sollution?



Groeten,

Joost Kraaijeveld
Askesis B.V.
Molukkenstraat 14
6524NB Nijmegen
tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277
fax: 024-3608416
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.askesis.nl
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] CAPI Eicon Diva Server 4BRI

2004-04-19 Thread Sergio Serrano Revuelto
Hi,

Executing divactrl dchannel -dmonitor -Debug I obtain the next messages:

MDL-ERROR(G)
SIG-EVENT  0A

MDL-ERROR(G)
SIG-EVENT  0A

MORE
SIG-X(045) 08 01 12 05 A1 04 03 80 90 A3 18 01 81 6C 0B 00 A0 39 35 32
39 30 31 39 38 37 70 0D 80 39 35 31 30 31 34 39 34 37 7C 7C 72 7D 02 91
81
 Q.931  CR12 SETUP
Sending complete
Bearer Capability 80 90 a3
Channel Id 81
Calling Party Number 00 a0 '952901987'
Called Party Number 80 '951014947||r'
HLC 91 81
MDL-ERROR(G)
SIG-EVENT  0A

SIG-EVENT  0A

EVENT: Call failed in State 'Call initiated'
 Link disconnected, TEI error
MDL-ERROR(G)
SIG-EVENT  0A

MDL-ERROR(G)
SIG-EVENT  0A

MDL-ERROR(G)
SIG-EVENT  0A



Any idea?

srsergio




-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Sergio
Serrano Revuelto
Enviado el: miércoles, 19 de mayo de 2004 12:00
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [Asterisk-Users] CAPI  Eicon Diva Server 4BRI


Hi all, 
I have a PC working with a DIVA Eicon Server 4BRI during a lot
of time. Now I can't make call but I can receive calls.

I load diva with command: divactrl load -c 1 -f ETSI -u -t 0
Country: Spain
Isdnmode: point to point

My capi.conf is the next:
[global]
mode=immediate
isdnmode=ptp
txgain=0.8
rxgain=0.5

[interfaces]
msn=952901652,952901987
incomingmsn=*
controller=1,2
softdtmf=0
context=default
echocancel=1
echotail=64
callgroup=1
devices=4

I obtnain next trace in console:


 -- Attempting call on CAPI/@952901987:B951014947||r for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2
(Retry 1)
-- data = @952901987:B951014947||r
-- capi request omsn = @952901987
  == found capi with omsn = 952901987
  == CAPI Call CAPI[contr1/952901987]/7 with B3  == CAPI Call
CAPI[contr1/952901987]/7 with B3-- creating pipe for PLCI=-1
-- CONNECT_CONF ID=001 #0x0f52 LEN=0014
  Controller/PLCI/NCCI= 0x301
  Info= 0x0

  == received CONNECT_CONF PLCI = 0x301 INFO = 0
  == DISCONNECT_IND PLCI=0x301 REASON=0x3302
-- CAPI Hangingup
-- removed pipe for PLCI = 0x301
Apr 19 12:03:17 NOTICE[25619]: pbx_spool.c:199 attempt_thread: Call
failed to go through, reason 1




Any idea?


Thanks in advance,
srsergio

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Accommodating multiple FWD users

2004-04-19 Thread Vic Cross
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Malcolm Taylor wrote:

 Can anyone suggest a way in which all users could dial the prefix 8 and *
 would automatically associate the correct FWD account for the outbound call?

I had to do something like this for outgoing calls over two different PSTN 
lines.  It's probably sub-optimal, but at least I did not have to do 
anything with database or other code...

 extensions.conf:  (watch for split / wrap on the last exten line)

[globals]
TRUNKCOMPANY=Zap/1
TRUNKCUSTOMER=Zap/1
TRUNKHOMELINE=Zap/2
PREFIXCOMPANY=
PREFIXCUSTOMER=*11*2#W
PREFIXHOMELINE=

[macro-trunkdial]
exten = s,1,Dial(${ARG2}/${ARG3}${ARG1})
exten = s,2,Congestion

[homeline]
include = allnumbers

[company]
include = allnumbers

[customer]
include = allnumbers

[allnumbers]
exten = 
_9.,1,Macro(trunkdial|${EXTEN:1}|${TRUNK${CONTEXT}}|${PREFIX${CONTEXT}})



In the technology configuration files (zapata.conf, sip.conf, etc) I put
the user into the relevant context for the line I want them to dial out
on.  (The ${PREFIX...} variable is used to control an override dialling
code, for example to select a long-distance provider or--in my case--to
charge calls to a second number on the line.)

I could probably make the macro a bit simpler by using ${MACROEXTEN}, 
${MACROCONTEXT}, etc instead of passing three arguments.  Maybe I'll look 
at that for version two.

Anyway, this saved me from duplicating all the outgoing definitions in my 
dialplan (it is a lot more complicated than the _9. I show above).  If 
you've already got different extens set up for the various FWD accounts, 
this method should not be too hard to adapt for your purposes.

Hope it helps,
Vic Cross
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Accommodating multiple FWD users

2004-04-19 Thread Eric Wieling
On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 20:37, Malcolm Taylor wrote:
 I have five SIP users on my * box, each of whom has his own FWD account.
 Right now I have my configuration set so that the first user dials the
 prefix 8 when calling to an FWD number, the second user dials the prefix 7
 and so on.  This way, the FWD user he is calling sees the correct Caller ID
 information.
 
 Can anyone suggest a way in which all users could dial the prefix 8 and *
 would automatically associate the correct FWD account for the outbound call?

Try using GoToIf [show application gotoif] in combination with
${CALLERIDNUM} [asterisk/doc/README.variables]

-- 
  Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Strange CallerId behaviour with SIP

2004-04-19 Thread Chris Lee
Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
Hi all,

I want to see the name of the caller (if available) and not the number.

If I call from my IP phone to my software IP phone I see the name of the caller. If I call from the software phone to my IP phone I only see the number, not the name. If I call from IP phone to IP phone I only see the number. If I set the name explicitely using callerid = asrevieved in my sip .conf or if I use SetCallerID(${CALLERIDNAME}) I get aseterisk on my display. IAX calls seem to go OK.

Is this known behaviour or is my configuration wrong? If so, any hints for a sollution?


Could be the phone, some phones dont do Alpha characters, the 
Grandstream for example can not display the name, only the number.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

2004-04-19 Thread Rich Adamson

 As someone who used to adjust hybrids for a living a number of years 
 ago, I can tell you, complex impedence matching is only a part of the 
 equation.

Same here.

 The most important part is proper gain structure.  If that's wrong no 
 there is no way to control echo.  No amount of tweaking of compensation 
 networks will bring one into balance... No Convolution processing can 
 control it.  On old style equipment i.e. stuff built by Tellabs, the 
 gain structure had to be right within about .5 DBm0.
 
 Alignment meant dialing up a milliwatt test signal, measuring that 
 signal at the 2 wire point and adjusting pads on the module so that the 
 4 wire transmit point was at a fixed and correct level.  If memory 
 serves, on an analog microwave system, 0 DBm into a module was supposed 
 to be -16 DBm on the 4 wire transmit point.  The picture below may 
 help to clarify:

A major part of the problem implementing * into a pstn environment is that 
few implementors actually understand transmission basics, a smaller 
percentage actually have the test gear to measure the values, and even 
a smaller number understand what impedence, DBm, noise levels, twisted 
pair, induction, etc, mean in terms of pstn interface performance.

Combine that with dropping an FXO interface into a pstn environment
where the transmission levels to the CO are basically unknown, SOHO 
impedence mismatches abound, bridged analog phone sets are commonplace,
and assumptions that plug-n-play applies across the board including the
x100p, its fairly obvious why so many people bad-mouth the hardware.

Its also interesting that in about eight months on this list no one has
asked what the milliwatt generator is for, how to find the telephone
number of the pstn generator, how to measure the levels or what the
objectives should be, etc.

The transmission levels that were noted in the original posting are those
associated with the analog toll network, but the principle still applies.

Maybe a couple of us should write a whitepaper for beginners on the topic.

Rich


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] SIP dropouts

2004-04-19 Thread Brad Waite
Howdy all...

When making SIP calls through my X100P from X-Lite to the PSTN I'm 
getting 3-5 second dropouts in both directions.  I've tried ulaw and 
GSM, but that doesn't seem to make a difference, and the * box is on my 
local net.

Here's my hardware: Celeron 2.4GHz, 512MB, Slackware 9.1, 2 X100P, 1 T100P.

Any ideas what could be happening, or pointers as to how to shoot this 
trouble?

Thanks,

Brad Waite
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

2004-04-19 Thread ast
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Rich Adamson wrote:
 Maybe a couple of us should write a whitepaper for beginners on the topic.

Yes Please do

 
 Rich
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

2004-04-19 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
 Combine that with dropping an FXO interface into a pstn environment
 where the transmission levels to the CO are basically unknown, SOHO
 impedence mismatches abound, bridged analog phone sets are commonplace,
 and assumptions that plug-n-play applies across the board including the
 x100p, its fairly obvious why so many people bad-mouth the hardware.

I am badmouthing the hardware because I can drop an Adit600 FXO port on to the 
exact same line and have an order of magnitude better chance of getting 
adequate voice quality out of it.  I am waiting for my FXO module to arrive 
so I can see if I have similar experiences with it.

The X100P is a cheap hybrid interface.  I am not arguing that point.  I also 
believe, however, that using the X100P and reselling that particular brand of 
WinModem is giving a *lot* of asterisk newcomers a very bad taste in their 
mouths.  It is my sincere hope that the TDM400P's FXO module is a 
significantly better hybrid and that the Dev Kit is simply a TDM400P with FXS 
and FXO modules.

There's always a tradeoff between cost and performance.  It is my opinion that 
the X100P was a bad choice.

 Its also interesting that in about eight months on this list no one has
 asked what the milliwatt generator is for, how to find the telephone
 number of the pstn generator, how to measure the levels or what the
 objectives should be, etc.

I am pretty sure that most people wouldn't have the means to measure and apply 
that knowlege.  I know what a milliwatt generator is used for and I have the 
means to measure and adjust the hybrid to get the desired result, but I 
didn't have the knowledge that yourself and Mr. Adamson have just brought to 
the list.  In other words, I didn't know _where_ I needed to adjust the 
values to.  It's especially interesting how the hybrid should NOT be adjusted 
to get 0dBm on the 4-wire side to eliminate echo.  I would not have guessed 
that.  I was also lucky enough not to need to live with the X100P for very 
long.

 Maybe a couple of us should write a whitepaper for beginners on the topic.

I think that would be an incredible nugget of knowledge for the Asterisk 
community.  I know that I've got yours and Mr. Ferrell's messages stored away 
in my knowledgebase.  :-)

Regards,
Andrew
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP dropouts

2004-04-19 Thread Brad Waite
Sorry, forgot to mention that I set up an extension to play back a long 
MP3.  Other than the occasional 20ms packet being dropped on the floor, 
no other detectable dropouts.

Again, thanks for any pointers.

Brad Waite
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Speaking digits and time...

2004-04-19 Thread Mark Elkins
-- Executing DateTime(SIP/phone1-07ff, ) in new stack
-- Playing '/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/digits/day-1' (language 'en')
-- Playing '/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/digits/mon-3' (language 'en')
-- Playing '/var/lib/asterisk/sounds/digits/h-19' (language 'en')

This works - the pathname is complete - Joy.



-- Executing SayDigits(SIP/phone1-0e7d, 203) in new stack
-- Playing 'digits/2' (language 'en')
-- Playing 'digits/0' (language 'en')
-- Playing 'digits/3' (language 'en')

This doesn't (silence). Path looks incomplete.

Where in the source do I fix this

-- 
  .  . ___. .__  Posix Systems - Sth Africa
 /| /|   / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  -  Mark J Elkins, Cisco CCIE
/ |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS  Tel: +27 12 807 0590  Cell: +27 82 601 0496



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Accommodating multiple FWD users

2004-04-19 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi!

  Can anyone suggest a way in which all users could dial the prefix 8 and *
  would automatically associate the correct FWD account for the outbound call?
 
 Try using GoToIf [show application gotoif] in combination with
 ${CALLERIDNUM} [asterisk/doc/README.variables]

I prefer a slightly cleaner method:

1. create a type=peer entry for each outgoing FWD account in sip.conf. 
For example you have [fwd-out_joe], [fwd-out_bob], [fwd-out_mary] where 
you specify the individual username, fromuser and password

2. in sip.conf put each of your local phone users into their own context 
like context=from-joe or context=from-mary

3. in extension.conf you do smth like include = default for each of 
those person contexts like [from-joe], and arrange a FWD dialout like
_8X. = Dial(SIP/{EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

If, however, you want to avoid individual contexts in extensions.conf you 
could instead us DBput() and DBget() lookup the correct fwd-out_xxx 
string based upon your local users's callerid.

Cheers, Philipp


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Advanced queueing

2004-04-19 Thread Gavin Hamill
Hullo :)

Please be gentle with me, I don't have a working * install, and am just 
looking for background information.

I'm always impressed by companies who implement a queue like You are now 
number N in the queue. There are currently M agents answering calls, and your 
call should be answered in approx. O minutes

I've seen on 
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+sound+files+additional
that Allison has recorded soundfiles to support this style of queue, but how 
do I make use of them in Asterisk?

Is there a pre-written application to implement this type of queue, or would 
it need to be an AGI-based affair?

Cheers,
Gavin.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

2004-04-19 Thread Jeremy Hall
I for one would love this.  I do not have any test equipment to
determine the level I am sending at, but if I could at least figure out
what levels to have my rxgain values set to, that would help.

I remember seeing somewhere that you can use a program (part of the zt
suite if I remember correctly) to view the audio levels on the FXO card
like an on-screen vu meter.  I can use that and dial up my telco
milliwatt test number and adjust accordingly.  I asked where that tool
was on the IRC channel, but they seemed to not know either.  I have
searched as I know I saw it, but can't find it again.

Please post a guide like this to the Wiki or some other location, and be
assured it will help at least one person out, probably many more.

-Original Message-
From: Rich Adamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 6:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?


 As someone who used to adjust hybrids for a living a number of years 
 ago, I can tell you, complex impedence matching is only a part of the 
 equation.

Same here.

 The most important part is proper gain structure.  If that's wrong no 
 there is no way to control echo.  No amount of tweaking of
compensation 
 networks will bring one into balance... No Convolution processing can 
 control it.  On old style equipment i.e. stuff built by Tellabs, the 
 gain structure had to be right within about .5 DBm0.
 
 Alignment meant dialing up a milliwatt test signal, measuring that 
 signal at the 2 wire point and adjusting pads on the module so that
the 
 4 wire transmit point was at a fixed and correct level.  If memory 
 serves, on an analog microwave system, 0 DBm into a module was
supposed 
 to be -16 DBm on the 4 wire transmit point.  The picture below may 
 help to clarify:

A major part of the problem implementing * into a pstn environment is
that 
few implementors actually understand transmission basics, a smaller 
percentage actually have the test gear to measure the values, and even 
a smaller number understand what impedence, DBm, noise levels, twisted 
pair, induction, etc, mean in terms of pstn interface performance.

Combine that with dropping an FXO interface into a pstn environment
where the transmission levels to the CO are basically unknown, SOHO 
impedence mismatches abound, bridged analog phone sets are commonplace,
and assumptions that plug-n-play applies across the board including the
x100p, its fairly obvious why so many people bad-mouth the hardware.

Its also interesting that in about eight months on this list no one has
asked what the milliwatt generator is for, how to find the telephone
number of the pstn generator, how to measure the levels or what the
objectives should be, etc.

The transmission levels that were noted in the original posting are
those
associated with the analog toll network, but the principle still
applies.

Maybe a couple of us should write a whitepaper for beginners on the
topic.

Rich


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Advanced queueing

2004-04-19 Thread Matthew Branton
Title: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Advanced queueing





Position and hold time announcements/settings are in queues.conf in the later cvs versions.



Matt


-Original Message-
From: Gavin Hamill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Advanced queueing



Hullo :)


Please be gentle with me, I don't have a working * install, and am just 
looking for background information.


I'm always impressed by companies who implement a queue like You are now 
number N in the queue. There are currently M agents answering calls, and your 
call should be answered in approx. O minutes


I've seen on 
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+sound+files+additional
that Allison has recorded soundfiles to support this style of queue, but how 
do I make use of them in Asterisk?


Is there a pre-written application to implement this type of queue, or would 
it need to be an AGI-based affair?


Cheers,
Gavin.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

2004-04-19 Thread Rich Adamson
 I for one would love this.  I do not have any test equipment to
 determine the level I am sending at, but if I could at least figure out
 what levels to have my rxgain values set to, that would help.
 
 I remember seeing somewhere that you can use a program (part of the zt
 suite if I remember correctly) to view the audio levels on the FXO card
 like an on-screen vu meter.  I can use that and dial up my telco
 milliwatt test number and adjust accordingly.  I asked where that tool
 was on the IRC channel, but they seemed to not know either.  I have
 searched as I know I saw it, but can't find it again.

The tool you're looking for is /usr/src/zaptel/ztmonitor

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztmonitor
Usage: ztmonitor channel num [-v] [-f FILE]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztmonitor 1 -v

Visual Audio Levels.

 Use zapata.conf file to adjust the gains if needed.

( # = Audio Level  * = Max Audio Hit )
(RX) (TX)
 ##*  

Keep in mind that tool is nothing more then an audio VU meter and was
not intended to be an accurate means of measuring transmission levels.
I think bkw (probably with Mark) wrote it back in the November/December
timeframe as a simple tool for adjusting rxgain, etc. About that same
time, the echo cancelling mechanism (for the x100p) was rewritten to
sense the audio reflection (or echo) during the first half-second or
so of an initial pstn call. (That was a substantial improvement over
previous cancellation methods without a doubt. If I recall recorrectly,
that mechanism was reduced to sending an outbound short duration pulse
or burst, and measuring the reflected energy. Sort of a snapshot at the
start of an analog call. It's okay, but certainly not the equivalent
of commercial analog cancellation products including mux's.)

I've not had to revisit the x100p gain adjustment effort for several
months, but seems to me that it was necessary to completely stop and
start * each time an adjustment was made to the rxgain/txgain settings
in zapata.conf (a simple reload wasn't adequate).

Rich


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Advanced queueing

2004-04-19 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Monday 19 April 2004 16:13, Matthew Branton wrote:
 Position and hold time announcements/settings are in queues.conf in the
 later cvs versions.

Superb - thanks for the speedy response :)

Cheers,
Gavin.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: asterisk database support (SIP_FRIENDS)

2004-04-19 Thread Stefan Tichy
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 05:36:06PM +0200, Brancaleoni Matteo wrote:
 simply, you can define sip friends from a database.
 just create the table, enable SIP_FRIENDS into channels

USE_SIP_MYSQL_FRIENDS=1


 Makefile and read chan_sip.c how to set
 db access (db access data must be into sip.conf)

dbname= ; Name of database
dbhost=localhost; Hostname of server 
dbuser= ; MySQL user name
dbpass= ; Password for dbuser

./contrib/scripts/sip-friends.sql can be used to create a sipfriends
table in the database. Select and update priviledges for the dbuser
on the sipfriends table are required.

Insert (name,secret,context) records into sipfriends. Default values
will be used for the other fields until your sip clients register.
The secret is plaintext.


But using MYSQL_FRIENDS is not just a replacement for a list of
configuration data in sip.conf or some file included from there.

CLI command sip show peers will not show anything and it is not
possible to specify additional options. dtmfmode=rfc2833 default
should work, account information may not be used, but there is no
mailbox notification to the phone. In the latter case it is not an
option which could be easily added by some minor modification in
chan_sip.c. 

If you need additonal options, look at retrieve_sip_conf_from_mysql.pl
It can be used to generate sip configuration from MySQL data.


-- 
Stefan Tichy   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Strange CallerId behaviour with SIP

2004-04-19 Thread Joost Kraaijeveld
 Could be the phone, some phones dont do Alpha characters, the
 Grandstream for example can not display the name, only the number.
No, IAX calls go OK. Also as mentioned in my previous mail, if I set the name 
explicitely using callerid = asrevieved in my sip .conf or if I use 
SetCallerID(${CALLERIDNAME}) I get asterisk on my display. So I assume that the 
phone can do Aplha characters.

Groeten,

Joost Kraaijeveld
Askesis B.V.
Molukkenstraat 14
6524NB Nijmegen
tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277
fax: 024-3608416
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.askesis.nl
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

2004-04-19 Thread Ed Rubright
The next question for me is: How do I found out my telco milliwatt test
number?  I'm in Washington State using Qwest.

The way I understand this, I'm to dialup the telco milliwatt test number and
adjust the rxgain values using ztmonitor tool until the Max Audio Hit is
in the middle of the bar graph for a normal conversation?

Thanks,
Ed

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

 I for one would love this.  I do not have any test equipment to 
 determine the level I am sending at, but if I could at least figure 
 out what levels to have my rxgain values set to, that would help.
 
 I remember seeing somewhere that you can use a program (part of the zt 
 suite if I remember correctly) to view the audio levels on the FXO 
 card like an on-screen vu meter.  I can use that and dial up my telco 
 milliwatt test number and adjust accordingly.  I asked where that tool 
 was on the IRC channel, but they seemed to not know either.  I have 
 searched as I know I saw it, but can't find it again.

The tool you're looking for is /usr/src/zaptel/ztmonitor

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztmonitor
Usage: ztmonitor channel num [-v] [-f FILE]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztmonitor 1 -v

Visual Audio Levels.

 Use zapata.conf file to adjust the gains if needed.

( # = Audio Level  * = Max Audio Hit )
(RX)
(TX)
 ##*  

Keep in mind that tool is nothing more then an audio VU meter and was not
intended to be an accurate means of measuring transmission levels.
I think bkw (probably with Mark) wrote it back in the November/December
timeframe as a simple tool for adjusting rxgain, etc. About that same time,
the echo cancelling mechanism (for the x100p) was rewritten to sense the
audio reflection (or echo) during the first half-second or so of an initial
pstn call. (That was a substantial improvement over previous cancellation
methods without a doubt. If I recall recorrectly, that mechanism was reduced
to sending an outbound short duration pulse or burst, and measuring the
reflected energy. Sort of a snapshot at the start of an analog call. It's
okay, but certainly not the equivalent of commercial analog cancellation
products including mux's.)

I've not had to revisit the x100p gain adjustment effort for several months,
but seems to me that it was necessary to completely stop and start * each
time an adjustment was made to the rxgain/txgain settings in zapata.conf (a
simple reload wasn't adequate).

Rich


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

2004-04-19 Thread Klaus-Peter Junghanns
Hi

Am Mo, 2004-04-19 um 16.50 schrieb Jeremy Hall:
 I remember seeing somewhere that you can use a program (part of the zt
 suite if I remember correctly) to view the audio levels on the FXO card
 like an on-screen vu meter.  I can use that and dial up my telco
 milliwatt test number and adjust accordingly.  I asked where that tool
 was on the IRC channel, but they seemed to not know either.  I have
 searched as I know I saw it, but can't find it again.
 
That would be ztmonitor, i guess:

silverbox:/usr/src/build/rc20/zaptel # ./ztmonitor 2 -v

Visual Audio Levels.

 Use zapata.conf file to adjust the gains if needed.

( # = Audio Level  * = Max Audio Hit )
(RX)
(TX)

best regards

Klaus
-- 
Klaus-Peter Junghanns

CEO, CTO
Junghanns.NET GmbH
Breite Strasse 13a - 12167 Berlin - Germany
fon: (de) +49 30 79705390
fon: (uk) +44 870 1244692
fax: (de) +49 30 79705391
iaxtel: 1-700-157-8753
http://www.Junghanns.NET/asterisk/


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Spanish translation

2004-04-19 Thread Jorge de Jesus Ramirez Sanchez
Hi!

Anyone know if there are a spanish translation?

Thanks!

Jorge de Jesus Ramirez Sanchez
Calle Jirafa # 3903.
Col. Lomas del Sol
C.P. 31167. Chihuahua, Chih. México.
Tel: +52 (614) 498-7223
Fax: +52 (614) 421-2306
Cel: +52 (614) 345-9098
url: http://kokey.gluch.org.mx
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

2004-04-19 Thread Dave Weis

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Jeremy Hall wrote:
 This may not be the case in all areas, but in my area with Qwest as
 well, all exchanges have the test at xxx-9996.  For example, my number
 is in the 208 area code, 459 exchange, so the full number would be
 208-459-9996.  It is not tied to any specific number, so I can use any
 exchange local to me such as 323-9996.  It may or may not work in your
 area, so try not to do it at 3:00 AM until you have verified the number.

I'm also in a Qwest area, but that number doesn't work here. All of the 
techs that I have asked gave it to me with no problems. They are shy about 
the automatic ANI number, however...

dave

 -Original Message-
 From: Ed Rubright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:51 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?
 
 The next question for me is: How do I found out my telco milliwatt test
 number?  I'm in Washington State using Qwest.
 
 The way I understand this, I'm to dialup the telco milliwatt test number
 and
 adjust the rxgain values using ztmonitor tool until the Max Audio Hit
 is
 in the middle of the bar graph for a normal conversation?
 
 Thanks,
 Ed
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
 Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:01 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?
 
  I for one would love this.  I do not have any test equipment to 
  determine the level I am sending at, but if I could at least figure 
  out what levels to have my rxgain values set to, that would help.
  
  I remember seeing somewhere that you can use a program (part of the zt
 
  suite if I remember correctly) to view the audio levels on the FXO 
  card like an on-screen vu meter.  I can use that and dial up my telco 
  milliwatt test number and adjust accordingly.  I asked where that tool
 
  was on the IRC channel, but they seemed to not know either.  I have 
  searched as I know I saw it, but can't find it again.
 
 The tool you're looking for is /usr/src/zaptel/ztmonitor
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztmonitor
 Usage: ztmonitor channel num [-v] [-f FILE]
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztmonitor 1 -v
 
 Visual Audio Levels.
 
  Use zapata.conf file to adjust the gains if needed.
 
 ( # = Audio Level  * = Max Audio Hit )
 (RX)
 (TX)
  ##*  
 
 Keep in mind that tool is nothing more then an audio VU meter and was
 not
 intended to be an accurate means of measuring transmission levels.
 I think bkw (probably with Mark) wrote it back in the November/December
 timeframe as a simple tool for adjusting rxgain, etc. About that same
 time,
 the echo cancelling mechanism (for the x100p) was rewritten to sense
 the
 audio reflection (or echo) during the first half-second or so of an
 initial
 pstn call. (That was a substantial improvement over previous
 cancellation
 methods without a doubt. If I recall recorrectly, that mechanism was
 reduced
 to sending an outbound short duration pulse or burst, and measuring the
 reflected energy. Sort of a snapshot at the start of an analog call.
 It's
 okay, but certainly not the equivalent of commercial analog cancellation
 products including mux's.)
 
 I've not had to revisit the x100p gain adjustment effort for several
 months,
 but seems to me that it was necessary to completely stop and start *
 each
 time an adjustment was made to the rxgain/txgain settings in zapata.conf
 (a
 simple reload wasn't adequate).
 
 Rich
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

-- 
Dave Weis I believe there are more instances of the abridgment
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent
  encroachments of those in power than by violent 
  and sudden usurpations.- James Madison
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

2004-04-19 Thread Ed Rubright
Hmmm...that doesn't work in my area either.  I'm in the 509 area code, 448
exchange with Qwest and dialing 509-448-9996 gave me the no service
announcement.

Perhaps calling Qwest customer service and asking for the milliwat test
number for my local calling area?

Ed 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Weis
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?


On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Jeremy Hall wrote:
 This may not be the case in all areas, but in my area with Qwest as 
 well, all exchanges have the test at xxx-9996.  For example, my number 
 is in the 208 area code, 459 exchange, so the full number would be 
 208-459-9996.  It is not tied to any specific number, so I can use any 
 exchange local to me such as 323-9996.  It may or may not work in your 
 area, so try not to do it at 3:00 AM until you have verified the number.

I'm also in a Qwest area, but that number doesn't work here. All of the
techs that I have asked gave it to me with no problems. They are shy about
the automatic ANI number, however...

dave

 -Original Message-
 From: Ed Rubright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:51 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?
 
 The next question for me is: How do I found out my telco milliwatt 
 test number?  I'm in Washington State using Qwest.
 
 The way I understand this, I'm to dialup the telco milliwatt test 
 number and adjust the rxgain values using ztmonitor tool until the 
 Max Audio Hit
 is
 in the middle of the bar graph for a normal conversation?
 
 Thanks,
 Ed
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich 
 Adamson
 Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:01 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?
 
  I for one would love this.  I do not have any test equipment to 
  determine the level I am sending at, but if I could at least figure 
  out what levels to have my rxgain values set to, that would help.
  
  I remember seeing somewhere that you can use a program (part of the 
  zt
 
  suite if I remember correctly) to view the audio levels on the FXO 
  card like an on-screen vu meter.  I can use that and dial up my 
  telco milliwatt test number and adjust accordingly.  I asked where 
  that tool
 
  was on the IRC channel, but they seemed to not know either.  I have 
  searched as I know I saw it, but can't find it again.
 
 The tool you're looking for is /usr/src/zaptel/ztmonitor
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztmonitor
 Usage: ztmonitor channel num [-v] [-f FILE]
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztmonitor 1 -v
 
 Visual Audio Levels.
 
  Use zapata.conf file to adjust the gains if needed.
 
 ( # = Audio Level  * = Max Audio Hit ) 
 (RX)
 (TX)
  ##*  
 
 Keep in mind that tool is nothing more then an audio VU meter and was 
 not intended to be an accurate means of measuring transmission levels.
 I think bkw (probably with Mark) wrote it back in the 
 November/December timeframe as a simple tool for adjusting rxgain, 
 etc. About that same time, the echo cancelling mechanism (for the 
 x100p) was rewritten to sense
 the
 audio reflection (or echo) during the first half-second or so of an 
 initial pstn call. (That was a substantial improvement over previous 
 cancellation methods without a doubt. If I recall recorrectly, that 
 mechanism was reduced to sending an outbound short duration pulse or 
 burst, and measuring the reflected energy. Sort of a snapshot at the 
 start of an analog call.
 It's
 okay, but certainly not the equivalent of commercial analog 
 cancellation products including mux's.)
 
 I've not had to revisit the x100p gain adjustment effort for several 
 months, but seems to me that it was necessary to completely stop and 
 start * each time an adjustment was made to the rxgain/txgain settings 
 in zapata.conf (a simple reload wasn't adequate).
 
 Rich
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

-- 
Dave Weis I believe there are more instances of the abridgment
[EMAIL 

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

2004-04-19 Thread Rich Adamson
For the record, the milliwatt generator, ANI number, etc, is up to each
telco engineering/operations group as to what number to assign to it.
There are no industry standards at all. Since the xx98 and xx99 numbers
use to be reserved for testing years ago, those numbers are still in 
frequent use. Also, some telco's use numbers like 311 for things like
this, however the 411, 511, 611, 911 range has been filling up rather 
rapidly with other public things, so probably not to likely anymore.

Easiest way to find them is to call Repair and ask. If that person can't
tell you, ask for their supervisor. If that doesn't work, the next time
you see a telephone truck, ask the driver; he's likely to be an employee
that uses it more frequently then most others.

Rich


 On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Jeremy Hall wrote:
  This may not be the case in all areas, but in my area with Qwest as
  well, all exchanges have the test at xxx-9996.  For example, my number
  is in the 208 area code, 459 exchange, so the full number would be
  208-459-9996.  It is not tied to any specific number, so I can use any
  exchange local to me such as 323-9996.  It may or may not work in your
  area, so try not to do it at 3:00 AM until you have verified the number.
 
 I'm also in a Qwest area, but that number doesn't work here. All of the 
 techs that I have asked gave it to me with no problems. They are shy about 
 the automatic ANI number, however...
 
 dave
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Ed Rubright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:51 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?
  
  The next question for me is: How do I found out my telco milliwatt test
  number?  I'm in Washington State using Qwest.
  
  The way I understand this, I'm to dialup the telco milliwatt test number
  and
  adjust the rxgain values using ztmonitor tool until the Max Audio Hit
  is
  in the middle of the bar graph for a normal conversation?
  
  Thanks,
  Ed
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
  Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:01 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?
  
   I for one would love this.  I do not have any test equipment to 
   determine the level I am sending at, but if I could at least figure 
   out what levels to have my rxgain values set to, that would help.
   
   I remember seeing somewhere that you can use a program (part of the zt
  
   suite if I remember correctly) to view the audio levels on the FXO 
   card like an on-screen vu meter.  I can use that and dial up my telco 
   milliwatt test number and adjust accordingly.  I asked where that tool
  
   was on the IRC channel, but they seemed to not know either.  I have 
   searched as I know I saw it, but can't find it again.
  
  The tool you're looking for is /usr/src/zaptel/ztmonitor
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztmonitor
  Usage: ztmonitor channel num [-v] [-f FILE]
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztmonitor 1 -v
  
  Visual Audio Levels.
  
   Use zapata.conf file to adjust the gains if needed.
  
  ( # = Audio Level  * = Max Audio Hit )
  (RX)
  (TX)
   ##*  
  
  Keep in mind that tool is nothing more then an audio VU meter and was
  not
  intended to be an accurate means of measuring transmission levels.
  I think bkw (probably with Mark) wrote it back in the November/December
  timeframe as a simple tool for adjusting rxgain, etc. About that same
  time,
  the echo cancelling mechanism (for the x100p) was rewritten to sense
  the
  audio reflection (or echo) during the first half-second or so of an
  initial
  pstn call. (That was a substantial improvement over previous
  cancellation
  methods without a doubt. If I recall recorrectly, that mechanism was
  reduced
  to sending an outbound short duration pulse or burst, and measuring the
  reflected energy. Sort of a snapshot at the start of an analog call.
  It's
  okay, but certainly not the equivalent of commercial analog cancellation
  products including mux's.)
  
  I've not had to revisit the x100p gain adjustment effort for several
  months,
  but seems to me that it was necessary to completely stop and start *
  each
  time an adjustment was made to the rxgain/txgain settings in zapata.conf
  (a
  simple reload wasn't adequate).
  
  Rich
  
  
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

2004-04-19 Thread Scott Stingel
Also, while you have that phone guy cornered, you might try and get the ANI
number - the one that reads back the number you're calling from.  Quite
useful if you're in the phone connection closet trying to locate your
pair.  Mine is 959-1122   (650 area code)

Cheers!
Scott 


Scott M. Stingel
President,
Emerging Voice Technology, Inc.
Palo Alto California  London England
www.evtmedia.com 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?

For the record, the milliwatt generator, ANI number, etc, is up to each
telco engineering/operations group as to what number to assign to it.
There are no industry standards at all. Since the xx98 and xx99 numbers use
to be reserved for testing years ago, those numbers are still in frequent
use. Also, some telco's use numbers like 311 for things like this, however
the 411, 511, 611, 911 range has been filling up rather rapidly with other
public things, so probably not to likely anymore.

Easiest way to find them is to call Repair and ask. If that person can't
tell you, ask for their supervisor. If that doesn't work, the next time you
see a telephone truck, ask the driver; he's likely to be an employee that
uses it more frequently then most others.

Rich


 On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Jeremy Hall wrote:
  This may not be the case in all areas, but in my area with Qwest as 
  well, all exchanges have the test at xxx-9996.  For example, my 
  number is in the 208 area code, 459 exchange, so the full number 
  would be 208-459-9996.  It is not tied to any specific number, so I 
  can use any exchange local to me such as 323-9996.  It may or may 
  not work in your area, so try not to do it at 3:00 AM until you have
verified the number.
 
 I'm also in a Qwest area, but that number doesn't work here. All of 
 the techs that I have asked gave it to me with no problems. They are 
 shy about the automatic ANI number, however...
 
 dave
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Ed Rubright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:51 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?
  
  The next question for me is: How do I found out my telco milliwatt 
  test number?  I'm in Washington State using Qwest.
  
  The way I understand this, I'm to dialup the telco milliwatt test 
  number and adjust the rxgain values using ztmonitor tool until the 
  Max Audio Hit
  is
  in the middle of the bar graph for a normal conversation?
  
  Thanks,
  Ed
  
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich 
  Adamson
  Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:01 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Intel 536ep as a FXO?
  
   I for one would love this.  I do not have any test equipment to 
   determine the level I am sending at, but if I could at least 
   figure out what levels to have my rxgain values set to, that would
help.
   
   I remember seeing somewhere that you can use a program (part of 
   the zt
  
   suite if I remember correctly) to view the audio levels on the FXO 
   card like an on-screen vu meter.  I can use that and dial up my 
   telco milliwatt test number and adjust accordingly.  I asked where 
   that tool
  
   was on the IRC channel, but they seemed to not know either.  I 
   have searched as I know I saw it, but can't find it again.
  
  The tool you're looking for is /usr/src/zaptel/ztmonitor
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztmonitor
  Usage: ztmonitor channel num [-v] [-f FILE]
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztmonitor 1 -v
  
  Visual Audio Levels.
  
   Use zapata.conf file to adjust the gains if needed.
  
  ( # = Audio Level  * = Max Audio Hit ) 
  (RX)
  (TX)
   ##*  
  
  Keep in mind that tool is nothing more then an audio VU meter and 
  was not intended to be an accurate means of measuring transmission 
  levels.
  I think bkw (probably with Mark) wrote it back in the 
  November/December timeframe as a simple tool for adjusting rxgain, 
  etc. About that same time, the echo cancelling mechanism (for the 
  x100p) was rewritten to sense
  the
  audio reflection (or echo) during the first half-second or so of an 
  initial pstn call. (That was a substantial improvement over previous 
  cancellation methods without a doubt. If I recall recorrectly, that 
  mechanism was reduced to sending an outbound short duration pulse or 
  burst, and measuring the reflected energy. Sort of a snapshot at the 
  start of an analog call.
  It's
  okay, but certainly not the equivalent of commercial analog 
  cancellation products including mux's.)
  
  I've not had to revisit the x100p gain adjustment effort for several 
  months, but seems to me that it was necessary to 

[Asterisk-Users] zaphfc

2004-04-19 Thread Paulo Loureiro
Hello list,

I'm trying to use zaphfc, the module loads ok, and it identifies the hfc
boards in the machine.
The problem is: whenever i try to ztcfg -vv I get the following:

8x--- 
Zaptel Configuration
==
 
SPAN 1: CCS/ AMI Build-out: 399-533 feet (DSX-1)
 
Channel map:
 
Channel 01: Individual Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 01)
Channel 02: Individual Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 02)
Channel 03: D-channel (Default) (Slaves: 03)
 
3 channels configured.
 
ZT_SPANCONFIG failed on span 1: Invalid argument (22)

8x--

when I try to start * it bails out with:


  == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Found
 Apr 19 17:27:34 WARNING[16384]: chan_zap.c:671 zt_open: Unable to specify channel 1: 
 No such device or address
 Apr 19 17:27:34 ERROR[16384]: chan_zap.c:5338 mkintf: Unable to open channel 1: No 
 such device or address
 here = 0, tmp-channel = 1, channel = 1
 Apr 19 17:27:34 ERROR[16384]: chan_zap.c:7490 setup_zap: Unable to register channel 
 '1'
 Apr 19 17:27:34 WARNING[16384]: loader.c:313 ast_load_resource: chan_zap.so: 
 load_module failed, returning -1
   == Unregistered channel type 'Tor'
   == Unregistered channel type 'Zap'
 -- Unregistered channel 1
 Apr 19 17:27:34 WARNING[16384]: loader.c:408 load_modules: Loading module 
 chan_zap.so failed!
 Junk at the beginning 49443303
 



Can anyone out there using zaphfc, help me on this?

Thanks in advance,


--- Paulo Loureiro.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Question about prepaid db

2004-04-19 Thread Julio



Hello,

Somebody has an example with all data loaded in the 
base for prepaid?
or an example of a base that this 
working?...

Thanks...


Julio





[Asterisk-Users] SIP call between 2 *

2004-04-19 Thread Tx. T
Hello,

  I'm new to the list and new to Asterisk.  I'd like to know if any one
has experience or configure files that can help me setup 2 * using SIP
instead of IAX.  I'm able to configure the * using IAX now and like to
try SIP instead.

  Thanks!

---
Tx Tim.




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25¢
http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] (no subject)

2004-04-19 Thread Bobby Whitley
Does anyone now an Asterisk consultant in Atlanta?

Bobby 
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] (no subject)

2004-04-19 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 14:22, Bobby Whitley wrote:
 Does anyone now an Asterisk consultant in Atlanta?

Start Here,
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+consultants+USA
-- 
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] (no subject)

2004-04-19 Thread Paul Crick
 Does anyone now an Asterisk consultant in Atlanta?

1. Use the subject line - it's there for a reason. (no subject) won't draw
too many people to read your message.

2. The wiki is your friend. See the URL below. There's no one listed for
Atlanta, maybe that's why you're asking.. but see point 1 above ;-)

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+consultants+USA

Cheers
Paul

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Question about prepaid db

2004-04-19 Thread Julio



Somebody made run prepaid?...

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Julio 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 2:38 
PM
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Question about 
  prepaid db
  
  Hello,
  
  Somebody has an example with all data loaded in 
  the base for prepaid?
  or an example of a base that this 
  working?...
  
  Thanks...
  
  
  Julio
  
  
  


[Asterisk-Users] One, två, tre, quatre, cinq ... International numbers in say.c

2004-04-19 Thread Olle E. Johansson
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001429

* Support for other language syntaxes in saynumber

Accidentally I opened this can of worms to see if we can add support
for other language syntaxes for saying numbers. Seems like Swedish,
english and norwegian follow the same syntax. I've integrated
existing patches for french, danish and soon portuguese syntax.
The steps we're taking are:

* First a quick-fix only for saying numbers
* Adding documentation and sample sound files
  Many patches require additional sound files compared with the
  english set.
* For a coming release we need a more general architecture that
  includes more phrases, time and date. This will be done with
  loadable modules for various languages.
I need the original contributors of danish, french and portuguese
to fax a disclaimer to Digium. See http://bugs.digium.com
Also, I need users in these language territories to test the
patch and add feedback to the bugtracker. I can try to put all this
together into one unified patch, but not test everything for every
language.
If you have a patch for another syntax, please add it quickly to
the bugtracker and fax in the disclaimer, so we can use it.
If you have sound files for a language with decent quality that
you can share to the community, please do so by adding them to
the bug tracker.
* If we all work on this together quickly, we may have a
working say.c in the CVS soon. But to even ask a committer for
support, I need test results up there on the bug tracker. *
Thank you for your support!

/Olle

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Playback problems with T100P

2004-04-19 Thread Eric Einhorn
Hi,

I'm seeing a problem when calling into my Asterisk server from a T100P
with PRI signalling.  I'm hoping someone has seen this as well, however,
it's a little hard to explain.

When I'm navigating through Asterisk on an inbound call from the PSTN,
I'm getting a random 'noise' during the playback of sound files.  The
best way I can describe this noise, is imagining a windows machine
crashing while it's playing back PCM.  The sound card holds onto the
last few milliseconds of data in it's buffer and plays it in a loop,
creating a (rather painful to the ears) tone.  Another analogy is the
age old pulling out an Atari cartridge sound.

The noise lasts for 2 or 3 seconds ceases.  The sound playback continues
afterwards and was never interrupted, or stopped, for the duration of
this noise.  As stated above, this happens at random.

I've tested the line myself with a berd and I have no errors or slips. 
I've ruled that part out.

I'm not sure if the problem is related to the T100P itself, or if it's
caused by the PC hardware, OS, or Asterisk.  I'd like to rule as much
out as I can before calling Digium about the hardware.

Any help is appreciated.

Thank you.


- Eric
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] One, två, tre, quatre, cinq ... International numbers in say.c

2004-04-19 Thread Brancaleoni Matteo
hi Olle.

I have a patch for italian.

should it be for plain say.c or for your modified say.c ?

Also I have some the .it audio files, I'll ask
if I can distribute them 
(perhaps with some credit to the company I work for, that
payed them...)

Matteo

Il lun, 2004-04-19 alle 21:53, Olle E. Johansson ha scritto:
 http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001429
 
 * Support for other language syntaxes in saynumber
 
 Accidentally I opened this can of worms to see if we can add support
 for other language syntaxes for saying numbers. Seems like Swedish,
 english and norwegian follow the same syntax. I've integrated
 existing patches for french, danish and soon portuguese syntax.
 
 The steps we're taking are:
 
 * First a quick-fix only for saying numbers
 * Adding documentation and sample sound files
Many patches require additional sound files compared with the
english set.
 * For a coming release we need a more general architecture that
includes more phrases, time and date. This will be done with
loadable modules for various languages.
 
 I need the original contributors of danish, french and portuguese
 to fax a disclaimer to Digium. See http://bugs.digium.com
 
 Also, I need users in these language territories to test the
 patch and add feedback to the bugtracker. I can try to put all this
 together into one unified patch, but not test everything for every
 language.
 
 
 If you have a patch for another syntax, please add it quickly to
 the bugtracker and fax in the disclaimer, so we can use it.
 
 If you have sound files for a language with decent quality that
 you can share to the community, please do so by adding them to
 the bug tracker.
 
 * If we all work on this together quickly, we may have a
 working say.c in the CVS soon. But to even ask a committer for
 support, I need test results up there on the bug tracker. *
 
 Thank you for your support!
 
 /Olle
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Brancaleoni Matteo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Espia - Emmegi Srl

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] One, två, tre, quatre, cinq ... International numbers in say.c

2004-04-19 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Brancaleoni Matteo wrote:

hi Olle.

I have a patch for italian.
Great.
should it be for plain say.c or for your modified say.c ?
If you have one that builds on my patch, that'll make life easier
for me. THank you!
Also I have some the .it audio files, I'll ask
if I can distribute them 
(perhaps with some credit to the company I work for, that
payed them...)
Of course.

Anyone else? This seems so focused on Western Europe?

/O
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Playback problems with T100P

2004-04-19 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 14:59, Eric Einhorn wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm seeing a problem when calling into my Asterisk server from a T100P
 with PRI signalling.  I'm hoping someone has seen this as well, however,
 it's a little hard to explain.
 
 When I'm navigating through Asterisk on an inbound call from the PSTN,
 I'm getting a random 'noise' during the playback of sound files.  The
 best way I can describe this noise, is imagining a windows machine
 crashing while it's playing back PCM.  The sound card holds onto the
 last few milliseconds of data in it's buffer and plays it in a loop,
 creating a (rather painful to the ears) tone.  Another analogy is the
 age old pulling out an Atari cartridge sound.
 
 The noise lasts for 2 or 3 seconds ceases.  The sound playback continues
 afterwards and was never interrupted, or stopped, for the duration of
 this noise.  As stated above, this happens at random.
 
 I've tested the line myself with a berd and I have no errors or slips. 
 I've ruled that part out.
 
 I'm not sure if the problem is related to the T100P itself, or if it's
 caused by the PC hardware, OS, or Asterisk.  I'd like to rule as much
 out as I can before calling Digium about the hardware.
 
 Any help is appreciated.

You've done a great job describing your problem with the exception of
documenting all the hardware in the system and software versions. As a
way of eliminating some of the questionable parts, you must enumerate
that part of your setup. Also, where is your T100P pointing to, telco,
pbx, or some other hardware?
-- 
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] zaphfc

2004-04-19 Thread Arnaud Pignard
Hello,

Can you post zapata.conf  and zaptel.conf ?
It's seems a config file problem.
At 19:32 19/04/2004, you wrote:
Hello list,

I'm trying to use zaphfc, the module loads ok, and it identifies the hfc
boards in the machine.
The problem is: whenever i try to ztcfg -vv I get the following:
8x---
Zaptel Configuration
==
SPAN 1: CCS/ AMI Build-out: 399-533 feet (DSX-1)

Channel map:

Channel 01: Individual Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 01)
Channel 02: Individual Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 02)
Channel 03: D-channel (Default) (Slaves: 03)
3 channels configured.

ZT_SPANCONFIG failed on span 1: Invalid argument (22)

8x--

when I try to start * it bails out with:

  == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/zapata.conf': Found
 Apr 19 17:27:34 WARNING[16384]: chan_zap.c:671 zt_open: Unable to 
specify channel 1: No such device or address
 Apr 19 17:27:34 ERROR[16384]: chan_zap.c:5338 mkintf: Unable to open 
channel 1: No such device or address
 here = 0, tmp-channel = 1, channel = 1
 Apr 19 17:27:34 ERROR[16384]: chan_zap.c:7490 setup_zap: Unable to 
register channel '1'
 Apr 19 17:27:34 WARNING[16384]: loader.c:313 ast_load_resource: 
chan_zap.so: load_module failed, returning -1
   == Unregistered channel type 'Tor'
   == Unregistered channel type 'Zap'
 -- Unregistered channel 1
 Apr 19 17:27:34 WARNING[16384]: loader.c:408 load_modules: Loading 
module chan_zap.so failed!
 Junk at the beginning 49443303




Can anyone out there using zaphfc, help me on this?

Thanks in advance,

--- Paulo Loureiro.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] capi_request: didn't find capi device with outgoing msn =

2004-04-19 Thread Rob
Hi,

I can't make outgoing calls  with CAPI (passive ISDN Fritz card). See 
Asterisk error below.
Incoming calls and SIP to SIP calls do work. It looks like a msn 
mismatch in extensions.conf
and capi.conf, but I can't find it.

Can anyone help me find the problem?

Thanks,
Rob
*CLI
   -- Executing Dial(SIP/8112-1be9, CAPI/35666:BYEXTENSION) in 
new stack
Apr 19 13:00:11 NOTICE[671760]: chan_capi.c:1147 capi_request: didn't 
find capi device with outgoing msn = 35666. you should check your 
config!
Apr 19 13:00:11 NOTICE[671760]: app_dial.c:554 dial_exec: Unable to 
create channel of type 'CAPI'
 == Everyone is busy at this time
   -- Executing Congestion(SIP/8112-1be9, ) in new stack
 == Spawn extension (home, 035999, 2) exited non-zero on 
'SIP/8112-1be9'
*CLI
*CLIcapi info
Contr1: 2 B channels total, 2 B channels free.
*CLI

capi.conf:
  msn=35666
modem.conf:
  msn=35666
extensions.conf:
  exten = _0.,1,Dial,${TRUNK}/35666:BYEXTENSION
  exten = _0.,2,Congestion


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] IAX config documentation

2004-04-19 Thread Brian Cuthie
Is there any documentation on configuring IAX between * machines?  I've 
noticed references to many topics in the config files, including:

- dialplans
- trunking
- authentication
- transfers
But before I go and try to grok 8000 lines of source (in one file, no 
less) I was hoping that somewhere there exists even something like a man 
page that describes the configuration options.

There's the beginnings of a whitepaper on wiki, but it's 
self-contradictory in some places, largely incomplete, and just kind of 
ends abruptly. Yet, it mentions that growing contingent of IAX devices. Huh.

Thanks

-brian
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] capi_request: didn't find capi device with outgoing msn =

2004-04-19 Thread Peer Oliver schmidt
Rob wrote:
I can't make outgoing calls  with CAPI (passive ISDN Fritz card). See 
Asterisk error below.
Incoming calls and SIP to SIP calls do work. It looks like a msn 
mismatch in extensions.conf
and capi.conf, but I can't find it.
I had the same problem. A reboot of the system solved it.

hth
rgds
pos
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX config documentation

2004-04-19 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 16:08, Brian Cuthie wrote:
 Is there any documentation on configuring IAX between * machines?  I've 
 noticed references to many topics in the config files, including:
 
 - dialplans

This is extensions.conf work. Some of it can be shared via the switch
command.

 - trunking

Trunking is easy, think of it kind of like a channelized t1. It combines
many calls into one packet with call data so as to reduce the overhead
of each individual call having it's own resources. Specifically it cuts
down on the overhead in IP, and allows you to reclaim some of the
bandwidth for more calls.

 - authentication

You do want to know who is trying to call you don't you?

 - transfers

Allows you to get out of the middle of a call. My office loves these as
our trunk lines are remote, and when we forward a call out to another
trunk line, our local asterisk machine transfers the call back to the
machine with trunk lines and removes the VoIP part of the loop.

 But before I go and try to grok 8000 lines of source (in one file, no 
 less) I was hoping that somewhere there exists even something like a man 
 page that describes the configuration options.

There is plenty of banter on the list and info scattered about that
google will find for you than reading the source. Of course, you are
free to bludgen yourself with the code if you so wish. 

 There's the beginnings of a whitepaper on wiki, but it's 
 self-contradictory in some places, largely incomplete, and just kind of 
 ends abruptly. Yet, it mentions that growing contingent of IAX devices. Huh.

Jump in and help finish it when you have read some and start to
understand the missing parts.
-- 
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] asterisk

2004-04-19 Thread Chris Wik
Dear List,

I've compiled asterisk (both 0.9.0 and the CVS-04/19/04 source 
trees). I'm using the oh323 channel driver version 0.5.10, OpenH323 
v1.12.2, PWlib v1.5.2

When run on a RedHat 9 system, I am constantly getting seg faults. 
This happens even when I tried removing the oh323 channel driver, so 
it appears to be something with asterisk. I get crashes either when 
attempting to start asterisk or when asterisk receives an incoming 
h323 call.

When run on a RedHat 7.3 system (exact same source code) both 
asterisk and the oh323 channel driver appear to be stable.

Does anyone have any advice? I assume this has something to do with 
incompatible libraries, but have no idea where to start.

TIA
Chris
--
Chris Wik
Systems Admin
ANU Internet Services
http://www.anu.net/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on Mac OS X 10.3

2004-04-19 Thread Stephen Macartney
Hi,

Has anybody successfully compiled Asterisk on Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther)?  
If so, I would be grateful for instructions on how to achieve a 
successful installation.  I am running on an Apple G4 dual processor.

Thanks,

Steve Macartney

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Load module chan_zap.so failed

2004-04-19 Thread jorge verastegui
Hi 
I' ve just installed TE410P and  asterisk-0.7.2 from tar.gz on fedora
core 1. 
When i start asterisk it shows me this:

 /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_zap.so: undefined symbol:
ast_pickup_call
Apr 19 16:52:32 WARNING[-1085304704]: loader.c:358 load_modules: Loading
module chan_zap.so failed!


Where do i look, how can i debug?

Thanks in advance

Jorge Verastegui G
RedCetus S.R.L


--NOTA DE REDCETUS S.R.L. :  La informacin contenida en este E-mail y sus anexos, slo puede ser utilizada por el individuo o la compaia a la cual est dirigido. Si no es el receptor autorizado, cualquier retencin, difusin, distribucin o copia de este mensaje es prohibida y sancionada por la ley. Si por error recibe este mensaje, favor reenviarlo y borrar el mismo

[Asterisk-Users] queue out

2004-04-19 Thread Jose Maria Guisasola
Please:

There is some form so that a user in the queue leaves her (with a digit) and 
the system execute another command (for example goto a voice mailbox).

My version: Asterisk CVS-04/16/04



Thanks in advance


-- 
Jose Mª Guisasola
Consultor Técnico
CMSI 2002 S.L.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] spandsp/rxfax terminates asterisk

2004-04-19 Thread Martin Christian Koch








Initial handshake sounds fine, but asterisks dies
before receive of the fax. Here is the log :



Changed from phase 0 to 1

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Start receiving document

Changed from phase 1 to 4

Sending ident

 CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

DIS:

Preferred octets: 256

Can receive fax

Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29

R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK

2D coding OK

Scan line length: 215mm

Recording length: A4 (297mm)

Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm:
T7.7 = T3.85

R8x15.4lines/mm OK

Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4
= T7.7

 DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 80 01

HDLC underflow in state 9

Changed from phase 4 to 3

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

Slow carrier up

Slow carrier down

T4 timeout in state 9

Changed from phase 3 to 4

Sending ident

 CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

DIS:

Preferred octets: 256

Can receive fax

Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29

R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK

2D coding OK

Scan line length: 215mm

Recording length: A4 (297mm)

Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm:
T7.7 = T3.85

R8x15.4lines/mm OK

Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4
= T7.7

 DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 80 01

T2 timeout

Start receiving document

Sending ident

 CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

DIS:

Preferred octets: 256

Can receive fax

Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29

R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK

2D coding OK

Scan line length: 215mm

Recording length: A4 (297mm)

Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm:
T7.7 = T3.85

R8x15.4lines/mm OK

Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4
= T7.7

 DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 80 01

HDLC underflow in state 9

Changed from phase 4 to 3

Slow carrier up

 TSI: 43 30 36 37 37 36 31 36 35 20 35 34
2b 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

TSI without final frame tag

Remote fax gave TSI as: +45 56167760

 DCS: 83 00 46 20

DCS with final frame tag

In state 9

DCS:

Can receive fax

Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps

R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK

Scan line length: 215mm

Recording length: A4 (297mm)

Minimum scan line time: 10ms

Get at 9600

Changed from phase 3 to 5

Fast carrier up

Fast carrier down

Fast carrier up

Coarse carrier frequency 1700.00 (64)

Training error 29.095569

Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 25.504344)

Fast carrier trained

Fast carrier down

Changed from phase 5 to 4

Start rx document - compression 1

Start rx page

asterisk in realloc(): warning: junk pointer, too
high to make sense

Oh dear!

 CFR: 84

HDLC underflow in state 5

Post trainability

Changed from phase 4 to 5

Fast carrier up

Coarse carrier frequency 1700.04 (64)

Training error 26.487284

Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 27.123313)

Fast carrier trained

Segmentation fault (core dumped)



Anyone ?



Thanks,

Martin



Min mail er beskyttet af SPAMfighter 3174 spam mails er blokeret indtil videre.Hent gratis SPAMfighter i dag!





Re: [Asterisk-Users] Load module chan_zap.so failed

2004-04-19 Thread Todd Lieberman
you must
ztcfg -vv
then modprobe your zaptel harware...
jorge verastegui wrote:

Hi 
I' ve just installed TE410P and  asterisk-0.7.2 from tar.gz on fedora
core 1. 
When i start asterisk it shows me this:

/usr/lib/asterisk/modules/chan_zap.so: undefined symbol:
ast_pickup_call
Apr 19 16:52:32 WARNING[-1085304704]: loader.c:358 load_modules: Loading
module chan_zap.so failed!
Where do i look, how can i debug?

Thanks in advance

Jorge Verastegui G
RedCetus S.R.L
 



--
*NOTA DE REDCETUS S.R.L.* : La información contenida en este E-mail y 
sus anexos, sólo puede ser utilizada por el individuo o la compañia a 
la cual está dirigido. Si no es el receptor autorizado, cualquier 
retención, difusión, distribución o copia de este mensaje es prohibida 
y sancionada por la ley. Si por error recibe este mensaje, favor 
reenviarlo y borrar el mismo


--
Todd Lieberman
http://tlsolutions.net
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p. 215.495.0030
f. 215.495.0031
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] ixj module

2004-04-19 Thread Jose Maria Guisasola
Hello list:

If I am not mistaken the module 'ixj' is for the cards 'Quicknet LineJack' is 
possible not to load it when starting asterisk ?.

How call asterisk this module ?.

-- 
Jose Mª Guisasola
Consultor Técnico
CMSI 2002 S.L.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Zap Outgoing

2004-04-19 Thread neo
Hello All,

i m having busy signal when i dial any number, while incoming on zap is working 
fine and its transfering to my soft phone.

some time back outgoing was working ok but now i dont know what i messed up.

any idea ?

it gives busy signal after Zap/25-1 answered SIP/300


-Neo

= Spawn extension (voicepulse-incoming, s, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/25-1'
-- Hungup 'Zap/25-1'
-- Executing Dial(SIP/3000-2e72, Zap/25/18005558355) in new stack
-- Called 25/18005558355
-- Zap/25-1 answered SIP/3000-2e72

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk prepaid debug

2004-04-19 Thread Julio



My Asterisk prepaid debug is:


- Hungup 'Zap/2-1'Urgent 
handler -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1'Urgent 
handler -- Playing 'prepaid-enter-card-num' (language 
'en')Urgent handler -- Playing 'prepaid-you-have' 
(language 'en')Urgent handler -- Playing 'digits/4' 
(language 'en')Urgent handler -- Playing 
'digits/hundred' (language 'en')Urgent handler -- 
Playing 'prepaid-dollars' (language 'en')Urgent 
handler -- Playing 'prepaid-enter-dest' (language 
'en')Urgent handler -- Playing 'prepaid-dest-blocked' 
(language 'en')Urgent handler -- Playing 
'prepaid-dest-unreachable' (language 'en')


Why 'prepaid-dest-unreachable' ?? 


Thks.

Regards






  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Martin Christian Koch 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 4:05 
PM
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp/rxfax 
  terminates asterisk
  
  
  Initial handshake sounds fine, but 
  asterisks dies before receive of the fax. Here is the log :
  
  Changed from phase 0 to 
  1
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Start receiving 
  document
  Changed from phase 1 to 
  4
  Sending ident
   CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 
  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
  DIS:
  Preferred octets: 
  256
  Can receive fax
  Supported data signalling rates: 
  V.27ter and V.29
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 
  200x200pels/25.4mm OK
  2D coding OK
  Scan line length: 
  215mm
  Recording length: A4 
  (297mm)
  Receiver's minimum scan line time: 
  0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
  R8x15.4lines/mm 
  OK
  Minimum scan line time for higher 
  resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
   DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 
  80 01
  HDLC underflow in state 
  9
  Changed from phase 4 to 
  3
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier 
down
  T4 timeout in state 
  9
  Changed from phase 3 to 
  4
  Sending ident
   CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 
  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
  DIS:
  Preferred octets: 
  256
  Can receive fax
  Supported data signalling rates: 
  V.27ter and V.29
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 
  200x200pels/25.4mm OK
  2D coding OK
  Scan line length: 
  215mm
  Recording length: A4 
  (297mm)
  Receiver's minimum scan line time: 
  0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
  R8x15.4lines/mm 
  OK
  Minimum scan line time for higher 
  resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
   DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 
  80 01
  T2 timeout
  Start receiving 
  document
  Sending ident
   CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 
  20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
  DIS:
  Preferred octets: 
  256
  Can receive fax
  Supported data signalling rates: 
  V.27ter and V.29
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 
  200x200pels/25.4mm OK
  2D coding OK
  Scan line length: 
  215mm
  Recording length: A4 
  (297mm)
  Receiver's minimum scan line time: 
  0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
  R8x15.4lines/mm 
  OK
  Minimum scan line time for higher 
  resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
   DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 
  80 01
  HDLC underflow in state 
  9
  Changed from phase 4 to 
  3
  Slow carrier up
   TSI: 43 30 36 37 37 
  36 31 36 35 20 35 34 2b 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
  TSI without final frame 
  tag
  Remote fax gave TSI as: "+45 
  56167760"
   DCS: 83 00 46 
  20
  DCS with final frame 
  tag
  In state 9
  DCS:
  Can receive fax
  Selected data signalling rate: 
  V.29, 9600bps
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 
  200x200pels/25.4mm OK
  Scan line length: 
  215mm
  Recording length: A4 
  (297mm)
  Minimum scan line time: 
  10ms
  Get at 9600
  Changed from phase 3 to 
  5
  Fast carrier up
  Fast carrier 
down
  Fast carrier up
  Coarse carrier frequency 1700.00 
  (64)
  Training error 
  29.095569
  Training succeeded (constellation 
  mismatch 25.504344)
  Fast carrier 
  trained
  Fast carrier 
down
  Changed from phase 5 to 
  4
  Start rx document - compression 
  1
  Start rx page
  asterisk in realloc(): warning: 
  junk pointer, too high to make sense
  Oh dear!
   CFR: 
  84
  HDLC underflow in 

[Asterisk-Users] Random Disconnects

2004-04-19 Thread Matt Riddell



I am getting random disconnects about 5-10 times 
a day. The logs show nothing except that the call was hung up. The 
calls are from X100P-*-digium T1 card-carrier access channel bank 
II-analogue phone. It is happening to all users. Is it possible 
that this is coming from busydetect=yes? 

Does busydetect detect cadences etc for the 
hangup frequencies? I have busycount=3...

Any ideas? Any more information I could 
provide?

Kind regards,


Matt Riddell


[Asterisk-Users] -- MARK --

2004-04-19 Thread Michael Welter
Every half hour I get -- MARK -- in the syslog.  Is this normal behavior?

Thanks,
Mike
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] -- MARK --

2004-04-19 Thread Paul Crick
 Every half hour I get -- MARK -- in the syslog.
 Is this normal behavior?

Yup - I get it too, although I seem to remember it was more of a Slackware
thing than a RedHat thing..

I think it's configurable too, so you can turn it off if it's pissing you
off.

Cheers
Paul

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] -- MARK --

2004-04-19 Thread Hermann Wecke
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Michael Welter wrote:
 Every half hour I get -- MARK -- in the syslog.  Is this normal behavior?

This has nothing to be with asterisk, but with your linux installation.
Yes, it is a normal behavior and it is harmless... It is just a half hour
stamp to your syslog...
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] -- MARK --

2004-04-19 Thread Mark Musone
From syslogd man page:

   -m interval
  The syslogd logs a mark timestamp regularly.  The default
inter-val  between  two  --  MARK -- lines is 20 minutes.  This can be
changed with this option.  Setting the interval to zero turns it off
entirely.



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hermann
Wecke
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 7:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] -- MARK --

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Michael Welter wrote:
 Every half hour I get -- MARK -- in the syslog.  Is this normal
behavior?

This has nothing to be with asterisk, but with your linux installation.
Yes, it is a normal behavior and it is harmless... It is just a half
hour
stamp to your syslog...
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Random Disconnects

2004-04-19 Thread Nicolas Gudino
Hi Matt,

Increase your busycount to 6 or 7. I had that problem also with an
X100P, and it went away increasing the busycount parameter.

On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 20:28, Matt Riddell wrote:
 I am getting random disconnects about 5-10 times a day.  The logs show
 nothing except that the call was hung up.  The calls are from
 X100P-*-digium T1 card-carrier access channel bank II-analogue
 phone.  It is happening to all users.  Is it possible that this is
 coming from busydetect=yes?  
  
 Does busydetect detect cadences etc for the hangup frequencies?  I
 have busycount=3...
  
 Any ideas?  Any more information I could provide?
  
 Kind regards,
  
  
 Matt Riddell
-- 
Nicolas Gudino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
House Internet S.R.L.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] -- MARK --

2004-04-19 Thread Isamar Maia

 On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Michael Welter wrote:
  Every half hour I get -- MARK -- in the syslog.  Is this normal behavior?

 This has nothing to be with asterisk, but with your linux installation.
 Yes, it is a normal behavior and it is harmless... It is just a half hour
 stamp to your syslog...

I think it was because of MARK Spencer... burn him!  :-)

Isamar




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Asterisk-Users] One, två, tre, quatre, cinq ... International numbers in say.c

2004-04-19 Thread Matt Riddell
I have the sounds for French, but can record more if necessary.  They are
available at www.sineapps.com

Is a disclaimer required on these?

Kind regards,

Matt Riddell
- Original Message - 
From: Olle E. Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Users Asterisk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 7:53 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] One, två, tre, quatre, cinq ... International
numbers in say.c


| http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001429
|
| * Support for other language syntaxes in saynumber
|
| Accidentally I opened this can of worms to see if we can add support
| for other language syntaxes for saying numbers. Seems like Swedish,
| english and norwegian follow the same syntax. I've integrated
| existing patches for french, danish and soon portuguese syntax.
|
| The steps we're taking are:
|
| * First a quick-fix only for saying numbers
| * Adding documentation and sample sound files
|Many patches require additional sound files compared with the
|english set.
| * For a coming release we need a more general architecture that
|includes more phrases, time and date. This will be done with
|loadable modules for various languages.
|
| I need the original contributors of danish, french and portuguese
| to fax a disclaimer to Digium. See http://bugs.digium.com
|
| Also, I need users in these language territories to test the
| patch and add feedback to the bugtracker. I can try to put all this
| together into one unified patch, but not test everything for every
| language.
|
|
| If you have a patch for another syntax, please add it quickly to
| the bugtracker and fax in the disclaimer, so we can use it.
|
| If you have sound files for a language with decent quality that
| you can share to the community, please do so by adding them to
| the bug tracker.
|
| * If we all work on this together quickly, we may have a
| working say.c in the CVS soon. But to even ask a committer for
| support, I need test results up there on the bug tracker. *
|
| Thank you for your support!
|
| /Olle
|
|
| ___
| Asterisk-Users mailing list
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
| To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Random Disconnects

2004-04-19 Thread Matt Riddell
- Original Message - 
| Hi Matt,
|
| Increase your busycount to 6 or 7. I had that problem also with an
| X100P, and it went away increasing the busycount parameter.

Now that I check it, I don't have a busycount...does this really need to be
set in dsp.c?

If so how would I compile it and install it with the machine running?

Cheers,

Matt

| On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 20:28, Matt Riddell wrote:
|  I am getting random disconnects about 5-10 times a day.  The logs show
|  nothing except that the call was hung up.  The calls are from
|  X100P-*-digium T1 card-carrier access channel bank II-analogue
|  phone.  It is happening to all users.  Is it possible that this is
|  coming from busydetect=yes?
| 
|  Does busydetect detect cadences etc for the hangup frequencies?  I
|  have busycount=3...
| 
|  Any ideas?  Any more information I could provide?
| 
|  Kind regards,
| 
| 
|  Matt Riddell
| -- 
| Nicolas Gudino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| House Internet S.R.L.
|
| ___
| Asterisk-Users mailing list
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
| To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Random Disconnects

2004-04-19 Thread Matt Riddell
| - Original Message - 
| | Hi Matt,
| |
| | Increase your busycount to 6 or 7. I had that problem also with an
| | X100P, and it went away increasing the busycount parameter.
|
| Now that I check it, I don't have a busycount...does this really need to
be
| set in dsp.c?
|
| If so how would I compile it and install it with the machine running?
|
According to http://www.automated.it/guidetoasterisk.htm it goes in the
zapata.conf file after busydetect=yes.

Soz for mail list spam...

Kind regards,

Matt Riddell

| | On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 20:28, Matt Riddell wrote:
| |  I am getting random disconnects about 5-10 times a day.  The logs show
| |  nothing except that the call was hung up.  The calls are from
| |  X100P-*-digium T1 card-carrier access channel bank II-analogue
| |  phone.  It is happening to all users.  Is it possible that this is
| |  coming from busydetect=yes?
| | 
| |  Does busydetect detect cadences etc for the hangup frequencies?  I
| |  have busycount=3...
| | 
| |  Any ideas?  Any more information I could provide?
| | 
| |  Kind regards,
| | 
| | 
| |  Matt Riddell
| | -- 
| | Nicolas Gudino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | House Internet S.R.L.
| |
| | ___
| | Asterisk-Users mailing list
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
| | To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
| |http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
|
| ___
| Asterisk-Users mailing list
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
| To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
|http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP SIP SoftPhone Recommendations

2004-04-19 Thread JORA ROME
Can you give me the configuration archives, I have a problems witch clients 
on *.

Thanx.

JRR


From: Edmund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP SIP  SoftPhone Recommendations
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:50:17 +0800
I'm using Linphone. It works pefectly with *.

Edmund

JORA ROME wrote:

What SoftPhone working very well with *? S.O. is Debian Linux
Thanks for your comments.
JRR

_
MSN Amor: busca tu ½ naranja http://latam.msn.com/amor/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
_
MSN Amor: busca tu ½ naranja http://latam.msn.com/amor/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Coredump while txfax - case2

2004-04-19 Thread Alex Zarubin
Title: Coredump while txfax - case2





Hi Steve and all,


This is the 2nd attachment.


In many cases txfax works on our asterisk with RH9, spandsp.0.0.1k and libtiff.so.3.5.
The attached tif file and another one (case 2, attached to the next message)
crash * consistently in libtiff. Both files had been received by rxfax.


...
Changed from phase 3 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 4
Start tx page
Page 3 of /usr/tmp/susp2.tif
128 rows/1866 bytes to send
 MPS: 4f
HDLC underflow in state 13
Changed from phase 4 to 3
Slow carrier up
 MCF: 8c
MCF with final frame tag
In state 13
Changed from phase 3 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 4
Start tx page


#0 0x4084398c in TIFFWriteBufferSetup () from /usr/local/lib/libtiff.so.3
(gdb) bt
#0 0x4084398c in TIFFWriteBufferSetup () from /usr/local/lib/libtiff.so.3
#1 0x40843b08 in TIFFFlushData1 () from /usr/local/lib/libtiff.so.3
#2 0x4082fab4 in _TIFFFax3fillruns () from /usr/local/lib/libtiff.so.3
#3 0x408303e8 in _TIFFFax3fillruns () from /usr/local/lib/libtiff.so.3
#4 0x40830589 in _TIFFFax3fillruns () from /usr/local/lib/libtiff.so.3
#5 0x4080e666 in t4_tx_start_page () from /usr/local/lib/libspandsp.so.0
#6 0x4080eb06 in fast_getbit () from /usr/local/lib/libspandsp.so.0
#7 0x40819617 in getbaud () from /usr/local/lib/libspandsp.so.0
#8 0x408198ad in v29_tx () from /usr/local/lib/libspandsp.so.0
#9 0x4081289f in fax_tx_process () from /usr/local/lib/libspandsp.so.0
#10 0x4086539a in txfax_exec (chan=0x81b2ed8, data="" at app_txfax.c:216
#11 0x0806377a in pbx_exec (c=0x81b2ed8, app=0x81aa9f0, data="" newstack=1) at pbx.c:396
#12 0x0806ac81 in pbx_extension_helper (c=0x81b2ed8, context=0x81b3030 webley_txfax, 
 exten=0xbc7ff65c /usr/tmp/susp2.tif|caller, priority=2, callerid=0x0, action="" at pbx.c:1157
#13 0x0806568c in ast_pbx_run (c=0x81b2ed8) at pbx.c:1641
#14 0x080681b0 in ast_pbx_outgoing_exten (type=0x81b1cc8 Zap, format=64, data="" timeout=12, 
 context=0x81b21c8 webley_txfax, exten=0x81b20c8 txfax_ext, priority=1, reason=0xbc7ff65c, sync=135999192, 
 callerid=0x81b2ed8 Zap/1-1, variable=0x81b23cc TXFAX_NAME, account=0x81b2dcc ) at pbx.c:3838
#15 0x406de2ab in attempt_thread (data="" at pbx_spool.c:196
#16 0x4003fae0 in pthread_start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
(gdb)


Would be great to fix this one...


Thank you.


Alex Zarubin
Webley Systems







susp2.tif.gz
Description: Binary data


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Accommodating multiple FWD users

2004-04-19 Thread Malcolm Taylor
Thanks to Philipp, Eric and Vic for their responses.  In the end, I decided
to use Philipp's approach and it works like a charm!

Malcolm

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philipp von
Klitzing
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Accommodating multiple FWD users

Hi!

  Can anyone suggest a way in which all users could dial the prefix 8 and
*
  would automatically associate the correct FWD account for the outbound
call?
 
 Try using GoToIf [show application gotoif] in combination with
 ${CALLERIDNUM} [asterisk/doc/README.variables]

I prefer a slightly cleaner method:

1. create a type=peer entry for each outgoing FWD account in sip.conf. 
For example you have [fwd-out_joe], [fwd-out_bob], [fwd-out_mary] where 
you specify the individual username, fromuser and password

2. in sip.conf put each of your local phone users into their own context 
like context=from-joe or context=from-mary

3. in extension.conf you do smth like include = default for each of 
those person contexts like [from-joe], and arrange a FWD dialout like
_8X. = Dial(SIP/{EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

If, however, you want to avoid individual contexts in extensions.conf you 
could instead us DBput() and DBget() lookup the correct fwd-out_xxx 
string based upon your local users's callerid.

Cheers, Philipp


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX config documentation

2004-04-19 Thread Brian Cuthie
I know that this stuff is. What I'm looking for is an overview of how 
these features work in the context of IAX. For instance, trunking is a 
concept I think we all get. But how do you use IAX to establish trunking 
between two switches?  What's the effect of turning the transfer 
option on? How are dialplans shared between switches that are connected 
via IAX? What kinds of authentication are supported? How are keys managed?

-brian

Steven Critchfield wrote:

On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 16:08, Brian Cuthie wrote:
 

Is there any documentation on configuring IAX between * machines?  I've 
noticed references to many topics in the config files, including:

- dialplans
   

This is extensions.conf work. Some of it can be shared via the switch
command.
 

- trunking
   

Trunking is easy, think of it kind of like a channelized t1. It combines
many calls into one packet with call data so as to reduce the overhead
of each individual call having it's own resources. Specifically it cuts
down on the overhead in IP, and allows you to reclaim some of the
bandwidth for more calls.
 

- authentication
   

You do want to know who is trying to call you don't you?

 

- transfers
   

Allows you to get out of the middle of a call. My office loves these as
our trunk lines are remote, and when we forward a call out to another
trunk line, our local asterisk machine transfers the call back to the
machine with trunk lines and removes the VoIP part of the loop.
 

But before I go and try to grok 8000 lines of source (in one file, no 
less) I was hoping that somewhere there exists even something like a man 
page that describes the configuration options.
   

There is plenty of banter on the list and info scattered about that
google will find for you than reading the source. Of course, you are
free to bludgen yourself with the code if you so wish. 

 

There's the beginnings of a whitepaper on wiki, but it's 
self-contradictory in some places, largely incomplete, and just kind of 
ends abruptly. Yet, it mentions that growing contingent of IAX devices. Huh.
   

Jump in and help finish it when you have read some and start to
understand the missing parts.
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Need Help with Dial Plan

2004-04-19 Thread AstGrp
Let me lay it out for you

Call comes in over a T1 - Signal is em_w.  The extension is seen as
*callerid*last 4 digits of number being called*.  Which is fine in
it self.

I have my extension.conf file set up as follows...


[did]

; Receive call as *calling*called
exten = _.,1,Answer
exten = _.,2,Cut(CALLING=EXTEN,*,2)
exten = _.,3,SetCIDNum(${CALLING})
exten = _.,4,Cut(CALLED=EXTEN,*,3)
exten = _.,5,Goto(main,${CALLED},1)

include = main

[main]

exten = 0031,1,Answer
exten = 0031,2,Goto(TNE-SG,s,1)

Include = did
include = TNE-SG

[TNE-SG]

exten = s,1,Answer
;exten = s,2,agi,tne.agi
exten = s,2,Background(tne-main-thanks)
exten = s,3,Background(tne-main-menu)
exten = 1,1,Goto(default-tne,9100,1)
exten = 2,1,Goto(default-tne,4100,1)
exten = 3,1,Goto(default-tne,4200,1)
exten = 4,1,Goto(default-tne,4300,1)
exten = 5,1,Goto(default-tne,4400,1)
exten = 6,1,Goto(tne-main-menu,s,3)
exten = 7,1,Hangup

include = default-tne
include = main

[default-tne]

include = TNE-SG

; Geoff Clark
exten = 4001,1,Macro(stdexten,4001,SIP/gclark)
;exten = 4001,1,Dial(IAX/home:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = 4004,1,Macro(stdexten,4004,SIP/home)

; Kyle Elworthy
exten = 4002,1,Macro(stdexten,4002,SIP/kelworth)
exten = 4003,1,Macro(stdexten,4003,SIP/khome)

; Tech Support Agents
exten = *6,1,AgentCallbackLogin(4001,[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = *7,1,AgentCallbackLogin(4002,[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = 401,1,Dial(Zap/g1/7046223905)
exten = 402,1,Dial(Zap/g1/7049071514)

exten = 411,1,Answer
exten = 411,2,Wait,2
exten = 411,3,Background(auth-thankyou)
exten = 411,4,Queue(tech-supp)

Where the problem comes in is - I can dial in fine in this scenerio -
but when I go to make an outbound call, it calls the did context and
cut's the call up.  

My problem appears to be I need it one way but not the other.. I hope
this makes since...

Thanks,

-gcc
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk prepaid debug

2004-04-19 Thread Carlos Arnt
What kind of prepaid agi did you use ?Could you send me the page ? How install or where find ?
Thanks alot.
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 20:07:14 -0600, Julio wrote: My Asterisk prepaid debug is: - Hungup 'Zap/2-1' Urgent handler  -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1' Urgent handler  -- Playing 'prepaid-enter-card-num' (language 'en') Urgent handler  -- Playing 'prepaid-you-have' (language 'en') Urgent handler  -- Playing 'digits/4' (language 'en') Urgent handler  -- Playing 'digits/hundred' (language 'en') Urgent handler  -- Playing 'prepaid-dollars' (language 'en') Urgent handler  -- Playing 'prepaid-enter-dest' (language 'en') Urgent handler  -- Playing 'prepaid-dest-blocked' (language 'en') Urgent handler  -- Playing 'prepaid-dest-unreachable' (language 'en') Why 'prepaid-dest-unreachable' ?? Thks. Regards - Original Message - From: Martin Christian Koch To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 4:05 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] spandsp/rxfax terminates asterisk Initial handshake sounds fine, but asterisks dies before receive of the fax. Here is the log :  Changed from phase 0 to 1 Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Start receiving document Changed from phase 1 to 4 Sending ident CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 DIS: Preferred octets: 256 Can receive fax Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 R8x15.4lines/mm OK Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 80 01 HDLC underflow in state 9 Changed from phase 4 to 3 Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up Slow carrier down T4 timeout in state 9 Changed from phase 3 to 4 Sending ident CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 DIS: Preferred octets: 256 Can receive fax Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 R8x15.4lines/mm OK Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 80 01 T2 timeout Start receiving document Sending ident CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 DIS: Preferred octets: 256 Can receive fax Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 R8x15.4lines/mm OK Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 80 01 HDLC underflow in state 9 Changed from phase 4 to 3 Slow carrier up  TSI: 43 30 36 37 37 36 31 36 35 20 35 34 2b 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 TSI without final frame tag Remote fax gave TSI as: "+45 56167760"  DCS: 83 00 46 20 DCS with final frame tag In state 9 DCS: Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 10ms Get at 9600 Changed from phase 3 to 5 Fast carrier up Fast carrier down Fast carrier up Coarse carrier frequency 1700.00 (64) Training error 29.095569 Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 25.504344) Fast carrier trained Fast carrier down Changed from phase 5 to 4 Start rx document - compression 1 Start rx page asterisk in realloc(): warning: junk pointer, too high to make sense Oh dear! CFR: 84 HDLC underflow in state 5 Post trainability Changed from phase 4 to 5 Fast carrier up Coarse carrier frequency 1700.04 (64) Training error 26.487284 Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 27.123313) Fast carrier trained Segmentation fault (core dumped) Anyone ? Thanks, Martin Min mail er beskyttet af SPAMfighter 3174 spam mails er blokeret indtil videre. Hent gratis SPAMfighter i dag!



[Asterisk-Users] Connecting PBX to Asterisk

2004-04-19 Thread Antonio Rabena
Im trying to inter-connect my current PBX system and Asterisk.  Asterisk 
has some users from different networks (internet).. I used cisco router 
using 4 fxs  to pbx and SIP to asterisk.

Is there any way i can allow the ip address of cisco to connect to my 
asterisk using SIP?  IP Address of cisco is 192.168.0.254

here's a part of my sip.conf

[general]
port = 5060
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0
context = default
srvlookup = yes
pedantic = yes
tos=lowdelay
maxexpirey=360
defaultexpirey=120
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
[2101]
type=friend
context=sip-users
secret=
host=dynamic
username=2101
qualify=yes
nat=yes
canreinvite=no


and my extensions.conf

[sip-users]
exten =_21XX,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[default]
exten s,1,Hangup
Regards,

Antonio Rabena 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura line 1 outgoing voice problem?

2004-04-19 Thread Mark Musone
I did some packet sniffs, and below are two sets of packets, the first
is the second phone line that works fine with an incoming call and
outgoing sound This seems to be the key packet that sets up the codes
and sessions
( I really don't know any of this sip stuff well, but hopefully somebody
on the list knows it):


The main thing to point out is the initial Media Description section.
In the Working line2, it's:

Media Description, name and address (m): audio 16446 RTP/AVP 0 101
...
Media Format: 101
Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
Media Attribute Fieldname: rtpmap
Media Attribute Value: 101 telephone-event/8000
Media Attribute (a): fmtp:101 0-15
Media Attribute Fieldname: fmtp
Media Attribute Value: 101 0-15


So I believe this is setting up the audio transmit stuff. On the line1,
this data is NOT being sent. I don't know what this stuff means, still
looking into it..but maybe someone here does know it? Am I possibly even
on the right track??

The other thought I have, since this is data being sent FROM the Sipura
TO asterisk, the problem is once again seeming to point directly at
Sipura, and it's basically not sending the audio info..

Does any of this even make any sense??


Hope this either helps others to possibly find a fix, or if anyone
_does_ have a fix, please let me know!


Packet for line2, working outgoing audio

Frame 7 (733 bytes on wire, 733 bytes captured)
Ethernet II, Src: 00:0e:08:aa:b7:b1, Dst: 00:07:95:55:7b:ce
Internet Protocol, Src Addr: 192.168.1.21 (192.168.1.21), Dst Addr:
192.168.1.20 (192.168.1.20)
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 5061 (5061), Dst Port: 5060 (5060)
Session Initiation Protocol
Status line: SIP/2.0 200 OK
Status-Code: 200
Message Header
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061;tag=6b4e39bb53bc50bc
SIP to address: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061
SIP tag: 6b4e39bb53bc50bc
From: asterisk sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as55a02558
SIP from address: asterisk sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SIP tag: as55a02558
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 INVITE
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.20:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0d8c5d0f
Contact: SPA 2202 sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061
Server: Sipura/SPA2000-2.0.2
Content-Length: 210
Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INFO, INVITE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER
Supported: x-sipura
Content-Type: application/sdp
Message body
Session Description Protocol
Session Description Protocol Version (v): 0
Owner/Creator, Session Id (o): - 25669620 25669620 IN IP4
192.168.1.21
Owner Username: -
Session ID: 25669620
Session Version: 25669620
Owner Network Type: IN
Owner Address Type: IP4
Owner Address: 192.168.1.21
Session Name (s): -
Connection Information (c): IN IP4 192.168.1.21
Connection Network Type: IN
Connection Address Type: IP4
Connection Address: 192.168.1.21
Time Description, active time (t): 0 0
Session Start Time: 0
Session Start Time: 0
Media Description, name and address (m): audio 16446 RTP/AVP
0 101
Media Type: audio
Media Port: 16446
Media Proto: RTP/AVP
Media Format: 0
Media Format: 101
Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
Media Attribute Fieldname: rtpmap
Media Attribute Value: 0 PCMU/8000
Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
Media Attribute Fieldname: rtpmap
Media Attribute Value: 101 telephone-event/8000
Media Attribute (a): fmtp:101 0-15
Media Attribute Fieldname: fmtp
Media Attribute Value: 101 0-15
Media Attribute (a): ptime:20
Media Attribute Fieldname: ptime
Media Attribute Value: 20
Media Attribute (a): sendrecv



Below is an incoming phone call to line1, with the outgoing voice NOT
working:


Frame 7 (672 bytes on wire, 672 bytes captured)
Ethernet II, Src: 00:0e:08:aa:b7:b1, Dst: 00:07:95:55:7b:ce
Internet Protocol, Src Addr: 192.168.1.21 (192.168.1.21), Dst Addr:
192.168.1.20 (192.168.1.20)
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 5060 (5060), Dst Port: 5060 (5060)
Session Initiation Protocol
Status line: SIP/2.0 200 OK
Status-Code: 200
Message Header
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=f03d01bbf25c28bb
SIP to address: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SIP tag: f03d01bbf25c28bb
From: asterisk sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as5c261e75
SIP from address: asterisk sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SIP tag: as5c261e75
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 INVITE
Via: 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] -- MARK --

2004-04-19 Thread Michael Welter
Well that's what I thought.  The syslog had 'asterisk' as the sending 
process, so I assumed it was a debug statement from Mark S.  sigh

Mike

Isamar Maia wrote:

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Michael Welter wrote:

Every half hour I get -- MARK -- in the syslog.  Is this normal behavior?
This has nothing to be with asterisk, but with your linux installation.
Yes, it is a normal behavior and it is harmless... It is just a half hour
stamp to your syslog...


I think it was because of MARK Spencer... burn him!  :-)

Isamar



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

--
Michael Welter
Introspect Telephony Corp.
Denver, Colorado
+1 303 674 2575
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.introspect.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] queue out

2004-04-19 Thread Matthew Branton
You can specify a context with single digit extensions for use in a 
queue, might be in a later cvs release here is the relevant section 
from the queues.conf

; A context may be specified, in which if the user types a SINGLE
; digit extension while they are in the queue, they will be taken out
; of the queue and sent to that extension in this context.
;
;context = qoutcon
Matt

On Apr 19, 2004, at 6:03 PM, Jose Maria Guisasola wrote:

Please:

There is some form so that a user in the queue leaves her (with a 
digit) and
the system execute another command (for example goto a voice mailbox).

My version: Asterisk CVS-04/16/04



Thanks in advance

--
Jose Mª Guisasola
Consultor Técnico
CMSI 2002 S.L.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Not working!

2004-04-19 Thread listas
I downloaded the cvs development of zaptel...
It seems to compile ok, but when ismod I get:


lp:/usr/local/src/zaptel# /sbin/insmod wcfxo.o
wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_ec_chunk
wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_unregister
wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_alarm_notify
wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_hooksig
wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_transmit
wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_receive
wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_register
lp:/usr/local/src/zaptel#
lp:/usr/local/src/zaptel# uname -a
Linux lp 2.4.24 #3 SMP Thu Jan 15 01:05:12 ART 2004 i686 unknown
lp:/usr/local/src/zaptel#
lp:/usr/local/src/zaptel# /sbin/insmod -V
insmod version 2.4.15


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Not working!

2004-04-19 Thread Vic Cross
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I downloaded the cvs development of zaptel...
 It seems to compile ok, but when ismod I get:
 
 
 lp:/usr/local/src/zaptel# /sbin/insmod wcfxo.o
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_ec_chunk
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_unregister
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_alarm_notify
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_hooksig
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_transmit
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_receive
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_register

First, 'insmod zaptel'.  Then 'insmod wcfxo'.

Or, 'modprobe wcfxo'.

Cheers,
Vic Cross
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] -- MARK --

2004-04-19 Thread Steve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 19 April 2004 10:47 pm, Michael Welter wrote:
 Well that's what I thought.  The syslog had 'asterisk' as the sending
 process, so I assumed it was a debug statement from Mark S.  sigh

You guys are funny! Mark Spenser! Haha! I knew immediately it was from Mark 
Musone!

 Mike

 Isamar Maia wrote:
 On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Michael Welter wrote:
 Every half hour I get -- MARK -- in the syslog.  Is this normal
  behavior?
 
 This has nothing to be with asterisk, but with your linux installation.
 Yes, it is a normal behavior and it is harmless... It is just a half
  hour stamp to your syslog...
 
  I think it was because of MARK Spencer... burn him!  :-)
 
  Isamar
 
 
 
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

- -- 
Steve

They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAhJWCljK16xgETzkRAmf+AJ4uFA4axZUBmY6DXCJYBc+R/9MDLgCg45Z7
pxE/MoO1r4gI4QCzXluRFgc=
=JySD
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RV: [Asterisk-Users] Not working!

2004-04-19 Thread listas



You where SOO right.
My idea is to connect the line to my pbx and call from internet
(h323?) to my linux box, and then dial an extension.. Is there any doc
there? Cause Ive read a few and I did not get much really. I should
configure asterisk now and the job is done?

-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Vic Cross
Enviado el: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 12:05 AM
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Not working!


On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I downloaded the cvs development of zaptel...
 It seems to compile ok, but when ismod I get:
 
 
 lp:/usr/local/src/zaptel# /sbin/insmod wcfxo.o
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_ec_chunk
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_unregister
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_alarm_notify
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_hooksig
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_transmit
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_receive
 wcfxo.o: unresolved symbol zt_register

First, 'insmod zaptel'.  Then 'insmod wcfxo'.

Or, 'modprobe wcfxo'.

Cheers,
Vic Cross
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Need Help with Dial Plan

2004-04-19 Thread AstGrp
Just an update resolved my own issue


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of AstGrp
Posted At: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:25 PM
Posted To: Asterisk User Group
Conversation: Need Help with Dial Plan
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Need Help with Dial Plan


Let me lay it out for you

Call comes in over a T1 - Signal is em_w.  The extension is seen as
*callerid*last 4 digits of number being called*.  Which is fine in
it self.

I have my extension.conf file set up as follows...


[did]

; Receive call as *calling*called
exten = _.,1,Answer
exten = _.,2,Cut(CALLING=EXTEN,*,2)
exten = _.,3,SetCIDNum(${CALLING})
exten = _.,4,Cut(CALLED=EXTEN,*,3)
exten = _.,5,Goto(main,${CALLED},1)

include = main

[main]

exten = 0031,1,Answer
exten = 0031,2,Goto(TNE-SG,s,1)

Include = did
include = TNE-SG

[TNE-SG]

exten = s,1,Answer
;exten = s,2,agi,tne.agi
exten = s,2,Background(tne-main-thanks)
exten = s,3,Background(tne-main-menu)
exten = 1,1,Goto(default-tne,9100,1)
exten = 2,1,Goto(default-tne,4100,1)
exten = 3,1,Goto(default-tne,4200,1)
exten = 4,1,Goto(default-tne,4300,1)
exten = 5,1,Goto(default-tne,4400,1)
exten = 6,1,Goto(tne-main-menu,s,3)
exten = 7,1,Hangup

include = default-tne
include = main

[default-tne]

include = TNE-SG

; Geoff Clark
exten = 4001,1,Macro(stdexten,4001,SIP/gclark)
;exten = 4001,1,Dial(IAX/home:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = 4004,1,Macro(stdexten,4004,SIP/home)

; Kyle Elworthy
exten = 4002,1,Macro(stdexten,4002,SIP/kelworth)
exten = 4003,1,Macro(stdexten,4003,SIP/khome)

; Tech Support Agents
exten = *6,1,AgentCallbackLogin(4001,[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = *7,1,AgentCallbackLogin(4002,[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = 401,1,Dial(Zap/g1/7046223905)
exten = 402,1,Dial(Zap/g1/7049071514)

exten = 411,1,Answer
exten = 411,2,Wait,2
exten = 411,3,Background(auth-thankyou)
exten = 411,4,Queue(tech-supp)

Where the problem comes in is - I can dial in fine in this scenerio -
but when I go to make an outbound call, it calls the did context and
cut's the call up.  

My problem appears to be I need it one way but not the other.. I hope
this makes since...

Thanks,

-gcc
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Fwd: Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX config documentation]

2004-04-19 Thread Brian Cuthie
Boy after really digging into this, I have discovered that there is more 
information about each of these topics than I previously realized. 
Strangely, searching the wiki on iax returns exactly nothing. But 
searching on iax2 does start to dig up some good stuff.

Sorry for the hassle. Tough day.

-brian

 Original Message 
Subject: 	Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX config documentation
Date: 	Mon, 19 Apr 2004 21:22:44 -0400
From: 	Brian Cuthie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 	[EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: 	[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



I know that this stuff is. What I'm looking for is an overview of how 
these features work in the context of IAX. For instance, trunking is a 
concept I think we all get. But how do you use IAX to establish trunking 
between two switches?  What's the effect of turning the transfer 
option on? How are dialplans shared between switches that are connected 
via IAX? What kinds of authentication are supported? How are keys managed?

-brian

Steven Critchfield wrote:

On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 16:08, Brian Cuthie wrote:
 

Is there any documentation on configuring IAX between * machines?  I've 
noticed references to many topics in the config files, including:

- dialplans
   

This is extensions.conf work. Some of it can be shared via the switch
command.
 

- trunking
   

Trunking is easy, think of it kind of like a channelized t1. It combines
many calls into one packet with call data so as to reduce the overhead
of each individual call having it's own resources. Specifically it cuts
down on the overhead in IP, and allows you to reclaim some of the
bandwidth for more calls.
 

- authentication
   

You do want to know who is trying to call you don't you?

 

- transfers
   

Allows you to get out of the middle of a call. My office loves these as
our trunk lines are remote, and when we forward a call out to another
trunk line, our local asterisk machine transfers the call back to the
machine with trunk lines and removes the VoIP part of the loop.
 

But before I go and try to grok 8000 lines of source (in one file, no 
less) I was hoping that somewhere there exists even something like a man 
page that describes the configuration options.
   

There is plenty of banter on the list and info scattered about that
google will find for you than reading the source. Of course, you are
free to bludgen yourself with the code if you so wish. 

 

There's the beginnings of a whitepaper on wiki, but it's 
self-contradictory in some places, largely incomplete, and just kind of 
ends abruptly. Yet, it mentions that growing contingent of IAX devices. Huh.
   

Jump in and help finish it when you have read some and start to
understand the missing parts.
 



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users