Re: [Asterisk-Users] real-time priority , -p switch

2005-08-12 Thread Peter Svensson
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Joseph wrote:

 In this case could somebody explain to me why run asterisk with ''-p
 switch?
 According to asterisk man explanation for -p is as follow:
 
 If supported by the operating system (and executing as root), attempt
 to
 run with realtime  priority for  increased  performance  and
 responsiveness within the Asterisk process, at the expense of other
 programs running on the same machine.
 
 Since Linux is not RTOS, why some folks are using this -p switch?
 It has no effect on standard Linux box.

Linux is not a hard realtime os with guaranteed timing. What the -p flag 
does is to request the realtime scheduler. This means a process wil no 
longer be subjected to the stanadrd unix scheduling but rather use a 
strict priority scheduling. The net result is that once a process using 
the realtime scheduler is ready to run the kernel wihh schedule it as soon 
as possible. It will only be preempted by realtime processes of the same 
or better priority.

With the addition of the lowlatency patches the worst case latency for 
userspace applications is very low. The remaining difference between a 
hard RT os is the guarantees it can make.

Peter


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] list in asterisk cli is getting too long

2005-08-12 Thread Hilton Williams
- Original Message - 
From: Ronald Wiplinger 
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 6:04 AM

Subject: [Asterisk-Users] list in asterisk cli is getting too long

How can I use something like|morein CLI ?

The lists are getting too long, like   sip show users


Hi

If all you need is to browse the list of users, and you don't need 
to be in the CLI all the time, you can do something like:


asterisk -rx sip show users | more

from the Unix command line. 


Regards
Hilton


Datatex Dynamics CC 
Web site http://www.datatex.co.za/ 
Email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Tel +27215924033

Fax +27215924077

The use of the Datatex e-mail facility is not permitted
for the distribution of chain letters or offensive email
of any nature whatsoever. Datatex hereby distances itself
from and accepts no liability in respect of the
unauthorised use of its e-mail facility or the sending of
e-mail communications for other than strictly business
purposes. Datatex furthermore disclaims liability for any
unauthorised instruction for which permission was not
granted. Any recipient of an unacceptable communication,
a chain letter or offensive material of any nature is
requested to report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Peter Svensson
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Geoff Manning wrote:

 We are having line noise issues in our Asterisk to legacy PBX integration.
 All SIP calls originating from IP phones sound crystal clear. All calls that
 originate from the legacy PBX (Isoetec 228) and route through the Asterisk
 and out SIP have a lot of line noise.
 
 I believe I have it pinned down to these Blue Alarm errors that I can see on
 the legacy PBX side. zttool shows no alarm but when I view the T1 stats on
 the Isoetec I see numerous Blue Alarms.

A blue alarm sounds really strange. That indicates that the remote end
(asterisk) in this case does not want to play at all. On a T1 it is sent
as a continous series of unframed 1:s. I am not sure if asterisk ever
sends a blue alarm (Alarm Indication Signal). 

Receiving a blue alarm is indicative of a serious problem. There should 
not be any audio at that time, since the blue alarm is actually a long 
unframed signal.

Peter



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 79XX and VLANS

2005-08-12 Thread Erik Versaevel - Infopact Netwerkdiensten BV
If you're using Cisco Switches:

Logon to the switch and go to config mode

int fa0/1
switchport access voice vlan untagged

sometheing in that direction configures the CDP to set the phone to
untagged frames.



Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:

 How ? Where ? I've been wanting to do this for ages, and never found
 an option to do so !

 Please Please Please tell all.

 (I hate begging, but sometimes )

 Julian.

 Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:

 Matthew Boehm wrote:

 Hey gang,
  We have about 30 Cisco 79XX phones all running latest 7.5 SIP. We
 are also using all Cisco Switches and Routers. Everything works
 great except that when you reboot a phone it takes like 3-5 minutes
 for it to come up.

  The phones spend tons of time 'Configuring VLAN..' We don't run any
 VLANs. Is there some way to skip this?

  In the 'Network Settings' I have both 'Operational VLAN Id' and
 'Admin VLAN Id' set to blank values.



 Disable CDP on the phone.


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] TE405P V2 changes?

2005-08-12 Thread Master Abi

Hi

I got the 2nd Gen firmware upgraded on the TE405P.  I recompiled after 
putting in the upgraded board but did not change any conf, but the spans 
become active but will not come up.


I guess I am missing something or are the any changes to the 
zaptel/libpri software that is required. I cannot find any info about 
this or does this new firmware only work with latest CVS. I am using 
1.0.9 with 2.6.12 kernel


Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196
Found TE4XXP at base address fdfff000, remapped to f8928000
TE4XXP version c01a0164, burst ON, slip debug: OFF
TE4XXP running with work queues.
FALC version: 0005, Board ID: 00
Reg 0: 0x364e9400
Reg 1: 0x364e9000
Reg 2: 0x
Reg 3: 0x
Reg 4: 0x0001
Reg 5: 0x
Reg 6: 0xc01a0164
Reg 7: 0x1f00
Reg 8: 0x
Reg 9: 0x00ff
Reg 10: 0x
TE4XXP: Launching card: 0
TE4XXP: Setting up global serial parameters
Found a Wildcard: Wildcard TE405P (2nd Gen)
eth0: link up, 10Mbps, half-duplex, lpa 0x
About to enter spanconfig!
Done with spanconfig!
About to enter spanconfig!
Done with spanconfig!
Unassigning channel 0/1!
Unassigning channel 0/2!
Unassigning channel 0/3!
Unassigning channel 0/4!
Unassigning channel 0/5!
Unassigning channel 0/6!
Unassigning channel 0/7!
Unassigning channel 0/8!
Unassigning channel 0/9!
Unassigning channel 0/10!
Unassigning channel 0/11!
Unassigning channel 0/12!
Unassigning channel 0/13!
Unassigning channel 0/14!
Unassigning channel 0/15!
Unassigning channel 0/16!
Unassigning channel 0/17!
Unassigning channel 0/18!
etc...

This was working for 10 months before the upgrade.

Master


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] My users are using PSTN instead of VoIP

2005-08-12 Thread Ronald Wiplinger

Some of my customers are using PSTN to call each other from the VoIP system.

I want to stop that, by setting up all internal numbers to be reachable 
via VoIP first.


E.g.   A calls B  via VoipJet !!! But B is on our system.
I want now set it up so that if B is reachable via VoIP, than it should 
call this number directly.


I could now setup all these extensions and avoid so VoipJet, but I 
wonder, if not there is a simpler way via private ENUM ..


Has anybody done that?


bye

Ronald Wiplinger

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txgain for SIP?

2005-08-12 Thread Christoph Eicke
Is there an option txgain for SIP in Asterisk? My users all complain that 
their other parties think that they are way too silent even though they all 
have their mic volume all the way up and also enabled the 'mic boost' option. 
This happens with all the clients that we're using and also with different 
model headsets, so my last hope is txgain for SIP.

Thanks
Christoph
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] ZapHFC E1 PRI (cwain)

2005-08-12 Thread Bastian Schern

Hello,

I've got a Junghanns ZapHFC E1 PRI Card (cwain) and this driver writes 
very much messages into /var/log/messages like the following:


--- snip ---
Aug  2 17:58:02 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0x37
0x90 0xc3 ] 6 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:02 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0xef ]
Aug  2 17:58:02 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 4 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:12 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0x37
0x90 0xc3 ] 6 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:12 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0xef ]
Aug  2 17:58:12 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 4 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:22 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0x37
0x90 0xc3 ] 6 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:22 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0xef ]
Aug  2 17:58:22 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 4 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:23 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0x37
0x90 0xc3 ] 6 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:23 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0xef ]
Aug  2 17:58:23 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 4 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:28 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x0 0x1 0x36 0xee
0x8 0x2 0x0 0x68 0x5 0x4 0x3 0x80 0x90 0xa3 0x18 0x3 0xa9 0x83 0x81 0x6c
0xc 0x41 0x81 0x32 0x31 0x33 0x31 0x36 0x36 0x35 0x31 0x33 0x34 0x70 0xc
0xc1 0x36 0x34 0x34 0x31 0x31 0x37 0x31 0x39 0x31 0x39 0x30 0xa1 ]
Aug  2 17:58:28 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 48 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:28 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x0 0x1 0x1 0x38
0x11 0x2 ] 6 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:28 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x2 0x1 0xee 0x38
0x8 0x2 0x80 0x68 0x2 0x18 0x3 0xa9 0x83 0x81 0x1e 0x2 0x82 0x88 0x51
0x20 ] 20 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:28 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0xf0 ]
Aug  2 17:58:28 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 4 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:28 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x2 0x1 0xf0 0x38
0x8 0x2 0x80 0x68 0x1 0xdd 0xf ] 11 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:28 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0xf2 ]
Aug  2 17:58:28 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 4 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:31 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x2 0x1 0xf2 0x38
0x8 0x2 0x80 0x68 0x45 0x8 0x2 0x84 0x91 0x1e 0x2 0x82 0x88 0xdc 0xc9 ]
19 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:31 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0xf4 ]
Aug  2 17:58:31 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 4 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:31 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x0 0x1 0x38 0xf4
0x8 0x2 0x0 0x68 0x4d 0x8 0x2 0x81 0x91 ]
Aug  2 17:58:31 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 13 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:31 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x2 0x1 0xf4 0x3a
0x8 0x2 0x80 0x68 0x5a 0xab 0x84 ] 11 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:31 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0xf6 ]
Aug  2 17:58:31 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 4 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:41 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0x3b
0xfc 0x9 ] 6 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:41 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0xf7 ]
Aug  2 17:58:41 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 4 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:51 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0x3b
0xfc 0x9 ] 6 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:51 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0xf7 ]
Aug  2 17:58:51 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 4 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:57 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x2 0x1 0xf6 0x3a
0x8 0x2 0x26 0xb6 0x5 0x4 0x3 0x80 0x90 0xa3 0x18 0x3 0xa9 0x83 0x8c
0x6c 0x5 0x1 0x81 0x34 0x37 0x37 0x70 0x4 0x81 0x34 0x34 0x30 0x7d 0x2
0x91 0x81 0x9d 0x32 0x1 0x81 0xea 0xb2 ] 42 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:57 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x2 0x1 0x1 0xf8 ]
Aug  2 17:58:57 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 4 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:57 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x0 0x1 0x3a 0xf8
0x8 0x2 0xa6 0xb6 0x2 0x18 0x3 0xa9 0x83 0x8c ]
Aug  2 17:58:57 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 14 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:57 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x0 0x1 0x1 0x3c
0x35 0x44 ] 6 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:57 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 TX [ 0x0 0x1 0x3c 0xf8
0x8 0x2 0xa6 0xb6 0x1 0x1e 0x2 0x81 0x88 ]
Aug  2 17:58:57 asterisk1 kernel: ztx 13 bytes
Aug  2 17:58:57 asterisk1 kernel: cwain: card 1 RX [ 0x0 0x1 0x1 0x3e
0x27 0x67 ] 6 bytes
--- snap ---

Is ist possible to disable this?

Regards
Bastian
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 79XX and VLANS

2005-08-12 Thread Julian Lyndon-Smith

Oh damn. I'm not using cisco switches, but a dell 3348 (I know, I know)

No way to turn it off on the phone, then ?

Julian.

Erik Versaevel - Infopact Netwerkdiensten BV wrote:

If you're using Cisco Switches:

Logon to the switch and go to config mode

int fa0/1
switchport access voice vlan untagged

sometheing in that direction configures the CDP to set the phone to
untagged frames.



Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:



How ? Where ? I've been wanting to do this for ages, and never found
an option to do so !

Please Please Please tell all.

(I hate begging, but sometimes )

Julian.

Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:



Matthew Boehm wrote:



Hey gang,
We have about 30 Cisco 79XX phones all running latest 7.5 SIP. We
are also using all Cisco Switches and Routers. Everything works
great except that when you reboot a phone it takes like 3-5 minutes
for it to come up.

The phones spend tons of time 'Configuring VLAN..' We don't run any
VLANs. Is there some way to skip this?

In the 'Network Settings' I have both 'Operational VLAN Id' and
'Admin VLAN Id' set to blank values.




Disable CDP on the phone.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE405P V2 changes?

2005-08-12 Thread Kib Eki

Hi,
we also got one V2 TE405P card. It works fine now. At the moment we use for 
bridging the Pri to our old PBX.
You must use zaptel, libri and asterisk v 1.0.8 or higher. We use 1.0.9 at the 
moment.

zaptel:
after make; make install i also executed make config. This copies the correct 
startup script to /etc/init.d/zaptel. Without this it also didn't worked for me.




Master Abi wrote:

Hi

I got the 2nd Gen firmware upgraded on the TE405P.  I recompiled after 
putting in the upgraded board but did not change any conf, but the spans 
become active but will not come up.


I guess I am missing something or are the any changes to the 
zaptel/libpri software that is required. I cannot find any info about 
this or does this new firmware only work with latest CVS. I am using 
1.0.9 with 2.6.12 kernel


Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196
Found TE4XXP at base address fdfff000, remapped to f8928000
TE4XXP version c01a0164, burst ON, slip debug: OFF
TE4XXP running with work queues.
FALC version: 0005, Board ID: 00
Reg 0: 0x364e9400
Reg 1: 0x364e9000
Reg 2: 0x
Reg 3: 0x
Reg 4: 0x0001
Reg 5: 0x
Reg 6: 0xc01a0164
Reg 7: 0x1f00
Reg 8: 0x
Reg 9: 0x00ff
Reg 10: 0x
TE4XXP: Launching card: 0
TE4XXP: Setting up global serial parameters
Found a Wildcard: Wildcard TE405P (2nd Gen)
eth0: link up, 10Mbps, half-duplex, lpa 0x
About to enter spanconfig!
Done with spanconfig!
About to enter spanconfig!
Done with spanconfig!
Unassigning channel 0/1!
Unassigning channel 0/2!
Unassigning channel 0/3!
Unassigning channel 0/4!
Unassigning channel 0/5!
Unassigning channel 0/6!
Unassigning channel 0/7!
Unassigning channel 0/8!
Unassigning channel 0/9!
Unassigning channel 0/10!
Unassigning channel 0/11!
Unassigning channel 0/12!
Unassigning channel 0/13!
Unassigning channel 0/14!
Unassigning channel 0/15!
Unassigning channel 0/16!
Unassigning channel 0/17!
Unassigning channel 0/18!
etc...

This was working for 10 months before the upgrade.

Master


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Billion BRI PCI card

2005-08-12 Thread John Fawcett
I'm looking at experimenting with asterisk with an ISDN BRI and ISDN
phones (since I have these already).

I saw that the Billion card was cheap and could be used in either TE or
NT modes.

I have the following question which I couldn't answer by reading through
the manual. Maybe someone has experience of using this card and can help
me out.

when using in NT mode does the card require additional power or is it
able to supply enough power by itself to the S0 bus?

thanks for any help,
John



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Billion BRI PCI card

2005-08-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello,


when using in NT mode does the card require additional power or is it
able to supply enough power by itself to the S0 bus?

You will need an additional power (for example 
http://shop.beronet.com/product_info.php/products_id/48).


Best regards

Blaise
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Billion BRI PCI card

2005-08-12 Thread Christoph Eicke
On Friday 12 August 2005 09:43, John Fawcett wrote:
 when using in NT mode does the card require additional power or is it
 able to supply enough power by itself to the S0 bus?

I don't know the exact specifics about the Billion card, but I have a setup 
where I have an extra NTBA connected to the ISDN card (S0 bus coming from 
ISDN card into NTBA, cable needs to be crossed) and then my ISDN phones are 
connected to the S0 bus coming out of the NTBA.
I assume that the Billion card works in a similar fashion and doesn't have the 
necessary power to directly connect phones to it.
I hope that this helps you a little.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Status of app_sms in 1.0.9

2005-08-12 Thread Tobias Wolf

Hello all,

can anybody how usable app_sms is? I want to use it in england (but not 
with the BT) and in Germany. Is this possible with * 1.0.9 and either 
with PRI lines or with simple ISDN and an AVM Fritz! Card??


Thx in advance,

Tobias Wolf
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 79XX and VLANS

2005-08-12 Thread Peter Braidwood
I have a * system at home with mainly 7960's. I run a trunk into each of the 
phones, it is the only way to get cos bits set correctly from the phone into 
the switch. I then translate the cos bits into DSCP for layer 3. I have 
separate vlans for voice and data, * server has 2 nic's one in each vlan.

It has the side effect that 'Configuring VLAN' takes about 5 seconds.

Peter

 -Original Message-
 From: Matthew Boehm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 11 August 2005 20:26
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 79XX and VLANS
 
 
 Hey gang,
   We have about 30 Cisco 79XX phones all running latest 7.5 
 SIP. We are 
 also using all Cisco Switches and Routers. Everything works 
 great except 
 that when you reboot a phone it takes like 3-5 minutes for it 
 to come up.
 
   The phones spend tons of time 'Configuring VLAN..' We don't run any 
 VLANs. Is there some way to skip this?
 
   In the 'Network Settings' I have both 'Operational VLAN Id' 
 and 'Admin 
 VLAN Id' set to blank values.
 
   Any ideas?
 
 Thanks,
 Matthew
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 __
 __
 This email has been scanned for all viruses by the Star 
 Internet Virus Screen.
 The service is provided in partnership with MessageLabs, the 
 email security company.
 For more information on a higher level of virus protection 
 visit www.star.net.uk
 __
 __
 


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Install just to play with experiment

2005-08-12 Thread Michael Jones
Is there a significant difference between the features set of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and regular asterisk? (important missing features?)

About the cautions..  You're not kidding.. It blew out the hard drive
without so much as a you sure you want to do this?.

Unfortunately I figured this out too late.. fortunately it was only a test
system that won't take long to return to it's previous state..   I may even
use it as Asterisk's permanent home.. A dual P3 500 server class intel
board.. 

- Michael




 From: Tom Rymes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:45:55 -0400
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Install just to play with experiment
 
 Considering your description, I think that you should definitely try
 out [EMAIL PROTECTED] It includes AMP already configured and working,
 and makes it very easy to configure and set up a SOHO system. you can
 even set it up to make and receive phone calls by configuring an
 account at Teliax, VoipJet (outgoing only, no incoming as of yet...),
 or Broadvoice.
 
 Go to asteriskathome.sourceforge.net and dowload the ISO fiile. As
 mentioned earlier, BE CAREFUL!!! This CD will format your hard
 drive, wipe out all data, and install a new CentOS system without
 asking for your say-so.
 
 Tom
 
 On Aug 11, 2005, at 6:37 PM, Francesco Peeters wrote:
 
 On Fri, August 12, 2005 0:25, Doug Lytle said:
 
 Michael Jones wrote:
 
 
 
 Is there a quick configuration that can be put into place to simply
 experiment with the system (like create a couple of extensions
 wit Xlite
 and
 make a internal phone system in my office that doesn't really
 go out
 anywhere - or maybe connects to a voip provider later)?
 
 
 
 
 If you compile from source you can do a make samples .
 
 Doug
 
 
 
 And otherwise, you can try Asterisk @ Home, but be warned that it
 installs
 a complete new system, so do not try it on an existing machine you
 do not
 wish to be wiped clean first!
 
 -- 
 Francesco Peeters
 
 GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C  D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704
 If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit
 http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA
 certificate.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Supervised transfer problem with BudgetTone

2005-08-12 Thread Nicolas Schmerber

The VoIP Connection a écrit :


Nicolas,

Just did some quick testing and the instructions are incorrect.  You need to
press transfer to complete the transfer instead of the second flash.
This actually makes more sense.

Attended and regular transfer both work perfectly with the following
settings:

Enable Call Features: Yes
Disable call Waiting: No
Send Flash event: No

DTMF should be whatever * is set to, but in-band won't work properly if your
codec is anything other than U-Law.

By the way, the newest firmware also makes the long overdue conference
feature work properly.

Michael Crown
Managing Partner
www.thevoipconnection.com
321.989.6728 ext. 611
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 


-Original Message-
From: Nicolas Schmerber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users 
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Supervised transfer problem 
with BudgetTone


The VoIP Connection a écrit :

   


Section 4.3.7.2 from the Bugetone Manual:

The user can transfer an active call to a third party with 
 


announcement.
   

The user presses the “flash” button and hears a dial tone, then dial 
the 3rd party’s phone number followed by pressing send 
 

button. If the 
   

call is answered, press “flash” to complete the transfer 
 

operation, if 
   

the call is not answered, pressing “flash” button to resume the 
original call.


Notes:

• If attended Transfer fails, the BudgeTone phone will ring 
 

the user to 
   

remind that another party is still on the call, the user can 
 

then pick 
   


up the call using handset or speaker.

Michael Crown
Managing Partner
www.thevoipconnection.com
321.989.6728 ext. 611
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




 


-Original Message-
From: Nicolas Schmerber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 5:59 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Supervised transfer problem with 
BudgetTone


[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :

  

   


On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Nicolas Schmerber wrote:





 

All the features I need work just not one : the supervised call 
transfers. I know there are a lot of posts about that, but
  

   


none gave
  

   


me the correct answer (unless I missed it).
 

  

   


Hi,

You'll need to switch to the CVS-HEAD version of Asterisk in


 


order to
  

   


have supervised transfers.

Steve

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users






 

When looking at a recent firmware changelog of Grandstream 
   

, it says 
   


BT should support supervised transfer, so shouldnt it work ?


  

   


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




 


Tried this manipulation a few minutes ago :

A calls B , B pushes flash button ( A is waiting with a mp3 
played) B calls C pressing Send ; C answers B presses flash 
button again ; C is so on hold (with a mp3 played) B hangs up 
But A and C arent in connect ; the phoneof B rings ( to tell 
someone is in wait : A)


So it seems to fail

What should i put in grandstream config for the next item :
/Enable Call Features: Y/ N ?
//Disable Call-Waiting: Y/N ?
//Send DTMF: / in-audio / via RTP (RFC2833) / via SIP INFO 
/Send Flash Event: Y / N ? / Any others Ideas ?.


Thx

Nicolas S.

   



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 


Thank you all, now it works
The last method (grandsteam manual but with transfer key instead) was 
the right


Thanks

Nicolas



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Help with calling Perl AGI interface

2005-08-12 Thread Matt Darnell
 I'll second that. Make sure your script is in
 /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin and you have the right permissions on it. I
 really just wanted to reply to your post though to congraduate you,
 Dan Marino, on your recent induction into the Pro Football Hall of
 Fame ;)

Sorry, wrong Dan Marino!

-Dan
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Help with calling Perl AGI interface

2005-08-12 Thread Matt Darnell
On 8/10/05, Jean-Michel Hiver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dan Marino wrote:
 
 I have installed the Perl library from
 http://asterisk.gnuinter.net/asterisk-perl and am wondering how I
 reference agi-test.agi from extensions.conf
 
 I have added
 exten = s,1,AGI,agi-test.agi
 but that doesn't seem to do it.
 
 Is there a certain directory .agi files should be, is that the problem?
 
 
 Depending on your asterisk install, the agi-bin directory can be
 somewhere like /var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin or /usr/share/asterisk/agi-bin
 
 locate agi-bin is your friend :)
 
 Cheers,
 Jean-Michel.


Thanks!

I found the agi-bin  it is working

-Matt
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] SIP_HEADER

2005-08-12 Thread Tomáš Komárek

Anybody knows, how to use the SIP_HEADER function?

Thanks

Tomas
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Cisco 7920 boot causes 7940 to release DHCP lease

2005-08-12 Thread Louis-David Mitterrand
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:12:32PM +0100, Mark Thorpe wrote:
 I have been trying to solve a problem wherby when I boot a cisco 7920 my
 7940 seeks a new IP and the dhcpd log shows it released its existing IP.  In
 searching for the solution I notice there were 2 messages on this list in
 Aug  Sep 2004 which raised the problem, but I could not find any answer was
 posted.

I've noticed the same issue. Haven't tried it with 79[46]0's 7.5
firmware.

A workaround would be to give a static addres to your 7920.

Let me know if you find a solution.

-- 
I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious.
--Albert Einstein

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie Question: Building an Asterisk system toreplace an old PBX but using existing phone

2005-08-12 Thread Sean Rima
Michael Boger Jr wrote:
 Sean,
 
 What kind of hotel do you have? Some PMS vendors require the call accounting
 and check-in interfaces to their system. I am not aware that asterisk
 supports these serial interfaces.
 

No they have no call accounting etc as such everything is done manually.
I will work out printing at a later stage

Sean

-- 
ICQ: 679813FidoNet: 2:263/950
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AOL: tcobone
Vodafone Messenger: thecivvie


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question

2005-08-12 Thread Rudolf Ladyzhenskii

Hi, all

I want voicemails to be delivered to recepients by e-mail. I have set up 
voicenail, and I can see asterisk is using sendmail to send messages out.
Using Ethereal, I can see that messages are leaving my network, but 
receipeint mail server never replies back. As a result, mail delivery is 
timed out.


I got a book on sendmail and it looks quite complex. It will take quite a 
bit of time to find out what is going on. I am using FC3 and sendmail uses 
default configuration. Is teher a quick tweak I can do to get it to work? 
May be someone can suggest another mail program that is easier to setup?


Messages sent from command line behave same way as ones sent from asterisks, 
so it is definetely a sendmail configuration issue.


Thanks a lot,
Rudolf 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question

2005-08-12 Thread Wei Kun
Default sendmail should work. Try to test sendmail from console. Some SMTP
maybe block the email.

run mail to see if your email is bounced back.

Kun


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rudolf
Ladyzhenskii
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 5:10 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question


Hi, all

I want voicemails to be delivered to recepients by e-mail. I have set up
voicenail, and I can see asterisk is using sendmail to send messages out.
Using Ethereal, I can see that messages are leaving my network, but
receipeint mail server never replies back. As a result, mail delivery is
timed out.

I got a book on sendmail and it looks quite complex. It will take quite a
bit of time to find out what is going on. I am using FC3 and sendmail uses
default configuration. Is teher a quick tweak I can do to get it to work?
May be someone can suggest another mail program that is easier to setup?

Messages sent from command line behave same way as ones sent from asterisks,
so it is definetely a sendmail configuration issue.

Thanks a lot,
Rudolf

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question

2005-08-12 Thread Rudolf Ladyzhenskii

Thanks for reply.

I would expect it to work too, but it does not. I tried to send mail from 
console -- same result. Messages are just sitting in teh queue. sendmail 
times out sending them. Mail does not bounce.


Rudolf

- Original Message - 
From: Wei Kun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 7:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question



Default sendmail should work. Try to test sendmail from console. Some SMTP
maybe block the email.

run mail to see if your email is bounced back.

Kun


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rudolf
Ladyzhenskii
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 5:10 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question


Hi, all

I want voicemails to be delivered to recepients by e-mail. I have set up
voicenail, and I can see asterisk is using sendmail to send messages out.
Using Ethereal, I can see that messages are leaving my network, but
receipeint mail server never replies back. As a result, mail delivery is
timed out.

I got a book on sendmail and it looks quite complex. It will take quite a
bit of time to find out what is going on. I am using FC3 and sendmail uses
default configuration. Is teher a quick tweak I can do to get it to work?
May be someone can suggest another mail program that is easier to setup?

Messages sent from command line behave same way as ones sent from 
asterisks,

so it is definetely a sendmail configuration issue.

Thanks a lot,
Rudolf

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Billion BRI PCI card

2005-08-12 Thread Christian Victor

when using in NT mode does the card require additional power or is it
able to supply enough power by itself to the S0 bus?

You will need an additional power (for example 
http://shop.beronet.com/product_info.php/products_id/48).


This is for the 4xBRI or 8xBRI cards from Beronet. The Billion 1xBRI has 
net the necessary connectors on it. You will need network terminator 
(NTBA) a selfmase power supply if the phones on the BRI have no own 
power supply.


Christian
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question

2005-08-12 Thread Rudolf Ladyzhenskii

I think, I just sorted i out.

I have to run sendmail with optiosn -bm to be a mail sender. Without it, it 
seems that sendmail is trying to use outside server for delivery. Without 
valid username, this will not work...


Rudolf

- Original Message - 
From: Rudolf Ladyzhenskii [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question



Thanks for reply.

I would expect it to work too, but it does not. I tried to send mail from 
console -- same result. Messages are just sitting in teh queue. sendmail 
times out sending them. Mail does not bounce.


Rudolf

- Original Message - 
From: Wei Kun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 7:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question


Default sendmail should work. Try to test sendmail from console. Some 
SMTP

maybe block the email.

run mail to see if your email is bounced back.

Kun


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rudolf
Ladyzhenskii
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 5:10 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question


Hi, all

I want voicemails to be delivered to recepients by e-mail. I have set up
voicenail, and I can see asterisk is using sendmail to send messages out.
Using Ethereal, I can see that messages are leaving my network, but
receipeint mail server never replies back. As a result, mail delivery is
timed out.

I got a book on sendmail and it looks quite complex. It will take quite a
bit of time to find out what is going on. I am using FC3 and sendmail 
uses

default configuration. Is teher a quick tweak I can do to get it to work?
May be someone can suggest another mail program that is easier to setup?

Messages sent from command line behave same way as ones sent from 
asterisks,

so it is definetely a sendmail configuration issue.

Thanks a lot,
Rudolf

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question

2005-08-12 Thread Wei Kun
how come you said mail is send out but still in the queue? Does it send out
or not?

Kun


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rudolf
Ladyzhenskii
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 5:33 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question


Thanks for reply.

I would expect it to work too, but it does not. I tried to send mail from
console -- same result. Messages are just sitting in teh queue. sendmail
times out sending them. Mail does not bounce.

Rudolf

- Original Message -
From: Wei Kun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 7:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question


 Default sendmail should work. Try to test sendmail from console. Some SMTP
 maybe block the email.

 run mail to see if your email is bounced back.

 Kun


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rudolf
 Ladyzhenskii
 Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 5:10 PM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question


 Hi, all

 I want voicemails to be delivered to recepients by e-mail. I have set up
 voicenail, and I can see asterisk is using sendmail to send messages out.
 Using Ethereal, I can see that messages are leaving my network, but
 receipeint mail server never replies back. As a result, mail delivery is
 timed out.

 I got a book on sendmail and it looks quite complex. It will take quite a
 bit of time to find out what is going on. I am using FC3 and sendmail uses
 default configuration. Is teher a quick tweak I can do to get it to work?
 May be someone can suggest another mail program that is easier to setup?

 Messages sent from command line behave same way as ones sent from
 asterisks,
 so it is definetely a sendmail configuration issue.

 Thanks a lot,
 Rudolf

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Billion BRI PCI card

2005-08-12 Thread Christian Victor

I'm looking at experimenting with asterisk with an ISDN BRI and ISDN
phones (since I have these already).

I saw that the Billion card was cheap and could be used in either TE or
NT modes.

I have the following question which I couldn't answer by reading through
the manual. Maybe someone has experience of using this card and can help
me out.

when using in NT mode does the card require additional power or is it
able to supply enough power by itself to the S0 bus?


The cards feeds no power to the s0. If the phone has its own power 
supply normally it will work without external power supply. Otherwise 
you will need a network terminator (NTBA) or a selfmade power injector.


Christian
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question

2005-08-12 Thread Rudolf Ladyzhenskii

Old messages are in the queue.

I can see sendmail is trying to talk to the remote mail server, but never 
gets a responce and times out. So message stays in the queue.


Rudolf

- Original Message - 
From: Wei Kun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 7:50 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question


how come you said mail is send out but still in the queue? Does it send 
out

or not?

Kun


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rudolf
Ladyzhenskii
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 5:33 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question


Thanks for reply.

I would expect it to work too, but it does not. I tried to send mail from
console -- same result. Messages are just sitting in teh queue. sendmail
times out sending them. Mail does not bounce.

Rudolf

- Original Message -
From: Wei Kun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 7:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question


Default sendmail should work. Try to test sendmail from console. Some 
SMTP

maybe block the email.

run mail to see if your email is bounced back.

Kun


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rudolf
Ladyzhenskii
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 5:10 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question


Hi, all

I want voicemails to be delivered to recepients by e-mail. I have set up
voicenail, and I can see asterisk is using sendmail to send messages out.
Using Ethereal, I can see that messages are leaving my network, but
receipeint mail server never replies back. As a result, mail delivery is
timed out.

I got a book on sendmail and it looks quite complex. It will take quite a
bit of time to find out what is going on. I am using FC3 and sendmail 
uses

default configuration. Is teher a quick tweak I can do to get it to work?
May be someone can suggest another mail program that is easier to setup?

Messages sent from command line behave same way as ones sent from
asterisks,
so it is definetely a sendmail configuration issue.

Thanks a lot,
Rudolf

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question

2005-08-12 Thread Christoph Eicke
On Friday 12 August 2005 11:46, Rudolf Ladyzhenskii wrote:
 Old messages are in the queue.

 I can see sendmail is trying to talk to the remote mail server, but never
 gets a responce and times out. So message stays in the queue.


You should try and deliver them yourself. It sounds to me like sendmail is 
configured to relay messages using a smart host (the one it's trying to talk 
to). Do you maybe need to log in to that host in order to send mail? You can 
try this out yourself: set the DNS name of the mail server it relays it to 
in /etc/hosts to your local host, don't start sendmail as a server daemon 
(shouldn't bind to port 25) and do a nc -lt -p 25 and look what it's trying 
to do when sending mail via the command line.

Christoph
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] v92 modems

2005-08-12 Thread varun_saa
Hello, 
  Is it possible to use v92 ( a few chipsets version )  
modem as FXO PCI modules ? 
 
While googling I found some postings on the subject. 
 
Thanks 
 
Varun 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Call recording, monitor soxmix in Asterisk 1.0.9

2005-08-12 Thread Victor Alvarez




Hi,
Monitor and soxmix (m option) work fine in 
CVS Head, not in Asterisk 1.0.9, as the Wiki says.http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Monitor+setup+sample


Anyway I am wondering why asterisk 
1.0.9console shows on Hang up: "monitor executing ( nice -n 19 soxmix 
"//var/spool/asterisk/monitor/45/47-20050812-113631-in.wav" 
"//var/spool/asterisk/monitor/45/47-20050812-113631-out.wav" 
"//var/spool/asterisk/monitor/45/47-20050812-113631.wav"  rm -f 
"//var/spool/asterisk/monitor/45/47-20050812-113631-"* ) "and It doesn't work, I mean,what I find in 
/monitor/45 are the two -in and -out files.But it is curiousthatif you type the same command (nice -n 19 
etc..) from the command line, It does work. Doesanybody know why?

Kind regards,
Victor.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] TE405P / TE410P with 2nd generation firmware field upgradable?

2005-08-12 Thread Frank Sautter

hi,

after stumbling over the compile time flag in zaptel and after reading 
the new features of the 2nd generation firmware of the TE405P/TE410P, i 
was wondering if the cards are capable of upgrading the firmware in field?


regards
 frank
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] v92 modems

2005-08-12 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Friday 12 August 2005 06:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,
   Is it possible to use v92 ( a few chipsets version )
 modem as FXO PCI modules ?

Short answer: no.

Longer answer:  perhaps, but you're on your own.  Your googling efforts should 
have shown you that.  :-)

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] v92 modems

2005-08-12 Thread Madhawa Jayanath

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello, 
 Is it possible to use v92 ( a few chipsets version )  
modem as FXO PCI modules ? 

While googling I found some postings on the subject. 

Thanks 

Varun 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 


Hello,
Yes, Modem with an Ambient MD3200, Model # : AMI-IA92/IE92
The Digium products has great performance.
Buy Digium products and support Asterisk!

Cheers,
~Madhawa

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE405P V2 changes?

2005-08-12 Thread Master Abi
Are you using Redhat/Fedora? If I remember those init scripts is for 
Redhat/Fedora. I am using gentoo.


Did you make any modifications to wct4xxp.c. or pass any parameters to 
zaptel. I see there is a #define SUPPORT_GEN1 in to wct4xxp.c which I 
commented out, but it made no difference. ztcfg seems to where the 
channels become unassigned.


Thanks again.

Kib Eki wrote:

Hi,
we also got one V2 TE405P card. It works fine now. At the moment we use 
for bridging the Pri to our old PBX.
You must use zaptel, libri and asterisk v 1.0.8 or higher. We use 1.0.9 
at the moment.

zaptel:
after make; make install i also executed make config. This copies the 
correct startup script to /etc/init.d/zaptel. Without this it also 
didn't worked for me.




Master Abi wrote:


Hi

I got the 2nd Gen firmware upgraded on the TE405P.  I recompiled after 
putting in the upgraded board but did not change any conf, but the 
spans become active but will not come up.


I guess I am missing something or are the any changes to the 
zaptel/libpri software that is required. I cannot find any info about 
this or does this new firmware only work with latest CVS. I am using 
1.0.9 with 2.6.12 kernel


Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196
Found TE4XXP at base address fdfff000, remapped to f8928000
TE4XXP version c01a0164, burst ON, slip debug: OFF
TE4XXP running with work queues.
FALC version: 0005, Board ID: 00
Reg 0: 0x364e9400
Reg 1: 0x364e9000
Reg 2: 0x
Reg 3: 0x
Reg 4: 0x0001
Reg 5: 0x
Reg 6: 0xc01a0164
Reg 7: 0x1f00
Reg 8: 0x
Reg 9: 0x00ff
Reg 10: 0x
TE4XXP: Launching card: 0
TE4XXP: Setting up global serial parameters
Found a Wildcard: Wildcard TE405P (2nd Gen)
eth0: link up, 10Mbps, half-duplex, lpa 0x
About to enter spanconfig!
Done with spanconfig!
About to enter spanconfig!
Done with spanconfig!
Unassigning channel 0/1!
Unassigning channel 0/2!
Unassigning channel 0/3!
Unassigning channel 0/4!
Unassigning channel 0/5!
Unassigning channel 0/6!
Unassigning channel 0/7!
Unassigning channel 0/8!
Unassigning channel 0/9!
Unassigning channel 0/10!
Unassigning channel 0/11!
Unassigning channel 0/12!
Unassigning channel 0/13!
Unassigning channel 0/14!
Unassigning channel 0/15!
Unassigning channel 0/16!
Unassigning channel 0/17!
Unassigning channel 0/18!
etc...

This was working for 10 months before the upgrade.

Master


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Billion BRI PCI card

2005-08-12 Thread John Fawcett
Christian Victor wrote:
 
 The cards feeds no power to the s0. If the phone has its own power
 supply normally it will work without external power supply. Otherwise
 you will need a network terminator (NTBA) or a selfmade power injector.
 
 Christian

Christoph Eicke wrote:
 I don't know the exact specifics about the Billion card, but I have
 a setup where I have an extra NTBA connected to the ISDN card (S0 bus
 coming from ISDN card into NTBA, cable needs to be crossed) and then
 my ISDN phones are connected to the S0 bus coming out of the NTBA.
 I assume that the Billion card works in a similar fashion and doesn't
 have the necessary power to directly connect phones to it.
 I hope that this helps you a little.


thanks to everyone for all the replies.

I have a doubt about how to connect the NTBA, since it
has a U interface and an S0 interface with two sockets. Would I connect
the Billion card to one of the S0 sockets on the NTBA (via a crossover
cable) and then the telephone to the other S0 socket. I assume that I
don't connect anything to the U interface of the NTBA. Is that correct?

Thanks,
John


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE405P / TE410P with 2nd generation firmware field upgradable?

2005-08-12 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Friday 12 August 2005 06:59, Frank Sautter wrote:
 after stumbling over the compile time flag in zaptel and after reading
 the new features of the 2nd generation firmware of the TE405P/TE410P, i
 was wondering if the cards are capable of upgrading the firmware in field?

Unfortunately not.  It's a configuration PROM, not EEPROM or FLASH.  I am 
pretty sure that Digium has an upgrade program in place though.  It's best to 
contact them directly for these types of inquiries instead of the list.

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE405P / TE410P with 2nd generation firmware field upgradable?

2005-08-12 Thread Christian Victor

Frank Sautter schrieb:

hi,

after stumbling over the compile time flag in zaptel and after reading 
the new features of the 2nd generation firmware of the TE405P/TE410P, i 
was wondering if the cards are capable of upgrading the firmware in field?


It is said so - but I don't believe it. ;-)

Christian
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Billion BRI PCI card

2005-08-12 Thread Andreas Reich

John Fawcett wrote:

I have a doubt about how to connect the NTBA, since it
has a U interface and an S0 interface with two sockets. Would I connect
the Billion card to one of the S0 sockets on the NTBA (via a crossover
cable) and then the telephone to the other S0 socket. I assume that I
don't connect anything to the U interface of the NTBA. Is that correct?


That's correct.
You can either use a crossover cable and plug it into one of the S0 
sockets or cut an ISDN cable in half and connect it to the S0 plugs 
inside the NTBA.



Andreas
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE405P / TE410P with 2nd generation firmware field upgradable?

2005-08-12 Thread Matt Florell
Short answer: NO

Long answer: you have to send it to Digium for them to do an upgrade,
they don't have an official process for this yet and won't give you a
price, I have called and asked them many times. They also mention
upgrades from your 405/410 to a 406/411 are available too, but again
no specifics. Supposedly if you have a card with the 2nd gen firmware
on it you can upgrade to the third gen firmware, whenever it would
come out, in the field.

MATT---

On 8/12/05, Christian Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Frank Sautter schrieb:
  hi,
 
  after stumbling over the compile time flag in zaptel and after reading
  the new features of the 2nd generation firmware of the TE405P/TE410P, i
  was wondering if the cards are capable of upgrading the firmware in field?
 
 It is said so - but I don't believe it. ;-)
 
 Christian
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Voice mail to nortel PBX Option 11

2005-08-12 Thread Mark Phillips
Easily doable. I've done it twice now. Problem is that your users will 
never know they have messages waiting.


Install a T1/E1 card into the * box and then use a T1 cross-over cable 
between the 2 boxes.


Create a dialplan on the Meridian that points calls to the VM out over 
the new E1.


As for forwarding the calls when busy or no answer, that's a little more 
tricky. You'll have to come up with some rules and numbers to allow the 
 Meridian to decide what to do with those calls.


In my case I wrote a forward on no answer and a forward on busy rule for 
every phone that needed VM. When you called ext 200 the call was sent to 
  mailbox 2200 on the *.


Users will have to get into the habit of calling the VM to check if 
there's messages.


Hope that helps.

Mark

craz sead wrote:

Hi all,


Could somebody help me, i wanna connect asterisk for
voice mail in the existing nortel pbx option 11 using
e1 card ?

anyone have a clue ?  please help the conf. file 


thank all

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--

Mark, G7LTT/KC2ENI
Randolph, NJ
http://www.g7ltt.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Install just to play with experiment

2005-08-12 Thread Mark Phillips
AAH uses the latest released version of *. This is somewhat different 
to the CVS but can be considered stable for the purposes of production.


It also has the added benefits of a web front end to configure it as 
well as some other nice webby features to make life easier when running it.


The CVS and the Stable versions have to be hand crafted when dealing 
with the config files etc.


I have run both in my time. Currently I'm using AAH which for the most 
part is fine as long as I don't want to do anything that the web front 
end won't let me do. Once I start editing the config files the system 
falls apart.


Horses for courses I think.

Mark


Michael Jones wrote:

Is there a significant difference between the features set of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and regular asterisk? (important missing features?)

About the cautions..  You're not kidding.. It blew out the hard drive
without so much as a you sure you want to do this?.

Unfortunately I figured this out too late.. fortunately it was only a test
system that won't take long to return to it's previous state..   I may even
use it as Asterisk's permanent home.. A dual P3 500 server class intel
board.. 


- Michael






From: Tom Rymes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:45:55 -0400
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Install just to play with experiment

Considering your description, I think that you should definitely try
out [EMAIL PROTECTED] It includes AMP already configured and working,
and makes it very easy to configure and set up a SOHO system. you can
even set it up to make and receive phone calls by configuring an
account at Teliax, VoipJet (outgoing only, no incoming as of yet...),
or Broadvoice.

Go to asteriskathome.sourceforge.net and dowload the ISO fiile. As
mentioned earlier, BE CAREFUL!!! This CD will format your hard
drive, wipe out all data, and install a new CentOS system without
asking for your say-so.

Tom

On Aug 11, 2005, at 6:37 PM, Francesco Peeters wrote:



On Fri, August 12, 2005 0:25, Doug Lytle said:



Michael Jones wrote:




Is there a quick configuration that can be put into place to simply
experiment with the system (like create a couple of extensions
wit Xlite
and
make a internal phone system in my office that doesn't really
go out
anywhere - or maybe connects to a voip provider later)?






If you compile from source you can do a make samples .

Doug




And otherwise, you can try Asterisk @ Home, but be warned that it
installs
a complete new system, so do not try it on an existing machine you
do not
wish to be wiped clean first!

--
Francesco Peeters

GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C  D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704
If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit
http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA
certificate.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



--

Mark, G7LTT/KC2ENI
Randolph, NJ
http://www.g7ltt.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] v92 modems

2005-08-12 Thread Douglas Logan
Yes, but your results may vary. Apparently some people have problems
with clone cards (aka regular modems), dropping calls, and having
echos. (Then again some people have reported no problems at all).
E-bay is a good source for these. You can also check out this list
with more information about Asterisk clone cards here:

http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=X100P+clone



On 8/12/05, Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Friday 12 August 2005 06:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hello,
Is it possible to use v92 ( a few chipsets version )
  modem as FXO PCI modules ?
 
 Short answer: no.
 
 Longer answer:  perhaps, but you're on your own.  Your googling efforts should
 have shown you that.  :-)
 
 -A.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Voice mail to nortel PBX Option 11

2005-08-12 Thread Johann Steinwendtner

Isn't it possible to turn on MWI via background terminal ? In
that case an application needs to do this via serial interface.

best regards

Hans



Users will have to get into the habit of calling the VM to check if 
there's messages.







___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Geoff Manning
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
 Geoff Manning wrote:
 
 The TE110P card in the Asterisk server is set as the sync source:
 
 span=1,1,0,d4,ami
 em=1-24
 
 That is incorrect. You have your span configured to recover timing
 from the T1 and use that as the source for the card. If you want this
 span to be clocked using the onboard clock on the board, you must use:
 
 span=1,0,0,d4,ami

I though setting it at 0 was to tell asterisk not to be the source of the
timing. When I set it at 1 I get slip errors inplace of the blue alarms. I
must have had my logic backwards.

Thanks,
Geoff
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] re: call load balancing

2005-08-12 Thread Kevin Walsh
Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] intruder]# ps afx|more
   PID TTY  STAT   TIME COMMAND
 1 ?S  0:08 init
 2 ?SW 0:00 [keventd]
 3 ?SW 0:00 [kapmd]
 4 ?SWN0:00 [ksoftirqd_CPU0]
 9 ?SW 0:00 [bdflush]
 
 No priorities.. Am I missing something?
 
Try ps alx (Look at the NI column).

Also see man ps.

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/  _/_/
  _/_/_/   _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/  _/   K e v i n   W a l s h
 _/ _/_/  _/ _/ _/_/  _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Geoff Manning
Peter Svensson wrote:
 A blue alarm sounds really strange. That indicates that the remote end
 (asterisk) in this case does not want to play at all. On a T1 it is
 sent as a continous series of unframed 1:s. I am not sure if asterisk
 ever sends a blue alarm (Alarm Indication Signal).
 
 Receiving a blue alarm is indicative of a serious problem. There
 should not be any audio at that time, since the blue alarm is
 actually a long unframed signal.
 

Well that would explain the choppy/stuttering sound we get on these calls
since there is no audio during those error transmissions.

According to Kevin's reply I had my timing logic backwards. Should I be
using any other timing settings on the Asterisk side?? The tech for our
legacy PBX says that the PBX will not provide any timing.

Thanks,
Geoff
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question

2005-08-12 Thread Wayne Gemmell
I think it would help if you sent an excerpt from your maillog.

Cheers
Wayne
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] yahoo voice

2005-08-12 Thread Dean Collins








Only because I dont want to install yet another IM to
my existing Skype and MSN has anyone tried the new yahoo voice?

http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/scramble-to-find-voice-on-the-web/2005/08/12/1123353481827.html

http://messenger.yahoo.com/feat_voice.php





Any thoughts?



Cheers,

Dean








___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] USB handset wanted

2005-08-12 Thread Ondrej Valousek
Give me a handset with a ringer and hook that both work under Linux and 
I will buy 30 pieces on the spot!

No kidding..

Bill McCready (PCPhoneline.com) wrote:

We are planning to develop versions of our USB based phone and gateway 
products for Linux.  The plan is to make them will work like regular 
phones exactly like our Windows versions do including physically 
ringing loudly on incoming calls.


Which versions of Linux are the most popular at the moment in the 
workplace so we can decide which one to focus our energies on first?


Best regards,


Bill McCready
PCPhoneline.com

- Original Message - From: Matt Riddell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] USB handset wanted



Ondrej Valousek wrote:


Matt,

You have forgotten the ringer.
In fact, I don't care that much about LCD  buttons. I want to use 
it with something like X-lite.
Initially, I used machine builtin soundcard with X-Lite (worked 
well) but then I realized that if the phone is supposed to compete 
with the standard analog phone, it must have a working ringer.



Fair enough.

 From what I see I suppose that every handset with builtin ringer 
must be recongized to the OS as 2 USB soundcards - one for 
speaker/mike, the second as a ringer.



The ones I have worked with have a seperate ringer that just takes an 
int to decide which ringtone to play.  I.E. it is not shown as a 
soundcard.


--
Cheers,

Matt Riddell
___

http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Adtran TSU 600

2005-08-12 Thread Bartosz Jozwiak





I got a good deal on one of these channel banks loaded with 24 FXS
ports.  I know 24 seems pretty overkill for a home user, but I got this
shipped cheaper than I could have gotten a TDM400P w/ 1 FXS port.  I've
read that these are compatible w/ asterisk, but can they be used w/o a
T1?? (I'm not really sure how * is connected to the channel bank). 


Would I have to have a T100P (whatever the new model is.. T1/E1
selectable.. blah blah) and a T1 xover cable?  (If so, suddenly the deal
just got more expensive)


I have it running already for a about a year with no problems what so ever.
U need T1 (t100p is good) card for asterisk and crossover T1 cable.

Bartosz

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Possibly bad FXS module in TDM400P?

2005-08-12 Thread Jeff Borders
I've got the latest zaptel and cvs asterisk software loaded on my phone 
server running FC3.  And yes, It's fully updated and udev is setup 
correctly.  I've got a TDM400P with one FXS and one FXO module 
installed.  When I load zaptel and wctdm and run ztcfg -vvv, I get this:


[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ztcfg -vvv
ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6)

Zaptel Configuration
==


Channel map:

Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01)
Channel 02: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 02)

2 channels configured.

Regardless of my configuration, it should show up in ztcfg, right? 
Here's my:


** zaptel.conf 

loadzone = us
defaultzone = us
fxoks=1
fxsks=2

** zapata.conf 
[trunkgroups]
[channels]
language=en
context=default
switchtype=national
signalling=fxo_ks
rxwink=300  ; Atlas seems to use long (250ms) winks
usecallerid=yes
hidecallerid=no
callwaiting=no
usecallingpres=yes
callwaitingcallerid=no
threewaycalling=no
transfer=yes
canpark=yes
cancallforward=yes
callreturn=yes
mailbox=2500
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
rxgain=0.0
txgain=0.0
group=1
callgroup=1
pickupgroup=1
immediate=no
context=default
channel = 1
context=incoming
signalling=fxs_ks
group=2
channel = 2

Thanks for your help.

Jeff Borders
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP301 and 501 with asterisk...

2005-08-12 Thread Tom Rymes

Chris,

Maybe you could write a generic config file and post it to the wiki?

MAC address = 
Server IP = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
Username = user
password = pass,
Extension = 100

Just a thought

Tom

On Aug 11, 2005, at 10:15 PM, Chris Mason wrote:


Shaun Bolling wrote:


Jonathan, did you have any problem getting your polycom 301 to  
work with asterisk. I purchase two of them for testing. I have  
been trying for two days now to get them to call one another, with  
no luck. My software phones work fine. In my asterisk log I get a  
error message like Failed to authenticate user. Did you have  
this problem?




Send me the info and I will write you a config file for one phone:
MAC of phone
serverip
username (for ftp account)
password (for ftp account)
Extension number
codec preference

I'm presuming you are using DHCP to allocate TFTP setting, SNTP  
server, phone IP, Gateway.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: call does not hangup after client quits

2005-08-12 Thread Stephen J. Wilcox
Hi Jeremy,
 thanks for this, it looks like just what i was after. i've not finished 
testing 
it but it seems to do what i need.

Steve

On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Jeremy Gault wrote:

 Steve,
 
 If I am understanding your situation correctly (i.e. you are using a SIP 
 client and then forcibly disconnecting/shutting it off during a call) 
 you may want to look at your sip.conf for a setting called rtptimeout. 
 This may do exactly what you want.
 
 When on a SIP call, and you disconnect/shut off your client (without 
 properly hanging up first) then (obviously) * does not receive a SIP 
 message saying the call has ended. However, the RTP (audio) stream will 
 stop. The rtptimeout setting lets you define a time period that after 
 x seconds of no audio packets, it's assumed the SIP client has gone 
 away and the call should be terminated.
 
 Jeremy
 
 Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
 
 Hello,
  can anyone help with my problem below, searching doesnt show any results..
 
 thanks
 Steve
 
 
 On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
 
   
 
 Hi,
  I'm seeing a problem where if I place a call, then forcibly quit or turn 
  off 
 the client the call stays active.
 
 The frames counters stop so its apparent the client has gone away but the 
 call 
 remains active.
 
 Asterisk is CVS-HEAD 23-Jun-05
 
 What is supposed to happen in this scenario?
 
 thanks
 Steve
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Geoff Manning
Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
 Geoff Manning wrote:
 
 The TE110P card in the Asterisk server is set as the sync source:
 
 span=1,1,0,d4,ami
 em=1-24
 
 That is incorrect. You have your span configured to recover timing
 from the T1 and use that as the source for the card. If you want this
 span to be clocked using the onboard clock on the board, you must use:
 
 span=1,0,0,d4,ami


OK. So I changed it to:

span=1,0,0,d4,ami

And the Blue Alarms are still occurring but now in conjunction with Slip
errors. I feel like I am on the right track though.

Another thing that is happening now is every once and a while all the
channels on the span will open up and then timeout like so:

-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/3-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/5-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/6-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/7-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/8-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/9-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/10-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/11-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/12-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/13-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/14-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/15-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/16-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/17-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/18-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/19-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/20-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/21-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/22-1'
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/23-1'

Then they will timeout and hangup. I was on a call when this happened
(Zap/24-1) and it didn't hang me up. But sometimes it will terminate my call
when it happens.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] app_voicemail.c still looking for config fileeven I try to configure the voicemail from database.

2005-08-12 Thread Matthew Boehm

Wei Kun wrote:


mysql select * from extensions_table;
++--+---+--+---++
| id | context  | exten | priority | app   | appdata|
++--+---+--+---++
|  1 | from-sip | 2000  |1 | Dial  | SIP/2000|20|
|  2 | from-sip | 2000  |2 | Voicemail | u2000  |


You need to call voicemail app with a context. Change the line above to 
show [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] list in asterisk cli is getting too long

2005-08-12 Thread Matthew Boehm

Hilton Williams wrote:
- Original Message - From: Ronald Wiplinger To: Asterisk Users 
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 
6:04 AM

Subject: [Asterisk-Users] list in asterisk cli is getting too long

How can I use something like|morein CLI ?

The lists are getting too long, like   sip show users


	You can also use sip show peers like pattern to truncate the list. 
Ex: sip show peers like 300 will only show peers whos username starts 
with or contains 300.


-Matthew

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Install just to play with experiment

2005-08-12 Thread Tom Rymes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not a feature limited version of asterisk designed for home  
users. It is actually a collection of various software projects,  
including Asterisk stable, the AMP Web interface, SugarCRM, a Cisco  
phone configuration editor, plus ConfigEdit and a bunch of other  
stuff, all nicely tied together.


On the other hand, Asterisk by default is a blank slate and there are  
extremely few limitations on how you can configure it to meet your  
needs. Extreme flexibility is the rule, and many do not like that  
GUIs (AMP included) necessarily place limits on this flexibility. As  
a result, it is harder to make more complex customizations.


However, I think that the average user will actually find that AMP  
brings some order to the chaos that is Asterisk. Rather than  
limiting their freedom, many users see it as saving them from  
reinventing the wheel and having to learn the minutiae of Asterisk  
configuration. In addition, if you are willing to invest some time  
studying the inner workings of AMP, you can figure out how it works  
and place custom programming in the /etc/asterisk/ 
extensions_custom.conf file.


In the end, it depends on what type of user you are, and what you  
want to accomplish. If you want to develop an easy to use and  
configure replacement for a traditional PBX that does not require you  
to really get into the nuts and bolts of dilaplans, etc, then I think  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is for you. If you want to get into more complex things such as  
connecting databases to your system to let customers access their  
data interactively, etc, then you probably want to avoid the GUI,  
because it will limit your flexibility.


As with most everything else, it depends!

Tom

On Aug 12, 2005, at 4:37 AM, Michael Jones wrote:

Is there a significant difference between the features set of  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

and regular asterisk? (important missing features?)

About the cautions..  You're not kidding.. It blew out the hard drive
without so much as a you sure you want to do this?.

Unfortunately I figured this out too late.. fortunately it was only  
a test
system that won't take long to return to it's previous state..   I  
may even

use it as Asterisk's permanent home.. A dual P3 500 server class intel
board..

- Michael






From: Tom Rymes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:45:55 -0400
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Install just to play with experiment

Considering your description, I think that you should definitely try
out [EMAIL PROTECTED] It includes AMP already configured and working,
and makes it very easy to configure and set up a SOHO system. you can
even set it up to make and receive phone calls by configuring an
account at Teliax, VoipJet (outgoing only, no incoming as of yet...),
or Broadvoice.

Go to asteriskathome.sourceforge.net and dowload the ISO fiile. As
mentioned earlier, BE CAREFUL!!! This CD will format your hard
drive, wipe out all data, and install a new CentOS system without
asking for your say-so.

Tom

On Aug 11, 2005, at 6:37 PM, Francesco Peeters wrote:



On Fri, August 12, 2005 0:25, Doug Lytle said:



Michael Jones wrote:





Is there a quick configuration that can be put into place to  
simply

experiment with the system (like create a couple of extensions
wit Xlite
and
make a internal phone system in my office that doesn't really
go out
anywhere - or maybe connects to a voip provider later)?






If you compile from source you can do a make samples .

Doug





And otherwise, you can try Asterisk @ Home, but be warned that it
installs
a complete new system, so do not try it on an existing machine you
do not
wish to be wiped clean first!

--
Francesco Peeters

GPG Key = AA69 E7C6 1D8A F148 160C  D5C4 9943 6E38 D5E3 7704
If your program doesn't recognize my signature, please visit
http://www.CAcert.org/index.php?id=3 to retrieve the Root CA
certificate.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE405P / TE410P with 2nd generation firmware field upgradable?

2005-08-12 Thread Kevin P. Fleming

Matt Florell wrote:


Long answer: you have to send it to Digium for them to do an upgrade,
they don't have an official process for this yet and won't give you a
price, I have called and asked them many times. They also mention
upgrades from your 405/410 to a 406/411 are available too, but again
no specifics. Supposedly if you have a card with the 2nd gen firmware
on it you can upgrade to the third gen firmware, whenever it would
come out, in the field.


We do 2nd gen firmware upgrades for customers every day, have been doing 
them for a couple of weeks now. The process is simple, just contact the 
RMA department and be prepared to pay for shipping the card to and from 
our facility.


Once the card has 2nd gen firmware on it, future upgrades will be 
possible in place, without having to send the card to us.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE405P / TE410P with 2nd generation firmware field upgradable?

2005-08-12 Thread Kevin P. Fleming

Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:

Unfortunately not.  It's a configuration PROM, not EEPROM or FLASH.  I am 
pretty sure that Digium has an upgrade program in place though.  It's best to 
contact them directly for these types of inquiries instead of the list.


Actually, it is EEPROM, and will be upgradeable in the field once the 
card has 2nd gen firmware installed on it.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Matthew Crocker
Well that would explain the choppy/stuttering sound we get on these  
calls

since there is no audio during those error transmissions.

According to Kevin's reply I had my timing logic backwards. Should  
I be
using any other timing settings on the Asterisk side?? The tech for  
our

legacy PBX says that the PBX will not provide any timing.


One side of the T1 needs to provide timing and the other needs to  
recover timing from the line.  If the PBX will not provide any timing  
then you need to make sure that Asterisk *is* providing the timing.


-Matt

--
Matthew S. Crocker
Vice President
Crocker Communications, Inc.
Internet Division
PO BOX 710
Greenfield, MA 01302-0710
http://www.crocker.com

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question

2005-08-12 Thread Tom Rymes
RedHat also configures their sendmail to not accept connections from  
any servers other than the localhost. Although I wouldn't expect that  
to affect outgoing mail, I have found that it often does.


Google for redhat sendmail DAEMON_OPTIONS 127.0.0.1

Or check out this article: http://www.joreybump.com/code/howto/ 
smtpauth.html and look for DAEMON_OPTIONS .


Tom

On Aug 12, 2005, at 5:09 AM, Rudolf Ladyzhenskii wrote:


Hi, all

I want voicemails to be delivered to recepients by e-mail. I have  
set up voicenail, and I can see asterisk is using sendmail to send  
messages out.
Using Ethereal, I can see that messages are leaving my network, but  
receipeint mail server never replies back. As a result, mail  
delivery is timed out.


I got a book on sendmail and it looks quite complex. It will take  
quite a bit of time to find out what is going on. I am using FC3  
and sendmail uses default configuration. Is teher a quick tweak I  
can do to get it to work? May be someone can suggest another mail  
program that is easier to setup?


Messages sent from command line behave same way as ones sent from  
asterisks, so it is definetely a sendmail configuration issue.


Thanks a lot,
Rudolf
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] help on receive text

2005-08-12 Thread someshwarak
Hi Matt,

Thanks for the information.

regards
Somesh

-Original Message-
From: Matt Riddell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] help on receive text


someshwarak wrote:
 Hi * users,

 I am only seeing SendText in the available asterisk applications. But I
have
 not seen Receive Text application. I tried on asterisk-1.0.7 and 1.0.9.
Can
 anyone tell me how to use this receive text command.

The only one that currently exists is the agi command RECEIVE TEXT.

 I want to use receivetext command and get text information from an
softphone
 so that that can be routed to some other phone supporting text message.
(my
 soft phones are SIP/IAX based).

You're going to have to write an AGI for it.

 where I can get the receive text application for asterisk?

You'll find it in the latest CVS HEAD.  But it's agi, not an application.

pabx*CLI show agi receive text
Usage: RECEIVE TEXT timeout
Receives a string of text on a channel. Specify timeout to be the
maximum time to wait for input in milliseconds, or 0 for infinite. Most
channels do not support the reception of text. Returns -1 for failure or
1 for success, and the string in parentheses.


--
Cheers,

Matt Riddell
___

http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE405P / TE410P with 2nd generation firmware field upgradable?

2005-08-12 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Friday 12 August 2005 09:30, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
 Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
  Unfortunately not.  It's a configuration PROM, not EEPROM or FLASH.  I am
  pretty sure that Digium has an upgrade program in place though.  It's
  best to contact them directly for these types of inquiries instead of the
  list.

 Actually, it is EEPROM, and will be upgradeable in the field once the
 card has 2nd gen firmware installed on it.

TE405 Rev A uses an XCF01S which by Xilinx own documentation says is a PROM.  
I haven't taken a close look at the TE405 Rev B.  :-)  

Of course, Xilinx could be outright lying and the're not PROM at all, or 
they're being pedantic and saying yes it's programmable, but it's also 
REprogrammable.

Either way I'll just shut up.  :-)

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax spandsp

2005-08-12 Thread Craig Guy
I've been using spandsp and rxfax to receive faxes for a while now and over 
the past few days I've looked into the other side of things - txfax.  I 
can't seem to get it working properly.  I've included debug logs below of 
both the tx and rx side of things.  I've tried three different servers, 
asterisk v1.0.6, 1.0.9 and CVS, FC2 and FC4, libtiff 3.5.7 and 3.7.1, TE405P 
and TE110P cards, connected to each other via crossover cable (with rxfax as 
a fax client), the TE405P connected to itself (ports one and two crossover 
cable), and also connected to the PSTN with a hardfax on the other end.  I 
always get the same errors.


Would be very grateful if someone could give me some pointers or otherwise 
shed some light.  The logs below are from spandsp 0.0.2 pre18 on CVS Head 
txfax talking to 0.0.2 pre18 on v1.0.9 stable rxfax.  Doesn't matter though 
as the last debug entry is always the same (T4 timeout in state 4)



*  TXFAX Debug *

   -- Executing TxFAX(Zap/1-1, /tmp/11236686843.tif|caller|debug) in 
new stack

Slow carrier up
Urgent handler
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 DIS: 80 00 ce f4 80 80 81 80 80 80 18
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
 Prefer 256 octet blocks
 Can receive fax
 Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29
 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: Unlimited
 Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
 R8x15.4lines/mm
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
 North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
 North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)
DCS:
 Can receive fax
 Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: A4 (297mm)
 Minimum scan line time: 20ms
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Start sending document
Start tx document
Changed from phase 2 to 4

DCS: 83 00 86 80 80 80 00

HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 3
Slow carrier up
T4 timeout in state 4

* End of txfax debug *

* RXFAX debug *
Aug 12 11:00:12 DEBUG[11937]: pbx.c:1274 pbx_extension_helper: Launching 
'RxFAX'-- Executing RxFAX(Zap/1-1, 
/var/mbox/msgs/1123815612.2.tif|debug) in new stack

Urgent handler
Aug 12 11:00:12 DEBUG[11937]: channel.c:1752 ast_set_read_format: Set 
channel Zap/1-1 to read format slin
Aug 12 11:00:12 DEBUG[11937]: channel.c:1719 ast_set_write_format: Set 
channel Zap/1-1 to write format slin

Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Aug 12 11:00:12 DEBUG[11937]: chan_zap.c:4138 my_zt_write: Write returned -1 
(Resource temporarily unavailable) on channel 1

Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Changed from phase 1 to 4
DIS:
 Prefer 256 octet blocks
 Can receive fax
 Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29
 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: Unlimited
 Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
 R8x15.4lines/mm
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
 North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
 North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)

DIS: 80 00 ce f4 80 80 81 80 80 80 18
Aug 12 11:00:16 DEBUG[11937]: chan_zap.c:4053 zt_read: DTMF digit: f on 
Zap/1-1

Aug 12 11:00:16 DEBUG[11937]: chan_zap.c:4095 zt_read: Fax already handled
HDLC underflow in state 9
Changed from phase 4 to 3
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 DCS: 83 00 86 80 80 80 00
DCS with final frame tag
In state 9
DCS:
 Can receive fax
 Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: A4 (297mm)
 Minimum scan line time: 20ms
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Get at 9600bps, modem 1
Changed from phase 3 to 5
Fast carrier up
Fast carrier down
Fast carrier up
Coarse carrier frequency 1699.90 (68)
Training error 0.294910
Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 0.636352)
Fast carrier trained


Craig 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie Question: Building anAsterisk systemtoreplace an old PBX but using existing phone

2005-08-12 Thread Jonathan k. Creasy
It would be nice if there was a dialplan for each registration or
line, which would allow me to never press send for any of the systems I
register to


On my Sipura there isI haven't checked one of the polycoms but I
suspect they are no different. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
Goryachev
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 8:59 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie Question: Building anAsterisk
systemtoreplace an old PBX but using existing phone


 Jonathan k. Creasy wrote:
  YeahI think that every install I have done the first thing that
  happens is why is there a delay before the call connects? and the
  answer is you have to hit dial or wait 10 seconds. 
 
 What all phones does that apply to? I'm fairly certain it applies to
the
 
 Polycom phones I've read about, but I'm not sure about others. I'm 
 obviously a newbie to the field as well (well, at least to the
physical 
 phones).

Actually, I never need to press send when dialling numbers from my
polycom phone... well, actually I do, but 99% of people wouldn't... I'll
explain:

My sip phone registers to different SIP servers (all asterisk), and each
server has it's own dialplan, ie, one is purely PSTN calls, and so there
is no leading digit for 'external calls', you just dial the number. One
is a PBX where you need to dial 9 to get an outside line, with 3 digit
extensions. Another is a PBX where you need to dial 0 to get an outside
line, with 4 digit extensions. Also, each PBX system has different
voicemail numbers to get to voicemailmain etc...

So, I don't press send when dialling through my own PBX, but I do if I
am dialling through one of the other systems, since their dialplans are
not catered for in my polycom.

BTW, it would be nice if there was a dialplan for each registration or
line, which would allow me to never press send for any of the systems I
register to:)

Regards,
Adam


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Peter Svensson
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Geoff Manning wrote:

 OK. So I changed it to:
 
 span=1,0,0,d4,ami
 
 And the Blue Alarms are still occurring but now in conjunction with Slip
 errors. I feel like I am on the right track though.

Which side shows the slips?

I am not that familiar with T1, Are you sure the signalling between the 
pbx and asterisk is set the same on both?

Peter


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP301 and 501 with asterisk...

2005-08-12 Thread Jonathan k. Creasy
Our vendor told us we can't buy the 841's anymoreanyone else have
this problem or have a vendor that is still selling them?

-Jonathan

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex
Ternero
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 9:44 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP301 and 501 with asterisk...

Hi

I work with Sipura 841, and works very well, after make a firmware
update.


Alex

-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Trevor
Peirce
Enviado el: jueves, 11 de agosto de 2005 18:56
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Asunto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP301 and 501 with asterisk...


Ing. Marlo R. Beltran G wrote:

 Hi,

  

 I am about to buy ip pbx asterisk system but what ip phones do you 
 recommend? Are polycom ip all functional with the ip pbx system???

  

We just got a Polycom IP501 for testing and have thus far been 
unsuccessful at getting it to regiser with asterisk.  Outgoing cals work

fine now (with authentication; verified with ethereal).


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Possibly bad FXS module in TDM400P?

2005-08-12 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:46:45AM -0400, Jeff Borders wrote:
 I've got the latest zaptel and cvs asterisk software loaded on my phone 
 server running FC3.  And yes, It's fully updated and udev is setup 
 correctly.  I've got a TDM400P with one FXS and one FXO module 
 installed.  When I load zaptel and wctdm and run ztcfg -vvv, I get this:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ztcfg -vvv
 ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6)

ztcfg failed to actually perform the ioctl-s on the devices. Is the
module loaded?

  lsmod | grep zaptel
  ls -l /proc/zaptel/*

 
 Zaptel Configuration
 ==
 
 
 Channel map:
 
 Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01)
 Channel 02: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 02)
 
 2 channels configured.

This is the output from? doesn't ztcfg givr the error above?

 
 Regardless of my configuration, it should show up in ztcfg, right? 

ztcfg first reprorts (when verbose enough) the channels/spans configured in 
zaptel.conf and only then opens device files.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |   | a Mutt's  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   |  best
ICQ# 16849755 |   | friend
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] 7960 + 7914 Problems

2005-08-12 Thread Craig Bruenderman
I'm still having problems getting this to work. I cannot get anything to
display on my 7914 other than blank lines.

I have SIP/5920-5930 in [main] that I'd like to add to the 7914 and
indicate hook status. The 7960 is registering okay as SCCP/5000.

What exactly should my sccp.conf file look like? When I make changes to
this, how do I enact them? Do I reload Asterisk and reboot the phone or
do I have to restart Asterisk and reboot the phone?

Right now, this is how sccp.conf looks.



[general]
keepalive = 5
context = main
dateFormat = D-M-Y  ; M-D-Y in any order (5 chars max)
bindaddr = 192.168.1.10 ; replace 1.2.3.4 with the ip address of the
port = 2000; listen on port 2000 (Skinny, default)

[SEP00036B75B542]
type= 7914
autologin   = ,,79140,79141
speeddial   = 5929,Craig B,5929 at main

[martha]
id  = 5000
pin =
label   = Martha
context = main
callwaiting = 1
mailbox = 5000

; Another line.
[79140]
id  = 5929
pin =
label   = Craig
context = main

[79141]
id  = 5933
pin =
label   = Andy
context = main


Message: 4
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 14:53:39 -0400
From: Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7914
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain

On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 14:09 -0400, Craig Bruenderman wrote:
 How does one go about programming a Cisco 7914 sidecar to be used as a

 busy lamp field?
 

In the sccp.conf file, 

o As a Line:
 You can assign a line to the button/lamp which is really neat.
The lamp is green when you are on the line, blinking green when you put
the line on hold, blinks orange when you call that line.
If you had a 7960 and wanted a line on the 7914 you could do it this
way: 
 autologin = ,,79140,79141 ; This makes it go to the 7th button 
   ; for the first line button.



o As a speed dial (lamp is either off or red)  You setup a speed dial
like this:
speeddial = 10,John Doe,[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 And then to make this work you need to have the  exten =
10,hint,SCCP/10 ;sccp phone  exten = 10,hint,SIP/10  ;Sip phone

As a line you don't need the hint.

Note: a speed dial with hint shows an icon of a phone just like a line.
And when the lamp is on with the hint, it shows an icon of a phone with
an X though it. This is the case with the 7940/7960 speed dials as well.

The icon gives you the same line status as the lamps even without the
7914 sidecar.


Craig Bruenderman
Network Advocates, Inc.
300 Envoy Circle
Suite 300
Louisville, KY  40299

Main:  502-412-1050
DID:   502-992-5929
Fax:   502-412-1058
Mobile:  502-548-1100

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Firewall will definately increase jitters inyourvoice conversation

2005-08-12 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:58:09PM -0600, Rich Adamson wrote:
 That's a crack of crap sold by the marketing (not sales) people selling
 firewalls. If you know what you're doing, one can very easily secure any
 linux system to function on the Internet (etc) without a firewall. It all
 depends on your level of knowledge/skills on how to disable those items
 that are not really needed in your environment. Start with a 'netstat -a'
 to identify those ports that are listening, and shut those items down that
 you don't want exposed.

  netstat -lutp

is more efficient than a simple netstat -a. RTFM netstat.

You could also write your own iptables script and optimize it for low
latency. In fact, I bet there are enough such scripts rolling around the
'net. Even I wrote one.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |   | a Mutt's  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   |  best
ICQ# 16849755 |   | friend
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE405P V2 changes?

2005-08-12 Thread Kib Eki

yes, fedora 3 but without any changes at the sources

Master Abi wrote:
Are you using Redhat/Fedora? If I remember those init scripts is for 
Redhat/Fedora. I am using gentoo.


Did you make any modifications to wct4xxp.c. or pass any parameters to 
zaptel. I see there is a #define SUPPORT_GEN1 in to wct4xxp.c which I 
commented out, but it made no difference. ztcfg seems to where the 
channels become unassigned.


Thanks again.

Kib Eki wrote:


Hi,
we also got one V2 TE405P card. It works fine now. At the moment we 
use for bridging the Pri to our old PBX.
You must use zaptel, libri and asterisk v 1.0.8 or higher. We use 
1.0.9 at the moment.

zaptel:
after make; make install i also executed make config. This copies the 
correct startup script to /etc/init.d/zaptel. Without this it also 
didn't worked for me.




Master Abi wrote:


Hi

I got the 2nd Gen firmware upgraded on the TE405P.  I recompiled 
after putting in the upgraded board but did not change any conf, but 
the spans become active but will not come up.


I guess I am missing something or are the any changes to the 
zaptel/libpri software that is required. I cannot find any info about 
this or does this new firmware only work with latest CVS. I am using 
1.0.9 with 2.6.12 kernel


Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196
Found TE4XXP at base address fdfff000, remapped to f8928000
TE4XXP version c01a0164, burst ON, slip debug: OFF
TE4XXP running with work queues.
FALC version: 0005, Board ID: 00
Reg 0: 0x364e9400
Reg 1: 0x364e9000
Reg 2: 0x
Reg 3: 0x
Reg 4: 0x0001
Reg 5: 0x
Reg 6: 0xc01a0164
Reg 7: 0x1f00
Reg 8: 0x
Reg 9: 0x00ff
Reg 10: 0x
TE4XXP: Launching card: 0
TE4XXP: Setting up global serial parameters
Found a Wildcard: Wildcard TE405P (2nd Gen)
eth0: link up, 10Mbps, half-duplex, lpa 0x
About to enter spanconfig!
Done with spanconfig!
About to enter spanconfig!
Done with spanconfig!
Unassigning channel 0/1!
Unassigning channel 0/2!
Unassigning channel 0/3!
Unassigning channel 0/4!
Unassigning channel 0/5!
Unassigning channel 0/6!
Unassigning channel 0/7!
Unassigning channel 0/8!
Unassigning channel 0/9!
Unassigning channel 0/10!
Unassigning channel 0/11!
Unassigning channel 0/12!
Unassigning channel 0/13!
Unassigning channel 0/14!
Unassigning channel 0/15!
Unassigning channel 0/16!
Unassigning channel 0/17!
Unassigning channel 0/18!
etc...

This was working for 10 months before the upgrade.

Master


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Festival Problem

2005-08-12 Thread Michael Welter
I'm attempting to use Festival with Asterisk on an x86_64 system.  This 
IVR application works ok on a P4 system.


I'm using the FC3 x86_64 distro on a single processor Opteron system. 
Festival by itself (using the command line and speakers) seems to work 
ok, and Asterisk without Festival works ok.  When the Asterisk dialplan 
calls Festival, however, Festival reports a disconnect and Asterisk's 
Festival command does not complete. Later, when I shut down the system 
for reboot, I get a kernel panic.


I've tried both the FC4 Festival rpm as well as the source download from 
festvox.org.  I modify the siteinit.scm file as per the wiki page, and I 
use the stock festival.conf file in Asterisk.


Has anyone experienced this behavior, and is there a workaround?

Thanks,



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Voipjet experiment

2005-08-12 Thread Garth Summey

Hi List,

I'm wondering if someone who uses VoipJet as their termination service 
would do me a favor.


If I call the American Airlines reservation number (1-800-433-7300), the 
call gets connected, but after 30 seconds asterisk drops the call 
responding that no one answered.


I'm using areskicc2 (calling card app) as an authentication system and I 
don't know if that is what is causing the problem, or if VoipJet doesn't 
sense the line was picked up (and thus doesn't pass this info to me).


Here is a sample output of CLI when the disconnect happens:

---
-- Called voipjet/18004337300
-- Call accepted by 216.118.117.46 (format ulaw)
-- Format for call is ulaw
-- IAX2/voipjet-1 is making progress passing it to SIP/541-d994
-- Nobody picked up in 3 ms
-- Hungup 'IAX2/voipjet-1'
---

During the 3 ms I hear the American Airlines auto attendant giving 
me options, I can choose and option and the auto attendant will 
recognize the DTMF and send me to that menu, then after a total of 30 
seconds, I get disconnected.


I haven't had this issue with any other numbers yet (only been in 
production use one day...)


Any info is appreciated.

G
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Sendmail question

2005-08-12 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 07:09:45PM +1000, Rudolf Ladyzhenskii wrote:

 I want voicemails to be delivered to recepients by e-mail. I have set up 
 voicenail, and I can see asterisk is using sendmail to send messages out.

[snip]

 I got a book on sendmail and it looks quite complex. 

Right. Asterisk needs a sendmail. A program that provides basically
the same command-line interface sendmail provides for sending messages.

There are currently many of those. Fedora includes not only Sendmail,
but Postfix as well. I personally find Postfix much sainer than
Sendmail.

Furthermore, what you basically want is a rather simple setup: relay all
local messages through a certain SMTP server to some remote locations.
There a number of programs, such as ssmtp and nullmailer, that do
exactly that, without keeping a local queue at all.

(Their error handling is problematic: network errors may mean lost
messages: they don't queue. But then again, they're much simpler.)

So in short: you have a whole range of programs that provide a
sendmil. Not necessarily the complex Sendmail your book was written
about.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |   | a Mutt's  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   |  best
ICQ# 16849755 |   | friend
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Ang: [Asterisk-Users] Voipjet experiment

2005-08-12 Thread Gunnar Andersson
Hej!

Jag är på semester vecka 33, åter igen på kontoret 22 aug

mvh

Gunnar / JMG
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Geoff Manning
Peter Svensson wrote:
 Which side shows the slips?

The slips are seen on the legacy PBX side (Isoetec 228)

 I am not that familiar with T1, Are you sure the signalling between
 the pbx and asterisk is set the same on both?
 

Unfortunately I am not aware of the signalling set on the Isoetec side.
Nothing in the console menu's allows me to see it and the tech said he was
unsure. Not a good answer. I have tried several signalling settings to no
avail.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Weird issues with TDM400P

2005-08-12 Thread Jeremy Gault
We have a TDM400P installed here with four FXS modules.  It works well 
except for a couple of issues:


First, I have a Panasonic KX-TG2431 telephone (so others can reach me 
when I am in o ther parts of the building) hooked up to one of the FXS 
ports.  When the other end hangs up, I get the usual CPC disconnect 
signal.  After the CPC, sometimes it will go to a dialtone, and other 
times a reorder.  There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason behind 
what it does, it's random.  That in and of itself is not a problem, but 
it did seem odd.  However, sometimes during the reorder (after about 3 
seconds) the reorder stops and I get an FSK data burst (assumedly the 
VMWI.)  My understanding is that the data burst isn't supposed to happen 
until *after* my phone goes on-hook.  Any idea what's up here?


Second, one of our ports has static on it.  A tenant moved in and we 
configured their fax for our fourth (until then unused) FXS port.  They 
had numerous fax problems, and when I connected a buttset up to their 
wall jack, there were minor static issues.  I swapped their fax 
connection to a different port on the TDM400P, and the static went 
away.  I put a different line (to elsewhere in the building) into their 
usual fax port on the TDM400P, and the static showed up there.  So, the 
problem follows the FXS port, and not the line itself.  For now, I have 
given them the FXS port I was using for my Panasonic, and put my 
Panasonic on the noisy port.  It's not all that noticeable, but of 
course the fax doesn't like any noise at all.  Any idea what this could 
be?  I haven't done much troubleshooting yet, but I plan on taking down 
the * box and re-seating the FXS module.  If that doesn't work, I'll 
swap it and another FXS module on the board around to see if the problem 
follows the module or the socket.  Other than that, any recommendations?


Third (minor) issue, which affects all the ports, but I am using my 
phone as an example: I can call from my desk phone (Polycom IP 501) to 
my analog phone and answer.  Then I can hit flash on the analog phone, 
and I'll hear the usual double-click on the Polycom as the analog phone 
flashes.  However, between those two clicks, there's some sort of weird 
noise.  It's not a radio station or anything.  It's more like a whine of 
sorts.  The same noise can be heard by hooking up a buttset to one of 
the ports and putting it in monitor mode (where it monitors the line, 
but doesn't go offhook.)  Is it normal for Digium cards to generate this 
noise, or does this indicate something is wrong with my card?  (Our 
Comdial PBX at church does a similar type of thing when flashing on an 
analog extension, but that still doesn't tell me if it's normal or 
not.)  Anyone else see this same type of thing?


Fourth: I get this message in the log (related to our analog FXS ports)
Aug 11 16:46:17 WARNING[23855]: zt hook failed: Device or resource busy

I think this may have something to do with getting a dialtone instead of 
reorder after hangup (the first thing I mentioned.)  Not 100% sure though.


Anyone have any ideas on any of these?  If you can share I'd appreciate 
it.  TIA.


 Jeremy

--
Jeremy Gault[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator, WinWorld Corporation
voice: +1.423.473.8084  fax: +1.423.472.9465
fwd: 461771 url: http://www.winworld.cc/

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] PC for 8 line system

2005-08-12 Thread Chris Gamble
I have 2 TDM04b cards currently running in an asterisk at home box that I am 
ready to replace with the CVS version of asterisk. What I am looking for is 
thoughts / recommendations. I want to move this to a small form factor ( 
shuttle ) machine and was wandering what expeience / advice there was for this? 
I have seen the incompatible motherboard list at digium ( and in fact I think 
my current machine is on the list ! ), but wanted to know what others are doing 
for small form factor tdm setups?

Thanks,
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voipjet experiment

2005-08-12 Thread Tim Pushor
Interesting. Something similar for me, except it comes back as busy 
after about 30 seconds.


   -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/18004337300
   -- Call accepted by 69.25.60.30 (format ulaw)
   -- Format for call is ulaw
   -- IAX2/voipjet-1 is making progress passing it to SIP/207-b8f3
   -- IAX2/voipjet-1 is making progress passing it to SIP/207-b8f3
   -- IAX2/voipjet-1 is busy
   -- Hungup 'IAX2/voipjet-1'

I wonder if American Airlines forgot an Answer in their dialplan ;-)

Tim

Garth Summey wrote:


Hi List,

I'm wondering if someone who uses VoipJet as their termination service 
would do me a favor.


If I call the American Airlines reservation number (1-800-433-7300), 
the call gets connected, but after 30 seconds asterisk drops the call 
responding that no one answered.


I'm using areskicc2 (calling card app) as an authentication system and 
I don't know if that is what is causing the problem, or if VoipJet 
doesn't sense the line was picked up (and thus doesn't pass this info 
to me).


Here is a sample output of CLI when the disconnect happens:

---
-- Called voipjet/18004337300
-- Call accepted by 216.118.117.46 (format ulaw)
-- Format for call is ulaw
-- IAX2/voipjet-1 is making progress passing it to SIP/541-d994
-- Nobody picked up in 3 ms
-- Hungup 'IAX2/voipjet-1'
---

During the 3 ms I hear the American Airlines auto attendant giving 
me options, I can choose and option and the auto attendant will 
recognize the DTMF and send me to that menu, then after a total of 30 
seconds, I get disconnected.


I haven't had this issue with any other numbers yet (only been in 
production use one day...)


Any info is appreciated.

G
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Voipjet experiment

2005-08-12 Thread Brian C. Fertig
I get the same problem @ home when I use it.  I thought it was just me.

..o---o.
Brian Fertig
NOC/Network Engineer
Planet Telecom, Inc.
Tampa, FL Office



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Garth
Summey
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 10:58 AM
To: Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Voipjet experiment

Hi List,

I'm wondering if someone who uses VoipJet as their termination service 
would do me a favor.

If I call the American Airlines reservation number (1-800-433-7300), the

call gets connected, but after 30 seconds asterisk drops the call 
responding that no one answered.

I'm using areskicc2 (calling card app) as an authentication system and I

don't know if that is what is causing the problem, or if VoipJet doesn't

sense the line was picked up (and thus doesn't pass this info to me).

Here is a sample output of CLI when the disconnect happens:

---
 -- Called voipjet/18004337300
 -- Call accepted by 216.118.117.46 (format ulaw)
 -- Format for call is ulaw
 -- IAX2/voipjet-1 is making progress passing it to SIP/541-d994
 -- Nobody picked up in 3 ms
 -- Hungup 'IAX2/voipjet-1'
---

During the 3 ms I hear the American Airlines auto attendant giving 
me options, I can choose and option and the auto attendant will 
recognize the DTMF and send me to that menu, then after a total of 30 
seconds, I get disconnected.

I haven't had this issue with any other numbers yet (only been in 
production use one day...)

Any info is appreciated.

G
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


This email was scanned by:  Mcafee GroupShield
 CONFIDENTIAL DISCLAMER 
All information provided in this email is considered confidential
and proprietary of Planet Telecom, Inc. and Telecenter Inc.
Use of this information by anyone other than the recipient or 
sender will be considered in breach of agreement.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] sip problem

2005-08-12 Thread wassim darwish
i have configured a sip phone to make calls through a
sip server but when i make call through the sip phone
to the sip server every thing goes well and the call
is  done perfectly but on sip server it gives me these
messages(i have 2 pc with different ips one with a sip
phone and the another with an asterisk ):

Aug 12 18:19:11 NOTICE[12149]: chan_sip.c:5284
register_verify: Peer 'wassim' is trying to register,
but not configured as host=dynamic
Aug 12 18:19:11 NOTICE[12149]: chan_sip.c:8730
handle_request_register: Registration from
'sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' failed for
'195.112.214.98'
Aug 12 18:19:11 WARNING[12149]: chan_sip.c:7910
handle_response: Forbidden - wrong password on
authentication for REGISTER for 'wassim' to
'195.112.214.98'
Aug 12 18:19:31 NOTICE[12149]: chan_sip.c:4380
sip_reg_timeout:-- Registration for
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' timed out, trying again

any body have an idea.


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Weird issues with TDM400P

2005-08-12 Thread John Novack



Jeremy Gault wrote:

We have a TDM400P installed here with four FXS modules.  It works well 
except for a couple of issues:



snip



Second, one of our ports has static on it.  A tenant moved in and we 
configured their fax for our fourth (until then unused) FXS port. 


Confirm it is the module and not the TDM base card by swapping modules 
and see if the static follows the module, then RAM the module from 
Digium, assume you can convince them there is a problem.

snip

However, between those two clicks, there's some sort of weird noise.  
It's not a radio station or anything.  It's more like a whine of sorts. 


That seems to be a problem in the FXS modules.
I have two configured as Ground Start ( which Digium says they don't 
support ) and when in an idle condition, there is that noise that I 
presume is some data the module is leaking through.
As long as you have a clean talk path  I wouldn't be concerned with this 
minor flaw.


Good luck with the rest

John Novack

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Comedian annoucment files

2005-08-12 Thread kurt x
  A user  has their unavailable message played and once that message
is over the Comedian
message is played right after.  Is there any way to prevent the
Comedian message being
played if the user's unavailable/busy message is being played.

Thanks,

Kurt
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] real-time priority , -p switch

2005-08-12 Thread Joseph
On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 08:26 +0200, Peter Svensson wrote:
  Since Linux is not RTOS, why some folks are using this -p switch?
  It has no effect on standard Linux box.
 
 Linux is not a hard realtime os with guaranteed timing. What the -p
 flag 
 does is to request the realtime scheduler. This means a process wil
 no 
 longer be subjected to the stanadrd unix scheduling but rather use a 
 strict priority scheduling. The net result is that once a process
 using 
 the realtime scheduler is ready to run the kernel wihh schedule it as
 soon 
 as possible. It will only be preempted by realtime processes of the
 same 
 or better priority.
 
 With the addition of the lowlatency patches the worst case latency
 for 
 userspace applications is very low. The remaining difference between
 a 
 hard RT os is the guarantees it can make.
 
 Peter

Thanks for the explanation, it makes sense now.
Though is the way to verify that asterisk is running with -p switch?
I've modified the startup script to start asterisk with -p; however
asterisk starts several sub-precess-ID's.  Do the sup-process-ID's are
effected by the -p switch?

I run  schedtool (12189 is asterisk PID with -p switch) and it shows:
schedtool 12189
PID 12189: PRIO   0, POLICY N: SCHED_NORMAL, NICE -15, AFFINITY 0x1

I run  schedtool (27421 is asterisk PID without -p switch) and it shows:
schedtool 27421
PID 27421: PRIO   0, POLICY N: SCHED_NORMAL, NICE -15, AFFINITY 0x1

I can verify that nice has taken effect but PRIO shows in both cases
0

-- 
#Joseph
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] USB handset wanted

2005-08-12 Thread Bill McCready \(PCPhoneline.com\)



Give me a handset with a ringer and hook that both work under Linux and
I will buy 30 pieces on the spot!
No kidding..


RESPONSE:  We are working on it and want to make sure we have the product 
definition correct to best serve the Linux community.   Please private 
e-mail me to clarify if your first target application is the Asterisk PBX so 
there is no misunderstanding regarding your basic requirements.   Thanks !!!


Best regards...Bill


Bill McCready (PCPhoneline.com) wrote:

We are planning to develop versions of our USB based phone and gateway 
products for Linux.  The plan is to make them will work like regular 
phones exactly like our Windows versions do including physically ringing 
loudly on incoming calls.


Which versions of Linux are the most popular at the moment in the 
workplace so we can decide which one to focus our energies on first?


Best regards,


Bill McCready
PCPhoneline.com

- Original Message - From: Matt Riddell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] USB handset wanted



Ondrej Valousek wrote:


Matt,

You have forgotten the ringer.
In fact, I don't care that much about LCD  buttons. I want to use it 
with something like X-lite.
Initially, I used machine builtin soundcard with X-Lite (worked well) 
but then I realized that if the phone is supposed to compete with the 
standard analog phone, it must have a working ringer.



Fair enough.

 From what I see I suppose that every handset with builtin ringer must 
be recongized to the OS as 2 USB soundcards - one for speaker/mike, the 
second as a ringer.



The ones I have worked with have a seperate ringer that just takes an 
int to decide which ringtone to play.  I.E. it is not shown as a 
soundcard.


--
Cheers,

Matt Riddell
___

http://www.sineapps.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.sineapps.com/rssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Voipjet experiment

2005-08-12 Thread Eric Knudson
I seem to remember (calling over isdn) that American Airlines doesn't
actually send back a Connect for quite awhile - there's just a
-Progress w/in-band info to cause voice cut-through. Or something
like that ;)



On 8/12/05, Brian C. Fertig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I get the same problem @ home when I use it.  I thought it was just me.
 
 ..o---o.
 Brian Fertig
 NOC/Network Engineer
 Planet Telecom, Inc.
 Tampa, FL Office
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Garth
 Summey
 Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 10:58 AM
 To: Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Voipjet experiment
 
 Hi List,
 
 I'm wondering if someone who uses VoipJet as their termination service
 would do me a favor.
 
 If I call the American Airlines reservation number (1-800-433-7300), the
 
 call gets connected, but after 30 seconds asterisk drops the call
 responding that no one answered.
 
 I'm using areskicc2 (calling card app) as an authentication system and I
 
 don't know if that is what is causing the problem, or if VoipJet doesn't
 
 sense the line was picked up (and thus doesn't pass this info to me).
 
 Here is a sample output of CLI when the disconnect happens:
 
 ---
  -- Called voipjet/18004337300
  -- Call accepted by 216.118.117.46 (format ulaw)
  -- Format for call is ulaw
  -- IAX2/voipjet-1 is making progress passing it to SIP/541-d994
  -- Nobody picked up in 3 ms
  -- Hungup 'IAX2/voipjet-1'
 ---
 
 During the 3 ms I hear the American Airlines auto attendant giving
 me options, I can choose and option and the auto attendant will
 recognize the DTMF and send me to that menu, then after a total of 30
 seconds, I get disconnected.
 
 I haven't had this issue with any other numbers yet (only been in
 production use one day...)
 
 Any info is appreciated.
 
 G
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 This email was scanned by:  Mcafee GroupShield
  CONFIDENTIAL DISCLAMER 
 All information provided in this email is considered confidential
 and proprietary of Planet Telecom, Inc. and Telecenter Inc.
 Use of this information by anyone other than the recipient or
 sender will be considered in breach of agreement.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Forwarding behavior question

2005-08-12 Thread Craig Bruenderman
We use Polycom 501s here and several users utilize the Forward
soft-button to forward their extension to another extension or outside
to a cell phone when they are out. My question is, how can I configure
the dial plan so that if they have forwarded their extension via the
phone, and the extension they forwarded to does not answer, return them
to the voicemail of the originally dialed extension.

E.g.

Dial Tom - tom's extension forwarded to Betsy - Betsy's phone rings
but she does not answer - return to Tom's voicemail instead of Betsy's.

Craig Bruenderman
Network Advocates, Inc.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP500 / Registration Question?

2005-08-12 Thread Kenny Kant
Hello again,


I have a bunch of Polycom IP500 Phones with Boot 2.6.2
and SIP 1.4.1.  I have defined seperate user and peer
settings for my extensions as per posts I have seen in
here.  I can access voicemail...etc and the phone seem
work fine.

Question: when I do sip show registration there is
nothing listed and/or sip show subscriptions nothing
is there.  But when I do sip show peers I see a list
of my phones, same for sip show users. Shouldnt I
see my phones as registered or something similar
under these two sections? I have them set to register,
and like I said they are working fine.

Any help?

Thanks,

Kenny





__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. 
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] three questions

2005-08-12 Thread Timur Sattarov

Hello All,

I just started to use asterisk with Digium card (4 fxo ports)
and I've met some problems ( I'm just new in asterisk so questions may 
be stupid )

my environment:
Debian testing,
asterisk 1.0.9
zaptel-1.0.9
TDM04P

1) when asterisk receiving incoming call on TDM card all networking 
cards stops to send or receive any data for some time
nothing suspicious in the log files, nothing in dmesg ( even with 
highest level of logging)
I was suspected shared interrupts - but ethernet and tdm cards are using 
different ones

any ideas ?

2) does someone has simple example config files for  using asterisk as a 
gateway between SIP/internal extensions  and PSTN ?


3) I've set up fax receiving and sending it to email

[fax]
exten = 1,1,Macro(faxreceive)
exten = h,1,System(/var/lib/asterisk/mailfax ${CALLERIDNUM} 
${CALLEDFAX} ${EXTNAME} ${EXTMAIL} ${FAXFILE} ${EXTCOMPANY})


but CALLERIDNUM always empty

any suggestions ?

P.S. I'm not expecting answers with full sescriptions if my questoins 
are already answered - just give me the link to this page.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Geoff Manning
Peter Svensson wrote:

 I am not that familiar with T1, Are you sure the signalling between
 the pbx and asterisk is set the same on both?
 

I have unearthed some documentation on the programming side of the legacy
PBX. I can set the following on the PBX for each line on the T1 card:

Line Type:

0   immediate return on signalling
1*  wink start, return supervision on answer
2   wink start, return supervision on ring
3   return supervision on answer
4   return supervision on ring

I have tried all of those setting and nothing seemed to have any affect. But
I feel those settings in conjunction with some settings in zaptel/zapata
conf files may help. I am going to try some out, any ideas are welcome!

* It is currently set at 1
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Bruce Ferrell

Geoff Manning wrote:

Peter Svensson wrote:



I am not that familiar with T1, Are you sure the signalling between
the pbx and asterisk is set the same on both?




I have unearthed some documentation on the programming side of the legacy
PBX. I can set the following on the PBX for each line on the T1 card:

Line Type:

0   immediate return on signalling
1*  wink start, return supervision on answer
2   wink start, return supervision on ring
3   return supervision on answer
4   return supervision on ring

I have tried all of those setting and nothing seemed to have any affect. But
I feel those settings in conjunction with some settings in zaptel/zapata
conf files may help. I am going to try some out, any ideas are welcome!

* It is currently set at 1


Those options are all related to per circuit call signaling.  blue 
alarms refer to timing errors on the T1  i.e. timing loss such that an 
entire frame is either dropped or repeated.


You need to be looking at a lower level

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Geoff Manning
Bruce Ferrell wrote:

 You need to be looking at a lower level

Like hw/cabling errors?? If so, that's what I was afraid of for cost
reasons.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Bruce Ferrell

Geoff Manning wrote:

Bruce Ferrell wrote:



You need to be looking at a lower level



Like hw/cabling errors?? If so, that's what I was afraid of for cost
reasons.


Hardware, possible.  Unlikely to be cabling.  It's usually a timing setting.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Jon Pounder

 Bruce Ferrell wrote:

 You need to be looking at a lower level

 Like hw/cabling errors?? If so, that's what I was afraid of for cost
 reasons.

no - the stuff you found relates to configuring one 64k channel of the T1,
you need to find the settings to configure the overall t1.

- someone mentioned the encoding settings - its not that or you would be
getting more than just a blue alarm, it would not be working period.

- you need to look for clock source settings, and set those.

have your asterisk t1 card generate the clock on the asterisk TX side for
sure. it sounds like the pbx just generates its own tx clock based on the
rx data which is what you want (that might be faulty who knows). if it can
generate its own tx clock from a crystal try that instead and see if it
helps.






 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Jon Pounder

   _/_/_/  _/_/  _/   _/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/
_/_/_/  _/  _/ _/_/_/  _/  _/_/
   _/_/  _/_/  _/ _/_/  _/_/  _/
_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/


Inline Internet Systems Inc.
Thorold, Ontario, Canada

Tools to Power Your e-Business Solutions
www.inline.net
www.ihtml.com
www.ihtmlmerchant.com
www.opayc.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Jon Pounder

 Geoff Manning wrote:
 Bruce Ferrell wrote:


You need to be looking at a lower level


 Like hw/cabling errors?? If so, that's what I was afraid of for cost
 reasons.

just out of curiousity - what are you paying for a T1 cable that you are
worried about cost ? you do realize any old ethernet cable will work right
? we are only talking about 1/8th to 1/80th of the speed.




 Hardware, possible.  Unlikely to be cabling.  It's usually a timing
 setting.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Jon Pounder

   _/_/_/  _/_/  _/   _/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/
_/_/_/  _/  _/ _/_/_/  _/  _/_/
   _/_/  _/_/  _/ _/_/  _/_/  _/
_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/


Inline Internet Systems Inc.
Thorold, Ontario, Canada

Tools to Power Your e-Business Solutions
www.inline.net
www.ihtml.com
www.ihtmlmerchant.com
www.opayc.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Comedian annoucment files

2005-08-12 Thread Bryce Chidester
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+CMD+voicemail

On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 11:37 -0400, kurt x wrote:
   A user  has their unavailable message played and once that message
 is over the Comedian
 message is played right after.  Is there any way to prevent the
 Comedian message being
 played if the user's unavailable/busy message is being played.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Kurt
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] How to fix a Blue Alarm?? Line Noise?

2005-08-12 Thread Geoff Manning
Jon Pounder wrote:
 Geoff Manning wrote:
 Bruce Ferrell wrote:
 
 
 You need to be looking at a lower level
 
 
 Like hw/cabling errors?? If so, that's what I was afraid of for cost
 reasons.
 
 just out of curiousity - what are you paying for a T1 cable that you
 are worried about cost ? you do realize any old ethernet cable will
 work right ? we are only talking about 1/8th to 1/80th of the speed.
 

 
What? Do you think nickels grow on trees? ;)

I was concerned more about the pricing of a T1 *card*, Cabling I'm not
concerned with.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >