Re: [Asterisk-Users] analog phone connects to zaptel fxoks is beeping
Check if there is any priority conflict between extensions in you outgoing context in extensions.conf:) Regards /Gurmi On 10/3/05, Michael Jia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a analog phone connect to a WCTDM card. It used to work fine. Now recently, after several conf change and power restart, it stops working. Whenever I pickup the phone, instead of hearing the dial tone, I hear a busing beeping tone, like a machine gun is firing. :) However, from asterisk console, I do see a a OffHook/OnHook message, but whatever I dial in the phone keypad seems not recognized by asterisk, and it doesn't print out any messages. What could cause the problem? Any clues? Highly appreciate your help. Michael ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IBM tts engine integration
Not bad.. but still not as good as Scansoft's... == Rod Bacon Empowered Communications Ground Floor, 102 York St. South Melbourne Victoria, Australia. 3205 Phone: +613 99401600Fax: +613 99401650 FWD: 512237 ICQ: 5662270 == Tom Lynn wrote: On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 00:53:03 -0700, you wrote: I wrote a very very simple shell script and an even simplier macro to use the IBM TTS engine within asterisk for prompts. While its free you are limited on the number of requests you can do within a day. If anyone is interested its available at http://www.0xdecafbad.com/Asterisk-Text-to-Speech.html Nice solution, but what will you do if/when IBM pulls their demonstration page? Hopefully, by then you will have cached all of the necessary recordings. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IBM tts engine integration
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 16:56 +1000, Rod Bacon wrote: Not bad.. but still not as good as Scansoft's... do you have a url for an online demo? IBM's was just something I found that was easy to integrate into asterisk free. If scansoft also has a demo then I may look at writing something else to use theirs. I checked their website but didnt see an online demo. I am not happy with the lower selection in voices with ibm, but its free, simple to use, and works without any markers saying its a demo. -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 Q
Thank you - while not directly an answer to my question, it directly addresses the root of my question, pointing me where I'll need to go to dig deeper. It also tells me what we didn't want to hear, that there's a very good possibility that we simply won't be able to ensure that the 911 call center can tell which unit a call comes from without verbal specification from the caller. j On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 08:13 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: Asterisk is more then capable of sending the appropriate callerid info to any remote site including 911 centers. However, there is a telco between asterisk and the 911 center that may not have realistic policies/systems to accept and forward that callerid. So, your objective becomes one of what the telco will allow you to do (and their support of your objective). As one example only, the telco might have a switch that does not have PRI capabilities (I know of many of these), but they provide ANI info to the 911 centers since that _might_ be the only data they can provide. If that were the case in your environment, it doesn't make any difference what you do with asterisk, it won't be supported. I know from practical experience that a telco's switch (in most cases) will accept calleridnum via a PRI, but on most central office switches its an option that needs to be turned on. (Local telco policy _might_ say they will never do that.) Once that option is turned on, you can send almost anything to them in the form of calleridnum. The callerid name is a different story. The central office switch that _terminates_ any call (including 911 calls) will have a mechanism to do a database lookup/dip, and if that database has not been populated with an appropriate callerid name, will not provide callerid names to the 911 center (or anyone else). That essentially says you can program asterisk to send anything that you want from a callerid name perspective and it will be ignored in the US. In very general terms, only telco personnal have the access to update the callerid database, and usually that is limited to the CO prefixes they support. Also keep in mind that not all 911 centers are the same from a technical perspective. They certainly accept callerid numbers, but they may have their own local database for names (etc), or, they may also do a database lookup from some distant database. If you think about those customers that subscribe to callerid blocking, cell phones gps, and the requirements of 911 centers, its not hard to visualize several different 911 implementation approaches. Talk to a knowledgable telco person (might be somewhat difficult to find the appropriate person), and talk to the 911 center manager to better understand what options you might have available. I'd start with the 911 manager as he will know a telco person that understands the technical requirements. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 Group dialing.... Is there something in the horizon?
Can you explain a little why you would want to do this? MarkOn 10/3/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since the search engine on voip-info.org is not working correctly with old links, etc..I was curious if there is some hidden talent in the IAX2 outbound dialing?What I'm asking about is:Dial(IAX2/g1/${EXTEN})Is there a way to set up groups like the above command using either SIP or IAX2 protocols like you can do with Zap?Thanks.___--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- regards,Mark P. EdwardsFWD: 667917 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] analog phone connects to zaptel fxoks is beeping
The problem happens way before asterisk is started. I hear the noisey tone right after zaptel drivers were loaded without even start asterisk. /sbin/modprobe wctdm /sbin/modprobe zaptel [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztcfg - Zaptel Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXO Loopstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04) 2 channels configured. I am assuming it is a zaptel problem instead of asterisk. BTW, channel 4 works fine. Thanks Michael On 10/2/05, Gurminder Arora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check if there is any priority conflict between extensions in yououtgoing context in extensions.conf:)Regards/GurmiOn 10/3/05, Michael Jia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,I have a analog phone connect to a WCTDM card.It used to work fine. Now recently, after several conf change and power restart,it stops working.Whenever I pickup the phone, instead of hearing the dial tone, I hear a busing beepingtone, like a machine gun is firing. :) However,from asterisk console, I do see a aOffHook/OnHook message, but whatever I dial in the phone keypad seems not recognized by asterisk, and it doesn't print out any messages.What could cause the problem? Any clues?Highly appreciate your help.Michael ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] analog phone connects to zaptel fxoks is beeping
Also, here is the output from /var/log/messages Oct 3 00:18:01 localhost kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Oct 3 00:18:01 localhost kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:09.0[A] - Link [LNKB] - GSI 10 (level, low) - IRQ 10 Oct 3 00:18:02 localhost kernel: Freshmaker version: 73 Oct 3 00:18:02 localhost kernel: Freshmaker passed register test Oct 3 00:18:02 localhost kernel: Module 0: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO Oct 3 00:18:02 localhost kernel: Module 1: Not installed Oct 3 00:18:02 localhost kernel: Module 2: Not installed Oct 3 00:18:02 localhost kernel: Module 3: Installed -- AUTO FXO (FCC mode) Oct 3 00:18:02 localhost kernel: Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV I (2 modules) Oct 3 00:18:03 localhost kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) Oct 3 00:18:41 localhost kernel: Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America) -MichaelOn 10/3/05, Michael Jia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem happens way before asterisk is started. I hear the noisey tone right after zaptel drivers were loaded without even start asterisk. /sbin/modprobe wctdm /sbin/modprobe zaptel [EMAIL PROTECTED] zaptel]# ./ztcfg - Zaptel Configuration == Channel map: Channel 01: FXO Loopstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04) 2 channels configured. I am assuming it is a zaptel problem instead of asterisk. BTW, channel 4 works fine. Thanks Michael On 10/2/05, Gurminder Arora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check if there is any priority conflict between extensions in yououtgoing context in extensions.conf:)Regards/GurmiOn 10/3/05, Michael Jia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,I have a analog phone connect to a WCTDM card.It used to work fine. Now recently, after several conf change and power restart,it stops working. Whenever I pickup the phone, instead of hearing the dial tone, I hear a busing beepingtone, like a machine gun is firing. :) However,from asterisk console, I do see a aOffHook/OnHook message, but whatever I dial in the phone keypad seems not recognized by asterisk, and it doesn't print out any messages.What could cause the problem? Any clues?Highly appreciate your help.Michael ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] *** Community alert :: Do you have open bugs in the bug tracker?
Asterisk buddies! If you have open issues in the bug tracker, please help us with providing fast responses. All developers are working real hard to close bugs pending the new release, so we kindly ask you for fast responses on our questions in the bug tracker. The quicker the better and we'll get 1.2 out of the door sooner. If you have new ideas, feature requests, thoughts - please keep the off the bug tracker until after the release. Thank you. Regards, /Olle ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk-RealTime: sip_friends and register = user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Script Head wrote: I am upgrading to Asterisk-Realtime and stumbled upon a problem converting my existing sip.conf register command to the RealTime format. It seems that sip_friends table setup doesn't allow for such thing to happen. So far the only way I see to do this is dumping the sip_friends table setup in favor of Asterisk RealTime Static (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk%20RealTime%20Static) which seems to be quite an ugly solution. Am I missing anything? No, you are perfectly right. The [general] and [authentication] sections can only be configured in Realtime Static. They're not supposed to change during execution unless you reload the basic SIP configuration. Peers and users are realtime realtime storages. In 1.3, we'll start adding registration to a peer section and removing the user... But that's another story. /O ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] What does the error stale nonce' mean?
Paul Conn wrote: I’m receiving the following error over and over, adnauseam: Oct 1 23:59:53 NOTICE[3194]: chan_sip.c:5890 check_auth: stale nonce received from ‘CNAME-CID sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]’ Does anyone know what “stale nonce” is? I've answered this question many times, so you should be able to find the answer... A stale nonce is when a device tries to re-authenticate with a nonce that is no longer valid. We are telling them that the nonce they used is invalid, and re-issue a new challenge and a fresh nonce. It's just an informative message, that I propably should move away to a debug level of some kind. /Olle ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] IBM tts engine integration
trixter wrote: do you have a url for an online demo? http://www.scansoft.com/speechworks/realspeak/demo/default.asp ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] IBM tts engine integration
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 08:56 +0100, razza wrote: trixter wrote: do you have a url for an online demo? http://www.scansoft.com/speechworks/realspeak/demo/default.asp Thanks its late so I prolly wont do this right now, but its a post method (same as sitepal and it looks easier than sitepal was). I will read their tos and make sure that anything I do wont violate that. 100 char limit it seems. Shouldnt be that hard, but I will be using netcat instead of wget/fetch. This does sound better.. if its usable the voice selection is also a lot more robust, and that is something I didnt like about the 2 choices with ibm (although my guess is that you can brute force voices out of ibm, its 3 letters in the url, I just didnt want to play those games incase they cried foul). -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] IBM tts engine integration
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 08:56 +0100, razza wrote: trixter wrote: do you have a url for an online demo? http://www.scansoft.com/speechworks/realspeak/demo/default.asp I wont be coding this. It isnt hard if someone else wants to fine, I personally wont though. The reason is quite simple: This demo is for demonstration purposes only. For other use, please contact our Sales Office. I am not gonna violate something so plain :) However they dont appear to have much by way of security (although I didnt verify cookies I dont think they are using them in any way for this, and that is trivial ...). Its a simple form post, with variables for the language and voice as well as content. Anyone that understands basical HTTP should be able to figure out what to send, and how to save the resulting 8khz wav file, like with netcat for example, or perhaps a simple LWP perl script, and then use sox to convert, save and blah blah blah. perl would likely be easier than netcat, and most systems now require it (I avoid it because its not mandatory it be on a system, however I havent seen one without bourne shell). -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] What does the error stale nonce' mean?
I'm receiving the following error over and over, adnauseam: Oct 1 23:59:53 NOTICE[3194]: chan_sip.c:5890 check_auth: stale nonce received from 'CNAME-CID sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]' In message itself no where it is written ERROR But thanks to Stewart and Olle for giving in depth information. /Gurmi ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: TE410P not working (autoanswer)
Simone Cittadini ha scritto: I'm trying to install a TE410P this is what happens with compiled zaptel 1.0.9, 1.2-beta and 1.0.9 from http://updates.xorcom.com/iso/ this is my zaptel.conf (checked with the provider the values): span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 bchan=1-15,17-31 dchan=16 loadzone=it defaultzone=it then I modprobe wct4xxp debug=1 t1e1override=15 and the kernel says : and zttool blinks : YEL/RED/REC T4XXP (PCI) Card 0 Span 1 starting asterisk changes a lot 'cause you get much more RED/REC than YEL/RED/REC Solved putting the digium in another pci slot ... ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] 911 Q
Joel Newkirk wrote on Friday, 30 September 2005 7:20 AM: Looking into setting up a couple asterisk servers at a country club, with VOIP phones in each of 100 short-term residential rental units. Approx 100 extensions, approx 24 outside lines. Since everything is geographically at one location, reaching 911 correctly shouldn't present a problem. However, the club wishes to ensure that 911 authorities are able to identify the precise rental unit placing the call. Mr. Newkirk, This and similar situations present a very serious issue for emergency responders. When you dial 911, your call is routed to the appropriate PSAP (Public Safety Answering Point) based on your ANI (Automatic Number Identification) or ELIN (Emergency Line Identification Number -- usually just another term for ANI). As your call arrives, the PSAP does a query of their ALI (Automatic Location Information) database to get your location information. Please note that the PSAP does NOT use Caller ID for this purpose. End users are not able to block their ANI (under normal circumstances), even though they may block their Caller ID. Either the ILEC or a company like Intrado will maintain the ALI database in your area. If you are getting your PRI and DIDs from your local ILEC, they would be responsible for getting the correct information entered into the ALI database. Typically, the information entered is only the physical address where the primary service is installed. In most circumstances, this information is enough to get police/fire/EMS to you in an emergency. However, I suspect the entire country club shares a single street address. If so, when someone dials 911, the PSAP will get only the main address of the country club. In this and similar situations, such as calling from within a multi-floor office building, a campus environment, etc., the main street address is simply not enough information to get emergency responders to you in a timely manner. Consider this not-so-unusual hypothetical scenario. A guest of the Pennsauken Country Club is having a heart attack in his bungalow. He dials 911. The dispatcher's screen at the PSAP shows the main information for the club (856) 662-4961 - 3800 Haddonfield Rd - Pennsauken Country Club - Pennsauken, NJ. The guest explains that he is experiencing severe chest pain, then either passes out before he can tell the dispatcher his exact location at the country club, or is confused or unaware of his exact location. The dispatcher would roll fire, EMS, and/or police to the main address. However, when they arrive, the emergency responders would have to knock on all 100+ doors to even attempt to determine who was having the emergency. Now you probably have a dead guest. Not good for business. First off, you should be using a PRI to connect your Asterisk server to the PSTN. You should also have a block of DIDs, with each guest room assigned its own, unique DID. This way you can differentiate among the individual rooms when people are making outbound calls, and guests may receive incoming calls in their room without going through an operator. Asterisk is capable of setting ANI in addition to Caller ID, on a per-call basis. This would ensure that the correct data is sent to the phone company when someone dials 911. As to getting the data to the PSAP to indicate where within the country club each DID is assigned, you have a couple of solutions. You can implement PS/ALI (Private Switch/Automatic Location Identification), or you can work with your telecom provider to have them enter the extended data into the ALI database for each DID individually. PS/ALI is the best solution, from a technical standpoint -- but it is usually quite expensive. PS/ALI allows you to provide the E-911 system with current, specific tenant location information to expedite emergency response times to the site of the emergency -- not just to the building or general site location. So when your guest having a heard attack in room 119 dials 911, the PSAP gets something more along the line of (856) 324-4119 - 3800 Haddonfield Rd - Building 5 Room 119 - Pennsauken Country Club - Pennsauken, NJ. PS/ALI is geared toward larger telecom users such as colleges, office buildings, large office campuses, etc., with a somewhat mobile population. It is utilized best when most of your extensions or DIDs are assigned to a person, as opposed to a location. This way, when the person moves from one office to another, your staff can push the change to the ALI database within minutes of the move, rather than phoning in a service order to the LEC, and waiting days for the change to be pushed to ALI. In your situation, I am assuming an extension or DID would most likely stay at a fixed location for quite some time (e.g. extension 4119 is always going to be guest room 119). So PS/ALI may be overkill in your situation. In that case, I would go the second route mentioned above. Work with your
[Asterisk-Users] US tollfree DID request
I am requesting rates sent private to avoid list clutter for tollfree DID service in the US. please include instate vs out of state rates if different. Expect moderate to high volume on this account. Thanks -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] RTCP-support
Please please please can any,all of you involved in this particular bug/patch please do whatever is required to get this into 1.2, whilst not directly affecting any of our internal configurations, does cause a number of support calls from Asterisk using clients who complain of dropped voicemail calls etc. http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=2863 Surely it can't be that hard for Asterisk to get one of the basic RTP features working! Linus - Original Message - From: Olle E. Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Users Asterisk asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 8:46 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] *** Community alert :: Do you have open bugs inthe bug tracker? Asterisk buddies! If you have open issues in the bug tracker, please help us with providing fast responses. All developers are working real hard to close bugs pending the new release, so we kindly ask you for fast responses on our questions in the bug tracker. The quicker the better and we'll get 1.2 out of the door sooner. If you have new ideas, feature requests, thoughts - please keep the off the bug tracker until after the release. Thank you. Regards, /Olle ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] codec g723 on Via C3
Hi, just a question: anyone has never installed g729 codec on VIA motherboard with C3 processor ? Im having problem with IPP libraries, and Intel said that it works only on Inter processor. Any suggestion? Thanks Giordano ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] SPA-3000 generating one-ring calls
This is a wierd one. Can't figure it out. I have an SPA-3000 at the house handling my incoming line. It's setup to direct the incoming call to asterisk. Works great 99% of the time. A few times a day, I'm getting calls that ring once internally and are then hungup. I managed to get a detailed log [1] of what's happening today and it looks to me that the SPA is acting wierd. Can someone verify this for me? I looks to me that the Sipura is just CANCEL'ing the call shortly (2 secs in this example) after setting it up. I'm looking for someone to verify this before I stop looking at Asterisk as the cause and focus on the SPA. Thanks in advance, Paul [1] http://dugas.cc/~pdugas/spa3k.log -- Paul Dugas, Computer Engineer Dugas Enterprises, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 404-932-1355 522 Black Canyon Park http://dugas.cc fax: 866-751-6494 Canton, GA 30114 USA -- Onsite at GDOT W.Annex 404-463-2860 x199 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Music on hold not initiating RTP stream?
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 06:47:51PM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Ray Van Dolson wrote: The ATA's are Sipura SPA-2002's and I have MOH Server set to 899 on each. Take that out, you don't need it. He had this in there for testing to show that the problem was not mpg123, which he did. However, with a call in progress, if I hit hold or flash on SIP ATA 1, it behaves correctly, but no music on hold is heard on SIP ATA 2. I can see in my Asterisk console that MusicOnHold() gets called and tcpdump shows the INVITE that first sets the RTP source to 0.0.0.0 then sets it to the IP of my Asterisk box. None of this is needed; Asterisk will stream MOH to ATA 2 all by itself, just by the fact that ATA 1 put ATA 2 on hold. You have over-complexified the setup :-) I'm not sure what you mean here. You do have to defind a MOH class for any channel not using default. I think the problem you have is that you have not indicated anywhere that you have set the MOH class for either channel to random. If you do not do that, it will try to use MOH class default. Make sure you test the default class with your 899 extension, or set the MOH class to random for the channels you are testing. HTH. -- -M There are 10 kinds of people in this world: Those who can count in binary and those who cannot. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] X100p Problem, randomly hungup pstn line
I installed this card, everything work, i can make call and receive call with no echo and great sound quality, but after between 5 to 50 secs the call disconnect by itself, in the log i don't see nothing revelant. In logging.conf, try enabling debug logging to the console and/or to /var/log/asterisk/messages to see if you can find the cause. chan_zap.c displays a lot of useful debug info if you enable the debug level logging. Also please post your zaptel.conf and zapata.conf config so we can have a look. Faris. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] How to establish ISDN port Up
We have ISDN PCI Adapter from Billion(using mISDN). When we connect it to the PSTN the incoming calls are OK. When we try to make a call we can't do that because the ISDN port is Down: CLI misdn show port 1 BEGIN STACK_LIST: * Stack Addr: 4041 Port 1 Type TE Prot. PMP L2Link DOWN L1Link:DOWN Idx: 0 stack-chan: 0 Chan 1 InUse:0 Idx: 1 stack-chan: 0 Chan 2 InUse:0 When we try to up manually we have the following: misdn port up 1 NO BC FOR STACK: port:1 TE_FRM_HANDLER: Returning 0 on prim:20382 port:1 Unhandled Message: prim 20382 len 0 from addr 4141, dinfo 2 on port: 1 How can estabilish the ISDN port to Up ? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] [Fwd: Eicon Diva 2.01 S/T PCI quality problems]
Hi all, I'm experimenting with Asterisk on linux using an Eicon Diva 2.01 S/T PCI card. I'd set up the card using the hisax driver and isdn4linux (titled as Old ISDN4Linux (obsolete) in the 2.6.12 kernel. I can make SIP calls and outgoing phone calls as well, but gathered a few problems on my way: 1. Plain SIP calls using softphones on windows clients work fine not counting the delay I'm experimenting. We talk about 1-1.5 secs delay in the speech which is rather distrubing (no noise in the line though). 2. Outgoing calls eg. to my mobile phone has some more serious problems. Speech quality on my mobile phone is excellent. However, sound quality on the asterisk console machine where I dialled from is about unacceptable. It has about 90% static noise and about 10% speech somewhere in the middle. I have the same experience calling from a windows softphone through asterisk to my handy, maybe a little less noise (around 80%). So my questions would be: can I do anything with the issues described above? Is it a hardware problem (eg. I need to replace the old and cheap card to a more modern one)? Maybe it's a driver problem (eg. the hisax driver is known to work only with such extreme static noise)? I also don't really understand why the static appears only on the server side and not on the called side. Any help or suggestions are much appreciated, thanks very much in advance. Kristof Jozsa ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-3000 generating one-ring calls
Do you have the SIP acct it's interacting with enabled for MWI? There's a setting in the SPA3k where it will ring the phone periodically for one ring in addition to the stutter tone for MWI. On 10/3/05, Paul Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a wierd one.Can't figure it out.I have an SPA-3000 at thehouse handling my incoming line.It's setup to direct the incoming call to asterisk.Works great 99% of the time.A few times a day, I'm getting calls that ring once internally and arethen hungup.I managed to get a detailed log [1] of what's happeningtoday and it looks to me that the SPA is acting wierd.Can someone verify this for me?I looks to me that the Sipura is just CANCEL'ing the call shortly (2 secsin this example) after setting it up.I'm looking for someone to verifythis before I stop looking at Asterisk as the cause and focus on the SPA. Thanks in advance,Paul[1] http://dugas.cc/~pdugas/spa3k.log--Paul Dugas, Computer Engineer Dugas Enterprises, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 404-932-1355 522 Black Canyon Parkhttp://dugas.cc fax: 866-751-6494 Canton, GA 30114 USA--Onsite at GDOT W.Annex 404-463-2860 x199___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] codec g723 on Via C3
I have a VIA Samuel 2, I use the Intel primitives (g729) setting the Makefile to a 586 processor. Maybe you can test with this. Regards. Jsalas. -Mensaje original-De: Giordano Grandis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Enviado el: Monday, October 03, 2005 7:06 AMPara: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionAsunto: [Asterisk-Users] codec g723 on Via C3 Hi, just a question: anyone has never installed g729 codec on VIA motherboard with C3 processor ? I'm having problem with IPP libraries, and Intel said that it works only on Inter processor. Any suggestion? Thanks Giordano ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] fc4 + iax + trunking
Hi, I m using asterisk on a system without a digium hardware, and when i try to use trunk=yes for my iax2 links, i just get this message while debugging: Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: AUTHREQ Timestamp: 6ms SCall: 16384 DCall: 16384 [192.168.1.1:4569] AUTHMETHODS : 2 CHALLENGE : 753310823 USERNAME: 350001 Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: INVAL Timestamp: 0ms SCall: 16384 DCall: 16384 [192.168.1.1:4569] if i remove trunk=yes, it works, but i would like to run multiple channels at the same time. zaptel was compiled normal (make clean ; make linux26 ; make install) and ztdummy was loaded without problems (modprobe ztdummy) which also loads zaptel driver. Does anyone has this problem too and a hint to fix it? Regards, -=Raul=- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-3000 generating one-ring calls
On Mon, October 3, 2005 9:33 am, BJ Weschke wrote: Do you have the SIP acct it's interacting with enabled for MWI? There's a setting in the SPA3k where it will ring the phone periodically for one ring in addition to the stutter tone for MWI. I'm not using the SPA3k as an extension at the moment; just as an FXO interface. The SPA is initiating a SIP call to the Asterisk server then DELETE'ing it 2 secs later. Asterisk is ringing other IAX/SIP extensions in response. The FXS interface of the SPA3k *is* setup and registering with the server but it's never getting called and it doesn't have anything connected to it. Curious, Paul -- Paul Dugas, Computer Engineer Dugas Enterprises, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 404-932-1355 522 Black Canyon Park http://dugas.cc fax: 866-751-6494 Canton, GA 30114 USA -- Onsite at GDOT W.Annex 404-463-2860 x199 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Problem with configuration of Quintum AX with Asterisk
Hi. I'm trying to configurate Quintum AX to work with Asterisk SIP egister/Proxy server and my problem is that only the first user account get logged in and only that user is able to make call correctly. It seems to be a problem with authorization - I have noticed no Proxy-Authorization information in SIP INVITE, ACK, CANCEL messages. I have also noticed that when I remove secret from Asterisk sip.conf file (no authorization required) other users (accounts) can make a call but no media are sent. Do you know reasons of this problem and can you help me resolving it. Michał Misiak -- Have a nice day! phone: (+48 22) 4330419 mobile: (+48) 888 395 336 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] homepage: www.michalmisiak.prv.pl ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
R: [Asterisk-Users] codec g723 on Via C3
Thankswhich version of IPP did u use ? I do not have Makefile file.there is only a .sh script Thanks Giordano Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Juan Salas Inviato: lunedì 3 ottobre 2005 15.41 A: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Oggetto: RE: [Asterisk-Users] codec g723 on Via C3 I have a VIA Samuel 2, I use the Intel primitives (g729) setting the Makefile to a 586 processor. Maybe you can test with this. Regards. Jsalas. -Mensaje original- De: Giordano Grandis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: Monday, October 03, 2005 7:06 AM Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Asunto: [Asterisk-Users] codec g723 on Via C3 Hi, just a question: anyone has never installed g729 codec on VIA motherboard with C3 processor ? I'm having problem with IPP libraries, and Intel said that it works only on Inter processor. Any suggestion? Thanks Giordano ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-3000 generating one-ring calls
What is the FXO port connected to? An ATA from another VoIP provider? I've seen this same behavior when I reset the ATA that I have for ATT CallVantage service at home that is connected to the FXO port of a spa3k. I've got to imagine it is some kind of momentary dip or spike in the line voltage that is coming through the FXO port. On 10/3/05, Paul Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, October 3, 2005 9:33 am, BJ Weschke wrote: Do you have the SIP acct it's interacting with enabled for MWI? There's a setting in the SPA3k where it will ring the phone periodically for one ring in addition to the stutter tone for MWI.I'm not using the SPA3k as an extension at the moment; just as an FXOinterface.The SPA is initiating a SIP call to the Asterisk server then DELETE'ing it 2 secs later.Asterisk is ringing other IAX/SIP extensionsin response.The FXS interface of the SPA3k *is* setup and registeringwith the server but it's never getting called and it doesn't have anything connected to it.Curious,Paul--Paul Dugas, Computer Engineer Dugas Enterprises, LLC[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 404-932-1355 522 Black Canyon Park http://dugas.cc fax: 866-751-6494 Canton, GA 30114 USA--Onsite at GDOT W.Annex 404-463-2860 x199 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-3000 generating one-ring calls
On Mon, October 3, 2005 10:10 am, BJ Weschke wrote: What is the FXO port connected to? An ATA from another VoIP provider? It's just a POTS line from the local telco (Alltel). I've got to imagine it is some kind of momentary dip or spike in the line voltage that is coming through the FXO port. Curious that it has recently (past couple months) started happening while the SPA3k has been in service since April. Curiuser and curiouser... Paul -- Paul Dugas, Computer Engineer Dugas Enterprises, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 404-932-1355 522 Black Canyon Park http://dugas.cc fax: 866-751-6494 Canton, GA 30114 USA -- Onsite at GDOT W.Annex 404-463-2860 x199 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Question about 3Com(r) 3101 Basic Phone
Hi, i have one question, the 3Com 3101 Basic Phone work with asterisk, if so i any a especial firmware o another thing. And wath other 3com ip phone product work with asterisk. I think is a good idea to create a list with the all voip device and the status with asterisk. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] X100p Problem, randomly hungup pstn line
This is my zaptel and zapata. In my logger.conf this is what is enabled : full = notice,warning,error,debug,verbose. How can you turn on the log in chan_zap.c and where you can access it. You can see i'm a newbee :-) Thanks for your help Pierre ; ; Zapata telephony interface ; ; Configuration file [trunkgroups] [channels] language=en context=from-pstn signalling=fxs_ks rxwink=300 ; Atlas seems to use long (250ms) winks ; ; Whether or not to do distinctive ring detection on FXO lines ; ;usedistinctiveringdetection=yes usecallerid=yes hidecallerid=no ;callwaiting=yes ;usecallingpres=yes ;callwaitingcallerid=yes threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes callreturn=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=no echotraining=800 rxgain=0.0 txgain=0.0 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 immediate=no answeronpolarityswitch=yes hanguponpolarityswitch=yes busydetect=yes busycount=20 callprogress=yes ;faxdetect=both faxdetect=incoming ;faxdetect=outgoing ;faxdetect=no ;Include AMP configs #include zapata_additional.conf hanguponpolarityswitch ;Include genzaptelconf configs #include zapata-auto.conf ;channel=1 callerid=asreceived # Zaptel Configuration File # # This file is parsed by the Zaptel Configurator, ztcfg # # It must be in the module loading order # Span 1: WCFXO/0 Generic Clone Board 1 fxsks=1 # Global data loadzone= us defaultzone = us ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] asterisk behind Linux iptables with masquerading and forwarding on
Hi, I have this setup DSL ROUTERLINUX-ASTERISK LINUX acts as a router with this config: ppp0 - internet interface (public) eth1 - private interface: 192.168.1.254 asterisk interface 192.168.1.251 settings on LINUX: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j MASQUERADE echo 1 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp --dport 5060 -i ppp0 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.251 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp --dport 1:2 -i ppp0 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.251 Before I had this setup I had the same config, but instead of LINUX i used the Wr54G router with port forwarding on. It looks like that I misconfigured the iptables, but I dont know what I did wrong. Do I have to add extra translation settings. Thanks Any ideas??? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Nufone
After -- IAX2/NuFone/3 is making progress passing it to SIP/3044-bcd0 I'm getting a Busy tone and it's not even connecting the call. -- Executing Macro(SIP/3044-bcd0, outvoip-2|1800759) in new stack -- Executing SetCIDName(SIP/3044-bcd0, X X X|a) in new stack -- Executing SetCIDNum(SIP/3044-bcd0, 8663xx3|a) in new stack -- Executing Authenticate(SIP/3044-bcd0, xx) in new stack -- Playing 'agent-pass' (language 'en') -- Playing 'auth-thankyou' (language 'en') -- Executing Monitor(SIP/3044-bcd0, wav) in new stack -- Executing Ringing(SIP/3044-bcd0, ) in new stack -- Executing Wait(SIP/3044-bcd0, 2) in new stack -- Executing Dial(SIP/3044-bcd0, IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1800759) in new stack -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1800759 -- Call accepted by 66.225.202.72 (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw -- IAX2/NuFone/3 is making progress passing it to SIP/3044-bcd0 -- Hungup 'IAX2/NuFone/3' == Spawn extension (macro-outvoip-2, s, 7) exited non-zero on 'SIP/3044-bcd0' in macro 'outvoip-2' == Spawn extension (crystal-sip, 8800759, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/3044-bcd0' x*CLI iax2 show peers Name/UsernameHost Mask Port Status voicepulse2/Fbg 66.234.228.166 (S) 255.255.255.255 4569 Unmonitored voicepulse1/Fbg 66.234.228.160 (S) 255.255.255.255 4569 Unmonitored NuFone 66.225.202.72 (S) 255.255.255.255 4569 Unmonitored __ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 Q
Think you might have jumped to a conclusion that might not be valid. If the telco can handle a PRI and will accept callerid from you, and each unit has a valid telephone number, then the telco can populate the callerid database with names. Those are the only two items the telco can provide in real time. The 911 center manager can better tell you exactly how they populate their database with street addresses and unit numbers. That process is likely an external non-automated process, or, the local telco is giving them the info via a electronic/paper copy of their service order. But, he's the only one that can tell you exactly how that works for his center. So, don't give. Go to the 911 manager and do some research; then go to his contact at the telco to get the real facts. Thank you - while not directly an answer to my question, it directly addresses the root of my question, pointing me where I'll need to go to dig deeper. It also tells me what we didn't want to hear, that there's a very good possibility that we simply won't be able to ensure that the 911 call center can tell which unit a call comes from without verbal specification from the caller. j On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 08:13 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: Asterisk is more then capable of sending the appropriate callerid info to any remote site including 911 centers. However, there is a telco between asterisk and the 911 center that may not have realistic policies/systems to accept and forward that callerid. So, your objective becomes one of what the telco will allow you to do (and their support of your objective). As one example only, the telco might have a switch that does not have PRI capabilities (I know of many of these), but they provide ANI info to the 911 centers since that _might_ be the only data they can provide. If that were the case in your environment, it doesn't make any difference what you do with asterisk, it won't be supported. I know from practical experience that a telco's switch (in most cases) will accept calleridnum via a PRI, but on most central office switches its an option that needs to be turned on. (Local telco policy _might_ say they will never do that.) Once that option is turned on, you can send almost anything to them in the form of calleridnum. The callerid name is a different story. The central office switch that _terminates_ any call (including 911 calls) will have a mechanism to do a database lookup/dip, and if that database has not been populated with an appropriate callerid name, will not provide callerid names to the 911 center (or anyone else). That essentially says you can program asterisk to send anything that you want from a callerid name perspective and it will be ignored in the US. In very general terms, only telco personnal have the access to update the callerid database, and usually that is limited to the CO prefixes they support. Also keep in mind that not all 911 centers are the same from a technical perspective. They certainly accept callerid numbers, but they may have their own local database for names (etc), or, they may also do a database lookup from some distant database. If you think about those customers that subscribe to callerid blocking, cell phones gps, and the requirements of 911 centers, its not hard to visualize several different 911 implementation approaches. Talk to a knowledgable telco person (might be somewhat difficult to find the appropriate person), and talk to the 911 center manager to better understand what options you might have available. I'd start with the 911 manager as he will know a telco person that understands the technical requirements. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ---End of Original Message- ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Adding Cepstral to Asterisk
Then did you do a make clean / make / make install? Then do show applications at the CLI prompt after you have restarted asterisk. service asterisk stop service asterisk start ... I downloaded Cepstral to my Asterisk Box. I did the install and let it install to /opt/swift. I brought down a new CVS-HEAD as of today 10/1. I added APPS+=app_cepstral.so into the Makefile in /usr/src/asterisk/apps/Makefile Like: # Obsolete things... # #APPS+=app_sql_postgres.so #APPS+=app_sql_odbc.so APPS+=app_cepstral.so # I did this piece but wasn't sure exactly what part of the Makefile I was to add it in so I added it in here: Towards the top of the file where it talks obsolete programs are commented out. And then after the section that compiles voicemail add: app_cepstral.so: app_cepstral.c $(CC) -D_GNU_SOURCE -shared -Xlinker -x -o $@ $ -lz -lm -lswift -lceplex_us -lceplang_en -lz -ldl -L/opt/swift/lib -I/opt/swift/include Make sure the $(CC) line starts with a tab, not spaces. I didn't see a lot about voicemail: app_sql_odbc.so: app_sql_odbc.o $(CC) $(SOLINK) -o $@ $ -lodbc app_cepstral.so: app_cepstral.c $(CC) -D_GNU_SOURCE -shared -Xlinker -x -o $@ $ -lz -lm -lswift -lceplex_us -lceplang_en -lz -ldl -L/opt/swift/lib -I/opt/swift/include look: look.c $(CC) -pipe -O6 -g look.c -o look -lncurses I checked the /etc/ld.so.conf file for a line like: opt/swift/lib in the file. It wasn't there so I added it: include ld.so.conf.d/*.conf /opt/swift/lib I ran ldconfig when I was done. I can't see that Cepstral was added into Asterisk and I was wondering what I have done wrong that it doesn't work. Thanks. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
R: [Asterisk-Users] Diva
Which models of Diva could work with CAPI and asterisk? Thanks Giordano Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di [EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: sabato 1 ottobre 2005 23.46 A: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Oggetto: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Diva Nope. At least I tried and never could get it working. It's a semiactive. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Giordano Grandis Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 6:59 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Diva Hi all, just a question: can i use this kind of diva for asterisk? 00:14.0 Network controller: Eicon Networks Corporation Diva ISDN Pro 3.0 PCI Thanks all Giordano ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Revieving some fax problems
I would say the problem here could fall in this category. Jason Walker a écrit : I have run into a similar situation. One of our older faxes at the office seems to not work with spandsp module. The newer faxes work just fine. When I watch the logs, there appears to be communication from * requesting the fax to slow down. When the fax machine does not respond, * seems to say forget it and fail on the retrieval. I have not come up with a fix...regardless of rx/tx gains on the zaptel cards. -- Alexandre Leclerc ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Adding Cepstral to Asterisk
I am not following... Why would you need to integrate Cepstral directly into Asterisk? Just to be able to call it as Asterisk app from your dialplan? I am running Cepstral and calling it through the System call. Thanks, Wojtek - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Adding Cepstral to Asterisk Then did you do a make clean / make / make install? Then do show applications at the CLI prompt after you have restarted asterisk. service asterisk stop service asterisk start ... I downloaded Cepstral to my Asterisk Box. I did the install and let it install to /opt/swift. I brought down a new CVS-HEAD as of today 10/1. I added APPS+=app_cepstral.so into the Makefile in /usr/src/asterisk/apps/Makefile Like: # Obsolete things... # #APPS+=app_sql_postgres.so #APPS+=app_sql_odbc.so APPS+=app_cepstral.so # I did this piece but wasn't sure exactly what part of the Makefile I was to add it in so I added it in here: Towards the top of the file where it talks obsolete programs are commented out. And then after the section that compiles voicemail add: app_cepstral.so: app_cepstral.c $(CC) -D_GNU_SOURCE -shared -Xlinker -x -o $@ $ -lz -lm -lswift -lceplex_us -lceplang_en -lz -ldl -L/opt/swift/lib -I/opt/swift/include Make sure the $(CC) line starts with a tab, not spaces. I didn't see a lot about voicemail: app_sql_odbc.so: app_sql_odbc.o $(CC) $(SOLINK) -o $@ $ -lodbc app_cepstral.so: app_cepstral.c $(CC) -D_GNU_SOURCE -shared -Xlinker -x -o $@ $ -lz -lm -lswift -lceplex_us -lceplang_en -lz -ldl -L/opt/swift/lib -I/opt/swift/include look: look.c $(CC) -pipe -O6 -g look.c -o look -lncurses I checked the /etc/ld.so.conf file for a line like: opt/swift/lib in the file. It wasn't there so I added it: include ld.so.conf.d/*.conf /opt/swift/lib I ran ldconfig when I was done. I can't see that Cepstral was added into Asterisk and I was wondering what I have done wrong that it doesn't work. Thanks. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] no audio on fxo line
Hi, I got back from two weeks away and appear to have lost audio on my tdm411 fxo. Everything was working properly when I left. I checked the logs, config files and can't see any problems, the zap channels and modules are all loaded properly, asterisk starts without probs and everything looks sweet on the colsole with -c when I make calls, but I just don't hear a dialtone or any audio anymore. I tried opening the sound monitor and that looks as though appropriate sounds are being sent. When I pick up the handset all I can hear is a slight crackling noise. The fxo line rings but I don't hear audio through any phones connected to it.. I'm not really sure what I can try to resolve this - has anybody got some suggetion? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re:Any way to not overwrite sound files on compile?
On Sat, 2005-10-01 at 07:39 -0600, Rich Adamson wrote: I believe you meant to say make update. upgrade is not a defined parameter. No, I meant to say exactly what I said. Read the F Makefile :), line 677 upgrade: all bininstall -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] updating display of a hardphone based on agentslogging in
I'm also using SNOM320/360 phones. Ideally - set up one button to toggle the Agent Status (in/out == On/Off) ??? Kinda make sense if app_devstate (or similar) made it into mainstrean Asterisk - so line indication lamps could be used at will. The SNOM320 is so ideal for Call Centres (the Headset control it gives one) - I'm surprised that there is not a dedicated Agent Has Logged-in icon... :-) On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 10:20 +0200, Nils Ohlmeier wrote: On the Snom phones you can use a SIP MESSAGE to overwrite the idle screen text with a given text message. Maybe that is helpfull for your scenario. Regards Nils Ohlmeier Nils (or anyone else) - how does one do this from Asterisk? You've got the Snom 320's, so maybe the most straight forward thing to do would be to use the Hint application with them to light a status LED when an agent is logged in and have it go dark when the agent is logged out. We are settng up a fair sized call center on Asterisk, but we are having -- . . ___. .__ Posix Systems - Sth Africa. e.164 VOIP ready /| /| / /__ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mark J Elkins, Cisco CCIE / |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS Tel: +27 12 807 0590 Cell: +27 82 601 0496 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: R: [Asterisk-Users] Diva
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Giordano Grandis wrote: Which models of Diva could work with CAPI and asterisk? - 'Diva Server' PCI cards with 'divas' driver from melware.net or Eicon source RPM - passive Diva cards supported by mISDN Armin Thanks Giordano Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di [EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: sabato 1 ottobre 2005 23.46 A: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Oggetto: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Diva Nope. At least I tried and never could get it working. It's a semiactive. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Giordano Grandis Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 6:59 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Diva Hi all, just a question: can i use this kind of diva for asterisk? 00:14.0 Network controller: Eicon Networks Corporation Diva ISDN Pro 3.0 PCI Thanks all Giordano ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-3000 generating one-ring calls
This is a wierd one. Can't figure it out. I have an SPA-3000 at the house handling my incoming line. It's setup to direct the incoming call to asterisk. Works great 99% of the time. A few times a day, I'm getting calls that ring once internally and are then hungup. I managed to get a detailed log [1] of what's happening today and it looks to me that the SPA is acting wierd. Can someone verify this for me? I looks to me that the Sipura is just CANCEL'ing the call shortly (2 secs in this example) after setting it up. I'm looking for someone to verify this before I stop looking at Asterisk as the cause and focus on the SPA. Not likely anyone is going to comment on this without looking at your traces, s/w versions, config detail, etc. There are just too many ways to configure an spa and guessing at what you've done is impossible. FWIW, mine and others are working fine. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Nufone
how many digits is your callerid passing to the trunk? I am seeing 11 8663xx3 is that correct? I had an issue last week with passing to many digits to my provider and the call would hang up immediately. You could also turn debugging on for this so we can get a better log. iax2 debug peer nufoneOn 10/3/05, Crystal Stream, Incorporated [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After -- IAX2/NuFone/3 is making progress passing itto SIP/3044-bcd0 I'm getting a Busy tone and it's not even connecting the call.-- Executing Macro(SIP/3044-bcd0,outvoip-2|1800759) in new stack-- Executing SetCIDName(SIP/3044-bcd0, X X X|a) in new stack-- Executing SetCIDNum(SIP/3044-bcd0,8663xx3|a) in new stack-- Executing Authenticate(SIP/3044-bcd0, xx)in new stack-- Playing 'agent-pass' (language 'en') -- Playing 'auth-thankyou' (language 'en')-- Executing Monitor(SIP/3044-bcd0, wav) in newstack-- Executing Ringing(SIP/3044-bcd0, ) in new stack-- Executing Wait(SIP/3044-bcd0, 2) in new stack -- Executing Dial(SIP/3044-bcd0,IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1800759) in new stack-- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1800759-- Call accepted by 66.225.202.72 (format ulaw)-- Format for call is ulaw-- IAX2/NuFone/3 is making progress passing it toSIP/3044-bcd0-- Hungup 'IAX2/NuFone/3'== Spawn extension (macro-outvoip-2, s, 7) exitednon-zero on 'SIP/3044-bcd0' in macro 'outvoip-2' == Spawn extension (crystal-sip, 8800759, 1)exited non-zero on 'SIP/3044-bcd0'x*CLI iax2 show peersName/UsernameHost MaskPortStatusvoicepulse2/Fbg66.234.228.166(S)255.255.255.2554569Unmonitoredvoicepulse1/Fbg 66.234.228.160(S)255.255.255.2554569UnmonitoredNuFone 66.225.202.72 (S)255.255.255.255 4569Unmonitored__Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005http://mail.yahoo.com___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Tom VileBaldwin Technology Solutions, IncConsulting - Web Design - VoIP Telephonywww.baldwintechsolutions.com Phone: 518-631-2855 x205Fax: 518-631-2856 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk for Man-In-The-Middle Trunk Side Call Recording?
On 09/30/05 03:12 Verlin Henderson said the following: Xeon server (most likely a Dell PowerEdge 2800, 2850, or similar) with a large amount of RAM and RAID-1 SCSI setup. We would add three TE411P or TE410P cards and implement something similar to Matt Roth's setup, but on a smaller scale. has the limit on 254 zap channels per server been removed ? admittedly, i may have missed the change where this occured, but it's certainly there in zaptel from a few months back. -- Regards, /\_/\ All dogs go to heaven. [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)http://www.alphaque.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b. | | done; done | +=+ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-3000 generating one-ring calls
That's interesting for sure. I'd bet if you had some way to monitor what was going on with the FXO (voltage) side of things you'd probably find that something is happening that is causing the spa3k to believe that it's receiving ring voltage on the line. You can tune these settings in International Control in the Advanced/Admin and PSTN Line tab section of the Spa3k config, but you've got to know what and for how long you're receiving something first before you know what to tune. On 10/3/05, Paul Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, October 3, 2005 10:10 am, BJ Weschke wrote: What is the FXO port connected to? An ATA from another VoIP provider? It's just a POTS line from the local telco (Alltel). I've got to imagine it is some kind of momentary dip or spike in the line voltage that is coming through the FXO port.Curious that it has recently (past couple months) started happening while the SPA3k has been in service since April.Curiuser and curiouser...Paul--Paul Dugas, Computer Engineer Dugas Enterprises, LLC[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 404-932-1355 522 Black Canyon Park http://dugas.cc fax: 866-751-6494 Canton, GA 30114 USA--Onsite at GDOT W.Annex 404-463-2860 x199___--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fritz, mISDN, Help
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 09:38 +0100, Derek Conniffe wrote: Is anyone out there running two AVM Fritz ISDN cards? Yes Are you using a 2.6.XX kernel? No How are you doing it? Easily :) Really just carefully follow the instructions in the hack you've already mentioned. It works, but I did chicken out on 3. -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] no audio on fxo line
I got back from two weeks away and appear to have lost audio on my tdm411 fxo. Everything was working properly when I left. I checked the logs, config files and can't see any problems, the zap channels and modules are all loaded properly, asterisk starts without probs and everything looks sweet on the colsole with -c when I make calls, but I just don't hear a dialtone or any audio anymore. I tried opening the sound monitor and that looks as though appropriate sounds are being sent. When I pick up the handset all I can hear is a slight crackling noise. The fxo line rings but I don't hear audio through any phones connected to it.. I'm not really sure what I can try to resolve this - has anybody got some suggetion? Check to see what revision of TDM card you have. The rev E/F cards and earlier had a problem that sounds just like what you are hearing and the only fix is to replace the card. Contact support at digium. The problem usually happens anywhere from one to two weeks after a reboot. Stopping asterisk, unload and reload the drivers, and start asterisk also clears the problem without a reboot. Since the card has a two year warranty and hasn't been out that long, you should be able to get digium to replace it at no cost. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] SIP-CPE Gateway
Has anyone used the GSM-SIP gateway product produced by a company at sipcpe.com? Any comments? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] What does the error stale nonce' mean?
On Monday 03 Oct 2005 08:51, Olle E. Johansson wrote: Paul Conn wrote: I’m receiving the following error over and over, adnauseam: Oct 1 23:59:53 NOTICE[3194]: chan_sip.c:5890 check_auth: stale nonce received from ‘CNAME-CID sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]’ Does anyone know what “stale nonce” is? I've answered this question many times, so you should be able to find the answer... A stale nonce is when a device tries to re-authenticate with a nonce that is no longer valid. We are telling them that the nonce they used is invalid, and re-issue a new challenge and a fresh nonce. It's just an informative message, that I propably should move away to a debug level of some kind. I wish someone had read a British dictionary before they decided to use this word It make no sense at all. B ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk for Man-In-The-Middle Trunk Side Call Recording?
Yes. It's gone. On 10/3/05, Dinesh Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/30/05 03:12 Verlin Henderson said the following: Xeon server (most likely a Dell PowerEdge 2800, 2850, or similar) with a large amount of RAM and RAID-1 SCSI setup. We would add three TE411P or TE410P cards and implement something similar to Matt Roth's setup, but on a smaller scale.has the limit on 254 zap channels per server been removed ? admittedly, i may have missed the change where this occured, but it's certainly there inzaptel from a few months back.--Regards, /\_/\ All dogs go to heaven. [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)http://www.alphaque.com/+==oOO--(_)--OOo==+| for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do || echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b.|| done; done| +=+___--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-3000 generating one-ring calls
On Mon, October 3, 2005 12:44 pm, Rich Adamson wrote: Not likely anyone is going to comment on this without looking at your traces, s/w versions, config detail, etc. There are just too many ways to configure an spa and guessing at what you've done is impossible. Good point. The trace of what happened is in available for donwload [1] if anyone is curious. I'm running Asterisk CVS HEAD last updated Sep-23. The SPA3k is running 3.1.5(GWb) firmware and is very close to the stock config; have set NTP host, timezone, DST rule, Line 1 proxy/userID/password, PSTN Line proxy/userID/password and the PSTN-to-VOIP Gateway settings. FWIW, mine and others are working fine. This one used to work fine too :) Thanks, Paul [1] http://dugas.cc/~pdugas/spa3k.log -- Paul Dugas, Computer Engineer Dugas Enterprises, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone: 404-932-1355 522 Black Canyon Park http://dugas.cc fax: 866-751-6494 Canton, GA 30114 USA -- Onsite at GDOT W.Annex 404-463-2860 x199 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] suse 9.3 pro asterisk install from source problem
Hi, Can any one help Im trying to install asterisk on suse 9.3 pro from cvs release v1_0 version 1.0.9 and when I try to make from the asterisk directory I get the following error. Is there anybody that could give me a pointer as to what the issue may be? DDIR=\/usr/lib/asterisk/modules\ -DASTAGIDIR=\/var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin\ -DBUSYDETECT_MARTIN -DZAPATA_MOH -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -fPIC -c -o res_indications.o res_indications.c gcc -shared -Xlinker -x -o res_indications.so res_indications.o gcc -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -Iinclude -I../include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O6 -march=i686 -DZAPTEL_OPTIMIZATIONS -DASTERISK_VERSION=\CVS-v1-0-09/30/05-22:31:05\ -DINSTALL_PREFIX=\\ -DASTETCDIR=\/etc/asterisk\ -DASTLIBDIR=\/usr/lib/asterisk\ -DASTVARLIBDIR=\/var/lib/asterisk\ -DASTVARRUNDIR=\/var/run\ -DASTSPOOLDIR=\/var/spool/asterisk\ -DASTLOGDIR=\/var/log/asterisk\ -DASTCONFPATH=\/etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf\ -DASTMODDIR=\/usr/lib/asterisk/modules\ -DASTAGIDIR=\/var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin\ -DBUSYDETECT_MARTIN -DZAPATA_MOH -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -fPIC -c -o res_monitor.o res_monitor.c gcc -shared -Xlinker -x -o res_monitor.so res_monitor.o gcc -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -Iinclude -I../include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O6 -march=i686 -DZAPTEL_OPTIMIZATIONS -DASTERISK_VERSION=\CVS-v1-0-09/30/05-22:31:05\ -DINSTALL_PREFIX=\\ -DASTETCDIR=\/etc/asterisk\ -DASTLIBDIR=\/usr/lib/asterisk\ -DASTVARLIBDIR=\/var/lib/asterisk\ -DASTVARRUNDIR=\/var/run\ -DASTSPOOLDIR=\/var/spool/asterisk\ -DASTLOGDIR=\/var/log/asterisk\ -DASTCONFPATH=\/etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf\ -DASTMODDIR=\/usr/lib/asterisk/modules\ -DASTAGIDIR=\/var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin\ -DBUSYDETECT_MARTIN -DZAPATA_MOH -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -fPIC -c -o res_agi.o res_agi.c gcc -shared -Xlinker -x -o res_agi.so res_agi.o make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/development/asteriskv1-0_1.0.9/asterisk/res' make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/development/asteriskv1-0_1.0.9/asterisk/channels' gcc -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -Iinclude -I../include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O6 -march=i686 -DZAPTEL_OPTIMIZATIONS -DASTERISK_VERSION=\CVS-v1-0-09/30/05-22:31:05\ -DINSTALL_PREFIX=\\ -DASTETCDIR=\/etc/asterisk\ -DASTLIBDIR=\/usr/lib/asterisk\ -DASTVARLIBDIR=\/var/lib/asterisk\ -DASTVARRUNDIR=\/var/run\ -DASTSPOOLDIR=\/var/spool/asterisk\ -DASTLOGDIR=\/var/log/asterisk\ -DASTCONFPATH=\/etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf\ -DASTMODDIR=\/usr/lib/asterisk/modules\ -DASTAGIDIR=\/var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin\ -DBUSYDETECT_MARTIN -Wno-missing-prototypes -Wno-missing-declarations -DZAPATA_PRI -DIAX_TRUNKING -DCRYPTO -fPIC -c -o chan_modem.o chan_modem.c gcc -shared -Xlinker -x -o chan_modem.so chan_modem.o gcc -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -g -Iinclude -I../include -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O6 -march=i686 -DZAPTEL_OPTIMIZATIONS -DASTERISK_VERSION=\CVS-v1-0-09/30/05-22:31:05\ -DINSTALL_PREFIX=\\ -DASTETCDIR=\/etc/asterisk\ -DASTLIBDIR=\/usr/lib/asterisk\ -DASTVARLIBDIR=\/var/lib/asterisk\ -DASTVARRUNDIR=\/var/run\ -DASTSPOOLDIR=\/var/spool/asterisk\ -DASTLOGDIR=\/var/log/asterisk\ -DASTCONFPATH=\/etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf\ -DASTMODDIR=\/usr/lib/asterisk/modules\ -DASTAGIDIR=\/var/lib/asterisk/agi-bin\ -DBUSYDETECT_MARTIN -Wno-missing-prototypes -Wno-missing-declarations -DZAPATA_PRI -DIAX_TRUNKING -DCRYPTO -fPIC -c -o chan_sip.o chan_sip.c chan_sip.c:9319: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid _expression_ as operand Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://www.suse.de/feedback for instructions. {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:123824: Warning: partial line at end of file ignored Preprocessed source stored into /tmp/ccxI4zbE.out file, please attach this to your bugreport. make[1]: *** [chan_sip.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/development/asteriskv1-0_1.0.9/asterisk/channels' make: *** [subdirs] Error 1 Ashley Wright Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.OciusB2.com OciusB2 Limited The Heath Runcorm Cheshire WA7 4QX Tel:0870 7578700 Fax: 01928 515401 Note. This email is confidential, may be legally privileged, and is for the intended recipient only. Access, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited and may be a criminal offence. Please delete if obtained in error and email confirmation to the sender. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Inter Asterisk IAX2
Hello, Would like to use IAX /IAX2 to transport 30 channels inter Asterisk. I don't have any experience with that, so can someone help ?? How much bw do I need and what latency for SIP G711 to IAX and vice-versa , ... etc ? Thanks in advance for any info, Geo ___ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TDMoE help with Alarms...
I have configured TDMoE sucessfully and I am able to make a Zap connection from one box to the other. The question I have is.. I'm getting repeated errors every second on both systems.. Oct 3 09:53:16 WARNING[4409]: chan_zap.c:6252 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 1: No Alarm Oct 3 09:53:16 WARNING[4409]: chan_zap.c:6252 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 2: No Alarm Oct 3 09:53:16 WARNING[4409]: chan_zap.c:6252 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 3: No Alarm Oct 3 09:53:16 WARNING[4409]: chan_zap.c:6252 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 4: No Alarm Oct 3 09:53:16 WARNING[4409]: chan_zap.c:6252 handle_init_event: Detected alarm on channel 5: No Alarm Oct 3 09:53:16 NOTICE[4409]: chan_zap.c:6247 handle_init_event: Alarm cleared on channel 1 Oct 3 09:53:16 NOTICE[4409]: chan_zap.c:6247 handle_init_event: Alarm cleared on channel 2 Oct 3 09:53:16 NOTICE[4409]: chan_zap.c:6247 handle_init_event: Alarm cleared on channel 3 Oct 3 09:53:16 NOTICE[4409]: chan_zap.c:6247 handle_init_event: Alarm cleared on channel 4 Oct 3 09:53:16 NOTICE[4409]: chan_zap.c:6247 handle_init_event: Alarm cleared on channel 5 What is causing these errors? When i do a zttool it shows that there are no errors... Thanks... ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 Q
On Monday 03 October 2005 12:17, Rich Adamson wrote: Think you might have jumped to a conclusion that might not be valid. If the telco can handle a PRI and will accept callerid from you, and each unit has a valid telephone number, then the telco can populate the callerid database with names. Those are the only two items the telco can provide in real time. I have some information from the 911 service manager for Bell Canada in Eastern Ontario. Basically the Public Service Automatic Location Indentification database (PSALI) only has allocations for BTNs (Billing Telephone Numbers) -- there are no ALI entries for DIDs from Bell Canada at this time, and there is no plan to do this. Basically if you set your outgoing ANI to a DID the PSAP office will have no address information, and indeed the switch may end up overwriting your ANI with the BTN. Since DIDs do not have an address associated with them (makes sense, they are only inward-numbers by design), you can convert DIDs to LDNs (Local Directory Number, same thing but has a directory (address) associated with it) -- the unfortunate side-effect of that is that LDNs are all billed separately so you would receive a separate bill for every LDN on a PRI. There is a service (of course!) being offered where you can provide specifically-formatted records for the PSALI database. It's not cheap, it's a $2000 setup fee and (IIRC) $500/mo for up to 500 record changes, and a two-year contract minimum. (These figures might be off, it's from memory.) However if you subscribe to this service you can assign any municipal address to any number and it will make its way into the PSALI database, which is what all the primary PSAP offices use to get the address information before routing the call to the appropriate secondary PSAP office. At least with Bell Canada, this is the only way to get your user's address information into the database used by the primary PSAP offices. The alternative, of course, is to set up your own primary PSAP system and then you can use whatever database and organization system you want, and redirect calls to the appropriate secondary PSAP office yourself. -A. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] updating display of a hardphone based on agentslogging in
Hi! On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:41:38PM +0200, Mark Elkins wrote: I'm also using SNOM320/360 phones. Ideally - set up one button to toggle the Agent Status (in/out == On/Off) ??? Kinda make sense if app_devstate (or similar) made it into mainstrean Asterisk - so line indication lamps could be used at will. Just another thought: You could also simply use the snom DND button, define an Action URL on the phone for both DND on and off and let that web page (.cgi, .php or whatever you prefer) sign your agent on and off. Cheers, Philipp ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Nufone
crystalstream*CLI -- Executing Macro(SIP/3044-5300, outvoip-2|1800759) in new stack -- Executing SetCIDName(SIP/3044-5300, CRYSTAL STREAM NET|a) in new st ack -- Executing SetCIDNum(SIP/3044-5300, 866xxx|a) in new stack -- Executing Authenticate(SIP/3044-5300, 123987) in new stack -- Playing 'agent-pass' (language 'en') -- Playing 'auth-thankyou' (language 'en') -- Executing Monitor(SIP/3044-5300, wav) in new stack -- Executing Ringing(SIP/3044-5300, ) in new stack -- Executing Wait(SIP/3044-5300, 2) in new stack -- Executing Dial(SIP/3044-5300, IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1800759 ) in new stack -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1800759 Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW Timestamp: 3ms SCall: 1 DCall: 0 [66.225.202.72:4569] VERSION : 2 CALLED NUMBER : 1800759 CALLING NUMBER : 8663113060 LANGUAGE: en USERNAME: username-hidden FORMAT : 4 CAPABILITY : 63502 ADSICPE : 2 DATE TIME : 188966086 Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: AUTHREQ Timestamp: 3ms SCall: 00061 DCall: 1 [66.225.202.72:4569] AUTHMETHODS : 2 CHALLENGE : 150617580 USERNAME: username-hidden Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: AUTHREP Timestamp: 00033ms SCall: 1 DCall: 00061 [66.225.202.72:4569] MD5 RESULT : c8214533976d4dec8b233543dac0eaac Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 002 Type: IAX Subclass: ACCEPT Timestamp: 00036ms SCall: 00061 DCall: 1 [66.225.202.72:4569] FORMAT : 4 -- Call accepted by 66.225.202.72 (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 002 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 00036ms SCall: 1 DCall: 00061 [66.225.202.72:4569] Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 002 Type: VOICE Subclass: 4 Timestamp: 00060ms SCall: 1 DCall: 00061 [66.225.202.72:4569] Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 002 Type: VOICE Subclass: 4 Timestamp: 00080ms SCall: 00061 DCall: 1 [66.225.202.72:4569] Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 003 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 00080ms SCall: 1 DCall: 00061 [66.225.202.72:4569] Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 003 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 00060ms SCall: 00061 DCall: 1 [66.225.202.72:4569] Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 003 Type: CONTROL Subclass: (15?) Timestamp: 00123ms SCall: 00061 DCall: 1 [66.225.202.72:4569] Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 004 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 00123ms SCall: 1 DCall: 00061 [66.225.202.72:4569] Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 004 ISeqno: 003 Type: CONTROL Subclass: (14?) Timestamp: 01423ms SCall: 00061 DCall: 1 [66.225.202.72:4569] Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 005 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 01423ms SCall: 1 DCall: 00061 [66.225.202.72:4569] -- IAX2/NuFone/1 is making progress passing it to SIP/3044-5300 Oct 3 12:38:19 WARNING[49584]: app_dial.c:372 wait_for_answer: Unable to forwar d frame -- Hungup 'IAX2/NuFone/1' == Spawn extension (macro-outvoip-2, s, 7) exited non-zero on 'SIP/3044-5300' in macro 'outvoip-2' == Spawn extension (crystal-sip, 8800759, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/3044- 5300' --- Tom Vile [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how many digits is your callerid passing to the trunk? I am seeing 11 8663xx3 is that correct? I had an issue last week with passing to many digits to my provider and the call would hang up immediately. You could also turn debugging on for this so we can get a better log. iax2 debug peer nufone On 10/3/05, Crystal Stream, Incorporated [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After -- IAX2/NuFone/3 is making progress passing it to SIP/3044-bcd0 I'm getting a Busy tone and it's not even connecting the call. -- Executing Macro(SIP/3044-bcd0, outvoip-2|1800759) in new stack -- Executing SetCIDName(SIP/3044-bcd0, X X X|a) in new stack -- Executing SetCIDNum(SIP/3044-bcd0, 8663xx3|a) in new stack -- Executing Authenticate(SIP/3044-bcd0, xx) in new stack -- Playing 'agent-pass' (language 'en') -- Playing 'auth-thankyou' (language 'en') -- Executing Monitor(SIP/3044-bcd0, wav) in new stack -- Executing Ringing(SIP/3044-bcd0, ) in new stack -- Executing Wait(SIP/3044-bcd0, 2) in new stack -- Executing Dial(SIP/3044-bcd0, IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1800759) in new stack -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1800759 -- Call accepted by 66.225.202.72 http://66.225.202.72 (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw -- IAX2/NuFone/3 is making progress passing it to SIP/3044-bcd0 -- Hungup 'IAX2/NuFone/3' == Spawn extension (macro-outvoip-2, s, 7) exited non-zero on 'SIP/3044-bcd0'
[Asterisk-Users] Which hardware configuration? How would this work?
Hello Everyone, Please accept my appologies - I've been reading through the handbook and the online documentation / mailing list archives and can't quite get my own answer to these inquiries... The biggest mystery is how the existing handsets are connected to a new machine running Asterisk. Background: - The phone system we have is horribly out of date and may pack-it-in any day now. - Existing PBX system (AltiReach running on NT4) but we plan on replacing this server entirely and ditching the old PCI cards but keeping the hand sets (approximately 30 Nortel hand sets). - We have 12 regular phone lines coming into this system - We have satelite offices that could be VOIP after the system is implemented. What is the best hardware configuration for this? Should we get a T1? Which cards/hardware should we use? We are currently unclear on how the hand sets connect to the system but moderately clear on how the phone lines would connect to the box. Some information sources or direct examples of how to switch from a 30 handset office to an Asterisk system would be awesome. Once we replace our current setup we will delve into the extended features/options available. VOIP is probably the most important one after we switch systems entirely. If there is anything else I can provide to help you help me I will reply as soon as possible. -- Landon StewartSuperb Internet Corporation ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] SIP qualify question.
When qualify is set to yes in sip.conf for a friend and the OPTIONS packet gets returned with an ICMP port unreachable message, what is the behavior of Asterisk? It looks to me like Asterisk tries sending the OPTION request again right away (well within a second or two). Some of our devices are being Linux firewalls that make use of iptables to do portforwarding. This generates entries in /proc/net/ip_contrack. From time to time, these entries get out of whack or a connection gets stale and inbound requests start getting rejected with port unreachable messages. In order to get things working again, I need to expire the corresponding entry in ip_conntrack (I have my timeouts set low -- to 15 seconds). The problem is is that Asterisk is sendint the qualify requests so quickly that the timer keeps resetting on my ip_conntrack entry and never expires. I have to either reboot the Linux device to clear the entry manually or block requests from Asterisk for 15 seconds. Then things work fine again. Wondering if there's a good way to make Asterisk back off a little if a SIP OPTIONS request as part of qualify doesn't get through. I suppose modifying the source code is our best bet. Setting qualify to a milliseconds value doesn't appear to affect these retransmits btw. Thanks! ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Hangup not detected on callback
Hi, I'm trying to set up a call-back system using auto-dialout files. I want the call to be terminated when a specific timeout (defined in the .call file) is detected. Both parties should then be hangup. The problem is that the timeout is never detected... How to solve this? Thank you, Pierre .call file -- Channel: IAX2/:@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/01 Callerid: 1 MaxRetries: 5 RetryTime: 60 WaitTime: 30 Context: test Extension: 02 Priority: 1 SetVar: ato=30 SetVar: act=testaccount extensions.conf --- [test] exten = _XX,1,SetAccount(${act}) exten = _XX,2,AbsoluteTimeout(${ato}) exten = _XX,3,Answer() exten = _XX,4,Dial(IAX2/:@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/${EXTEN}) exten = _XX,5,Congestion() exten = _XX,102,Busy() exten = s,1,DigitTimeout,10 exten = s,2,ResponseTimeout,10 exten = t,1,Playback(vm-goodbye) exten = t,2,Hangup exten = T,1,Playback(vm-goodbye) exten = T,2,Hangup CLI output -- -- Attempting call on IAX2/:@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/01 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 (Retry 1) -- Call accepted by xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw Channel IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/1 was answered. -- Executing SetAccount(IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/1, testaccount) in new stack -- Executing AbsoluteTimeout(IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/1, 30) in new stack -- Set Absolute Timeout to 30 -- Executing Answer(IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/1, ) in new stack -- Executing Dial(IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/1, IAX2/:@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/02) in new stack -- Called :@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/02 -- Call accepted by xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw -- IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/2 is ringing -- IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/2 stopped sounds -- IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/2 answered IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/1 -- Attempting native bridge of IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/1 and IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/2 -- Channel 'IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/2' ready to transfer -- Channel 'IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/1' ready to transfer -- Releasing IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/1 and IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/2 -- Hungup 'IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/2' == Spawn extension (test, 02, 4) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/1' Oct 3 19:14:04 NOTICE[1041]: chan_iax2.c:1378 iax2_destroy: Avoiding IAX destroy deadlock -- Hungup 'IAX2/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:4569/1' Oct 3 19:14:04 NOTICE[1092]: pbx_spool.c:242 attempt_thread: Call completed to IAX2/:@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/01 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Need help with Cisco 7960
Hi all, Does anyone know if it is possible to disable the pound key on the 7960 to not place calls so that other services can be used in Asterisk, such as call forwarding. Any info is apreciated, many thanks! ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-841 Decode Latency?
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-841 Decode Latency? Luki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone have any familiarity with decode latency, specifically with Sipura devices? Why would it take 200+ms to decode a 20ms RTP packet? G.711u has existed for over 30 years, how hard could it be? Although I have never seem the decode latency to go above 30 ms on a LAN, it does go up to 80 ms if the Sipura device (phone or ATA) is connected via an Internet link which has jitter. So I don't know for sure, but my understanding is that it's the delay from the arrival of the packet until it's played; this is not due to the actual decoding but probably mostly due to the jitter buffer in the device, which is adjusted dynamically depending on the traffic conditions. More jitter = larger buffer to try to compensate for late packets rather than considering them lost. Anyone correct me if I'm wrong here. Having said that, I don't notice the delay or distorted voice even if the decode latency is as high as 80 ms. Not sure about 200+ ms, but it seems rather high and would imply to me that you have a connectivity issue somewhere on your LAN. The explanation of jitter adding to decode latency sounds reasonable. However, as I said before, I have never seen jitter go above 5ms even when our decode latency spirals out of control. Our latency is under 1ms, generally. It's 100 base T fully switched, and not highly utilized, with 2 switches between the phone and the PBX. Our current working theory, which we will test soon, is that this may be caused by periodic high levels of ARP broadcast traffic. I'm not familiar with the hardware of these phones, and for most ethernet devices they should ignore ARP with no performance effects. But if the SPA-841 is set up in such a way that it eats CPU for the phone to discard ARP packets, then this could be a problem for us. I'll keep you posted on what we find. If anyone has any insight into the networking hardware the SPA-841 uses, I'd be interested in that. Thanks, Alan Ferrency pair Networks, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Compiling SpanDSP
Has anybody been successful with compiling the pre3 version of SpanDSP on the current Asterisk CVS? I'm getting: app_rxfax.c: In function `phase_e_handler': app_rxfax.c:77: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_get_transfer_statistics' app_rxfax.c:78: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_get_far_ident' app_rxfax.c:79: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_get_local_ident' app_rxfax.c:93: error: structure has no member named `callerid' app_rxfax.c: In function `rxfax_exec': app_rxfax.c:263: warning: passing arg 1 of `fax_init' from incompatible pointer type app_rxfax.c:264: error: structure has no member named `verbose' app_rxfax.c:267: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_set_local_ident' app_rxfax.c:270: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_set_header_info' app_rxfax.c:271: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_set_rx_file' app_rxfax.c:273: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_set_phase_d_handler' app_rxfax.c:274: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_set_phase_e_handler' app_rxfax.c:285: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_rx_process' app_rxfax.c:288: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_tx_process' app_rxfax.c:325: warning: passing arg 1 of `fax_release' from incompatible pointer type app_rxfax.c: At top level: app_rxfax.c:61: warning: 't30_flush' defined but not used make[1]: *** [app_rxfax.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/doug/cvs/10032005/asterisk/apps' make: *** [subdirs] Error 1 Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Nufone
Where is it getting the extra 8 from? It seems like you are passing an invalid number to the trunk. Spawn extension (crystal-sip, 8800759, 1)On 10/3/05, Crystal Stream, Incorporated [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: crystalstream*CLI-- Executing Macro(SIP/3044-5300,outvoip-2|1800759) in new stack-- Executing SetCIDName(SIP/3044-5300, CRYSTALSTREAM NET|a) in new st ack -- Executing SetCIDNum(SIP/3044-5300,866xxx|a) in new stack-- Executing Authenticate(SIP/3044-5300,123987) in new stack-- Playing 'agent-pass' (language 'en') -- Playing 'auth-thankyou' (language 'en')-- Executing Monitor(SIP/3044-5300, wav) innew stack-- Executing Ringing(SIP/3044-5300, ) in newstack -- Executing Wait(SIP/3044-5300, 2) in newstack-- Executing Dial(SIP/3044-5300,IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1800759 ) in newstack-- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1800759Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type:IAX Subclass: NEW Timestamp: 3msSCall: 1DCall: 0[66.225.202.72:4569 ] VERSION : 2 CALLED NUMBER : 1800759 CALLING NUMBER: 8663113060 LANGUAGE: en USERNAME: username-hidden FORMAT: 4 CAPABILITY: 63502 ADSICPE : 2 DATE TIME : 188966086Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type:IAX Subclass: AUTHREQ Timestamp: 3msSCall: 00061DCall: 1[ 66.225.202.72:4569] AUTHMETHODS : 2 CHALLENGE : 150617580 USERNAME: username-hiddenTx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type:IAX Subclass: AUTHREP Timestamp: 00033msSCall: 1DCall: 00061 [66.225.202.72:4569] MD5 RESULT: c8214533976d4dec8b233543dac0eaacRx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 002 Type:IAX Subclass: ACCEPT Timestamp: 00036msSCall: 00061DCall: 1 [66.225.202.72:4569] FORMAT: 4-- Call accepted by 66.225.202.72 (format ulaw)-- Format for call is ulaw Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 002 Type:IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 00036msSCall: 1DCall: 00061[66.225.202.72:4569]Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 002 Type: VOICE Subclass: 4 Timestamp: 00060msSCall: 1DCall: 00061[66.225.202.72:4569]Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 002 Type:VOICE Subclass: 4 Timestamp: 00080msSCall: 00061DCall: 1[66.225.202.72:4569]Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 003 Type:IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 00080msSCall: 1DCall: 00061 [66.225.202.72:4569]Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 002 ISeqno: 003 Type:IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 00060msSCall: 00061DCall: 1[ 66.225.202.72:4569]Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 003 Type:CONTROL Subclass: (15?) Timestamp: 00123msSCall: 00061DCall: 1[66.225.202.72:4569 ]Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 004 Type:IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 00123msSCall: 1DCall: 00061[66.225.202.72:4569]Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 004 ISeqno: 003 Type: CONTROL Subclass: (14?) Timestamp: 01423msSCall: 00061DCall: 1[66.225.202.72:4569]Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 003 ISeqno: 005 Type:IAX Subclass: ACK Timestamp: 01423msSCall: 1DCall: 00061[66.225.202.72:4569]-- IAX2/NuFone/1 is making progress passing it toSIP/3044-5300Oct3 12:38:19 WARNING[49584]: app_dial.c:372 wait_for_answer: Unable to forwar d frame-- Hungup 'IAX2/NuFone/1'== Spawn extension (macro-outvoip-2, s, 7) exitednon-zero on 'SIP/3044-5300' in macro 'outvoip-2'== Spawn extension (crystal-sip, 8800759, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/3044- 5300'--- Tom Vile [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how many digits is your callerid passing to the trunk? I am seeing 11 8663xx3 is that correct? I had an issue last week with passing to many digits to my provider and the call would hang up immediately. You could also turn debugging on for this so we can get a better log. iax2 debug peer nufone On 10/3/05, Crystal Stream, Incorporated [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After -- IAX2/NuFone/3 is making progress passing it to SIP/3044-bcd0 I'm getting a Busy tone and it's not even connecting the call. -- Executing Macro(SIP/3044-bcd0, outvoip-2|1800759) in new stack -- Executing SetCIDName(SIP/3044-bcd0, X X X|a) in new stack -- Executing SetCIDNum(SIP/3044-bcd0, 8663xx3|a) in new stack -- Executing Authenticate(SIP/3044-bcd0, xx) in new stack -- Playing 'agent-pass' (language 'en') -- Playing 'auth-thankyou' (language 'en') -- Executing Monitor(SIP/3044-bcd0, wav) in new stack -- Executing Ringing(SIP/3044-bcd0, ) in new stack -- Executing Wait(SIP/3044-bcd0, 2) in new stack -- Executing Dial(SIP/3044-bcd0, IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1800759) in new stack -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1800759 -- Call accepted by 66.225.202.72 http://66.225.202.72 (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw -- IAX2/NuFone/3 is making progress passing it to SIP/3044-bcd0 -- Hungup 'IAX2/NuFone/3' == Spawn extension (macro-outvoip-2, s, 7) exited non-zero on 'SIP/3044-bcd0' in macro 'outvoip-2' == Spawn extension (crystal-sip, 8800759, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/3044-bcd0' x*CLI iax2 show peers Name/Username Host Mask Port Status voicepulse2/Fbg 66.234.228.166
[Asterisk-Users] Console sound output -- shuts off when call from console answered
I've got a problem with audio output from the Asterisk console. I'd really appreciate any help. I'm simply trying to dial out to a phone on PSTN. My extensions.conf entry is as follows: exten = _1NXXNXX,1,Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/${EXTEN})exten = _1NXXNXX,2,HangupAfter starting asterisk and dialing, I hear a ringback tone through the console speaker, and the PSTN phone rings. 1) If I answer the phone, asterisk indicates the call has been answered, says something about stopping sounds, and the console speaker cuts out. I am only able to speak through the console mic and hear this speech on the PSTN phone. After hanging up, if I try dialing again, I no longer hear any ringback tones -- basically it seems that the console speaker has been shut off. 2) If I don't answer the phone, and hangup the call from the console, I can continue to dial out and here ringback output on the console speaker. Please, I'd really appreciate any advice. I'm assuming this is an Asterisk issue has I've had no other problems with my ALSA/JACK config. Below is sample verbose output from the console: ___*CLI dial [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Executing Dial("ALSA/default", IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/1###|) in new stack -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1## -- Call accepted by 66.246.246.52 (format ulaw) -- Format for call is ulaw -- IAX2/voxee-1 is making progress passing it to ALSA/defaultOct 2 14:44:04 WARNING[3750]: chan_alsa.c:751 alsa_indicate: Don't know how to display condition 14 on ALSA/default -- IAX2/voxee-1 is ringing -- IAX2/voxee-1 stopped sounds -- IAX2/voxee-1 answered ALSA/default Console call has been answered -- Hungup 'IAX2/voxee-1' == Spawn extension (voxee, 1##, 3) exited non-zero on 'ALSA/default' Hangup on console ___CLI Yahoo! for Good Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compiling SpanDSP
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 14:10 -0400, Doug Lytle wrote: Has anybody been successful with compiling the pre3 version of SpanDSP on the current Asterisk CVS? I'm getting: app_rxfax.c: In function `phase_e_handler': app_rxfax.c:77: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_get_transfer_statistics' app_rxfax.c:78: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_get_far_ident' app_rxfax.c:79: warning: implicit declaration of function `fax_get_local_ident' app_rxfax.c:93: error: structure has no member named `callerid' Look at rxfax.c around line 88 there's an #if statement remove the references to callerid. This error has been around for a while. -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.8 and TDM stop acking inbound calls?
My office has been running Asterisk 1.0.8 and a TDM04B for a few months now without too much trouble. After a while we discovered that after a certain period (about a month), asterisk stopped acknowledging inbound calls. Since I was out of the office the first time it happened, another admin rebooted the whole box which solved the problem. The second time it happened I discovered that just restarting gracefully solved the problem, so I put that into my cron and forgot about it. (I know, it's not right, but debugging something that happens unpredictably once a month could go on for way too long to be acceptable..) Now, less than a week since I did that, asterisk stopped ringing our extensions on inbound calls again. sip show peers showed that asterisk knew about all of the extensions. I forgot to check zap show channels when * was ignoring inbound calls, is it possible that * thinks all the lines are still off hook? Is there anything else I should do to figure out what's causing trouble? Unfortunately it's usually something of a panic situation, so I'm not allowed the chance to troubleshoot as thoroughly as I'd like. Speaking of, I've fiddled and tweaked left and right to get hangup detection working better to no real avail. Asterisk eventually decides the far side hung up about 10 seconds after the fact. Am I understanding right that call progress is still something of a black art for analog FXO devices? Not getting 10 second dead air voicemails when people hang up would be sweet. :) I couldn't find a changelog for 1.0.9 to see if it's worth the off-hours maintenance window, and we're too dependant on the phones to try 1.2. Should I try the next step up in the probably unnecessary preventative maintenance and unload/reload the wctdm module during the asterisk restart? Is there any way to have asterisk notify that it's running low on/out of resources? We don't typically ever tie up all of our zap channels except for really particularly exciting days, so if they are all in use it would be cause for concern.. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compiling SpanDSP
Dave Cotton wrote: On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 14:10 -0400, Doug Lytle wrote: Look at rxfax.c around line 88 there's an #if statement remove the references to callerid. This error has been around for a while. That took care of the callerid compile error, but not the verbose error: error: structure has no member named `verbose' Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Compiling SpanDSP
I've been getting the same problem with the verbose issue. I just commented out the line, and it seemed to compile OK. -- Tom On 10/3/05, Doug Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave Cotton wrote: On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 14:10 -0400, Doug Lytle wrote: Look at rxfax.c around line 88 there's an #if statement remove the references to callerid. This error has been around for a while. That took care of the callerid compile error, but not the verbose error: error: structure has no member named `verbose' Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Tom ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Adding Cepstral to Asterisk
Wojciech Tryc wrote: I am not following... Why would you need to integrate Cepstral directly into Asterisk? Just to be able to call it as Asterisk app from your dialplan? I am running Cepstral and calling it through the System call. You could try the howto located here: http://www.oldskoolphreak.com/tfiles/voip/installing_app_cepstral.txt for cepstral integration into asterisk. It makes it app_cepstral, instead of using system calls. Mat ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.8 and TDM stop acking inbound calls?
Patrick Friedel wrote: I couldn't find a changelog for 1.0.9 to see if it's worth the off-hours maintenance window, and we're too dependant on the phones to try 1.2. Should I try the next step up in the probably unnecessary preventative maintenance and unload/reload the wctdm module during the asterisk restart? Is there any way to have asterisk notify that it's running low on/out of resources? We don't typically ever tie up all of our zap channels except for really particularly exciting days, so if they are all in use it would be cause for concern.. In the interim, and completely on a whim, I've put a couple of splitters and added another FXO device onto the line, a good old fashioned analog phone that chirps once until asterisk picks up the line. With any luck, the next time asterisk takes a dive, that phone will continue to ring and we'll catch on faster than the first customer that decides to email us wondering why nobody is picking up. :) ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Real Life FAX sending receiving
is it possible to achive the following scenario? faxmachine--tdm40bFXS--SIPnetwork--Gateway--faxmachine i have found a lot of documents about asterisk receiving a fax and saving it to a file. But i want to receive the fax via SIP and send it to my faxmachine. I also want to send a fax from my faxmachine through the digium card, so asterisk should send the fax via SIP to the gateway, which also has a faxmachine connected. is this possible? would anyone be so kind to send me the config files or config tips? thanks a lot guys ;) Jenna. ___ 1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo http://correo.yahoo.com.ar ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Problem with configuration of Quintum AX with Asterisk
Hi. I'm trying to configurate Quintum AX to work with Asterisk SIP egister/Proxy server and my problem is that only the first user account get logged in and only that user is able to make call correctly. It seems to be a problem with authorization - I have noticed no Proxy-Authorization information in SIP INVITE, ACK, CANCEL messages. I have also noticed that when I remove secret from Asterisk sip.conf file (no authorization required) other users (accounts) can make a call but no media are sent. Do you know reasons of this problem and can you help me resolving it. Michał Misiak -- Have a nice day! phone: (+48 22) 4330419 mobile: (+48) 888 395 336 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] homepage: www.michalmisiak.prv.pl ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Real Life FAX sending receiving
Jenna Cole wrote: receive the fax via SIP and send it to my faxmachine. I also want to send a fax from my faxmachine through the digium card, so asterisk should send the fax via SIP to the gateway, which also has a faxmachine connected. is this possible? Short answer, no. Long answer can be found here: http://www.soft-switch.org/spandsp_faq/ar01s04.html Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0.8 and TDM stop acking inbound calls?
My office has been running Asterisk 1.0.8 and a TDM04B for a few months now without too much trouble. After a while we discovered that after a certain period (about a month), asterisk stopped acknowledging inbound calls. Since I was out of the office the first time it happened, another admin rebooted the whole box which solved the problem. The second time it happened I discovered that just restarting gracefully solved the problem, so I put that into my cron and forgot about it. (I know, it's not right, but debugging something that happens unpredictably once a month could go on for way too long to be acceptable..) Now, less than a week since I did that, asterisk stopped ringing our extensions on inbound calls again. sip show peers showed that asterisk knew about all of the extensions. I forgot to check zap show channels when * was ignoring inbound calls, is it possible that * thinks all the lines are still off hook? Is there anything else I should do to figure out what's causing trouble? Unfortunately it's usually something of a panic situation, so I'm not allowed the chance to troubleshoot as thoroughly as I'd like. Speaking of, I've fiddled and tweaked left and right to get hangup detection working better to no real avail. Asterisk eventually decides the far side hung up about 10 seconds after the fact. Am I understanding right that call progress is still something of a black art for analog FXO devices? Not getting 10 second dead air voicemails when people hang up would be sweet. :) I couldn't find a changelog for 1.0.9 to see if it's worth the off-hours maintenance window, and we're too dependant on the phones to try 1.2. Should I try the next step up in the probably unnecessary preventative maintenance and unload/reload the wctdm module during the asterisk restart? Is there any way to have asterisk notify that it's running low on/out of resources? We don't typically ever tie up all of our zap channels except for really particularly exciting days, so if they are all in use it would be cause for concern.. Check the revision of the TDM card. If rev E/F, call digium support to get it replaced. Known problem with early versions of the card. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Ignoring [User] in SIP.CONF
Hi, I have a SIP.CONF with a user section like this:- [1234] accountcode=HABITAZ type=friend callerid=HABITAZ/1234 context=milkshake userName=1234 secret=1234 host=dynamic dtmfmode=rfc2833 qualify=yes callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 canreinvite=no When I login from a X-Lite phone, with Username, Authentication User and Password set to '1234', everything works fine. The account code is set to 'HABITAZ' and everything seems fine. But when the Username on X-Lite is changed to pretty much anything else, eg. '4321' - and the Authentication User and Password left to be '1234', Asterisk still allows calls to be made from the phone, but the CDR countains a blank accountcode. How can I disallow login if the Username field on X-Lite is not set to a valid user section in SIP.conf? Andre ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Adding Cepstral to Asterisk
the app_cepstral.c file had a problem that it was trying use #include ../asterisk.h I had to force it to where asterisk.h was located... in my case it was in /usr/src/asterisk/include so i changed the #include to say #include /usr/src/asterisk/include/asterisk.h and then it would compile through with no problems Wojciech Tryc wrote: I am not following... Why would you need to integrate Cepstral directly into Asterisk? Just to be able to call it as Asterisk app from your dialplan? I am running Cepstral and calling it through the System call. You could try the howto located here: http://www.oldskoolphreak.com/tfiles/voip/installing_app_cepstral.txt for cepstral integration into asterisk. It makes it app_cepstral, instead of using system calls. Mat ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
Olle, Thanks for looking into it. In doing some ngrep work I figured out where my problem is. Acutal error from the 79xx inside the SIP header is: Warning: 399 Bad Request - 'Malformed/Missing FROM: field' From looks like this: From: Sales Queue sip:12345... Those double-quotes looked bad, so I assumed that the problem was related to this: Set(CALLERID(name)=Sales Queue) that executes before the offending queue. I changed to: Set(CALLERID(name)=Sales) and no success. then to: Set(CALLERID(name)=Sales) and it's OK. Am I just using the Set() command wrong? It seems pretty counter-intuitive not to enclose multi-word strings in quotes but if that's the problem let me know. FYI, we're testing with (right now) CVS-Nv1-2-0-beta1-10/01/05-20:43:03 SIP Firmware on the phone is 7.4. -Corey On Sun, 2 Oct 2005, Olle E. Johansson wrote: Doug Lytle wrote: Olle E. Johansson wrote: Corey S. McFadden wrote: Here's the CLI output: -- Got SIP response 400 Bad Request back from 192.168.249.94 -- SIP/502-9a58 is circuit-busy I've tried a few different Asterisk versions CVS-HEAD, stable, even 1.2 beta. I've also bounced between SIP firmware 7.4 and 7.5 on the 7960/7940 phones. As of Friday evening, we've been seeing this on our system as well. Olle, do you want debugs from other people as well, or will the one you've requested be enough? Just make sure I get one. If I can't figure that one out, I might need more. Thank you for asking. The first one in my mailbox tomorrow morning (it's late in Sweden) will get my attention :-) I need to know version of Asterisk as well. As we are getting very close to release, it's important for us to track down and resolve all outstanding bugs as quickly as possible. The SIP channel has been changing quite a lot during the last two months, so there are a lot of new code in there right now. Thank you for your assistance! /O ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users * This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. * This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] sip phones on x86_64
Hi all Can anyone recommend a good soft phone that can compile on x86_64 (linux) platform? -- Regards Wayne Gemmell Tel Fax: (011) 894-4081 Cell : 072 836 4325 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Adding Cepstral to Asterisk
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 13:02 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the app_cepstral.c file had a problem that it was trying use #include ../asterisk.h I had to force it to where asterisk.h was located... in my case it was in /usr/src/asterisk/include so i changed the #include to say #include /usr/src/asterisk/include/asterisk.h and then it would compile through with no problems try adding -I/path/to/asterisk/includes in your case -I/usr/src/asterisk/include to your cc/gcc line (in Makefile usually CCOPTS var, but I havent looked at that Makefile specifically). This is the more elegant solution :P Or install your asterisk includes in the system default (/usr/include normally) -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Corey S. McFadden wrote: Am I just using the Set() command wrong? It seems pretty counter-intuitive not to enclose multi-word strings in quotes but if that's the problem let me know. Yeah, that's the problem. Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP-CPE Gateway
Just to clarify. These products are not produced by this company, its Taiwanese brands. The SIP-CPE Gateway is a rebranded VodTel MOSA 3700 Anders -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Michaelson Sent: den 3 oktober 2005 18:12 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] SIP-CPE Gateway Has anyone used the GSM-SIP gateway product produced by a company at sipcpe.com? Any comments? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] What does the error stale nonce' mean?
On 10/3/05, Olle E. Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know what "stale nonce" is?I've answered this question many times, so you should be able to find the answer...A stale nonce is when a device tries to re-authenticate with a noncethat is no longer valid. We are telling them that the nonce they used isinvalid, and re-issue a new challenge and a fresh nonce. It's just an informative message, that I propably should move away to a debug levelof some kind. I get this error when I use a Audiocodes MP-124 against Asterisk 1.2beta1 and asterisk refuses the call. When I useCVS-D2005.02.12.14.37.11-04/13/05-16:14:03 it works fine. I do not have access to the debug and log file now, but I will send them tomorrow. /Morten ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] sip phones on x86_64
Once upon a time Monday 03 October 2005 3:11 pm, Wayne Gemmell wrote: Hi all Can anyone recommend a good soft phone that can compile on x86_64 (linux) platform? kphone compiles and is available in Fedora extras and im sure is available for other distros. If you want to get adventurous you could try cvs gnomemeeting. it also has sip support. Dennsi pgppMjCE15oYb.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on windows
Matt wrote: Extremely good point... I myself am a Linux person, but manage several Windows machines (several meaning 25 or so). There is definately a time and place for Windows.. I'm just not sure a real-time-VoIP server is the time or place.Being semi-half serious about the GUI there also.You install X on your Asterisk server and things will not be happy either. I Run SuSE 9.3 with KDE 3.4, Asterisk 1.0.3, play MP3's and OGG's, SAMBA services, HTTPD, VNC, MicroWindows, FTP, SMTP, POP, IMAP, plus others. I dont see that the GUI slows things down to much, unless I am running a test and gring the call volume over 500 active calls. (I am developing a new channel driver for * ment for inclusion in mobile phones, think Asterisk+Cell Phone). The assertion that a GUI will bring a system to it's knee's is utter CRAP! It all has to do whith what the system is doing besides, and what the hardware can handle. BTW: the system this all is running on is an AMD 1700+, and the same system that I am using to brows the mailing list. --Christopher Dobbs --I think I think, There for I think I am. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] What does the error stale nonce' mean?
A stale nonce is more of a warning than an error. In SIP your authorization credentials are encoded in the SIP headers. To prevent people from capturing that data and using it later to make calls on your account a nonce is used. A nonce is a disposable number that is added to the string a hash algorithm will hash. This makes hashing algorithms (like md5) have different output. This is a common cryptography technique. The SIP RFC requires that the nonce randomly change periodically. If the client uses a nonce that was expired it is considered a 'stale nonce'. The client should then get the current nonce and use that instead. This message lets you know that the client tried to use a stale nonce, which can indicate someone trying a replay attack (using captured data from a previous session) or a client that isnt properly getting the new nonce, or even just timing issues as follows: Client gets a nonce. Client goes to register/reregister using that nonce At the same time the client is preparing the message to register/reregister the server chooses a new nonce Client sends the message with the now old nonce Then again it could be something else entirely :) On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 22:35 +0200, Morten Isaksen wrote: On 10/3/05, Olle E. Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know what stale nonce is? I've answered this question many times, so you should be able to find the answer... A stale nonce is when a device tries to re-authenticate with a nonce that is no longer valid. We are telling them that the nonce they used is invalid, and re-issue a new challenge and a fresh nonce. It's just an informative message, that I propably should move away to a debug level of some kind. I get this error when I use a Audiocodes MP-124 against Asterisk 1.2beta1 and asterisk refuses the call. When I use CVS-D2005.02.12.14.37.11-04/13/05-16:14:03 it works fine. I do not have access to the debug and log file now, but I will send them tomorrow. /Morten ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com Bret McDanel UK +44 870 340 4605 Germany +49 801 777 555 3402 US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200 FreeWorldDialup: 635378 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Corey S. McFadden wrote: Am I just using the Set() command wrong? It seems pretty counter-intuitive not to enclose multi-word strings in quotes but if that's the problem let me know. Yeah, that's the problem. Steve In my case, I'm not using quotes: exten = s,3,Set(CALLERID(Name)=${CALLERID}) exten = s,4,Set(CALLERID(Number)=${CALLERIDNUM}) Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] suse 9.3 pro asterisk install from source problem
On 10/3/05, ashley wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Can any one help I'm trying to install asterisk on suse 9.3 pro from cvs release v1_0 version 1.0.9 and when I try to make from the asterisk directory I get the following error. Is there anybody that could give me a pointer as to what the issue may be? I suspect your problem is related to not having all of the pre-requisites. I just installed over the weekend the latest beta version of zaptel/libpri/asterisk from source on SUSE oss 10.0 rc1. I had also installed from source on 9.1 and v 1.06 on 9.3. They all worked if all the pre-requisites are in place. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on windows
Christopher Dobbs wrote: Matt wrote: Extremely good point... I myself am a Linux person, but manage several Windows machines (several meaning 25 or so). There is definately a time and place for Windows.. I'm just not sure a real-time-VoIP server is the time or place.Being semi-half serious about the GUI there also.You install X on your Asterisk server and things will not be happy either. I Run SuSE 9.3 with KDE 3.4, Asterisk 1.0.3, play MP3's and OGG's, SAMBA services, HTTPD, VNC, MicroWindows, FTP, SMTP, POP, IMAP, plus others. I dont see that the GUI slows things down to much, unless I am running a test and gring the call volume over 500 active calls. (I am developing a new channel driver for * ment for inclusion in mobile phones, think Asterisk+Cell Phone). The assertion that a GUI will bring a system to it's knee's is utter CRAP! It all has to do whith what the system is doing besides, and what the hardware can handle. BTW: the system this all is running on is an AMD 1700+, and the same system that I am using to brows the mailing list. Agreed. The gui is only one part of the windows performance problem. Also, there are differences between XP home, XP Pro and the windows server products. Anybody porting a real-time app to windows should understand those differences in advance. As for X on the same box as *, it only seems to affect calls when I do something that uses enough cpu. I can be logged in with a gnome or kde desktop without causing problems. It's a P4 2.4 with 1 gb DDR 333. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP 400 Bad Request from Cisco 7960/7940
Steve, I'm glad to know what the problem is. We're back to normal now. FWIW, this was working up until about a week and a half ago and didn't affect our non-Cisco phones... I'm not sure what component (Asterisk, chan_sip, 79xx firmware, etc.) became less tolerant of the error between then and now but I hope it's not indicative of a larger issue. Thanks again, -Corey Am I just using the Set() command wrong? It seems pretty counter-intuitive not to enclose multi-word strings in quotes but if that's the problem let me know. Yeah, that's the problem. Steve * This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] setting up asterisk as an sms central?
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk ha scritto: hi is it possible to use asterisk as an sms central to send SMSes directly to clients on PSTN instead of just communicating with a central? the telco to which we're currently connected doesn't have a central Yes, as far as you can spoof the Caller ID ;) The trick is that PSTN clients decide whether an incoming call is a SMS or not *before* answering, by looking at the Caller ID, and they are usually pre-programmed with the SMSC's phone number. (At least, that's valid for the SMS-capable analog cordless phones I've seen till now.) So, that's going to be a problem, unless your telco is willing to help you at least in that respect, and let you send a valid SMSC's phone number as caller ID. (Of course I haven't tried this across the public network, but I'd be ready to bet one or even two beers that it works!) Bye, -- Emanuele ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] TDM400P recognised as Network controller: Unknown device
Hello everybody,I have been googling for hours and also searchedon http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk, but I still can not find anyinformation for the problem I have. SoI hope one of you could help me out.I have actually very little experience in Asterisk and also Linux. But by following installation guide, luckily I could get asterisk working. That is only with SIP and IAX channels though, no zaptel installed. As I wanted to explore more, I bought a TDM400P development kit (TDM11B) from an authorised Asterisk reseller in Germany. After I updated my Asterisk (make update) and installed zaptel last week (27 Sep 2005), here is what I got:# lspci -v01:05.0 Network controller: Unknown device e159:0001 Subsystem: Unknown device b119:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 100, IRQ 209 I/O ports at 2400 [size=256] Memory at efffe000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2# dmesgModule 0: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPOModule 1: Not installedModule 2: Not installedModule 3: Installed -- AUTO FXO (FCC mode)Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV I (2 modules) Both LEDs of the FXO and FXS modules are illuminated. I guess that is a normal state.Is the status of "Unknown device" a normal status?From what you have experienced, is there any issue with revision I? I know that there are problems on the cards with revision E or F, so I don't want to waste my time trying to configure the card, which maybe in the end I have to return the card to be replaced as well.Do you think this is just an issue of the driver (zaptel) or something else? Do you have any hints on what should be changed or modified?I sent an email to Digium support and got only a reply like this:"Although the card is being shown as an 'Unknown Device', it should still work properly."To be honest, I am not happy with that answer.FYI, I have installed Asterisk (CVS HEAD - 27 Sep 2005) on IBM xSeries 330 (8654-51Y) running Fedora Core 4 (kernel 2.6.12-1). Thanks in advance for youranswers.Kind regards,Anto ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] UPDATE - 512 Calls w/ Dig Rec: NFS Setup and Benchmarks
List members, My previous post SUCCESS - 512 Simultaneous Calls with Digital Recording documents using a RAM disk to eliminate the I/O bottleneck associated with digitally recording calls via the Monitor application. By recording directly to a RAM disk I was able to maintain good call quality on 512 simultaneous calls. This post documents moving the calls from the RAM disk to a hard disk on a remote machine via NFS. The setup is not resource intensive on the Asterisk server and should not impact call quality. As always, I welcome suggestions for improvement and the identification of errors and omissions. Asterisk Configuration == The two leg files of a call will be moved immediately after the call is complete via the MONITOR_EXEC and MONITOR_EXEC_ARGS variables. MONITOR_EXEC is generally used to replace soxmix as the application for mixing the raw leg files, but I'm using it as a hook to move them to an NFS mounted drive specified by MONITOR_EXEC_ARGS as follows: -From the dialplan (extensions.conf): exten = _,1,SetVar(MONITOR_EXEC=mvdr) exten = _,2,SetVar(MONITOR_EXEC_ARGS=/digrec-nfs/) exten = _,3,Monitor(pcm||m) mvdr is a shell script sitting in /usr/sbin/: #!/bin/bash /bin/nice -n 19 mv $1 $4 /bin/nice -n 19 mv $2 $4 Digitally recording via Monitor can also be initiated from agent channels and queues. The MONITOR_EXEC and MONITOR_EXEC_ARGS variables are still set from the dialplan, but you must tell Asterisk to mix the files for them to be used. This is accomplished as follows: -Agents: The channels must be configured in agents.conf for recording: recordagentcalls=yes; The leg files are always joined -Queues: Each queue must be configured in queues.conf for recording and joining the leg files: monitor-format=pcm monitor-join=yes Using this hook to trigger the moves of the leg files has two distinct advantages. First, the leg files are removed from the RAM disk as soon as possible, minimizing the amount of RAM needed to buffer the calls. Secondly, the RAM disk is volatile storage so moving the leg files to stable storage as soon as possible minimizes the number of digital recordings that will be lost in the event of an Asterisk server crash. NFS Configuration = A fast NFS connection is needed for two reasons. First, the size of the RAM disk is limited by the amount of physical memory so we have to move data off it as quickly as possible to avoid filling it. Secondly, minimizing the amount of time needed to transmit the leg files prevents a large number of moves from building up on the system. Too many background processes leads to resource consumption which inhibits Asterisk's ability to maintain call quality. To attain the needed speed, I chose asynchronous NFS (version 3) using UDP and 8K block sizes transmitted via a crossover Gigabit connection configured for jumbo frames. The Asterisk server is the NFS client in order to minimize resource consumption, and the Digital Recording server runs the NFS daemons. I decided to use an asynchronous NFS transfer because it allows the NFS server to reply to NFS client requests as soon as it has processed the request, without waiting for the data to be written to disk. This yields better performance at the cost of possible data corruption in the event of an NFS server crash. UDP was chosen because it is a stateless protocol and will not cause the NFS client to hang if the NFS server crashes in the middle of a packet transmission. The Asterisk server (NFS client) uses a soft, interruptable mount to prevent hanging if the Digital Recording server (NFS server) crashes, as well. Jumbo frames are used to minimize the number of CPU interrupts and general proccessing overhead for a given data transfer size. The 8K block sizes (plus packet headers) fit into the 9000 byte MTU allowing for efficient transfers between the NFS client and server without packet fragmentation. nfsd is started at boot on the Digital Recording server (NFS server) in runlevels 3, 4, and 5. Note that throughout the configuration I am sacrificing data integrity at the expense of speed and NFS client reliability. I feel this is an acceptable trade, given the realtime nature of Asterisk and the criticality of speed to this application. This configuration involves hardware and software, so I'll review both. If you would like full copies of any configuration files, please contact me off list. Hardware Profiles - -Asterisk Server (NFS Client) - Machine: Dell PowerEdge 6850 - CPU: Four Intel Xeon MP CPUs at 3.16 GHz - Hyperthreaded - RAM: 20 GB (4 GB System / 16 GB RAM Disk) - NIC: Intel Pro/1000 MT Dual Port Server Adapter - Exp. Slot: PCI-X, 64 bit, 133 MHz -Digital Recording Server (NFS Server) - Machine: Dell PowerEdge 1850 - CPU: One Intel Xeon CPU 2.80 GHz - Hyperthreaded -
[Asterisk-Users] FreeTDS 0.63
Hello, Is anyone using FreeTDS version 0.63 with *? --Richard Cook[EMAIL PROTECTED]T: 705-223-2000 x2010 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Direct Dial In - second try
Hi all, I have an asterisk-server (cvs-head from august) connected to a carrier's switch (DMS/Euroisdn) via a te410p, and I am having problems with DDI (standard 'official pstn' number plus extra digits for 'internal' use) Basically, when the entire number (including the extra digits) is dialled via a redial or a programmed key, I see the entire called party number (including the extra numbers) in * debug. However if I dial the number manually (digit for digit) the carrier puts it through before I've finished dialling (after 10 digits), and I never see the whole DDI dialed. Since I want to be able to use numbers with and without DDIs, I can't tell the carrier to raise the minimum level to more than 10 since numbers dialled without DDIs would never be passed. The carrier is telling me to wait a second or two before seizing the call, and that any additional digits received would be passed in the isdn protocol. My understanding is that the called party number would be retransmitted, including the DDI. (Wait in the dialplan doesn't work, as the call is already taken) Does anyone have any idea why this is not working? Is the carrier right? This doesn't seem to be such an odd feature that nobody else would use it ;-), so please leave a comment, even if it works for you out of the box without fuss. Your help is highly appreciated, thanks! I have included two traces. The first is the number dialled with a speed dial key, the second is exactly the same number dialed manually. Best regards Christian trace: with speeddial(sent as one block): mgw1*CLI Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=35 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 1549/0x60D) (Originator) Message type: SETUP (5) [04 03 80 90 a3] Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Speech (0) Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16) Ext: 1 User information layer 1: A-Law (35) [18 03 a1 83 82] Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Preferred Dchan: 0 ChanSel: Reserved Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 Ext: 1 Channel: 2 ] [6c 02 00 a1] Calling Number (len= 4) [ Ext: 0 TON: Unknown Number Type (0) NPI: Unknown Number Plan (0) Presentation: Presentation prohibited, user number passed network screening (33) '' ] [70 0e a1 30 37 32 30 30 30 33 34 35 36 37 38 39] Called Number (len=16) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '07xx6789' ] -- Making new call for cr 1549 -- Processing Q.931 Call Setup -- Processing IE 4 (cs0, Bearer Capability) -- Processing IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) -- Processing IE 108 (cs0, Calling Party Number) -- Processing IE 112 (cs0, Called Party Number) Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=10 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 1549/0x60D) (Terminator) Message type: CALL PROCEEDING (2) [18 03 a9 83 82] Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Exclusive Dchan: 0 ChanSel: Reserved Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 Ext: 1 Channel: 2 ] -- Accepting call from '' to '07xx6789' on channel 0/2, span 1 -- Executing GotoIf(Zap/2-1, 0?100:2) in new stack snip dialed manually digit by digit: Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=32 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 1543/0x607) (Originator) Message type: SETUP (5) [04 03 80 90 a3] Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Speech (0) Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16) Ext: 1 User information layer 1: A-Law (35) [18 03 a1 83 82] Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Preferred Dchan: 0 ChanSel: Reserved Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 Ext: 1 Channel: 2 ] [6c 02 00 a1] Calling Number (len= 4) [ Ext: 0 TON: Unknown Number Type (0) NPI: Unknown Number Plan (0) Presentation: Presentation prohibited, user number passed network screening (33) '' ] [70 0b a1 30 37 32 30 30 30 33 34 35 36] Called Number (len=13) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '072xx6' ] -- Making new call for cr 1543 -- Processing Q.931 Call Setup -- Processing IE 4 (cs0, Bearer Capability) -- Processing IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) -- Processing IE 108 (cs0, Calling Party Number) -- Processing IE 112 (cs0, Called Party Number) Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=10 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 1543/0x607) (Terminator) Message type:
RE: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P recognised as Network controller: Unknowndevice
All the unknown device means is that your lspci doesnt know what the card is. Thats all. Nothing more. --Rob From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aryanto Rachmad Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2005 7:43 AM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P recognised as Network controller: Unknowndevice Hello everybody, I have been googling for hours and also searchedon http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk, but I still can not find anyinformation for the problem I have. SoI hope one of you could help me out. I have actually very little experience in Asterisk and also Linux. But by following installation guide, luckily I could get asterisk working. That is only with SIP and IAX channels though, no zaptel installed. As I wanted to explore more, I bought a TDM400P development kit (TDM11B) from an authorised Asterisk reseller in Germany. After I updated my Asterisk (make update) and installed zaptel last week (27 Sep 2005), here is what I got: # lspci -v 01:05.0 Network controller: Unknown device e159:0001 Subsystem: Unknown device b119:0001 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 100, IRQ 209 I/O ports at 2400 [size=256] Memory at efffe000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2 # dmesg Module 0: Installed -- AUTO FXS/DPO Module 1: Not installed Module 2: Not installed Module 3: Installed -- AUTO FXO (FCC mode) Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV I (2 modules) Both LEDs of the FXO and FXS modules are illuminated. I guess that is a normal state. Is the status of Unknown device a normal status? >From what you have experienced, is there any issue with revision I? I know that there are problems on the cards with revision E or F, so I don't want to waste my time trying to configure the card, which maybe in the end I have to return the card to be replaced as well. Do you think this is just an issue of the driver (zaptel) or something else? Do you have any hints on what should be changed or modified? I sent an email to Digium support and got only a reply like this: Although the card is being shown as an 'Unknown Device', it should still work properly. To be honest, I am not happy with that answer. FYI, I have installed Asterisk (CVS HEAD - 27 Sep 2005) on IBM xSeries 330 (8654-51Y) running Fedora Core 4 (kernel 2.6.12-1). Thanks in advance for youranswers. Kind regards, Anto ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users