Re: [asterisk-users] GXP1400

2012-04-21 Thread Doug Crompton
Just a note to say that updating the phone to the latest beta code -
1.0.3.30 - mostly solved the problems I was having. It now gives ring back
tones when making a local call however the early dial feature still does
not work as it should and did in earlier (GXP280) phones. When making a
call and hitting the digits the invite to Asterisk should be sent at the
release of the key. In the GXP1400 it is sent about 100ms after the key is
hit. Thus when you select a key you hear a short 100ms or so of the tone
and the invite is sent to Asterisk even though you have not released the
key. It does not sound natural and is not the way humans are use to
interacting with a phone. I am hoping that Grandstream corrects this on a
future firmware release.


On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Doug Crompton wrote:

 Some more input on this. I tried adding an explicit 'r' option to the dial
 command with no change. I also tried the 'progressinband=yes' setting in
 the section for this phone in sip.conf.  No difference. No call tones and
 no or little blip DTMF tones in the handset when making a call. Offsite
 calls return call ring tone.

 Doug


 On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Doug Crompton wrote:

  It is Asterisk 1.2 - yes I know old but it works for my application.  The
  problem would not be gain, I have plenty of handset gain. It is the fact
  that the ring confirmation tones on local calls, which would be generated
  by asterisk are not there. They work fine on my two other older
  Grandstream phones. Also when I enter digits I do not hear the DTMF tones
  or only a very short blip. It completes calls fine.
 
  I have tried with and without 'early call' and bot 'in band' and 'RFC2833'
  DTMF. No change with either.
 
  Any ideas?
 
  Doug
 
 
 
  On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Danny Nicholas wrote:
 
   You don't state which version of Asterisk you have this hooked up to, but
   dependent on that you might have rxgain and txgain available to you.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
   [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Doug 
   Crompton
   Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:36 PM
   To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
   Subject: [asterisk-users] GXP1400
  
   Just installed a Grandstream GXP1400 - I have several other older
   Grandstream phones installed. This one for some reason is operating
   differently. It works but I get no audible ring confirmation in the 
   headset
   when I make a local call and I also only hear a blip of the DTMF ddigits 
   or
   nothing at all in the headset as I key them in. Everything works OK, calls
   etc. just the audible feedback. Using an old Asterisk but all the other
   phones have worked fine. Is there some setting in Asterisk or the
   Grandstream I should be looking at to correct this?
  
   Doug
  
  
   --
   _
   -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New 
   to
   Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  
   --
   _
   -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
   New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
 
 
  Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people,
  it is true that most stupid people are conservative
 
  
  *  Doug Crompton   *
  *  Richboro, PA 18954  *
  *  215-355-5307*
  *  *
  * d...@crompton.com*
  * http://www.crompton.com  *
  
 
 
 
  --
  _
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
  New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
 http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



 Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people,
 it is true that most stupid people are conservative

 
 *  Doug Crompton *
 *  Richboro, PA 18954*
 *  215-355-5307  *
 **
 * d...@crompton.com*
 * http://www.crompton.com  *
 



 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New

[asterisk-users] GXP1400

2012-04-12 Thread Doug Crompton
Just installed a Grandstream GXP1400 - I have several other older
Grandstream phones installed. This one for some reason is operating
differently. It works but I get no audible ring confirmation in the
headset when I make a local call and I also only hear a blip of the DTMF
ddigits or nothing at all in the headset as I key them in. Everything
works OK, calls etc. just the audible feedback. Using an old Asterisk but
all the other phones have worked fine. Is there some setting in Asterisk
or the Grandstream I should be looking at to correct this?

Doug


--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] GXP1400

2012-04-12 Thread Doug Crompton
It is Asterisk 1.2 - yes I know old but it works for my application.  The
problem would not be gain, I have plenty of handset gain. It is the fact
that the ring confirmation tones on local calls, which would be generated
by asterisk are not there. They work fine on my two other older
Grandstream phones. Also when I enter digits I do not hear the DTMF tones
or only a very short blip. It completes calls fine.

I have tried with and without 'early call' and bot 'in band' and 'RFC2833'
DTMF. No change with either.

Any ideas?

Doug



On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Danny Nicholas wrote:

 You don't state which version of Asterisk you have this hooked up to, but
 dependent on that you might have rxgain and txgain available to you.

 -Original Message-
 From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
 [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Doug Crompton
 Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:36 PM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: [asterisk-users] GXP1400

 Just installed a Grandstream GXP1400 - I have several other older
 Grandstream phones installed. This one for some reason is operating
 differently. It works but I get no audible ring confirmation in the headset
 when I make a local call and I also only hear a blip of the DTMF ddigits or
 nothing at all in the headset as I key them in. Everything works OK, calls
 etc. just the audible feedback. Using an old Asterisk but all the other
 phones have worked fine. Is there some setting in Asterisk or the
 Grandstream I should be looking at to correct this?

 Doug


 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to
 Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people,
it is true that most stupid people are conservative


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-355-5307*
*  *
* d...@crompton.com*
* http://www.crompton.com  *




--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] GXP1400

2012-04-12 Thread Doug Crompton
Some more input on this. I tried adding an explicit 'r' option to the dial
command with no change. I also tried the 'progressinband=yes' setting in
the section for this phone in sip.conf.  No difference. No call tones and
no or little blip DTMF tones in the handset when making a call. Offsite
calls return call ring tone.

Doug


On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Doug Crompton wrote:

 It is Asterisk 1.2 - yes I know old but it works for my application.  The
 problem would not be gain, I have plenty of handset gain. It is the fact
 that the ring confirmation tones on local calls, which would be generated
 by asterisk are not there. They work fine on my two other older
 Grandstream phones. Also when I enter digits I do not hear the DTMF tones
 or only a very short blip. It completes calls fine.

 I have tried with and without 'early call' and bot 'in band' and 'RFC2833'
 DTMF. No change with either.

 Any ideas?

 Doug



 On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, Danny Nicholas wrote:

  You don't state which version of Asterisk you have this hooked up to, but
  dependent on that you might have rxgain and txgain available to you.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
  [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Doug Crompton
  Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 3:36 PM
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  Subject: [asterisk-users] GXP1400
 
  Just installed a Grandstream GXP1400 - I have several other older
  Grandstream phones installed. This one for some reason is operating
  differently. It works but I get no audible ring confirmation in the headset
  when I make a local call and I also only hear a blip of the DTMF ddigits or
  nothing at all in the headset as I key them in. Everything works OK, calls
  etc. just the audible feedback. Using an old Asterisk but all the other
  phones have worked fine. Is there some setting in Asterisk or the
  Grandstream I should be looking at to correct this?
 
  Doug
 
 
  --
  _
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to
  Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
 http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
  --
  _
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
  New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
 http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



 Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people,
 it is true that most stupid people are conservative

 
 *  Doug Crompton *
 *  Richboro, PA 18954*
 *  215-355-5307  *
 **
 * d...@crompton.com*
 * http://www.crompton.com  *
 



 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people,
it is true that most stupid people are conservative


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-355-5307*
*  *
* d...@crompton.com*
* http://www.crompton.com  *




--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Featuremap help

2009-12-02 Thread Doug Crompton
Using version 1.2.35 built by root @ slate on a i686 running Linux on
2009-09-15 00:24:10 UTC

Problem - I cannot get featuremap right.

Have added a feature that I want to direct to an extension in
extension.conf

Extension is 521

In features.conf -

[applicationmap]
dumpcaller = #9,callee,goto(521|1)

show features -

Dynamic Feature   Default Current
---   --- ---
dumpcallerno def  #9

Result

 --  Feature Found: dumpcaller exten: dumpcaller
Dec  1 20:08:02 WARNING[18659]: res_features.c:958 feature_exec_app: Could
not find application (goto(521|1))


I have tried many variations per docs.  It shows goto(521|1)   also tried
(521,1) and  dial(local/521/n) and many others.  Always get could not find
application.

Any ideas?

Doug



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Featuremap help

2009-12-01 Thread Doug Crompton

Using version 1.2.35 built by root @ slate on a i686 running Linux on
2009-09-15 00:24:10 UTC

Problem - I cannot get featuremap right.

Have added a feature that I want to direct to an extension in
extension.conf

Extension is 521

In features.conf -

[applicationmap]
dumpcaller = #9,callee,goto(521|1)

show features -

Dynamic Feature   Default Current
---   --- ---
dumpcallerno def  #9

Result

 --  Feature Found: dumpcaller exten: dumpcaller
Dec  1 20:08:02 WARNING[18659]: res_features.c:958 feature_exec_app: Could
not find application (goto(521|1))


I have tried many variations per docs.  It shows goto(521|1)   also tried
(521,1) and  dial(local/521/n) ad many others.  Always get could not find
application.

Any ideas?

Doug


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Choppy audio

2008-07-02 Thread Doug Crompton
OK in my research here is what I found.

I seem to get the idea from what I read that ztdummy is not needed for 1.2
(and above) versions for anything but meetme. I never used ztdummy in my
old system and it worked just fine. I really see no difference here with
it running or not. Please confirm - is this timing required for just
simple wav/gsm playback - like voicmail, etc. ?

I played around with kernel options

echo 0  /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
echo performance  /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor

Which essentially makes it a 1 CPU system at max performance.

NO CHANGE.

Then put it back...

echo ondemand  /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo 1  /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online

Tried this

echo 1  /sys/module/processor/parameters/max_cstate

Default was 8.

NO CHANGE.

Let me reconfirm what I am hearing. The audio choppiness is subtle but
definitely there. It seems to happen at the exact SAME place everytime I
play it, which is suspicious! Could this be sometihng completely different
then what we are suspecting? It seems to get out of sync. sometimes it
seems it is playing future audio on top of current by only Ms's or maybe
it is putting a hole there. Hard to tell.

OH I also tried compiling with the O2 optimization rather then the O8 in
the default Asterisk Makefile. Again NO CHANGE.

Any more ideas would be helpful.

Doug

On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Benjamin Jacob wrote:


  modprobe zaptel; modprobe ztdummy
 That will start zaptel and ztdummy after the 'zaptel stop'. Then restart 
 asterisk.




 --- On Wed, 7/2/08, Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  From: Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Choppy audio
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
  asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
  Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 1:58 AM
  OK just to be clear on what you recommend...
 
  Stop everything, unload zaptel and zrdummy modules... then
  just
  restart asterisk? Does it start zaptel?
 
  This is NOT a slow box. P6 dual core 4 gig cache, 3800
  bogomips.
 
  Doug
 
  On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, bkruse wrote:
 
   I would recommend stopping asterisk
  (/etc/init.d/asterisk stop)
   /etc/init.d/zaptel stop (unload all modules)
   modprobe zaptel; modprobe ztdummy (in the case that
  you don't have
   another card for a timing device)
   /etc/init.d/asterisk start
  
  
 





 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Choppy audio

2008-07-02 Thread Doug Crompton
Tzafrir,

 I have neither of those commands available here. Did a search to see if
they were somewhere else but nothing. Using SUSE 10.2. In /proc I only
have apci directory.

Doug

On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:

 On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 02:47:34PM -0500, spectro wrote:
  On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Using  1.2.29 on Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3 (SUSE 10.2) Intel 686 dual
   core.
   I am getting choppy audio in voicemail and general message playback.
  
 
  see if disabling APM in your kernel solves the issue, add apm=off to
  kernel boot options.

 Anything still uses APM (as oposed to ACPI) noawadays?

 $ /sbin/acpi_available  echo yes
 yes
 $ /sbin/apm_available  echo yes
 (nothing)

 --
Tzafrir Cohen
 icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 +972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Choppy audio

2008-07-02 Thread Doug Crompton
I am not sure who all see's this list but I do have a few questions that
probably only the developers or somone really in the know of Asterisk
could answer.

- What is the requirement for timing vs. audio playback in Asterisk.
Specifically voicemail and IVR's (Not meetme)

- Has this requirment changed in newer versions?

This obviously is when using Asterisk with no internal cards. I used
Asterisk for several years with a P3 Linux system, NO timing, and it
worked flawlessly. Now with this new Pentium Dual core system I do not
have the perfect audio I experienced with the less powerful system.

I fully know there are MANY variable here. It could be a combination of
many things, including the OS (Linux Kernel) etc. BUT I offer this input,
Music on Hold works fine. This uses mpg123. So why can this palyback fine
and the other wav/gsm audio be choppy?

I would gladly switch to a newer Asterisk (using 1.2.29) if someone said
this was solved in that version.

My system can obviously play (mpg123 - background) audio fine. Why then
does Asterisk internal audio not also play well?

Doug


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Choppy audio

2008-07-01 Thread Doug Crompton
Using  1.2.29 on Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3 (SUSE 10.2) Intel 686 dual
core.

I just switched over to this system from an older SUSE 2.4.10 kernel
system.

I am getting choppy audio in voicemail and general message playback.

I installed Zaptel and ztdummy module and the following is zaptel status:

slate:/etc/init.d # cat /proc/zaptel/1
Span 1: ZTDUMMY/1 ZTDUMMY/1 (source: RTC) 1

Is this indicating proper installation? Is there anything else I should
try/do??

The choppyness is not extreme, just not perfect. I had no problem in my
old system with 2.4. I had not even installed zaptel or ztdummy there.

Doug


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *





___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Choppy audio

2008-07-01 Thread Doug Crompton
As an addendum to my original message...

In my research it appears this often happens when using more than one
processor. I am using a dual core Pentium.

I guess my dilema here is which way to go. Clearly the audio is not
working the way I would like it to and the way I came to expect from my
old system. When playing messages it seems to get out of sync. Sometimes
skipping ms's of audio. This seems to happen at about a 2-4 second rate.

I believe that I have things setup to use the RTC as a timing device (see
below) but that did not seem to change the problem. It may have made it
better but not much.

What are my choices? HW card?, Upgrade Asterisk?, 

Doug

On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Doug Crompton wrote:

 Using  1.2.29 on Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3 (SUSE 10.2) Intel 686 dual
 core.

 I just switched over to this system from an older SUSE 2.4.10 kernel
 system.

 I am getting choppy audio in voicemail and general message playback.

 I installed Zaptel and ztdummy module and the following is zaptel status:

 slate:/etc/init.d # cat /proc/zaptel/1
 Span 1: ZTDUMMY/1 ZTDUMMY/1 (source: RTC) 1

 Is this indicating proper installation? Is there anything else I should
 try/do??

 The choppyness is not extreme, just not perfect. I had no problem in my
 old system with 2.4. I had not even installed zaptel or ztdummy there.

 Doug

 
 *  Doug Crompton *
 *  Richboro, PA 18954*
 *  215-431-6307  *
 **
 * [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
 * http://www.crompton.com  *
 




 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Choppy audio

2008-07-01 Thread Doug Crompton
I saw that bug. Most of my files are WAV though. Would it apply to them
also?

Doug

On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Noah Miller wrote:

 Hi Doug -

  In my research it appears this often happens when using more than one
  processor. I am using a dual core Pentium.
 
  I guess my dilema here is which way to go. Clearly the audio is not
  working the way I would like it to and the way I came to expect from my
  old system. When playing messages it seems to get out of sync. Sometimes
  skipping ms's of audio. This seems to happen at about a 2-4 second rate.
 
  I believe that I have things setup to use the RTC as a timing device (see
  below) but that did not seem to change the problem. It may have made it
  better but not much.
 
  What are my choices? HW card?, Upgrade Asterisk?, 

 The symptoms don't sound exactly the same, but is it possible that
 this is the GSM/GCC playback bug?

 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11243


 - Noah

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Choppy audio

2008-07-01 Thread Doug Crompton
OK just to be clear on what you recommend...

Stop everything, unload zaptel and zrdummy modules... then just
restart asterisk? Does it start zaptel?

This is NOT a slow box. P6 dual core 4 gig cache, 3800 bogomips.

Doug

On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, bkruse wrote:

 I would recommend stopping asterisk (/etc/init.d/asterisk stop)
 /etc/init.d/zaptel stop (unload all modules)
 modprobe zaptel; modprobe ztdummy (in the case that you don't have
 another card for a timing device)
 /etc/init.d/asterisk start


 If it is a relatively slow box, try getting the exact sound files you will
 be playing back, if you have the space (make menuselect).

 -bk

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] CallWithUs Service?

2007-09-13 Thread Doug Crompton
John,

 I have used callwithus for almost 9 months. I left Gizmo when they had a
doubling of their rates. I probably would have put up with the doubling
but the fact that you can set your callerid at callwithus (and not Gizmo)
was a big selling point. I have kept a minimum Verizon analog line for
local and 911 dialing and I wanted my announced callerid to be my verizon
number. With callwithus this is easy. I created a perl script to route the
calls wither local to verizon or all else to callwithus.

I also opted for the higher quality option. This is something like 1.5
rather than 1 cent/minute. This is not advertised but if you email them
they will bump it up for you. I was not happy, at times, with the call
quality at the 1 cent rate, although this may differ for you.

I connect via iax, but you can also use sip.

As far as I am concerned this is a no frills service that has worked for
me.

Doug

On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, John Meksavan wrote:

 Asterisk Users,

   I am thinking about selecting CALLWITHUS as my sip provider.  Has anybody
 ever used them?  How was the call quality?  DTMF Tones issues?

   Thanks in advance.


 -John

 _
 Gear up for Halo? 3 with free downloads and an exclusive offer.
 http://gethalo3gear.com?ocid=SeptemberWLHalo3_MSNHMTxt_1





Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *




___

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] OT - robo dialer

2007-05-03 Thread Doug Crompton
Can anyone suggest a source for a free robot dialer or examples? I need to
do some non-commercial auto dialing using Asterisk. Simple phone numbers
in a file, line by line format.

I found one called AstAutoDiaker but I was not able to get it to work and
it appears to not be supported - no email response from author.


Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] OT - robo dialer

2007-05-03 Thread Doug Crompton
Thanks Chris,

 Looks like a lot of capability. I can deal with Perl but I still was
hoping for something a little more turnkey.

Doug

On Fri, 4 May 2007, Chris Bennett wrote:

 Hi Doug,

  Can anyone suggest a source for a free robot dialer or examples? I need to
  do some non-commercial auto dialing using Asterisk. Simple phone numbers
  in a file, line by line format.
 
  I found one called AstAutoDiaker but I was not able to get it to work and
  it appears to not be supported - no email response from author.

 If you are comfortable with Perl (programming language), or have
 access to somebody who is, you could get something working with the
 CPAN module Net::SIP ..
   http://search.cpan.org/~sullr/Net-SIP-0.26/

 Amongst other things, it can be a 'phone' with the module
 Net::SIP::Endpoint.
   http://search.cpan.org/~sullr/Net-SIP-0.26/lib/Net/SIP/Endpoint.pod

 I havn't used it myself as yet but intend to in the next few months.
 If your requirements are for unattended dialling then you might find
 this option more flexible since you can make it do exactly what you
 want.

 Good luck with it anyhow! :)

 Regards,

 Chris Bennett
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Using Asterisk/callerid with pay as you go

2007-02-13 Thread Doug Crompton
Yes, thank you. I found one, callwithus which has excellant Asterisk
support, IAX/SIP and the support actually answered in minutes! So far good
connects (usig IAX) and good prices. Lets hope it stays that way.

I wonder why more companies can't be like that. This callerID thing is
stupid. If you can go to many companies and can set it then why don't all
companies offer that feature? It certainly would be a customer draw.

Doug

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Dovid B wrote:

 If you asked this question on the biz list you would get a lot of people
 that will tell you that they offer services where you can set the caller ID
 to what ever you want. To name a few::
 Nufone
 Teliax
 Voipjet

 - Original Message -
 From: Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:33 PM
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Using Asterisk/callerid with pay as you go
 VOIPproviders


 I am curious how others handle call out VOIP and callerid. I have found
  numerous providers that are cheap and seem to have good voice quality but
  offer no provisions for callerid.  I find it almost useless to use call
  out when the receiving party gets some bogus callerid number that has no
  relation to my call.
 
  I understand the big thing is spoofing callerid but are there any
  companies that offer a means of qualifying callerid so it works right?
 
  Like it or not callerid is used heavily and without a proper return ID
  many callee's don't answer and if they tried to return the call they get
  no where. Seems like a big problem to me.
 
  Very aggrevating.
 
  Doug
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Using Asterisk/callerid with pay as you go VOIP providers

2007-02-12 Thread Doug Crompton
I am curious how others handle call out VOIP and callerid. I have found
numerous providers that are cheap and seem to have good voice quality but
offer no provisions for callerid.  I find it almost useless to use call
out when the receiving party gets some bogus callerid number that has no
relation to my call.

I understand the big thing is spoofing callerid but are there any
companies that offer a means of qualifying callerid so it works right?

Like it or not callerid is used heavily and without a proper return ID
many callee's don't answer and if they tried to return the call they get
no where. Seems like a big problem to me.

Very aggrevating.

Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SPA3K to SPA3K DTMF issue

2007-01-25 Thread Doug Crompton
As per my (numerous) prior statements on this subject Asterisk WILL
NOT properly work with the spa-3000 DTMF in rfc2833. Use INBAND when
dealing with Asterisk on both the FXO/FXS ports of the spa3k if you are
dealing with Asterisk. This is a setting in BOTH sip.conf and spa3k pstn
and line 1 tabs.

Symptoms are no DTMF after call completion (voicemail
from outside to fxo) and IVR attempts from FXS attached analog phones.

Using INFO negates use of dtmf control functions on your fxs/fxo ports -
transfer etc. - Take your pick of what is more important to you.

There should really be a wiki on this! It gets asked often.

I might qualify that this is an issue with 1.2.x (and probably earlier) -
not sure if any fixes make this work or work better in 1.4. Fault
(apparently) lies with both sipura(linksys) and digium.

Since in this case you are connecting the spa3k's thru Asterisk this would
apply. I have not tried connecting two spa3k's directly together via
network to see if they play together in this regard.

Doug


On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Mark Coccimiglio wrote:

 My experience has been to be consistant.  The only time I have had
 problems with DTMF is when I am not using the same DTMF encoding
 technique on all hardware.  Your choices are: INFO, RFC2833 or
 INBAND.  Some equipment also has an AUTO option but I would not
 recomend it.  Stick with INFO or rfc2833 and be consistant across the
 enterprise.

 Mark C
 IS Manager
 http://www.psh-inc.com

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi all,
 
  Has anyone faced an issue when sending DTMF from FXS of one SPA3K to
  FXO of another SPA3K through asterisk?
 
  Im not able to send it properly. Wanna be sure if its an issue faced
  by all..
 
  If you have a fix for it, pls guide me.
 
  Thanks
 
  Dan
 
 
 
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Dtmf tones and SIP

2007-01-17 Thread Doug Crompton
I aaume you are calling in on a PSTN line? If so what fxo are you using
with Asterisk.

Doug

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Giuffredi wrote:

 Hi list,



 I tried to use DISA in order to get the line when I call with my mobile
 phone but the system doesn't recognise my DTMF tones when I call to a SIP
 trunk.

 Everything is working Ok if I use a ZAP Trunks.





 I tried to google to find a solution but I wasn't able to find any.





 Any idea?



 I'm using trixbox 2 with 4 SIP trunks and a Zaptel TDM 400 card.





 Bye




Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SPA 3000 won't relay DTMF to doorphone

2007-01-15 Thread Doug Crompton
I use default values for both of those. The big thing is to call youself.
Use a cell, call a phone on the FXS. Hit a key on the cell and listen
on FXS for DTMF. Make changes, reboot, and repeat. Hearing is believing.
It is so much easier! I think you will find the inband will work.

Doug

On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 02:33:54PM -0500, Doug Crompton wrote:
  I am using spa3000 hardware - 2.0.1(5673) firmware - 3.1.3(GWa)
  I have used newer firmwares but find that 3.1.3 had less echo problems.

 Thanks again Doug for that detailed explanation.

 As for the DTMF playback level and DTMF playback length settings,
 what do you use?
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SPA 3000 won't relay DTMF to doorphone

2007-01-15 Thread Doug Crompton
I am not sure what you are asking? The problem is that rfc2833 does not
play well with the spa-3000 and Asterisk. I am not sure if it is limited
to just the spa3k. There is a bug causing this that has been documented.
Google spa3000 dtmf bug asterisk for more info. The bottom line is that
you need to use sip info (inband dtmf) if you desire dtmf transfer to the
other party after the call has completed. Such as you call a bank, or you
call your Asterisk voicemail, or your door lock which is actuated by dtmf.
If none of these are of interest and you would rather have the dtmf
features of Asterisk, then use rfc2833. you can't have both!

Doug

On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Julio Arruda wrote:

 Doug,
 You are saying that RFC2833 somehow doesn't work if you have the
 Asterisk AND at a distinct time (still within the same call), the callee
 to see the DTMF, correct ? Would this be in any case ? (meaning, if the
 voice path is going via the Asterisk or UA to UA directly ?)

 I've my spa3k right now somewhat far :-), and I can't test it, but you
 know by any chance if SIP INFO would suffer from the same curse :-) ?
  From my limited understand, a big difference in this case is that
 RFC2833 really is in the RTP stream, but is not voice payload, while
 with SIP INFO, is done 100% out-of-band.



 Doug Crompton wrote:
  I am using spa3000 hardware - 2.0.1(5673) firmware - 3.1.3(GWa)
  I have used newer firmwares but find that 3.1.3 had less echo problems.
 
  Connect a real analog phone to spa3000 fxs.  Call it from another source,
  when connected send DTMF tones from that source. You should hear at least
  100ms or more of the tone. inband should work. I suspect you are using
  alaw or ulaw codecs. There is really no reason to use anything else. When
  it does not work you will hear nothing more then a click or an ocassional
  to short tone.
 
  Another thing to check is that you should not be using any transfer
  options in your dial statement (t or T or other special features.
 
  You really have to listen to this to check it and make changes. Be sure to
  restart both spa3000 and asterisk when you make changes. Otherwise you can
  get fooled.
 
  If you are making the call from the spa3000 fxo to fxs, you need to have
  inband in BOTH.
 
  This is a known bug in Asteriskspa3000 for dtmf. I think the problem is
  somewhat shared but improvements in 1.4 may gelp or fic the problem. I am
  using 1.2 so I cannot answer that.
 
  Basically when using the spa3000 you have to make the choice of wether you
  want to be able to use dtmf features (transfer etc.)OR have the capability
  to send DTMF to or from the caller or callee. you really can't have both.
  Thus inband vs. rfc2833. I chose inband so I can interact with called
  ivr's and call in from pstn and access my VM.
 
  Doug
 
 
  On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
 
  On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:58:16AM -0500, Doug Crompton wrote:
  The spa3000 does not play well with Asterisk with dtmf rfc2833 signaling.
  Set BOTH the sip.conf AND the spa3000 to inband for DTMF. That would be
  the line1 tab on spa3000. This applies to the fxo (pstn) also if you are
  using it for such things as ivr's.
  Thanks for your suggestion. We tried that without success (using firmware
  3.1.7(GWc))
 
  Do you think an upgrade to 3.1.10 might be warranted?
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SPA 3000 won't relay DTMF to doorphone

2007-01-15 Thread Doug Crompton
OK... I understand. As I remember I did try other methods like INFO. It
has been awhile. I think INBAND is the only one that worked for me.

Doug

On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Julio Arruda wrote:

 Doug Crompton wrote:
  I am not sure what you are asking? The problem is that rfc2833 does not
  play well with the spa-3000 and Asterisk. I am not sure if it is limited
  to just the spa3k. There is a bug causing this that has been documented.
  Google spa3000 dtmf bug asterisk for more info. The bottom line is that
  you need to use sip info (inband dtmf) if you desire dtmf transfer to the
  other party after the call has completed. Such as you call a bank, or you
  call your Asterisk voicemail, or your door lock which is actuated by dtmf.
  If none of these are of interest and you would rather have the dtmf
  features of Asterisk, then use rfc2833. you can't have both!


 SIP INFO is not the same as Inband DTMF, that is why I'm asking.
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SPA 3000 won't relay DTMF to doorphone

2007-01-12 Thread Doug Crompton
The spa3000 does not play well with Asterisk with dtmf rfc2833 signaling.
Set BOTH the sip.conf AND the spa3000 to inband for DTMF. That would be
the line1 tab on spa3000. This applies to the fxo (pstn) also if you are
using it for such things as ivr's.

Doug

On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:

 Hello,

 Before throwing in the towel with my Sipura 3000 has anyone had much
 success with that adapter connected to a door phone?

 In our setup a doorphone is connected to the SPA's fxs port. When a
 visitor rings, asterisk calls a group of Polycoms and the person who
 answers has to enter *1 to trigger the door opening.

 However it seems the SPA doesn't relay the DTMF's to the doorbell.

 Any suggestions more than welcome, thanks,
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SPA 3000 won't relay DTMF to doorphone

2007-01-12 Thread Doug Crompton
I am using spa3000 hardware - 2.0.1(5673) firmware - 3.1.3(GWa)
I have used newer firmwares but find that 3.1.3 had less echo problems.

Connect a real analog phone to spa3000 fxs.  Call it from another source,
when connected send DTMF tones from that source. You should hear at least
100ms or more of the tone. inband should work. I suspect you are using
alaw or ulaw codecs. There is really no reason to use anything else. When
it does not work you will hear nothing more then a click or an ocassional
to short tone.

Another thing to check is that you should not be using any transfer
options in your dial statement (t or T or other special features.

You really have to listen to this to check it and make changes. Be sure to
restart both spa3000 and asterisk when you make changes. Otherwise you can
get fooled.

If you are making the call from the spa3000 fxo to fxs, you need to have
inband in BOTH.

This is a known bug in Asteriskspa3000 for dtmf. I think the problem is
somewhat shared but improvements in 1.4 may gelp or fic the problem. I am
using 1.2 so I cannot answer that.

Basically when using the spa3000 you have to make the choice of wether you
want to be able to use dtmf features (transfer etc.)OR have the capability
to send DTMF to or from the caller or callee. you really can't have both.
Thus inband vs. rfc2833. I chose inband so I can interact with called
ivr's and call in from pstn and access my VM.

Doug


On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:58:16AM -0500, Doug Crompton wrote:
  The spa3000 does not play well with Asterisk with dtmf rfc2833 signaling.
  Set BOTH the sip.conf AND the spa3000 to inband for DTMF. That would be
  the line1 tab on spa3000. This applies to the fxo (pstn) also if you are
  using it for such things as ivr's.

 Thanks for your suggestion. We tried that without success (using firmware
 3.1.7(GWc))

 Do you think an upgrade to 3.1.10 might be warranted?
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Get dialed numbers in AGI

2007-01-11 Thread Doug Crompton
I am not sure if this is what you meant in your query. Here is a Perl
script that checks a dialed numbers areacode/exchange and determines if it
is a local or long distance call. I then send it out either PSTN or SIP.
The dialed number is sent to the script which returns true or false.

There might be a better way to check the return code but I was never able
to get a straight answer on that and this works.

This would work similarly in a PHP script with appropriate changes.

#!/usr/bin/perl
#
# Perl Script to determine if a call is in the local calling area
# Doug Crompton - 12/2006
#
# agi-local.agi
#
#  Example in extensions.conf  -
#
#   exten = _215NXX,1,AGI(agi-local.agi)
#   exten = _215NXX,n,Gotoif($[ ${localcall} = 1 ]? 10:20)
#   exten = _215NXX,10,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],60,T)   
Local Call
#   exten = _215NXX,11,Macro(failann,${DIALSTATUS})
#   exten = _215NXX,20,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],120,T)  
Non Local Call
#   exten = _215NXX,21,Macro(failann,${DIALSTATUS})
#

use Asterisk::AGI;

$AGI = new Asterisk::AGI;

my %input = $AGI-ReadParse();
$|=1;
my $lc = 0;
my $ret = 0;

if (my $exten = $input{'extension'}) {
my $area_code = substr($exten,0,3);
if ($area_code =~ /215|267|445/ ) {
$AGI-say_digits($area_code);
my $a215 = ($area_code =~ /215/);
my $a267 = ($area_code =~ /267/);
my $a445 = ($area_code =~ /445/);
my $exchange = substr($exten,3,3);

# Philadelphia Zone 4
# 215
$lc = $lc || ($a215  ($exchange =~
/214|268|270|281|288|289|305|330|331|332|333|335|338|342|4
#267
$lc = $lc || ($a267  ($exchange =~
/340|341|343|344|345|348|350|351|407|579|672|731/));
#
# Bensalem - Eddington - Cornwell Heights
# 215
$lc = $lc || ($a215  ($exchange =~
/202|244|245|352|447|604|633|638|639|642|645|650|688|929/)
# 267
$lc = $lc || ($a267  ($exchange =~
/223|332|520|522|523|525|526|527|529|681|704|771/));
#
# Bethayres - Huntingdon Valley
# 215
$lc = $lc || ($a215  ($exchange =~
/344|544|914|938|947|974|975/));
# 267
$lc = $lc || ($a267  ($exchange =~
/277|502|571|706|722|723|725|727|728|729/));
#
# Churchville - Feasterville
# 215
$lc = ($a215  ($exchange =~
/322|354|355|357|364|396|436|485|494|526|791|876|942|953/));
# 267
$lc = $lc || ($a267  ($exchange =~
/288|442|574|632|684|699|762|912|982|983|984|986|988|989|9
#
# Hatboro
# 215
$lc = $lc || ($a215  ($exchange =~
/259|293|315|323|325|328|347|385|394|420|441|442|443|444|6
# 267
$lc = $lc || ($a267  ($exchange =~
/220|280|282|317|387|532|537|615|732|803|960|961|963|965|9
#
# Langhorne
# 215
$lc = $lc || ($a215  ($exchange =~
/359|375|478|539|702|710|741|750|752|757|809|891|970/));
# 267
$lc = $lc || ($a267  ($exchange =~
/212|276|560|563|564|565|567|568|569|572|689|802|819|852/)
#
# Warrington
# 215
$lc = $lc || ($a215  ($exchange =~
/318|343|488|491|792|798|918/));
# 267
$lc = $lc || ($a267  ($exchange =~
/480|482|483|485|486|487|488|489|561|855|915|927/));
#
# Willow Grove
# 215
$lc = $lc || ($a215  ($exchange =~
/346|366|392|395|449|657|658|659|706|784|830|882|902/));
# 267
$lc = $lc || ($a267  ($exchange =~
/495|518|607|715|781|851|913|942|943|944|947|948|949/));
#
# Newtown
# 215
$lc = $lc || ($a215  ($exchange =~
/434|497|504|550|579|860|867|944|968/));
# 267
$lc = $lc || ($a267  ($exchange =~
/291|352|364|685|750|751|753|755|756|757|759/));
#
# Wycombe
# 215
$lc = $lc || ($a215  ($exchange =~ /598/));
# 267
$lc = $lc || ($a267  ($exchange =~
/396|491|493|494|719/));
#
if ($lc) {
$ret = 1;
$AGI-say_digits($exchange);
}

}
}
$AGI-set_variable('localcall',$ret);
exit;



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Where is this hilarious Allison Smith file? (Also: Interview with Allison)

2007-01-11 Thread Doug Crompton
And the big question is are you going to use it in your home or a
business. No one is going to sue an individual for using it for
non-business even though it technically would be in violation. Same goes
for MOH content.

Doug

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Paul wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
 
 
 
 Jerry Glomph Black wrote:
 
 
 I cannot find this file anywhere, despite thorough searching.
 Certainly not in the two usual big sound tarfiles.   I have a great
 place for this file in my extensions.conf, no doubt.
 
 
 It has not been made available for distribution, sorry.
 
 
 
 Well, seeing its at the start of the interview, I think you'll find that
 it has been distributed ...
 
 
 Yes but 2 important questions arise:

 Was the interview was put under a license that allows redistribution?

 If so, does that license allow redistribution in part?

 If the answer to both is yes you can take your favorite sound editor to
 the file and create prompt files. I seriously doubt it was distributed
 under such terms.

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1

2007-01-10 Thread Doug Crompton
Formated your hardisk... wow that is nasty, but I also cannot understand
how that could ever happen. There must be some other HW problem going on
or you got a hold of some really bad code.

What code (source or binary) and what were you doing when that happenned?

Doug

On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote:

 Thanks for the help. I was concerned because I tried once before and it
 formatted my hard disk. I wanted to be sure that did not happen again.\
 Bob Rawlinson

 On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 11:04 -0500, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote:
  Has anyone heard of a build or instructions for installing Asterisk on a
  Suse 10.1 system?
  Bob Rawlinson
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

k

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1

2007-01-10 Thread Doug Crompton
With the RPM you get what you get. Why not get the latest source at digium
and compile it. It is not hard to do.

Doug

On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote:

 Yes you are correct. I do NOT plan to use it again. I have downloaded
 the latest version and plan to do an install. I was hoping there might
 be an rpm for it but does not seem to be. Thanks all.
 Bob Rawlinson

 On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 18:25 +0100, Anton Frolov wrote:
  he is probably tried to install one of these All in one Asterisk CDs, that
  effectively formats the hard drive and installs everything from scratch,
  including the OS ;)
 
  And, yes, it will happen again, if he re-runs this CD...
 
  AF.
 
 
  Doug Crompton wrote:
   Formated your hardisk... wow that is nasty, but I also cannot understand
   how that could ever happen. There must be some other HW problem going on
   or you got a hold of some really bad code.
  
   What code (source or binary) and what were you doing when that happenned?
  
   Doug
  
   On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote:
  
   Thanks for the help. I was concerned because I tried once before and it
   formatted my hard disk. I wanted to be sure that did not happen again.\
   Bob Rawlinson
  
   On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 11:04 -0500, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote:
   Has anyone heard of a build or instructions for installing Asterisk on a
   Suse 10.1 system?
   Bob Rawlinson
  
  
   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
   k
  
   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk build for Suse 10.1

2007-01-09 Thread Doug Crompton
When you say build do you mean a plug and play binary? I use SUSE 7.3
here and it is easy to get the source files and compile it. It should
just work. The instructions would be in the README or INSTALL file in the
source.

1. Get the source at digium (the 1.2.x version might be better to start
with.

2. tar -xvzf version_name

3. cd to the directory tree made by step 2

4. Read the README and/or INSTALL text files for info on how to proceed

5. make

6. make install

These steps would vary depending on wether you need zap or other drivers
which would be compiled first. you would also want to download and install
the sound files.

There might be an easier install for a specific O/S version but I prefer
to do things manually here. Of course I still do most everything at the
command prompt also. I do not use a windowed system for my server.

I don't see any reason why 10.1 would be any different then my 7.3 in the
installation procedure.

Doug

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Robert A. Rawlinson wrote:

 Has anyone heard of a build or instructions for installing Asterisk on a
 Suse 10.1 system?
 Bob Rawlinson


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.2.11 - ResponseTimeout being ignored

2007-01-09 Thread Doug Crompton
You need a 'waitexten()' after the background command.

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Erik Anderson wrote:

 All - this is probably a simple problem, but I've been pulling my hair
 out trying to figure out what I'm doing wrong.  I'm building a
 *simple* IVR menu.  Here it is:

 [main-menu]
 exten = s,1,Answer
 exten = s,2,SetMusicOnHold(default)
 exten = s,3,DigitTimeout(5)
 exten = s,4,ResponseTimeout(30)
 exten = s,5,Background(logic-main)
 exten = _4XX,1,Macro(stdexten,SIP/${EXTEN})
 exten = 0,1,VoiceMail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 exten = 2,1,Directory(default|logic-boston]
 exten = 2,2,Goto(main-menu,s,5)
 exten = 3,1,Playback(logic-directions)
 exten = 3,2,Goto(main-menu,s,5)
 exten = t,1,GoTo(main-menu,s,5)

 Everything is working fine except the ResponseTimeout().  My
 understanding is that, as configured above, asterisk will wait for 30
 seconds...if, after that amount of time, it hasn't received valid
 digits, it'll jump to the t extension.  That's not happening.
 Immediately after the Background() sound file completes, I get this:

 -- Playing 'logic-main' (language 'en')
 == Auto fallthrough, channel 'SIP/445-0815e1d0' status is 'UNKNOWN'

 Any ideas?  This seemed like it should be simple, but it's getting the
 best of me.

 Thanks-
 Erik

 --
 Erik Anderson
 http://andersonfam.org
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] how to transfer calls when analog phone hasnotransfer button

2007-01-05 Thread Doug Crompton
Well it would be interesting to know what FXS device you are using to
connect the analog phones. I use an SPA-3000 fxo/fxs and with it you could
bypass Asterisk and connect the FXO to FXS or dial directly if it were so
configured, so reinvite would work but wwould probably not be desired but
that is not the question...

I am using the SPA-3000 as both an FXO (connection to telco) and FXS
(connection to my house analog phones) with Asterisk in between. I have
said this before on here but I will say it again. With the SPA-3000 you
cannot have analog phone feature keys, transfer etc. AND still be able to
use DTMF for control outside of the dialplan.

If you want feature key control then you would use rfc2833 DTMF, if you
want to be able to use DTMF incoming or outgoing for control then you must
use inband DTMF. It is either/or.

My choice was to use inband and not have features selected for the analog
phones. To often I would use these phines with banking or on incoming to
control voicemail functions so I wanted that capability.

In that case a hook flash works fine. If you have never done it just flash
the hook for a second (or use the flash key on the phone) and you will get
another dialtone. Then you can call another party, tell them you have a
call to transfer and hangup or click again and bring them in as a
conference.

Doug


On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Don Pobanz wrote:

  Erick Perez
 
  Don, I suppose that in order for this to work i need
  canreinvite=no, right?
 

 No! It doesn't matter what you have for 'canreinvite' since
 'canreinvite' is a SIP attribute, not an analog phone attribute.
 For analog phones, Asterisk will always be in the call path. :-)

 --
 Don Pobanz
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Voicemail to email

2007-01-03 Thread Doug Crompton
There should be an example in your voicemail.conf

Here is mine...

mail is tagged from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In voicemail.conf

mailcmd=/usr/sbin/sendmail -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You of course would use the mailer that your system uses. I have sendmail
on the same system as Asterisk.

There are many other things you can define for mail but all should be in
your example  voicemail.conf

Doug

On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Mark Greene wrote:

 Hey guys,

 I need to set up asterisk so that it sends the voicemail to the users email.
 I understand that I need to say attatch=yes, but what else needs to be
 done. I would think that somewhere I need to specify the server that it uses
 to send the email, etc.

 - Mark



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] connecting asterisk (trixbox) to traditional phone lines?

2007-01-02 Thread Doug Crompton
try

http://www.digitnetworks.com/X100P_FXO_PCI_Card_p/x100p.htm

On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:

 On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 10:25:45PM -0500, cb wrote:
  On Jan 2, 2007, at 10:15 PM, blackwater dev wrote:
 
  I have trixbox working how I want.  How do I now (cheaply as
  possibly) get a phone number so people can call it from any
  number?  I am just doing a prototype so just want it done cheaply
  so I can demo it to my supervisors.
 
  I just went thru this recently. I ended up buying a compatible modem
  on Ebay. You can find them easily if you search for FXO or X100 but
  then you may also end up paying a premium to get one that is
  specifically being sold to the Asterisk community. (keep in mind
  premium being around $30, so we still aren't talking about an
  outrageous price)

 Those 30$ cards are as good as the 10$ cards. Same low quality. They are
 nice for playing games. If you're lucky enough it may actually work for
 you. In the worst case you only lost 30$ ...

 
  What I did was checked the voip-info.org wiki on modem based FXOs and
  then searched ebay for modems listed with the correct chipsets. I
  lucked out and found one for $2.00 (with shipping I think it cost me
  $8.00 total). Mine is shows up as a Motorola X100 (or something to
  that effect). Seems to work fine, although I wasn't able to get
  Caller-ID working correctly (but I think that was a settings issue
  and I stopped pursuing it as it wasn't important for my pitching
  Asterisk).

 I don't recall any special issues with caller ID with X100P.

 --
Tzafrir Cohen
 icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 +972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] voicemail and ip phones

2006-12-29 Thread Doug Crompton
What type of phone are you using? On my Grandstream 200 under the Account
tab there is an item called voicemail ID This is the extension your
would call to retrieve voicemail. In my case it is extension 80, so I have
just 80 entered there. when I push the messages button on the phone it
immediately connects me to voicemail for the extension I am calling from.
You can set it up so all extensions are on the same voicemail or grouped
according to your wishes. This is done in sip.conf (mailbox=) and in
voicemail.conf to define mailboxes. Incoming messages for the associated
mailbox will light the mesassge waiting indicator on the phone.

Doug

On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, Giedrius Augys wrote:

 Hi,
   In my ip phone is voicemail indicator, and also is a voicemail button (to
 access to voicemail server and ant to listen voicemail). My question is how
 to configure this button. In configuration I need to enter URL. What is the
 syntax of this URL, that IP Phone could fetch this voicemail from asterisk.



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Checking voicemail from outside

2006-12-28 Thread Doug Crompton
Or more likely the tone may not be getting to asterisk. What FXO are you
using? External FXO's like the SPA3000 often need to be set to 'inband'
DTMF - both in sip.config and in the device's config and be sure to
restart Asterisk after doing this..

Easiest way to test this is to call yourself from your cell and see if you
can hear the DTMF tones on the Asterisk side as you enter them on your
cell. If you can not hear them then Asterisk won't decode them!

This is also necesssary for outgoing FXO calls to enable use of external
IVR's like banking and business voice menus.

There is much about this on this list in the past and in Asterisk bug
reports. It is not exactly clear where the problem lies but it appears to
be a combination of Asterisk and the SPA3000. This might be fixed in
version 1.4 but I have not heard any reports as yet.

Doug

On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, mitcheloc wrote:

 You could be using an older version of Asterisk that doesn't support it?

 On 12/28/06, Phil Finkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Rob,
 
  Interestingly enough, I'm using that same sample macro, and that line is
  indeed in there, yet when I hit *, I hear the tone to leave a message.  Any
  ideas?
 
  Phil
 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] UPDATE - Analog Phones with FSK/Stutter MWI

2006-12-23 Thread Doug Crompton
Not that I know of. I guess you could speed dial but then my Asterisk
voicemail is 80 so how hard is it to pick up the phone and dial that. I
never had phone company voicemail on a wired line so I don't know how that
works but I suspect you have to dial your own 7 digit or 10 digit
number???

Doug

On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Bob Chiodini wrote:

 Doug,

 Thanks for the info.  I'm glad it works.


 One question:  Is there some sort of one-button way to dial in to your
 voicemail?  It seems I read something about it, when I was doing similar
 research?  I think it was the Uniden CLX-465, which claims support of
 Phone Company voicemail.  I could not find one locally, however.

 Happy Holidays

 Bob...



 Doug Crompton wrote:
   After purchasing the Uniden TRU9480 and then the Panansonic 5672, both of
  which do not have phone company compatible FSK/stutter MWI, I finally
  got smart and found out just which Panasonic phones have this feature.
 
  Only the following 5.8G models in their current line have FXO compatible
  MWI. I purchased the 5771 unit and one remote. I have confimed it does in
  fact work with Asterisk and my SPA-3000. When there is a message waiting
  both the LCD display and a flashing indicator on the phone alert you. This
  is true for all extensions on the system, up to 8.
 
  These work with both FSK and Stutter tone. I did not turn on the tone MWI
  as the FSK worked fine.
 
 
  KX-TG5776S 5.8 GHz FHSS GigaRange. Expandable Digital Cordless Answering
  System with a 1.5 Full-Color (65k Color Capable) Backlit LCD on Handset
  $119.95
 
 
  KX-TG5771S 5.8 GHz FHSS GigaRange. Expandable Digital Cordless Answering
  System with Talking Caller ID $99.95
 
 
  KX-TG5622M 5.8 GHz FHSS GigaRange Dual-Handset Phone System $89.95
 
 
  KX-TG5761S 5.8 GHz FHSS GigaRange Expandable Digital Cordless Phone with
  Talking Caller ID $89.95
 
  In order for the external MWI to work you must turn on the message
  indicator and for units that have answering machines the machine must be
  turned off.
 
  Perhaps we could put together a list of analog phones that have this
  feature. I have been told that both Uniden and ATT have models that work
  but I have no knowledge of all that do in their entire line.
 
  Each brand has their own features and while the Panasonic is solid - I had
  a 2.4G system for years and really liked it - the Unidens seems to have
  more for the money but in this case not MWI.
 
  I guess you could tell I really wanted this MWI to work!
 
  Doug
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-22 Thread Doug Crompton
Wow what a mess! I can imagine how much easier it would be if the world
adopted a country/area/exchange scheme like in the US with known length.
It must be complicated in Germany just within the country. At least in the
US we know what the length should be so if we don't have that we know the
number is in error.

Doug


On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:

 Am Freitag, den 22.12.2006, 00:53 -0500 schrieb Doug Crompton:
  Question... What is the purpose of the + before the number? Does anyone
  actually have to enter it? If so how would you do it? It is not used in
  the US but do I see it come in on SIP lines CID. I assume the CID ignores
  it in the number as I do not see it on the display. It is however stored
  in asterisk and when doing CID comparisions it can be a problem.

 The + is replaced by the telco you are connected to - by whatever the
 local prefix for international call is. In the US and  Canada it will
 be 011, in most parts of the world 00, and there is Russia with its
 exotic 08 wait for beep 10... The + should work in GSM mobile
 networks and most SIP providers seem to accept it.

 For callerid, there seem to be several cases. One of my providers (the
 others manage better and always give 00492281234567 formatted numbers)
 gives CID as +491601234567 for calls from one German mobile network,
 491637654321 from a second network and 02281234567 from landline, so
 my dialplan has to cope with that such that my endpoints show the proper
 number. This is done by the following logic:

 If number begins with +, strip it.
 If number begins with anything but 0, prepend 00.
 If number begins with 0049, replace by 0.

 Although in Germany you can dial 0049 (region) (number), readability
 is better when there is only the 0 (region) (number) on the display -
 especially as numbers tend to get long, and e.g. Grandstream BT-100 only
 have a 12-digit display.

 BTW the longest number I _think_ is planned in Germany is 9 digits after
 the area code for 2- and 3-digit area codes, 8 for 4-, and 7 for 5-digit
 areacodes. There is one exception though that I know of: One of our
 ministeries has usually 55- numbers (55 being their number, then
 four digits DDI), but their fax numbers are 8-digit. Thus resulting in
 total in 011-49-228-55-87654321 from US, 18 digits.

 If you can, leave room for long numbers.

 BR
 Anselm

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Need quality toll free 800 number over IAX?

2006-12-22 Thread Doug Crompton
If this (or any) company is really stealing or not living up to a contract
then why not report them as such, especially if they are US based. I would
suspect you would have another route to take.

If you don't do anything about it then they will just go on abusing
others and getting away with it.

At the very least the BBB (bbb.org) should be notified. They have a web
site and if it is really wire/internet fraud then the FBI
(www.fbi.gov/majcases/fraud/internetschemes.htm) has a site you can
register a complaint with.

Perhaps there should (or maybe there is) be a site that rates these
companies. If someone really wants business then they will do their best
to get on the top of the list.

Doug


On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Kevin Walsh wrote:

 Andrew Joakimsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  NuFone isnt bad if you want a disposable termination account. But don't rely
  on it for anything.
 
 Well, the voice quality left a lot to be desired, so I didn't make a
 lot of use of the service anyway.  Perhaps, if I had made more use of
 it, they wouldn't have been able to steal as much from me when I fired
 them for incompetence, laziness and general rudeness.

 Perhaps they think that if they rob enough people then they will be
 in a better position to pay their upstream provider - leading to less
 downtime and therefore less cause for customers to attempt to contact
 the idiot running their support department (Jeremy).

 They are in urgent need of a better business plan (one that doesn't
 rely upon raising money by stealing funds from customer accounts) and
 a complete change of staff.  Oh, and a clue!

 --
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/  _/_/
   _/_/_/   _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/  _/   K e v i n   W a l s h
  _/ _/_/  _/ _/ _/_/  _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Need quality toll free 800 number over IAX?

2006-12-22 Thread Doug Crompton
Well if this company is US based I would not think where you are matters
if it is fraud. You could still enter a complaint at the FBI site.

I would also think they would be working with the UK counterpart.

Doug

On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Kevin Walsh wrote:

 Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  If this (or any) company is really stealing or not living up to a contract
  then why not report them as such, especially if they are US based. I would
  suspect you would have another route to take.
 
 I am UK-based - there's not a lot I can do to a US-based company,
 and they know it.  That is unless I'm willing to fly over there to
 sue them, which I'm not.  In this case, it was better to just cut
 our losses and make sure as many others as possible know about our
 experience and are forewarned.

 I have already convinced several others to abandon NuFone.  I was
 the one who recommended them in the first place, so I felt that I
 had to warn them and try my best to persuade them to migrate.

 Remember - sometimes, when you annoy one customer, you loose a lot
 more than just that one customer.  Whatever playground victory NuFone
 thinks they won by helping themselves to the content of our account,
 they lost hundreds of times over in terms of the future revenue from
 the customers I know that they lost.

 
  If you don't do anything about it then they will just go on abusing
  others and getting away with it.
 
 That's why I feel it is right and proper to warn others.

 If NuFone carries on operating they way they do, they will lose a
 lot more than just the customers we had powers of persuasion over.
 The snowball effect induced by mounting bad publicity is a powerful
 thing, and not something any company wants to be on the receiving end
 of.

 I know that I have caused more damage this way than I could ever do by
 simply recovering the account balance in court, and I didn't have to fly
 anywhere to do it.  NuFone's short-sighted and clearly criminal ways
 will come back to haunt them one day.

 
  At the very least the BBB (bbb.org) should be notified. They have a web
  site and if it is really wire/internet fraud then the FBI
  (www.fbi.gov/majcases/fraud/internetschemes.htm) has a site you can
  register a complaint with.
 
 I've never heard of the BBB.  I have now - thanks.  I doubt that
 NuFone's behaviour counts as fraud though.  I'd class their actions
 as just plain old-fashioned theft.

 If you are a NuFone customer then I advise you to use up your balance
 and leave as soon as possible.  It's very easy to do - especially if
 you're only using a company as an outgoing route and don't need to port
 a number to a new provider.  If you know any NuFone customers then you
 should try to get them to do the same.

 --
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/  _/_/
   _/_/_/   _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/  _/   K e v i n   W a l s h
  _/ _/_/  _/ _/ _/_/  _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] UPDATE - Analog Phones with FSK/Stutter MWI

2006-12-22 Thread Doug Crompton

 After purchasing the Uniden TRU9480 and then the Panansonic 5672, both of
which do not have phone company compatible FSK/stutter MWI, I finally
got smart and found out just which Panasonic phones have this feature.

Only the following 5.8G models in their current line have FXO compatible
MWI. I purchased the 5771 unit and one remote. I have confimed it does in
fact work with Asterisk and my SPA-3000. When there is a message waiting
both the LCD display and a flashing indicator on the phone alert you. This
is true for all extensions on the system, up to 8.

These work with both FSK and Stutter tone. I did not turn on the tone MWI
as the FSK worked fine.


KX-TG5776S 5.8 GHz FHSS GigaRange. Expandable Digital Cordless Answering
System with a 1.5 Full-Color (65k Color Capable) Backlit LCD on Handset
$119.95


KX-TG5771S 5.8 GHz FHSS GigaRange. Expandable Digital Cordless Answering
System with Talking Caller ID $99.95


KX-TG5622M 5.8 GHz FHSS GigaRange Dual-Handset Phone System $89.95


KX-TG5761S 5.8 GHz FHSS GigaRange Expandable Digital Cordless Phone with
Talking Caller ID $89.95

In order for the external MWI to work you must turn on the message
indicator and for units that have answering machines the machine must be
turned off.

Perhaps we could put together a list of analog phones that have this
feature. I have been told that both Uniden and ATT have models that work
but I have no knowledge of all that do in their entire line.

Each brand has their own features and while the Panasonic is solid - I had
a 2.4G system for years and really liked it - the Unidens seems to have
more for the money but in this case not MWI.

I guess you could tell I really wanted this MWI to work!

Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Insert 1+areacode for VOIP calls

2006-12-21 Thread Doug Crompton


; Dial wether long distance is preceeded by 1 or not
; Dial LD via gizmo
exten = _1NXXNXX,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],120,T)
exten = _1NXXNXX,2,Macro(failann,${DIALSTATUS})
exten = _NXXNXX,1,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],120,T)
exten = _NXXNXX,2,Macro(failann,${DIALSTATUS})


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] International dialplans for Asterisk?

2006-12-21 Thread Doug Crompton
Question... What is the purpose of the + before the number? Does anyone
actually have to enter it? If so how would you do it? It is not used in
the US but do I see it come in on SIP lines CID. I assume the CID ignores
it in the number as I do not see it on the display. It is however stored
in asterisk and when doing CID comparisions it can be a problem.

Doug


On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Michiel van Baak wrote:

 The above number looks like:
 +31318787243

 Try to get that from your telco, it makes life way more
 easy.
 --

 Michiel van Baak
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://michiel.vanbaak.eu

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Match a Numer - then continue with dialplan

2006-12-20 Thread Doug Crompton
I haven't really been following this thread but doesn't the following
snipet kinda do this

[out-international]
exten = _011,1,goto(process-international,s,1)

[process-international]

exten = s,1,playback(international-call)
exten = s,n,playback(please-enter-the)
exten = s,n,read(number,number)
exten = s,n,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],120,T)
exten = s,n,Macro(failann,${DIALSTATUS})


This matches 011 then could do any number of things. Here I just goto,
then it looks for more numbers (the announcement is optional) and then
dials them.

Maybe not what you are looking for but it is an example of Asterisk
matching an extension and then going on to take more digits that then
branch based on other digits. Here the 011 is prepended to the final
number.

BTW - what is a numer?

Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Newbie Questions - Grandstorm phones?

2006-12-20 Thread Doug Crompton
Anthony,

 Ok I understand. The 011 is unique though and I guess the problem is
the length of the remaining digits. This could vary based on country?? and
I suspect there is no unique rule that could be applied??? I have not
studied this but is there any uniqness to the remaining digits?

Doug


On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Anthony Kepler wrote:

 I have been using an approach such as this but am looking for something
 else because of some limitations it has.  The phone thinks it dialed,
 and was connected to 011 (which it was)
 As such, that will be stored in the phones dial history (redial if
 nothing else).
 I'm not even certain what I want is possible, which is why I'm asking
 the list.

 Thank you for your help once again though.

- Anthony Kepler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | SIP/EMail

 Doug Crompton wrote:
  Well that is certainly an option but not all phones would have a send key
  especially if you are using analog phones. I guess the # keys
  functions in
  that way on many of those.
 
  I still like my wired phones to work like they use to. You dial a
  number
  and it executes the call immediately.
 
  Ok I came up with one that I think would work, maybe needs some
  refinement
 
  [out-international]
  exten = _011,1,goto(process-international,s,1)
 
  [process-international]
 
  exten = s,1,read(number)
  exten = s,2,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],120,T)
  exten = s,3,Macro(failann,${DIALSTATUS})
 
  This accepts the 011 prefix and then any number of following digits.
  Terminator is timeout period OR # key to send. Change obviously for your
  provider.
 
  The read command has many options including saying a file. You could for
  instance hear Country Code after dialing 011. This would clue you into
  the fact that you  were dialing and international call. There are also
  digit limits and timeouts that can be set.
 
  So if you use early dial this would be the only rule that would require a
  wait or # key to send. I could certainly live with that.
 
  Can anyone supply some international test numbers??? Say in the UK or
  Germany or wherever outside the US.
 
  Doug
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Match a Numer - then continue with, dialplan

2006-12-20 Thread Doug Crompton
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Michael Collins wrote:

 After listing all of that, then give us the description of what needs to
 happen next, the part about deciding which caller ID info to send.
 Pretend like you're explaining it to a bunch of idiots who understand
 only small words and short sentences. :)


Damn, I didn't know Bush was subscribed to this list!

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Calls disconnected after 1 hour

2006-12-20 Thread Doug Crompton
Sounds like a provider or equipment (FXO/FXS call timer) issue. What are
the specs of your system?

Doug

On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Klaverstyn, David C wrote:

 There seems to be something in Asterisk that disconnects the call at 1
 hour.



 At 59 minutes there is a beep then 1 minute later the call is dropped.





 I have a basic install Asterisk Ver. 1.2.13.  I have not specifically
 said that calls are to be disconnected at a certain time (not that I
 know how to do that).






Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Newbie Questions - Grandstorm phones?

2006-12-19 Thread Doug Crompton
Early dial is a real nice feature BUT it requires that you carefully plan
and design your extensions. Each digit is accepeted by Asterisk and if a
match exists up to that point it will be accepted and dialed.

As an example, my internal extensions are 4xx and my internal special
extensions are 5xx. I chose those because they do not conflict with local
area codes or other first 3 digit sequences.

However if a call come in from, say, area code 512 (without the 1
prepended), and I have a local 512 extension, I would not be able to dial
that person back. It would instead go to the local 512, as this is
satisfied first.

Often callerID does not come in with the 1 before the area code. This is
what prompted me to put code in to append a 1 if none existed on the
incoming callerID. With the 1 appended there is no problem as 151 does not
match any local extension and I can use redial without problems.

Using 4 digit extensions would mostly eliminate this problem although you
still could not use 1xxx extensions.

Wildcard extension matches like X. or using the '.' anywhere in the
matches would not work.

You just have to use it and fix things as they come up. I think I have
most all cases trapped now!

Doug



On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Anthony Kepler wrote:

 Do you, Gordon or Doug, happen to place international calls with
 early-dial enabled?  What kind of extensions.conf magic do you work to
 allow this?
 I have been trying for some time to get this to work.  (My message from
 2006.11.03 regarding this is quoted just below)

  On 11/3/06, *Anthony Kepler* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I am trying to allow users to
  place outgoing international calls from a
  GXP-2000 with early dial enabled, connected to Asterisk 1.2.12.1
  http://1.2.12.1
  I have the following extension line:
  exten = _011.,n,Dial(${TRUNK}/${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}})
 
  When I attempt to place a call to a number in, for instance, Kenya, I
  dial 011254...etc.
  and I get this on the asterisk console:
  Executing Dial(SIP/1001-081fb718, Zap/g1/0112) in new stack
 -- Called g1/0112
 
  It is attempting to dial out as soon as it receives a single digit to
  represent the .
  What I need is for it to wait a reasonable amount of time for additional
  digits.
  I have tried using set(TIMEOUT(digit)=5), and I see the following in the
  asterisk console:
 -- Executing Set(SIP/1001-081fb718, TIMEOUT(digit)=5) in new stack
 -- Digit timeout set to 5
  However, this is printed far less than 5 seconds before the dial out
  attempt.
 
  I assume there must be something relatively obvious I'm missing here...
  if anyone can shed some light on this, it would be greatly appreciated.
 
 
  Thank you,
 - Anthony Kepler
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | SIP/Email


 Gordon Henderson wrote:
  On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Doug Crompton wrote:
 
 
  On the Budgetone 200 it is in the account tab settings of the web setup
  and it does work here with asterisk and my dialplans..
 
 
  On the GPX2000's it's via the web interface under each of the 4 Line
  configuration tabs. (so you'd have to set it on each account you were
  using on the phone)
 
  Gordon
 
 
  Doug
 
  On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, [iso-8859-1] Jes?s M?ndez Rom?n wrote:
 
 
  Hi,
 
  Where can I find that option?
 
  Thanks
  Jesus
 
  -Mensaje original-
  De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Gordon
  Henderson
  Enviado el: Jueves, 02 de Noviembre de 2006 11:44 a.m.
  Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
  Non-Commercial Discussion
  Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Newbie Questions - Grandstorm phones?
 
  On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Henry.L.Coleman wrote:
 
 
  I came to the same conclusion.
  There is one thing however that the GXP2000 needs in my opinion.
  There is no dial plan avaiable in the configuration, this means that when
  dialing a number there is a slight delay before it actually dials.
  With a dial plan the dialed number is sent immeadiately the pattern is
  match ed so it saves a second or two. Maybe they will fix this?
 
  Set the Early Dial option - it's on a per-line basis, then as soon
  as Asterisk gets a number it can dial, it will. No need to wait the 4
  seconds or press the send button...
 
  Gordon
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 




Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954

Re: [asterisk-users] Changing CALLERIDNUM on the fly

2006-12-19 Thread Doug Crompton
Thanks Anselm, That did it!

Doug

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:

 Am Dienstag, den 19.12.2006, 01:11 -0500 schrieb Doug Crompton:
  Is what I am trying to do in this context possible. That is changing the
  incoming CALLERIDNUM. In this case if the incoming CALLERIDNUM is not
  preceeded by a 1 I want to add a 1. Often calls come in without the
  preceeding 1 and this plays havoc with my redial if the 3 digit area
  code matches a local 3 digit extension. All my outside calls are 10 digits
  or 1+10 digits.
 
  Doug
 
 
  [from-pstn]
  exten = s,1,set(TEST=${CALLERIDNUM::1}) test for first digit1
  exten = s,2,GotoIf($[ ${TEST} = 1 ]?4:3)
  exten = s,3,set(__CALLERIDNUM=1${CALLERIDNUM})   if not add 1
  exten = s,4,noop(${CALLERIDNUM})   and this still displays without

 Replace CALLERIDNUM with CALLERID(num) on all occasions, and you will
 not need underscores because this is a special variable anyway.
 CALLERIDNUM is obsolete.

 You could get along with one line less:
 exten = s,1,GotoIf($[A${CALLERID(num):0:1} = A1]?3:2)
 exten = s,2,Set(CALLERID(num)=1${CALLERID(num)})
 exten = s,3,NOOP(Continue in Dialplan)

 Note that my GotoIf contains the two additional A letters which is
 important to avoid syntax errors if the CALLERID(num) is empty for
 whatever reason. I do not know what ends up in your CALLERID(num) if the
 number of the caller is not available (like anonymous or withheld) -
 anyway, with this statement it will end up being prepended by 1. You
 migth want to have a special case for that.

 If your phones happen to also display CALLERID(name) you can use this to
 lookup the phone number in a phone book (here in Germany there is an
 online service for number reverse lookup which works for about 50% of my
 callers) and set the variable.

 BR
 Anselm

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Newbie Questions - Grandstorm phones?

2006-12-19 Thread Doug Crompton
Sorry, I did not read the original message completely. The answer is no I
do not make international calls. I do not know anyone in any other country
to call! I do not have a rule for that but it should be easy to implement
as 01x would not match anything I currently have for early dial. Would you
always dial a 0 first for all international mumbers? Give me an example?

Are you outside the US? If so give me your number and I will try it!

Doug

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Anthony Kepler wrote:

 I understand how early dial works (484 response and all that jazz), I
 also understand the NANP and how to keep my extensions from
 overlapping... but thank you for the tips.

 My question was:  Do you place international calls from phones with
 early-dial enabled?
 If so, might you be willing to share the relevant portions of your dial
 plan that are concerned with placing said international calls?

 Thanks again,
 - Anthony Kepler
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | SIP/Email


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Newbie Questions - Grandstorm phones?

2006-12-19 Thread Doug Crompton
Well that is certainly an option but not all phones would have a send key
especially if you are using analog phones. I guess the # keys functions in
that way on many of those.

I still like my wired phones to work like they use to. You dial a number
and it executes the call immediately.

Ok I came up with one that I think would work, maybe needs some
refinement

[out-international]
exten = _011,1,goto(process-international,s,1)

[process-international]

exten = s,1,read(number)
exten = s,2,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED],120,T)
exten = s,3,Macro(failann,${DIALSTATUS})

This accepts the 011 prefix and then any number of following digits.
Terminator is timeout period OR # key to send. Change obviously for your
provider.

The read command has many options including saying a file. You could for
instance hear Country Code after dialing 011. This would clue you into
the fact that you  were dialing and international call. There are also
digit limits and timeouts that can be set.

So if you use early dial this would be the only rule that would require a
wait or # key to send. I could certainly live with that.

Can anyone supply some international test numbers??? Say in the UK or
Germany or wherever outside the US.

Doug

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Gordon Henderson wrote:

 On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Anthony Kepler wrote:

  Do you, Gordon or Doug, happen to place international calls with early-dial
  enabled?  What kind of extensions.conf magic do you work to allow this?
  I have been trying for some time to get this to work.  (My message from
  2006.11.03 regarding this is quoted just below)

 Not me ( I'm in the UK FWIW).

 I'm trying to get my users into thinking of the phones in the same terms
 as they'd treat their mobiles - so get them to dial the full area code
 starting with a zero (no 9 for outside line here, although I do support it
 in addition to zero), and then pushing the send key after they have
 entered the number... My reasoning for this is that it then mimics the way
 they use their mobiles, (and who doesn't have a mobile these days?) and
 you can dial the full number in the UK anyway without incuring any cost or
 call routing issues (just time to dial the 4 or 5 digit prefix)

 Gordon


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Changing CALLERIDNUM on the fly

2006-12-18 Thread Doug Crompton
Is what I am trying to do in this context possible. That is changing the
incoming CALLERIDNUM. In this case if the incoming CALLERIDNUM is not
preceeded by a 1 I want to add a 1. Often calls come in without the
preceeding 1 and this plays havoc with my redial if the 3 digit area
code matches a local 3 digit extension. All my outside calls are 10 digits
or 1+10 digits.

Doug


[from-pstn]
exten = s,1,set(TEST=${CALLERIDNUM::1}) test for first digit1
exten = s,2,GotoIf($[ ${TEST} = 1 ]?4:3)
exten = s,3,set(__CALLERIDNUM=1${CALLERIDNUM})   if not add 1
exten = s,4,noop(${CALLERIDNUM})   and this still displays without


I tried no, one and two underscores with the CALLERIDNUM variable.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FYI Panasonic Wireless Phone MWI

2006-12-17 Thread Doug Crompton
Yes I was very specific. Go back to my original post - search Panasonic
MWI - I described what I said and gave a link to the Panasonic specs for
this phone which clearly states that the MWI light blinks with new
messages and that phone company subscription to VM is required.

I did not mention Asterisk because if it works with phone company VM it
would work with Asterisk, assuming the FXO you were using was capable and
setup correctly.

Doug

On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Steve Prior wrote:

 Noah Miller wrote:
  Last week I asked about MWI indicators on wireless phones that would work
  with Asterisk. I sent a message off to Panasonic asking them about it
  because in their ads they specifically stated that the indicator works
  with and requires phone company voicemail subscription.
 
   That indicator will not work for your
   voicemail. We do not have any phone system that has a message alert
   indicator that will work both for your voicemail and your answering
   machine.

 How exactly did you phrase the question to their tech support?  If you
 described Asterisk as an answering machine then you'd get the wrong
 answer.  If you described Asterisk as a PBX which provides a signal just
 like a telco voicemail would, then the answer would make sense.

 Steve
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] FYI Panasonic Wireless Phone MWI

2006-12-16 Thread Doug Crompton
Well it is not clear - their ads say one thing and they say another. At
best there is confusion. If you really like the phone you could buy it
somewhere where you could take it back and check it when you get it.

Doug

On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Noah Miller wrote:

  Last week I asked about MWI indicators on wireless phones that would work
  with Asterisk. I sent a message off to Panasonic asking them about it
  because in their ads they specifically stated that the indicator works
  with and requires phone company voicemail subscription.
 
   That indicator will not work for your
   voicemail. We do not have any phone system that has a message alert
   indicator that will work both for your voicemail and your answering
   machine.

 Thanks Doug!  That's good to know.  I need to buy some analog cordless
 phones, and that one was on my list.  Now I can scratch it off.  If it
 helps, I have an ATT cordless that does have a working MWI indicator.
  The model is 9345.  It's one of their very low-end basic models, so
 I'm guessing the better models would support MWI, too.

 - Noah
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] FYI Panasonic Wireless Phone MWI

2006-12-14 Thread Doug Crompton
Last week I asked about MWI indicators on wireless phones that would work
with Asterisk. I sent a message off to Panasonic asking them about it
because in their ads they specifically stated that the indicator works
with and requires phone company voicemail subscription.

The is the model TG5631.

Specs here...

http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-KX-TG5631S-GigaRange-Cordless-Answering/dp/B000F4C2CA

and this was the response

Go figure!

Dear MR CROMPTON

Thank you for contacting Panasonic.

The purpose of the message button of your phone system is to inform you
that you have new
messages in your answering system.  That indicator will not work for your
voicemail. We do not have any phone system that has a message alert
indicator that will work both for your voicemail and your answering
machine.

We hope this information is useful to you.

Thank You,
Panasonic Consumer Support


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Asterisk, Bluetooth, and wireless phone

2006-12-13 Thread Doug Crompton
With most of the new wireless phones now Bluetooth is anyone interfacing
(pairing) them to Asterisk? It would be nice to just plop the phone down
near the computer and have home phone access to it. I would be interested
in hardware that might be used for this? I have a Bluetooth phone but not
an interface for the computer.

Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Phone routing - curious what others are doing?

2006-12-13 Thread Doug Crompton
I just went through an exercise of writing a Perl script called from my
Asterisk dialplan to look at a list of area codes and exchanges to
determine which ones are local (no or little cost) under my current
Verizon plan. I route calls outside of my local limits to Gizmo. It works
fine but when I called Verizon to change (lower) my service it was a
bewildering spider web of rates structures just in the Philadelphia
metropolitan area. It made me wonder why I send any of my calls to
Verizon! I was able to cut my Verizon cost down by about half.

I wonder if any others are splitting calls like this or just biting the
bullet and going 100% voip???

With Asterisk/Gizmo I have a local DID for $30/year plus I put $10 credit
on callout last June and I still have $3 left. I prefer pay as you go
rather than flat rate which at $20 or more a month would (for me) be a
$150/year waste! When you have a Gizmo DID the callout CID is
automatically the DID number. You can request a different number though as
long as you have control of it.

Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 5.8gig phone MWI

2006-12-09 Thread Doug Crompton
Well that is not exactly true. I nelieve it was clear as Steve stated
below that his Uniden MWI does work with Asterisk. Many phones advertise
compatibility with phone company MWI. Often people use phone company VM
and then have stuttered dialtone as well as FSK signaling to tell the user
there is a message waiting. There are definitely phones that will do this
I am just trying to fine out which ones do and actually work! Asterisk
through many FXS's would send this same signal.

Doug

On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Tom Lynn wrote:

 You're trying to teach a pig to sing.  The uniden items you refer to
 probably have their own internal answering machine, mine does.  It's
 designed to light the lamp only when it's own machine has a message.

 On 12/8/06, Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Thanks, but unfortunately that is an expensive 2 line phone compared to
  others in their line that have a base and two or three remotes for the
  same price. Seems a lot to pay for a MWI.
 
  I wonder if anyone has had experience with panasonic wireless 5.8gig and
  MWI?? They advertise compatibility on some models but I also saw a review
  comment that it did not work.
 
  Doug
 
  On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Steve Prior wrote:
 
   Doug Crompton wrote:
  
Does anyone have personal experience with a 5.8gig wireless phone
  (system)
that has an MWI that WORKS with asterisk via fxs (in my case spa3k)
generated MWI. I know the spa3k does stuttered dialtone but not sure
  if it
generates FSK MWI.
   
I see some that state they do but I also see reviews that say they
  don't.
   
Doug
  
   I've tested the MWI with the Uniden TRU-8866 phone and it works for me.
   I've tested it with the Digium TDM400P FXS.
  
   Steve

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 5.8gig phone MWI

2006-12-09 Thread Doug Crompton

The ad at this Panasonic site is what is so confusing. They mention a MWI
on the phone, which has a digital answering machine as part of the system.
Then in the text they mention the MWI requires phone company subscription
to voice mail.

http://www2.panasonic.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/vModelDetail?storeId=15001catalogId=13401itemId=96903catGroupId=25039modelNo=KX-TG5671S

Doug

On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Steve Prior wrote:

 Tom Lynn wrote:
  You're trying to teach a pig to sing.  The uniden items you refer to
  probably have their own internal answering machine, mine does.  It's
  designed to light the lamp only when it's own machine has a message.

 You're giving out totally incorrect information.  The TRU-8866 unit
 I mentioned is a 2 line unit (which I wanted), but does NOT have a built
 in answering machine (which I didn't want).  Uniden seems to offer
 models with and without answering machine function.  However, despite
 the fact that it does not have a built in answering machine, the
 handsets and base unit both support MWI.

 I believe that Uniden does make a single line version of this phone, and
 I bet it also supports MWI - especially since they've standardized their
 handsets to be universal across their latest line.

 Steve
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] 5.8gig phone MWI

2006-12-08 Thread Doug Crompton
Does anyone have personal experience with a 5.8gig wireless phone (system)
that has an MWI that WORKS with asterisk via fxs (in my case spa3k)
generated MWI. I know the spa3k does stuttered dialtone but not sure if it
generates FSK MWI.

I see some that state they do but I also see reviews that say they don't.

Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 5.8gig phone MWI

2006-12-08 Thread Doug Crompton
Thanks, but unfortunately that is an expensive 2 line phone compared to
others in their line that have a base and two or three remotes for the
same price. Seems a lot to pay for a MWI.

I wonder if anyone has had experience with panasonic wireless 5.8gig and
MWI?? They advertise compatibility on some models but I also saw a review
comment that it did not work.

Doug

On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Steve Prior wrote:

 Doug Crompton wrote:

  Does anyone have personal experience with a 5.8gig wireless phone (system)
  that has an MWI that WORKS with asterisk via fxs (in my case spa3k)
  generated MWI. I know the spa3k does stuttered dialtone but not sure if it
  generates FSK MWI.
 
  I see some that state they do but I also see reviews that say they don't.
 
  Doug

 I've tested the MWI with the Uniden TRU-8866 phone and it works for me.
 I've tested it with the Digium TDM400P FXS.

 Steve
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Is there any Asterisk controllable thermostat?

2006-12-07 Thread Doug Crompton
John,

 Two questions on your comments

 I have no seen an Insteon computer controller similiar to the old bottle
rocket. Is there such a device? I am thinking of getting an Insteon
starter kit bit I have so many X10 devices it will be awhie before, if
ever, that I get it all changed over. Many items, like spotlights, are not
available in Insteon.

I would be interested in the Ethernet MWI. I am using many phones on an
SPA3000 fxs and I can't seem to find an MWI on an analog phone that works
with Asterisk and the SPA3000, although I have been told that there are
some that do??? The quick answer would be to put a SIP phone with MWI
where your wife wants to be able to see the light. I have a Budgtone 200
and MWI works fine on it. Of course then you have styling and color issues
that might not past the muster.

Doug

On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, John Marvin wrote:


 I would suggest that people who don't already have an investment in home
 automation equipment should look at Insteon rather than X10. Insteon is
 a next generation version of X10 that provides backwards compatibility
 with X10. The devices are a little more expensive, but not as expensive
 as some of the other alternatives. Insteon provides 2 way communication
 and is a lot more reliable than X10.

 If you already have an investment in X10 devices you can slowly convert
 to Insteon, since Insteon provides backwards compatibility, i.e. X10
 controllers can control Insteon devices and Insteon controllers can
 control X10 devices, however you won't get all the advantages of Insteon
 until you have Insteon controllers controlling Insteon devices.

 For people with some soldering and basic circuit design skills, you may
 want to consider using ethernet as a home automation bus for some
 things. I love the Olimex PIC WEB and PIC Mini Web development boards
 (they cost $49.95 and $39.95 respectively). They have an ethernet port
 and an expansion connector for the available PIC I/O pins. Microchip
 provides a free C compiler for Pic processors, and they also have an
 open source networking stack that works on the Olimex boards. So with a
 ribbon cable connector and a small breadboard with a few IC's and/or
 driver transistors you can build a device that responds to commands via
 the network (or via a built in web server) from your Asterisk server
 that does about any task you can think of. Lots of fun ... I'm currently
 building a voicemail indicator (my wife didn't like me taking her
 answering machine away with the blinking lights when we switched to
 Asterisk voicemail) using a PIC Web board. Next project will be a web
 based sprinkler controller.

 John
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Is there any Asterisk controllable thermostat?

2006-12-05 Thread Doug Crompton
I suggest you get the code I mentioned in my last message - it is c/c++
code and as is usually the case with Linux, all the source code is there.
Looking at examples is a great way to learn.

Doug

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Zeeshan Zakaria wrote:

 What skills are needed to write a code yourself for X10, RS-485 or RS-232. I
 am planning to learn some programming so I can do the stuff myself which
 others haven't done yet. I once knew C/C++, and other electronic stuff, but
 because of not using it for years, revise and update them.



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Is there any Asterisk controllable thermostat?

2006-12-04 Thread Doug Crompton
I remembered I had an x10 bottlerocket in my X10 junkbox so I connected it
to a spare serial port on my linux server (asterisk resides there) and
implemented with some mods the code mentioned earlier

http://lorance.freeshell.org/asterisk/#asterisk-can-control-the-world

and it works great. Now I have one more way to control X10 devices. I can
even call my VM on the way home and turn on my lights or whatever before I
get home.

Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4beta3 help

2006-12-01 Thread Doug Crompton
No, no menuslect on system beside *

I unzipped it, ran configure, then make (or make menuselect) they both
give the same immediate error 3.

From what I see with 1.4.x  it might be good to have a completely seperste
list. I suspect there will be tons of email volume once it's use or
attempt of use ramps up!

Doug

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Tim Panton wrote:


 On 1 Dec 2006, at 03:49, Doug Crompton wrote:

  no - make menuselect -  does the same thing.

 Have you got a (non asterisk) binary or shell script called
 menuselect in your path?

 try

 which menuselect

 Tim Panton

 www.mexuar.net
 www.westhawk.co.uk/



 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] spa3k dtmf problem asterisk 1.2.x

2006-12-01 Thread Doug Crompton
Anyone that uses the spa3k with Asterisk knows about the dtmf issues of
not being able to get tones properly to an IVR after call completion. You
can make it work by eliminating ALL special keys - transfer, etc. in the
dial and using inband signaling. This has been beat to death over the last
year.

My question is that there were patches to rtp.c that were an attempt to
correct. I tried a few to no avail. Does anyone have a patch that works?
I am currently using 1.2.13

My understand from googling this is that the problem is both a Sipura and
Asterisk problem, although more of the blame is put on Asterisk.

Also the rtp in 1.4 has been completely reworked. Has anyone tested this
with the spa3k? Unfortunately 1.4 is a significant change that involves a
great deal of time to test and is not at all like doing an upgrade within
1.2. So I am not inclined to go that route yet unless it fixes this
problem.

Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendation for FXO

2006-12-01 Thread Doug Crompton
I have an spa3000 and in general it is OK. I have the echo at acceptable
levels and often non-existent. The big grip is the failed rfc-2833. BUT it
might be more the fault of Asterisk - See

http://forum.voxilla.com/linksys-sipura-spa-users-group/dtmf-rfc2833-incompatibility-between-spa3000-asterisk-12306.html

and my previous (today) message to this list on spa3k

So other (external) devices may also not play well because of this
problem. Digium it seems is not real excited to do anything about this as
it is not an issue with their internal hardware and also 1.2.x is not on
the front burner with 1.4 out. 1.4 wwith it's complete rewrite of rtp code
might solve this issue. It is not clear as I have not seen an answer to my
previous question on that.

See...

http://www.voipsupply.com/index.php?cPath=96

for a listing of the external ata's. Grandstream has one, as does linksys
and others. I think they all have some issue. It is just picking the one
that has the least or the most bearable for you. Unfortunately this may
not become apparent until you get it and use it.

I too would be interested in trying another fxo/fxs as my only experience
is with Sipura.

Doug

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Martin Joseph wrote:

 Ok,

 I am back from my thanksgiving holiday,  and I find there was a big
 snow storm here in Seattle.  Apparently during the storm there where
 multiple brown out/black outs.

 I have struggled since day one to get a high quality PSTN gateway
 configured with my very long loop and Mac based asterisk.

 I originally tried the HT-488, which had multiple issues, and was
 unacceptable.  I then purchased the wellgate 3701a, which was much
 better, but lacked ANY support from the manufacturer, and had some
 other semi-minor problems (rfc2833 didn't work, never got caller id
 working, etc.).

 Now the power problems seems to have done something bad to the PSTN
 gateway, as it appears to be up and running,  but the gains are really
 whacked, and it's almost impossible to conduct a call through at this
 point.

 I tried hooking a handset directly to the PSTN line and that sounds fine.

 So,  I would like to purchase another PSTN gateway which WORKS WELL
 with asterisk.  I need it to hook up via ethernet, since my platform of
 choice (mac OSX) has no PCI card support.  I only have one PSTN line,
 and already have other ATA's for FXSs, so I really only need one FXO
 port, although I realize there is no such animal.

 Any positive experiences with FXO gateways that connect via ethernet?
 Especially with a long loop/echo issues (ie not SPA3000)?

 Thanks in advance.
 Marty

 PS I am ready to spend to buy something quality.


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4beta3 help

2006-12-01 Thread Doug Crompton
Ok Mine is probably old and not the right version.

locate ncurses

/lib/libncurses.so.4
/lib/libncurses.so.4.2
/lib/libncurses.so.5
/lib/libncurses.so.5.2
/usr/include/ncurses.h
/usr/include/ncurses_dll.h
/usr/lib/libncurses++.a
/usr/lib/libncurses.a
/usr/lib/libncurses.so
/usr/lib/libncurses.so.1.9
/usr/lib/libncurses.so.1.9.7a
/usr/lib/libncurses.so.2.1

as I am using a SUSE 7.3 system.

It is time for a system rebuild and upgrade and I will probably wait until
then to upgrade to 1.4 once there is an official release.

Just playing now!

Doug

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Anthony Rodgers wrote:

 IIRC, menuselect requires ncurses-devel (or your distro's equivalent).

 CP

 On Dec 1, 2006, at 7:05 AM, Doug Crompton wrote:

  No, no menuslect on system beside *
 
  I unzipped it, ran configure, then make (or make menuselect) they both
  give the same immediate error 3.
 
  From what I see with 1.4.x? it might be good to have a completely
  seperste
  list. I suspect there will be tons of email volume once it's use or
  attempt of use ramps up!
 
  Doug
 
  On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Tim Panton wrote:
 
  
   On 1 Dec 2006, at 03:49, Doug Crompton wrote:
  
no - make menuselect -? does the same thing.
  
   Have you got a (non asterisk) binary or shell script called
   menuselect in your path?
  
   try
  
   which menuselect
  
   Tim Panton
  
   www.mexuar.net
   www.westhawk.co.uk/
  
  
  
   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  ??? http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
 
  Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
  safety
  ?deserve neither liberty nor safety.? -- Ben Franklin (1759)
 
  
  *? Doug Crompton??? ?? *
  *? Richboro, PA 18954?? ?? *
  *? 215-431-6307 ??? ?? *
  *?? ??? ? ? ?? *
  * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
  * http://www.crompton.com? *
  
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  ?? http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4beta3 help

2006-12-01 Thread Doug Crompton
I am running an old SUSE 7.3 system, 2.4 kernel and glibc 2.2
I picked up the ncurses-devel rpm and it now requires glibc 2.3
I found a glibc 2.4 rpm but I am a little reluctent to install it. It
would be a disaster to lose this system.

Are there any incompatibilities to look out for in installing glibc? In
particuliar is there a kernel/glibc kernel match. Is the latest glibc
backward compatible? I guess there could be a gcc problem starting at
some rev.

Doug

On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Anthony Rodgers wrote:

 IIRC, menuselect requires ncurses-devel (or your distro's equivalent).

 CP

 On Dec 1, 2006, at 7:05 AM, Doug Crompton wrote:

  No, no menuslect on system beside *
 
  I unzipped it, ran configure, then make (or make menuselect) they both
  give the same immediate error 3.
 
  From what I see with 1.4.x? it might be good to have a completely
  seperste
  list. I suspect there will be tons of email volume once it's use or
  attempt of use ramps up!
 
  Doug
 
  On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Tim Panton wrote:
 
  
   On 1 Dec 2006, at 03:49, Doug Crompton wrote:
  
no - make menuselect -? does the same thing.
  
   Have you got a (non asterisk) binary or shell script called
   menuselect in your path?
  
   try
  
   which menuselect
  
   Tim Panton
  
   www.mexuar.net
   www.westhawk.co.uk/
  
  
  
   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
   asterisk-users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  ??? http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
 
 
  Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
  safety
  ?deserve neither liberty nor safety.? -- Ben Franklin (1759)
 
  
  *? Doug Crompton??? ?? *
  *? Richboro, PA 18954?? ?? *
  *? 215-431-6307 ??? ?? *
  *?? ??? ? ? ?? *
  * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
  * http://www.crompton.com? *
  
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  ?? http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] 2nd attempt - Return code - How to?

2006-11-30 Thread Doug Crompton
Can anyone give me some insight on this? If I am not making myself clear
please let me know.


At voip-info.org they show the following example

exten = s,1,Set(foo=${STAT(s,/var/t3)})

which I guess is suppose to work and make foo = size of t3

I did the following

exten = 542,1,Set(s1=${STAT(e,/var/lib/asterisk/t1)})

which should set s1 = 1  if the file exists and 0 if not.

but I get 

Nov 30 00:19:06 ERROR[23493]: pbx.c:1382 ast_func_read: Function STAT not
registered
-- Executing Set(SIP/grandstream406-22e9, s1=0) in new stack

and in general I am confused about return codes. How would you use a
return code from the following

exten = s,1,System(somescript arg1 arg2)

Can someone give me a working example??? I keep getting the above error

Doug


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] 1.4beta3 help

2006-11-30 Thread Doug Crompton
I do a  ./configure  successfully but when I try doing a 'make' I get
error 1 - menuselect

What am I doing wrong?


Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 1.4beta3 help

2006-11-30 Thread Doug Crompton
no - make menuselect -  does the same thing.

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Matt Gibson wrote:

 Maybe you must run make menuselect before running make?

 Matt G


 On 30/11/06, Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I do a  ./configure  successfully but when I try doing a 'make' I get
  error 1 - menuselect
 
  What am I doing wrong?
 
 
  Doug
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Return code - How to?

2006-11-29 Thread Doug Crompton
At voip-info.org they show the following example

exten = s,1,Set(foo=${STAT(s,/var/t3)})

which I guess is suppose to work and make foo = size of t3

I did the following

exten = 542,1,Set(s1=${STAT(e,/var/lib/asterisk/t1)})

which should set s1 = 1  if the file exists and 0 if not.

but I get 

Nov 30 00:19:06 ERROR[23493]: pbx.c:1382 ast_func_read: Function STAT not
registered
-- Executing Set(SIP/grandstream406-22e9, s1=0) in new stack

and in general I am confused about return codes. How would you use a
return code from the following

exten = s,1,System(somescript arg1 arg2)

Can someone give me a working example??? I keep getting the above error

Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Return codes

2006-11-28 Thread Doug Crompton
How does one process a return code in Asterisk?

Example...

exten = s,n,Playback(/tmp/podcast/${CALLERIDNUM})
exten = s,n,System(rm /tmp/podcast/${CALLERIDNUM}.gsm)


If the caller hangs up on the playback command the file remove System
statement after it never gets executed. The playback command returns a -1
in this case and logs a warning. The only thing mentioned in the command
reference is 101 for file not found.

Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] calls hang up even after Background() message eventhough response timeout is set to 10 sec

2006-11-26 Thread Doug Crompton
I had the same problem and found I needed a (for you example)

exten = s,n,waitexten

after the last background. This is shown in many examples and in others it
is not. Very confusing but I think adding this will work for you.

Doug

On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Jeronimo Romero wrote:

 I'm experiencing a strange problem. My inbound calls are hanging up
 right after Background() message even though response timeout is set to
 10 sec.

 [voicepulseincoming]

 exten=_X.,1,Answer
 exte=_X.,n,GotoIfTime(9:00-17:00|mon-thu|*|*?business-hours,s,1)
 exten=_X.,n,GotoIfTime(9:00-15:00|fri|*|*?business-hours,s,1)
 exten=_X.,n,GotoIfTime(*|*|*|*?after-business-hours,s,1)

 [after-business-hours]

 exten=s,1,Answer
 exten=s,n,Set(TIMEOUT(digit)=10)
 exten=s,n,Set(TIMEOUT(response)=10)
 exten=s,n,SetVar(CALLFILENAME=${TIMESTAMP}:${CALLERIDNUM})
 exten=s,n,Monitor(gsm,/var/spool/asterisk/monitor/${CALLFILENAME},m)
 exten=s,n,Background(outside-business-hours)
 exten=s,n,Background(main-auto-attendant)
 exten=i,1,Goto(after-business-hours,s,7)
 exten= 411,1,Directory(default)
 exten= a,1,Goto(after-business-hours,s,7)
 exten= o,1,Goto(after-business-hours,s,7)


 The call hangs up without respecting the 10 second response timeout.
 I've seen people posting this issue but I haven't seen the solution.
 Any help would be greatly appreciated.

 The asterisk console spits out the following message:


 -- Playing 'outside-business-hours' (language 'en')
 -- Executing BackGround(IAX2/voicepulse01-1,
 main-auto-attendant) in new stack
 -- Playing 'main-auto-attendant' (language 'en')
   == Auto fallthrough, channel 'IAX2/voicepulse01-1' status is 'UNKNOWN'
 -- Hungup 'IAX2/voicepulse01-1'




 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] How to use Sipura SPA3k POTS line to dial Asterisk SIP phones?

2006-11-18 Thread Doug Crompton
This is my spa3k fxs port sip.conf params. This uses the default context
in my extensions.conf

What are you having trouble doing? Can you make calls out to PSTN? Is it
just incoming call that are not ringing?

Doug


[sipurafxs1]
type=friend
regexten=405
username=sipurafxs1
secret=
context=default
context=from-pstn
callerid=Doug Crompton 405
host=dynamic
nat=no
port=5061
canreinvite=no
disallow=all
allow=alaw
allow=ulaw^M
allow=gsm
allow=g723.1^M
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dtmfmode=rfc2833







On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Larry Alkoff wrote:

 Doug Crompton wrote:

 Doug, please forgive me but I'm still having trouble understanding two
 points from your last response.

 Can you please post your extension 405 (analog extension on spa3k) in
 sip.conf
 and your [sipurafxs1] ?

 I finally understand that INRINGSDEV is meant to specify which analog
 and SIP phones to ring at extension INRINGSEXT = 405 and would like to
 see just how you do it.


 Larry


  On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Larry Alkoff wrote:
 
  Thank you very much Doug for your detailed response to my question.
  I'm working on a new sip.conf and extensions.conf using your code as a
  guide.
 
 
  Questions:
  In INRINGSDEV what does sipurafxs1 and grandstream406 refer to?
  The comment says ring analog phones on spa3k fxs but grandstream406
  seems to refer a Grandstream sip phone, not an analog one.
 
  Does INRINGSDEV mean ring a specific sip phone and the analog ones?
 
  INRINGSDEV is a list of the devices you want to ring when you use this
  variable in the dial statement. sipurafxs1 is the fxs side of the spa3k
  and I have one grandstream 200, at extension 406, named grandstream406.
  The analog extension, fxs on the spa3k, is 405.
 
  How would I ring all the _sip_ phones when a pstn call comes in?
  My macro 'ring-all' ?
 
 
  You just add them all together in the ring statement with the  as in my
  INRINGSDEV variable. Actually the use of the variable was taken from
  sample code given to me when I started out. It is probably a good idea
  though. you could just put them all in the dial statement but if you use
  it in more than one place it is handy to just change it in one place and
  use the variable.
 
  SIP/sipurafxs1SIP/grandstream406thirdfourth.
 
 
  Notes:
  Your sipurafxo1 is my spa3k-pstn-in defined in both Sipura and sip.conf.
  My extension to ring incoming calls is 120 vs your 405.  All ok on these
  two.
 
  I'm nearly there thanks to you.
 
 
  OK glad it helped. If you have any other questions let me know. The spa3k
  has a million settings.
 
  Larry
 
 
 
  Doug Crompton wrote:
  Below is my config for spa3k fxo. I do not show the settings in the spa3k
  which must reflect settings here, port, username, secret, etc.  I have
  DTMF set to inband here and in spa3k to fix a problem with DTMF not
  working for menus from PSTN. This was discussed earlier and is a problem
  in asterisk that may (or may not) be solved in 1.4. I am using earlier
  version. Inband must also be specifed in spa3k pstn.
 
  [sipurafxo1]
  type=peer
  username=sipurafxo1
  secret=x
  canreinvite=no
  context=from-pstn
  host=dynamic
  nat=no
  port=5061
  disallow=all
  allow=alaw
  allow=ulaw
  allow=gsm
  allow=g723.1
  dtmfmode=inband
 
 
  In extensions.conf. This is a little fancy but the bottom line is that it
  ends up in either a day or night mode. Only day shown. The spa3k fxo in
  sip calls the from-pstn but the pstn-day-time (below) could be relabeled
  from-pstn to always go to phones. The night mode basically goes to VM.
 
  INRINGSEXT and INRINGSDEV are just variables defined to -
 
  INRINGSDEV=SIP/sipurafxs1SIP/grandstream406 ; ring analog phones on spa3k
  fxs
 
  INRINGSEXT=405 ; the extension to ring for incomming calls
 
  The stdexten macro is just the standard one in sample extension file.
 
 
  [from-pstn]
  exten = s,1,GotoIf($[ ${day-night} = 0 ]?2:10
  exten = s,2,GotoIfTime(9:30-23:59,*,*,*?pstn-day-time,s,1
  exten = s,3,GotoIfTime(0:00-09:29,*,*,*?night-time,s,1
 
  exten = s,10,GotoIf($[ ${day-night} = 1 ]?pstn-day-time,s,1
  exten = s,11,GotoIf($[ ${day-night} = 2 ]?night-time,s,1
 
 
  [pstn-day-time]
  exten = s,1,SetGlobalVar(RingTimeout=35)
  exten = s,2,NoOp(${CALLERID})
  exten = s,3,Macro(stdexten,${INRINGSEXT},${INRINGSDEV},)
 
 
  On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Larry Alkoff wrote:
 
  My SIP phones can dial out through Sipura SPA3k to POTS for local and
  911 calls _but_ incoming POTS calls are being swallowup somehow.
 
  Am I on the right track with the code snippit below?
 
  sip.conf:
  -
  In sip.conf the following code is _supposed_ to ring the SIP phones when
  a POTS line call comes in through Sipuara to Asterisk.
 
  [spa3k-pstn-in] ; Pots-line-in from Sipura
  ; If you're using Asterisk, this goes into the Incoming settings
  ; For your Trunk
  host=dynamic
 
  type=friend  ; should be peer if incoming only ??
 
  context=[macro-ringall]  ;ring all the sip phones
 
  secret=x

Re: [asterisk-users] How to use Sipura SPA3k POTS line to dial Asterisk SIP phones?

2006-11-15 Thread Doug Crompton
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Larry Alkoff wrote:

 Thank you very much Doug for your detailed response to my question.
 I'm working on a new sip.conf and extensions.conf using your code as a
 guide.


 Questions:
 In INRINGSDEV what does sipurafxs1 and grandstream406 refer to?
 The comment says ring analog phones on spa3k fxs but grandstream406
 seems to refer a Grandstream sip phone, not an analog one.

 Does INRINGSDEV mean ring a specific sip phone and the analog ones?

INRINGSDEV is a list of the devices you want to ring when you use this
variable in the dial statement. sipurafxs1 is the fxs side of the spa3k
and I have one grandstream 200, at extension 406, named grandstream406.
The analog extension, fxs on the spa3k, is 405.


 How would I ring all the _sip_ phones when a pstn call comes in?
 My macro 'ring-all' ?


You just add them all together in the ring statement with the  as in my
INRINGSDEV variable. Actually the use of the variable was taken from
sample code given to me when I started out. It is probably a good idea
though. you could just put them all in the dial statement but if you use
it in more than one place it is handy to just change it in one place and
use the variable.

SIP/sipurafxs1SIP/grandstream406thirdfourth.


 Notes:
 Your sipurafxo1 is my spa3k-pstn-in defined in both Sipura and sip.conf.
 My extension to ring incoming calls is 120 vs your 405.  All ok on these
 two.

 I'm nearly there thanks to you.


OK glad it helped. If you have any other questions let me know. The spa3k
has a million settings.

 Larry



 Doug Crompton wrote:
  Below is my config for spa3k fxo. I do not show the settings in the spa3k
  which must reflect settings here, port, username, secret, etc.  I have
  DTMF set to inband here and in spa3k to fix a problem with DTMF not
  working for menus from PSTN. This was discussed earlier and is a problem
  in asterisk that may (or may not) be solved in 1.4. I am using earlier
  version. Inband must also be specifed in spa3k pstn.
 
  [sipurafxo1]
  type=peer
  username=sipurafxo1
  secret=x
  canreinvite=no
  context=from-pstn
  host=dynamic
  nat=no
  port=5061
  disallow=all
  allow=alaw
  allow=ulaw
  allow=gsm
  allow=g723.1
  dtmfmode=inband
 
 
  In extensions.conf. This is a little fancy but the bottom line is that it
  ends up in either a day or night mode. Only day shown. The spa3k fxo in
  sip calls the from-pstn but the pstn-day-time (below) could be relabeled
  from-pstn to always go to phones. The night mode basically goes to VM.
 
  INRINGSEXT and INRINGSDEV are just variables defined to -
 
  INRINGSDEV=SIP/sipurafxs1SIP/grandstream406 ; ring analog phones on spa3k
  fxs
 
  INRINGSEXT=405 ; the extension to ring for incomming calls
 
  The stdexten macro is just the standard one in sample extension file.
 
 
  [from-pstn]
  exten = s,1,GotoIf($[ ${day-night} = 0 ]?2:10
  exten = s,2,GotoIfTime(9:30-23:59,*,*,*?pstn-day-time,s,1
  exten = s,3,GotoIfTime(0:00-09:29,*,*,*?night-time,s,1
 
  exten = s,10,GotoIf($[ ${day-night} = 1 ]?pstn-day-time,s,1
  exten = s,11,GotoIf($[ ${day-night} = 2 ]?night-time,s,1
 
 
  [pstn-day-time]
  exten = s,1,SetGlobalVar(RingTimeout=35)
  exten = s,2,NoOp(${CALLERID})
  exten = s,3,Macro(stdexten,${INRINGSEXT},${INRINGSDEV},)
 
 
  On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Larry Alkoff wrote:
 
  My SIP phones can dial out through Sipura SPA3k to POTS for local and
  911 calls _but_ incoming POTS calls are being swallowup somehow.
 
  Am I on the right track with the code snippit below?
 
  sip.conf:
  -
  In sip.conf the following code is _supposed_ to ring the SIP phones when
  a POTS line call comes in through Sipuara to Asterisk.
 
  [spa3k-pstn-in] ; Pots-line-in from Sipura
  ; If you're using Asterisk, this goes into the Incoming settings
  ; For your Trunk
  host=dynamic
 
  type=friend; should be peer if incoming only ??
 
  context=[macro-ringall];ring all the sip phones
 
  secret=x
  dtmfmode=rfc2833
  disallow=all
  allow=ulaw
  insecure=very
 
 
  extensions.conf
  
  context to ring all SIP phones when a POTS call comes into SPA3k:
 
  [macro-ringall] ; ring all SIP phones
  exten = s,1,Dial(SIP/120SIP/121SIP/122SIP/124SIP/125SIP/126SIP/127)
  exten = s,2,hangup
 
  --
  Larry Alkoff N2LA - Austin TX
  Using Thunderbird on Linux
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
  Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
   deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)
 
  
  *  Doug Crompton   *
  *  Richboro, PA 18954  *
  *  215-431-6307*
  *  *
  * [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
  * http://www.crompton.com

Re: [asterisk-users] Grandstream GXP2000 -- What's the Catch?

2006-11-15 Thread Doug Crompton
Well I have a Grandstream 200 in a home application and so far I have been
happy with it. My biggest complaint is that 99% of these IP phones are
black!!

One of the reasons I bought the 200 was because it has a bright red, see
across the room, message waiting indicator. I have not seen that spec'ed
on other phones. That doe not meant they don't have it, it is just not
spec'd. I imagine the multiline LCD's have it on the screen, but you would
not see that unless you specifically walked over and looked.

I would be interested if any other phones have message waiting indicators
as visible as the GS 200.

Doug

On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Tom Vile wrote:

 They brake easy.
 Speaker phone is not very good.
 Overall sound not good compared to a Snom, Polycom or Cisco phone.
 Drop registrations with Asterisk randomly.
 Power supplies die.  Had 4 out of 10 go bad within a year.
 LCD backlight died on 2 that I deployed.

 We only do the Snom 320 or 360's now and are just as easy to configure and
 have alot of great options as well.

 On 11/15/06, Jeronimo Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
  We are doing a medium sized office in NYC with 80 phones. The customer
  originally requested Polycom 601 phones. The COO also authorized us to
  purchase 2 Grandstream GXP2000 phones for the mail room. We find these
  phones much easier to configure and work with asterisk . They support BLF 
  intercom right out of the box. They can also be centrally managed and
  provisioned. They also sound great and work in a very intuitive way. We
  don't have real life experience deploying this phone so I'm just going to
  ask:
 
 
 
  Is there a catch?  Why the huge price difference? These phones seem to do
  everything a busy corporate office would need. Is there a big qualitative
  difference between this phone and Polycom501/601?? Is there a major problem
  with this phone not disclosed by the manufacturer or vendors. Some feedback
  from people who have deployed them would be great.
 
 
 
  Thanks In advance.
 
 
 
  JR
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 


 --
 Tom Vile



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Grandstream GXP2000 -- What's the Catch?

2006-11-15 Thread Doug Crompton
Is that not what the early dial option is for? In the GS 200 it dials
immediately based on * dialpans with this option set. I am sure the 2000
has it also. I have no wait for any valid dialplan.

Doug



On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Henry.L.Coleman wrote:

 I have deployed the Grandstream 2000 with very little hardware problems.
 Early firmware was petty rough but from 1.1.1.9 onwards is very robust.
 Frankly it represents the best bang for your buck. The only thing that I
 would like to see is a dial plan (which would speed up dialing). Most
 IP-phones don't have this anyway so it's not a big deal. The only other
 IP-Phone that I would consider is the Aastra 480i which is of a higher
 overall quality but the display is not as bright as the GXP 2000 and is
 difficult to view.

 PS they haven't ironed out all the bugs with the sidecar (56 button BLF/DSS)

 Henry L.Coleman CEO
 *VoIP-PBX* 1-866-415-5355
 Toronto Ontario
 Canada


  Doug,
 
  Just a note on this subject: I have a Snom 320 at home, and it's got a
  nice
  orange MWI that's pretty visible (especially if the apartment is dark). At
  the office I have a Polycom 501. It's got a great red light right at the
  top
  of the phone in the middle. It's very visible unless the phone isn't
  facing
  you at all.
 
  Alex
 
  On 11/15/06, Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Well I have a Grandstream 200 in a home application and so far I have
  been
  happy with it. My biggest complaint is that 99% of these IP phones are
  black!!
 
  One of the reasons I bought the 200 was because it has a bright red, see
  across the room, message waiting indicator. I have not seen that spec'ed
  on other phones. That doe not meant they don't have it, it is just not
  spec'd. I imagine the multiline LCD's have it on the screen, but you
  would
  not see that unless you specifically walked over and looked.
 
  I would be interested if any other phones have message waiting
  indicators
  as visible as the GS 200.
 
  Doug
 
  On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Tom Vile wrote:
 
   They brake easy.
   Speaker phone is not very good.
   Overall sound not good compared to a Snom, Polycom or Cisco phone.
   Drop registrations with Asterisk randomly.
   Power supplies die.  Had 4 out of 10 go bad within a year.
   LCD backlight died on 2 that I deployed.
  
   We only do the Snom 320 or 360's now and are just as easy to configure
  and
   have alot of great options as well.
  
   On 11/15/06, Jeronimo Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
   
   
We are doing a medium sized office in NYC with 80 phones. The
  customer
originally requested Polycom 601 phones. The COO also authorized us
  to
purchase 2 Grandstream GXP2000 phones for the mail room. We find
  these
phones much easier to configure and work with asterisk . They
  support
  BLF 
intercom right out of the box. They can also be centrally managed
  and
provisioned. They also sound great and work in a very intuitive way.
  We
don't have real life experience deploying this phone so I'm just
  going
  to
ask:
   
   
   
Is there a catch?  Why the huge price difference? These phones seem
  to
  do
everything a busy corporate office would need. Is there a big
  qualitative
difference between this phone and Polycom501/601?? Is there a major
  problem
with this phone not disclosed by the manufacturer or vendors. Some
  feedback
from people who have deployed them would be great.
   
   
   
Thanks In advance.
   
   
   
JR
   
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
   
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   
   
   
  
  
   --
   Tom Vile
  
 
 
  Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
  safety
  deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)
 
  
  *  Doug Crompton   *
  *  Richboro, PA 18954  *
  *  215-431-6307*
  *  *
  * [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
  * http://www.crompton.com  *
  
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
 
  --
  Alex Robar
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice

[asterisk-users] 900 rules

2006-11-14 Thread Doug Crompton
I had a 19xx rule in asterisk and realized when I was trying to dial an
area code 978 in MA that that was not a good idea. Is there a more defined
rule for 900 space of non pay vs. pay codes?

Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] 900 rules

2006-11-14 Thread Doug Crompton
Ok so ONLY 900 numbers are pay.

Next question 18XX  numbers.  are they all toll free? Is there any
space in 8xx that is used otherwise?

Doug


On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:

 Doug Crompton wrote:
  I had a 19xx rule in asterisk and realized when I was trying to dial an
  area code 978 in MA that that was not a good idea. Is there a more defined
  rule for 900 space of non pay vs. pay codes?



 _1900NXX
 _NXX976
 ___


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] How to use Sipura SPA3k POTS line to dial Asterisk SIP phones?

2006-11-14 Thread Doug Crompton
Below is my config for spa3k fxo. I do not show the settings in the spa3k
which must reflect settings here, port, username, secret, etc.  I have
DTMF set to inband here and in spa3k to fix a problem with DTMF not
working for menus from PSTN. This was discussed earlier and is a problem
in asterisk that may (or may not) be solved in 1.4. I am using earlier
version. Inband must also be specifed in spa3k pstn.

[sipurafxo1]
type=peer
username=sipurafxo1
secret=x
canreinvite=no
context=from-pstn
host=dynamic
nat=no
port=5061
disallow=all
allow=alaw
allow=ulaw
allow=gsm
allow=g723.1
dtmfmode=inband


In extensions.conf. This is a little fancy but the bottom line is that it
ends up in either a day or night mode. Only day shown. The spa3k fxo in
sip calls the from-pstn but the pstn-day-time (below) could be relabeled
from-pstn to always go to phones. The night mode basically goes to VM.

INRINGSEXT and INRINGSDEV are just variables defined to -

INRINGSDEV=SIP/sipurafxs1SIP/grandstream406 ; ring analog phones on spa3k
fxs

INRINGSEXT=405 ; the extension to ring for incomming calls

The stdexten macro is just the standard one in sample extension file.


[from-pstn]
exten = s,1,GotoIf($[ ${day-night} = 0 ]?2:10
exten = s,2,GotoIfTime(9:30-23:59,*,*,*?pstn-day-time,s,1
exten = s,3,GotoIfTime(0:00-09:29,*,*,*?night-time,s,1

exten = s,10,GotoIf($[ ${day-night} = 1 ]?pstn-day-time,s,1
exten = s,11,GotoIf($[ ${day-night} = 2 ]?night-time,s,1


[pstn-day-time]
exten = s,1,SetGlobalVar(RingTimeout=35)
exten = s,2,NoOp(${CALLERID})
exten = s,3,Macro(stdexten,${INRINGSEXT},${INRINGSDEV},)


On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Larry Alkoff wrote:

 My SIP phones can dial out through Sipura SPA3k to POTS for local and
 911 calls _but_ incoming POTS calls are being swallowup somehow.

 Am I on the right track with the code snippit below?

 sip.conf:
 -
 In sip.conf the following code is _supposed_ to ring the SIP phones when
 a POTS line call comes in through Sipuara to Asterisk.

 [spa3k-pstn-in] ; Pots-line-in from Sipura
 ; If you're using Asterisk, this goes into the Incoming settings
 ; For your Trunk
 host=dynamic

 type=friend   ; should be peer if incoming only ??

 context=[macro-ringall]   ;ring all the sip phones

 secret=x
 dtmfmode=rfc2833
 disallow=all
 allow=ulaw
 insecure=very


 extensions.conf
 
 context to ring all SIP phones when a POTS call comes into SPA3k:

 [macro-ringall] ; ring all SIP phones
 exten = s,1,Dial(SIP/120SIP/121SIP/122SIP/124SIP/125SIP/126SIP/127)
 exten = s,2,hangup

 --
 Larry Alkoff N2LA - Austin TX
 Using Thunderbird on Linux
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Ringing phones

2006-11-08 Thread Doug Crompton
You did not mention what your FXO (connection to PSTN) hardware is???
Depending on what it is there may be configuration options for things like
'ring thru' and wether the fxo answers or passes the call to *

Doug

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Matt wrote:

 Hi,
 I have a system that connects to the PSTN.What do I need to do so
 that when a call comes in, the system will start ringing the hunt
 group I have setup but not actually answer the call?  The problem is
 the system is answering the call, and then passing 'ringing tones'
 back to the caller, so this makes the phone companies
 call-forward-no-answer not work since the telco thinks they have
 answered!
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Reg errors? Other anomalies? Check those capacitors!

2006-11-08 Thread Doug Crompton
The motherboard's capacitor? What is that? Since there are probably a
hundred or more caps on the MB, how did you determine that? Was it burned?
Other than that, without making either capacitance or noise tests I can't
imagine how you would make that assumption.

Doug

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Ronald Lewis wrote:

 Three months ago, I was experiencing all sorts of issues with my Asterisk
 box maintaining a connection to multiple trunks, etc. I also experienced
 various timing issues as well. In addition, Asterisk would sometimes take
 almost a minute to fully load and register its SIP and IAX trunks.

 Puzzled, I recompiled several times. No result. I checked my hardware.
 Didn't find anything. However, I did overlook one thing:

 * The motherboard's capacitor!

 Yep, you guessed it! It was bad. Now, I do not have any problems (I didn't
 bother replacing the motherboard, ended up using a spare PC).



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Dial plan Question

2006-11-07 Thread Doug Crompton
Thanks, that set off a light bulb In my spa3K my incoming dialplan was
set to  (S0:405)

Since this is a one FXO unit and my [from-pstn] will always be that line
can I make it generic and use the 's' extension as I described? If so what
would that spa3k dialplan be? just s0 ?

Doug

On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:

 Am Dienstag, den 07.11.2006, 02:29 -0500 schrieb Doug Crompton:
  I am trying to do something that I see describe in a book and it is not
  working
 
  In my sip.conf, I have in my [fxo] context=from-pstn
 
  I then have in extensions.conf
 
  [from-pstn]
 
  exten s,1,answer()
  exten s,2,playback(blah)
 
  etc.
 
  It never answers but if I do this
 
  [from-pstn]
 
  exten _x.,1,answer()
  exten _x.,2,playback(blah)
 
  it works.  Why does the 's' extension not work here?

 If fxo means your SIP provider, and you register with him, a specific
 extension will be called. Which one shall be called can be selected by
 the last parameter of the register statement, e.g.

 register = 075741:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060/492281234567

 will cause the incoming calls to appear in extension 492281234567.

 Comes in handy if you have several accounts with a single SIP provider:
 This way, you can simply distinguish the outward phone number for which
 the call came in.

 BR
 Anselm

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Dial plan Question

2006-11-07 Thread Doug Crompton
Answering my own question. If you want to connect an spa3K with
generic pstn inbound do the following...

for the pstn to voip dialplan in the pstn tab -  (S0:ip-address-of-*)

in sip.conf

[sipurafxo]
context=from-pstn
etc.

Then in * extensions.conf use the s extension.

[from-pstn]
exten = s,1,answer()
exten = s,2,dial.
etc.

Makes it alot easier as you do not have to deal with extension matching
when you know where it is coming from.

Doug


On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Doug Crompton wrote:

 Thanks, that set off a light bulb In my spa3K my incoming dialplan was
 set to  (S0:405)

 Since this is a one FXO unit and my [from-pstn] will always be that line
 can I make it generic and use the 's' extension as I described? If so what
 would that spa3k dialplan be? just s0 ?

 Doug

 On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:

  Am Dienstag, den 07.11.2006, 02:29 -0500 schrieb Doug Crompton:
   I am trying to do something that I see describe in a book and it is not
   working
  
   In my sip.conf, I have in my [fxo] context=from-pstn
  
   I then have in extensions.conf
  
   [from-pstn]
  
   exten s,1,answer()
   exten s,2,playback(blah)
  
   etc.
  
   It never answers but if I do this
  
   [from-pstn]
  
   exten _x.,1,answer()
   exten _x.,2,playback(blah)
  
   it works.  Why does the 's' extension not work here?
 
  If fxo means your SIP provider, and you register with him, a specific
  extension will be called. Which one shall be called can be selected by
  the last parameter of the register statement, e.g.
 
  register = 075741:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060/492281234567
 
  will cause the incoming calls to appear in extension 492281234567.
 
  Comes in handy if you have several accounts with a single SIP provider:
  This way, you can simply distinguish the outward phone number for which
  the call came in.
 
  BR
  Anselm
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 


 Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
  deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)

 
 *  Doug Crompton *
 *  Richboro, PA 18954*
 *  215-431-6307  *
 **
 * [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
 * http://www.crompton.com  *
 


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Dial plan Question

2006-11-06 Thread Doug Crompton
I am trying to do something that I see describe in a book and it is not
working

In my sip.conf, I have in my [fxo] context=from-pstn

I then have in extensions.conf

[from-pstn]

exten s,1,answer()
exten s,2,playback(blah)

etc.

It never answers but if I do this

[from-pstn]

exten _x.,1,answer()
exten _x.,2,playback(blah)

it works.  Why does the 's' extension not work here?

Doug

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Newbie Questions - Grandstorm phones?

2006-11-05 Thread Doug Crompton
On the Budgetone 200 it is in the account tab settings of the web setup
and it does work here with asterisk and my dialplans..

Doug

On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, [iso-8859-1] Jes?s M?ndez Rom?n wrote:

 Hi,

 Where can I find that option?

 Thanks
 Jesus

 -Mensaje original-
 De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Gordon
 Henderson
 Enviado el: Jueves, 02 de Noviembre de 2006 11:44 a.m.
 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
 Non-Commercial Discussion
 Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Newbie Questions - Grandstorm phones?

 On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Henry.L.Coleman wrote:

  I came to the same conclusion.
  There is one thing however that the GXP2000 needs in my opinion.
  There is no dial plan avaiable in the configuration, this means that when
  dialing a number there is a slight delay before it actually dials.
  With a dial plan the dialed number is sent immeadiately the pattern is
  match ed so it saves a second or two. Maybe they will fix this?

 Set the Early Dial option - it's on a per-line basis, then as soon
 as Asterisk gets a number it can dial, it will. No need to wait the 4
 seconds or press the send button...

 Gordon

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] SPA3k wired to PAP2 for echo testing

2006-11-05 Thread Doug Crompton
Yes I agree, the SPA3000 can be a bear with echo on the PSTN. I did find
that using older fimware helped some and that the levels - there are 4
settings - FXO/FXS in/out can be juggled to help. I also found out after
adding a Budgetone 200 that I had much less echo problem going through it
and the spa3000 FXO - vs. using the local analog phones on the spa3000 fxs
port to FXO port. So some of the answer might be to get rid of as much (or
all) local analog as you can. I plan to buy more hard sip phones and do
that here eventually. This is ultimately more flexible as each extension
has it's own number and they can dial each other as well as dial more then
one place simutaneously. The big problem is that SIP phones are generally
ugly and black and not styled for home use.

Doug

On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, James Harper wrote:

 In my seemingly endless search for the cause of echo on my SPA3000, I
 wired it up in the following configuration:

 Analogue Handset -- (FXS)SPA3000(FXO) -- PAP2

 And set the Line1 dialplan on the SPA3k to '(:@gw0S0)' which means
 that as soon as I pick up the handset I get linked straight through to
 the PAP2, which gives me dialtone.

 Even in this configuration, with my impedance settings set to the
 Australian standard of 220+820||120nf, and the PSTN and PAP2 echo
 cancellers enabled (or not, and all combinations of) I get local echo as
 soon as I pick up the handset (I hear my voice bounced back to me).
 Surely this shouldn't be??? There is no hybrid involved at all!

 If anyone on this list with a SPA3k (that doesn't have any local echo
 problems on the PSTN port) and an ATA with a FXS port, could they please
 try the above setup and post the results (including SPA3k hardware and
 firmware versions, and the ATA used)? I wonder if there is a problem
 with some versions of the SPA3k where there is some sort of inbalance on
 the PSTN port that causes echo right there rather than further down the
 line?

 Thanks

 James

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] IVR problem

2006-11-03 Thread Doug Crompton
Can anyone tell me why the following code snipet does not behave the way I
would expect?

The background audio files are gsm and play fine. Here is what happens.
When the set-day-night context is called it plays the menu asking to
select 0,1, or 2. It then immediately falls through and terminates never
waiting for the selection. Doesn't the timeout function determine the
length of time it waits regardless of the actual sound file length? I have
tried lengthening the time to no avail. The line marked below waitexten
was added to make it work. It does not have the same functionality though
with this added. The code minus this line is textbook basic IVR
as far as I can tell. Comments???

Doug

[set-day-night]
exten = s,1,Answer
exten = s,2,SetMusicOnHold(default)
exten = s,3,Set(TIMEOUT(digit)=5)
exten = s,4,Set(TIMEOUT(response)=10)
exten = s,5,Background(doug/select-day-night)
exten = s,6,waitexten   added line
exten = s,7,hangup()

exten = 0,1,SetGlobalVar(day-night=0)
exten = 0,2,Playback(doug/day-night-mode-reset)
exten = 0,3,Hangup()

exten = 1,1,SetGlobalVar(day-night=1)
exten = 1,2,Playback(doug/day-mode)
exten = 1,3,Hangup()

exten = 2,1,SetGlobalVar(day-night=2)
exten = 2,2,Playback(doug/night-mode)
exten = 2,3,Hangup()

exten = t,1,Goto(#,1) ; If they take too long, give up
exten = i,1,Playback(invalid) ; That's not valid, try again
exten = i,2,Hangup()


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] IVR problem

2006-11-03 Thread Doug Crompton
Ok thanks... well my point was that numerous examples show NOT using
waitexten but rather just background with the appropriate timers set. So
in my example below s,6 and s,7 would be eliminated. This seems to not
work though. As soon as the backgrouond message is complete the plan exits
to nowhere rather than obey the timeout (t) plan. At least this is the way
the book says it should be.

Doug

On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Bruce Reeves wrote:

 I have a similar IVR and use WaitExten(5) to give 5 seconds for the
 extension to be entered. I have not tried using the Timeout options so I am
 not sure how they should affect your dialplan.

 On 11/3/06, Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Can anyone tell me why the following code snipet does not behave the way I
  would expect?
 
  The background audio files are gsm and play fine. Here is what happens.
  When the set-day-night context is called it plays the menu asking to
  select 0,1, or 2. It then immediately falls through and terminates never
  waiting for the selection. Doesn't the timeout function determine the
  length of time it waits regardless of the actual sound file length? I have
  tried lengthening the time to no avail. The line marked below waitexten
  was added to make it work. It does not have the same functionality though
  with this added. The code minus this line is textbook basic IVR
  as far as I can tell. Comments???
 
  Doug
 
  [set-day-night]
  exten = s,1,Answer
  exten = s,2,SetMusicOnHold(default)
  exten = s,3,Set(TIMEOUT(digit)=5)
  exten = s,4,Set(TIMEOUT(response)=10)
  exten = s,5,Background(doug/select-day-night)
  exten = s,6,waitexten   added line
  exten = s,7,hangup()
 
  exten = 0,1,SetGlobalVar(day-night=0)
  exten = 0,2,Playback(doug/day-night-mode-reset)
  exten = 0,3,Hangup()
 
  exten = 1,1,SetGlobalVar(day-night=1)
  exten = 1,2,Playback(doug/day-mode)
  exten = 1,3,Hangup()
 
  exten = 2,1,SetGlobalVar(day-night=2)
  exten = 2,2,Playback(doug/night-mode)
  exten = 2,3,Hangup()
 
  exten = t,1,Goto(#,1) ; If they take too long, give up
  exten = i,1,Playback(invalid) ; That's not valid, try again
  exten = i,2,Hangup()
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 



 --
 Bruce
 Nortex Networks



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Re: My Phone Review- Large Scale Corp Deployment.

2006-11-03 Thread Doug Crompton
I am certainly not an expert on this but I bought a Budgetone 200 and for
$59 in the VOIP market I think it is an excellent bargain. While not
feature laden it does what it is suppose to. My biggest complaint is that
most all of the VOIP phones are made for the business and not the home
market. 99% of them are black and ugly and not something I would like in
my kitchen or bedroom. I choose the Budgetone 200 for it's style as well
as the mostly high ratings I have seen for it. It would be nice if it was
offered in white or beige though. I also like the message waiting
indicator that works well with * VM.  It is easy to setup and easy to use.
If you are thinking about using it in a larger scale you should buy one
and evaluate it. No big loss if you don't like it and you should even be
able to return it with most suppliers if you are not satisfied.

It sounds as good or better than my analog system through an spa-3000 and
appears to have less echo problems.

Doug

On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Doug Meredith wrote:

 Eddie Johnson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Did you test Snom or Sipura hard ip phones? I was considering Budgetone
 for an office of 10 users. After reading your testimonial I will have
 to re-think my selection.

 I don't know if you have used a BT but this isn't a phone that I would
 put in my garage much less my office. Poor sound quality, lousy display
 and a horrible interface. If you want something cheap to prove that VoIP
 actually works, then sure. If you plan to use it to talk to someone,
 then look elsewhere.

 Some other quick notes:

 Aastra 480i works pretty well.

 Sipura SPA-841 isn't much of a phone.

 Linksys SPA-921  941 work pretty well but suffer from occasional
 lockups and spontaneous reboots (latest firmware).

 Linksys WIP-300 is crap.

 Doug
 --
 Doug Meredith
 506-854-7997 ext. 801

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Sipura ATA's Forwarding PSTN Calls to Asterisk

2006-07-24 Thread Doug Crompton

I am using an Sipura 3000 here and it is working (mostly) fine but I had a
lot of learning to do in the beginning. I missed the original question and
problem?? Perhaps you could state that again of refer me to it? Keep in
mind there are two major firmware versions for the 3000. Version 2 and 3.
In version 2 you have to do some extra stuff to get it to allow Asterisk
to answer. In version 3 there is an option to allow it to pass the ringing
call to Asterisk which makes it a lot easier. when doing this you need to
set the delay such that at least 1-2 rings are received before you do this
or the CID does not get passed properly. I have it set to 4 or 4 seconds
as I recall.

The version 3 firmware IS useaable on the version 2 hardware. I am using
it here. I did find that an earlier version 3 firmware had better echo
cancelation then the lastest version though. Actually the version 2
firmware was even better but lacking the option to have Asterisk answer
the phone, so I opted for the compromise.

I would be glad to send my settings it you like. My HW version is 2.0.1
and firmware is 3.1.3

The Sipura site only has the latest version 3 - 3.1.10 I believe. There is
an (australian?) site that has all the past versions available for
download. Google for it.

Doug


Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] DTMF and ivr systems

2006-07-01 Thread Doug Crompton
I am using an SPA-3000 and after using Ulaw (G711) on my * to FXO side
(not FXS) it seems to work fine. I believe there is a problem with * and
DTMF that is being worked on and there should be something new to (try) in
the 1.4 release this summer. I don't think you mentioned your hardware. I
think this works differently  depending on the device. When I used
RFC-2833 and AUTO on my SPA-3000 FXO side, I got the short muted blip of
DTMF you mentioned. Changing to INBAND now gives at least a 250ms+
duration, which has been long enough to work with anything I have
tried.

The reason that * is checking/muting DTMF is that it has to look for
transfer and other codes to process. So this is the other gotcha. You
cannot use transfer or any other features because even with inband * seems
to mute when using this - I.E. if your transfer feature is #9, when you
hit the # key it will mute and the # key will never get through. I believe
the correct behavior would be to wait and see if the second key was sent
in a certain time and if not then send the orginal key. Rather tricky but
it does not work in the current *. So I do not use any features that use
the DTMF keys.

So to summarize INBAND, Ulaw, on FXO and not use of DTMF features and
it should work. Turning off feaures means no Tt, etc in dial command. I do
transfers or parking, if needed via switch hook. Hopefully this will be
fixed and I can go back to rfc-8322 and also have my features back in the
future.

It also really helps to call yourself, say to a cellphone, and listen for
this behavior!

Doug

On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Monty Lilburn wrote:

 Hi,

 I too am experiencing the same problem you have.

 I am using inband DTMF processing with ULaw (G711) and like you I notice
 that Asterisk seams to be passively listening to the line waiting to hear
 a DTMF.  When it hears a DTMF it mutes the handset and
 regenerates my original DTMF (in a very short burst) which often gets
 missed by the remote party.  This is especially true for IVR systems.

   I haven't come across a configuration option that keeps Asterisk
 from muting the handset and regenerating the original DTMF.  Perhaps if
 Asterisk saw that the active channel was using inband processing with G711
 it could leave everything alone and just let the user's dtmf go through
 unfettered!

 If this isn't possible for some technical reason I wonder if there is a
 configuration option that allows the user to set the duration of the
 regenerated dtmf?

 Maybe a developer will see this and can comment.

 Best regards,
Monty


 On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Shane wrote:

  Hello,
 
  Ther's probably a simple answer to this but I've searched
  around and haven't located anything as yet.  Is there a way
  to have DTMF tones passed through Asterisk without it
  messing with them?  I am using a tdm21b card and when I
  call an ivr system from the telephone handset (routed over
  sip or iax2) such as telebanking, the ivr has trouble
  recognizing tones.  When I tested this with a remote party,
  I was told tones were breaking up.  For example, a long
  press would result in a click, some silence and a small
  dtmf on the remote end.  Triggering a speed dial didn't go
  well either as he heard only a few tones.  I have
  dtmfmode=inband in sip.conf and have tried relaxdtmf=yes in
  zapata.conf.
 
  I realize Asterisk does need to detect dtmf for things like
  call parking but can it just pass the audio to the other
  side with no regard for whether it's dtmf digits?  IE. long
  press results in long tone, etc.
 
  Best,
  Shane
 
 
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?

2006-06-26 Thread Doug Crompton
I guess I did not make my point clearly enough. I already do have just
that. An spa-3000 with ALL internal analog phones on it's on FXO. But this
gives just ONE extension for all phones. Yes I could get more FXS's and
run seperate wires.

So with that background what would be nice is a wireless device like the
Panasonic cordless with one base and multiple phone capability that
connected via ethernet and serves the phones. Just wishful thinking. I
will stick with what I have until something useful, sylish, and less
expensive arrives.

Doug


On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Michael George wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 12:08:48AM -0400, Doug Crompton wrote:
  Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not there for a
  bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a wireless
  sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow multiple
  extension off of one base. The base would connect to the internet. The
  other problem is many of these phones require power, so even if you have
  backup for your central system the phone still needs to be on it. Power
  over ethernet would help.

 1. If you have *, you don't necessarily need multiple handsets off of one
   base.
 2. Cordless phones also require power
 3. If the multi-handset cordless phone does suit your needs best, then
   get a SIP ATA device like a Sipura or IAXy and you should have your
   needs met.

 --
 -M

 There are 10 kinds of people in this world:
   Those who can count in binary and those who cannot.
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?

2006-06-26 Thread Doug Crompton
Iain,

 Thanks for the repsonse but you are kidding me right? From what I can see
if I bought this phone and two remotes my outlay would be close to $800
US. This is NOT a home device unless you have nothing better to do with
your money!

You can buy a lot of single line wireless phones and FXS devices for that
amount!

Doug

On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Iain Barker wrote:

 Doug,

 What you are describing sounds like the Aastra 480-CT, a base Ethernet/SIP 
 screenphone supporting multiple wireless handsets [but as this is a 
 non-commercial list I won't go into more detail here, google for the above 
 model number if you're interested in more info.]

 - Iain

 ---
 Message: 4
 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:08:48 -0400 (EDT)
 From: Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
   asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Message-ID:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

 Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not there for a
 bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a wireless
 sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow multiple
 extension off of one base. The base would connect to the internet. The
 other problem is many of these phones require power, so even if you have
 backup for your central system the phone still needs to be on it. Power
 over ethernet would help.

 Doug



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?

2006-06-25 Thread Doug Crompton
Still awfully pricey for home use and the styling is not there for a
bedroom or many other areas of a modern home. What we need is a wireless
sip phone modeled like the panasonic or uniden which allow multiple
extension off of one base. The base would connect to the internet. The
other problem is many of these phones require power, so even if you have
backup for your central system the phone still needs to be on it. Power
over ethernet would help.

Doug

On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, shadowym wrote:

 I believe all three Aastra phones(9112, 9133i, 480i)have exactly the same
 handsets and speakerphone hardware which is THE most
 important thing.  After that it just depends on what
 additional features you want.  They are ALL solid business
 phones IMHO and Aastra's support of the Asterisk community
 and the end user is outstanding!

  -Original Message-
  From: Dave Cotton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 11:19 AM
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] best hardphone for Asterisk?
 
  On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 10:39 -0700, shadowym wrote:
   I love my Aastra 9133i with v1.4 firmware.  Pretty much everything
   just works with Asterisk right out of the box and it has
  all the features I need.
 
  If cost is important the 9112i would be better. I install all
  three Aastra models and the sound quality is good across the range.
  --
  Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] DTMF Talk off

2006-06-20 Thread Doug Crompton
Ok Now I understand. You mentioned you have an SPA-3000 in your inventory.
That is what I use here and I do not load or use zap or pri modules. I use
the 3000 as my fxo/fxs via sip on my local network. I have no cards in my
computer. You could do the same for testing of your problem.

Doug

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, John Millican wrote:

 Okay here goes,
 I guess I misunderstood Doug's question about the far end interface. I have no
 availability for high speed internet at my house to place a VoIP call over.
 So, I have a standard phone plugged into the PAP2, The PAP2 plugs into the
 network at my house to which the asterisk box is also connected,  the
 asterisk box has an FXO card that has the PSTN line plugged into it, this is
 where the ZAP channel comes in.  when i dial a local number asterisk simple
 dials the number out the pstn line.  If i dial a long distance number, the *
 box dials a local phone number that I have through my VoIP provider which is
 answered by an * box that I have at a different location using a line in
 extensions.conf like:
 Dial(zap/1/my_sip_numberww${EXTEN});
 this way when the second * answers the phone it get the ${EXTEN} that I
 actually dialed and dials it out over the cable connection.  I hope i was a
 little clearer this time and sorry for the confusion.
 John M


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] DTMF Talk off

2006-06-20 Thread Doug Crompton
John,

 Well I have mentioned this before but not sure if I did to you... The
only was I was able to get things working well here was to use ulaw/alaw
only on the FXO and also use INBAND. This is specified on both the PSTN
tab of the 3000 and in the FXO sip.conf for it. I did not have to do this
for the fxs, line1 spa3000 port.

The other thing that is useful is to call yourself. If you have a
cellphone, call it and listen while hitting DTMF keys in both directions.
You should hear at least 500ms or more of the tone.

Doug

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, John Millican wrote:

 I have looked at that as a solution but haven't been able to get the dtmf to
 work reliably.  When I dial a local call i get connected okay and can
 obviously connect to the second * box with out problem, the problem comes in
 trying to get the ${EXTEN} portion of the dial string
 Dial(zap/1/my_sip_numberww${EXTEN});
  to the second * box.  It tends to not see the DTMF correctly for the number I
 want to call.  When I watch this on the CLI through SSH on the second box i
 see the call come in and go to the correct extension where it waits for
 digits to dial and I get sporadic results, sometimes no digits are recognized
 and sometimes 2 or 3, but never all correctly. I have tried increasing, and
 decreasing the wait in the dial string in my home * with no luck.  Any hints
 on how to get the 3000 and the * box to talk better?  If I could get this to
 work through the 3000 I would be a very happy camper as it would open up some
 possibilities that I can't do cost effectively otherwise.  I will start to
 route all local calls out the 3000 though for testing in the mean time.
 Thanks for the ideas,
 John M
 On Tuesday June 20 2006 10:16 am, Doug Crompton wrote:
  Ok Now I understand. You mentioned you have an SPA-3000 in your inventory.
  That is what I use here and I do not load or use zap or pri modules. I use
  the 3000 as my fxo/fxs via sip on my local network. I have no cards in my
  computer. You could do the same for testing of your problem.
 
  Doug
 
  On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, John Millican wrote:
   Okay here goes,
   I guess I misunderstood Doug's question about the far end interface. I
   have no availability for high speed internet at my house to place a VoIP
   call over. So, I have a standard phone plugged into the PAP2, The PAP2
   plugs into the network at my house to which the asterisk box is also
   connected,  the asterisk box has an FXO card that has the PSTN line
   plugged into it, this is where the ZAP channel comes in.  when i dial a
   local number asterisk simple dials the number out the pstn line.  If i
   dial a long distance number, the * box dials a local phone number that I
   have through my VoIP provider which is answered by an * box that I have
   at a different location using a line in extensions.conf like:
   Dial(zap/1/my_sip_numberww${EXTEN});
   this way when the second * answers the phone it get the ${EXTEN} that I
   actually dialed and dials it out over the cable connection.  I hope i was
   a little clearer this time and sorry for the confusion.
   John M
 
  
  *  Doug Crompton   *
  *  Richboro, PA 18954  *
  *  215-431-6307*
  *  *
  * [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
  * http://www.crompton.com  *
  
 
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] DTMF Talk off

2006-06-19 Thread Doug Crompton
Check


http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-January/078141.html

On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, John Millican wrote:

 Hello all,
 I have seen some chatter again about DTMF.  I see most of the talk about DTMF
 around not being able to get an external IVR to recognize digits, not a big
 issue for me at this time but sill interesting.  My issue though, is with
 talk off on a zap channel.  It seems to be getting worse or maybe my patience
 is thinning.  All my calls go out and come in pstn through an FXO as I do not
 have high speed available here at home.  My Current setup is:

 Phone--PAP2-- * ---PSTN---Voip number to * at another location(that has
 high speed)---send to VoIP provider

 I read a post about talked about the length of the DTMFish sound.  I also
 remeber seing something about relaxdtmf being set to something other than yes
 or no, so I looked in chan_zap.c and found  relaxdtmf in many places but it
 looked to my inexperienced eye that it could only be set to 'yes' or 'no',
 but i did find some mention of tonlength (at line 10858)
 followed that to zaptel.c (line 3357) where it said :
 if ((tdp.dtmf_tonelen  4000 ) || (tdp.dtmf_tonelen  10 ))
 return -EINVAL
 Which I am guessing means unless the dtmf is between these 2 values ignore it.
 Any ideas what might happen if i increased the minimum time value? if this is
 indeed what this is referring to?


 Zapata.conf:
 [channels]
 callwaiting=yes
 callwaitingcallerid=yes
 threewaycalling=yes
 transfer=yes
 cancallforward=yes
 busydetect=yes
 busycount=6
 echocancel=128
 echocancelwhenbridged=yes
 echotraining=yes
 rxgain=0
 txgain=0
 immediate=no
 context=default
 signalling=fxs_ks
 channel = 1
 same for channel 2

 zaptel.conf:
 loadzone = us
 fxsks=1
 fxsks=2

 extensions.conf:
 exten = s,1,  NoOp(${CALLERID} time ${DATETIME});
 exten = s,2,  Dial(sip/677sip/666,30,tT);
 exten = a bunch of stuff to do with agi look ups and voicemail
 leave/retrieve

 All very basic and works like a charm except for the talk off.
 Thanks in advance to all,
 John M

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
 deserve neither liberty nor safety.  -- Ben Franklin (1759)


*  Doug Crompton   *
*  Richboro, PA 18954  *
*  215-431-6307*
*  *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
* http://www.crompton.com  *



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >