Re: [asterisk-users] phones behind nat

2015-09-11 Thread Carlos Chavez

On 9/11/15 12:59 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:

I have a setup where I have polycom phones in an office, behind firewall,
going out to a server located elsewhere. I have set
nat=force_rport,comedia for my phones.

so if I call OUT to my cell I get audio both ways and the call is fine.

My issue is if I call phone to phone in the office the phone doesnt
even ring. The CLI shows I'm calling the correct extension like SIP/524.

I am using asterisk 11.19.0

Is there another setting to correctly to this type of calling?

Thanks,

Jerry

There are usually two issues that can cause this behaviour.  One is 
that you do not have a correct "localnet" definition and the other is 
that you have directmedia=yes on your sip.conf.


--
Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de México S.A. de C.V.
Carlos Chávez
+52 (55)9116-91161

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] phones behind nat

2015-09-11 Thread Jerry Geis
I have a setup where I have polycom phones in an office, behind firewall,
going out to a server located elsewhere. I have set
nat=force_rport,comedia for my phones.

so if I call OUT to my cell I get audio both ways and the call is fine.

My issue is if I call phone to phone in the office the phone doesnt
even ring. The CLI shows I'm calling the correct extension like SIP/524.

I am using asterisk 11.19.0

Is there another setting to correctly to this type of calling?

Thanks,

Jerry
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] phones behind nat

2015-09-11 Thread Steve Edwards

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Jerry Geis wrote:

My issue is if I call phone to phone in the office the phone doesnt even 
ring. The CLI shows I'm calling the correct extension like SIP/524.


The lack of sufficient connectivity to signal ringing suggests taking a 
peek with wireshark may be fruitful as well as reviewing the configuration 
of the endpoints.


Can you check the web page on the phones to confirm the IP addresses and 
netmasks are as expected? (What you think your configuration does is less 
important than what the phone thinks it does.)


I recently broke a lot of things between my office and my home when I 
decided to split 192.168.0.0 with a 255.255.255.128 net mask.


I also recently broke a working configuration by running Asterisk and 
OpenSIPS on 5060. The phones would ring but could not answer. Lost a lot 
of time until I started confirming the really basic stuff and entered 
'sudo netstat -a -n -p | grep 5060'


--
Thanks in advance,
-
Steve Edwards   sedwa...@sedwards.com  Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones don't stop ringing when queue is answered

2015-05-08 Thread James Thomas
A few things I would try-
Change WaitExten to Wait(2)
Change Queue(queue_level_1,rtnC,18) to Queue(queue_level_1,rtnC,,,18)
Add an Answer() after the first Wait(2)
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Phones don't stop ringing when queue is answered

2015-05-07 Thread Andrew Martin
James,

The WaitExten()s just provide a pause between the two Queue() calls to
let the first group of phones finish ringing. In this example I am ringing
the same group (queue_level_1) twice, however in a real-world scenario I 
would ring queue_level_1 and then ring queue_level_2 which each have a 
different list of phones.

Thanks,

Andrew

- Original Message -
 From: James Thomas jthomas...@gmail.com
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2015 10:20:10 AM
 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Phones don't stop ringing when queue is answered
 
 What purpose do the WaitExten()s serve here? Are you really allowing the
 caller to connect to different extensions in the test-queue context? Have
 you tried without the WaitExten()s?
 
 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones don't stop ringing when queue is answered

2015-05-07 Thread James Thomas
What purpose do the WaitExten()s serve here? Are you really allowing the
caller to connect to different extensions in the test-queue context? Have
you tried without the WaitExten()s?
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Phones flashing but not ringing

2013-10-07 Thread Matt Hamilton
We have been using Asterisk SLA for a while with Cisco SPA series phones. Once 
in a while the phones flash, but not ring when a call comes in. We can pick it 
up and talk to the caller even if that's the case. 

This is pretty random (might not happen for couple of weeks). The quick 
solution is to restart Asterisk which we are trying to avoid. What might cause 
this? 

Thanks,
Matt
  -- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Phones flashing but not ringing

2013-10-07 Thread jg
Have you tried restarting the phone instead of Asterisk? I don't think that Asterisk sends 
separate commands to the bell and to the call LED. Since the LED is flashing, it is likely that 
the SIP INVITE signal from Asterisk is ok. Also the ring tone normally does not come from 
Asterisk itself.


jg

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones flashing but not ringing

2013-10-07 Thread Matt Hamilton

 Have you tried restarting the phone instead of Asterisk? I don't think that 
 Asterisk sends 
 separate commands to the bell and to the call LED. Since the LED is flashing, 
 it is likely that 
 the SIP INVITE signal from Asterisk is ok. Also the ring tone normally does 
 not come from 
 Asterisk itself.
 

We tried it and it doesn't help. It's not one phone, multiple phones do it at 
the same time. I think it's related to Asterisk SLA  - maybe device states get 
messed up.

Matt
  -- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Phones flapping with * and Sonicwall.

2011-10-13 Thread Mike Diehl
Hi all,

I've got a bunch of Polycom 301's at a site that sits behind a Sonicwall 
firewall. 

What I'm seeing is that the phones are constantly becoming unavailable, 
followed shortly by becoming available again.

The phones register just fine and sound great on out-bound calls.  The phones 
are configured NAT=yes and type=friend, as I do with all my Polycoms.

A sniffer trace indicates that Asterisk is sending an OPTIONS request to the 
phones but no reply is being sent... most of the time.

I'm thinking it's a firewall/NAT timeout issue.  Has anyone seen this?  Has 
anyone fixed it?  Any ideas, otherwise?

TIA.


-- 

Take care and have fun,
Mike Diehl.

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones flapping with * and Sonicwall.

2011-10-13 Thread Patrick Lists

On 10/13/2011 06:21 PM, Mike Diehl wrote:

I'm thinking it's a firewall/NAT timeout issue.  Has anyone seen this?  Has
anyone fixed it?  Any ideas, otherwise?


Did you try turning off the SIP ALG on the Sonicwall?

Regards,
Patrick

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
  http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones flapping with * and Sonicwall.

2011-10-13 Thread Luke Hamburg
Have you tried adding 'qualify=no' in the peer definition?

Are all the natted phones using port 5060 as their SIP port?  I don't know
how many a bunch is but if it's  not too many you might try having each
phone bind to a different port for its SIP signaling, sometimes that is
helpful with strict firewalls. 

e.g.  
Mary x102  use port 50102
John x114  use port 50114

This port would need to be set at the endpoint itself either manually or via
the provisioning server, setting it in Asterisk has no effect.  Just an
idea.

Luke

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mike Diehl
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 12:22 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Phones flapping with * and Sonicwall.

Hi all,

I've got a bunch of Polycom 301's at a site that sits behind a Sonicwall
firewall. 

What I'm seeing is that the phones are constantly becoming unavailable,
followed shortly by becoming available again.

The phones register just fine and sound great on out-bound calls.  The
phones are configured NAT=yes and type=friend, as I do with all my Polycoms.

A sniffer trace indicates that Asterisk is sending an OPTIONS request to the
phones but no reply is being sent... most of the time.

I'm thinking it's a firewall/NAT timeout issue.  Has anyone seen this?  Has
anyone fixed it?  Any ideas, otherwise?

TIA.


-- 

Take care and have fun,
Mike Diehl.




--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones flapping with * and Sonicwall.

2011-10-13 Thread Mike Diehl
Looks like we fixed it.  The NAT session defaulted to 30 seconds...!  When we 
increased it to 2 minutes, the problem went away!

Thank you for your time!

Mike.

On Thursday 13 October 2011 1:00:49 pm Luke Hamburg wrote:
 Have you tried adding 'qualify=no' in the peer definition?
 
 Are all the natted phones using port 5060 as their SIP port?  I don't know
 how many a bunch is but if it's  not too many you might try having each
 phone bind to a different port for its SIP signaling, sometimes that is
 helpful with strict firewalls.
 
 e.g.
 Mary x102  use port 50102
 John x114  use port 50114
 
 This port would need to be set at the endpoint itself either manually or
 via the provisioning server, setting it in Asterisk has no effect.  Just
 an idea.
 
 Luke
 
 -Original Message-
 From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
 [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mike Diehl
 Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 12:22 PM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: [asterisk-users] Phones flapping with * and Sonicwall.
 
 Hi all,
 
 I've got a bunch of Polycom 301's at a site that sits behind a Sonicwall
 firewall.
 
 What I'm seeing is that the phones are constantly becoming unavailable,
 followed shortly by becoming available again.
 
 The phones register just fine and sound great on out-bound calls.  The
 phones are configured NAT=yes and type=friend, as I do with all my
 Polycoms.
 
 A sniffer trace indicates that Asterisk is sending an OPTIONS request to
 the phones but no reply is being sent... most of the time.
 
 I'm thinking it's a firewall/NAT timeout issue.  Has anyone seen this?  Has
 anyone fixed it?  Any ideas, otherwise?
 
 TIA.

-- 

Take care and have fun,
Mike Diehl.

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones don't stop ringing

2010-11-17 Thread Chris Gentle
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Paulo Santos paulo.r.san...@sapo.ptwrote:

 Hello list,

 I'm having some issues with some phones that don't stop ringing after
 the call is answered somewhere else.

 Basically, a call comes, enters a queue and all the phones in the queue
 ring. The problem is that when the call is answered, some phones don't
 stop ringing.


What version are you using?  I'm having a similar problem with 1.8.0.
Yesterday I was expecting a call at home and I modified my dialplan to ring
my work number via GoogleVoice along with the other phones in the house.
When the call came through I answered it at work but my wife said all the
phones in the house continued to ring, apparently until the call was
completed.  I haven't done any debugging on it yet.

-- 
Chris
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Phones don't stop ringing

2010-11-10 Thread Paulo Santos
Hello list,

I'm having some issues with some phones that don't stop ringing after
the call is answered somewhere else.

Basically, a call comes, enters a queue and all the phones in the queue
ring. The problem is that when the call is answered, some phones don't
stop ringing.

I don't know if it is a configuration file, but I don't think so.

queues.conf, sip.conf and extensions.conf:

http://pastebin.com/8TTHpk4Z

I've also captured a moment when this occurred:

http://b.imagehost.org/0630/sip_flow.png

The green one is the one that didn't stop ringing. The phone sends the
first 180 Ringing _after_ the call is answered.

This can be a network issue or a buggy firmware on the phones, but
either way, shouldn't Asterisk send a CANCEL to an INVITE even if the
phone didn't send 180 Ringing?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Paulo Santos

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones slow to ring

2010-11-05 Thread jy
It worked!  I['ll have to figure out how to add the dial string to the
phone.

Thanks a bunch for your help

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Mark Phillips g7...@g7ltt.com wrote:

 I would second that.

 If you don't set a dial string in your handset then it waits for N
 seconds before submitting the call. Pressing # will force an immediate
 dial.

 Mark

 On 11/04/2010 07:19 PM, Cary Fitch wrote:
  Watch the console as you dial.  Dial the number and “#”.  The ring
  should be “instant”. Or if not, look at the console and report what you
 see.
 
  Cary Fitch
 
  
 
  *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
  [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *jy
  *Sent:* Thursday, November 04, 2010 5:32 PM
  *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
  *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Phones slow to ring
 
  I am new to asterisk and using it for a research project. Have set up an
  server (version 1.6.2.6) and 2 SIP phones (Linksys spa901) which are
  registering fine with the server. They are able to call one another,
  however, the problem is it takes roughly 8-10 seconds for the called
  phone to ring. I have a really simple dialplan using only 4 digit
  extensions and have turned off callerid. Both phones are on the same
  subnet and I have enabled nat and keepalive.
 
  Does anyone have an idea what could be wrong here or idea on how to
  debug this problem?
 
  Thanks,
  John
 

 --


 /\/\ark Phillips


 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Phones slow to ring

2010-11-04 Thread jy
I am new to asterisk and using it for a research project.  Have set up an
server (version 1.6.2.6) and 2 SIP phones (Linksys spa901) which are
registering fine with the server.  They are able to call one another,
however, the problem is it takes roughly 8-10 seconds for the called phone
to ring.  I have a really simple dialplan using only 4 digit extensions and
have turned off callerid. Both phones are on the same subnet and I have
enabled nat and keepalive.

Does anyone have an idea what could be wrong here or idea on how to debug
this problem?

Thanks,
John
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Phones slow to ring

2010-11-04 Thread Cary Fitch
Watch the console as you dial.  Dial the number and #.  The ring should be
instant.  Or if not, look at the console and report what you see.

 

Cary Fitch

 

  _  

From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of jy
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 5:32 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Phones slow to ring

 

I am new to asterisk and using it for a research project.  Have set up an
server (version 1.6.2.6) and 2 SIP phones (Linksys spa901) which are
registering fine with the server.  They are able to call one another,
however, the problem is it takes roughly 8-10 seconds for the called phone
to ring.  I have a really simple dialplan using only 4 digit extensions and
have turned off callerid. Both phones are on the same subnet and I have
enabled nat and keepalive.

Does anyone have an idea what could be wrong here or idea on how to debug
this problem?

Thanks,
John

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Phones slow to ring

2010-11-04 Thread Mark Phillips
I would second that.

If you don't set a dial string in your handset then it waits for N 
seconds before submitting the call. Pressing # will force an immediate dial.

Mark

On 11/04/2010 07:19 PM, Cary Fitch wrote:
 Watch the console as you dial.  Dial the number and “#”.  The ring
 should be “instant”. Or if not, look at the console and report what you see.

 Cary Fitch

 

 *From:* asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
 [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *jy
 *Sent:* Thursday, November 04, 2010 5:32 PM
 *To:* asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 *Subject:* [asterisk-users] Phones slow to ring

 I am new to asterisk and using it for a research project. Have set up an
 server (version 1.6.2.6) and 2 SIP phones (Linksys spa901) which are
 registering fine with the server. They are able to call one another,
 however, the problem is it takes roughly 8-10 seconds for the called
 phone to ring. I have a really simple dialplan using only 4 digit
 extensions and have turned off callerid. Both phones are on the same
 subnet and I have enabled nat and keepalive.

 Does anyone have an idea what could be wrong here or idea on how to
 debug this problem?

 Thanks,
 John


-- 


/\/\ark Phillips


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones won't stop ringing

2010-03-12 Thread Phil Reynolds
Quoting Jason Aarons (US) jason.aar...@us.didata.com:

 I'm experiencing runaway ringing too, can we make this a class action
 against someone?

Strangely enough, I have experienced this on what is a small domestic  
system - when a call is answered, sometimes other SIP phones  
(softphones only tried so far) keep ringing when the call is answered  
on a Zap or IAX phone - I think I have also had it happen when the  
answering phone was a SIP phone.

It happens just occasionally, but can be a bit of a nuisance.

Zap phones have never rung on and I can't remember it happening with  
an IAX phone.

-- 
Phil Reynolds
mail: phil-aster...@tinsleyviaduct.com
Web: http://www.tinsleyviaduct.com/phil/
Waltham 66, Emley Moor 69, Droitwich 79, Windows 95



This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones won't stop ringing

2010-03-11 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:27:46PM -0600, Chris Owen wrote:
 On Mar 10, 2010, at 9:05 PM, Warren Selby wrote:
 
  On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Chris Owen ow...@hubris.net wrote:
  
  This normally works fine but occasionally when someone picks up the call 
  other phones don't seem to realize the call has been answered and will 
  continue to ring.   On at least once occasion I saw a call that went to 
  voicemail and all the phones continued to ring.   When this happens the 
  phones will continue to ring forever.   The only way to stop them from 
  ringing is to pickup the handset at which time they realize there is no 
  call and reset.
  
  What kind of phones?
 
 All Aastra 6755i

I don't have any useful insight here. Thus the obvious thing to sugget
is that you try to provide a SIP-level trace of such an event (sip debug
peer PHONE_NAME)

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406   mailto:tzafrir.co...@xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:gu...@local.xorcom.com/tzafrir

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Phones won't stop ringing

2010-03-10 Thread Chris Owen

We're having an issue that isn't easily googleable so I thought I might might 
try here.

We have several customers who want all their extensions to ring on incoming 
calls.   Frankly I think it is craziness to ring 11 extensions all at once but 
that is how they want it.

We're doing this by creating an incoming route that goes to a hunt list 
containing all the extensions.

This normally works fine but occasionally when someone picks up the call other 
phones don't seem to realize the call has been answered and will continue to 
ring.   On at least once occasion I saw a call that went to voicemail and all 
the phones continued to ring.   When this happens the phones will continue to 
ring forever.   The only way to stop them from ringing is to pickup the handset 
at which time they realize there is no call and reset.

I'm pretty sure the underlying cause of this problem is funkiness in their 
network but it just seems to happen too easily and then once it stops it won't 
stop.Even if this is caused by network issues is there anything I can do to 
mitigate the problem.   Just seems wrong that the phones would continue to ring 
forever.

Chris


-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones won't stop ringing

2010-03-10 Thread Warren Selby
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Chris Owen ow...@hubris.net wrote:


 This normally works fine but occasionally when someone picks up the call
 other phones don't seem to realize the call has been answered and will
 continue to ring.   On at least once occasion I saw a call that went to
 voicemail and all the phones continued to ring.   When this happens the
 phones will continue to ring forever.   The only way to stop them from
 ringing is to pickup the handset at which time they realize there is no call
 and reset.


What kind of phones?
-- 
Thanks,
--Warren Selby
http://www.selbytech.com
-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Phones won't stop ringing

2010-03-10 Thread Jeff Brower
Chris-

Sounds like the Toyota bug has migrated to Asterisk... it's mutated into 
runaway ringing :-)

-Jeff

Sorry for my attempt at levity; just couldn't help it plus I'm sure Digium guys 
will know how to resolve.


 We're having an issue that isn't easily googleable so I thought I might might 
 try here.

 We have several customers who want all their extensions to ring on incoming 
 calls.   Frankly I think it is craziness
 to ring 11 extensions all at once but that is how they want it.

 We're doing this by creating an incoming route that goes to a hunt list 
 containing all the extensions.

 This normally works fine but occasionally when someone picks up the call 
 other phones don't seem to realize the call
 has been answered and will continue to ring.   On at least once occasion I 
 saw a call that went to voicemail and all
 the phones continued to ring.   When this happens the phones will continue to 
 ring forever.   The only way to stop
 them from ringing is to pickup the handset at which time they realize there 
 is no call and reset.

 I'm pretty sure the underlying cause of this problem is funkiness in their 
 network but it just seems to happen too
 easily and then once it stops it won't stop.Even if this is caused by 
 network issues is there anything I can do to
 mitigate the problem.   Just seems wrong that the phones would continue to 
 ring forever.

 Chris


 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones won't stop ringing

2010-03-10 Thread Chris Owen
On Mar 10, 2010, at 9:05 PM, Warren Selby wrote:

 On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Chris Owen ow...@hubris.net wrote:
 
 This normally works fine but occasionally when someone picks up the call 
 other phones don't seem to realize the call has been answered and will 
 continue to ring.   On at least once occasion I saw a call that went to 
 voicemail and all the phones continued to ring.   When this happens the 
 phones will continue to ring forever.   The only way to stop them from 
 ringing is to pickup the handset at which time they realize there is no call 
 and reset.
 
 What kind of phones?

All Aastra 6755i

Chris

-
Chris Owen - Garden City (620) 275-1900 -  Lottery (noun):
President  - Wichita (316) 858-3000 -A stupidity tax
Hubris Communications Inc  www.hubris.net
-





-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones won't stop ringing

2010-03-10 Thread Jason Aarons (US)
I'm experiencing runaway ringing too, can we make this a class action
against someone?

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
Brower
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:20 PM
To: Chris Owen
Cc: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Phones won't stop ringing

Chris-

Sounds like the Toyota bug has migrated to Asterisk... it's mutated into
runaway ringing :-)

-Jeff

Sorry for my attempt at levity; just couldn't help it plus I'm sure
Digium guys will know how to resolve.


 We're having an issue that isn't easily googleable so I thought I
might might try here.

 We have several customers who want all their extensions to ring on
incoming calls.   Frankly I think it is craziness
 to ring 11 extensions all at once but that is how they want it.

 We're doing this by creating an incoming route that goes to a hunt
list containing all the extensions.

 This normally works fine but occasionally when someone picks up the
call other phones don't seem to realize the call
 has been answered and will continue to ring.   On at least once
occasion I saw a call that went to voicemail and all
 the phones continued to ring.   When this happens the phones will
continue to ring forever.   The only way to stop
 them from ringing is to pickup the handset at which time they realize
there is no call and reset.

 I'm pretty sure the underlying cause of this problem is funkiness in
their network but it just seems to happen too
 easily and then once it stops it won't stop.Even if this is caused
by network issues is there anything I can do to
 mitigate the problem.   Just seems wrong that the phones would
continue to ring forever.

 Chris


 --
 _
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
 New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.

-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones won't stop ringing

2010-03-10 Thread cb
On Mar 10, 2010, at 10:27 PM, Chris Owen wrote:

 This normally works fine but occasionally when someone picks up the  
 call other phones don't seem to realize the call has been answered  
 and will continue to ring.   On at least once occasion I saw a call  
 that went to voicemail and all the phones continued to ring.   When  
 this happens the phones will continue to ring forever.   The only  
 way to stop them from ringing is to pickup the handset at which  
 time they realize there is no call and reset.

 What kind of phones?

 All Aastra 6755i


I've been seeing this lately on Cisco 7940, seems to happen on two of  
the three at a location I deal with. They worked fine for years and  
then all of a sudden this just started happening. Rebooting the phone  
will cure it for a period of time, but it always comes back, and  
always to the same two phones (although not always at the same time).  
I don't think anything changed when it started happening, but I can't  
say for sure.

It may also happen on a Polycom at that location as well, reports on  
that one have been sketchy, so I can't be sure it really is versus  
they are hearing a 2nd call ringing and just think the phone is stuck  
ringing. (I do know for a fact it happens with the Cisco and is not  
simply a 2nd call).

I had figured it was the old version of Asterisk I'm running and the  
fact that the server has had several power failures so who knows the  
health of the machine and install. But if it is happening to others,  
my assumption may be wrong.

-chris
www.mythtech.net



-- 
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones dropping registration, but asterisk thinks phones are still registered

2009-06-29 Thread James Lamanna
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:08 AM, James Lamannajlama...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
 I have a serious problem with Asterisk 1.4.18.
 Every so often, usually after Asterisk has been running for a few days
 consistently, phones start dropping registrations.
 However, when this happens, doing a sip show peer on those
 extensions shows them as OK.
 Therefore, I have no way to tell this problem is happening until
 customers start calling.
 The only way to fix it is to completely restart Asterisk.

 Has anyone experienced this? This is a serious problem.
 I've poured over the logs while and after this happens and there is
 nothing in the logs that would suggest there is a problem.

 This is a production server, so I can't just upgrade Asterisk to the
 latest 1.4 version.

I know people have suggested upgrading the server, but I'm not in a
position to do that right now.
However, I believe there is a symptom. When I do a sip show peer on an
affected phone,
the expire time is NEGATIVE. I think this might be contributing to the
problem, and why Asterisk
thinks the phone is still registered.

Thanks.

-- James

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones dropping registration, but asterisk thinks phones are still registered

2009-06-29 Thread Danny Nicholas
Why can't you just do a daily/weekly cron to restart when convenient in
off/slow hours for local time.  Is your business constantly on-line 24/7?

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of James Lamanna
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 3:23 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Phones dropping registration,but asterisk
thinks phones are still registered

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:08 AM, James Lamannajlama...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
 I have a serious problem with Asterisk 1.4.18.
 Every so often, usually after Asterisk has been running for a few days
 consistently, phones start dropping registrations.
 However, when this happens, doing a sip show peer on those
 extensions shows them as OK.
 Therefore, I have no way to tell this problem is happening until
 customers start calling.
 The only way to fix it is to completely restart Asterisk.

 Has anyone experienced this? This is a serious problem.
 I've poured over the logs while and after this happens and there is
 nothing in the logs that would suggest there is a problem.

 This is a production server, so I can't just upgrade Asterisk to the
 latest 1.4 version.

I know people have suggested upgrading the server, but I'm not in a
position to do that right now.
However, I believe there is a symptom. When I do a sip show peer on an
affected phone,
the expire time is NEGATIVE. I think this might be contributing to the
problem, and why Asterisk
thinks the phone is still registered.

Thanks.

-- James

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones dropping registration, but asterisk thinks phones are still registered

2009-06-29 Thread Christopher Stamper
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:23 PM, James Lamanna jlama...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:08 AM, James Lamannajlama...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi,
  I have a serious problem with Asterisk 1.4.18.
  Every so often, usually after Asterisk has been running for a few days
  consistently, phones start dropping registrations.
  However, when this happens, doing a sip show peer on those
  extensions shows them as OK.
  Therefore, I have no way to tell this problem is happening until
  customers start calling.
  The only way to fix it is to completely restart Asterisk.
 
  Has anyone experienced this?


Yes, I've experienced the same thing. Not sure right now what Asterisk
version I'm using, prob the latest in the Ubuntu 8.04 repos.

Just my 2c, fwiw.


-- 
Christopher Stamper

Email: christopherstam...@gmail.com
Web: http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg
gTalk: http://tinyurl.com/6e359r
Skype: cdstamper
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Phones dropping registration, but asterisk thinks phones are still registered

2009-06-29 Thread James Lamanna
 Why can't you just do a daily/weekly cron to restart when convenient in
 off/slow hours for local time.  Is your business constantly on-line 24/7?


I have tried that. Unfortunately restart when convenient doesn't
always seem to actually restart
asterisk, presumably because there are stuck calls or something. Very
annoying as well.

-- James

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:08 AM, James Lamannajlama...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,
 I have a serious problem with Asterisk 1.4.18.
 Every so often, usually after Asterisk has been running for a few days
 consistently, phones start dropping registrations.
 However, when this happens, doing a sip show peer on those
 extensions shows them as OK.
 Therefore, I have no way to tell this problem is happening until
 customers start calling.
 The only way to fix it is to completely restart Asterisk.

 Has anyone experienced this? This is a serious problem.
 I've poured over the logs while and after this happens and there is
 nothing in the logs that would suggest there is a problem.

 This is a production server, so I can't just upgrade Asterisk to the
latest 1.4 version.

 I know people have suggested upgrading the server, but I'm not in a
 position to do that right now.
 However, I believe there is a symptom. When I do a sip show peer on an
 affected phone,
 the expire time is NEGATIVE. I think this might be contributing to the
 problem, and why Asterisk
 thinks the phone is still registered.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones dropping registration, but asterisk thinks phones are still registered

2009-06-05 Thread Olivier
How many phones are concerned ?
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Phones dropping registration, but asterisk thinks phones are still registered

2009-06-05 Thread James Lamanna
Oliver wrote:

 How many phones are concerned ?

The box currently has about 380 active phone registrations.

Thanks.

Please CC me directly as well because I'm on digest mode.

-- James

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Phones dropping registration, but asterisk thinks phones are still registered

2009-06-04 Thread James Lamanna
Hi,
I have a serious problem with Asterisk 1.4.18.
Every so often, usually after Asterisk has been running for a few days
consistently, phones start dropping registrations.
However, when this happens, doing a sip show peer on those
extensions shows them as OK.
Therefore, I have no way to tell this problem is happening until
customers start calling.
The only way to fix it is to completely restart Asterisk.

Has anyone experienced this? This is a serious problem.
I've poured over the logs while and after this happens and there is
nothing in the logs that would suggest there is a problem.

This is a production server, so I can't just upgrade Asterisk to the
latest 1.4 version.

Thanks.

-- James

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones dropping registration, but asterisk thinks phones are still registered

2009-06-04 Thread Danny Nicholas
Not a real solution, but why don't you just set up a cron job to issue
asterisk -rx restart when convenient once a day?  This will restart
asterisk on the first zero load opportunity.

-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of James Lamanna
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 1:09 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Phones dropping registration,but asterisk thinks
phones are still registered

Hi,
I have a serious problem with Asterisk 1.4.18.
Every so often, usually after Asterisk has been running for a few days
consistently, phones start dropping registrations.
However, when this happens, doing a sip show peer on those
extensions shows them as OK.
Therefore, I have no way to tell this problem is happening until
customers start calling.
The only way to fix it is to completely restart Asterisk.

Has anyone experienced this? This is a serious problem.
I've poured over the logs while and after this happens and there is
nothing in the logs that would suggest there is a problem.

This is a production server, so I can't just upgrade Asterisk to the
latest 1.4 version.

Thanks.

-- James

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones dropping registration, but asterisk thinks phones are still registered

2009-06-04 Thread Philipp von Klitzing
Hi!

 I have a serious problem with Asterisk 1.4.18.
 Every so often, usually after Asterisk has been running for a few days
 consistently, phones start dropping registrations. However, when this
 happens, doing a sip show peer on those extensions shows them as
 OK. 

Please check if this is related (maybe, maybe not):

SIP stops working with multiple REGISTER statements in sip.conf
Registration fails if multiple peers are specified in sip.conf

https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15139

Philipp


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones dropping registration, but asterisk thinks phones are still registered

2009-06-04 Thread Darrick Hartman
There were some serious issues with some of the earlier 1.4.x Asterisk 
releases.  You say it's a production server and can't upgrade because of 
that.  That is the one reason why you should upgrade.  There are 
security risks with certain versions and some serious bugs that were 
fixed.  While I can't say that the problem with go away with an 
upgrade, you'll get better support if you are running a more recent version.

On 06/04/2009 01:08 PM, James Lamanna wrote:
 Hi,
 I have a serious problem with Asterisk 1.4.18.
 Every so often, usually after Asterisk has been running for a few days
 consistently, phones start dropping registrations.
 However, when this happens, doing a sip show peer on those
 extensions shows them as OK.
 Therefore, I have no way to tell this problem is happening until
 customers start calling.
 The only way to fix it is to completely restart Asterisk.

 Has anyone experienced this? This is a serious problem.
 I've poured over the logs while and after this happens and there is
 nothing in the logs that would suggest there is a problem.

 This is a production server, so I can't just upgrade Asterisk to the
 latest 1.4 version.



___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones lose contact

2008-10-17 Thread Jerry Jones

On Oct 17, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Paul Douglas Franklin wrote:

 When off site, our IP phones lose contact after a few minutes of
 inactivity.  They no longer receive calls, though they can call out.
 Asterisk acts as if it is ringing the phone, but the phone does not  
 ring.
 The phones are behind a NAT/firewall.
 What is the most reasonable solution?

qualify=yes


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] phones start ringing randomly with Grandstream GXW-40XX - solution!

2008-03-09 Thread Faraz Khan
Thought i would share this so it doesnt annoy others as much as it did me :)

If you recently installed a GXW 40XX and your extensions start ringing  
magically now (ringing for no reason, pick it up its a clear tone) you  
need to check the Disable send MWI in your gateway. apparently  
certain old phones do not like the MWI signal and treat it like a ring  
tone.



-- 
Faraz R Khan
Chief Architect
Emergen Consulting Pvt Ltd
www.emergen.biz


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Phones Not Registering

2007-11-22 Thread Edwin Kariuki
Hi,

I have a voip platform that has a SIP server where about 450 sipura phones  
adaptors register. On two occassions some phones (which were previously 
working) have refused to register with certain IPs but when I change the IP the 
phones register. The failing IP can the work after two days.

A trace from the server shows that the phone is sending a registration signal 
to the server  that the server is also sending back the same but its not 
getting to the phone.

What could be the cause of this?

Thanks,

Edwin

   
-
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.  Make Yahoo! your homepage.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Phones Not Registering

2007-11-22 Thread Benjamin Jacob
The reason could be bad routing, IPs used by multiple devices.. n so on...



Edwin Kariuki wrote:

 Hi,

 I have a voip platform that has a SIP server where about 450 sipura 
 phones  adaptors register. On two occassions some phones (which were 
 previously working) have refused to register with certain IPs but when 
 I change the IP the phones register. The failing IP can the work after 
 two days.

 A trace from the server shows that the phone is sending a registration 
 signal to the server  that the server is also sending back the same 
 but its not getting to the phone.

 What could be the cause of this?

 Thanks,

 Edwin

 
 Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your 
 homepage. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51443/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



EMAIL DISCLAIMER : This email and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to 
whom they are addressed. Any unauthorised distribution or copying is strictly 
prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify the sender 
by reply email and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions and other 
information in this message that do not relate to official business of Mascon 
shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by Mascon. Any information 
contained in this email, when addressed to Mascon clients is subject to the 
terms and conditions in governing client contract.

Whilst Mascon takes steps to prevent the transmission of viruses via e-mail, we 
can not guarantee that any email or attachment is free from computer viruses 
and you are strongly advised to undertake your own anti-virus precautions. 
Mascon grants no warranties regarding performance, use or quality of any e-mail 
or attachment and undertakes no liability for loss or damage, howsoever caused. 



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones Not Registering

2007-11-22 Thread Brett Crapser

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Edwin Kariuki wrote:
 Hi,

 I have a voip platform that has a SIP server where about 450 sipura 
 phones  adaptors register. On two occassions some phones (which were 
 previously working) have refused to register with certain IPs but when I 
 change the IP the phones register. The failing IP can the work after two 
 days.

 A trace from the server shows that the phone is sending a registration 
 signal to the server  that the server is also sending back the same but 
 its not getting to the phone.

 What could be the cause of this?

What kind of voip platform?
What SIP server?
Out over the Internet or local lan or a VPN?

Going to need a lot more information...

Brett

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones Not Registering

2007-11-22 Thread Edwin Kariuki


Brett Crapser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Edwin Kariuki wrote:
 Hi,

 I have a voip platform that has a SIP server where about 450 sipura 
 phones  adaptors register. On two occassions some phones (which were 
 previously working) have refused to register with certain IPs but when I 
 change the IP the phones register. The failing IP can the work after two 
 days.

 A trace from the server shows that the phone is sending a registration 
 signal to the server  that the server is also sending back the same but 
 its not getting to the phone.

 What could be the cause of this?

What kind of voip platform?
What SIP server?
Out over the Internet or local lan or a VPN?

Going to need a lot more information...

Brett

The platform run on Linux  asterisk.
Devices register over the internet.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


   
-
Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Phones Not Registering

2007-11-22 Thread Gordon Henderson
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Edwin Kariuki wrote:



 Brett Crapser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Edwin Kariuki wrote:
 Hi,

 I have a voip platform that has a SIP server where about 450 sipura
 phones  adaptors register. On two occassions some phones (which were
 previously working) have refused to register with certain IPs but when I
 change the IP the phones register. The failing IP can the work after two
 days.

 A trace from the server shows that the phone is sending a registration
 signal to the server  that the server is also sending back the same but
 its not getting to the phone.

 What could be the cause of this?

 What kind of voip platform?
 What SIP server?
 Out over the Internet or local lan or a VPN?

 Going to need a lot more information...

 Brett

 The platform run on Linux  asterisk.
 Devices register over the internet.

Some random thoughts:

Too many NAT sessions for the router to track?
Running out of ARP table space on the Linux box if not going via NAT?

Gordon

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Phones fail to ring

2007-05-23 Thread Jim Suber
I have commented out the zapateller line now.
The problem persists.
I wonder if there is a problem with the tones generated by some cell phones
when choosing an extension. At this point the problem seems to come from
cell phones only. My wife, for instance was pressing send after choosing an
extension. I caught that in CLI. But one other assures me that he is not
doing so. They say it sounds to them as though it is ringing. No sound here
This problem is intermittent BTW.
Thanks

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Jenkins
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 9:58 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Phones fail to ring

Jim Suber wrote:
 I am somewhat confused. I have the incoming (s) context playing a 
 greeting and callers choose one of two extensions (100, or 101)
 
 To the caller it ALWAYS sounds as though the phone is ringing. However, 
 sometimes it is not actually ringing the phones
 
 The listext.wav file suggests extensions 100 or 101
 
  
 
 exten = s,1,Zapateller(nocallerid)
 
 exten = s,2,Answer()
 
 exten = s,3,Background(listext)
 
 exten = i,1,PlayBack(pbx-invalid)
 
 exten = i,2,Goto(incoming,s,1)
 
 exten = t,1,PlayBack(vm-goodbye)
 
 exten = t,2,Hangup()
 

Try putting the Answer() first.  See if that makes a difference.

-- 

Warm Regards,

Lee



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Phones fail to ring

2007-05-22 Thread Jim Suber
I am somewhat confused. I have the incoming (s) context playing a greeting
and callers choose one of two extensions (100, or 101)

To the caller it ALWAYS sounds as though the phone is ringing. However,
sometimes it is not actually ringing the phones 

The listext.wav file suggests extensions 100 or 101

 

exten = s,1,Zapateller(nocallerid)

exten = s,2,Answer()

exten = s,3,Background(listext)

exten = i,1,PlayBack(pbx-invalid)

exten = i,2,Goto(incoming,s,1)

exten = t,1,PlayBack(vm-goodbye)

exten = t,2,Hangup()

 

Thanks in advance

Jim

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones fail to ring

2007-05-22 Thread Lee Jenkins

Jim Suber wrote:
I am somewhat confused. I have the incoming (s) context playing a 
greeting and callers choose one of two extensions (100, or 101)


To the caller it ALWAYS sounds as though the phone is ringing. However, 
sometimes it is not actually ringing the phones


The listext.wav file suggests extensions 100 or 101

 


exten = s,1,Zapateller(nocallerid)

exten = s,2,Answer()

exten = s,3,Background(listext)

exten = i,1,PlayBack(pbx-invalid)

exten = i,2,Goto(incoming,s,1)

exten = t,1,PlayBack(vm-goodbye)

exten = t,2,Hangup()



Try putting the Answer() first.  See if that makes a difference.

--

Warm Regards,

Lee



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Phones working with 1.2.17, not with 1.4.2

2007-04-18 Thread Luca Corti
Hello,

I've got various phones (mostly SPA-922) behind NAT registered to
Asterisk. I've set nat=yes and canreinvite=no, and everything seemed to
work great with 1.2.17. After upgrading to 1.4.2 using users.conf and
macro-stdexten my spa-922 can't call other extensions.

-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Macro(SIP/22-b72006f0, stdexten|23|
SIP/23) in new stack
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Dial(SIP/22-b72006f0, SIP/23)
in new stack
-- Called 23
[Apr 18 12:29:16] NOTICE[3831]: chan_sip.c:2757 auto_congest:
Auto-congesting SIP/23-081db528
-- SIP/23-081db528 is circuit-busy
  == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/1/0)
  == Auto fallthrough, channel 'SIP/22-b72006f0' status is 'CONGESTION'

Debugging SIP messages seems that the called exten is not replying to
invites, but it registers correctly. Other phones (Siemens C450 IP) seem
to be able to call other extensions:

-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Macro(SIP/27-b72020e0, stdexten|22|
SIP/22) in new stack
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Dial(SIP/27-b72020e0, SIP/22)
in new stack
-- Called 22
-- SIP/22-081de4f8 is ringing

Phones configuration is unaltered. What could it be?

thanks

Luca

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] phones can make outgoing calls but no incoming

2007-01-13 Thread Carlos Rojas

Hello,

What's your sip.conf and extensions.conf?

Regards


On 1/12/07, kevin bergner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


i am having a problem where the phones are registered and can make
outgoing calls but all incoming calls go directly to voicemail and do not
ring any of the phones

any ideas?

--
kevin


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com http://easynews.com/--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] phones can make outgoing calls but no incoming

2007-01-12 Thread kevin bergner

i am having a problem where the phones are registered and can make outgoing
calls but all incoming calls go directly to voicemail and do not ring any of
the phones

any ideas?

--
kevin
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Phones cutting out.....again - PLEASE HELP!!!

2006-07-06 Thread whois wes

Hate to drag this one back up, butit's happening again.

Overview of architecture:

Dell poweredge 2850, running fedora core 4, asterisk 1.2.7.1, zaptel
1.2.5, and sangoma wanpipe 2.3.4 drivers. T1 interface card is the
sangoma a104d with onboard echo can.

Server is located in our data center and connected directly to our
cisco 6513 core switch, so we have almost zero latency. The office
having the issues is located several miles away and is connected via a
10Mbit fiber pipe, also low latency. Ping times between remote office
and here are well under 10ms.

T1's are robbed-bit, EM wink signalling --- (this may be cause, but
want your input).

Server load is averaging around 20%, plenty of memory, disk space, and
bandwidth available. No QOS running on network. ulaw is the primary
codec.  Server is stable, and there are no extraneous services
running, save mysql and httpd.  Even running a processor intensive
query doesn't trigger the droputs, they happen randomly.

Phones are a mix of Eyebeam 1.5.5 and Eyebeam 1.10 3010n. Both types
of phones are experiencing cutting out of the signal, mainly in the Rx
stream, but occassional in the Tx stream as well. The cutting out was
NOT occurring last night, and the phone server is being rebooted
nightly.  Nothing has changed AT ALL, and the problem has started
occurring again.  If I don't do ANYTHING at all today, there is a 50%
chance that this will NOT occur tomorrow.  In other words, SOMETHING
is causing our phones to drop out, but whatever changes I make seem to
have no effect.  The problem will start and stop seeminly at it's own
whim.

---
Things I have tried:

1.  changed from ulaw to gsm as primary codec - no change
2.  disabled hardware echo can on A104D - no change
3.  moved from asterisk 1.2.4 to 1.2.7.1, recompiled both several
times - no change
4.  have played with gain settings a bit, doesn't seem to make much difference
---

At this point, i am nearing the end of my rope - i have rebuilt this
machine three times now, and have recompiled the system at least a
dozen times. We have gone from Digium hardware to Sangoma harware and
back again. I have changed every conceivable setting on the phones to
no avail. The problem will randomly disappear, only to come back a few
days later. I can make a change, it seems to have an effect, then
we're back to the same old thing again.

I am in dire need of ANY help anyone can offer, this has been going on
in some form for almost three months.

Thanks for reading,

Wes
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Phones cutting out.....again - PLEASE HELP!!!

2006-07-06 Thread Andrew Kirch

 -Original Message-
 Thanks for reading,
 
 Wes
 ___

Please reply with the output of the following:
lspci -vv
lspci -vv | grep IRQ
lspci  
cat /proc/interrupts

Thank you.

Andrew
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Phones cutting out.....again - PLEASE HELP!!!

2006-07-06 Thread Dan Austin
snip
Server load is averaging around 20%, plenty of memory, disk space, and
bandwidth available. No QOS running on network. ulaw is the primary
codec.  Server is stable, and there are no extraneous services
running, save mysql and httpd.  Even running a processor intensive
query doesn't trigger the droputs, they happen randomly.
snip

You mention that the remote office is fiber connected, but don't
identify what equipment is used to at the ends of the fiber.  How
many people are in the remote office, what is their work process/habits,
do they also use this circuit for internet access?

The key to my questions is that I suspect you do need at least a
minimal QoS implimentation.  A quick check on the circuit utilization
when the issue occurs can confirm this, or eliminate it.

Dan
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones cutting out.....again - PLEASE HELP!!!

2006-07-06 Thread whois wes

Here ya go:

lspci -vv
---
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation E7520 Memory Controller Hub (rev 09)
Subsystem: Dell: Unknown device 016d
Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort-
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0
Capabilities: [40] Vendor Specific Information

00:02.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation E7525/E7520/E7320 PCI Express
Port A (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort-
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size 10
Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=03, sec-latency=0
Memory behind bridge: dfd0-dfff
Prefetchable memory behind bridge: d800-d800
Secondary status: 66Mhz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort-
TAbort- MAbort+ SERR+ PERR-
BridgeCtl: Parity+ SERR+ NoISA+ VGA- MAbort- Reset- FastB2B-
Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA 
PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [58] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/1 
Enable-
Address: fee0  Data: 
Capabilities: [64] Express Root Port (Slot-) IRQ 0
Device: Supported: MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0, ExtTag-
Device: Latency L0s 64ns, L1 1us
Device: Errors: Correctable+ Non-Fatal+ Fatal+ Unsupported-
Device: RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
Device: MaxPayload 256 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
Link: Supported Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x8, ASPM L0s, Port 2
Link: Latency L0s 4us, L1 unlimited
Link: ASPM Disabled RCB 64 bytes CommClk- ExtSynch-
Link: Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x8
Root: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- PME-

00:04.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation E7525/E7520 PCI Express Port B
(rev 09) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort-
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size 10
Bus: primary=00, secondary=04, subordinate=04, sec-latency=0
Secondary status: 66Mhz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort-
TAbort- MAbort+ SERR- PERR-
BridgeCtl: Parity+ SERR+ NoISA+ VGA- MAbort- Reset- FastB2B-
Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA 
PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [58] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/1 
Enable-
Address: fee0  Data: 
Capabilities: [64] Express Root Port (Slot-) IRQ 0
Device: Supported: MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0, ExtTag-
Device: Latency L0s 64ns, L1 1us
Device: Errors: Correctable+ Non-Fatal+ Fatal+ Unsupported-
Device: RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
Device: MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes
Link: Supported Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x8, ASPM L0s, Port 4
Link: Latency L0s 4us, L1 unlimited
Link: ASPM Disabled RCB 64 bytes Disabled CommClk- ExtSynch-
Link: Speed 2.5Gb/s, Width x8
Root: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- PME-

00:05.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation E7520 PCI Express Port B1 (rev
09) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort-
TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR-
Latency: 0, Cache Line Size 10
Bus: primary=00, secondary=05, subordinate=07, sec-latency=0
I/O behind bridge: e000-efff
Memory behind bridge: dfa0-dfcf
Secondary status: 66Mhz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort-
TAbort- MAbort+ SERR+ PERR-
BridgeCtl: Parity+ SERR+ NoISA+ VGA- MAbort- Reset- FastB2B-
Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA 
PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+)
Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
Capabilities: [58] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/1 
Enable-
Address: fee0  Data: 
Capabilities: [64] Express Root Port (Slot-) IRQ 0
Device: Supported: 

RE: [asterisk-users] Phones cutting out.....again - PLEASE HELP!!!

2006-07-06 Thread Alexander Lopez
Your problem is intermittent. It is probably Network related as if you
reboot that problems may or may not comeback.

In addition to the lspci stuff requested. Have you checked your
fiberlink. Is it possible that something or someone is saturating the
link with Virus/Spy/PtP Ware???

SIP doesn't have a Jitter Buffer so it is sensitive to the traffic. You
may want to try Olle's branch with the Jitter Buffer. See if that helps.
I think you are fine on the Hardware side of things. It is also possible
you got root-kitted.

SNIP.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [asterisk-users] Phones cutting out.....again - PLEASE HELP!! !

2006-07-06 Thread Colin Anderson
So you need a divide and conquer strategy here:

1. Is it Asterisk or the WAN? This should be easy enough to test for. Do
call dropouts happen in your datacentre? If not, your Asterisk install is
good. My money's on the 10mbit WAN pipe, and that's what I would be
focussing on.

2. If it's the WAN, is it a connectivity issue or a bandwidth issue? Do a
continous ping from the remote location to your Asterisk server for a day.
You should get NO packets dropped. If you are getting drops, it's a
connectivity issue and you have to look at your SLA to see what your
provider considers good. Otherwise, bandwidth issue.

3. If it's a bandwidth issue, is it your users doing things or is it a
service that is eating bandwidth? If it's a service that is aggregated to a
remote server, like email, then you can use bandwidth management tools like
AstShape or good old tc to severely retard available bandwidth to the
troublesome service. If it's your users, you have to determine what they are
doing. Look at patterns: Does it happen every Tuesday afternoon when you
know Bob from Accounting is running his reports?

4. Sounds like you are running Asterisk -- SIP -- 10mbit WAN -- SIP --
Phones - which probably is half the issue right there because of no
jitterbuffer. Dig up an old P-3, stick in Trixbox, run it out to your remote
location, and have your Eyebeam clients use *it* instead of your big
Asterisk server for local connectivity. Then tie your P-3 to your big
Asterisk server with IAX. Jitterbuffer + trunking = goodness and your P-3
won't choke under load if you avoid transcoding by using the same codec
end-to-end. Yes it will blow having to maintain two dialplans. But IAX works
frigging great. I use it to aggregate 30 remote locations over the *public*
Internet to my big Asterisk server, and I never get complaints of dropouts,
and in fact I use it extensively myself and IMO it sounds better* than the
local CableCo's VoIP offering, which is a big POS.

5. Regardless of what it actually is, I would have some sort of traffic
shaper at both ends of the WAN pipe. Again, dig up a couple of old P-2 or
P-3's and stick in a bootable Monowall CD, change the default rules to allow
all traffic through, but create a traffic shaping ruleset to give priority
and bandwidth to 5060, 4569, 1-2 and dump everything else to a low
priority queue. 

6. I'd run GSM anyway (even though you tried it) because it would eliminate
half your bandwidth consumption. Another variable eliminated.

hth

*By 'sounds better' I mean it sounds like a perfectly normal PSTN call, ALL
THE TIME in s d  of  co s an ly  s nd ng li e  t hs


-Original Message-
From: whois wes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 10:51 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Phones cutting out.again - PLEASE HELP!!!


Hate to drag this one back up, butit's happening again.

Overview of architecture:

Dell poweredge 2850, running fedora core 4, asterisk 1.2.7.1, zaptel
1.2.5, and sangoma wanpipe 2.3.4 drivers. T1 interface card is the
sangoma a104d with onboard echo can.

Server is located in our data center and connected directly to our
cisco 6513 core switch, so we have almost zero latency. The office
having the issues is located several miles away and is connected via a
10Mbit fiber pipe, also low latency. Ping times between remote office
and here are well under 10ms.

T1's are robbed-bit, EM wink signalling --- (this may be cause, but
want your input).

Server load is averaging around 20%, plenty of memory, disk space, and
bandwidth available. No QOS running on network. ulaw is the primary
codec.  Server is stable, and there are no extraneous services
running, save mysql and httpd.  Even running a processor intensive
query doesn't trigger the droputs, they happen randomly.

Phones are a mix of Eyebeam 1.5.5 and Eyebeam 1.10 3010n. Both types
of phones are experiencing cutting out of the signal, mainly in the Rx
stream, but occassional in the Tx stream as well. The cutting out was
NOT occurring last night, and the phone server is being rebooted
nightly.  Nothing has changed AT ALL, and the problem has started
occurring again.  If I don't do ANYTHING at all today, there is a 50%
chance that this will NOT occur tomorrow.  In other words, SOMETHING
is causing our phones to drop out, but whatever changes I make seem to
have no effect.  The problem will start and stop seeminly at it's own
whim.

---
Things I have tried:

1.  changed from ulaw to gsm as primary codec - no change
2.  disabled hardware echo can on A104D - no change
3.  moved from asterisk 1.2.4 to 1.2.7.1, recompiled both several
times - no change
4.  have played with gain settings a bit, doesn't seem to make much
difference
---

At this point, i am nearing the end of my rope - i have rebuilt this
machine three times now, and have recompiled the system at least a
dozen times. We have gone from Digium hardware to Sangoma harware

Re: [asterisk-users] Phones cutting out.....again - PLEASE HELP!! !

2006-07-06 Thread whois wes

Thanks for the quick responses everyone.

To answer some of the questions posed:

The main traffic going over this pipe is voice, with a small amount of
web traffic as well.  There are 60 total users, 5 of which access
anything other than what is on their LAN up there.  In any case, we
are not saturating the pipe, and our telco put some sort of filters on
the Optiman switches on each side to eliminate any jitter (or so they
say).

Prior to the filter being installed, we had our main application
server for that location located down here - when the issue started
(out of the blue, nothing really triggered it, and our bandwidth
didn't change or spike) we moved that server to the remote location.
So, before we even had the issue, we were using WAY more bandwidth,
almost 8Mbit at times...we're averaging around 2-3 now, and it rarely
spikes above that.

Also, when I connect to the server locally (the server is in the room
next to me, in other words, and i have 1 Gbit of bandwidth all the way
to the back of the server, I still get call dropouts.  In other words,
completely bypassing the fiber pipe results in the same problem.  For
that reason alone, I don't think it's the WAN (although I agree with
what all of you said in regards to QOS, etc, it's just not up to me to
implement that, even though it's been suggested numerous times).

However, this IS the only server (of 8 total, all in the same rack and
connected to the telco via the same DS3) that is having the issue,
which DOES point to it being the WAN, as that is our ONLY remote
location.

See why I'm frustrated?

I do like the idea of putting a local box up there and using an IAX
trunk over the pipe, and will see about getting that implemented.  GSM
was already shot down as 'too low-quality' - we'd rather up the pipe
to 20Mbit than go with a lower quality codec.

Sorry that I forgot to mention some of this in my initial post, and
hopefully the above info will shed a bit more light on my confusion.

Thank you all again for replying so quickly, and if you have any other
suggestions, please let me know.

Wes



On 7/6/06, Colin Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

So you need a divide and conquer strategy here:

1. Is it Asterisk or the WAN? This should be easy enough to test for. Do
call dropouts happen in your datacentre? If not, your Asterisk install is
good. My money's on the 10mbit WAN pipe, and that's what I would be
focussing on.

2. If it's the WAN, is it a connectivity issue or a bandwidth issue? Do a
continous ping from the remote location to your Asterisk server for a day.
You should get NO packets dropped. If you are getting drops, it's a
connectivity issue and you have to look at your SLA to see what your
provider considers good. Otherwise, bandwidth issue.

3. If it's a bandwidth issue, is it your users doing things or is it a
service that is eating bandwidth? If it's a service that is aggregated to a
remote server, like email, then you can use bandwidth management tools like
AstShape or good old tc to severely retard available bandwidth to the
troublesome service. If it's your users, you have to determine what they are
doing. Look at patterns: Does it happen every Tuesday afternoon when you
know Bob from Accounting is running his reports?

4. Sounds like you are running Asterisk -- SIP -- 10mbit WAN -- SIP --
Phones - which probably is half the issue right there because of no
jitterbuffer. Dig up an old P-3, stick in Trixbox, run it out to your remote
location, and have your Eyebeam clients use *it* instead of your big
Asterisk server for local connectivity. Then tie your P-3 to your big
Asterisk server with IAX. Jitterbuffer + trunking = goodness and your P-3
won't choke under load if you avoid transcoding by using the same codec
end-to-end. Yes it will blow having to maintain two dialplans. But IAX works
frigging great. I use it to aggregate 30 remote locations over the *public*
Internet to my big Asterisk server, and I never get complaints of dropouts,
and in fact I use it extensively myself and IMO it sounds better* than the
local CableCo's VoIP offering, which is a big POS.

5. Regardless of what it actually is, I would have some sort of traffic
shaper at both ends of the WAN pipe. Again, dig up a couple of old P-2 or
P-3's and stick in a bootable Monowall CD, change the default rules to allow
all traffic through, but create a traffic shaping ruleset to give priority
and bandwidth to 5060, 4569, 1-2 and dump everything else to a low
priority queue.

6. I'd run GSM anyway (even though you tried it) because it would eliminate
half your bandwidth consumption. Another variable eliminated.

hth

*By 'sounds better' I mean it sounds like a perfectly normal PSTN call, ALL
THE TIME in s d  of  co s an ly  s nd ng li e  t hs


-Original Message-
From: whois wes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 10:51 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Phones cutting out

RE: [asterisk-users] Phones cutting out.....again - PLEASE HELP!! !

2006-07-06 Thread Colin Anderson
Also, when I connect to the server locally (the server is in the room
next to me, in other words, and i have 1 Gbit of bandwidth all the way
to the back of the server, I still get call dropouts.  

However, this IS the only server (of 8 total, all in the same rack and
connected to the telco via the same DS3) that is having the issue,
which DOES point to it being the WAN, as that is our ONLY remote
location.

So perhaps what you are seeing is two or more subtle issues with the same
symptom, so subjectively it looks like the *same* issue. 

1. Definitely try the remote IAX box to rule out bandwidth starvation.
2. Definitely try the ping test to rule out connectivity.
3. You have to figure out what the problem is with your big Asterisk box.
There should be no reason why you are getting dropouts on the local LAN.
What is the output of zttest? Is it good? Does zttool indicate IRQ misses?
If it's OK, then your hardware - T1 setup is good, so you have ruled out
your Asterisk box. It is also a worthwhile excercise to rule out the onboard
ethernet card in the Dell. In fact, whenever I do a new box, I automatically
disable the onboard LAN and replace it with an add-in 3com or Intel. It is
also a worthwhile excercise to user setpci to change the latency of the
cards in the Dell so that your Zap boards can grab the bus as much as
possible. 
4. The thing that is common in all scenarios is the EyeBeam client itself.
Any soft phone is subject to the strengths and weaknesses of the audio
chipset in the PC, with issues to consider like latency, audio threshold
before it starts the TX, and duplex settings. Because troubleshooting these
variables is often as hard as troubleshooting an entire Asterisk install, I
would never run a soft-phone and expect people to use it productively. What
happens when you put in a real phone? If you don't have a hardphone, maybe
try something else like the Snom soft-phone. 

In the end, this is all about eliminating variables as much as possible, and
this will determine your decision matrix of things to try. The first
matrix will be the most difficult to implement because you have a whole wack
of stuff to eliminate, but they will get smaller and smaller as you
eliminate variables and eventually you will only have 2 or 3 variables to
test for, and then you are golden. 

OT: I find it useful to make painstaking notes or keep a spreadsheet of test
results when going through a troubleshooting process like this. Often,
referring back to the spreadsheet gives me valuable insight into a problem.
I read this book, and I got shivers down my spine because it's like these
guys got into my brain and stole (what I thought) was an original
problem-solving idea of mine:

http://www.transcendstrategy.com/html/index.php?module=htmlpagesfunc=displa
ypid=7

Every person that troubleshoots a complex system should read this book
(disclaimer: I just read it, I have nothing to do with these guys) 

good luck

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones cutting out.....again - PLEASE HELP!! !

2006-07-06 Thread whois wes

Colin,

Very good points, and you are right, I need to start tracking what has
been done.

A bit of history - this server was very unstable when running Digium
hardware - every day or two, it would kernel panic and lock up,
requiring a manual reboot.  The other servers had issues as well, and
ALL of the stability problems were solved when we moved to Sangoma
cards about 6 weeks ago...this problem started a few weeks after that
migration.

On point #3, you mention a few things - we have NEVER gotten zttest to
show 100% on ANY of our boxes, which is one reason we migrated from
Digium to Sangoma.  For a while, we did try running a third party NIC
in the box to help with the stability issues.  Once we moved to
Sangoma, we went back to the onboard, and when we started having audio
issues, we did try putting the third party NIC back in, to no avail.

In regards to eyebeam, the rest of our company is using it as well.
We're a call center, and our reps are actually more productive with
the softphone than with the hardphones (we've tried both).  The sister
division of our remote location is set up almost identically in terms
of dialplan, T1 config, desktop software package, softphone, etc, and
they have ZERO issues.  The two divisions are literally mirrors of one
another, and the only difference between the two is that one office is
remote.

We also have hardphones in use by the managers at the remote location,
and they also experience the issue.

I do see what you're saying, though, about it possibly being two
smaller issues...I hope it's not, though - that much harder to pin
down.

Thanks
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Phones cutting out.....again - PLEASE HELP!!!

2006-07-06 Thread broadbandvoice

Do you have tetheral network analyser installed on server, that can be a good start, look at the analyses of the graphs. Also try pinging the CPE's and see if there is any latency. Do you also have the abilty to check the upstreams signals?

-- Original message -- From: "whois wes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Hate to drag this one back up, butit's happening again.   Overview of architecture:   Dell poweredge 2850, running fedora core 4, asterisk 1.2.7.1, zaptel  1.2.5, and sangoma wanpipe 2.3.4 drivers. T1 interface card is the  sangoma a104d with onboard echo can.   Server is located in our data center and connected directly to our  cisco 6513 core switch, so we have almost zero latency. The office  having the issues is located several miles away and is connected via a  10Mbit fiber pipe, also low latency. Ping times between remote office  and here are well under 10ms.   T1's are robbed-bit, EM wink signalling --- (this may be cause, but  want your input).
  &
gt;  Server load is averaging around 20%, plenty of memory, disk space, and  bandwidth available. No QOS running on network. ulaw is the primary  codec. Server is stable, and there are no extraneous services  running, save mysql and httpd. Even running a processor intensive  query doesn't trigger the droputs, they happen randomly.   Phones are a mix of Eyebeam 1.5.5 and Eyebeam 1.10 3010n. Both types  of phones are experiencing cutting out of the signal, mainly in the Rx  stream, but occassional in the Tx stream as well. The cutting out was  NOT occurring last night, and the phone server is being rebooted  nightly. Nothing has changed AT ALL, and the problem has started  occurring again. If I don't do ANYTHING at all today, there is a 50%  chance that this will NOT occur tomorrow. In other words, SOMETHING  is causing our phones to drop out, but whatever changes I m
 ake se
em to  have no effect. The problem will start and stop seeminly at it's own  whim.   ---  Things I have tried:   1. changed from ulaw to gsm as primary codec - no change  2. disabled hardware echo can on A104D - no change  3. moved from asterisk 1.2.4 to 1.2.7.1, recompiled both several  times - no change  4. have played with gain settings a bit, doesn't seem to make much difference  ---   At this point, i am nearing the end of my rope - i have rebuilt this  machine three times now, and have recompiled the system at least a  dozen times. We have gone from Digium hardware to Sangoma harware and  back again. I have changed every conceivable setting on the phones to  no avail. The problem will randomly disappear, only to come back a few  days later. I can make a change, it seems to have an effect, then  we're back to the 
 same o
ld thing again.   I am in dire need of ANY help anyone can offer, this has been going on  in some form for almost three months.   Thanks for reading,   Wes  ___  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --   asterisk-users mailing list  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] Phones cutting out.....again - PLEASE HELP!!!

2006-07-06 Thread Isaac Xiao
Did you try set autofallthrough=no. We have the same problem when using
1.2.9.1 (we are using A104d with IBM x306). So we downgraded to 1.2.6
and set autofallthrough=no. The call drop problem seems fixing. But we
have IVR DTMF recognition and queue not assign call to static agents
(Local channel) problem if I don't reboot the server more than 2 days.
Now I am trying downgrade A104d F/W from v20 to v18 (don't know what is
new in v20 and v19) and Asterisk 1.2.6 to 1.2.4. BTW, we are using a lot
of group pickup, call transfer in queue, not sure if it is cause or not.

Isaac Xiao
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-19 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 21:06, Sean Garland wrote:
 So I have * box   shorewall/linux NAT firewall  internet -
 WRT54G with openwrt -  IP500

 I have 5060, 4569, and 1 through 2 forwarded to * box from
 internet.  I have tried everything I can think of on the wrt to get it to
 work but it appears, looking at tcpdump that my phone is trying to get to
 the * box (I can get one way audio with port mapping in the WRT) using the
 192.168.x.x address it has as its internal interface...  Is there a way to
 force the IP500 to use the public IP of the * box for RTP?  Then it should
 work...

I think you need to do that on the Asterisk side, in sip.conf, setting 
externip or externhost and externrefresh may be what you want.  Don't forget 
about localnet if you have SIP phones on the LAN too.

(info taken from the sample sip.conf in asterisk)

-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-18 Thread Sean Garland
So how do you get a Polycom phone to work with * over NAT?  I can't seem to get 
it to work.  If I forward ports, I can get one-way audio, but that’s it.  
Looking at a packet capture, it appears that my phone is trying to send data to 
the internal address of the * server, which is of course, not available from 
the private side of the NAT lan...  I have a polycom soundpoint IP 500.



Thanks
Sean






-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C F
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 1:54 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

I'm really not interested to look back, but IIRC, when using just one
Polycom phone behind NAT we didn't have any problems, but when using
more than one behind the same NAT that is when problems started,
qualify=somethingbutno seemed to help it a bit, but didn't eliminate
the problem.

On 4/16/06, Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Saturday 15 April 2006 22:37, C F wrote:
  That is until you run into problems, while they do work, I wouldn't
  say that Polycoms work EXEPTIONALLY well, Cisco, and SPA work *MUCH*
  better.

 Can you detail some problems?  Just about any off-the-shelf router seems to
 work with these.  There may be some cheap-ass broken routers you can get for
 $5 which will not work, but all of the brand-name stuff I've tried Just
 Works, which is why I say they work exceptionally well.

 -A.
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.1/313 - Release Date: 4/15/2006
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.3/317 - Release Date: 4/18/2006
 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-18 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 09:57, Sean Garland wrote:
 So how do you get a Polycom phone to work with * over NAT?  I can't seem to
 get it to work.  If I forward ports, I can get one-way audio, but that’s
 it.  Looking at a packet capture, it appears that my phone is trying to
 send data to the internal address of the * server, which is of course, not
 available from the private side of the NAT lan...  I have a polycom
 soundpoint IP 500.

You don't do anything to get it to work through NAT.

If your * box is behind NAT you need to screw around a little, but for 
situations like this:

* box --- [internet] --- [nat dsl router] --- IP501

all you do is set 'nat=yes' on the * box, in the IP501's peer setting.  That's 
it.  It even works with multiple IP501s behind the same NAT DSL router.

If you have a stupid NAT box that closes ports off too quickly or plays too 
many games with the packets you may need some additional configuration 
(shorter registration expirations, etc.) but just buy a decent NAT box... 
WRT54Gs work just fine in their default configuration, for example.

-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-18 Thread Sean Garland
So I have * box   shorewall/linux NAT firewall  internet - WRT54G 
with openwrt -  IP500

I have 5060, 4569, and 1 through 2 forwarded to * box from internet.  I 
have tried everything I can think of on the wrt to get it to work but it 
appears, looking at tcpdump that my phone is trying to get to the * box (I can 
get one way audio with port mapping in the WRT) using the 192.168.x.x address 
it has as its internal interface...  Is there a way to force the IP500 to use 
the public IP of the * box for RTP?  Then it should work...  

Thanks
Sean

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Kohlsmith
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 7:31 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

On Tuesday 18 April 2006 09:57, Sean Garland wrote:
 So how do you get a Polycom phone to work with * over NAT?  I can't seem to
 get it to work.  If I forward ports, I can get one-way audio, but that’s
 it.  Looking at a packet capture, it appears that my phone is trying to
 send data to the internal address of the * server, which is of course, not
 available from the private side of the NAT lan...  I have a polycom
 soundpoint IP 500.

You don't do anything to get it to work through NAT.

If your * box is behind NAT you need to screw around a little, but for 
situations like this:

* box --- [internet] --- [nat dsl router] --- IP501

all you do is set 'nat=yes' on the * box, in the IP501's peer setting.  That's 
it.  It even works with multiple IP501s behind the same NAT DSL router.

If you have a stupid NAT box that closes ports off too quickly or plays too 
many games with the packets you may need some additional configuration 
(shorter registration expirations, etc.) but just buy a decent NAT box... 
WRT54Gs work just fine in their default configuration, for example.

-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.3/317 - Release Date: 4/18/2006
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.3/317 - Release Date: 4/18/2006
 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-16 Thread Chris Mason (Lists)

jennyw wrote:
We've been reasonably happy with Polycom SoundPoint phones, but we 
only have them installed on the LAN. I've read that they have problems 
working across NAT. So ... I guess I have a few questions. First, is 
there a way to get Polycoms to work well over NAT? If not, then are 
there phones of comparable voice quality that do work well over NAT? 
Without costing a lot more?


It's not NAT that's the problem, it's the implementation of NAT that is 
the variable and causes the problems. I send Polycoms to our remote 
users and usually have no problems behind NAT, but one user had so much 
trouble we had to move the Polycom outside the firewall and use the 
passt hrough to connect the firewall. If you can proscribe a M0n0wall 
firewall box you can handle any NAT problems but if you are stuck using 
some funky $50 firewall/router, chances are you will have problems.


--
Chris Mason
NetConcepts



--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-16 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Saturday 15 April 2006 22:37, C F wrote:
 That is until you run into problems, while they do work, I wouldn't
 say that Polycoms work EXEPTIONALLY well, Cisco, and SPA work *MUCH*
 better.

Can you detail some problems?  Just about any off-the-shelf router seems to 
work with these.  There may be some cheap-ass broken routers you can get for 
$5 which will not work, but all of the brand-name stuff I've tried Just 
Works, which is why I say they work exceptionally well.

-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-16 Thread Bill Gibbs
What firewall was the problem user running?  We have Polycoms behind
Linux, Mikrotik, Linksys, Dlink, Netgear, etc all without any problems.

Bill

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Mason (Lists)
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 9:21 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

jennyw wrote:
 We've been reasonably happy with Polycom SoundPoint phones, but we 
 only have them installed on the LAN. I've read that they have problems

 working across NAT. So ... I guess I have a few questions. First, is 
 there a way to get Polycoms to work well over NAT? If not, then are 
 there phones of comparable voice quality that do work well over NAT? 
 Without costing a lot more?

It's not NAT that's the problem, it's the implementation of NAT that is 
the variable and causes the problems. I send Polycoms to our remote 
users and usually have no problems behind NAT, but one user had so much 
trouble we had to move the Polycom outside the firewall and use the 
passt hrough to connect the firewall. If you can proscribe a M0n0wall 
firewall box you can handle any NAT problems but if you are stuck using 
some funky $50 firewall/router, chances are you will have problems.

-- 
Chris Mason
NetConcepts



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-16 Thread C F
I'm really not interested to look back, but IIRC, when using just one
Polycom phone behind NAT we didn't have any problems, but when using
more than one behind the same NAT that is when problems started,
qualify=somethingbutno seemed to help it a bit, but didn't eliminate
the problem.

On 4/16/06, Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Saturday 15 April 2006 22:37, C F wrote:
  That is until you run into problems, while they do work, I wouldn't
  say that Polycoms work EXEPTIONALLY well, Cisco, and SPA work *MUCH*
  better.

 Can you detail some problems?  Just about any off-the-shelf router seems to
 work with these.  There may be some cheap-ass broken routers you can get for
 $5 which will not work, but all of the brand-name stuff I've tried Just
 Works, which is why I say they work exceptionally well.

 -A.
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-16 Thread Christian Stredicke
There are two approaches to get NAT working properly:

- Use UDP and send and receive from the same port. This is extremly
simple, however some phones do (by default) send and recieve from a
different ports. Then you have to tell explicity no no, dont do that;
use the same port. There are even phones that send and receive from
different RTP ports. I would say they are extremly NAT unfriendly. And I
don't know why a phone vendor would do that. Anyway, the IETF specs
allow it. The problem with the UDP approach is the high keep-alive
traffic (every 15-20 secs you must refresh it) and the number of buggy
NAT implementations out there. I would say this approach works with 95 %
of the equipment.

- Use TCP/TLS and keep the TCP connection to the PBX open all the time.
This reduces and amound of keep-alive traffic and works with almost
anything on the market. Because a router that does not support https or
MS Exchange traffic will have a real hard time in the market place! TLS
has the advantage that smart routers cannot see the SIP traffic any
more and mess around with it. For example, there is a vendor out there
that does not understand the rport parameter in the Via and removes it
(but leave the ; standing there)!!! Especially when there are relatively
few user agents registered to the system (number of file descriptors),
this approach is superior. AFAIK the next * version will support this
approach; there are already systems available that support TCP and TLS.

Just my two cents.


Christian

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Andrew Kohlsmith
 Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 11:16 PM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT
 
 On Saturday 15 April 2006 22:37, C F wrote:
  That is until you run into problems, while they do work, I wouldn't 
  say that Polycoms work EXEPTIONALLY well, Cisco, and SPA 
 work *MUCH* 
  better.
 
 Can you detail some problems?  Just about any off-the-shelf 
 router seems to work with these.  There may be some cheap-ass 
 broken routers you can get for
 $5 which will not work, but all of the brand-name stuff I've 
 tried Just Works, which is why I say they work exceptionally well.
 
 -A.
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-15 Thread jennyw

Hi, everyone,

We've been reasonably happy with Polycom SoundPoint phones, but we only 
have them installed on the LAN. I've read that they have problems 
working across NAT. So ... I guess I have a few questions. First, is 
there a way to get Polycoms to work well over NAT? If not, then are 
there phones of comparable voice quality that do work well over NAT? 
Without costing a lot more?


Thanks!

Jen

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-15 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Saturday 15 April 2006 21:12, jennyw wrote:
 We've been reasonably happy with Polycom SoundPoint phones, but we only
 have them installed on the LAN. I've read that they have problems
 working across NAT. So ... I guess I have a few questions. First, is
 there a way to get Polycoms to work well over NAT? If not, then are
 there phones of comparable voice quality that do work well over NAT?
 Without costing a lot more?

Polycoms (the IP501s at any rate) work EXCEPTIONALLY well through NAT.  It's 
as literally dead-simple as plug-and-go.  No configuration on the phone, and 
all you want is a nat=yes in their sip.conf entry.  That's it.  Seriously.

Olle's Symmetric RTP code is what makes it work so well.  I have two IP501s 
behind a factory-default WRT54G on regular consumer ADSL hitting an Asterisk 
box on a real IP.  The WRT54 has no configuration to reflect port-forwards 
and the only thing Asterisk has is nat=yes for those two extensions.  

It Just Works. And I'm still stunned by it.  :-)

Olle...  Thank you once again for the symmetric RTP code in Asterisk.  It's a 
godsend.

-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-15 Thread C F
On 4/15/06, Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Saturday 15 April 2006 21:12, jennyw wrote:
  We've been reasonably happy with Polycom SoundPoint phones, but we only
  have them installed on the LAN. I've read that they have problems
  working across NAT. So ... I guess I have a few questions. First, is
  there a way to get Polycoms to work well over NAT? If not, then are
  there phones of comparable voice quality that do work well over NAT?
  Without costing a lot more?

 Polycoms (the IP501s at any rate) work EXCEPTIONALLY well through NAT.  It's
 as literally dead-simple as plug-and-go.  No configuration on the phone, and
 all you want is a nat=yes in their sip.conf entry.  That's it.  Seriously.

That is until you run into problems, while they do work, I wouldn't
say that Polycoms work EXEPTIONALLY well, Cisco, and SPA work *MUCH*
better.


 Olle's Symmetric RTP code is what makes it work so well.  I have two IP501s
 behind a factory-default WRT54G on regular consumer ADSL hitting an Asterisk
 box on a real IP.  The WRT54 has no configuration to reflect port-forwards
 and the only thing Asterisk has is nat=yes for those two extensions.

 It Just Works. And I'm still stunned by it.  :-)

 Olle...  Thank you once again for the symmetric RTP code in Asterisk.  It's a
 godsend.

 -A.
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones that work well through NAT

2006-04-15 Thread Ron Senykoff
  Polycoms (the IP501s at any rate) work EXCEPTIONALLY well through NAT.  It's
  as literally dead-simple as plug-and-go.  No configuration on the phone, and
  all you want is a nat=yes in their sip.conf entry.  That's it.  Seriously.

In addition to nat=yes, I recommend adding qualify=yes for all phones
behind NAT. Otherwise the router doing NAT may flush out the port
mappings relative to your phone. The qualify essentially sends a
keep-alive. We have Polycom IP500s and 501s and this works very well
for them (one sitting right here on my desk).

-Ron
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Phones are all auto answering

2006-04-06 Thread Christian Buchter


Kind of like DND, but some phones seem ok.  They all give the message
even if it rings through that the person is on the phone even if they
are not. Normally it says that when they are on the phone, and it says
unavailable if they are not on the phone but never answer...

Almost like astericks thinks all the phones are busy, at least by the
recording it gives. 

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C F
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 10:51 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones are all auto answering

What phones you using?

On 4/4/06, Christian Buchter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Strange, but all the phones when called immediately return a user is 
 on the phone and the phone never rings.

 Anyone else ever experience this before?

 TIA


 _
 This email has been scanned by MessageLabs on behalf of E-INS 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_
This email has been scanned by MessageLabs on behalf of E-INS


_
This email has been scanned by MessageLabs on behalf of E-INS
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones are all auto answering

2006-04-05 Thread Pete Barnwell
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 10:44 -0400, Christian Buchter wrote:
 
 Strange, but all the phones when called immediately return a user is on
 the phone and the phone never rings.
 
 Anyone else ever experience this before?
 
 TIA

Have the users managed to set DND on the phones? That would give the
exact symptom.

Rgds

Pete

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Phones are all auto answering

2006-04-05 Thread Christian Buchter

Snom 190s and 220s, it seems to happen intermittently but not sure why

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C F
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 10:51 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones are all auto answering

What phones you using?

On 4/4/06, Christian Buchter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Strange, but all the phones when called immediately return a user is 
 on the phone and the phone never rings.

 Anyone else ever experience this before?

 TIA


 _
 This email has been scanned by MessageLabs on behalf of E-INS 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

_
This email has been scanned by MessageLabs on behalf of E-INS


_
This email has been scanned by MessageLabs on behalf of E-INS
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones are all auto answering

2006-04-05 Thread C F
What phones you using?

On 4/4/06, Christian Buchter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Strange, but all the phones when called immediately return a user is on
 the phone and the phone never rings.

 Anyone else ever experience this before?

 TIA


 _
 This email has been scanned by MessageLabs on behalf of E-INS
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Phones are all auto answering

2006-04-05 Thread Christian Buchter


Strange, but all the phones when called immediately return a user is on
the phone and the phone never rings.

Anyone else ever experience this before?

TIA


_
This email has been scanned by MessageLabs on behalf of E-INS
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-22 Thread Charles Marcus

C F wrote:

Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT.


Do you mean in general? Or only if you are trying to interconnect 
multiple offices?


Are Polycoms fine for just one office, if the entire office is behind a 
NAT device, and the phones are only being used for normal calling?


Thanks,

--

Charles
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-22 Thread Marco Mouta
Are you using which version of Asterisk?? Did you check if you are
facing the old audio bug on bridge calls that appeared ?

http://asteriskvoip.blogspot.com/2006_01_01_asteriskvoip_archive.html

Wednesday, January 25, 2006
Update: No audio - Update your Asterisk

This morning we discovered a serious bug that stopped all bridged
audio in our Asterisk servers. Mark found the problem and soon fixed
it.

If you get this problem today, please update your Asterisk server. A
fix has been commited to the subversion repository for 1.2 as well as
trunk.

A fixed 1.2.3 release will be published on ftp.digium.com as soon as
we can find a release engineer (consider the time zone problem).

A big thank you to everyone in the IRC channel that helped us locate
this issue and to Mark that fixed it so quickly.
---

I hope it helps.

Best regards,
Marco Mouta

On 3/22/06, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 C F wrote:
  Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT.

 Do you mean in general? Or only if you are trying to interconnect
 multiple offices?

 Are Polycoms fine for just one office, if the entire office is behind a
 NAT device, and the phones are only being used for normal calling?

 Thanks,

 --

 Charles
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there isnoaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-22 Thread Gabriel Afana
The reason I say they are not the best is because they have no ability to 
connect to a STUN server and they have no keep-alive mechanism for NAT.


At VON, I was talking to a company called Ranch Networks who said they have 
a device that will solve NAT traversal issues with Asterisk and its phones. 
Here is a link to their product:

http://www.ranchnetworks.com/pdfs/RN40_41_brief.pdf

I am talking to them now to see exactly what this thing does.

- Gabe


- Original Message - 
From: Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there 
isnoaudiowhen calling between extensions




C F wrote:

Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT.


Do you mean in general? Or only if you are trying to interconnect multiple 
offices?


Are Polycoms fine for just one office, if the entire office is behind a 
NAT device, and the phones are only being used for normal calling?


Thanks,

--

Charles
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is no audiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-21 Thread Martin Joseph


On Mar 20, 2006, at 4:39 PM, Gabriel Afana wrote:


I just did a little RTP debug and this is what it shows:

  == Spawn extension (304, 301, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/304-d9f8'
-- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 216.152.244.81:

requested format = ulaw,
requested prefs = (),
actual format = ulaw,
host prefs = (),
priority = mine

-- Executing Dial(IAX2/to_80-1, SIP/301) in new stack
-- Called 301
-- SIP/301-1fec is ringing
-- SIP/301-1fec answered IAX2/to_80-1
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16810, ts 
344311448, len

160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16811, ts 
344311608, len

160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16812, ts 
344311768, len

160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16813, ts 
344311928, len

160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16814, ts 
344312088, len

160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16815, ts 
344312248, len

160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16816, ts 
344312408, len

160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16817, ts 
344312568, len

160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16818, ts 
344312728, len

160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16819, ts 
344312888, len

160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16820, ts 
344313048, len

160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16821, ts 
344313208, len

160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16822, ts 
344313368, len

160)
..


that goes on for ever while the call is in progress.  This is a call 
between
phones that go between two * servers.  If I make a call between phones 
both

registered to the same asterisk server, this is my RTP stream:

-- Executing Dial(SIP/304-c211, SIP/301|30|r) in new stack
-- Called 301
-- SIP/301-b2c8 is ringing
-- SIP/301-b2c8 answered SIP/304-c211
-- Attempting native bridge of SIP/304-c211 and SIP/301-b2c8
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 39729, ts 
-1972065425,

len 160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 24819, ts 0, len 160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 39730, ts 
-1972065265,

len 160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 24820, ts 160, len 
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 39731, ts 
-1972065105,

len 160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 24821, ts 320, len 
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 39732, ts 
-1972064945,

len 160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 24822, ts 480, len 
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46694, ts 
1105329892, len

160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42690, ts 0, len 160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46695, ts 
1105330052, len

160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42691, ts 160, len 
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46696, ts 
1105330212, len

160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42692, ts 320, len 
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46697, ts 
1105330372, len

160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42693, ts 480, len 
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46698, ts 
1105330532, len

160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42694, ts 640, len 
160)

[THE END]

Once I anser the call, the RTP string starts and then stops right 
where I

put [THE END].



Did you try setting reinvite to no?  Seems the native bridge is what's 
failing.  Rethink your routing with regards native bridging (ie 
everybody is able to get through there nats and be identified?


I don't really know,  I am only trying to be helpful.  Hope it's worth 
something.


Marty

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-21 Thread Gabriel Afana
Thanks for the response.

Yes, canreinvite is set to no on all lines.

After some testing, I was able to get sound between phones when they were
both registered to the same server.  Maybe the IAX trunk is messing
something up.  strange because it was working perfect last week and nothing
changed!

- Gabe



 Did you try setting reinvite to no?  Seems the native bridge is what's
 failing.  Rethink your routing with regards native bridging (ie
 everybody is able to get through there nats and be identified?

 I don't really know,  I am only trying to be helpful.  Hope it's worth
 something.

 Marty

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-21 Thread C F
Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT.

On 3/21/06, Gabriel Afana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks for the response.

 Yes, canreinvite is set to no on all lines.

 After some testing, I was able to get sound between phones when they were
 both registered to the same server.  Maybe the IAX trunk is messing
 something up.  strange because it was working perfect last week and nothing
 changed!

 - Gabe


 
  Did you try setting reinvite to no?  Seems the native bridge is what's
  failing.  Rethink your routing with regards native bridging (ie
  everybody is able to get through there nats and be identified?
 
  I don't really know,  I am only trying to be helpful.  Hope it's worth
  something.
 
  Marty
 
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-21 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 10:55, C F wrote:
 Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT.

Are you kidding me?  I used to think that anything SIP was a pain behind NAT 
until I turned on 'nat=yes' for the peer/user/friend entry in sip.conf and 
told the IP501 to register to the Asterisk box.  (All defaults too, no 
special hyper-fast register interval or goofy Polycom configuration at all.) 

And even after that I wouldn't believe it until I had three of them behind a 
plain-jane WRT54G on standard Telco dynamic IP ADSL talking to my Asterisk 
box connected through third-party ADSL.  Calls go out, calls come in, it's as 
if they're on the same LAN.

Seriously: It Just Works.  I keep popping into #asterisk-dev and thanking OEJ.  
I'm still not a huge fan of SIP but I have had *no* issues with Polycom 
IP501s behind NAT talking to an Asterisk box on a real IP.

-A.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-21 Thread C F
I didn't say it doens't work, I said it's not the best, and if you
want I'll repeat myslef, Polycoms are not the best behind NAT, Cisco,
or SPAs are much better. Just because you didn't run into any problems
doesn't mean that it works well with all NAT devices.

On 3/21/06, Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tuesday 21 March 2006 10:55, C F wrote:
  Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT.

 Are you kidding me?  I used to think that anything SIP was a pain behind NAT
 until I turned on 'nat=yes' for the peer/user/friend entry in sip.conf and
 told the IP501 to register to the Asterisk box.  (All defaults too, no
 special hyper-fast register interval or goofy Polycom configuration at all.)

 And even after that I wouldn't believe it until I had three of them behind a
 plain-jane WRT54G on standard Telco dynamic IP ADSL talking to my Asterisk
 box connected through third-party ADSL.  Calls go out, calls come in, it's as
 if they're on the same LAN.

 Seriously: It Just Works.  I keep popping into #asterisk-dev and thanking OEJ.
 I'm still not a huge fan of SIP but I have had *no* issues with Polycom
 IP501s behind NAT talking to an Asterisk box on a real IP.

 -A.
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-21 Thread Rich Adamson

Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:

On Tuesday 21 March 2006 10:55, C F wrote:

Polycoms are not the best if you want a phone that works behind NAT.


Are you kidding me?  I used to think that anything SIP was a pain behind NAT 
until I turned on 'nat=yes' for the peer/user/friend entry in sip.conf and 
told the IP501 to register to the Asterisk box.  (All defaults too, no 
special hyper-fast register interval or goofy Polycom configuration at all.) 

And even after that I wouldn't believe it until I had three of them behind a 
plain-jane WRT54G on standard Telco dynamic IP ADSL talking to my Asterisk 
box connected through third-party ADSL.  Calls go out, calls come in, it's as 
if they're on the same LAN.


Seriously: It Just Works.  I keep popping into #asterisk-dev and thanking OEJ.  
I'm still not a huge fan of SIP but I have had *no* issues with Polycom 
IP501s behind NAT talking to an Asterisk box on a real IP.


Same here with IP600; they just work. :)

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is no audio when calling between extensions

2006-03-20 Thread Gabriel Afana
Hey group,
I have a Polycom 501 and a 301 together in my office.  Each phone is
registered to a different server.  When I call one of the phones from the
other, the other phone rings no problem (the calls are passed between
servers via IAX).  However, when I answer it, there is absolutely no audio
in either direction.  This just started happening today.

It was working great before - I just plugged them in, got them
registered and I was calling between phones no problem.  Now I dont know
what is happening and I cannot figure it out.  It seems like a NAT issue,
but I have qualify=yes, nat=yes and insecure=port,invite.

- Gabe

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is no audiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-20 Thread Gabriel Afana
I just did a little RTP debug and this is what it shows:

  == Spawn extension (304, 301, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/304-d9f8'
-- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 216.152.244.81:
requested format = ulaw,
requested prefs = (),
actual format = ulaw,
host prefs = (),
priority = mine
-- Executing Dial(IAX2/to_80-1, SIP/301) in new stack
-- Called 301
-- SIP/301-1fec is ringing
-- SIP/301-1fec answered IAX2/to_80-1
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16810, ts 344311448, len
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16811, ts 344311608, len
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16812, ts 344311768, len
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16813, ts 344311928, len
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16814, ts 344312088, len
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16815, ts 344312248, len
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16816, ts 344312408, len
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16817, ts 344312568, len
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16818, ts 344312728, len
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16819, ts 344312888, len
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16820, ts 344313048, len
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16821, ts 344313208, len
160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16822, ts 344313368, len
160)
..


that goes on for ever while the call is in progress.  This is a call between
phones that go between two * servers.  If I make a call between phones both
registered to the same asterisk server, this is my RTP stream:

-- Executing Dial(SIP/304-c211, SIP/301|30|r) in new stack
-- Called 301
-- SIP/301-b2c8 is ringing
-- SIP/301-b2c8 answered SIP/304-c211
-- Attempting native bridge of SIP/304-c211 and SIP/301-b2c8
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 39729, ts -1972065425,
len 160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 24819, ts 0, len 160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 39730, ts -1972065265,
len 160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 24820, ts 160, len 160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 39731, ts -1972065105,
len 160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 24821, ts 320, len 160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 39732, ts -1972064945,
len 160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 24822, ts 480, len 160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46694, ts 1105329892, len
160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42690, ts 0, len 160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46695, ts 1105330052, len
160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42691, ts 160, len 160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46696, ts 1105330212, len
160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42692, ts 320, len 160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46697, ts 1105330372, len
160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42693, ts 480, len 160)
Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46698, ts 1105330532, len
160)
Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42694, ts 640, len 160)
[THE END]

Once I anser the call, the RTP string starts and then stops right where I
put [THE END].

- Gabe








 Hey group,
 I have a Polycom 501 and a 301 together in my office.  Each phone is
 registered to a different server.  When I call one of the phones from the
 other, the other phone rings no problem (the calls are passed between
 servers via IAX).  However, when I answer it, there is absolutely no audio
 in either direction.  This just started happening today.

 It was working great before - I just plugged them in, got them
 registered and I was calling between phones no problem.  Now I dont know
 what is happening and I cannot figure it out.  It seems like a NAT issue,
 but I have qualify=yes, nat=yes and insecure=port,invite.

 - Gabe

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is noaudiowhen calling between extensions

2006-03-20 Thread Gabriel Afana
This is driving me nuts!!

After unplugging all the phones, restarting the router and the modem, and
reconfigurating my * boxes, I was finally able to communicate between both
phones only when they were both registered to the same server.

If I try to call between phones between two different servers trunked with
IAX, there is no sound (but the call rings and connects perfectly).  This
was working last week *no problem*, all of a sudden its dead!!!

Its killing me because it *was* working and now its not and I cannot figure
out.

- Gabe

- Original Message - 
From: Gabriel Afana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones were working fine - Now there is
noaudiowhen calling between extensions


 I just did a little RTP debug and this is what it shows:

   == Spawn extension (304, 301, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/304-d9f8'
 -- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 216.152.244.81:
 requested format = ulaw,
 requested prefs = (),
 actual format = ulaw,
 host prefs = (),
 priority = mine
 -- Executing Dial(IAX2/to_80-1, SIP/301) in new stack
 -- Called 301
 -- SIP/301-1fec is ringing
 -- SIP/301-1fec answered IAX2/to_80-1
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16810, ts 344311448,
len
 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16811, ts 344311608,
len
 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16812, ts 344311768,
len
 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16813, ts 344311928,
len
 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16814, ts 344312088,
len
 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16815, ts 344312248,
len
 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16816, ts 344312408,
len
 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16817, ts 344312568,
len
 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16818, ts 344312728,
len
 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16819, ts 344312888,
len
 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16820, ts 344313048,
len
 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16821, ts 344313208,
len
 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2228 (type 0, seq 16822, ts 344313368,
len
 160)
 ..


 that goes on for ever while the call is in progress.  This is a call
between
 phones that go between two * servers.  If I make a call between phones
both
 registered to the same asterisk server, this is my RTP stream:

 -- Executing Dial(SIP/304-c211, SIP/301|30|r) in new stack
 -- Called 301
 -- SIP/301-b2c8 is ringing
 -- SIP/301-b2c8 answered SIP/304-c211
 -- Attempting native bridge of SIP/304-c211 and SIP/301-b2c8
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 39729, ts -1972065425,
 len 160)
 Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 24819, ts 0, len 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 39730, ts -1972065265,
 len 160)
 Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 24820, ts 160, len 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 39731, ts -1972065105,
 len 160)
 Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 24821, ts 320, len 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 39732, ts -1972064945,
 len 160)
 Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 24822, ts 480, len 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46694, ts 1105329892,
len
 160)
 Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42690, ts 0, len 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46695, ts 1105330052,
len
 160)
 Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42691, ts 160, len 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46696, ts 1105330212,
len
 160)
 Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42692, ts 320, len 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46697, ts 1105330372,
len
 160)
 Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42693, ts 480, len 160)
 Got RTP packet from 24.50.66.128:2232 (type 0, seq 46698, ts 1105330532,
len
 160)
 Sent RTP packet to 24.50.66.128:2234 (type 0, seq 42694, ts 640, len 160)
 [THE END]

 Once I anser the call, the RTP string starts and then stops right where I
 put [THE END].

 - Gabe








  Hey group,
  I have a Polycom 501 and a 301 together in my office.  Each phone is
  registered to a different server.  When I call one of the phones from
the
  other, the other phone rings no problem (the calls are passed between
  servers via IAX).  However, when I answer it, there is absolutely no
audio
  in either direction.  This just started happening today.
 
  It was working great before - I just plugged them in, got them
  registered and I was calling between phones no problem.  Now I dont know
  what is happening and I cannot figure

[Asterisk-Users] Phones

2006-01-13 Thread joe
Title:  Phones







Greetings,

Has anyone had any success utilizing Asterisk with Digium or other cards to allow plugging/utilizing Partner/Lucent Phones? These are the phones that usually come with the Partner ACS PBX system? (Partner 8,16,24 phones, I think they are proprietary).

Also is there any add on programs/plug-in for Asterisk that can be used as a 'call back' from a pool of numbers with an associated wave, mp3 or other recorded file? (Note I am referring to a 'War' Dialing type scenario it is so I can remind people of their appointments. This is not cold calling, nor would it be utilizing predictive dialing at least I do not think so on the predictive dialing part anyway).

Thanks in advance.

Je





___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Phones

2006-01-11 Thread joe
Greetings,

Has anyone had any success with Asterisk and Digium or other cards to allow 
plugging/utilizing Partner/Lucent Phones? These are the phones that usually 
come with the Partner ACS PBX system? (Partner 8,16,24 phones, I do not know if 
they are analog or digital but do think they are proprietary).

Also is there any add on programs/plug-in for Asterisk that can be used as a 
'call back' from a pool of numbers with an associated wave, mp3 or other 
recorded file? (Note I am referring to a 'War' Dialing type scenario and nope 
it is so I can remind people of their appointments. This is not cold calling, 
nor would it be utilizing predictive dialing at least I do not think so on the 
predictive dialing part anyway).

Thanks in advance.

Je
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Phones no longer register - except one?

2005-11-10 Thread Mark Benson

Hi I've got an interesting problem.

A few days ago (maybe even a week or two) all my sip phones lost 
registrations with my asterisk box. All that is but one.


The asterisk box is out on the internet, I have two phones at my 
location and 1 at another separate location.


The only phone that remains registered is an Integrated Networks IN002 
(or something like that). This is at my location.


I also have a grandstream GXP-2000 that will not register. This is also 
at my location.


I have tried xlite and sjphone (on my desktop and mobile phone (via 
wireless)  respectivley) to test, These also fail to register.


I have a Budgetone 102 at another location which also fails to register.

There is nothing on the command line apart from the IN002 phone 
registering and talking to the * server. It dials in and out fine.


The only thing I can see that mine and the remote location have in 
common is the ISP that provides DSL (plusnet), and I was wondering if 
they were limiting traffic as they have recently announced their own 
telephony service. But I doubt it and if that was the case then why does 
the IN002 register and not the budget tone? Its a crazy paranoid theory, 
but I can't think of anything else.


The * is 1.0.9 and was working perfectly when I upgraded from a CVS version.

Any ideas - I must be missing something obvious - but I've not changed 
anything since the upgrade. Any why one phone?


Mark

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones Callwaiting enable by default?

2005-04-01 Thread Matt
I'm using Sipura SPA-841 and SPA-2000 phones and ATAs... Yes.. it's a
good assumption that I'm using asterisk, since I posted to this
list Umm *70 is there to turn call waiting on/off in the asterisk
database.

On Mar 31, 2005 7:57 PM, C F [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What phones? are you using Avaya, or Toshiba? Since you are posting to
 this list I will guess you are using Asterisk, in which case I have no
 clue why *70 is there in the first place. Did you notice that the guy
 that went to the Doctor that his eye hurts when drinking coffee,
 refused to remove the spoon from the cup?
 
 
 On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:03:12 -0500, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi,
  how can I get all the phones to enable call waiting by default instead
  of having to dial *70 on each one to activate call waiting?
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Phones Callwaiting enable by default?

2005-03-31 Thread Matt
Hi,
how can I get all the phones to enable call waiting by default instead
of having to dial *70 on each one to activate call waiting?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones Callwaiting enable by default?

2005-03-31 Thread C F
What phones? are you using Avaya, or Toshiba? Since you are posting to
this list I will guess you are using Asterisk, in which case I have no
clue why *70 is there in the first place. Did you notice that the guy
that went to the Doctor that his eye hurts when drinking coffee,
refused to remove the spoon from the cup?


On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:03:12 -0500, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 how can I get all the phones to enable call waiting by default instead
 of having to dial *70 on each one to activate call waiting?
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Phones for vitural office business

2005-02-20 Thread dkwok
I am looking for IP phones that are suited to serviced office operation.
The business is to answer calls for customers. The incoming lines are E1
and customers are allocated with DID. So the customers' phone can be
answered with the customers' designed messages and instruction. This can
be done easily with key phone system. It seems to be a problem for IP
phone system. I read previous discussions on the pros and cons of key
system and ip phone system. However, still need to offer an solution to
the operation
whereby when calls come in, the operators will be able to identify whose
customer's call and answer for that customer accordingly.
I have a look at Snom 220 with console. Does the line appearance
function solve this problem if DID is assigned to difference line of the
ip phone?
Any suggestion will be welcome.
David Kwok
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phones for vitural office business

2005-02-20 Thread Adam Goryachev
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 13:25 +1100, dkwok wrote:
 I am looking for IP phones that are suited to serviced office operation.
 
 The business is to answer calls for customers. The incoming lines are E1
 and customers are allocated with DID. So the customers' phone can be
 answered with the customers' designed messages and instruction. This can
 be done easily with key phone system. It seems to be a problem for IP
 phone system. I read previous discussions on the pros and cons of key
 system and ip phone system. However, still need to offer an solution to
 the operation
 whereby when calls come in, the operators will be able to identify whose
 customer's call and answer for that customer accordingly.

IMHO, any phone with some lights/buttons on it will not be helpful,
unless you will only ever have less than X different customers/DID's.
IMHO, you need some sort of simple PC based app, and, if you think about
it, you could do a lot more than any other key system.

eg, When the call arrives, lookup the DID in the database, and retrieve
the call script/announcement, then send that data to your client
application along with the CND, and ring the phone.

You know now what to say, and who is calling before you even answer the
phone.

Extra points if you also include some work to see that this person has
called previously and left three messages in the last 20 minutes. (even
if the calls are being answered by different people, you could still let
them know that the previous messages have been sent, etc...

If you would like someone to write this solution, contact me off-list,
or see the wiki for asterisk consultants...

Regards,
Adam

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] phones with two ethernet ports

2005-01-04 Thread Dave Cotton
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 14:34 -0700, Harry McGregor wrote:

 Try finding a VOIP Phone that does gigabit... Won't happen for a while.
 Cable is cheap when you look at the cost of running the cable.  If you
 use two boxes, it will take virtually the same amount of time to run two
 as it does to run one.

I ordered some special siamese cat5e cable to overcome this, the
electrician told to pull the cables and left on his own, promptly
spent all his time pulling them apart and running _one_ to each end
point! You can't get the staff these days.
 
-- 
Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >