[asterisk-users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-05 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 00:31:36 -0400,
  M.Hockings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Yup that looks like it is in our future now.  I had thought it was a 
 misconfiguration of the UPS software on the new machine but apparently 
 not.  The battery has died in the UPS.  With two machines and displays 
 it could run them for almost an hour and I have it set to run for 10 
 minutes then start shutdown then power down the ups 5 min later.

If you are using 'nut' (Network UPS Tools) you should be able to have your
system monitor the UPS. So that you shutdown on low battery rather than
after a fixed period of time. Also on some UPS's they will report if the
battery needs to be replaced and I believe nut can notify you of that
condition. (Though there may be a visual indication on the UPS as well.)
Some UPS's will even let you hotswap batteries.

If you want to go this route, you probably want to check for how well the
UPS is supported by nut. I recently bought a UPS. I went with an MGE Systems
Nova 1100 because I wanted a line interactive UPS to get protection against
out of spec voltages but didn't want to pay for the better units that provide
truer sign wave output and have more flexible control options and because they
are supporting the nut project and provide documentation on the protocols
their UPS use (unlike, say Belkin). However, the Nova is only properly
supported in the development version of nut, so you need to be willing to
get that version if you want to use it. The Nova is a fairly new model and I
expect that is why the support in the latest released version of nut is broken.
I would expect support for older UPS's to be better in the latest release.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-04 Thread M.Hockings

Tigran Kocharyan wrote:

Mike,
If you feel afraid of the next power outage, why not install a more 
powerfull UPS with a longer run time? Or, as it is in my case, a friend 
of mine substituted the factory default battery in the UPS with a car 
battery, that holds the Server for 4-5 hours. Add another battery and it 
will hold 8-9 hours.

Really funny but it works.

Regards,
Tigran



You know what Tigran, I have been considering exactly that.  The UPS 
that I am using has two 12v batteries in it in series.  The batteries 
don't seem to be holding a charge any longer (which was the start of my 
woes). They are readily available in the US for about $15 each but seem 
to be unavailable in Canada.  So my plan is to get another UPS for now 
and work out a better battery solution for the first one as it is a nice 
UPS with AVR and all that stuff.  Thanks for the confirmation that this 
type of solution would work.


Mike

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-04 Thread scott
Thanks for your email,

I am currently on annual leave and will return on the 19th July.

Many Thanks
Scott Pinhorne
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-04 Thread scott
Thanks for your email,

I am currently on annual leave and will return on the 19th July.

Many Thanks
Scott Pinhorne
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-04 Thread scott
Thanks for your email,

I am currently on annual leave and will return on the 19th July.

Many Thanks
Scott Pinhorne
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-04 Thread scott
Thanks for your email,

I am currently on annual leave and will return on the 19th July.

Many Thanks
Scott Pinhorne
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-04 Thread scott
Thanks for your email,

I am currently on annual leave and will return on the 19th July.

Many Thanks
Scott Pinhorne
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-03 Thread Tigran Kocharyan

Mike,
If you feel afraid of the next power outage, why not install a more 
powerfull UPS with a longer run time? Or, as it is in my case, a friend 
of mine substituted the factory default battery in the UPS with a car 
battery, that holds the Server for 4-5 hours. Add another battery and it 
will hold 8-9 hours.

Really funny but it works.

Regards,
Tigran

M.Hockings wrote:


Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:


On Thursday 29 June 2006 21:38, M.Hockings wrote:


How reliable is Digium hardware in general.?  My new TDM400P just died.



I have a number of Digium T1 products (T100P, TE410P, TE405P and 
TE406P) as well as a few TDM400 based boards.  No failures in the 
last 2 years or so.



So, at over 2x the cost is Sangoma hardware more sturdy than the Digium
stuff?



Not that I've seen.  I also have a number of Sangoma products.  Both 
work very well for me.  As an engineer, I can also see that the 
protection on the interfaces is comparable.



Mike (totally UNimpressed with Digium)



I don't think this is a Digium problem, at least not yet.  What did 
their customer service people say?  Can you ask for a failure 
report?  You note that power went out.  Generally when this occurs 
there is a very high chance of transient voltage spiking or line 
swells not only on the residential electrical power grid but also on 
the telephone network.  Do you have any telco line protection in 
place to protect the card from nasties coming in from the outside?  
Is the protection correctly installed?  How about electrical 
protection?  The MOVs in your power strip and UPS are only good for a 
few hits before they become ineffective (something they never tell you).


Unless you know something more than you've presented here it is a 
little premature to start pointing fingers.


-A.



Point taken.  I was not so much point fingers but asking what my 
expectation should be and maybe shedding some frustration.  I don't 
really have a lot of experience with this kind of communications gear 
and it could very well be that one should keep spare daughter boards 
in stock.


I was finally able to get the thing going again but I do not know what 
I did to accomplish that.  I had tried the card in different PCI 
slots, reseated the daughter cards, powered the machine with and 
without the card, checked BIOS settings then after half a day of 
fiddling it just started responding again.  Who knows what the problem 
was?


As far as heat and stuff go, the card is in the only card in a new 
IBM/Lenovo box and has plenty of air on all sides.  The box itself is 
powered by an AVR type UPS, which according to the graphs it shows is 
keeping the power pretty stable even though dips.


One weakness is the incoming PSTN line, what is the best way to 
protect that beyond the device at the premises entry ?


So now it appears to be working again, don't know what failed, don't 
know what made it work. and afraid of the next power outage at this 
rural SOHO.


Mike

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-02 Thread Raymond McKay


Also as Bruno suggests I'll pick a new UPS that has the phone line 
protection as well, though are phone lines are underground to the local 
station even though we are in a rural location.  Cheaper than hanging it 
on poles I guess.




A little tidbit of trivia here I've found the underground lines in some 
rural areas were a somewhat expensive experiment tried by some telcos.  In 
some rural places in SC it was tried because the strong thunderstorms in the 
area tended to frequent damage above ground lines.  The thought  was putting 
them underground, while a bit more costly, might save some money in the long 
run.  So in certain sections they tried running underground.  As a result, 
those areas of the state usually now can't get things like DSL because it 
costs them too much to repull the grade of line to support it.  That is 
until they suffer water damage such as in places like Mississippi after the 
last hurricanes.


But I digress...


Raymond McKay
President
RAYNET Technologies LLC
http://www.raynettech.com
(860) 693-2226 x 31
Toll Free (877) 693-2226 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-02 Thread El Flynn

M.Hockings wrote:


Even now, given that I don't know what caused the problem or what solved 
the problem (for the time being). I might expect that powering the 
system off may cause software errors due to partially written files but 
I would NOT expect it to damage the hardware, particularly just a comm 
card.  Hence *my* feeling for *this* card is that it is unreliable.  It 
is however reassuring to hear that overall the reliability of the Digium 
hardware is good.




When you say the card just worked after it apparently went dead, did you 
switch it around to a different PCI slot? Or did you leave it in the same place, 
and after some time it worked again?


Flynn


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-02 Thread M.Hockings

El Flynn wrote:

M.Hockings wrote:


Even now, given that I don't know what caused the problem or what 
solved the problem (for the time being). I might expect that powering 
the system off may cause software errors due to partially written 
files but I would NOT expect it to damage the hardware, particularly 
just a comm card.  Hence *my* feeling for *this* card is that it is 
unreliable.  It is however reassuring to hear that overall the 
reliability of the Digium hardware is good.




When you say the card just worked after it apparently went dead, did 
you switch it around to a different PCI slot? Or did you leave it in the 
same place, and after some time it worked again?


Flynn


I had it in a different slot, out of the machine entirely, in a 
different slot again then finally back in the original slot.  And that 
is where it is working now.


This was a new Digium card in a new IBM (Lenovo) machine.

Mike

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-02 Thread M.Hockings

Raymond McKay wrote:


Also as Bruno suggests I'll pick a new UPS that has the phone line 
protection as well, though are phone lines are underground to the 
local station even though we are in a rural location.  Cheaper than 
hanging it on poles I guess.




A little tidbit of trivia here I've found the underground lines in 
some rural areas were a somewhat expensive experiment tried by some 
telcos.  In some rural places in SC it was tried because the strong 
thunderstorms in the area tended to frequent damage above ground lines.  
The thought  was putting them underground, while a bit more costly, 
might save some money in the long run.  So in certain sections they 
tried running underground.  As a result, those areas of the state 
usually now can't get things like DSL because it costs them too much to 
repull the grade of line to support it.  That is until they suffer water 
damage such as in places like Mississippi after the last hurricanes.


But I digress...


Raymond McKay
President
RAYNET Technologies LLC
http://www.raynettech.com
(860) 693-2226 x 31
Toll Free (877) 693-2226
___


That is very interesting.  I used to have two PSTN lines here but now we 
use one PSTN and one VOIP nicely unified through Asterisk so people 
don't really know which they are using.


I am unable to get DSL here, so maybe thats a clue as to why.  The line 
we got rid of would not work well in the spring unless you first phoned 
it from the first line to dry it out or something a bit then you could 
dial over it.  The bad line was an expensive commercial line too that 
apparently went to a more local switch.  The more reliable one that we 
kept goes to a station about 12 or so km away and is quite noisy which 
caused me a lot of grief to get the right echo can settings.


Mike

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-01 Thread Raymond McKay
So now it appears to be working again, don't know what failed, don't know 
what made it work. and afraid of the next power outage at this rural SOHO.




Might I recommend a large UPS connected to the asterisk Box.  Power goes out 
and system then shuts down gracefully... This should equal no worries of 
card damage.


Regards,


Raymond McKay
President
RAYNET Technologies LLC
http://www.raynettech.com
(860) 693-2226 x 31
Toll Free (877) 693-2226 


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-01 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 14:10:06 -0400,
  M.Hockings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 One weakness is the incoming PSTN line, what is the best way to protect 
 that beyond the device at the premises entry ?

It is common for UPS's to provide surge protection for a phone line. That would
probably be a cheap place to start.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-01 Thread M.Hockings

Brian Capouch wrote:

M.Hockings wrote:




Mike (totally UNimpressed with Digium)





Point taken.  I was not so much point fingers but asking what my 
expectation should be and maybe shedding some frustration.  I don't 
really have a lot of experience with this kind of communications gear 


All the more reason for you to fully inform yourself *first*, and then 
start posting negative drivel to a public mailing list.


B.



Fully inform myself of exactly what? Googling for TDM400P diagnostics 
didn't get far and before posting I had already removed and reseated the 
card and all it's connections, verified the configuration and all that. 
 I did all this because my background in chip and board design tells me 
that a great many problems are primarily loose connections.  After all 
that the card was NOT responding and appeared dead.  I would expect that 
even a transient on the PSTN line would only blow the FXO daughter card 
and not leave the PCI card itself unresponsive.


Even now, given that I don't know what caused the problem or what solved 
the problem (for the time being). I might expect that powering the 
system off may cause software errors due to partially written files but 
I would NOT expect it to damage the hardware, particularly just a comm 
card.  Hence *my* feeling for *this* card is that it is unreliable.  It 
is however reassuring to hear that overall the reliability of the Digium 
hardware is good.


Mike

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-07-01 Thread M.Hockings

Raymond McKay wrote:


Might I recommend a large UPS connected to the asterisk Box.  Power goes 
out and system then shuts down gracefully... This should equal no 
worries of card damage.


Regards,


Raymond McKay
President
RAYNET Technologies LLC
http://www.raynettech.com
(860) 693-2226 x 31
Toll Free (877) 693-2226


Yup that looks like it is in our future now.  I had thought it was a 
misconfiguration of the UPS software on the new machine but apparently 
not.  The battery has died in the UPS.  With two machines and displays 
it could run them for almost an hour and I have it set to run for 10 
minutes then start shutdown then power down the ups 5 min later.


Also as Bruno suggests I'll pick a new UPS that has the phone line 
protection as well, though are phone lines are underground to the local 
station even though we are in a rural location.  Cheaper than hanging it 
on poles I guess.


Thanks

Mike

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-06-30 Thread M.Hockings

Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:

On Thursday 29 June 2006 21:38, M.Hockings wrote:

How reliable is Digium hardware in general.?  My new TDM400P just died.


I have a number of Digium T1 products (T100P, TE410P, TE405P and TE406P) as 
well as a few TDM400 based boards.  No failures in the last 2 years or so.



So, at over 2x the cost is Sangoma hardware more sturdy than the Digium
stuff?


Not that I've seen.  I also have a number of Sangoma products.  Both work very 
well for me.  As an engineer, I can also see that the protection on the 
interfaces is comparable.



Mike (totally UNimpressed with Digium)


I don't think this is a Digium problem, at least not yet.  What did their 
customer service people say?  Can you ask for a failure report?  You note 
that power went out.  Generally when this occurs there is a very high chance 
of transient voltage spiking or line swells not only on the residential 
electrical power grid but also on the telephone network.  Do you have any 
telco line protection in place to protect the card from nasties coming in 
from the outside?  Is the protection correctly installed?  How about 
electrical protection?  The MOVs in your power strip and UPS are only good 
for a few hits before they become ineffective (something they never tell 
you).


Unless you know something more than you've presented here it is a little 
premature to start pointing fingers.


-A.


Point taken.  I was not so much point fingers but asking what my 
expectation should be and maybe shedding some frustration.  I don't 
really have a lot of experience with this kind of communications gear 
and it could very well be that one should keep spare daughter boards in 
stock.


I was finally able to get the thing going again but I do not know what I 
did to accomplish that.  I had tried the card in different PCI slots, 
reseated the daughter cards, powered the machine with and without the 
card, checked BIOS settings then after half a day of fiddling it just 
started responding again.  Who knows what the problem was?


As far as heat and stuff go, the card is in the only card in a new 
IBM/Lenovo box and has plenty of air on all sides.  The box itself is 
powered by an AVR type UPS, which according to the graphs it shows is 
keeping the power pretty stable even though dips.


One weakness is the incoming PSTN line, what is the best way to protect 
that beyond the device at the premises entry ?


So now it appears to be working again, don't know what failed, don't 
know what made it work. and afraid of the next power outage at this 
rural SOHO.


Mike

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-06-30 Thread Brian Capouch

M.Hockings wrote:




Mike (totally UNimpressed with Digium)





Point taken.  I was not so much point fingers but asking what my 
expectation should be and maybe shedding some frustration.  I don't 
really have a lot of experience with this kind of communications gear 


All the more reason for you to fully inform yourself *first*, and then 
start posting negative drivel to a public mailing list.


B.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Digium Hardware Reliability

2006-06-30 Thread John Novack



M.Hockings wrote:

One weakness is the incoming PSTN line, what is the best way to 
protect that beyond the device at the premises entry ?


The device at the entry, assuming it was even installed correctly, is 
there to protect the PSTN Central Office, NOT your equipment.
There are many sites on the net that discuss protection, and lots  
protectors available.
No easy answer, given no one knows where in the world you are, and what 
sort of hazards there might be.
In New York City, or Washington D.C. with underground cables, protection 
can be somewhat less than in Russell Kansas, as one example.


All of that said, it sounds as if your problems had a lot more to do 
with linux and Asterisk configuration issues than ingress of foreign 
potentials. Components damaged by power outages, crossed power and PSTN 
lines and such seldom heal themselves
Start with a good UPS, good grounding and some good protection on the 
PSTN line.


John Novack




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users