RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
On Monday, September 04, 2006 3:22 PM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: What's happen to you guys? Nothing. Why? I am not yelling, just asking. Maybe in a bit stressed out kind of way. It is sure not a dialplan question! Without having all necessary information that is hard to say. Maybe one phone comes in a different context than the other etc. Lot's of things that could go wrong in the dialplan. If it would be a dialplan question, than it would be for each dialing, but it isn't. If we are talking about the same context and same way of dialing: True. You mentioned SIP message and that makes me wonder! Are we not using here dtmf ?? I somehow had the impression that you are using the transfer button on the SNOM which would tell the SNOM to transfer the call. You are obviously talking about attended/unattended transfer via Asterisk only, correct? Then ignore my suggestion. If it is a sequence of tones, Well... If you are using inband DTMF: correct. Otherwise DTMF may correspond to SIP messages as well but let's not get into that. I suppose you are using inband DTMF and G.711? than why is it different if it is in a string (like snom) or another phone, with single tones? If the dialplan is not responsible obviously the phones are behaving differently. Maybe the DTMF sequence is not transmitted correctly but on the other hand I am using SNOMs with inband DTMF without any problems. Maybe the phone (as others suggested) is doing some number/pattern matching magic which you have to fiddle with. If we understand this part, than is the question, where can I turn on the system to take a longer break between tones still as a string? The default setup should not be a problem with SNOMs (at least I never read anything about it) but have a look at the features.conf options. That should proof my thoughts (and that without yelling, ... hehehehe) But a lot of exclamationsmarks. :-) Just kidding. As others pointed out: We (at least I) would need the entire picture (the relevant parts of your dialplan etc.) to really help you here. Regards, JP ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
On Tuesday, September 05, 2006 2:06 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: In my opinion Asterisk remembers all numbers and therefore it does not wait for the 4, since it found a match. This is in VoIP (in my If both phones enter the dialplan the same way and one phone does work then it should not be a problem with the dialplan or with the way Asterisk is doing the match. You pointed that out yourself. AFAIK there is no overlapping in the dialplan. Either the phone (when dialing, doing a SIP transfer etc.) or Asterisk (when doing an attended/unattended transfer) is waiting the specified time for more digits. If no other number is received it then feeds the received number in the dialplan. So either your phone is just transmitting 601, Asterisk only understands 601 or you do have a problem with your dialplan. The only other option would be a general dialplan bug which is not too likely since most of us would have run into the exact same problem. What do debugs on the Asterisk show you? Do a SIP debug etc. Are you using inband or outband DTMF? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the first match count? Because the transfer button on the SNOM is using a totally different mechanism than sending # to Asterisk. On your snom configuration (like ours) the phone does not start to create/send a SIP message until you hit OK. At that time the entire number is there and a complete SIP transfer is created. Cool down a bit. The problem you are having is most probably just a dialplan problem. It takes some time and experience to get those things right. No need to yell here... ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote: On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the first match count? Because the transfer button on the SNOM is using a totally different mechanism than sending # to Asterisk. On your snom configuration (like ours) the phone does not start to create/send a SIP message until you hit OK. At that time the entire number is there and a complete SIP transfer is created. Cool down a bit. The problem you are having is most probably just a dialplan problem. It takes some time and experience to get those things right. No need to yell here... What's happen to you guys? I am not yelling, just asking. It is sure not a dialplan question! If it would be a dialplan question, than it would be for each dialing, but it isn't. You mentioned SIP message and that makes me wonder! Are we not using here dtmf ?? that is in my opinion not a sip message, isn't it? If it is a sequence of tones, than why is it different if it is in a string (like snom) or another phone, with single tones? If we understand this part, than is the question, where can I turn on the system to take a longer break between tones still as a string? Back to the dialplan: A Voip number can have different length of digits. Each number is seen as a complete picture, and so a three digit and a four digit number is something different. While in the legacy telephony the digits are worked down one by one and if there is no more use of the digits, they are just garbage and will be not used. Unlike in VoIP, where you can have a three digit number and if you dial four digit, than it is a WRONG number I just verified that: I dialed from 601 to 61522, however, 61522 does not exist, but 615 exists. Guess what? I get a busy tone! That should proof my thoughts (and that without yelling, ... hehehehe) bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
Ronald, Like someone already told you, you should explain more clearly the way you try to transfer, we need more details on the procedure, using which button on which phone. We need every detail to help you. This as nothing to do with the way the dial plan is loaded, this is totally false. I'm sure most of the people here don't understand how you try to transfer. David -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 4 septembre 2006 09:22 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote: On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the first match count? Because the transfer button on the SNOM is using a totally different mechanism than sending # to Asterisk. On your snom configuration (like ours) the phone does not start to create/send a SIP message until you hit OK. At that time the entire number is there and a complete SIP transfer is created. Cool down a bit. The problem you are having is most probably just a dialplan problem. It takes some time and experience to get those things right. No need to yell here... What's happen to you guys? I am not yelling, just asking. It is sure not a dialplan question! If it would be a dialplan question, than it would be for each dialing, but it isn't. You mentioned SIP message and that makes me wonder! Are we not using here dtmf ?? that is in my opinion not a sip message, isn't it? If it is a sequence of tones, than why is it different if it is in a string (like snom) or another phone, with single tones? If we understand this part, than is the question, where can I turn on the system to take a longer break between tones still as a string? Back to the dialplan: A Voip number can have different length of digits. Each number is seen as a complete picture, and so a three digit and a four digit number is something different. While in the legacy telephony the digits are worked down one by one and if there is no more use of the digits, they are just garbage and will be not used. Unlike in VoIP, where you can have a three digit number and if you dial four digit, than it is a WRONG number I just verified that: I dialed from 601 to 61522, however, 61522 does not exist, but 615 exists. Guess what? I get a busy tone! That should proof my thoughts (and that without yelling, ... hehehehe) bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, Like someone already told you, you should explain more clearly the way you try to transfer, we need more details on the procedure, using which button on which phone. We need every detail to help you. This as nothing to do with the way the dial plan is loaded, this is totally false. I'm sure most of the people here don't understand how you try to transfer. David David, I am not sure how the explanation how to punch the keys changes something, ;-.) Ok, here we go: Snom: pick up the phone and hit ##6014 followed by [ok] Noname: pick up the phone and hit ##6014 must be pushed very fast!!! No end # needed, since the phone 601 starts to ring as soon I reach 1. In my opinion Asterisk remembers all numbers and therefore it does not wait for the 4, since it found a match. This is in VoIP (in my opinion) wrong, since overlapping numbers are allowed. Sip message / dtmf, this is something different! How is the transfer made? Maybe snom does send a sip message, while the noname only send dtmf tones. bye Ronald -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 4 septembre 2006 09:22 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote: On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the first match count? Because the transfer button on the SNOM is using a totally different mechanism than sending # to Asterisk. On your snom configuration (like ours) the phone does not start to create/send a SIP message until you hit OK. At that time the entire number is there and a complete SIP transfer is created. Cool down a bit. The problem you are having is most probably just a dialplan problem. It takes some time and experience to get those things right. No need to yell here... What's happen to you guys? I am not yelling, just asking. It is sure not a dialplan question! If it would be a dialplan question, than it would be for each dialing, but it isn't. You mentioned SIP message and that makes me wonder! Are we not using here dtmf ?? that is in my opinion not a sip message, isn't it? If it is a sequence of tones, than why is it different if it is in a string (like snom) or another phone, with single tones? If we understand this part, than is the question, where can I turn on the system to take a longer break between tones still as a string? Back to the dialplan: A Voip number can have different length of digits. Each number is seen as a complete picture, and so a three digit and a four digit number is something different. While in the legacy telephony the digits are worked down one by one and if there is no more use of the digits, they are just garbage and will be not used. Unlike in VoIP, where you can have a three digit number and if you dial four digit, than it is a WRONG number I just verified that: I dialed from 601 to 61522, however, 61522 does not exist, but 615 exists. Guess what? I get a busy tone! That should proof my thoughts (and that without yelling, ... hehehehe) bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-4, 2006/09/01 Tested on: 2006/9/4 ¤U¤È 11:40:24 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com -- Ronald Wiplinger (CEO of ELMIT) http://www.elmit.com http://voip.elmit.com http://e-paper.elmit.com Tel. (M) +886.939.775.516 (O) +886.2.2835.7765 (ENUM) or FWD 511208 - I'm a SpamCon Foundation Member, #694, Verify it at http://www.spamcon.org PS: Spam prevention! Our system is protected with a spam prevention program. If you send us an e-mail, our system will send you a confirmation message back. Just reply to this confirmation message please. After receiving this confirmation message, our system will send the hold message (one) and all future messages (after the received confirmation message) to me without asking you again. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
Please excuse the top-posting. In features.conf, uncomment transferdigittimeout and adjust its timing as desired. You may also want to uncomment and adjust featuredigittimeout to a higher value as well. Also, since the dialplan does first match, you can eliminate the problem by putting the 4 digit extensions before the 3 digit extensions in the dialplan. See the match as you go section at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+Extension+Matching HTH routerguy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Wiplinger Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:06 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, Like someone already told you, you should explain more clearly the way you try to transfer, we need more details on the procedure, using which button on which phone. We need every detail to help you. This as nothing to do with the way the dial plan is loaded, this is totally false. I'm sure most of the people here don't understand how you try to transfer. David David, I am not sure how the explanation how to punch the keys changes something, ;-.) Ok, here we go: Snom: pick up the phone and hit ##6014 followed by [ok] Noname: pick up the phone and hit ##6014 must be pushed very fast!!! No end # needed, since the phone 601 starts to ring as soon I reach 1. In my opinion Asterisk remembers all numbers and therefore it does not wait for the 4, since it found a match. This is in VoIP (in my opinion) wrong, since overlapping numbers are allowed. Sip message / dtmf, this is something different! How is the transfer made? Maybe snom does send a sip message, while the noname only send dtmf tones. bye Ronald -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 4 septembre 2006 09:22 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote: On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the first match count? Because the transfer button on the SNOM is using a totally different mechanism than sending # to Asterisk. On your snom configuration (like ours) the phone does not start to create/send a SIP message until you hit OK. At that time the entire number is there and a complete SIP transfer is created. Cool down a bit. The problem you are having is most probably just a dialplan problem. It takes some time and experience to get those things right. No need to yell here... What's happen to you guys? I am not yelling, just asking. It is sure not a dialplan question! If it would be a dialplan question, than it would be for each dialing, but it isn't. You mentioned SIP message and that makes me wonder! Are we not using here dtmf ?? that is in my opinion not a sip message, isn't it? If it is a sequence of tones, than why is it different if it is in a string (like snom) or another phone, with single tones? If we understand this part, than is the question, where can I turn on the system to take a longer break between tones still as a string? Back to the dialplan: A Voip number can have different length of digits. Each number is seen as a complete picture, and so a three digit and a four digit number is something different. While in the legacy telephony the digits are worked down one by one and if there is no more use of the digits, they are just garbage and will be not used. Unlike in VoIP, where you can have a three digit number and if you dial four digit, than it is a WRONG number I just verified that: I dialed from 601 to 61522, however, 61522 does not exist, but 615 exists. Guess what? I get a busy tone! That should proof my thoughts (and that without yelling, ... hehehehe) bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-4, 2006/09/01 Tested on: 2006/9/4 ¤U¤È 11:40:24 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com -- Ronald Wiplinger (CEO of ELMIT) http://www.elmit.com http://voip.elmit.com http://e-paper.elmit.com Tel. (M) +886.939.775.516 (O
Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
wendell hamilton wrote: Please excuse the top-posting. ... so we are faster at the solution, ... ;-) In features.conf, uncomment transferdigittimeout and adjust its timing as desired. You may also want to uncomment and adjust featuredigittimeout to a higher value as well. That was it!!! Now it works!!! Also, since the dialplan does first match, you can eliminate the problem by putting the 4 digit extensions before the 3 digit extensions in the dialplan. See the match as you go section at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+Extension+Matching Thank you for the link, btw. your comment above does not match the link. Copy of the important part of your provided link: Example FooBar Incorporated wants their incoming telephone calls to be answered with a voice message welcoming the caller and inviting them to choose which extension they want. FooBar has six telephone extensions. Their extension numbers are 1, 2, 21, 22, 31, 32. So this is the context created for incoming calls for FooBar Incorporated: [incoming] exten = s,1,Background(welcome-to-foobar-incorporated) exten = 1,1,Dial(Zap/1) exten = 2,1,Dial(Zap/2) exten = 21,1,Dial(Zap/3) exten = 22,1,Dial(Zap/4 exten = 31,1,Dial(Zap/5) exten = 32,1,Dial(Zap/6) When you call FooBar, Asterisk plays the welcome-to-foobar-incorporated.gsm sound file. After that, having run out of commands to execute, it waits for you to dial something. This is what Asterisk would do if you dialed various options: Number DialedAsterisk's Action 1 Immediately performs Dial (Zap/1) 2 Waits for timeout, then performs Dial(Zap/2) 21 Immediately performs Dial (Zap/3) 22 Immediately performs Dial (Zap/4) 3 Waits for timeout, then hangs up. 31 Immediately performs Dial (Zap/5) 32 Immediately performs Dial (Zap/6) 4 Immediately hangs up. Note that when a caller tries to dial extension 2, they are not connected immediately. Asterisk waits to see if the caller dials more digits, to determine whether the caller wants extension 2 or 21 or 22. As callers would like to be connected immediately if possible, it would be more user-friendly to avoid using ambiguous extension numbers. Thanks for the solution, bye Ronald HTH routerguy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronald Wiplinger Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 5:06 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, Like someone already told you, you should explain more clearly the way you try to transfer, we need more details on the procedure, using which button on which phone. We need every detail to help you. This as nothing to do with the way the dial plan is loaded, this is totally false. I'm sure most of the people here don't understand how you try to transfer. David David, I am not sure how the explanation how to punch the keys changes something, ;-.) Ok, here we go: Snom: pick up the phone and hit ##6014 followed by [ok] Noname: pick up the phone and hit ##6014 must be pushed very fast!!! No end # needed, since the phone 601 starts to ring as soon I reach 1. In my opinion Asterisk remembers all numbers and therefore it does not wait for the 4, since it found a match. This is in VoIP (in my opinion) wrong, since overlapping numbers are allowed. Sip message / dtmf, this is something different! How is the transfer made? Maybe snom does send a sip message, while the noname only send dtmf tones. bye Ronald -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 4 septembre 2006 09:22 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote: On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the first match count? Because the transfer button on the SNOM is using a totally different mechanism than sending # to Asterisk. On your snom configuration (like ours) the phone does not start to create/send a SIP message until you hit OK. At that time the entire number is there and a complete SIP transfer is created. Cool down a bit. The problem you are having is most probably just a dialplan problem. It takes some time and experience to get those things right. No need to yell here... What's happen to you guys? I am not yelling, just asking. It is sure not a dialplan question! If it would be a dialplan question
RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
Ronald, If I understand well, the second phones have a building digit map. It has nothing to do with Asterisk! Asterisk only executes what it receives from the phone. ## In your scenario is the Asterisk built-in transfer function? The ways your phone sends the DTMF depend on what you have configured in you SIP.conf. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+sip+dtmfmode David -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 4 septembre 2006 20:06 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, Like someone already told you, you should explain more clearly the way you try to transfer, we need more details on the procedure, using which button on which phone. We need every detail to help you. This as nothing to do with the way the dial plan is loaded, this is totally false. I'm sure most of the people here don't understand how you try to transfer. David David, I am not sure how the explanation how to punch the keys changes something, ;-.) Ok, here we go: Snom: pick up the phone and hit ##6014 followed by [ok] Noname: pick up the phone and hit ##6014 must be pushed very fast!!! No end # needed, since the phone 601 starts to ring as soon I reach 1. In my opinion Asterisk remembers all numbers and therefore it does not wait for the 4, since it found a match. This is in VoIP (in my opinion) wrong, since overlapping numbers are allowed. Sip message / dtmf, this is something different! How is the transfer made? Maybe snom does send a sip message, while the noname only send dtmf tones. bye Ronald -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 4 septembre 2006 09:22 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote: On Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:40 AM Ronald Wiplinger wrote: try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the first match count? Because the transfer button on the SNOM is using a totally different mechanism than sending # to Asterisk. On your snom configuration (like ours) the phone does not start to create/send a SIP message until you hit OK. At that time the entire number is there and a complete SIP transfer is created. Cool down a bit. The problem you are having is most probably just a dialplan problem. It takes some time and experience to get those things right. No need to yell here... What's happen to you guys? I am not yelling, just asking. It is sure not a dialplan question! If it would be a dialplan question, than it would be for each dialing, but it isn't. You mentioned SIP message and that makes me wonder! Are we not using here dtmf ?? that is in my opinion not a sip message, isn't it? If it is a sequence of tones, than why is it different if it is in a string (like snom) or another phone, with single tones? If we understand this part, than is the question, where can I turn on the system to take a longer break between tones still as a string? Back to the dialplan: A Voip number can have different length of digits. Each number is seen as a complete picture, and so a three digit and a four digit number is something different. While in the legacy telephony the digits are worked down one by one and if there is no more use of the digits, they are just garbage and will be not used. Unlike in VoIP, where you can have a three digit number and if you dial four digit, than it is a WRONG number I just verified that: I dialed from 601 to 61522, however, 61522 does not exist, but 615 exists. Guess what? I get a busy tone! That should proof my thoughts (and that without yelling, ... hehehehe) bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-4, 2006/09/01 Tested on: 2006/9/4 ¤U¤È 11:40:24 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com -- Ronald Wiplinger (CEO of ELMIT) http://www.elmit.com http://voip.elmit.com http://e-paper.elmit.com Tel. (M) +886.939.775.516 (O) +886.2.2835.7765 (ENUM) or FWD 511208 - I'm a SpamCon Foundation Member, #694
RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
Hi all, Ronald, if you are using #, try adjusting the featuredigittimeout parameter in features.conf.This is the max time between digits for feature activation. If is small, * could dial the wrong number, in your case 601 instead of 6014. I think that you are not using # while your are using snom, because you said that you needed to dial # in order to finish the transfer (this it's no necessary for *). Or snom is catching the # and driving the transfer. fabay -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Ronald Wiplinger Enviado el: Sábado, 02 de Septiembre de 2006 10:40 p.m. Para: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Asunto: Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Tim St. Pierre wrote: Are you using # to transfer? If so, it's not sending it as a new call, it's just sending asterisk digits using whatever DTMF mode. Asterisk parses these based on a first match in the dialplan. Make sure that the longer extension numbers are loaded first in the dialplan. That is a good thought. I can remember that the docs said that you cannot force the order of the dialplan, except with includes. I will try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the first match count? bye Ronald -Tim On September 2, 2006 20:12, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: Kevin Smith wrote: Dialing a number and transferring a number are two different things. And no offense, you are not really providing a lot of details along with your problem. So you can dial the numbers but not transfer from one to the other. I was not thinking that it would be too much difference. Therefore I also do not know what more info could help to distinguish the problem. I hardly can post my entire configuration. What does the CLI say when you try the transfer? That would provide a lot of information that could clue you in to what is going on. You hit another problem with that. I hardly see here anything anymore. The messages fly by so fast, Especially annoying messages: chan_sip.c:10888 handle_request_register: Registration from 'sip:192.168.250.20' failed for '192.168.250.244' - Username/auth name mismatch -- Got SIP response 486 Busy Here back from 192.168.250.244 -- Got SIP response 400 Bad Request back from xx.xx.xx.126 NOTICE[5936]: chan_sip.c:9600 handle_response_register: Failed to authenticate on REGISTER to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (Tries 3) . It would be nice to filter the CLI for such investigation for a moment. What type of phones are you using? Some phones have the ability to pattern match and wait for a certain number of seconds before sending the number to asterisk. For example. On our Polycom phones a user has 3 seconds (between digits) to enter in 10 digits. This could be where most of your problem is. That is a very good point and I will contact the manufacturer of these no-name phones. My guess the problem lies with the Phones, not Asterisk form the information you provided. I disagree with that! Why Asterisk treats dialing and transfer different. That makes not really sense, does it? bye Ronald Kevin Ronald Wiplinger wrote: David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, You seem to be a little bit angry about VoIP. If so, I could give you my old Nortel system. Does this would make you happy? David David, I am not angry about VoIP, but please send my your old Nortel system ! I just do not understand why I can DIAL 601 and 6014, but not use blind transfer. Is the question too difficult? I am sure there is somewhere a switch to say, wait two seconds (as for dialing) before you assume it is a complete number. It is also strange that snom phone can do it correct, because it uses the ok key. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!) Both answers have actually not lead to any step further, but to more messages. I use to refer to such answers as NON-ANSWERS. Please only reply if and really only if you know a solution for the problem! Thanks for your understanding. bye Ronald - again, I am not angry at all. WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan? I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last digit!!! Where can I set that it waits for it? The beauty on voip IS that you can have different length and overlapping, bye Ronald CP On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get
Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. CP On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since snom requires me to hit ok If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the busy signal and I hang up as usually with transfer. Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, What could be the problem ? bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan? I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last digit!!! Where can I set that it waits for it? The beauty on voip IS that you can have different length and overlapping, bye Ronald CP On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since snom requires me to hit ok If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the busy signal and I hang up as usually with transfer. Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, What could be the problem ? bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-4, 2006/09/01 Tested on: 2006/9/2 ¤U¤È 03:52:00 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com -- Ronald Wiplinger (CEO of ELMIT) http://www.elmit.com http://voip.elmit.com http://e-paper.elmit.com Tel. (M) +886.939.775.516 (O) +886.2.2835.7765 (ENUM) or FWD 511208 - I'm a SpamCon Foundation Member, #694, Verify it at http://www.spamcon.org PS: Spam prevention! Our system is protected with a spam prevention program. If you send us an e-mail, our system will send you a confirmation message back. Just reply to this confirmation message please. After receiving this confirmation message, our system will send the hold message (one) and all future messages (after the received confirmation message) to me without asking you again. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
Ronald, You seem to be a little bit angry about VoIP. If so, I could give you my old Nortel system. Does this would make you happy? David -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan? I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last digit!!! Where can I set that it waits for it? The beauty on voip IS that you can have different length and overlapping, bye Ronald CP On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since snom requires me to hit ok If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the busy signal and I hang up as usually with transfer. Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, What could be the problem ? bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-4, 2006/09/01 Tested on: 2006/9/2 ¤U¤È 03:52:00 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com -- Ronald Wiplinger (CEO of ELMIT) http://www.elmit.com http://voip.elmit.com http://e-paper.elmit.com Tel. (M) +886.939.775.516 (O) +886.2.2835.7765 (ENUM) or FWD 511208 - I'm a SpamCon Foundation Member, #694, Verify it at http://www.spamcon.org PS: Spam prevention! Our system is protected with a spam prevention program. If you send us an e-mail, our system will send you a confirmation message back. Just reply to this confirmation message please. After receiving this confirmation message, our system will send the hold message (one) and all future messages (after the received confirmation message) to me without asking you again. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, You seem to be a little bit angry about VoIP. If so, I could give you my old Nortel system. Does this would make you happy? David David, I am not angry about VoIP, but please send my your old Nortel system ! I just do not understand why I can DIAL 601 and 6014, but not use blind transfer. Is the question too difficult? I am sure there is somewhere a switch to say, wait two seconds (as for dialing) before you assume it is a complete number. It is also strange that snom phone can do it correct, because it uses the ok key. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!) Both answers have actually not lead to any step further, but to more messages. I use to refer to such answers as NON-ANSWERS. Please only reply if and really only if you know a solution for the problem! Thanks for your understanding. bye Ronald - again, I am not angry at all. WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan? I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last digit!!! Where can I set that it waits for it? The beauty on voip IS that you can have different length and overlapping, bye Ronald CP On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since snom requires me to hit ok If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the busy signal and I hang up as usually with transfer. Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, What could be the problem ? bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-4, 2006/09/01 Tested on: 2006/9/2 ¤U¤È 03:52:00 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com -- Ronald Wiplinger (CEO of ELMIT) http://www.elmit.com http://voip.elmit.com http://e-paper.elmit.com Tel. (M) +886.939.775.516 (O) +886.2.2835.7765 (ENUM) or FWD 511208 - I'm a SpamCon Foundation Member, #694, Verify it at http://www.spamcon.org PS: Spam prevention! Our system is protected with a spam prevention program. If you send us an e-mail, our system will send you a confirmation message back. Just reply to this confirmation message please. After receiving this confirmation message, our system will send the hold message (one) and all future messages (after the received confirmation message) to me without asking you again. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
Dialing a number and transferring a number are two different things. And no offense, you are not really providing a lot of details along with your problem. So you can dial the numbers but not transfer from one to the other. What does the CLI say when you try the transfer? That would provide a lot of information that could clue you in to what is going on. What type of phones are you using? Some phones have the ability to pattern match and wait for a certain number of seconds before sending the number to asterisk. For example. On our Polycom phones a user has 3 seconds (between digits) to enter in 10 digits. This could be where most of your problem is. My guess the problem lies with the Phones, not Asterisk form the information you provided. Kevin Ronald Wiplinger wrote: David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, You seem to be a little bit angry about VoIP. If so, I could give you my old Nortel system. Does this would make you happy? David David, I am not angry about VoIP, but please send my your old Nortel system ! I just do not understand why I can DIAL 601 and 6014, but not use blind transfer. Is the question too difficult? I am sure there is somewhere a switch to say, wait two seconds (as for dialing) before you assume it is a complete number. It is also strange that snom phone can do it correct, because it uses the ok key. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!) Both answers have actually not lead to any step further, but to more messages. I use to refer to such answers as NON-ANSWERS. Please only reply if and really only if you know a solution for the problem! Thanks for your understanding. bye Ronald - again, I am not angry at all. WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan? I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last digit!!! Where can I set that it waits for it? The beauty on voip IS that you can have different length and overlapping, bye Ronald CP On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since snom requires me to hit ok If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the busy signal and I hang up as usually with transfer. Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, What could be the problem ? bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-4, 2006/09/01 Tested on: 2006/9/2 ¤U¤È 03:52:00 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
I have just noticed that my X-Lite soft phones don't dial 3-4 digit extensions without first dialing it in the display and then hitting send. So tthat is an issue with the phone you think? Ok, I'll start there for the inter digit timeout, see if there is a certain dial string lenth before it will transmit. Nick -- Nick Ellson CCDA, CCNP, CCSP, CCAI, MCSE 2000, Security+, Network+ Network Hobbyist, VFR Private Pilot. On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, Kevin Smith wrote: Dialing a number and transferring a number are two different things. And no offense, you are not really providing a lot of details along with your problem. So you can dial the numbers but not transfer from one to the other. What does the CLI say when you try the transfer? That would provide a lot of information that could clue you in to what is going on. What type of phones are you using? Some phones have the ability to pattern match and wait for a certain number of seconds before sending the number to asterisk. For example. On our Polycom phones a user has 3 seconds (between digits) to enter in 10 digits. This could be where most of your problem is. My guess the problem lies with the Phones, not Asterisk form the information you provided. Kevin Ronald Wiplinger wrote: David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, You seem to be a little bit angry about VoIP. If so, I could give you my old Nortel system. Does this would make you happy? David David, I am not angry about VoIP, but please send my your old Nortel system ! I just do not understand why I can DIAL 601 and 6014, but not use blind transfer. Is the question too difficult? I am sure there is somewhere a switch to say, wait two seconds (as for dialing) before you assume it is a complete number. It is also strange that snom phone can do it correct, because it uses the ok key. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!) Both answers have actually not lead to any step further, but to more messages. I use to refer to such answers as NON-ANSWERS. Please only reply if and really only if you know a solution for the problem! Thanks for your understanding. bye Ronald - again, I am not angry at all. WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan? I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last digit!!! Where can I set that it waits for it? The beauty on voip IS that you can have different length and overlapping, bye Ronald CP On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since snom requires me to hit ok If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the busy signal and I hang up as usually with transfer. Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, What could be the problem ? bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users --- avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0635-4, 2006/09/01 Tested on: 2006/9/2 ¤U¤È 03:52:00 avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
Kevin Smith wrote: Dialing a number and transferring a number are two different things. And no offense, you are not really providing a lot of details along with your problem. So you can dial the numbers but not transfer from one to the other. I was not thinking that it would be too much difference. Therefore I also do not know what more info could help to distinguish the problem. I hardly can post my entire configuration. What does the CLI say when you try the transfer? That would provide a lot of information that could clue you in to what is going on. You hit another problem with that. I hardly see here anything anymore. The messages fly by so fast, Especially annoying messages: chan_sip.c:10888 handle_request_register: Registration from 'sip:192.168.250.20' failed for '192.168.250.244' - Username/auth name mismatch -- Got SIP response 486 Busy Here back from 192.168.250.244 -- Got SIP response 400 Bad Request back from xx.xx.xx.126 NOTICE[5936]: chan_sip.c:9600 handle_response_register: Failed to authenticate on REGISTER to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (Tries 3) . It would be nice to filter the CLI for such investigation for a moment. What type of phones are you using? Some phones have the ability to pattern match and wait for a certain number of seconds before sending the number to asterisk. For example. On our Polycom phones a user has 3 seconds (between digits) to enter in 10 digits. This could be where most of your problem is. That is a very good point and I will contact the manufacturer of these no-name phones. My guess the problem lies with the Phones, not Asterisk form the information you provided. I disagree with that! Why Asterisk treats dialing and transfer different. That makes not really sense, does it? bye Ronald Kevin Ronald Wiplinger wrote: David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, You seem to be a little bit angry about VoIP. If so, I could give you my old Nortel system. Does this would make you happy? David David, I am not angry about VoIP, but please send my your old Nortel system ! I just do not understand why I can DIAL 601 and 6014, but not use blind transfer. Is the question too difficult? I am sure there is somewhere a switch to say, wait two seconds (as for dialing) before you assume it is a complete number. It is also strange that snom phone can do it correct, because it uses the ok key. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!) Both answers have actually not lead to any step further, but to more messages. I use to refer to such answers as NON-ANSWERS. Please only reply if and really only if you know a solution for the problem! Thanks for your understanding. bye Ronald - again, I am not angry at all. WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan? I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last digit!!! Where can I set that it waits for it? The beauty on voip IS that you can have different length and overlapping, bye Ronald CP On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since snom requires me to hit ok If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the busy signal and I hang up as usually with transfer. Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, What could be the problem ? bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
Are you using # to transfer? If so, it's not sending it as a new call, it's just sending asterisk digits using whatever DTMF mode. Asterisk parses these based on a first match in the dialplan. Make sure that the longer extension numbers are loaded first in the dialplan. -Tim On September 2, 2006 20:12, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: Kevin Smith wrote: Dialing a number and transferring a number are two different things. And no offense, you are not really providing a lot of details along with your problem. So you can dial the numbers but not transfer from one to the other. I was not thinking that it would be too much difference. Therefore I also do not know what more info could help to distinguish the problem. I hardly can post my entire configuration. What does the CLI say when you try the transfer? That would provide a lot of information that could clue you in to what is going on. You hit another problem with that. I hardly see here anything anymore. The messages fly by so fast, Especially annoying messages: chan_sip.c:10888 handle_request_register: Registration from 'sip:192.168.250.20' failed for '192.168.250.244' - Username/auth name mismatch -- Got SIP response 486 Busy Here back from 192.168.250.244 -- Got SIP response 400 Bad Request back from xx.xx.xx.126 NOTICE[5936]: chan_sip.c:9600 handle_response_register: Failed to authenticate on REGISTER to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (Tries 3) . It would be nice to filter the CLI for such investigation for a moment. What type of phones are you using? Some phones have the ability to pattern match and wait for a certain number of seconds before sending the number to asterisk. For example. On our Polycom phones a user has 3 seconds (between digits) to enter in 10 digits. This could be where most of your problem is. That is a very good point and I will contact the manufacturer of these no-name phones. My guess the problem lies with the Phones, not Asterisk form the information you provided. I disagree with that! Why Asterisk treats dialing and transfer different. That makes not really sense, does it? bye Ronald Kevin Ronald Wiplinger wrote: David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, You seem to be a little bit angry about VoIP. If so, I could give you my old Nortel system. Does this would make you happy? David David, I am not angry about VoIP, but please send my your old Nortel system ! I just do not understand why I can DIAL 601 and 6014, but not use blind transfer. Is the question too difficult? I am sure there is somewhere a switch to say, wait two seconds (as for dialing) before you assume it is a complete number. It is also strange that snom phone can do it correct, because it uses the ok key. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!) Both answers have actually not lead to any step further, but to more messages. I use to refer to such answers as NON-ANSWERS. Please only reply if and really only if you know a solution for the problem! Thanks for your understanding. bye Ronald - again, I am not angry at all. WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan? I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last digit!!! Where can I set that it waits for it? The beauty on voip IS that you can have different length and overlapping, bye Ronald CP On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since snom requires me to hit ok If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the busy signal and I hang up as usually with transfer. Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, What could be the problem ? bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Tim St. Pierre IP telephony specialist sip://[EMAIL PROTECTED] Toronto: 647 722 6930 Toll-Free 1 888 488 6940 [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpy80N6wIb40.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
Tim St. Pierre wrote: Are you using # to transfer? If so, it's not sending it as a new call, it's just sending asterisk digits using whatever DTMF mode. Asterisk parses these based on a first match in the dialplan. Make sure that the longer extension numbers are loaded first in the dialplan. That is a good thought. I can remember that the docs said that you cannot force the order of the dialplan, except with includes. I will try that way. However, I have doubts as well. If you are right, than why snom phone does not have this problem? Would not here also the first match count? bye Ronald -Tim On September 2, 2006 20:12, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: Kevin Smith wrote: Dialing a number and transferring a number are two different things. And no offense, you are not really providing a lot of details along with your problem. So you can dial the numbers but not transfer from one to the other. I was not thinking that it would be too much difference. Therefore I also do not know what more info could help to distinguish the problem. I hardly can post my entire configuration. What does the CLI say when you try the transfer? That would provide a lot of information that could clue you in to what is going on. You hit another problem with that. I hardly see here anything anymore. The messages fly by so fast, Especially annoying messages: chan_sip.c:10888 handle_request_register: Registration from 'sip:192.168.250.20' failed for '192.168.250.244' - Username/auth name mismatch -- Got SIP response 486 Busy Here back from 192.168.250.244 -- Got SIP response 400 Bad Request back from xx.xx.xx.126 NOTICE[5936]: chan_sip.c:9600 handle_response_register: Failed to authenticate on REGISTER to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' (Tries 3) . It would be nice to filter the CLI for such investigation for a moment. What type of phones are you using? Some phones have the ability to pattern match and wait for a certain number of seconds before sending the number to asterisk. For example. On our Polycom phones a user has 3 seconds (between digits) to enter in 10 digits. This could be where most of your problem is. That is a very good point and I will contact the manufacturer of these no-name phones. My guess the problem lies with the Phones, not Asterisk form the information you provided. I disagree with that! Why Asterisk treats dialing and transfer different. That makes not really sense, does it? bye Ronald Kevin Ronald Wiplinger wrote: David Gagnon wrote: Ronald, You seem to be a little bit angry about VoIP. If so, I could give you my old Nortel system. Does this would make you happy? David David, I am not angry about VoIP, but please send my your old Nortel system ! I just do not understand why I can DIAL 601 and 6014, but not use blind transfer. Is the question too difficult? I am sure there is somewhere a switch to say, wait two seconds (as for dialing) before you assume it is a complete number. It is also strange that snom phone can do it correct, because it uses the ok key. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Ronald Wiplinger Envoyé : 2 septembre 2006 04:20 À : Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Objet : Re: [asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits Anthony Rodgers wrote: With respect, the problem is with your numbering plan.. This answer is therefore totally nonsense !!! (With all respect!!!) Both answers have actually not lead to any step further, but to more messages. I use to refer to such answers as NON-ANSWERS. Please only reply if and really only if you know a solution for the problem! Thanks for your understanding. bye Ronald - again, I am not angry at all. WHERE do you see a problem in the numbering plan? I see the problem in ASTERISK, because it does not wait for the last digit!!! Where can I set that it waits for it? The beauty on voip IS that you can have different length and overlapping, bye Ronald CP On 1-Sep-06, at 10:37 PM, Ronald Wiplinger wrote: I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since snom requires me to hit ok If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the busy signal and I hang up as usually with transfer. Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, What could be the problem ? bye ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Blind transfer 3/4 digits
I found a problem in blind transfer: I have an extension number 601 and I have an extension 6014 If I get a call on 615 (snom) and transfer to 6014 it works, since snom requires me to hit ok If I get a call on 601 and transfer to 6014, than 601 will get the busy signal and I hang up as usually with transfer. Howerver the caller get the announcements: I could not get that, What could be the problem ? bye Ronald ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
