RE: [asterisk-users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2
What do you mean by outbound CallerID Name? So that when calling a POTS with CallerID service from telco the Name should show up as you send it? If the answer to the above is yes, then stop trying to do that. It won't work, as the name that the POTS subscriber sees is NOT the one you send, but what the provider of that POTS line sees when the do the lookup on the name that is listed (usualy) with the number received as callerid. Ah, that clarifies things a bit. So I have to tell my telco what I want to have show up for each callerID number that I send? On 2/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I there, I have some trouble to do working caller id name for outgoing calls on the PRI we just installed. Caller id name work on incoming calls only. Caller id number work on incoming and outgoing calls. The provider, Goup Telecom, said that's in what i'm sending. They said that I send the cid name in ascii code and to do it working, I need to send it in hex. So I take some traces but i'm unable to figure where is the problem. What I see In case that work: incoming call: [1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58] Facility (len=30, codeset=0) [ 0x9F, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x16, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0E, 'INFOFORTIN FAX' ] PROTOCOL 1F What I see in case that doesn't work: outgoing call: [28 05 b1 69 6e 66 6f] Display (len= 5) Charset: 31 [ info ] completes traces: working: [ 02 01 da d6 08 02 02 34 05 04 03 80 90 a2 18 03 a9 83 81 1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58 1e 02 82 83 6c 0c 21 83 38 31 39 37 38 30 31 32 37 33 70 0b a1 38 31 39 33 34 30 30 39 37 37 ] Informational frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 N(S): 109 0: 0 N(R): 107 P: 0 76 bytes of data -- ACKing all packets from 106 to (but not including) 107 -- Since there was nothing left, stopping T200 counter -- Stopping T203 counter since we got an ACK -- Nothing left, starting T203 counter Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=76 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 564/0x234) (Originator) Message type: SETUP (5) [04 03 80 90 a2] Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Speech (0) Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16) Ext: 1 User information layer 1: u-Law (34) [18 03 a9 83 81] Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit PRI Spare: 0 Exclusive Dchan: 0 ChanSel: Reserved Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 Ext: 1 Channel: 1 ] [1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58] Facility (len=30, codeset=0) [ 0x9F, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x16, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0E, 'INFOFORTIN FAX' ] PROTOCOL 1F 8B 0001 00 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [11]) A1 0016 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [1]) 02 0001 01 (INTEGER: 1) 02 0001 00 (INTEGER: 0) 80 000E 49 4E 46 4F 46 4F 52 54 49 4E 20 46 41 58 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [0]) [1e 02 82 83] Progress Indicator (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Public network serving the local user (2) Ext: 1 Progress Description: Calling equipment is non-ISDN. (3) ] [6c 0c 21 83 38 31 39 37 38 30 31 32 37 33] Calling Number (len=14) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) Presentation: Presentation allowed of network provided number (3) '8197801273' ] [70 0b a1 38 31 39 33 34 30 30 39 37 37] Called Number (len=13) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '8193400977' ] -- Making new call for cr 564 -- Processing Q.931 Call Setup -- Processing IE 4 (cs0, Bearer Capability) -- Processing IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) -- Processing IE 28 (cs0, Facility) Q.932 Interpretation component is not handled Handle Q.932 ROSE Invoke component [ Handling operation 0 ] Handle Name display operation Received caller name 'INFOFORTIN FAX' -- Processing IE 30 (cs0, Progress Indicator) -- Processing IE 108 (cs0, Calling Party Number) -- Processing IE 112 (cs0, Called Party Number) q931.c:3294 q931_receive: call 564 on channel 1 enters state 6 (Call Present) Sending Receiver Ready (110) [ 02 01 01 dc ] Supervisory frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 Zero: 0 S: 0 01: 1 [ RR (receive ready) ] N(R): 110 P/F: 0 0 bytes of data -- Restarting T203 counter -- Restarting T203 counter q931.c:2570 q931_call_proceeding: call 564 on channel 1 enters state 9 (Incoming Call Proceeding) [ 00 01
Re: [asterisk-users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2
On 3/2/07, Webster, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do you mean by outbound CallerID Name? So that when calling a POTS with CallerID service from telco the Name should show up as you send it? If the answer to the above is yes, then stop trying to do that. It won't work, as the name that the POTS subscriber sees is NOT the one you send, but what the provider of that POTS line sees when the do the lookup on the name that is listed (usualy) with the number received as callerid. Ah, that clarifies things a bit. So I have to tell my telco what I want to have show up for each callerID number that I send? Yes you do, and with most telcos it's what you tell them should show up for directory listing, and not all telcos will allow you to set different directory listings for different DIDs. On 2/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I there, I have some trouble to do working caller id name for outgoing calls on the PRI we just installed. Caller id name work on incoming calls only. Caller id number work on incoming and outgoing calls. The provider, Goup Telecom, said that's in what i'm sending. They said that I send the cid name in ascii code and to do it working, I need to send it in hex. So I take some traces but i'm unable to figure where is the problem. What I see In case that work: incoming call: [1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58] Facility (len=30, codeset=0) [ 0x9F, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x16, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0E, 'INFOFORTIN FAX' ] PROTOCOL 1F What I see in case that doesn't work: outgoing call: [28 05 b1 69 6e 66 6f] Display (len= 5) Charset: 31 [ info ] completes traces: working: [ 02 01 da d6 08 02 02 34 05 04 03 80 90 a2 18 03 a9 83 81 1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58 1e 02 82 83 6c 0c 21 83 38 31 39 37 38 30 31 32 37 33 70 0b a1 38 31 39 33 34 30 30 39 37 37 ] Informational frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 N(S): 109 0: 0 N(R): 107 P: 0 76 bytes of data -- ACKing all packets from 106 to (but not including) 107 -- Since there was nothing left, stopping T200 counter -- Stopping T203 counter since we got an ACK -- Nothing left, starting T203 counter Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=76 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 564/0x234) (Originator) Message type: SETUP (5) [04 03 80 90 a2] Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Speech (0) Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16) Ext: 1 User information layer 1: u-Law (34) [18 03 a9 83 81] Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit PRI Spare: 0 Exclusive Dchan: 0 ChanSel: Reserved Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 Ext: 1 Channel: 1 ] [1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58] Facility (len=30, codeset=0) [ 0x9F, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x16, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0E, 'INFOFORTIN FAX' ] PROTOCOL 1F 8B 0001 00 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [11]) A1 0016 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [1]) 02 0001 01 (INTEGER: 1) 02 0001 00 (INTEGER: 0) 80 000E 49 4E 46 4F 46 4F 52 54 49 4E 20 46 41 58 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [0]) [1e 02 82 83] Progress Indicator (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Public network serving the local user (2) Ext: 1 Progress Description: Calling equipment is non-ISDN. (3) ] [6c 0c 21 83 38 31 39 37 38 30 31 32 37 33] Calling Number (len=14) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) Presentation: Presentation allowed of network provided number (3) '8197801273' ] [70 0b a1 38 31 39 33 34 30 30 39 37 37] Called Number (len=13) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '8193400977' ] -- Making new call for cr 564 -- Processing Q.931 Call Setup -- Processing IE 4 (cs0, Bearer Capability) -- Processing IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) -- Processing IE 28 (cs0, Facility) Q.932 Interpretation component is not handled Handle Q.932 ROSE Invoke component [ Handling operation 0 ] Handle Name display operation Received caller name 'INFOFORTIN FAX' -- Processing IE 30 (cs0, Progress Indicator) -- Processing IE 108 (cs0, Calling Party Number) -- Processing IE 112 (cs0, Called Party Number) q931.c:3294 q931_receive: call 564 on channel 1 enters state 6 (Call Present) Sending Receiver Ready (110) [ 02 01 01 dc ] Supervisory frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 Zero: 0 S: 0
Re: [asterisk-users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2
What do you mean by outbound CallerID Name? So that when calling a POTS with CallerID service from telco the Name should show up as you send it? If the answer to the above is yes, then stop trying to do that. It won't work, as the name that the POTS subscriber sees is NOT the one you send, but what the provider of that POTS line sees when the do the lookup on the name that is listed (usualy) with the number received as callerid. On 2/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I there, I have some trouble to do working caller id name for outgoing calls on the PRI we just installed. Caller id name work on incoming calls only. Caller id number work on incoming and outgoing calls. The provider, Goup Telecom, said that's in what i'm sending. They said that I send the cid name in ascii code and to do it working, I need to send it in hex. So I take some traces but i'm unable to figure where is the problem. What I see In case that work: incoming call: [1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58] Facility (len=30, codeset=0) [ 0x9F, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x16, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0E, 'INFOFORTIN FAX' ] PROTOCOL 1F What I see in case that doesn't work: outgoing call: [28 05 b1 69 6e 66 6f] Display (len= 5) Charset: 31 [ info ] completes traces: working: [ 02 01 da d6 08 02 02 34 05 04 03 80 90 a2 18 03 a9 83 81 1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58 1e 02 82 83 6c 0c 21 83 38 31 39 37 38 30 31 32 37 33 70 0b a1 38 31 39 33 34 30 30 39 37 37 ] Informational frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 N(S): 109 0: 0 N(R): 107 P: 0 76 bytes of data -- ACKing all packets from 106 to (but not including) 107 -- Since there was nothing left, stopping T200 counter -- Stopping T203 counter since we got an ACK -- Nothing left, starting T203 counter Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=76 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 564/0x234) (Originator) Message type: SETUP (5) [04 03 80 90 a2] Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Speech (0) Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16) Ext: 1 User information layer 1: u-Law (34) [18 03 a9 83 81] Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit PRI Spare: 0 Exclusive Dchan: 0 ChanSel: Reserved Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 Ext: 1 Channel: 1 ] [1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58] Facility (len=30, codeset=0) [ 0x9F, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x16, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0E, 'INFOFORTIN FAX' ] PROTOCOL 1F 8B 0001 00 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [11]) A1 0016 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [1]) 02 0001 01 (INTEGER: 1) 02 0001 00 (INTEGER: 0) 80 000E 49 4E 46 4F 46 4F 52 54 49 4E 20 46 41 58 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [0]) [1e 02 82 83] Progress Indicator (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Public network serving the local user (2) Ext: 1 Progress Description: Calling equipment is non-ISDN. (3) ] [6c 0c 21 83 38 31 39 37 38 30 31 32 37 33] Calling Number (len=14) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) Presentation: Presentation allowed of network provided number (3) '8197801273' ] [70 0b a1 38 31 39 33 34 30 30 39 37 37] Called Number (len=13) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '8193400977' ] -- Making new call for cr 564 -- Processing Q.931 Call Setup -- Processing IE 4 (cs0, Bearer Capability) -- Processing IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) -- Processing IE 28 (cs0, Facility) Q.932 Interpretation component is not handled Handle Q.932 ROSE Invoke component [ Handling operation 0 ] Handle Name display operation Received caller name 'INFOFORTIN FAX' -- Processing IE 30 (cs0, Progress Indicator) -- Processing IE 108 (cs0, Calling Party Number) -- Processing IE 112 (cs0, Called Party Number) q931.c:3294 q931_receive: call 564 on channel 1 enters state 6 (Call Present) Sending Receiver Ready (110) [ 02 01 01 dc ] Supervisory frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 Zero: 0 S: 0 01: 1 [ RR (receive ready) ] N(R): 110 P/F: 0 0 bytes of data -- Restarting T203 counter -- Restarting T203 counter q931.c:2570 q931_call_proceeding: call 564 on channel 1 enters state 9 (Incoming Call Proceeding) [ 00 01 d6 dc 08 02 82 34 02 18 03 a9 83 81 ] Informational frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 N(S): 107 0: 0 N(R): 110 P: 0 10 bytes of data -- Restarting T203 counter Stopping T_203 timer Starting T_200 timer Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=10 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 564/0x234) (Terminator) Message type: CALL
RE: [asterisk-users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2
Hi, I'm having a similar problem, but the name isn't even appearing in debug output of PRI (see my other post about this). My PRI is with Telus, and they told me that NI-2 doesn't support CallerID name function, only NI-1. Andrew -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 17:03 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2 I there, I have some trouble to do working caller id name for outgoing calls on the PRI we just installed. Caller id name work on incoming calls only. Caller id number work on incoming and outgoing calls. The provider, Goup Telecom, said that's in what i'm sending. They said that I send the cid name in ascii code and to do it working, I need to send it in hex. So I take some traces but i'm unable to figure where is the problem. What I see In case that work: incoming call: [1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58] Facility (len=30, codeset=0) [ 0x9F, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x16, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0E, 'INFOFORTIN FAX' ] PROTOCOL 1F What I see in case that doesn't work: outgoing call: [28 05 b1 69 6e 66 6f] Display (len= 5) Charset: 31 [ info ] completes traces: working: [ 02 01 da d6 08 02 02 34 05 04 03 80 90 a2 18 03 a9 83 81 1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58 1e 02 82 83 6c 0c 21 83 38 31 39 37 38 30 31 32 37 33 70 0b a1 38 31 39 33 34 30 30 39 37 37 ] Informational frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 N(S): 109 0: 0 N(R): 107 P: 0 76 bytes of data -- ACKing all packets from 106 to (but not including) 107 -- Since there was nothing left, stopping T200 counter -- Stopping T203 counter since we got an ACK -- Nothing left, starting T203 counter Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=76 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 564/0x234) (Originator) Message type: SETUP (5) [04 03 80 90 a2] Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Speech (0) Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16) Ext: 1 User information layer 1: u-Law (34) [18 03 a9 83 81] Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit PRI Spare: 0 Exclusive Dchan: 0 ChanSel: Reserved Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 Ext: 1 Channel: 1 ] [1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58] Facility (len=30, codeset=0) [ 0x9F, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x16, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0E, 'INFOFORTIN FAX' ] PROTOCOL 1F 8B 0001 00 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [11]) A1 0016 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [1]) 02 0001 01 (INTEGER: 1) 02 0001 00 (INTEGER: 0) 80 000E 49 4E 46 4F 46 4F 52 54 49 4E 20 46 41 58 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [0]) [1e 02 82 83] Progress Indicator (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Public network serving the local user (2) Ext: 1 Progress Description: Calling equipment is non-ISDN. (3) ] [6c 0c 21 83 38 31 39 37 38 30 31 32 37 33] Calling Number (len=14) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) Presentation: Presentation allowed of network provided number (3) '8197801273' ] [70 0b a1 38 31 39 33 34 30 30 39 37 37] Called Number (len=13) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '8193400977' ] -- Making new call for cr 564 -- Processing Q.931 Call Setup -- Processing IE 4 (cs0, Bearer Capability) -- Processing IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) -- Processing IE 28 (cs0, Facility) Q.932 Interpretation component is not handled Handle Q.932 ROSE Invoke component [ Handling operation 0 ] Handle Name display operation Received caller name 'INFOFORTIN FAX' -- Processing IE 30 (cs0, Progress Indicator) -- Processing IE 108 (cs0, Calling Party Number) -- Processing IE 112 (cs0, Called Party Number) q931.c:3294 q931_receive: call 564 on channel 1 enters state 6 (Call Present) Sending Receiver Ready (110) [ 02 01 01 dc ] Supervisory frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 Zero: 0 S: 0 01: 1 [ RR (receive ready) ] N(R): 110 P/F: 0 0 bytes of data -- Restarting T203 counter -- Restarting T203 counter q931.c:2570 q931_call_proceeding: call 564 on channel 1 enters state 9 (Incoming Call Proceeding) [ 00 01 d6 dc 08 02 82 34 02 18 03 a9 83 81 ] Informational frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 N(S): 107 0: 0 N(R): 110 P: 0 10 bytes of data -- Restarting T203 counter Stopping T_203 timer Starting T_200
RE: [asterisk-users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2
Hi, You're right about what Telus said, this is written in the form that I received to get one but the tech at Group Telecom just respond to me in and say that this is supposed to work with NI2 with that structure: I 1C Standard Facility Length = 21 9F Serv Discrim Networking Extensions PDU Component Begins (hex) 8B0100A10F020101... Also, in that post http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-December/071501.html The guy seem to say that caller id name is working with NI-2 When I was in line with the tech of GT, I have also tried with 5ess and it wasn't working (sorry, no trace) Can you just past the url of your post about Telus? Thank you, LF Quoting Webster, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I'm having a similar problem, but the name isn't even appearing in debug output of PRI (see my other post about this). My PRI is with Telus, and they told me that NI-2 doesn't support CallerID name function, only NI-1. Andrew -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 17:03 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2 I there, I have some trouble to do working caller id name for outgoing calls on the PRI we just installed. Caller id name work on incoming calls only. Caller id number work on incoming and outgoing calls. The provider, Goup Telecom, said that's in what i'm sending. They said that I send the cid name in ascii code and to do it working, I need to send it in hex. So I take some traces but i'm unable to figure where is the problem. What I see In case that work: incoming call: [1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58] Facility (len=30, codeset=0) [ 0x9F, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x16, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0E, 'INFOFORTIN FAX' ] PROTOCOL 1F What I see in case that doesn't work: outgoing call: [28 05 b1 69 6e 66 6f] Display (len= 5) Charset: 31 [ info ] completes traces: working: [ 02 01 da d6 08 02 02 34 05 04 03 80 90 a2 18 03 a9 83 81 1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58 1e 02 82 83 6c 0c 21 83 38 31 39 37 38 30 31 32 37 33 70 0b a1 38 31 39 33 34 30 30 39 37 37 ] Informational frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 N(S): 109 0: 0 N(R): 107 P: 0 76 bytes of data -- ACKing all packets from 106 to (but not including) 107 -- Since there was nothing left, stopping T200 counter -- Stopping T203 counter since we got an ACK -- Nothing left, starting T203 counter Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=76 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 564/0x234) (Originator) Message type: SETUP (5) [04 03 80 90 a2] Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Speech (0) Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16) Ext: 1 User information layer 1: u-Law (34) [18 03 a9 83 81] Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit PRI Spare: 0 Exclusive Dchan: 0 ChanSel: Reserved Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 Ext: 1 Channel: 1 ] [1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58] Facility (len=30, codeset=0) [ 0x9F, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x16, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0E, 'INFOFORTIN FAX' ] PROTOCOL 1F 8B 0001 00 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [11]) A1 0016 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [1]) 02 0001 01 (INTEGER: 1) 02 0001 00 (INTEGER: 0) 80 000E 49 4E 46 4F 46 4F 52 54 49 4E 20 46 41 58 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [0]) [1e 02 82 83] Progress Indicator (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Public network serving the local user (2) Ext: 1 Progress Description: Calling equipment is non-ISDN. (3) ] [6c 0c 21 83 38 31 39 37 38 30 31 32 37 33] Calling Number (len=14) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) Presentation: Presentation allowed of network provided number (3) '8197801273' ] [70 0b a1 38 31 39 33 34 30 30 39 37 37] Called Number (len=13) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '8193400977' ] -- Making new call for cr 564 -- Processing Q.931 Call Setup -- Processing IE 4 (cs0, Bearer Capability) -- Processing IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) -- Processing IE 28 (cs0, Facility) Q.932 Interpretation component is not handled Handle Q.932 ROSE Invoke component [ Handling operation 0 ] Handle Name display operation Received caller name 'INFOFORTIN FAX' -- Processing IE 30 (cs0, Progress Indicator) -- Processing IE 108 (cs0, Calling Party Number) -- Processing IE 112 (cs0, Called Party Number) q931.c:3294 q931_receive: call 564 on
RE: [asterisk-users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2
I posted to Trixbox forum, since that is what I'm running, here's the URL: http://www.trixbox.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=11168forum= 4 Andrew -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 18:24 To: Webster, Andrew Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2 Hi, You're right about what Telus said, this is written in the form that I received to get one but the tech at Group Telecom just respond to me in and say that this is supposed to work with NI2 with that structure: I 1C Standard Facility Length = 21 9F Serv Discrim Networking Extensions PDU Component Begins (hex) 8B0100A10F020101... Also, in that post http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-December/071501.ht ml The guy seem to say that caller id name is working with NI-2 When I was in line with the tech of GT, I have also tried with 5ess and it wasn't working (sorry, no trace) Can you just past the url of your post about Telus? Thank you, LF Quoting Webster, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I'm having a similar problem, but the name isn't even appearing in debug output of PRI (see my other post about this). My PRI is with Telus, and they told me that NI-2 doesn't support CallerID name function, only NI-1. Andrew -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 17:03 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2 I there, I have some trouble to do working caller id name for outgoing calls on the PRI we just installed. Caller id name work on incoming calls only. Caller id number work on incoming and outgoing calls. The provider, Goup Telecom, said that's in what i'm sending. They said that I send the cid name in ascii code and to do it working, I need to send it in hex. So I take some traces but i'm unable to figure where is the problem. What I see In case that work: incoming call: [1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58] Facility (len=30, codeset=0) [ 0x9F, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x16, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0E, 'INFOFORTIN FAX' ] PROTOCOL 1F What I see in case that doesn't work: outgoing call: [28 05 b1 69 6e 66 6f] Display (len= 5) Charset: 31 [ info ] completes traces: working: [ 02 01 da d6 08 02 02 34 05 04 03 80 90 a2 18 03 a9 83 81 1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58 1e 02 82 83 6c 0c 21 83 38 31 39 37 38 30 31 32 37 33 70 0b a1 38 31 39 33 34 30 30 39 37 37 ] Informational frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 1 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 N(S): 109 0: 0 N(R): 107 P: 0 76 bytes of data -- ACKing all packets from 106 to (but not including) 107 -- Since there was nothing left, stopping T200 counter -- Stopping T203 counter since we got an ACK -- Nothing left, starting T203 counter Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=76 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 564/0x234) (Originator) Message type: SETUP (5) [04 03 80 90 a2] Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Speech (0) Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16) Ext: 1 User information layer 1: u-Law (34) [18 03 a9 83 81] Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit PRI Spare: 0 Exclusive Dchan: 0 ChanSel: Reserved Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 Ext: 1 Channel: 1 ] [1c 1c 9f 8b 01 00 a1 16 02 01 01 02 01 00 80 0e 49 4e 46 4f 46 4f 52 54 49 4e 20 46 41 58] Facility (len=30, codeset=0) [ 0x9F, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x16, 0x02, 0x01, 0x01, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0E, 'INFOFORTIN FAX' ] PROTOCOL 1F 8B 0001 00 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [11]) A1 0016 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [1]) 02 0001 01 (INTEGER: 1) 02 0001 00 (INTEGER: 0) 80 000E 49 4E 46 4F 46 4F 52 54 49 4E 20 46 41 58 (CONTEXT SPECIFIC [0]) [1e 02 82 83] Progress Indicator (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Public network serving the local user (2) Ext: 1 Progress Description: Calling equipment is non-ISDN. (3) ] [6c 0c 21 83 38 31 39 37 38 30 31 32 37 33] Calling Number (len=14) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) Presentation: Presentation allowed of network provided number (3) '8197801273' ] [70 0b a1 38 31 39 33 34 30 30 39 37 37] Called Number (len=13) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number
RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2.
Yep, on one of my NI2 PRI's I had to add a wait(1) before I answer, otherwise CallerIDName did not show 94.52% of the time. Seems like it might be a buglet, but it didn't seem worth looking into since the fix was so simple. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 2:19 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2. For callerid on NI2 don't you have to put a wait on there before you answer? Otherwise you miss the packet with the name in it? I think brc_ had this same problem.. exten = s,1,Wait(2) exten = s,2,Answer bkw -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Modesitt Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 12:50 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2. Included is my debug. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 11:57 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2. On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 10:52:07AM -0700, Chris Modesitt wrote: Okay, now I am really confused. I have two PRI's coming in from two different Carriers (QWEST and ELI), both of them are supposed to be setup to pass name and number on incoming calls. Problem that I am having is that I am not receiving inbound caller id name on either PRI, the only thing that both carriers have in common is that I am terminating into a DMS switch at the carrier. Observations: Caller ID Name dose not show up in the CDR records. PRI intense debug never sees the FACILITY IE message. Can you post the pri intense debug so that we can look at it? Matthew Fredrickson ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 10:02:46PM -0700, Chris Modesitt wrote: Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=42 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 852/0x354) (Originator) Message type: SETUP (5) [04 03 80 90 a2] Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Speech (0) Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16) Ext: 1 User information layer 1: u-Law (34) [18 03 a9 83 96] Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Exclusive Dchan: 0 ChanSel: Reserved Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 Ext: 1 Channel: 22 ] [6c 0c 21 83 38 30 31 37 38 37 34 39 30 36] Calling Number (len=14) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) Presentation: Presentation allowed of network provided number (3) '8017874906' ] [70 0b a1 38 30 31 34 33 37 37 38 36 30] Called Number (len=13) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '8014377860' ] -- Making new call for cr 852 -- Processing Q.931 Call Setup -- Processing IE 4 (cs0, Bearer Capability) -- Processing IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) -- Processing IE 108 (cs0, Calling Party Number) -- Processing IE 112 (cs0, Called Party Number) You are definitely not getting calling name over facility information element from your telco. I do not see calling name information anywhere in that dump. Unless that's not a complete dump, or there's some other problem, I'd talk to your telco about it. Matthew Fredrickson ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2.
You are definitely not getting calling name over facility information element from your telco. I do not see calling name information anywhere in that dump. Unless that's not a complete dump, or there's some other problem, I'd talk to your telco about it. Matthew Fredrickson Your right, after three hours the decided that they both (Qwest and ELI) were not sending the name via facility. I don't know how they were sending it but it is now working. :) Chris. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2.
Chris Modesitt wrote: Your right, after three hours the decided that they both (Qwest and ELI) were not sending the name via facility. I don't know how they were sending it but it is now working. :) Most likely they weren't. In my experience, ordering a PRI with NI-2 signaling is not enough, you have to specifically ask for Calling Name delivery, even though they don't charge for it. I suspect this is because if you don't ask, then they don't have to do the SS7 database dips to get the CNAM for your incoming calls, and that saves them $$$. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2.
Chris Modesitt wrote: Okay, now I am really confused. I have two PRI's coming in from two different Carriers (QWEST and ELI), both of them are supposed to be setup to pass name and number on incoming calls. Problem that I am having is that I am not receiving inbound caller id name on either PRI, the only thing that both carriers have in common is that I am terminating into a DMS switch at the carrier. immediate=yes would cause this. --Eric -- I am seeking part or full time employment in the Greater Toronto Area, My preference is part time employment with some telecommuting, but all offers will be considered. Contact eric at fnords.org. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2.
I checked that and I don't have it set, by default isn't it immediate=no? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Wieling aka ManxPower Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 11:28 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2. Chris Modesitt wrote: Okay, now I am really confused. I have two PRI's coming in from two different Carriers (QWEST and ELI), both of them are supposed to be setup to pass name and number on incoming calls. Problem that I am having is that I am not receiving inbound caller id name on either PRI, the only thing that both carriers have in common is that I am terminating into a DMS switch at the carrier. immediate=yes would cause this. --Eric -- I am seeking part or full time employment in the Greater Toronto Area, My preference is part time employment with some telecommuting, but all offers will be considered. Contact eric at fnords.org. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2.
Included is my debug. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 11:57 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2. On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 10:52:07AM -0700, Chris Modesitt wrote: Okay, now I am really confused. I have two PRI's coming in from two different Carriers (QWEST and ELI), both of them are supposed to be setup to pass name and number on incoming calls. Problem that I am having is that I am not receiving inbound caller id name on either PRI, the only thing that both carriers have in common is that I am terminating into a DMS switch at the carrier. Observations: Caller ID Name dose not show up in the CDR records. PRI intense debug never sees the FACILITY IE message. Can you post the pri intense debug so that we can look at it? Matthew Fredrickson ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Asterisk CVS-HEAD-11/19/04-04:29:22, Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Digium. Written by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Connected to Asterisk CVS-HEAD-11/19/04-04:29:22 currently running on voip-gw-provo1 (pid = 18928) Verbosity was 0 and is now 6 -- Executing Dial(Zap/38-1, SIP/TIETRUNK1/8014375007|300) in new stack -- Called TIETRUNK1/8014375007 -- Accepting call from '8013701119' to '8014375007' on channel 0/14, span 2 -- SIP/TIETRUNK1-6622 is ringing -- Executing Dial(Zap/37-1, SIP/TIETRUNK1/8012246050|300) in new stack -- Called TIETRUNK1/8012246050 -- Accepting call from '8014200568' to '8012246050' on channel 0/13, span 2 T203 counter expired, sending RR and scheduling T203 again Sending Receiver Ready (121) [ 00 01 01 f3 ] Supervisory frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 Zero: 0 S: 0 01: 1 [ RR (receive ready) ] N(R): 121 P/F: 1 0 bytes of data -- Restarting T203 counter voip-gw-provo1*CLI [ 00 01 01 69 ] Supervisory frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 Zero: 0 S: 0 01: 1 [ RR (receive ready) ] N(R): 052 P/F: 1 0 bytes of data -- ACKing all packets from 51 to (but not including) 52 -- Since there was nothing left, stopping T200 counter -- Stopping T203 counter since we got an ACK -- Nothing left, starting T203 counter -- Got RR response to our frame -- Restarting T203 counter -- SIP/TIETRUNK1-1e5f is making progress passing it to Zap/39-1 -- SIP/TIETRUNK1-20a7 is making progress passing it to Zap/37-1 -- Executing Dial(Zap/36-1, SIP/TIETRUNK1/8018020322|300) in new stack -- Called TIETRUNK1/8018020322 -- Accepting call from '8017967373' to '8018020322' on channel 0/12, span 2 -- SIP/TIETRUNK1-c1d8 is ringing -- Executing Dial(Zap/34-1, SIP/TIETRUNK1/8013758080|300) in new stack -- Called TIETRUNK1/8013758080 -- Accepting call from '8013755439' to '8013758080' on channel 0/10, span 2 -- SIP/TIETRUNK1-463e is ringing -- Executing Dial(Zap/33-1, SIP/TIETRUNK1/8013770070|300) in new stack -- Called TIETRUNK1/8013770070 -- Accepting call from '8018361924' to '8013770070' on channel 0/9, span 2 -- SIP/TIETRUNK1-d750 is ringing -- SIP/TIETRUNK1-6622 answered Zap/38-1 == Spawn extension (default, 8012246050, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/45-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/45-1' -- Hungup 'Zap/49-1' == Spawn extension (outbound, 8014927533, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/TIETRUNK1-77fa' -- SIP/TIETRUNK1-c1d8 answered Zap/36-1 -- Executing Dial(Zap/45-1, SIP/TIETRUNK1/8014187727|300) in new stack -- Called TIETRUNK1/8014187727 -- Accepting call from '8013701119' to '8014187727' on channel 0/21, span 2 -- SIP/TIETRUNK1-463e answered Zap/34-1 -- SIP/TIETRUNK1-b324 is ringing T203 counter expired, sending RR and scheduling T203 again Sending Receiver Ready (121) [ 00 01 01 f3 ] Supervisory frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 Zero: 0 S: 0 01: 1 [ RR (receive ready) ] N(R): 121 P/F: 1 0 bytes of data -- Restarting T203 counter voip-gw-provo1*CLI [ 00 01 01 69 ] Supervisory frame: SAPI: 00 C/R: 0 EA: 0 TEI: 000EA: 1 Zero: 0 S: 0 01: 1 [ RR (receive ready) ] N(R): 052 P/F: 1 0 bytes of data -- ACKing all packets from 51 to (but not including) 52 -- Since there was nothing left, stopping T200 counter -- Stopping T203 counter since we got an ACK -- Nothing left, starting T203 counter -- Got RR response to our frame -- Restarting T203 counter -- Executing Dial(SIP/TIETRUNK1-40a9, Zap/r1/8017057914|300) in new stack -- Called r1/8017057914 -- Zap/66-1 is ringing -- Channel 0/22, span 2 got hangup == Spawn extension
RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2.
For callerid on NI2 don't you have to put a wait on there before you answer? Otherwise you miss the packet with the name in it? I think brc_ had this same problem.. exten = s,1,Wait(2) exten = s,2,Answer bkw -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Modesitt Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 12:50 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2. Included is my debug. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 11:57 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2. On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 10:52:07AM -0700, Chris Modesitt wrote: Okay, now I am really confused. I have two PRI's coming in from two different Carriers (QWEST and ELI), both of them are supposed to be setup to pass name and number on incoming calls. Problem that I am having is that I am not receiving inbound caller id name on either PRI, the only thing that both carriers have in common is that I am terminating into a DMS switch at the carrier. Observations: Caller ID Name dose not show up in the CDR records. PRI intense debug never sees the FACILITY IE message. Can you post the pri intense debug so that we can look at it? Matthew Fredrickson ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:49:58AM -0700, Chris Modesitt wrote: Included is my debug. Caller ID Name dose not show up in the CDR records. PRI intense debug never sees the FACILITY IE message. Can you post the pri intense debug so that we can look at it? There was no SETUP message in that debug. You need to start the debug before you place your inbound call from the telco so that I can see the SETUP message that usually contains the IE that has this information in it. Matthew Fredrickson ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2.
There was no SETUP message in that debug. You need to start the debug before you place your inbound call from the telco so that I can see the SETUP message that usually contains the IE that has this information in it. Matthew Fredrickson Sorry Had the wrong debug options on, this shows all of the call setup. Thanks Again Chris. Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=42 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 852/0x354) (Originator) Message type: SETUP (5) [04 03 80 90 a2] Bearer Capability (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 Q.931 Std: 0 Info transfer capability: Speech (0) Ext: 1 Trans mode/rate: 64kbps, circuit-mode (16) Ext: 1 User information layer 1: u-Law (34) [18 03 a9 83 96] Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Exclusive Dchan: 0 ChanSel: Reserved Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 Ext: 1 Channel: 22 ] [6c 0c 21 83 38 30 31 37 38 37 34 39 30 36] Calling Number (len=14) [ Ext: 0 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) Presentation: Presentation allowed of network provided number (3) '8017874906' ] [70 0b a1 38 30 31 34 33 37 37 38 36 30] Called Number (len=13) [ Ext: 1 TON: National Number (2) NPI: ISDN/Telephony Numbering Plan (E.164/E.163) (1) '8014377860' ] -- Making new call for cr 852 -- Processing Q.931 Call Setup -- Processing IE 4 (cs0, Bearer Capability) -- Processing IE 24 (cs0, Channel Identification) -- Processing IE 108 (cs0, Calling Party Number) -- Processing IE 112 (cs0, Called Party Number) Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=10 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 852/0x354) (Terminator) Message type: CALL PROCEEDING (2) [18 03 a9 83 96] Channel ID (len= 5) [ Ext: 1 IntID: Implicit, PRI Spare: 0, Exclusive Dchan: 0 ChanSel: Reserved Ext: 1 Coding: 0 Number Specified Channel Type: 3 Ext: 1 Channel: 22 ] Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=9 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 852/0x354) (Terminator) Message type: ALERTING (1) [1e 02 81 88]CLI Progress Indicator (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Private network serving the local user (1) Ext: 1 Progress Description: Inband information or appropriate pattern now available. (8) ] Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=9 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 852/0x354) (Originator) Message type: DISCONNECT (69) [08 02 80 90] Cause (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: User (0) Ext: 1 Cause: Normal Clearing (16), class = Normal Event (1) ] -- Processing IE 8 (cs0, Cause) NEW_HANGUP DEBUG: Calling q931_hangup, ourstate Disconnect Indication, peerstate Disconnect Request Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=9 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 852/0x354) (Terminator) Message type: RELEASE (77) [08 02 81 90] Cause (len= 4) [ Ext: 1 Coding: CCITT (ITU) standard (0) 0: 0 Location: Private network serving the local user (1) Ext: 1 Cause: Normal Clearing (16), class = Normal Event (1) ] Protocol Discriminator: Q.931 (8) len=5 Call Ref: len= 2 (reference 852/0x354) (Originator) Message type: RELEASE COMPLETE (90)___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 10:52:07AM -0700, Chris Modesitt wrote: Okay, now I am really confused. I have two PRI's coming in from two different Carriers (QWEST and ELI), both of them are supposed to be setup to pass name and number on incoming calls. Problem that I am having is that I am not receiving inbound caller id name on either PRI, the only thing that both carriers have in common is that I am terminating into a DMS switch at the carrier. Observations: Caller ID Name dose not show up in the CDR records. PRI intense debug never sees the FACILITY IE message. Can you post the pri intense debug so that we can look at it? Matthew Fredrickson ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2.
Do you have immediate=yes for this type for setup? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 2:19 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2. For callerid on NI2 don't you have to put a wait on there before you answer? Otherwise you miss the packet with the name in it? I think brc_ had this same problem.. exten = s,1,Wait(2) exten = s,2,Answer bkw -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Modesitt Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 12:50 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2. Included is my debug. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 11:57 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] No Caller ID Name PRI NI2. On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 10:52:07AM -0700, Chris Modesitt wrote: Okay, now I am really confused. I have two PRI's coming in from two different Carriers (QWEST and ELI), both of them are supposed to be setup to pass name and number on incoming calls. Problem that I am having is that I am not receiving inbound caller id name on either PRI, the only thing that both carriers have in common is that I am terminating into a DMS switch at the carrier. Observations: Caller ID Name dose not show up in the CDR records. PRI intense debug never sees the FACILITY IE message. Can you post the pri intense debug so that we can look at it? Matthew Fredrickson ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
