[backstage] Programmes with audio description

2010-03-11 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Is it possible to filter /programmes for upcoming programmes with Audio
description? I'd like to try downloading the audio from recordings on my
Myth TV box for listening in the car. Of course, some programmes
probably work well as audio only without being specifically described,
so a list of programmes recommended for blind people might be a nice
alternative.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/policies/audiodescription/index.shtml
says From spring 2009 you will be able to check the Programmes website
to see whether a programme has audio description, but I can't see it
anywhere, and I certainly can't see how to filter by it.

Thanks,

Robert (Jamie) Munro



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [backstage] Clay Shirky: Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable

2009-03-16 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Kevin Anderson wrote:

 funding - the licence fee. Commercial newspapers are finding their
 readership and advertising decline. Unless the licence fee were extended
 to a public service newspaper (highly unlikely), the BBC doesn't provide
 that much of a model that could easily be transferred to newspapers.

I think that news.bbc.co.uk is already a public service newspaper -
albeit one without a print edition.

Robert (Jamie) Munro



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [backstage] The BBC as sheep... and irresponsible ones too

2009-02-26 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
David Greaves wrote:
 So here we are, a month after Which? gave out the same dumb advice the BBC 
 follows:
 
   http://news.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/hi/technology/newsid_791/7910045.stm
 
 Sensationalist pillock :)
 
 I can't wait for someone to be seriously hurt trying to drill through a hard 
 drive.
 
 FWIW:
   http://16systems.com/zero/index.html

I'm not an expert, but from my understanding of the theory, that
challenge isn't offering anything like enough money. $500 is less than
recovery companies charge for a normal recovery. I would have thought at
least $10,000 is more like what you would need to offer, maybe more.

You'd need something like a magnetic force microscope, and you'd need to
read the disk at many times higher resolution than the data was
initially recorded on it, so you'd need a large RAID array or something
to store your intermediate data. And it would probably take many days to
read.

Once you've read the drive, you'll probably need to go through several
rounds of writing some test data onto it and read it again in order to
work out the pattern that the drive writes it's data in. Each of these
will require even more massive amounts of time and storage. I suppose
you may be able to skip this if you have sufficent documentation from
the drive manufacturer, but I doubt it.

Robert (Jamie) Munro



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [backstage] Slightly bias view maybe?

2009-02-23 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Dave Crossland wrote:
 2009/2/23 Ian Forrester ian.forres...@bbc.co.uk:
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7899602.stm

 Via Glyn, just wondered what everyone else thought?
 
 Isn't this an old story? I thought the Ars Technica article from
 December was much better ;-)
 
 http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2008/12/uk-ignores-logic-backs-20-year-music-copyright-extension.ars
 
 I specially like this part

 Said the source: The 'creativity' argument is based on ignorance.
 There is nothing to stop a creative person using an old recording as part 
 of their work - as long as they do not release it.

 Like to see that stand up in court...
 
 Right - typical comment from someone whose understanding of
 copyright-law is for how it was pre-DRM-law.
 
 I liked this quote best:
 
 Some of them have no pensions and need this money, he said.

So do some people who aren't creative performers.

Perhaps builders who built buildings in the 1950s should be paid rights
on the labour they used to build the building as long as the buildings
still stand. Or Doctors whose patients continue to be alive.

Robert (Jamie) Munro



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [backstage] Slightly bias view maybe?

2009-02-23 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Dave Crossland wrote:
 2009/2/23 Robert (Jamie) Munro rjmu...@arjam.net:
 Some of them have no pensions and need this money, he said.
 Perhaps builders who built buildings in the 1950s should be paid rights
 on the labour they used to build the building as long as the buildings
 still stand. Or Doctors whose patients continue to be alive.
 
 Surely the comparison is with doctors who did the best they could but
 now their patients are dead, but they ought to be continually paid for
 the excellent job they did at the time?

Musicians are only continually paid if the track happened to be a hit
(or perhaps was used in a film or something) lots of music has been
recorded in the last 50 years that was just as good as music that became
a hit but it didn't become a hit due to the vagueness of the music
industry. The performers of this music won't get any benefit from term
extension.

Similarly Doctors and Builders should only be paid while their patients
are still alive or the buildings are still used, no matter how much
effort it took to treat the patient or build the building at the time.

:-)

Robert (Jamie) Munro



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-20 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Andrew Bowden wrote:
 I've just got Freesat HD, and it's amazing to see the best 
 picture quality that the BBC broadcast. But then they go and 
 spoil it with a DOG in the corner. It's almost worth 
 reverting to watching the program on BBC 1.
 If they must have a logo, do it with MHEG and enable the exit 
 button (like how it says Press Red).
 
 As a wise man once said to me - the problem with allowing you to turn
 such things off, is that people will switch them off!
 
 There's some stuff on the BBC Internet blog about BBC HD's DOG
 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/10/dogs_on_the_blog.html

Congratulations on not putting a DOG on BBC HD during the presidential
inauguration, even though there was one (saying LIVE Washington) on BBC
One! An unusual but welcome reversal.

It was a bit strange that at the end, when they showed a mini-highlights
of the day, it was not only SD, it was 4:3. Was that package provided by
the US network or something, where AFAIK, 16:9 always means HD?

Robert (Jamie) Munro

P.s. What would be handy is an also available on HD DOG on the SD
version of simulcasts. In fact, couldn't the MHEG program detect an HDTV
 receiver and switch channel automatically?




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-13 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Christopher Woods wrote:
 I've noticed that BBC One's online stream has a BBC One DOG on it, the same
 going for BBC Two. Isn't this one of the most impractical applications of a
 channel graphic ever? (and a waste of bits)

I've just got Freesat HD, and it's amazing to see the best picture
quality that the BBC broadcast. But then they go and spoil it with a DOG
in the corner. It's almost worth reverting to watching the program on BBC 1.

If they must have a logo, do it with MHEG and enable the exit button
(like how it says Press Red).

Robert (Jamie) Munro




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [backstage] DOGs on the BBC TV online streams?

2009-01-13 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Andrew Bowden wrote:
 I've just got Freesat HD, and it's amazing to see the best 
 picture quality that the BBC broadcast. But then they go and 
 spoil it with a DOG in the corner. It's almost worth 
 reverting to watching the program on BBC 1.
 If they must have a logo, do it with MHEG and enable the exit 
 button (like how it says Press Red).
 
 As a wise man once said to me - the problem with allowing you to turn
 such things off, is that people will switch them off!

But they are only on to aid changing channels. It would appear every
time to change channels to BBC HD until you press exit on your remote.
It could reappear during the continuity announcement between programmes
- I don't think most people would mind having to press exit once per
program.

 There's some stuff on the BBC Internet blog about BBC HD's DOG
 http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/10/dogs_on_the_blog.html
 
 But on a purely technical level, we wouldn't be able to use the same
 mechanism to provide the DOG as we use for the press RED on Sky and
 Virgin as, IIRC, you can only have one graphic up at a time, and that
 would mean we wouldn't be able to do press reds [1], or things like
 Press Green to set reminders.  And as the video comes from the same
 underlying data source for all four TV platforms, you couldn't easily
 make them turnoffable on Freesat and Freeview, and not on Sky and Virign

Just make it a single graphic that says:
+-+
| BBC HD|
|Press Red|
+-+

You could even be clever and have the first press of the exit key remove
the press red, and the second remove the whole thing.

Robert (Jamie) Munro



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [backstage] Your ideas are now finally welcomed

2009-01-08 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Matt Barber wrote:
 I used to like the way T4 would put T4: [show] at the start. That way,
 you could figure out what you wanted to watch. It would be good if Big
 Breakfast and such did that.

No, that's a truely utterly horrible thing to do. When searching by
showname in my PVR, if I want to find, for example, Friends, some non-T4
epsiodes are under F, others are under T. And the whole T section of my
PVR menu grows very big and unbalanced. Sometimes the same episode is
shown with both names, and it will record it twice thinking they are
different programs.

 Heh. The show-within-a-show problem that Children in Need presents
 crops up more often than you might imagine. I think kids tv shows,
 Comic Relief, and maybe T4 (?) and the old Big Breakfast show all do
 it. It always frustrates me when the TV listings have one big long
 show down in the schedule, but I only really wanted to watch a show
 within it.

Could you list multiple overlapping shows? So CIN is a program that
starts at 7pm and finishes at 12pm. Then there is a Doctor Who (CIN
episode) that starts at 8:15 and goes to to 8:30. Just ignore the fact
that they overlap.

Omnibuses could have the individual episodes they are composed of listed
in the same way.

Robert (Jamie) Munro



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [backstage] BNP mashups

2008-11-19 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Dave Crossland wrote:
 2008/11/19 Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 If you've not heard about the BNP member leak, you've obviously not reading 
 Techcrunch UK
 
 I have decided to take down the map
 
 Good.

IHMO, being a member of a political party (i.e. giving them money)
shouldn't be a private matter.

For example, all 300,000 Obama donors are listed here:
http://www.newsmeat.com/campaign_contributions_to_politicians/donor_list.php?candidate_id=P80003338

I do realise that there is an issue with the BNP and possibly some other
parties, where by being a member you are demonstrating yourself to be an
extremist, and opening yourself up to physical attacks from rival
extremists. I'm not sure how to deal with that.

Robert (Jamie) Munro

Ps. In the interests of full disclosure, I've been a member of the
Liberal Democrats for several years, not that I agree with everything
they have ever stood for.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[backstage] High Frame-Rate Television

2008-11-17 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
Brian Butterworth wrote:
 This one, can't go around praising a document and not linking to it,
 terrible form...
 
 http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp169.shtml

There was a cinema standard that called Showscan that ran at 60 instead
of 24fps for similar reasons. And IMAX do a thing called IMAX HD that
runs at 48fps. These systems both require a lot of lighting, and a lot
of film stock to shoot, so I don't think they are likely to be popular,
except in special cases like theme-park ride-films.

I wonder if highly shuttered video produces better results on TVs that
do motion compensated 100Hz stuff. E.g. if you delivered them 25p but
with the shutter open for 10ms rather than 40ms, they will be able to
make a much better job of the motion compensation, producing something
very close to true 100Hz video, but with no need for extra bandwidth or
changes to the transmission chain over what we have already. Should
broadcasters consider shooting with this kind of TV in mind?

Another thought I had was what about capturing motion separately to the
picture, at a lower spatial, but higher temporal resolution. Perhaps
using a strobed infra-red ilumination to generate smething like MPEG P 
B frames, and a full colour camera to generate I frames at a low frame rate.

Robert (Jamie) Munro



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature