Re: It's a boy!

2003-11-04 Thread Bryon Daly
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Matt Grimaldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Andrew Michael Grimaldi,
 Born 23-Oct-2003 at 6:52 p.m.
 10 lb., 8 oz. 20.5 inches

 Both baby and mother are doing well,
snip
Adding my congratulations, and wishes for a happy
homecoming.  :D
Congratulations to you and your family, Matt!  Welcome to the Brin-L new 
baby club!

-Bryon

_
MSN Messenger with backgrounds, emoticons and more. 
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_customize

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


A new trilogy

2003-11-04 Thread G. D. Akin
I just finished what I will call the Probablity trilogy by Nancy Kress.
The books are Probability Moon, Probability Sun, and Probability
Space.

The series revolves around a war between Humans and Fallers, a totally
alien race that takes no prisoners, doesn't communicate, and is described as
intensely xenophobic.  Add space tunnels that have been discovered here
and there about the galaxy, including one just beyong Neptune's orbit and
you have a way to travel.

Moon involves a mission to a planet called World.  World has one the
more interesting alien races I read about in quite a while.  It is DNA-based
and all members share reality. Worlders seem eager to befriend and trade
with humans, IF humans turn out to be real.  Orbitting World there are 7
moons, one of which is found to be an alien artifact apparently made by the
same Protector race that built the space tunnels.  The artifact may in
fact be a weapon that can turn the war in favor of humanity.  Moon flips
back and forth between members of an anthropological mission on the surface
of World and those who are part of a secret military mission sent to
decipher the artifact.  Naturally, the folks on the surface are aware of
neither the secret mission nor the artifact.

Sun is a re-visit to World by some returning members and a few new
characters.  The re-visit is in secret because first member mission left in
a hurry thinking humans had been declared unreal and in danger (among
other reasons).  BTW, there is a second artifact on World that may be a
smaller version of the one that was in orbit and may be the cause of the
Shared Reality of World.  Sun is mostly about the study of the second
artifact and the moral dilemma of taking (stealing) the artifact to use
against the Fallers and thereby destroying the shared reality civilization
of World.

Space is about the effects of the artifact and the resolution of the
Human/Faller war.  It also examines the political realities of the solar
system at the time.  There are return characters and new ones as well.
Anymore will spoil.  It is a solid conclusion.

This is an excellent read.  The books are well written, with logical plots,
and characters you can care about.

And one more thing: the physics.  If you've read Brian Greene's, The
Elegant Universe, then you're at least familiar with string theory, quantum
foam, 6 tiny curled up dimensions (Calabi-Yau spaces), and quantum
entanglement.  The science of this trilogy is right out of Greene's book
(Ms. Kress acknowledges his book right up front).  The space tunnels and the
artifacts and what they can do all involve string theory and Calabi-Yau
spaces.

Recommended.

George  A



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: religious/political question

2003-11-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 02:17 PM 11/3/03 -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: religious/political question
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:44:04 +
On 2 Nov 2003, at 4:54 pm, Julia Thompson wrote:



On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, William T Goodall wrote:

On 1 Nov 2003, at 9:38 pm, Jim Sharkey wrote:

The Fool wrote:
So when andrew crystal starts building concentration camps and
death camps, for atheists, freethinkers, and rationalists
SNIP further rantings

Considering that you have made it clear you would cheerfully eliminate
all religions if given your druthers, I find this over-the-top
hysteria pretty darn ironic.  Talk about double-speak.
The method religion has usually used to eliminate disagreement is to
eliminate those who disagree. The freethinker's approach to eliminating
religion is through information, debate and education.
Just as you don't convert many people to religion these days by telling
them to repent or they'll go to hell, telling them they're dead wrong and
idiots for believing in any sort of god isn't going to go over well,
either.
Debate doesn't mean slamming the opposite view and getting
hyperbolically hysterical.  *That* is the problem a number of folks here
are having with how The Fool is saying what he's saying.
I'd suggest that he re-think his debating tactics on this matter if he
wants to convert anyone to his point of view on it.
Well I think it is very generous of The Fool to try and help the 
memetically handicapped on the list with their affliction in the face of 
a notable lack of gratitude, or even downright hostility.
If you seriously think we should be grateful to you both for insulting the 
intelligence of list members and repeated smug declarations of intolerance 
toward their beliefs then y'all need to share whatever you're smoking with 
the rest of us.


None for me, thanks.  Smoking is against my religion . . .



-- Ronn!  :)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Costume Gets Osceola H.S. Student Suspended

2003-11-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 12:59 PM 11/3/03 -0600, The Fool wrote:
http://www.wftv.com/education/2604761/detail.html

Halloween Costume Gets Osceola H.S. Student Suspended

POSTED: 10:15 a.m. EST November 3, 2003
UPDATED: 10:56 a.m. EST November 3, 2003
KISSIMMEE, Fla. -- Osceola High School administrators thought a student's
Halloween costume was more trick than treat. So they suspended her.
 SURVEY
Do you agree with the high school's decision to suspend the student for
her halloween costume?
Yes, it was inappropriate
No, it was a good PSA


Results  |  Disclaimer

Lanessa Riobe, 16, was told to go home Friday after wearing a T-shirt
decorated with condoms. Lanessa said she decided on the costume after
seeing safe-sex commercials on television.
 Not strange enough? Read more strange news from WFTV.com.

A lot of my friends are sexually active, Riobe told the Orlando
Sentinel. I tell them, if you're going to do it, be safe.
Riobe taped condoms to a white T-shirt and began passing them out to her
classmates. Her first-period teacher alerted school administrators, who
sent her home with a three-day suspension for class disruption. They also
said she had an insolent attitude.
Osceola High principal Chuck Paradiso later reduced the suspension to one
day.
This is not acceptable, he said. This is something you don't do in a
public school.


Of course not.  She was infringing on the school's duty.



-- Ronn!  :)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: New Jersey (was Re: religious/political question)

2003-11-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 03:32 PM 11/3/03 -0600, Reggie Bautista wrote:
I wrote:
Someone else said once in the same newsgroup Of course, since
JMS is an atheist, he doesn't believe in hell, anyway.
jms' reply was Says you.  I'm FROM New Jersey
Jim replied:
Now, why does everyone have to crack on New Jersey?  There aren't that 
many areas in the world where you are always within three hours' drive of 
the ocean, mountains, and major metropolitan areas.

Yes, we have toxic waste and obnoxious IROC drivers, but otherwise it's 
not too bad a place.  Either that or I'm beyond help, which is not out of 
the realm of possibility.
Sorry, I didn't mean to start a debate about the relative merits of New 
Jersey.  I just
thought jms' line was funny in the context of the religion/anti-religion 
tirades going
back and forth.  I personally have nothing against New Jersey.

I was born and raised in Kansas (although I live in Missouri now), and 
have always
heard about how boring and how desparately flat it is, which I never 
really got
since the Kansas City area is quite hilly and interesting.

Then I drove to Colorado.  If most people's experience of Kansas is from 
driving
across I-70, then I think I get it now.


There's always I-80 across Nebraska and Wyoming¹ . . .

_
¹Which for me is shorter than I-70, though obviously YMMV, particularly if 
you are going to, say, Denver rather than Salt Lake . . .

-- Ronn!  :)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: DRAFT

2003-11-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 03:05 PM 11/3/03 -0600, Reggie Bautista wrote:
d.brin wrote:
But yes, a priority has to go to novels!  So, guess where I'll be
returning next?
Hint... they swim.  They talk.  They fly
Jim replied:
Glee!  It's a story about a bunch of Gameras!  :)
LOL!  By the way, has anyone else noticed that there are suddenly a whole lot
of Godzilla and related movies in the cheap DVD bins at Walmart?


Hadn't noticed those.  The night before the California election, though, I 
spotted a copy of Hercules in New York (supposedly with the original 
dialogue soundtrack) there . . .

Didn't Get It Because I Didn't Have A Player Available Maru

-- Ronn!  :)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: It's a boy!

2003-11-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 01:55 AM 11/4/03 -0500, Bryon Daly wrote:
From: Deborah Harrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Matt Grimaldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Andrew Michael Grimaldi,
 Born 23-Oct-2003 at 6:52 p.m.
 10 lb., 8 oz. 20.5 inches

 Both baby and mother are doing well,
snip
Adding my congratulations, and wishes for a happy
homecoming.  :D
Congratulations to you and your family, Matt!  Welcome to the Brin-L new 
baby club!


Oh, btw:  Me, too!



A Little Behind In My List Mail Maru



-- Ronn!  :)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Miranda died

2003-11-04 Thread Bryon Daly
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan went out to take some scraps out to the dogs, and Miranda didn't come.
He went looking for her and found her body next to the shed.
She was a very nice dog, very *doggy*, utterly adoring.  We're going to
miss her very much.
I'm sorry to hear about your dog, Julia.  My condolences.

_
Send a QuickGreet with MSN Messenger 
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_games

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Dogmatism

2003-11-04 Thread The Fool
 From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
 I just typed marx jewish question and got
 
 http://csf.colorado.edu/psn/marx/Archive/1844-JQ/
 
 let me quote from it.
 
 quote
 Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may
 exist. Money degrades all the gods of man -- and turns them into
 commodities. Money is the universal self-established value of all
things.
 It has, therefore, robbed the whole world -- both the world of men and
 nature -- of its specific value. Money is the estranged essence of
man's
 work and man's existence, and this alien essence dominates him, and he
 worships it.
 
 The god of the Jews has become secularized and has become the god of
the
 world. The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only
an
 illusory bill of exchange.
 
 The view of nature attained under the domination of private property
and
 money is a real contempt for, and practical debasement of, nature; in
the
 Jewish religion, nature exists, it is true, but it exists only in
 imagination.
 
 It is in this sense that [ in a 1524 pamphlet ] Thomas Munzer declares
it
 intolerable
 
 
 that all creatures have been turned into property, the fishes in the
 water, the birds in the air, the plants on the earth; the creatures,
too,
 must become free.
 
 Contempt for theory, art, history, and for man as an end in himself,
which
 is contained in an abstract form in the Jewish religion, is the real,
 conscious standpoint, the virtue of the man of money. The
species-relation
 itself, the relation between man and woman, etc., becomes an object of
 trade! The woman is bought and sold.
 The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of of the
 merchant, of the man of money in general.
 
 unquote

Replace the word jew with corporation, and he might eveb make sense:

 Money is the jealous god of Corporatism, in face of which no other god
may
 exist. Money degrades all the gods of man -- and turns them into
 commodities. Money is the universal self-established value of all
things.
 It has, therefore, robbed the whole world -- both the world of men and
 nature -- of its specific value. Money is the estranged essence of
man's
 work and man's existence, and this alien essence dominates him, and he
 worships it.
 
 The god of the corporations has become secularized and has become the
god of the
 world. The bill of exchange is the real god of the corporation. His god
is only an
 illusory bill of exchange.
 
 The view of nature attained under the domination of private property
and
 money is a real contempt for, and practical debasement of, nature; in
the
 corporate religion, nature exists, it is true, but it exists only in
 imagination.
 
 It is in this sense that [ in a 1524 pamphlet ] Thomas Munzer declares
it
 intolerable
 
 
 that all creatures have been turned into property, the fishes in the
 water, the birds in the air, the plants on the earth; the creatures,
too,
 must become free.
 
 Contempt for theory, art, history, and for man as an end in himself,
which
 is contained in an abstract form in the corporate religion, is the
real,
 conscious standpoint, the virtue of the man of money. The
species-relation
 itself, the relation between man and woman, etc., becomes an object of
 trade! The woman is bought and sold.
 The chimerical nationality of the corporation is the nationality of of
the
 merchant, of the man of money in general.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


california halts diebold Certification

2003-11-04 Thread The Fool
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,61068,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_5


Calif. Halts E-Vote Certification  


By Kim Zetter
05:49 PM Nov. 03, 2003 PT

SACRAMENTO, California -- Uncertified software may have been installed on
electronic voting machines used in one California county, according to
the secretary of state's office. 

Marc Carrel, assistant secretary of state for policy and planning, told
attendees Thursday at a panel on voting systems that California was
halting the certification process for new voting machines manufactured by
Diebold Election Systems. 


The reason, Carrel said, was that his office had recently received
disconcerting information that Diebold may have installed uncertified
software on its touch-screen machines used in one county. 

He did not say which county was involved. However, secretary of state
spokesman Douglas Stone later told Wired News that the county in question
is Alameda. 

Alameda County, a Democratic stronghold that includes the cities of
Berkeley and Oakland, converted to all-electronic voting last year at a
cost of more than $12 million. The county used the machines in state
elections last year and in last month's gubernatorial recall election.
The machines will also be used in tomorrow's municipal election in
Alameda. 

The only other California county currently using the Diebold touch-screen
machines is Plumas. No one was available for comment on whether
uncertified software may have been installed on machines used in Plumas. 

The Diebold machines slated for state certification, known as the
AccuVote TSx, are a modified version of the machines used in Alameda and
Plumas. The new machine is said to be a lighter, more compact version. 

At the meeting, Carel delayed indefinitely the certification of the new
machines until the secretary of state's office can investigate the
matter. 

Diebold officials, who were attending the meeting, seemed surprised by
the announcement and expressed displeasure to several panelists afterward
that it had been introduced in a public forum. They were unavailable for
comment. 

Also present at the meeting were representatives from Solano, San Diego
and San Joaquin counties, where officials are waiting for state
certification to begin using the new machines. 

Officials from Alameda County's registrar of voters were unavailable for
comment. 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


feel a draft coming on?

2003-11-04 Thread The Fool
http://www.defendamerica.mil/articles/sss092203.html

Become a Selective Service System Local Board Member 
 
The Selective Service System wants to hear from men and women in the
community who might be willing to serve as members of a local draft
board. 

Prospective Board Members must be citizens of the United States , at
least 18 years old, and registered with the Selective Service (if male).
Prospective Board Members may not be an employee of any law enforcement
occupation, not be an active or retired member of the Armed Forces, and
not have been convicted of any criminal offense.

Once identified as qualified candidates for appointment, prospective
Board Members are recommended by the Governor and appointed by the
Director of Selective Service, who acts on behalf of the President in
making appointments. Each new member receives 12 hours of initial
training after appointment, followed by 4 hours of annual training for as
long as he or she remains in the position. They may serve as Board
Members for up to 20 years, if desired.
 
 Local Board Members are uncompensated volunteers who play an important
community role closely connected with our Nation's defense. If a military
draft becomes necessary, approximately 2,000 Local and Appeal Boards
throughout America would decide which young men, who submit a claim,
receive deferments, postponements or exemptions from military service,
based on Federal guidelines.

Positions are available in many communities across the Nation. If you
believe you meet the standards for Selective Service Board Membership,
and wish to be considered for appointment please visit our web site at:
http://www.sss.gov/fslocal.htm
 
 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: religious/political question

2003-11-04 Thread Julia Thompson


On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

 At 04:04 PM 11/2/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
 
 
 On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
 
   At 10:50 AM 11/2/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
  
  
   [...] if a certain friend of mine
   had gotten pregnant (and she was doing everything she could to prevent
   it)
  
  
  
   Why do I get the impression that everything she could do did not
   include celibacy?
  
  
   Just Wondering Maru
 
 Actually, it did at that time.  That, *plus* birth control pills.
 
 But there was always the possibility of rape, which she was paranoid about
 at the time.  Something about having been molested by someone she trusted
 fairly recently at that time.  And she was concerned enough about it to
 talk to me about it all.
 
 
 
 Umm . . . I was being a smart aleck, expecting the answer to be that she 
 was already married at the time.  I did briefly consider the possibility 
 that she was single and paranoid about rape, but not in the sense that she 
 had any special _reason_ to be paranoid.  My problem is that I don't 
 usually think of such things:  I know that they happen, but they're just 
 not something that comes to mind first.  Or even second.

At the time that it was at all *my* problem for me to be taking any
action, she was married, but her husband was overseas in the military.  
So, you were right about assuming she was married, but at that particular
time, she wasn't having consentual sex.

 A couple of years later, the problem had corrected itself, and she has
 a daughter now.
 
 
 That is great!

She's a neat little kid.  :)

Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: religious/political question

2003-11-04 Thread Julia Thompson


On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, William T Goodall wrote:

 
 On 4 Nov 2003, at 3:04 am, Julia Thompson wrote:
 
  working very hard on tact for a number of years now -- how'm I doing?
 
 I think you may have confused tact with tactile on some occasions :)

:D  Thanks for the smile this morning -- I needed it.

Julia

1 depressed dog, 2 babies fussing on and off until after 2AM
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


[Scouted] Trick or Treat rage?

2003-11-04 Thread Jim Sharkey

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storycid=817e=2u=/ap/father_arrested

A snippet:
ANN ARBOR, Mich. - A 43-year-old man faces charges after he smashed a bird-feeder and 
threw a pumpkin through the window of a house where his young son said he didn't get 
any Halloween candy.

I'm starting to think that wwe need to implement the _Snow Crash_ method of justice 
and tattoo stuff on people's foreheads.

Jim

___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Dogmatism

2003-11-04 Thread Dan Minette

- Original Message - 
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: Dogmatism



 On 4 Nov 2003, at 3:29 am, Gautam Mukunda wrote:

  --- Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Wasn't Marx a Jew ethnically?
 
  His family converted.  It's certainly possible to be a
  self-hating Jew.

 But Marx was quite obviously ebulliently full of himself.

That can really be a very complex phenomenon. Gang members seem very full
of themselves, but are often plagued with self doubt and self hate at the
core. As I mentioned in my thread about my Zambian daughter, racist ideas
and stereotypes about blacks seem to have been accepted as true by a number
of blacks.


 
  Were his statements about the Jewish religion and not
  the Jewish people?
 
  One of the things that makes Judaism special is that
  you can't really distinguish the two.

 Conflating separable ideas leads to worthlessly muddled thinking.

Right, just like Maxwell muddled things beyond all hope when he combined
the separate ideas of electricity and magnetism. :-)

The reality is and has been that Jewish identity is complex. (As an aside,
I really don't see that utility of pristine theories that do not take the
messy realities into account).

As far as I see, Jewishness is three fold:

Its inherited, if your parents are Jewish you are Jewish.  (In particular,
if your mother is Jewish, you are Jewish.)

Its cultural.  One can accept or reject one's Jewish identity.  Rejection
has typically involved turning one's back on extended family and on one's
ancestors.

Its a religion. One accepts the Torah as uniquely revealed scripture and
follows the God of Abraham.
As far as the first question is concerned, there had been times when  Jews
were offered the opportunity to become full members of European society by
renouncing their heritage and becoming Christian.  I know that Teri's
father's family opted to become Christians in the 19th century.

Cultural Jews are very common today.  Many Jews are atheists but still
Jews.  They accept their identity, but don't believe in God.  Unlike Teri's
family, the still consider themselves Jewish.

Religious Jews believe in God and actively practice their faith.  Joe
Liberman would be a good example of this type of Jew.

Its hard to fathom On the Jewish Question as a discussion of a
theological problem.  Rather, Marx seems to accept as fact that the
inherent problem in Europe is Jewish in character.  I'd argue that his
point is that rejecting this Jewishness in order to accept Christianity, as
his father did, is not enough.  Christianity is too Jewish, one must reject
both Judaism and Christianity.

In doing so, Marx states a multitude of ethnic slurs as facts.  The fact
that he is biologically descended from Jew doesn't undo this.  I think it
is fair to say that he wasn't arguing that its a matter of biology, and
that a Jew who renounced his inherently evil heritage could be a perfectly
good Communist.  However, one cannot deny that the acceptance of
anti-Semitic stereotypes as fact is pervasive in the work.

The best explanation that I can give of 19th century European anti-Semitism
is that it was so pervasive, that it was accepted as fact even by those who
purport to differ with it.  So, it is hard to argue that the anti-Semitism
of Stalin and Lenin was an unnatural addition to Marxism, because it was
accepted in the earliest writings that underlie Marxism.  Rather, one could
argue that anti-Semitism so permeated Europe, that it was even accepted as
fact by people who's ancestors were Jewish.

Dan M.


  When he talks
  about the Jewish God being money he was trafficking in
  the vilest of anti-Semitic stereotypes.

 He was a Jew attacking the role of Jews in a Christian society wherein
 money-lending was still regarded as a sin and Jews were tolerated as
 they could perform the valuable service of giving loans with interest.
 The stereotypes he used were the ones of the society he lived in - and
 he was criticizing them.

Could you please show me where in the text that he said those stereotypes
were wrong?  The plain sense of the text is that he was accepting them as
valid.  Nowhere did he say that they were erroneous stereotypes.  Rather,
he stated the stereotypes as one would state facts.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: [Scouted] Trick or Treat rage?

2003-11-04 Thread Julia Thompson


On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Jim Sharkey wrote:

 I'm starting to think that wwe need to implement the _Snow Crash_ method
 of justice and tattoo stuff on people's foreheads.

I thought awhile back that if I were ever attacked and managed to knock my 
attacker down and unconscious for a bit, I'd use whatever I had at hand to 
carve an asterisk in the forehead of the person, then run and call the 
police.  The marring of the forehead would make for easier identification 
later, and might spur the person to go to the ER, where it might be easier 
to find that person.

Anyone who's read Vonnegut's _Breakfast of Champions_ ought to be able to 
figure it out

Julia

who'd be more inclined now to just land a number of kicks in the abdomen
and groin and then get the hell out of there...

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Red Hat Cans Linux Distribution

2003-11-04 Thread William T Goodall
'Leading Linux distributor Red Hat Inc. on Monday made clear its 
intention to focus on the enterprise space, telling customers that it 
will no longer be maintaining or releasing any of the its Red Hat Linux 
line after the end of April 2004.

The Raleigh, N.C. firm sent its Red Hat Network customers an e-mail, 
informing them of the upcoming discontinuation of Red Hat Linux and 
providing them with resources to assist you with your migration to 
another Red Hat solution.

As previously communicated, Red Hat will discontinue maintenance and 
errata support for Red Hat Linux 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 8.0 as of December 
31, 2003. Red Hat will discontinue maintenance and errata support for 
Red Hat 9 as of April 30 2004. Red Hat does not plan to release another 
product in the Red Hat Linux line, the email said.

The move is designed to push customers to migrate to Red Hat's 
Enterprise Linux line of products, which carry an annual subscription 
fee.'

--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
'The true sausage buff will sooner or later want his own meat
grinder.' -- Jack Schmidling ___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Red Hat Cans Linux Distribution

2003-11-04 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 4 Nov 2003 at 17:44, William T Goodall wrote:

 'Leading Linux distributor Red Hat Inc. on Monday made clear its
 intention to focus on the enterprise space, telling customers that it
 will no longer be maintaining or releasing any of the its Red Hat
 Linux line after the end of April 2004.

Link?

Ah well, I run SuSE anyway.

Andy
Dawn Falcon

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Dogmatism

2003-11-04 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dogmatism
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:11:38 -0600
- Original Message -
From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: Dogmatism

 On 4 Nov 2003, at 3:29 am, Gautam Mukunda wrote:

  --- Jan Coffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Wasn't Marx a Jew ethnically?
 
  His family converted.  It's certainly possible to be a
  self-hating Jew.

 But Marx was quite obviously ebulliently full of himself.
That can really be a very complex phenomenon. Gang members seem very full
of themselves, but are often plagued with self doubt and self hate at the
core. As I mentioned in my thread about my Zambian daughter, racist ideas
and stereotypes about blacks seem to have been accepted as true by a number
of blacks.
 
  Were his statements about the Jewish religion and not
  the Jewish people?
 
  One of the things that makes Judaism special is that
  you can't really distinguish the two.

 Conflating separable ideas leads to worthlessly muddled thinking.
Right, just like Maxwell muddled things beyond all hope when he combined
the separate ideas of electricity and magnetism. :-)
The reality is and has been that Jewish identity is complex. (As an aside,
I really don't see that utility of pristine theories that do not take the
messy realities into account).
As far as I see, Jewishness is three fold:

Its inherited, if your parents are Jewish you are Jewish.  (In particular,
if your mother is Jewish, you are Jewish.)
Its cultural.  One can accept or reject one's Jewish identity.  Rejection
has typically involved turning one's back on extended family and on one's
ancestors.
Interfaith marriage has complicated things even further.

Its a religion. One accepts the Torah as uniquely revealed scripture and
follows the God of Abraham.
As far as the first question is concerned, there had been times when  Jews
were offered the opportunity to become full members of European society by
renouncing their heritage and becoming Christian.  I know that Teri's
father's family opted to become Christians in the 19th century.
And this was historically almost always posed not as a 'choice', but an 
_ultimatum_: convert or die.  The Inquisition is but one example.

Cultural Jews are very common today.  Many Jews are atheists but still
Jews.  They accept their identity, but don't believe in God.  Unlike Teri's
family, the still consider themselves Jewish.
We've discussed this onlist before.  I have doubts that 'Cultural Jews' 
currently outnumber religious Jews.  In general, Jewish organizations and 
temples have been increasing their numbers quite steadily over the last 
decade.

Religious Jews believe in God and actively practice their faith.  Joe
Liberman would be a good example of this type of Jew.
You may consider this nitpicking, but for accuracy's sake I think it's best 
to break this down into specifics.  Joe Lieberman is an Orthodox Jew.  He 
belongs to the smallest, most traditional Jewish sect.  His example would be 
considered extreme by the vast majority of Reform and Conservative religious 
Jews in this country. Observant, religious Jews who practice their faith are 
not necessarily Orthodox.

There are three main sects (commonly referred to as movements) of Jewish 
faith:

Orthodox
Conservative
Reform
Orthodox is considered a traditional movement and Reform is a liberal 
movement.  Conservative is midway between the two.  The sects follow 
different laws and guidelines and individual levels of religious observance 
vary greatly within each.  For example, there are Conservative Jews who 
observe kosher laws and those who don't.  There are also sects within the 
sects: for instance, there are Traditional Orthodox, Modern Orthodox and 
Reconstructionist Reform Jews.  Try
http://www.nottm.edu.org.uk/ks3/jewfaq/movement.htm for more information.

Jon
GSV Brin-L Encyclopedia
Le Blog:  http://zarq.livejournal.com

_
Crave some Miles Davis or Grateful Dead?  Your old favorites are always 
playing on MSN Radio Plus. Trial month free! 
http://join.msn.com/?page=offers/premiumradio

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: feel a draft coming on?

2003-11-04 Thread Miller, Jeffrey


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Fool
 Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 06:59 AM
 To: Brin-L
 Subject: feel a draft coming on?
 
 
 http://www.defendamerica.mil/articles/sss092203.html

Hmm.. maybe I'll try to get a spot on the local draft board, just in case...

-j-
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Br!n: A review of The Life Eaters from CBG

2003-11-04 Thread Miller, Jeffrey


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Sharkey
 Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 04:57 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Br!n: A review of The Life Eaters from CBG
 
 
 
 Miller, Jeffrey wrote:
 Thanks for posting the review;  what did you think of Y:The Last
 Man, btw?
 
 I've been picking it up since you encouraged me to try it; 
 it's quite good, though I have yet to buy the first two 
 issues.  As a result, I have no idea how it all starts yet.  
 I'm just not willing to pay the ridiculously inflated prices 
 those issues are going for at the moment.  :(

I picked up the book of the first 8 issues;  I suffer from the collector gene (as is 
evidenced by my RPG and CD library..) and I've made a concious effort to NOT get into 
comics as collectibles.  Thus, I get the books ^_^

-j-
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: [Listref] House Cats and Ferrets Are Easily Infected With SARS Virus

2003-11-04 Thread Miller, Jeffrey


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Deborah Harrell
 Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 09:44 PM
 To: brinl
 Subject: [Listref] House Cats and Ferrets Are Easily Infected 
 With SARS Virus
 
 
 And here I thought my kitties just increased my risk
 of finding half-a-mouse on the doorstoop and the
 occasional hairball on a carpet...
 
http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/76/90032.htm?printing=true
...New research shows that common house pets such as
cats and ferrets may easily become infected with the
SARS virus and spread the disease to others.


Great, yet another reason I won't be able to get a ferret ^_^

-j-
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Red Hat Cans Linux Distribution

2003-11-04 Thread William T Goodall
On 4 Nov 2003, at 6:37 pm, Andrew Crystall wrote:

On 4 Nov 2003 at 17:44, William T Goodall wrote:

'Leading Linux distributor Red Hat Inc. on Monday made clear its
intention to focus on the enterprise space, telling customers that it
will no longer be maintaining or releasing any of the its Red Hat
Linux line after the end of April 2004.
Link?
Oops!

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1371219,00.asp

Ah well, I run SuSE anyway.
In that case you might find this interesting

http://www.novell.com/news/press/archive/2003/11/pr03069.html

Novell Announces Agreement to Acquire Leading Enterprise Linux 
Technology Company SUSE LINUX

--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
Misuse of IMPs leads to strange, difficult-to-diagnose bugs.
- Anguish et al. Cocoa Programming
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Red Hat Cans Linux Distribution

2003-11-04 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 4 Nov 2003 at 21:23, William T Goodall wrote:

  Ah well, I run SuSE anyway.
 
 In that case you might find this interesting
 
 http://www.novell.com/news/press/archive/2003/11/pr03069.html
 
 Novell Announces Agreement to Acquire Leading Enterprise Linux 
 Technology Company SUSE LINUX

Yea. They've stated that the desktop side won't be having any major 
changes allready. And if they DO...well. I'll stick with whatever 
distro the linux guru on my Uni degree uses, since he's allways 
teaching me Linux stuff.

(I have linux as a second OS on my desktop, and as the only OS on my 
old laptop. The pen tablet PC only supports Windows 95/98...)

Andy
Dawn Falcon

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread The Fool
And pharmacutical corporation are still evil greedy vile money moshiping
pig, only developing therapies they can patent.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/04/health/04CND-CHOL.html?ex=1068613200e
n=5509e0dc62883210ei=5062partner=GOOGLE

Study Finds New Drug Acts Quickly on Clogged Arteries By GINA KOLATA

Published: November 4, 2003


 small study of heart disease patients testing a hypothesis so improbable
that its principle investigator says he gave it a 1 in 10,000 chance of
succeeding has found that just a few treatments with an experimental drug
reversed what may be the equivalent of years' worth of plaque in coronary
arteries.

 
 
 
The results, published in the Journal of the American Medical
Association, involved just 47 heart attack patients. They were randomly
assigned to be infused with one of two concentrations of a substance that
mimics high-density lipoprotein, or H.D.L., the substance that removes
cholesterol from arteries, or to be infused with saline, serving as a
control. 

After five weekly infusions, those who got the experimental drug had a
4.2 percent decrease in the volume of plaque in their coronary arteries,
while those who had saline infusions had, if anything, a slight increase
in their plaque. By contrast, according to Dr. Steven E. Nissen, a
Cleveland Clinic cardiologist who directed the study, the most powerful
statins, which lower levels of low-density lipoproteins, or L.D.L., which
deliver cholesterol to coronary arteries, take years to show more modest
effects. 

``It is astonishing, you have to admit that,'' said Dr. Scott Grundy, a
cholesterol expert, who is director of the Center for Human Nutrition at
the University of Texas Southwestern School of Medicine in Dallas. ``A 4
percent reduction in the size of the lesions is remarkable.'' 

Dr. Daniel Rader, director of the preventive cardiology and lipid clinic
at the University of Pennsylvania, also expressed surprise. ``It is
amazing,'' he said. ``The biggest and by far the most surprising thing is
that it can happen so quickly. A weekly infusion? It is surprising enough
that it makes us all want to see it replicated in a larger study.'' 

Dr. Bryan Brewer, chief of the molecular disease branch at the National
Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, said, ``No one has ever seen anything
like this in this amount of time.'' 

``Hardening of the arteries takes years and years to develop,'' he
explained. ``It was thought that if we initiate therapy to decrease or
prevent it, it would probably take years to have an effect. We thought
H.D.L. therapy would work, but that it would work in six weeks was
something no one anticipated.'' 

But all the investigators urged caution. This was a single small study,
they emphasized. Its results need to be confirmed. And even if they are
confirmed, there needs to be large studies showing that the drug-induced
reduction in plaque corresponds to a reduced risk of heart attacks. 

Heart disease researchers have long wondered what would happen if they
increased people's H.D.L. levels. Many thought it would prevent heart
attacks because H.D.L. is associated with a reduced risk of heart disease
in epidemiological studies. 

But they were stymied in going farther. They knew how to treat L.D.L. and
so prevent cholesterol from being delivered to arteries. That was with
statins, drugs that lower L.D.L. levels and, studies showed, prevent
heart attacks. But they could not seem to increase the level of H.D.L. 

``We never had a therapy that was able to raise H.D.L. effectively,'' Dr.
Grundy noted. 

Companies tried, Dr. Rader said. ``The idea is to find a small molecule''
to activate the H.D.L. genes, he said. ``That's like a holy grail for the
pharmaceutical industry. It hasn't been found.'' 

A second but obvious choice would be to simply give people H.D.L.,
infusing it into their veins. But there was a problem. The idea of giving
ordinary H.D.L. was in the public domain and was not protected by patent,
and so companies were not interested. 

There was, however, one H.D.L. that had been patented, and Dr. Roger
Newton, the president and chief executive of Esperion Therapeutics, a
small company in Ann Arbor, licensed the rights to develop it. Dr. Newton
had experience in developing cholesterol drugs - he was a discoverer of
Lipitor, the most prescribed statin in the United States. His goal in
forming Esperion in 1998 was to develop H.D.L. therapies. The patented
H.D.L. had a long and romantic history, one, Dr. Rader said, that has
entered a realm of mythology. The story began two decades ago, when
Italian investigators reported that about 40 inhabitants of Limone sul
Garde, a small town in Northern Italy, had extraordinarily low H.D.L.
levels, so low that they were off the scale. Doctors expected that they
would have high rates of heart disease, but instead, it was reported,
they actually seemed to be protected from heart disease and to live
unusually long. 

``It was one of the strangest paradoxes of 

Xbox to Switch to PowerPC

2003-11-04 Thread William T Goodall
http://www.wired.com/news/games/0,2101,61065,00.html? 
tw=newsletter_topstories_html

Microsoft's next-generation Xbox will ditch its Intel chip in favor of  
the same kind of chip used in Apple's Macs -- an IBM PowerPC processor  
-- IBM and Microsoft announced on Monday.

At least one industry analyst thinks the choice may be the first crack  
in the so-called Wintel partnership that has dominated the computer  
industry for decades.
...
...Richard Doherty, research director of Envisioneering Group of  
Seaford, New York, said the announcement could be the first in a more  
general shift by Microsoft away from Intel.

It's a very big win for IBM. It's a clear change of direction for  
Microsoft, and it's a very unfortunate surprise for Intel, he said.

There's quite a bit of irony here, he added, referring to the fact  
that it has always been assumed that Apple would move to Intel, rather  
than Microsoft moving to the PowerPC, a chip technology co-developed by  
Apple, IBM and Motorola.
...
Doherty said IBM chips will now power all the major game consoles --  
the next-generation PlayStation will be based on IBM's The Cell, and  
Nintendo currently uses the PowerPC in the GameCube.

Microsoft will use the Virtual PC technology it acquired from Connectix  
last year to provide backward-compatibility with the current generation  
of Xbox games.
...
The new Microsoft is hardware-agnostic, he said. I think we will see  
Microsoft decided on chips on their merits now, rather than an aging  
bias.

--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that,
lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of
their C programs.  -- Robert Firth
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: [Scouted] Trick or Treat rage?

2003-11-04 Thread TomFODW
 I thought awhile back that if I were ever attacked and managed to knock my
 attacker down and unconscious for a bit, I'd use whatever I had at hand to
 carve an asterisk in the forehead of the person, then run and call the
 police.  The marring of the forehead would make for easier identification
 later, and might spur the person to go to the ER, where it might be easier
 to find that person.
 

I GUARANTEE you, the person would scream bloody murder to the cops and insist 
that you be arrested too. Then he'd hire a lawyer and sue you from here to 
Andromeda.

I'm not saying he'd be right to do this, but I absofuckinglutely guarantee it 
would happen. 100% certain.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last. - Dr Jerry Pournelle
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Dan Minette

- Original Message - 
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brin-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: new wonder drug scours arteries clean


 And pharmacutical corporation are still evil greedy vile money moshiping
 pig, only developing therapies they can patent.

You don't think you are evil, right Fool?

Dan M. 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread The Fool
 From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  And pharmacutical corporations are still evil greedy vile money
woshiping
  pigs, only developing therapies they can patent.
 
 You don't think you are evil, right Fool?

What is evil?  

These malicious corporations that could develop all kinds of medical
treatments, but instead only develop ones they can patent, are the true
essence of evil.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Dan Minette

- Original Message - 
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean


  From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   And pharmacutical corporations are still evil greedy vile money
 woshiping
   pigs, only developing therapies they can patent.
 
  You don't think you are evil, right Fool?

 What is evil?

 These malicious corporations that could develop all kinds of medical
 treatments, but instead only develop ones they can patent, are the true
 essence of evil.

Why don't you raise the money to develop one that other people will make a
ton of money on, leaving you broke?  Remember when you said people would
still develop things if they couldn't patent them?  Now are you saying they
won't because its evil?

Doesn't this just show that you are wrong about what would happen if
patents were abolished?

Out of curiosity, should other companies also give their products away to
poor people?

IMHO, what we see here is the tragedy of the commons.  I'm not opposed to
taxpayer money being used to develop unpatentable techniques, with the
government charging any company that uses these techniques a fee.  But, you
really can't expect a company to spend money developing something all of
its competitors will use for free.

Dan M.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Erik Reuter
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:44:35PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote:

 Remember when you said people would still develop things if they
 couldn't patent them?  Now are you saying they won't because its evil?

 Doesn't this just show that you are wrong about what would happen if
 patents were abolished?

Did he say that? I must have missed it.


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 17:09:03 -0600
 From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  And pharmacutical corporations are still evil greedy vile money
woshiping
  pigs, only developing therapies they can patent.

 You don't think you are evil, right Fool?
What is evil?

These malicious corporations that could develop all kinds of medical
treatments, but instead only develop ones they can patent, are the true
essence of evil.
And what's your point?  That they should pour billions of dollars into 
research, labs and basic research annually for purely altruistic reasons?  
That's either an incredibly optimistic or naive argument.

The most recent estimates indicate that it takes on average of $800 million 
and 15 years of research for a pharmaceutical company to develop a new drug. 
 Plus, almost 75% of potential drugs fail at some point during testing and 
that costs approximately 2 billion dollars annually.  Most of those failures 
are only discovered pretty late in the process, too, which means that said 
company has wasted time and money trying to develop a drug that isn't ever 
going to make them money.  For every 1000 drugs submitted to the FDA, do you 
know how many pass clinical trials?  One.  You do the math.

I do believe the price markup on drugs is WAY too damned high.  But imo, 
you'd have to be a fool to think they would do it out of the goodness of 
their hearts.  Even if they *wanted* to, it would be impossible.

Jon

Le Blog:  http://zarq.livejournal.com

_
Great deals on high-speed Internet access as low as $26.95.  
https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Xbox to Switch to PowerPC

2003-11-04 Thread Reggie Bautista
William T Goodall wrote:
http://www.wired.com/news/games/0,2101,61065,00.html? 
tw=newsletter_topstories_html

Microsoft's next-generation Xbox will ditch its Intel chip in favor of  
the same kind of chip used in Apple's Macs -- an IBM PowerPC processor  -- 
IBM and Microsoft announced on Monday.
Cool!  Thanks for posting this.  I have a bet to go collect on now... :-)

Reggie Bautista
Where Do I Send Your Cut? Maru
_
Great deals on high-speed Internet access as low as $26.95.  
https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Dan Minette

- Original Message - 
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:54 PM
Subject: Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean


 On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:44:35PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote:

  Remember when you said people would still develop things if they
  couldn't patent them?  Now are you saying they won't because its evil?
 
  Doesn't this just show that you are wrong about what would happen if
  patents were abolished?

 Did he say that? I must have missed it.

It's an old dispute between the Fool and myself that you may have chosen to
ignore.  I'm all but certain (would bet $100 but not my house)  that he has
stated that patents are evil and that things would be better if they were
eliminated. I'm pretty sure (bet $10 but not $100) that these discussions
occurred while you were onlist.

Dan M.

Dan M.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Erik Reuter
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:19:44PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote:

 It's an old dispute between the Fool and myself that you may have
 chosen to ignore.  I'm all but certain (would bet $100 but not my
 house) that he has stated that patents are evil and that things would
 be better if they were eliminated. I'm pretty sure (bet $10 but not
 $100) that these discussions occurred while you were onlist.

The reason I ask is because, as stated by you, that position is similar
to mine. I'm not that extreme, but I do think (and have stated) that the
patent system is way out of control now and that far too many patents
are granted, and often should not have been granted (should as in,
using the current standards properly if the examiner had done adequate
research), and are virtually always for too long a term. I think the
system would work much better if as few as 10% as many patents were
granted as are now, and if the terms averaged less than 5 years (perhaps
variable terms depending on the item and the quality of the invention).

I also agree with the statement that people would still develop many
things without IP protection. They already do, and in some areas I think
government or educational institutions would actually be more efficient,
in terms of using available resources and creating beneficial advances
for everyone, than the current state of affairs. Some, but not all.


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Jon Gabriel
Oops.

And what's your point?  That they should pour billions of dollars into 
research, labs and basic research annually for purely
That should be ...salaries, labs and basic research...

Jon
i think faster than i type maru


Le Blog:  http://zarq.livejournal.com

_
Great deals on high-speed Internet access as low as $26.95.  
https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 19:24:18 -0500
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:19:44PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote:

 It's an old dispute between the Fool and myself that you may have
 chosen to ignore.  I'm all but certain (would bet $100 but not my
 house) that he has stated that patents are evil and that things would
 be better if they were eliminated. I'm pretty sure (bet $10 but not
 $100) that these discussions occurred while you were onlist.
The reason I ask is because, as stated by you, that position is similar
to mine.
Out of curiosity, how do you feel about copyright laws?

Jon

Le Blog: http://zarq.livejournal.com

_
Send a QuickGreet with MSN Messenger 
http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_games

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Erik Reuter
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:39:27PM -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:

 Out of curiosity, how do you feel about copyright laws?

Similarly. Monopoly rights should not outlast the life of the original
creator of the copyrighted material.  They should definitely not
be retroactively extended which is just silly and obviously in
contradiction to the U.S. Constitution. I would like to see the system
move towards eliminating many copyright protections and instead move
towards a subscription and/or large payment for early purchasers model.


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Red Hat Cans Linux Distribution

2003-11-04 Thread Alberto Monteiro

Andrew Crystall wrote:


 (I have linux as a second OS on my desktop, and as the
 only OS on my old laptop. The pen tablet PC only
 supports Windows 95/98...)

I have put Linux in my new computer - it's been a war to make
things work. On Sunday I spend 4 hours battling with the
sound system, and on Monday I though I had finally conquered
the enemy's stronghold. One boot to Linux by my almost-4
years old son, and now the sound system went back to
the Rebel Cause - and now it seems unassailable by My
Legions of Terror.

Linux suckz.

Even the alleged stability is false: today I lost a (small) file
that I was typing :-/

Alberto Monteiro


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Red Hat Cans Linux Distribution

2003-11-04 Thread Erik Reuter
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:44:08PM -, Alberto Monteiro wrote:

 Even the alleged stability is false:

That is false.


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Dan Minette

- Original Message - 
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean


 On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:19:44PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote:

  It's an old dispute between the Fool and myself that you may have
  chosen to ignore.  I'm all but certain (would bet $100 but not my
  house) that he has stated that patents are evil and that things would
  be better if they were eliminated. I'm pretty sure (bet $10 but not
  $100) that these discussions occurred while you were onlist.

 The reason I ask is because, as stated by you, that position is similar
 to mine. I'm not that extreme, but I do think (and have stated) that the
 patent system is way out of control now and that far too many patents
 are granted, and often should not have been granted (should as in,
 using the current standards properly if the examiner had done adequate
 research), and are virtually always for too long a term. I think the
 system would work much better if as few as 10% as many patents were
 granted as are now, and if the terms averaged less than 5 years (perhaps
 variable terms depending on the item and the quality of the invention).

I'm not going to argue that the present system is wonderful, but I see
different problems.  The core problem is that examiners do not have
ordinary skill in the art.They do grant invalid patents, and they also gut
valid patents. I've seen the companies with the best lawyers get payments
for patents that their own earlier disclosers invalidated and find ways to
pick the language apart in valid patents of new ideas to the point where
someone who doesn't know what's going on.

As far as 5 years go; in the industries that I am familiar with, five years
is a short time for patents.  It probably takes at least a couple of years
to develop, and that just leaves about 3 years of coverage.  Remember, the
patent application must be made before any disclosure of the ideas in the
patent or the first commercial use.

 I also agree with the statement that people would still develop many
 things without IP protection.

But not things with high NRE associated with development.  If a lead of a
few years on the competition is all it takes, and if there is not a big
advantage in just copying a technique, then you are right.  But if your
competitors can have, say, 10% lower costs by just copying, then why bother
developing first?

Drugs are a classic example of this.  Once a drug has passed clinical
trials, the cost of copying is much smaller than the cost of development.
Further, there's no risk in copying.

 They already do, and in some areas I think
 government or educational institutions would actually be more efficient,
 in terms of using available resources and creating beneficial advances
 for everyone, than the current state of affairs. Some, but not all.

The problem that I see with that is that it tends to put tremendous power
in the hands of the wise committee and eliminates risk taking.  I've got
friends who work at small start ups working on an AIDS drug.  The present
model allows them to take a significant risk of failure, knowing that the
payoff for success will pay for it.

Dan M.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: [Listref] House Cats and Ferrets Are Easily Infected With SARS Virus

2003-11-04 Thread Gary Nunn

...New research shows that common house pets such as
cats and ferrets may easily become infected with the
SARS virus and spread the disease to others.

I will have to crack down and keep my cat out of China and Toronto :-)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: [Listref] House Cats and Ferrets Are Easily Infected With SARSVirus

2003-11-04 Thread Robert Seeberger

- Original Message - 
From: Gary Nunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Killer Bs Discussion' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:16 PM
Subject: RE: [Listref] House Cats and Ferrets Are Easily Infected With
SARSVirus



 ...New research shows that common house pets such as
 cats and ferrets may easily become infected with the
 SARS virus and spread the disease to others.

 I will have to crack down and keep my cat out of China and Toronto :-)



Stay off the hutch or its no more Lone Ranger for you Felix!


xponent
Ronns Schtick Maru
rob


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 4 Nov 2003 at 17:09, The Fool wrote:

  From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   And pharmacutical corporations are still evil greedy vile money
 woshiping
   pigs, only developing therapies they can patent.
  
  You don't think you are evil, right Fool?
 
 What is evil?  
 
 These malicious corporations that could develop all kinds of medical
 treatments, but instead only develop ones they can patent, are the
 true essence of evil.

If they can't make money on it, then they won't be arround to MAKE 
the next generation of treatments, ANY treatments.

Don't blame the companies, blame Patent laws. Especially US patent 
laws.

Andy
Dawn Falcon

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Erik Reuter
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:23:58PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote:
 
 From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  variable terms depending on the item and the quality of the invention).


 As far as 5 years go; in the industries that I am familiar with, five years
 is a short time for patents.  It probably takes at least a couple of years
 to develop, and that just leaves about 3 years of coverage.  Remember, the
 patent application must be made before any disclosure of the ideas in the
 patent or the first commercial use.

 But not things with high NRE associated with development.  If a lead of a

Yes, things with high NRE. How about (D)ARPANET?

 Drugs are a classic example of this.  Once a drug has passed clinical
 trials, the cost of copying is much smaller than the cost of
 development.  Further, there's no risk in copying.

Is there risk in searching for cancer cures? I suppose NIH doesn't take
any risks with their billions of $$ spent ?


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Continuing Education

2003-11-04 Thread Robert Seeberger
http://www.csi.edu/ip/ce/yesology/

The power of devotion.G


xponent
Amazed Maru
rob


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Julia Thompson


On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Erik Reuter wrote:

 On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:23:58PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote:
 
  Drugs are a classic example of this.  Once a drug has passed clinical
  trials, the cost of copying is much smaller than the cost of
  development.  Further, there's no risk in copying.
 
 Is there risk in searching for cancer cures? I suppose NIH doesn't take
 any risks with their billions of $$ spent ?

NIH is funded by the government, it is *not* a corporation.  (And they 
had a decent pension plan awhile back, don't know what it's like now.)

Maybe the US government should be involved in drug research, then?  
Because either a corporation is doing the research or the government is.  
(If there's another alternative I'm overlooking, please mention it.)

And they've been involved in trying to find cancer cures for a good number 
of years -- I remember stories about my grandmother dealing with rats in 
the 1950s -- and they haven't come up with much of a *cure* yet.  They do 
know more about cancer, though.

Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Erik Reuter
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:18:49PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:

 NIH is funded by the government, it is *not* a corporation.

News flash from Julia!


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Robert Seeberger

- Original Message - 
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean


 On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:18:49PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:

  NIH is funded by the government, it is *not* a corporation.

 News flash from Julia!


Ass flash from Erik!





xponent
Headlines Maru
rob


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Erik Reuter
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:57:09PM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:

 Ass flash from Erik!

Butt in from Rob!


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Reggie Bautista
Erik wrote:
 News flash from Julia!
rob replied:
Ass flash from Erik!
The flashers on my car went out today.  Just thought I'd toss that in there.

Reggie Bautista

_
MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays!  Snappier product search... 
http://shopping.msn.com

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Robert Seeberger

- Original Message - 
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:15 PM
Subject: Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean


 On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:57:09PM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:

  Ass flash from Erik!

 Butt in from Rob!


Yikes!
Now he's turned around and revealed his shortcomings!


xponent
Back At Ya Maru
rob


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: new wonder drug scours arteries clean

2003-11-04 Thread Andrew Crystall
On 4 Nov 2003 at 18:57, Jon Gabriel wrote:

 I do believe the price markup on drugs is WAY too damned high.  But
 imo, you'd have to be a fool to think they would do it out of the
 goodness of their hearts.  Even if they *wanted* to, it would be
 impossible.

Agreed. That doesn't make the current situation with patent laws less 
broken or in need of reform, however.

Andy
Dawn Falcon

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l