Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Martha Edwards]

I'm definitely in favor of one list, and yes, list-serve ettiquette demands
deleting everything except what is relevant to your post.  Also,
remembering to make the subject line actually reflect the discussion is
key, although I'm not really happy to see discussions bifurcated when
someone makes a small change to the subject line.

Perhaps what could help is a code word in the subject - like a tag -
"newdance", say, or "choreo" or whatever. Those of us who use email
filtering could then use our email settings to automatically delete the
posts in question, or, like me, automatically file them in a special folder
for later viewing.

M
E


On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Paul Wilde  wrote:

> I totally agree w/ Chrissy, John, & Hilton,
>
> Please delete everything that has already been posted which is not
> absolutely essential to your new post.
>
> Thank you everyone,
> Paul
> ___
> Callers mailing list
> call...@sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>



-- 
As you set out for Ithaka, pray that your journey be long, full of
adventure, full of discovery...
May there be many summer mornings when, with what pleasure, with what joy,
you enter harbors you're seeing for the first time.
~Constantine Cavafy, "Ithaka" 1911

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Paul Wilde]

I totally agree w/ Chrissy, John, & Hilton,

Please delete everything that has already been posted which is not
absolutely essential to your new post.

Thank you everyone,
Paul

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Laur]

here here!!!

Laurie 

--- On Thu, 5/10/12, Hilton Baxter  wrote:

> From: Hilton Baxter 
> Date: Thursday, May 10, 2012, 1:49 PM
> I agree with the comments of John
> Sweeney (copied below - after deleting unneeded material).
> 
> Hilton Baxter
> 607  651-8768
> 
<>

> > By, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, reducing the SIZE of them.
> > Too many people just do a "Reply", type what they want,
> and then press
> > "Send".
> > 
> > There is one other crucial step.  Before pressing
> "Send" check what it
> > is that you are sending and delete all the material
> that is not required
> > or not relevant.>               

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Hilton Baxter]

I agree with the comments of John Sweeney (copied below - after deleting 
unneeded material).

Hilton Baxter
607  651-8768


> I would rather have a single list.
> 
> I would also love to cut down on volume.
> But not by reducing the number of posts.
> By, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, reducing the SIZE of them.
> Too many people just do a "Reply", type what they want, and then press
> "Send".
> 
> There is one other crucial step.  Before pressing "Send" check what it
> is that you are sending and delete all the material that is not required
> or not relevant.
> 
>Happy dancing,
>   John

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Chrissy Fowler]

AMEN to what John said below.  Especially the last sentence.

If you are a person who habitually sends the entire history at the end of your 
SW posts, and there's no compelling reason for you to include all those lines, 
PLEASE consider taking a few seconds to only include the relevant parts - for 
the benefit of your fellow list-mates.  

Cheers,
Chrissy Fowler
Belfast

(PS I almost sent an apology to the list when my fingers flew too fast the 
other day and I
 sent a reply with the whole giant digest history appended.  But then I 
decided that would mean sending a non-essential email.)  



>  
> I would also love to cut down on volume.
>  
> But not by reducing the number of posts.
>  
> By, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, reducing the SIZE of them.
>  
> Too many people just do a "Reply", type what they want, and then press
> "Send".
>  
> There is one other crucial step.  Before pressing "Send" check what it
> is that you are sending and delete all the material that is not required
> or not relevant.
>  
> Happy dancing,
>John

  

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Donald Perley]

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Lindsay Morris  wrote:
> I'd vote for one list. Easy enough to search for the title if a dance there.

Only if you know the title.  Wouldn't work if you just want to browse
for dances.

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Donald Perley]

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Chris Weiler (home)
 wrote:

> So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_
> subscribe to a choreography list?

One advantage of a separate list is it would be easier if one is
searching the archives for dances.

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Susan Moffett]

Too much volume! The discussions are mostly useful to me although I  
don't participate a lot. But so much traffic lately is just  
overwhelming.


Thanks!
On May 9, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Chris Weiler (home) wrote:


Hello SW callers,

I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about  
starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all  
callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the  
same list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the  
callers list volume is getting too heavy for some people.


So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_  
subscribe to a choreography list?


Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think  
that the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it  
divided into two lists to increase the signal to noise ratio?


Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's  
just lurking.


Chris Weiler
Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
Craftsbury, VT


___
Callers mailing list
call...@sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[John Sweeney]

I would rather have a single list.

I would also love to cut down on volume.

But not by reducing the number of posts.

By, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, reducing the SIZE of them.

Too many people just do a "Reply", type what they want, and then press
"Send".

There is one other crucial step.  Before pressing "Send" check what it
is that you are sending and delete all the material that is not required
or not relevant.

Happy dancing,
   John

John Sweeney, Dancer, England   j...@modernjive.com 01233 625 362 &
07802 940 574
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk   for
Dancing in Kent

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Laur]

A good alternative.

Laurie
West MI


--- On Wed, 5/9/12, Andrea Nettleton <twirly-g...@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> From: Andrea Nettleton <twirly-g...@bellsouth.net>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume
> To: "Caller's discussion list" <call...@sharedweight.net>
> Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 5:33 PM
> One method of having one list, but
> keeping the new dance discussions sorted is the old OT
> trick, but instead of OT we would use ND (New Dance), or
> some other designator, as a preface to the name of the dance
> under discussion.  That being the subject of the email,
> anyone not interested could simply delete.  
> Andrea
> PS. I would be more likely to participate or at least follow
> if such discussions remained on this list.  
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On May 9, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Bob Green <bobgr...@swbell.net>
> wrote:
> 
> > If we are going to post and vet new dances, I am quite
> certain a separate
> > list would be preferable. Our little caller's group
> here in Missouri would
> > alone double the word volume of the current list. While
> the total volume
> > would be the same, I think there would be distinct
> advantages to having the
> > dances presorted out from the other topics. I would
> most certainly
> > subscribe to both lists if it were done.
> > 
> > Thanks for all you do Chris!
> > 
> > Bob
> > 
> > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Chris Weiler (home)
> <
> > chris.wei...@weirdtable.org>
> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hello SW callers,
> >> 
> >> I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the
> discussion about
> >> starting a new choreography list. My thought is
> that most if not all
> >> callers would want to be on both lists, so why not
> have them be the same
> >> list? My only answer that I could think of why not
> is if the callers list
> >> volume is getting too heavy for some people.
> >> 
> >> So I would like to know is if there are many people
> who would _not_
> >> subscribe to a choreography list?
> >> 
> >> Also, what do you think of the traffic volume
> lately? If you think that
> >> the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather
> have it divided into two
> >> lists to increase the signal to noise ratio?
> >> 
> >> Thanks to everyone for your interest and
> participation, even if it's just
> >> lurking.
> >> 
> >> Chris Weiler
> >> Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
> >> Craftsbury, VT
> >> 
> >> 
> >> __**_
> >> Callers mailing list
> >> call...@sharedweight.net
> >> http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers>
> >> 
> > ___
> > Callers mailing list
> > call...@sharedweight.net
> > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> ___
> Callers mailing list
> call...@sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Chris Lahey]

I would subscribe to the new list and would be fine with keeping them
together or separate, I don't really care.

I would like to know what the WebContent list is.  I'm unfamiliar with
that list.

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Laur <lc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I echo Bob's sentiment.
>
> Laurie
> West MI
>
>
> --- On Wed, 5/9/12, Bob Green <bobgr...@swbell.net> wrote:
>
>> From: Bob Green <bobgr...@swbell.net>
>> Subject: Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume
>> To: "Caller's discussion list" <call...@sharedweight.net>
>> Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 4:16 PM
>> If we are going to post and vet new
>> dances, I am quite certain a separate
>> list would be preferable. Our little caller's group here in
>> Missouri would
>> alone double the word volume of the current list. While the
>> total volume
>> would be the same, I think there would be distinct
>> advantages to having the
>> dances presorted out from the other topics. I would most
>> certainly
>> subscribe to both lists if it were done.
>>
>> Thanks for all you do Chris!
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Chris Weiler (home) <
>> chris.wei...@weirdtable.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello SW callers,
>> >
>> > I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the
>> discussion about
>> > starting a new choreography list. My thought is that
>> most if not all
>> > callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have
>> them be the same
>> > list? My only answer that I could think of why not is
>> if the callers list
>> > volume is getting too heavy for some people.
>> >
>> > So I would like to know is if there are many people who
>> would _not_
>> > subscribe to a choreography list?
>> >
>> > Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately?
>> If you think that
>> > the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have
>> it divided into two
>> > lists to increase the signal to noise ratio?
>> >
>> > Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation,
>> even if it's just
>> > lurking.
>> >
>> > Chris Weiler
>> > Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
>> > Craftsbury, VT
>> >
>> >
>> > __**_
>> > Callers mailing list
>> > call...@sharedweight.net
>> > http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers>
>> >
>> ___
>> Callers mailing list
>> call...@sharedweight.net
>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>>
> ___
> Callers mailing list
> call...@sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Michael Barraclough]

My web site is a haven for people to publish their dances and also has a
comment feature.

Michael Barraclough
www.michaelbarraclough.com



On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 15:56 -0400, Janet Bertog wrote:
> I was wondering if there would be some way that a website could be set up
> where new dances could be posted that people could go to.  That could keep
> the traffic on the list down.  The problem that I see with that is that
> people wouldn't be able to discuss the dances as easily, or if they did the
> dance and discussion would end up on the list anyway.  
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: callers-boun...@sharedweight.net
> [mailto:callers-boun...@sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Mortland, Jo
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:46 PM
> To: Caller's discussion list
> Cc: Shared Weight
> Subject: Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume
> 
> I would rather have two lists.
> 
> Jo  Mortland
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On May 9, 2012, at 2:23 PM, "Chris Weiler (home)"
> <chris.wei...@weirdtable.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hello SW callers,
> > 
> > I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about 
> > starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all 
> > callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the 
> > same list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the 
> > callers list volume is getting too heavy for some people.
> > 
> > So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_ 
> > subscribe to a choreography list?
> > 
> > Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think 
> > that the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it divided 
> > into two lists to increase the signal to noise ratio?
> > 
> > Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's 
> > just lurking.
> > 
> > Chris Weiler
> > Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
> > Craftsbury, VT
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Callers mailing list
> > call...@sharedweight.net
> > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> ___
> Callers mailing list
> call...@sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> 
> ___
> Callers mailing list
> call...@sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Andrea Nettleton]

One method of having one list, but keeping the new dance discussions sorted is 
the old OT trick, but instead of OT we would use ND (New Dance), or some other 
designator, as a preface to the name of the dance under discussion.  That being 
the subject of the email, anyone not interested could simply delete.  
Andrea
PS. I would be more likely to participate or at least follow if such 
discussions remained on this list.  

Sent from my iPhone

On May 9, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Bob Green  wrote:

> If we are going to post and vet new dances, I am quite certain a separate
> list would be preferable. Our little caller's group here in Missouri would
> alone double the word volume of the current list. While the total volume
> would be the same, I think there would be distinct advantages to having the
> dances presorted out from the other topics. I would most certainly
> subscribe to both lists if it were done.
> 
> Thanks for all you do Chris!
> 
> Bob
> 
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Chris Weiler (home) <
> chris.wei...@weirdtable.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hello SW callers,
>> 
>> I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about
>> starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all
>> callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the same
>> list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the callers list
>> volume is getting too heavy for some people.
>> 
>> So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_
>> subscribe to a choreography list?
>> 
>> Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think that
>> the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it divided into two
>> lists to increase the signal to noise ratio?
>> 
>> Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's just
>> lurking.
>> 
>> Chris Weiler
>> Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
>> Craftsbury, VT
>> 
>> 
>> __**_
>> Callers mailing list
>> call...@sharedweight.net
>> http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers
>> 
> ___
> Callers mailing list
> call...@sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Bob Green]

If we are going to post and vet new dances, I am quite certain a separate
list would be preferable. Our little caller's group here in Missouri would
alone double the word volume of the current list. While the total volume
would be the same, I think there would be distinct advantages to having the
dances presorted out from the other topics. I would most certainly
subscribe to both lists if it were done.

Thanks for all you do Chris!

Bob

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Chris Weiler (home) <
chris.wei...@weirdtable.org> wrote:

> Hello SW callers,
>
> I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about
> starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all
> callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the same
> list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the callers list
> volume is getting too heavy for some people.
>
> So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_
> subscribe to a choreography list?
>
> Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think that
> the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it divided into two
> lists to increase the signal to noise ratio?
>
> Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's just
> lurking.
>
> Chris Weiler
> Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
> Craftsbury, VT
>
>
> __**_
> Callers mailing list
> call...@sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers
>

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Bree Kalb]

I prefer one list that includes choreography. The list volume is not too heavy 
here for my taste; I start using delete when a discussion is going on and 
on. 

Bree Kalb
Carrboro, NC


-Original Message-
>From: "Chris Weiler (home)" <chris.wei...@weirdtable.org>
>Sent: May 9, 2012 3:23 PM
>To: Shared Weight <call...@sharedweight.net>
>Subject: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume
>
>Hello SW callers,
>
>I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about 
>starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all 
>callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the same 
>list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the callers 
>list volume is getting too heavy for some people.
>
>So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_ 
>subscribe to a choreography list?
>
>Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think that 
>the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it divided into 
>two lists to increase the signal to noise ratio?
>
>Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's 
>just lurking.
>
>Chris Weiler
>Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
>Craftsbury, VT
>
>
>___
>Callers mailing list
>call...@sharedweight.net
>http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers


Bree Kalb, LCSW
301 W. Weaver St.
Carrboro, NC 27510
919-932-6262 ext 216

Regarding the Use of Email -- Please Note: Although I use a firewall and my
computer is password protected, my emails are not encrypted. Therefore, I
cannot guarantee confidentiality of email communication. If you choose to
communicate confidential information with me via email, I will assume that
you have made an informed decision and I will view it as your agreement to
take the risk that email may be intercepted. Please be aware that email is
never an appropriate vehicle for emergency communication.  If you are 
canceling an appointment less than 48 hours in advance, please 
also leave me a voice mail message at my office.

“The curious paradox is that when I accept myself just as I am, then I can 
change.” Carl Rogers

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Lindsay Morris]

I'd vote for one list. Easy enough to search for the title if a dance there.

On May 9, 2012, at 3:56 PM, "Janet Bertog" <ja...@bertog.com> wrote:

> I was wondering if there would be some way that a website could be set up
> where new dances could be posted that people could go to.  That could keep
> the traffic on the list down.  The problem that I see with that is that
> people wouldn't be able to discuss the dances as easily, or if they did the
> dance and discussion would end up on the list anyway.  
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: callers-boun...@sharedweight.net
> [mailto:callers-boun...@sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Mortland, Jo
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:46 PM
> To: Caller's discussion list
> Cc: Shared Weight
> Subject: Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume
> 
> I would rather have two lists.
> 
> Jo  Mortland
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On May 9, 2012, at 2:23 PM, "Chris Weiler (home)"
> <chris.wei...@weirdtable.org> wrote:
> 
>> Hello SW callers,
>> 
>> I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about 
>> starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all 
>> callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the 
>> same list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the 
>> callers list volume is getting too heavy for some people.
>> 
>> So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_ 
>> subscribe to a choreography list?
>> 
>> Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think 
>> that the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it divided 
>> into two lists to increase the signal to noise ratio?
>> 
>> Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's 
>> just lurking.
>> 
>> Chris Weiler
>> Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
>> Craftsbury, VT
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Callers mailing list
>> call...@sharedweight.net
>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> ___
> Callers mailing list
> call...@sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> 
> ___
> Callers mailing list
> call...@sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Janet Bertog]

I was wondering if there would be some way that a website could be set up
where new dances could be posted that people could go to.  That could keep
the traffic on the list down.  The problem that I see with that is that
people wouldn't be able to discuss the dances as easily, or if they did the
dance and discussion would end up on the list anyway.  



-Original Message-
From: callers-boun...@sharedweight.net
[mailto:callers-boun...@sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Mortland, Jo
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:46 PM
To: Caller's discussion list
Cc: Shared Weight
Subject: Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

I would rather have two lists.

Jo  Mortland

Sent from my iPhone

On May 9, 2012, at 2:23 PM, "Chris Weiler (home)"
<chris.wei...@weirdtable.org> wrote:

> Hello SW callers,
> 
> I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about 
> starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all 
> callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the 
> same list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the 
> callers list volume is getting too heavy for some people.
> 
> So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_ 
> subscribe to a choreography list?
> 
> Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think 
> that the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it divided 
> into two lists to increase the signal to noise ratio?
> 
> Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's 
> just lurking.
> 
> Chris Weiler
> Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
> Craftsbury, VT
> 
> 
> ___
> Callers mailing list
> call...@sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
___
Callers mailing list
call...@sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Chris Page]

I'd rather keep it on this list until there's enough traffic to
support another list. There's a minimum amount of traffic needed to
keep a list alive.

Anyone remember WebContent?

Dead for six months after a brief flurry of initial posts.

Musicians?

Just has the rare press release.

And those were topics clearly separate from the main caller's list.

-Chris Page
San Diego

p.s. An alternate is to request people mark choreography posts in
their headers with some sort of tag, like [Choreo]. That's not the
best word, but it gives people an idea.

Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Perry Shafran]

I would subscribe.  Although I'm pretty sure that nearly everyone on the 
callers list would be on the choreography list so the volume of mail would stay 
the same.  And since knowing choreography is an important part of being a 
caller that I would think that one list would suffice.  Volume doesn't really 
bother me - the more info the better!

Perry

--- On Wed, 5/9/12, Chris Weiler (home) <chris.wei...@weirdtable.org> wrote:

From: Chris Weiler (home) <chris.wei...@weirdtable.org>
Subject: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume
To: "Shared Weight" <call...@sharedweight.net>
List-Post: callers@lists.sharedweight.net
Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 3:23 PM

Hello SW callers,

I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about starting a 
new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all callers would want to 
be on both lists, so why not have them be the same list? My only answer that I 
could think of why not is if the callers list volume is getting too heavy for 
some people.

So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_ subscribe 
to a choreography list?

Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think that the 
volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it divided into two lists to 
increase the signal to noise ratio?

Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's just 
lurking.

Chris Weiler
Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
Craftsbury, VT


___
Callers mailing list
call...@sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers

[Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

[Chris Weiler (home)]

Hello SW callers,

I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about 
starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all 
callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the same 
list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the callers 
list volume is getting too heavy for some people.


So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_ 
subscribe to a choreography list?


Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think that 
the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it divided into 
two lists to increase the signal to noise ratio?


Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's 
just lurking.


Chris Weiler
Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
Craftsbury, VT